5362 Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI) Volume

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

5362 Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI) Volume Impact Of Corporate Actions On Options Market Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI) Volume 12, Issue 7, July 2021: 5362- 5368 Research Article Impact Of Corporate Actions On Options Market Nijumon K John, Research Scholar, Research and Development Centre, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, Email: [email protected] Dr. Murugan.N, Professor, Dept. of Management Studies, PSNA College of Engineering and Technology, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu. Email: [email protected] Abstract The economic development of a nation is a basis for the existence of a well-organized financial system, which is the indicator of the health of the economy. Financial system may be viewed as a structure consisting of financial institutions, financial instruments, financial services, and financial markets. Capital market is one of the components that build an economy. Capital market is influenced by corporate actions. This study focused on imapct of corporate actions on option contract price of the companies. The study collected options price of selected companies on the day of corporate actions. The results concluded that options price of Ambuja cements and Indian Oil Corporation impact the option premium settlement on the day of corporate actions significantly and the other variables – Bharat Electronics Limited, CRISIL, GAIL, India Bulls, India Nippon, KPR Mills, Marathon, and Tata Steel - do not impact the option premium settlement significantly. 1. Introduction Share price fluctuations in the stock markets are unavoidable and these fluctuations are due to various reasons. One of the main reasons for the fluctuations in share price is the corporate actions of companies. These corporate actions can influence the shareholders. Shareholders can take the corporate actions in a positive way or negative way. On the basis of Corporate Actions, the investors make a judgment on the future performance of the companies. On the basis of this judgment, investors buy or sell securities. Distributions of dividend/interest, issue of rights/bonus shares, issue of fresh securities by issuers, splits, etc. made by the companies are called corporate actions. Corporate Actions are essential for all companies. The starting point of corporate actions is the ownership of individual units of investments. The ownership of common stock gives the investor the right to elect board of directors, vote for corporate actions that require shareholder approval, share in corporate earnings in the form of dividends, to 5362 Nijumon K John, Dr. Murugan.N participate additional shares being issued (Right issue), and to retrieve residual assets of the company at the time of liquidation. So, along with ownership of shares, there are benefits and rules to protect the rights attached to each share. The type and kind of corporate action would vary according to the way it is being defined. In general, the corporate action is described as “an event initiated by a company that affects its share”. Corporate events have numerous effects on the stock market and it is been observed that stock price movements is an area of research that attracted the attention of various researchers. But, there are limited research studies on assessing role of corporate actions on performance of options market in India. The present study intends to measure and analyze role of corporate actions on options market in India. 2. Review of Literature Corporate actions such as mergers, acquisitions and spin-offs often necessitate a change to the amount or name of the security deliverable under the terms of the options contract. When such adjustments occur, the short call position must deliver the adjusted security at the strike price where the call was sold. Many assertions are made about the impact of stock splits on stock prices. There are numerous studies which have estimated the effects of announcements related to stock split and other corporate events on the stock and market prices. In the present study, the impact of stock split is identified and the pertinent literatures related to the context are as follows: Pooja (2013) analyzed the market reaction around stock split announcement using event study methodology by taking a sample of 27 companies that split their stock during the period January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009. The result revealed that there is no announcement effect associated with stock splits in India. The study found improvement in trading volume of shares but daily turnover does not increase. Stock Splits were also found to improve the average number of trades and thus affected the liquidity of stocks in India. Sultan Singh and Kumari Supna (2013) examined the efficiency of Indian stock market around stock splits announcement in India during the period 2006-07 to 2009-10. A database of 309 observations by complete enumeration method had been constructed, which reduced