DOCSLIB.ORG

Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Sixth Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Sixth Bibliography City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research York College 2010 Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Sixth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki CUNY York College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/yc_pubs/13 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] BffiLIOGRAPHY Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Sixth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki York College/CUNY This bibliography is a supplement to five earlier ones that were pub­ lished in the March 1994; December 1996, September 1998, December 2000, and September 2002 issues of the Bulletin of Bibliography, which has since ceased publication. During the intervening time, Holocaust denial has continued to be discussed in both the scholarly literature and the main­ stream press, especially during the trial resulting from the libel lawsuit filed by David Irving against Deborah Lipstadt and Penguin Books, and his sub­ sequent appeal of that verdict. The Holocaust deniers, who prefer to call themselves "revisionists" in an attempt to gain scholarly legitimacy, have refused to go away and have continued to take advantage of new media. Holocaust denial is a body of literature that seeks to prove that the Jewish Holocaust did not happen. Although individual deniers may have different motives and beliefs, they all share at least one point: that there was no systematic attempt by Nazi Germany to exterminate European Jewry. Hence they claim that the Holocaust is a hoax perpetrated by Jews (Zion­ ists) in an attempt to blackmail the rest of the world for sympathy, money, and legitimacy for the state of Israel. This bibliography includes both works about Holocaust denial and works of Holocaust denial. Although Holocaust deniers write in many lan­ guages, the scope of this project (as with the five previous ones)·has been limited to works in English. Because of space constraints, URLs are pro­ vided for only some of the materials that are available online-most newspa­ pers (including college' publications) now have websites that make the full text of their articles available for various periods. Many of the articles deal­ ing with David Irving and/or his lawsuits are available on the Holocaust Denial on Trial website, www.hdot.org, as well as on David Irving's own website, www.fpp.co.uk . The Nizkoi Project (see www.nizkor.org/) and The Holocaust History Project (www.holocaust-history.org) remain invalu­ able resources for information on Holocaust denial and deniers. While this bibliography has been divided into many subject areas, it is acknowledged that many of the entries cross several categories, especially the works in the "General Overview" section. Materials regardil)g David Irving's lawsuit against Lipstadt and Penguin Books are included under "European and Russian/Soviet Deniers," since Irving is. a British national 103 104 JOURNAL OF HATE STUDIES (Vol. 8:103 and the trial (and leave-to-appeal hearing) took place in London. Articles about the legal issues involved in the trial are included under "Legal Aspects of Holocaust Denial." As the sixth part of an ongoing research project, this bibliography does not include items that already appeared in previous installments of the bibli­ ography, regardless of how important and useful they remain. In general, this sixth bibliography contains items that were published since 2002, or older materials that were missed in previous bibliographies. GENERAL OVERVIEW Angove, R. (2005). Holocaust denial and professional history-writing. Master's thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon. Atkins, S. E. (2009). Holocaust denial as an internatiollal movement. Westport, CT: Praeger. Cameron, E. (~003). AIDS denial and Holocaust denial: AIDS, justice and the courts in South Africa. South African Law Journal, 120, 525-539. Chamy, I. W. (2003). A classification of 'denials of the Holocaust and other genocides. Journal of Genocide