Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Sixth Bibliography

Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Sixth Bibliography

City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research York College 2010 Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Sixth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki CUNY York College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/yc_pubs/13 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] BffiLIOGRAPHY Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Sixth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki York College/CUNY This bibliography is a supplement to five earlier ones that were pub­ lished in the March 1994; December 1996, September 1998, December 2000, and September 2002 issues of the Bulletin of Bibliography, which has since ceased publication. During the intervening time, Holocaust denial has continued to be discussed in both the scholarly literature and the main­ stream press, especially during the trial resulting from the libel lawsuit filed by David Irving against Deborah Lipstadt and Penguin Books, and his sub­ sequent appeal of that verdict. The Holocaust deniers, who prefer to call themselves "revisionists" in an attempt to gain scholarly legitimacy, have refused to go away and have continued to take advantage of new media. Holocaust denial is a body of literature that seeks to prove that the Jewish Holocaust did not happen. Although individual deniers may have different motives and beliefs, they all share at least one point: that there was no systematic attempt by Nazi Germany to exterminate European Jewry. Hence they claim that the Holocaust is a hoax perpetrated by Jews (Zion­ ists) in an attempt to blackmail the rest of the world for sympathy, money, and legitimacy for the state of Israel. This bibliography includes both works about Holocaust denial and works of Holocaust denial. Although Holocaust deniers write in many lan­ guages, the scope of this project (as with the five previous ones)·has been limited to works in English. Because of space constraints, URLs are pro­ vided for only some of the materials that are available online-most newspa­ pers (including college' publications) now have websites that make the full text of their articles available for various periods. Many of the articles deal­ ing with David Irving and/or his lawsuits are available on the Holocaust Denial on Trial website, www.hdot.org, as well as on David Irving's own website, www.fpp.co.uk . The Nizkoi Project (see www.nizkor.org/) and The Holocaust History Project (www.holocaust-history.org) remain invalu­ able resources for information on Holocaust denial and deniers. While this bibliography has been divided into many subject areas, it is acknowledged that many of the entries cross several categories, especially the works in the "General Overview" section. Materials regardil)g David Irving's lawsuit against Lipstadt and Penguin Books are included under "European and Russian/Soviet Deniers," since Irving is. a British national 103 104 JOURNAL OF HATE STUDIES (Vol. 8:103 and the trial (and leave-to-appeal hearing) took place in London. Articles about the legal issues involved in the trial are included under "Legal Aspects of Holocaust Denial." As the sixth part of an ongoing research project, this bibliography does not include items that already appeared in previous installments of the bibli­ ography, regardless of how important and useful they remain. In general, this sixth bibliography contains items that were published since 2002, or older materials that were missed in previous bibliographies. GENERAL OVERVIEW Angove, R. (2005). Holocaust denial and professional history-writing. Master's thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon. Atkins, S. E. (2009). Holocaust denial as an internatiollal movement. Westport, CT: Praeger. Cameron, E. (~003). AIDS denial and Holocaust denial: AIDS, justice and the courts in South Africa. South African Law Journal, 120, 525-539. Chamy, I. W. (2003). A classification of 'denials of the Holocaust and other genocides. Journal of Genocide Research, 5, 11-34. Comins, L. (2003, April 2). Jewish scholar: Holocaust denial poses future danger. Wheeling News-Register. Feingold, H. L. (2007). The surprising historic roots of Holocaust denial. In D. R. Kaufman, G. Herman, J. Ross, & D. Phillips (Eds.), From The Protocols of the Elders of Zion to Holocaust denial trials: Challenging the media, the law and the academy. Portland, OR: Vallentine Mitchell. Holocaust, Denial of the. (2001). In R. M, Smelser (Ed.), Learning about the Holccaust: A student's guide (Vol. 2, pp. 100-104). New York, NY: Macmillan Reference. Imbleau, M. (2005). Denial, In D. L, Shelton (Ed.), Encyclopedia of genocide and crimes against humanity (Vol. 1, 243-247). New York, NY: Macmillan Reference. Krome, F. (2003). Holocaust denial. In N. J. Cull, D. Culbert, & D. Welch, Propaganda and mass persuasion: A historical encyclopedia, 1500 to the present (pp. 167-169). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. Lasson, K. (2007). Defending truth: Legal and psychological aspects of Holocaust denial. Current Psychology, 26(3-4), 223-266. Lipstadt, D. E. (2005). Holocaust denial. In D. l. Kertzer (Ed.), Old demons, new debates: Anti-Semitism in the west (pp. 165-171). Tean.eck, NJ: Holmes & Meier. Lobb, D. C. (2005). The right to revise history: The Institute for Historical Review, In L. L. Snowden & B. C. Whitsel (Eds.), Terrorism: Research, readings, & realities (pp. 197-217). Upper Saddle River, NJ: PearsonIPrentice Hall. Martin, R. (2002, May). Clio raped. History and Theory, 41, 225-238. 2010] HOLOCAUST-DENIAL llTERATURE 105 Mathis, A. E. (2006). General semantics and Holocaust denial. et Cetera, 63(1), 52- 61. Mathis, A. E. (2004). Holocaust, denial of. In P. Knight (Ed.), Conspiracy theories in American history: An encyclopedia (vol. I, pp. 321-324). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CllO. Medoff, R., & Grobman, A. (2007). Holocaust denial: A global survey-Z007. Washington, DC: The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies. An annual year-end report; retrieved from http://www.wymaninstitute.orglarticles! HolocaustDenial2oo7.pdf Moldovan, R. (2005, Summer). Anatomy of a hoax: Holocaust denial. Journal for the Study ofRetigions &oldeologies, no. II. Retrieved from http://www.jsri.ro! 0Idlhtrnl%20versioniindexlno_lllralucamoldovan-articol.htrn Periy, M., & Schweitzer, F. M. (2002). Denying the Holocaust: A nea-Nazi mythology. In M. Perry & F. M. Schweitzer, Antisemitism: Myth and hate from antiquity to the present (pp. 175-212). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Pierard, R. V. (2004). Holocaust denial:' What it is and why evangelical scholars must categorically reject it. Global Journal of Classical Theology, 4(1). Retrieved from http://phc.ednlgL3_piecard_holocausCdenial.php Presner, T. S. (2000). Subjunctive history? The use of counterfacluals in the writing of the disaster. Storiografia: Rivista annuale di storia, 4, 23-38. Southgate, B. (2001, March 2). Why I ... think history needs a moral purpose. Times Higher Education Supplement, no. 1476, 16. Stauber, R. (2005). Holocaust denial, negationism, and revisionism. In R. S. Levy (Ed.), Antisemitism: A historical encyclopedia of prejudice and persecution (Vol. I, pp. 319-322). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CllO. Stern, Kenneth S. (2006). Denial of the Holocaust. In Kenneth S. Stern, Antisemitism today: How it is the same, how it is different, and how to fight it (pp. 78-95). New York, NY: American Jewish Committee. Waltid, A., & Lau, l. (2007, June 12). The evils of Holocaust denial. Wall Street Journal, p. A17. HOLOCAliST DENIAL IN AMERICA Alabama attorney general candidate denies Holocaust. (2006, May 14). Jerusalem Post. Retrieved from http://www.jpost.comiJewishWorldiJewishNews! Article.aspx?id=21716 Beirich, H. (2009, Winter). Revisionism, interrnpted: Controversy erupts on Holocaust denial scene. Intelligence Report, no. 136. Retrieved from http:// www.splcenter.orglget-informedlintelligence-reportlbrowse-all-issuesl2m! winter/revisionism-interrupted Bennett, G. (2003, June 24). Democratic party official resigns over e-mail. Palm Beach Post, p. 3B. 106 JOURNAL OF HATE STUDIES [Vol. 8:103 Bennett, G. (2003, June 30). Resignation doesn't end pressure on Ross. Palm Beach Post. Cattan, N. (2002, June 14). Shoah revisionists feel emboldened as anti-Zionist rhetoric gains in U.S. Forward, 1. Chatham, J. (2006, February 7). Butz's denial of Holocaust irritates Northwestern Univeristy: Tenured professor's views anger stude'1lS, faculty, but no action can be taken. Daily Northwestern. Churchill, W. (2003, Winter-Spring). An American Holocaust? The structure of denial. Socialism and Democracy, 24(52), 25-75. Cohen, J. S. (2006, February 4). NU professor backs denial of Holocaust by Iran chief: Iewish leaders fear support could add credibility to view. Chicago Tribune. Cohn, W. (2004). Chomsky and Holocaust denial. In P. Collier & D. Horowitz (Eds.), The anti-Chomsky reader (pp. 117-158). San Francisco, CA: Encounter Books. Footlick, J. K. (1997). Truth and consequences: How colleges and ulliversities meet public crises. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press. Frazer, J., & Bialoguski, S. (2003, February 14). Standard apologises for Holocaust-denier boost. Jewish Chronicle. Frazer, J., & Bialoguski, S. (2003, February 14). The unsavoury tales of Hoffman. Jewish Chronicle. Gallagher, D. F. (2003, January 20). Holocaust revisionism aimed at roommate­ service clients. New York Times, p. B3. Goodman, H. (2003, June 22). Note to Hitler's apologist returns to haunt sender

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    28 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us