to 219 observations after implementing the criteria. The event study methodology had been used for calculating the abnormal returns. Percentile method and the paired t-test for means have been used to examine the impact of announcement on liquidity. The study found significant CAAR and mixed results regarding liquidity aspect. From percentile method it was found that number of transactions had increased only in few companies but the results of the paired t-test was contradictory to the results. Deborah A. Ford, et al (2012) examined the influence of the number of financial analysts following a firm on market reaction around the announcement of stock splits. Results proved that the raw as well as abnormal returns at the announcement of stock splits were negatively related to the level of analyst coverage. The negative relation prevails even after controlling for size, book-to market, split factors and post-split target price. The findings of this article suggest that information asymmetry is an important factor influencing market reaction to stock split announcements. Koustubh Kanti Ray (2011) stated that stock split and bonus issue has impact over market movements. These events are tested for abnormal returns and liquidity. –30 to +30 days investigation window were taken for all the events to test the abnormal returns and the change in liquidity. The results 5363 Impact Of Corporate Actions On Options Market suggested that the Indian market reacts to the stock split announcements but not to bonus issues, and the change in liquidity is significant for stock splits at 1% significance level. Neetu Mehndiratta and Shuchi Gupta (2010) attempted to contribute positively to the understanding of the behavior of Indian share prices in relation to the dividend announcements. It is said that dividend announcements are usually considered as the positive signal to its shareholders and positive impact on share prices are also expected. A standard even study methodology is used to examine the price reactions on stock prices. This study found that average abnormal returns occur randomly. 3. Research Methods The study is descriptive in nature and secondary data has been used. As the study has an objective of measuring and analyzing impact of corporate actions on options market, event study methodology has been used. The event study methodology is used to examine option market reaction to the events considered in this study using abnormal return criteria. In this study, database is divided in to two windows namely Estimation window and Event window. Estimation window is T-34 to T-4 Event window is T-3 to T+3 Abnormal return has been calculated to determine price or wealth effect of the event considered in the study. Further, the abnormal model is most widely used in event studies and market model of abnormal return method is used in this study. Cumulative Abnormal Return (CAR) is calculated over windows T1 and T2. CAR i, t = ΣT1 AR i, t An attempt is made in this study to see whether corporate actions influence the performance of options market in India. For this study, the performance of options market in India is measured by premium of settlement on monthly basis. Further, 10 companies listed in the BSE were randomly selected and considered for the study and closing monthly share prices of those companies were considered for the study. Five corporate actions were identified. Corporate actions considered for this study include rights issue, dividend, buy back of shares, stock split, and bonus issue. In this study, total of 10 companies listed under BSE index have been selected randomly. Monthly closing price values of 10 companies are collected for the period from April 2008 to April 2018. The selected companies are Ambuja Cements, Bharat Electronics Limited, CRISIL, GAIL, India Bulls, India Nippon, Indian Oil Corporation, KPR Mills, Marathon, and Tata Steel. 4. Results and Discussion The unit root test was performed for all series of the data which are under consideration of this study in order to avoid spurious regression of non-stationary series at the level by employing Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) test statistic. The following table displays the results of the unit root test. 5364 Nijumon K John, Dr. Murugan.N Table 1: Unit Root Test – ADF Method At level 1st Difference Particulars Adj. “t” P value Adj. “t” P value statistics statistics Ambuja Cements -3.876687 0.016 - - BEL - - -10.46466 0.000 CRISIL - - -10.23676 0.000 GAIL - - -1.092533 0.000 India Nippon - - -6.389714 0.000 India Bulls - - -6.232384 0.000 Indian oil Corporation - - -3.512133 0.042 KPR Mills - - -10.06122 0.000 Marathon - - -8.388382 0.000 Tata Steels -12.45200 0.000 - - Premium Settlement -8.457967 0.000 - - Table 1 provides information about unit root test results. The data sets considered for the study namely Ambuja cements, Tata steels and premium settlements of options market are at stationary at the level. The data sets considered for the study namely BEL, CRISIL, India Nippon, Indiabulls, Indian Oil Corporation, Marathon, Gail, and KPR Mills are at stationary at level 1.