Research, 5, 11-34. Comins, L. (2003, April 2). Jewish scholar: Holocaust denial poses future danger. Wheeling News-Register. Feingold, H. L. (2007). The surprising historic roots of Holocaust denial. In D. R. Kaufman, G. Herman, J. Ross, & D. Phillips (Eds.), From The Protocols of the Elders of Zion to Holocaust denial trials: Challenging the media, the law and the academy. Portland, OR: Vallentine Mitchell. Holocaust, Denial of the. (2001). In R. M, Smelser (Ed.), Learning about the Holccaust: A student's guide (Vol. 2, pp. 100-104). New York, NY: Macmillan Reference. Imbleau, M. (2005). Denial, In D. L, Shelton (Ed.), Encyclopedia of genocide and crimes against humanity (Vol. 1, 243-247). New York, NY: Macmillan Reference. Krome, F. (2003). Holocaust denial. In N. J. Cull, D. Culbert, & D. Welch, Propaganda and mass persuasion: A historical encyclopedia, 1500 to the present (pp. 167-169). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. Lasson, K. (2007). Defending truth: Legal and psychological aspects of Holocaust denial. Current Psychology, 26(3-4), 223-266. Lipstadt, D. E. (2005). Holocaust denial. In D. l. Kertzer (Ed.), Old demons, new debates: Anti-Semitism in the west (pp. 165-171). Tean.eck, NJ: Holmes & Meier. Lobb, D. C. (2005). The right to revise history: The Institute for Historical Review, In L. L. Snowden & B. C. Whitsel (Eds.), Terrorism: Research, readings, & realities (pp. 197-217). Upper Saddle River, NJ: PearsonIPrentice Hall. Martin, R. (2002, May). Clio raped. History and Theory, 41, 225-238. 2010] HOLOCAUST-DENIAL llTERATURE 105 Mathis, A. E. (2006). General semantics and Holocaust denial. et Cetera, 63(1), 52- 61. Mathis, A. E. (2004). Holocaust, denial of. In P. Knight (Ed.), Conspiracy theories in American history: An encyclopedia (vol. I, pp. 321-324). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CllO. Medoff, R., & Grobman, A. (2007). Holocaust denial: A global survey-Z007. Washington, DC: The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies. An annual year-end report; retrieved from http://www.wymaninstitute.orglarticles! HolocaustDenial2oo7.pdf Moldovan, R. (2005, Summer). Anatomy of a hoax: Holocaust denial. Journal for the Study ofRetigions &oldeologies, no. II. Retrieved from http://www.jsri.ro! 0Idlhtrnl%20versioniindexlno_lllralucamoldovan-articol.htrn Periy, M., & Schweitzer, F. M. (2002). Denying the Holocaust: A nea-Nazi mythology. In M. Perry & F. M. Schweitzer, Antisemitism: Myth and hate from antiquity to the present (pp. 175-212). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Pierard, R. V. (2004). Holocaust denial:' What it is and why evangelical scholars must categorically reject it. Global Journal of Classical Theology, 4(1). Retrieved from http://phc.ednlgL3_piecard_holocausCdenial.php Presner, T. S. (2000). Subjunctive history? The use of counterfacluals in the writing of the disaster. Storiografia: Rivista annuale di storia, 4, 23-38. Southgate, B. (2001, March 2). Why I ... think history needs a moral purpose. Times Higher Education Supplement, no. 1476, 16. Stauber, R. (2005). Holocaust denial, negationism, and revisionism. In R. S. Levy (Ed.), Antisemitism: A historical encyclopedia of prejudice and persecution (Vol. I, pp. 319-322). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CllO. Stern, Kenneth S. (2006). Denial of the Holocaust. In Kenneth S. Stern, Antisemitism today: How it is the same, how it is different, and how to fight it (pp. 78-95). New York, NY: American Jewish Committee. Waltid, A., & Lau, l. (2007, June 12). The evils of Holocaust denial. Wall Street Journal, p. A17. HOLOCAliST DENIAL IN AMERICA Alabama attorney general candidate denies Holocaust. (2006, May 14). Jerusalem Post. Retrieved from http://www.jpost.comiJewishWorldiJewishNews! Article.aspx?id=21716 Beirich, H. (2009, Winter). Revisionism, interrnpted: Controversy erupts on Holocaust denial scene. Intelligence Report, no. 136. Retrieved from http:// www.splcenter.orglget-informedlintelligence-reportlbrowse-all-issuesl2m! winter/revisionism-interrupted Bennett, G. (2003, June 24). Democratic party official resigns over e-mail. Palm Beach Post, p. 3B. 106 JOURNAL OF HATE STUDIES [Vol. 8:103 Bennett, G. (2003, June 30). Resignation doesn't end pressure on Ross. Palm Beach Post. Cattan, N. (2002, June 14). Shoah revisionists feel emboldened as anti-Zionist rhetoric gains in U.S. Forward, 1. Chatham, J. (2006, February 7). Butz's denial of Holocaust irritates Northwestern Univeristy: Tenured professor's views anger stude'1lS, faculty, but no action can be taken. Daily Northwestern. Churchill, W. (2003, Winter-Spring). An American Holocaust? The structure of denial. Socialism and Democracy, 24(52), 25-75. Cohen, J. S. (2006, February 4). NU professor backs denial of Holocaust by Iran chief: Iewish leaders fear support could add credibility to view. Chicago Tribune. Cohn, W. (2004). Chomsky and Holocaust denial. In P. Collier & D. Horowitz (Eds.), The anti-Chomsky reader (pp. 117-158). San Francisco, CA: Encounter Books. Footlick, J. K. (1997). Truth and consequences: How colleges and ulliversities meet public crises. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press. Frazer, J., & Bialoguski, S. (2003, February 14). Standard apologises for Holocaust-denier boost. Jewish Chronicle. Frazer, J., & Bialoguski, S. (2003, February 14). The unsavoury tales of Hoffman. Jewish Chronicle. Gallagher, D. F. (2003, January 20). Holocaust revisionism aimed at roommate­ service clients. New York Times, p. B3. Goodman, H. (2003, June 22). Note to Hitler's apologist returns to haunt sender
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Analysis of How the Herald Newspaper and WLOX-TV Covered Hurricane Katrina
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2011 Best Practices for Disaster Coverage: an Analysis of How the Herald Newspaper and WLOX-TV Covered Hurricane Katrina Nicole R. Sheriff Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Journalism Studies Commons Recommended Citation Sheriff, Nicole R., "Best Practices for Disaster Coverage: an Analysis of How the Herald Newspaper and WLOX-TV Covered Hurricane Katrina" (2011). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 264. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/264 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BEST PRACTICES FOR DISASTER COVERAGE: AN ANALYSIS OF HOW THE SUN HERALD NEWSPAPER AND WLOX-TV COVERED HURRICANE KATRINA A Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Journalism The University of Mississippi by NICOLE R. SHERIFF May 2011 Copyright Nicole R. Sheriff 2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT A substantial amount of research has been done on Hurricane Katrina and its effects on New Orleans, Louisiana. However, few studies have focused on how the Mississippi Gulf Coast was affected by the hurricane. The purpose of this study is to bring attention to the reporting efforts of WLOX-TV and the Sun Herald newspaper to cover Hurricane Katrina. This case study analyzes the practices WLOX and the Sun Herald used to cover the hurricane and to explore which practices could be implemented in other newsrooms in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Hosting the 'Holohoax': a Snapshot of Holocaust Denial Across Social Media
    COVID-19 disinformation briefingISD Briefing No.2 HostingFar-right the m ‘Holohoax’obilisation 10th9th August April 2020 2020 COVIDHosting-19 the disinformation ‘Holohoax’: A Snapshotbriefing of Holocaust no. 2 Denial Across Social Media Far-rightJakob Guhl mobilisation & Jacob Davey This is the second in a series of briefings from ISD’s Digital Research Unit on the information ecosystem around coronavirus (COVID-19). These briefings expose how Executivetechnology platformsSummary are being used to promote disinformation, hate, extremism and authoritarianism in the context of COVID-19. It is based on ISD’s mixture of natural Overviewlanguage processing, network analysis and ethnographic online research. This briefing Holocaustfocuses denialon the has way long far-right been one groups of the most and insidious individuals conspiracy are mobilising theories targeting around Jewish COVID-19 in communities,the with US. its The extremist first proponents briefing drawnin the from series across can the be ideological found on spectrum, ISD’s website. from extreme right-wing to hard left to Islamist. Research has shown that digital platforms have only served to amplify and mainstream this warped strain of thinking inTop recent Lines years.1 Far-rightThis briefing groups paper andprovides individuals a snapshot are of Holocaust denialAntisemitic content acrossspeech major and social ideas media are beingplatforms. opportunisticallyBy analysing the term using ‘holohoax’, the ongoingwhich is commonly usedadapted by Holocaust to incorporate deniers,