Recommended publications
  • Results for the Quarter Ended December 31, 2004 Under
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Results for the Quarter ended December 31, 2004 under Consolidated Indian GAAP Wipro records 56% growth in Profit After Tax Dollar Revenue in Global IT business grows 41% YoY; Operating Margin in Global IT business (before 1% non-cash charge for RSUs) at 27% Bangalore, January 21, 2005 –Wipro Limited today announced its audited results approved by the Board of Directors for the quarter ended December 31, 2004. Highlights for the Quarter ended December 31, 2004: • Profit Before Interest & Tax (PBIT) grew by 66% year on year to Rs. 4.76 billion (Rs. 476 Crores). Revenue for the quarter was Rs. 21.10 billion (Rs.2,110 Crores), an increase of 39% year on year. • Profit After Tax grew by 56% year on year to Rs.4.27 billion (Rs.427 Crores). • Global IT Services & Products Revenue increased 38% year on year, at Rs. 15.89 billion (Rs. 1,589 Crores). • Global IT Services & Products PBIT was Rs. 4.14 billion (Rs. 414 Crores), an increase of 65% year on year, contributed by pricing growth and productivity improvements. • Global IT Services & Products Operating Margin (excluding 1% non-cash charge for Restricted Stock Units -RSUs) was 27%, despite increase in compensation cost and Rupee appreciation • Global IT Services & Products added 26 new clients in the quarter. • India, Middle East and Asia Pacific IT Services and Products Revenues grew by 45% and PBIT grew by 69% year on year. Outlook for the Quarter ending March 31, 2005: Azim Premji, Chairman of Wipro commenting on the results said “We continued our strong performance into the third quarter of the fiscal year.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of India Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises Department of Public Enterprises
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HEAVY INDUSTRIES AND PUBLIC ENTERPRISES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC ENTERPRISES LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 1428 TO BE ANSWERED ON THE 11th FEBRUARY, 2020 ‘Job Reservation for SCs, STs and OBCs in PSUs’ 1428. SHRI A.K.P. CHINRAJ : SHRI A. GANESHAMURTHI : Will the Minister of HEAVY INDUSTRIES AND PUBLIC ENTERPRISES be pleased to state:- (a) whether the Government is planning to revamp job reservations issue for Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs) and Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in State-run companies following sharp fall of employment opportunities to them consequent upon disinvestment in all the Public Sector Enterprises (PSEs); (b) if so, the details thereof; (c) whether it is true that the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM) is examining the issue of job reservations for SCs, STs and OBCs in State run companies following disinvestment and if so, the details thereof; (d) the total disinvestment made in various PSEs company and category-wise during the last three years along with the reasons for disinvestment; (e) the total number of SCs, STs and OBCs presently working in various PSEs company and category-wise; and (f) the total number of SCs, STs and OBCs who lost their jobs in these companies during the said period? ANSWER THE MINISTER FOR HEAVY INDUSTRIES & PUBLIC ENTERPRISES (SHRI PRAKASH JAVADEKAR) (a to d): Job reservation is available to Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs) and Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs) as per the extant Government policy. The Government follows a policy of disinvestment in CPSEs through Strategic Disinvestment and Minority Stake sale.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007 | Reports & Filings | Investors
    Once upon a time, the world was spiky. Opportunities were unequal across countries, information was often walled and new economies were unheard of. But around the mid 990s, things started changing. Wealth began to spread, opening up fresh markets. A baby-boomer generation aged in developed countries while a Gen-Y exploded in emerging ones, rebalancing the workforce and propelling new economies. Technology became ubiquitous, connecting people and information. Together, these disruptive forces rearranged and leveled the global business-scape. Braving the waves of complex regulations and changing customer expectations, a new breed of entrepreneurs arrived to claim the unexplored land. They found a flat world. We live in exciting times. Infosys Annual Report 2006-07 | Winning in the Flat World Nandan M. Nilekani, CEO and Managing Director, Infosys Technologies Ltd., in conversation with Brianna Yvonne Dieter, Executive – Academic Relations, Infosys Technologies Ltd. Recently you have been talking about the world becoming companies should beat them by making their operations more flat. Could you elaborate further? cost-competitive and globally efficient. We believe that four major trends are changing the business Create customer loyalty through faster innovation: Customers stay landscape. They are: with companies which have the most innovative and useful products and services. Therefore, companies must be able to innovate rapidly The emergence of developing economies creating new markets l to offer products and services that customers value. In many cases, and accessible talent pools, this may require co-creating these offerings with customers or l A global shift in demographics, driving companies to tap young partners. and skilled talent pools outside of industrialized countries, Make money from information: Despite years of investment in l The ongoing adoption of technology which is changing how systems, few companies are truly able to leverage information to consumers and companies use technology, and improve their operational or financial performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Development Report 2017