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Report by Professor Richard Evans (2000)
    Expert Report by Professor Richard Evans (2000) IRVING VS. (1) LIPSTADT AND (2) PENGUIN BOOKS EXPERT WITNESS REPORT BY RICHARD J. EVANS FBA Professor of Modern History, University of Cambridge Warning: This title page does not belong to the original report. The original report starts on the second page which is to be considered page number 1. IRVING VS. (1) LIPSTADT AND (2) PENGUIN BOOKS EXPERT W ITNESS REPORT BY RICHARD J. EVANS FBA Professor of Modern History, University of Cambridge Contents 1. Introduction 3 1.1 Purpose of this Report 3 1.2 Material Instructions 4 1.3 Author of the Report 4 1.4 Curriculum vitae 9 1.5 Methods used to draw up this Report 14 1.6 Argument and structure of the Report 19 2. Irving the historian 26 2.1 Publishing career 26 2.2 Qualifications 28 2.3 Professional historians and archival research 29 2.4 Documents and sources 35 2.5 Reputation 41 2.6 Conclusion 64 3. Irving and Holocaust denial66 3.1 Definitions of ‘The Holocaust’ 67 3.2 Holocaust denial 77 3.3 The arguments before the court 87 (a) Lipstadt’s allegations and Irving’s replies 87 (b) The 1977 edition of Hitler’s War 89 (c) The 1991 edition of Hitler’s War 92 (d) Irving’s biography of Hermann Göring 100 (e) Conclusion 103 3.4 Irving and the central tenets of Holocaust denial 106 (a) Numbers of Jews killed 106 (b) Use of gas chambers 126 (c) Systematic nature of the extermination 134 (d) Evidence for the Holocaust 140 (e) Conclusion 173 3.5 Connections with Holocaust deniers 174 (a) The Institute for Historical Review 174 (b) Other Holocaust deniers 190 3.6 Conclusion 200 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Brigitte Bailer-Galanda “Revisionism”1 in Germany and Austria: the Evolution of a Doctrine
    www.doew.at Brigitte Bailer-Galanda “Revisionism”1 in Germany and Austria: The Evolution of a Doctrine Published in: Hermann Kurthen/Rainer Erb/Werner Bergmann (ed.), Anti-Sem- itism and Xenophobia in Germany after Unification, New York–Oxford 1997 Development of “revisionism” since 1945 Most people understand so called „revisionism“ as just another word for the movement of holocaust denial (Benz 1994; Lipstadt 1993; Shapiro 1990). Therefore it was suggested lately to use the word „negationism“ instead. How- ever in the author‘s point of view „revisionism“ covers some more topics than just the denying of the National Socialist mass murders. Especially in Germany and Austria there are some more points of National Socialist politics some people have tried to minimize or apologize since 1945, e. g. the responsibility for World War II, the attack on the Soviet Union in 1941 (quite a modern topic), (the discussion) about the number of the victims of the holocaust a. s. o.. In the seventies the late historian Martin Broszat already called that movement „run- ning amok against reality“ (Broszat 1976). These pseudo-historical writers, many of them just right wing extremist publishers or people who quite rapidly turned to right wing extremists, really try to prove that history has not taken place, just as if they were able to make events undone by denying them. A conception of “negationism” (Auerbach 1993a; Fromm and Kernbach 1994, p. 9; Landesamt für Verfassungsschutz 1994) or “holocaust denial” (Lipstadt 1993, p. 20) would neglect the additional components of “revision- ism”, which are logically connected with the denying of the holocaust, this being the extreme variant.
    [Show full text]
  • Das Internet Und Die Leugnung Des Holocaust
    Bei dieser Arbeit handelt es sich um eine Wissenschaftliche Hausarbeit, die an der Universität Kassel angefertigt wurde. Die hier veröffentlichte Version kann von der als Prüfungsleistung eingereichten Version geringfügig abweichen. Weitere Wissenschaftliche Hausarbeiten finden Sie hier: https://kobra.bibliothek.uni-kassel.de/handle/urn:nbn:de:hebis:34-2011040837235 Diese Arbeit wurde mit organisatorischer Unterstützung des Zentrums für Lehrerbildung der Universität Kassel veröffentlicht. Informationen zum ZLB finden Sie unter folgendem Link: www.uni-kassel.de/zlb Wissenschaftliche Hausarbeit im Rahmen der Ersten Staatsprüfung für das Lehramt an Gymnasien im Fach Geschichte Eingereicht dem Amt für Lehrerbildung Prüfungsstelle Kassel Thema: „Das Internet und die Leugnung des Holocaust. Neue Perspektiven in deutschsprachigen Veröffentlichungen“ Vorgelegt von: Dennis Beismann 2011 Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Friedhelm Boll Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Einleitung............................................................................................................1 1.1 Stand der Forschung.....................................................................................3 1.1.1 Publikationen aus den Jahren 1970 bis 1993........................................3 1.1.2 Holocaustleugnende Publikationen im Internet....................................4 1.2 Anlage der Studie.........................................................................................7 1.2.1 Fragestellung.........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Steering Committee
    Steering Committee Year-End Report - 2013 Steven Aftergood Federation of American Scientists For the OpenTheGovernment.org coalition (OTG), 2013 was a period of Gary Bass Bauman Foundation accelerated growth in our leadership role in charting a path to greater Tom Blanton openness and an improved Freedom of Information Act, and working to National Security Archive leverage the US’s participation in the Open Government Partnership to push Rick Blum for meaningful openness reforms. Sunshine in Government Initiative As described below, our notable successes over the last year include: Lynne Bradley American Library -We coordinated and published an internationally-praised evaluation of the Association US government implementation of the first open government National Action Danielle Brian* Project On Government Plan and created a model National Action Plan to set the bar even higher for Oversight the second plan. Kevin Goldberg American Society of News Editors -OTG staff coordinated community efforts to improve the Freedom of Conrad Martin Information Act and successfully combatted attempts to roll back the right to Fund for Constitutional Government know in the Farm Bill. (Ex-officio member) Katherine McFate/ -Amplified transparency issues in the wake of revelations about the National Sean Moulton OMB Watch Security Agency’s mass surveillance programs. Michael Ostrolenk Liberty Coalition The Difference OTG Makes Thomas Susman National Freedom of Delivering Results in the Open Government Partnership Information Coalition David Sobel OpenTheGovernment.org set a high bar for civil society engagement in the Electronic Frontier Foundation National Action Plans created through the Open Government Partnership. Anne Weismann To create an unprecedented evaluation of the government’s Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics implementation of the plan, OTG worked with more than thirty civil in Washington John Wonderlich society organizations and academic institutions to develop and apply Sunlight Foundation evaluation metrics to the government’s performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Fourth Bibliography
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research York College 2000 Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki CUNY York College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/yc_pubs/25 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki This bibliography is a supplement to three earlier ones published in the March 1994, Decem- ber 1996, and September 1998 issues of the Bulletin of Bibliography. During the intervening time. Holocaust revisionism has continued to be discussed both in the scholarly literature and in the mainstream press, especially owing to the libel lawsuit filed by David Irving against Deb- orah Lipstadt and Penguin Books. The Holocaust deniers, who prefer to call themselves “revi- sionists” in an attempt to gain scholarly legitimacy, have refused to go away and remain as vocal as ever— Bradley R. Smith has continued to send revisionist advertisements to college newspapers (including free issues of his new publication. The Revisionist), generating public- ity for his cause. Holocaust-denial, which will be used interchangeably with Holocaust revisionism in this bib- liography, is a body of literature that seeks to “prove” that the Jewish Holocaust did not hap- pen. Although individual revisionists may have different motives and beliefs, they all share at least one point: that there was no systematic attempt by Nazi Germany to exterminate Euro- pean Jewry.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Antisemitism Rosh Hashanah 5780 September 29, 2019 Rabbi David
    Antisemitism Rosh Hashanah 5780 September 29, 2019 Rabbi David Stern Tonight marks my thirty-first High Holidays at Temple Emanu-El, a huge blessing in my life. In thirty-one years of high holiday sermons, you have been very forgiving, and I have addressed a diverse array of topics: from our internal spiritual journeys to Judaism’s call for justice in the world; relationship and forgiveness, immigration and race, prayer and faith, loving Israel and loving our neighbors; birth and death and just about everything in between in this messy, frustrating, promising, profound, sacred realm we call life. Except -- in thirty-one years as a Jewish leader, I have not given a single High Holiday sermon about antisemitism.1 References, allusions, a pointed paragraph here and there, yes. But in three decades of High Holiday sermons spanning the end of the twentieth and the beginning of the twenty-first centuries, not a single one about antisemitism. I’m hoping that doesn’t constitute professional malpractice, but it is strange. So I’ve asked myself why. Reason #1: I had almost no experience of antisemitism growing up. With one limited exception, I never even experienced name-calling, let alone any physical incident. All four of my grandparents were born in America, and our story was the classic trajectory of American Jewish integration and success. 1 Professor Deborah E. Lipstadt makes a compelling argument for this spelling. Lipstadt rejects the hyphen in the more conventional “Anti-Semitism” because it implies that whatever lies to the right of the hyphen exists as an independent entity.
    [Show full text]
  • Minority Percentages at Participating Newspapers
    Minority Percentages at Participating Newspapers Asian Native Asian Native Am. Black Hisp Am. Total Am. Black Hisp Am. Total ALABAMA The Anniston Star........................................................3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 Free Lance, Hollister ...................................................0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 12.5 The News-Courier, Athens...........................................0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lake County Record-Bee, Lakeport...............................0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 The Birmingham News................................................0.7 16.7 0.7 0.0 18.1 The Lompoc Record..................................................20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 The Decatur Daily........................................................0.0 8.6 0.0 0.0 8.6 Press-Telegram, Long Beach .......................................7.0 4.2 16.9 0.0 28.2 Dothan Eagle..............................................................0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 4.3 Los Angeles Times......................................................8.5 3.4 6.4 0.2 18.6 Enterprise Ledger........................................................0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 Madera Tribune...........................................................0.0 0.0 37.5 0.0 37.5 TimesDaily, Florence...................................................0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 3.4 Appeal-Democrat, Marysville.......................................4.2 0.0 8.3 0.0 12.5 The Gadsden Times.....................................................0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Merced Sun-Star.........................................................5.0
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Jan Van Pelt Auschwitz, Holocaust-Leugnung Und Der Irving-Prozess
    ROBERT JAN VAN PELT AUSCHWITZ, HOLOCAUST-LEUGNUNG UND DER IRVING-PROZESS Robert Jan van Pelt Auschwitz, Holocaust-Leugnung und der Irving-Prozess In 1987 I decided to investigate the career and fate of the came an Ortsgeschichte of Auschwitz. This history, publis- architects who had designed Auschwitz. That year I had hed as Auschwitz: 1270 to the Present (1996), tried to re- obtained a teaching position at the School of Architecture create the historical context of the camp that had been of of the University of Waterloo in Canada. Considering the relevance to the men who created it. In 1939, at the end of question of the ethics of the architectural profession, I be- the Polish Campaign, the Polish town of Oswiecim had came interested in the worst crime committed by archi- been annexed to the German Reich, and a process of eth- tects. As I told my students, “one can’t take a profession nic cleansing began in the town and its surrounding coun- seriously that hasn’t insisted that the public authorities tryside that was justified through references to the medie- hang one of that profession’s practitioners for serious pro- val German Drang nach Osten. Also the large-scale and fessional misconduct.” I knew that physicians everywhere generally benign “Auschwitz Project,” which was to lead had welcomed the prosecution and conviction of the doc- to the construction of a large and beautiful model town of tors who had done medical experiments in Dachau and some 60,000 inhabitants supported by an immense synthe- other German concentration camps.
    [Show full text]
  • Irving V. Penguin UK and Deborah Lipstadt: Building a Defense
    Nova Law Review Volume 27, Issue 2 2002 Article 3 Irving v. Penguin UK and Deborah Lipstadt: Building a Defense Deborah Lipstadt∗ ∗ Copyright c 2002 by the authors. Nova Law Review is produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/nlr Lipstadt: Irving v. Penguin UK and Deborah Lipstadt: Building a Defense Irving v. Penguin UK and Deborah Lipstadt: Building a Defense Strategy, an Essay by Deborah Lipstadt In September 1996, I received a letter from the British publisher of my book, Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory,' informing me that David Irving had filed a Statement of Case with the Royal High Court in London indicating his intention to sue me for libel for calling him a Holocaust denier in my book. 2 When I first learned of his plans to do this, I was surprised. Irving had called the Holocaust a "legend." In 1988, the Canadian government had charged a German emigre, Ernst Ztndel, with promoting Holocaust denial. Irving, who had testified on behalf of the defense at this trial, told the court that there was no "overall Reich policy to kill the Jews," that "no documents whatsoever show that a Holocaust had * Dr. Deborah E. Lipstadt is Dorot Professor of Modem Jewish and Holocaust Studies at Emory University in Atlanta where she directs the Institute for Jewish Studies. Her book DENYING THE HOLOCAUST: THE GROWING ASSAULT ON TRUTH AND MEMORY (1993) and is the first full length study of those who attempt to deny the Holocaust. She recently decisively won a libel trial in London against David Irving, who sued her for calling him a Holocaust denier and right wing extremist in her book.
    [Show full text]
  • And Burning Chair Limited
    AGREEMENT BETWEEN BURNING CHAIR LIMITED AND [AUTHOR] Dear [AUTHOR] Your Publishing Agreement with Burning Chair Limited The following pages contain your publishing agreement with Burning Chair Limited (“Burning Chair”) in relation to your book: “[TITLE]”. Please read it carefully. This is a legally binding document and so we strongly recommend that you take legal advice before signing. For ease of reference, we set out below the key terms of this agreement. Please note that the following bullet points are intended to be illustrative of the main agreement in the interests of clarity. You should still make sure you read and understand the main agreement. If there is any conflict between the below and the main agreement, the main agreement will take precedence. • The preamble states that this deal specifically only refers to your book, provisionally titled “[TITLE]” (“the book”). You are not tied to Burning Chair for any other past or future works, unless you separately agree to do so. • Rights granted. You agree that Burning Chair has sole and exclusive rights to produce, publish and distribute your book – worldwide and in the English language in eBook, paperback and audiobook formats (clause 1). If someone else infringes copyright in the book, Burning Chair can pursue them on your behalf (with Burning Chair covering the costs of doing so) (Clause 16). • Length. This agreement is for a minimum of 12 (twelve) years (clause 1.1). At the end of this period, this agreement will continue until either you or Burning Chair terminate it by giving three months’ notice in writing (clause 19.2).
    [Show full text]