    I II X Sustainability The essence of our existence. Organisation Profile GRI-102, SDG-8, 9 Ambuja Cements Limited (ACL), started in 1986, is India’s leading Cement Company. Ambuja Cement is the premier cement brand in India for Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), and low carbon products such as Pozzolana Portland Cement (PPC) and Pozzolana Composite Cement (PCC) having significant footprints across the Western, Eastern and Northern markets of India. Our customers range from Individual House Builders (IHBs) to governments to global construction firms. The total cement production for 2017 was 22.98 MT against the annual capacity of 29.65 million tonnes per annum (MTPA). Our employee strength stood at 5,328. In line with the 2030 SDG targets, Ambuja aims to achieve higher level of economic productivity through diversification, technological upgradation and innovation, with a focus on value-added products and services with sustainable human capital deployment. Nature of Company Ownership Ambuja Cements Limited (ACL) is a public limited company listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange Limited and National Stock Exchange of India Limited. The GDRs issued by the Company are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. LafargeHolcim Limited, Switzerland, is the majority shareholder. For the detailed shareholding pattern, please see the Annual Report on our website: www.ambujacement.com . Integrated Cement Plants Bulk Cement Terminals 1. Ambujanagar, Taluka Kodinar, District Gir 1. Muldwarka, District Gir Somnath, Gujarat; Somnath, Gujarat; 2. Panvel, District Raigad, Maharashtra; 2. Darlaghat, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh; 3. Kochi, Kerala; 3. Maratha Cement Works, District Chandrapur, 4. Surat, Gujarat; Maharashtra; 5. Mangalore, Karnataka. 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Halting Progress of Privatization in India. Nandini Gupta* Current
    From Commanding Heights to Family Silver: The Halting Progress of Privatization in India. Nandini Gupta* Current status of the privatization program In February 2010, India’s United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, led by the Congress party, resurrected its stalled privatization program with a secondary offering of shares in National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd (NTPC), one of India’s best performing government-owned firms, which owns 20% of India’s power generation capacity. The sale of the $1.8 billion block of shares reduced the government’s existing stake in the company by an additional 5%, leaving 85% still under government control. However, the poor performance of the offering has raised alarm bells for the government’s future privatization plans. NTPC was subscribed just 1.2 times for the secondary offering, mainly with the help of government-owned financial institutions (“NTPC issue scrapes through with support from SBI, LIC,” The Economic Times, February 6, 2010). Although two foreign investment banks, Citigroup and J.P. Morgan were advising the company, the secondary offering did not attract any foreign institutional investment. The poor performance of the offering has also raised questions regarding the growth prospects of this company, which is a “navratna”, one of the nine “jewels” in the government’s crown. In a recent speech, the top ranking bureaucrat in the power ministry, HS Brahma, pointed out the company’s low employee productivity (“Power secretary censures NTPC for low productivity,” Daily News and Analysis India, February 15, 2010). The lackluster performance may also be due to investor skepticism regarding the company’s ability to compete effectively with a rapidly growing private sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Auctions So Far
    Successful Auctions so far: S State Name of the Block Mineral Date of ML / Area Reserves (in Final Preferred Bidder No auction CL (in MT) Bid (in Ha) %) 1 Andhra Gudipadu block Limestone 08.06.2016 ML 40.82 26.66 8.12 Penna Cements Pradesh 2 Andhra Erragudi-Hussainapuram Limestone 26.09.2017 ML 131.57 9.03 10.6 Sree Jayajothi Pradesh –Yanakandla Cements Pvt Ltd 3 Andhra Nandavaram–Venkatapuram Limestone 26.09.2017 ML 24.739 1.66 10.7 Sree Jayajothi Pradesh Cements Pvt Ltd 4 Andhra Chigargunta – Bisanatham Gold 27.07.2018 ML 262.01 2.22 38.25 NMDC Limited Pradesh 5 Andhra Chintalayapalle- Limestone 28.11.2018 ML 417.51 92.24 13.4 Adani Cementation Pradesh Abdullapuram-Korumanipalli Ltd (CAK) 6 Andhra Gorlagutta Limestone 27.05.2021 ML 181.03 61.14 7.25 M/s. Sree Jayajothi Pradesh Cements Private Limited 7 Chhattisgarh Karhi-Chandi Limestone 18.02.2016 ML 242.13 155 58.95 Shree Cement 8 Chhattisgarh Kesla Limestone 19.02.2016 ML 108 67 10.15 Century Cement 9 Chhattisgarh Baghmara Gold 26.02.2016 CL 474.3 2.7 12.55 Vedanta Ltd 10 Chhattisgarh Kesla II Limestone 01.05.2017 ML 357.07 215 96.15 Dalmia (bharat) cement 11 Chhattisgarh Guma Limestone block, Palari Limestone 12.03.2018 ML 249.03 124 138.25 Ultratech Cement 12 Chhattisgarh Mohra (Block A), Limestone 08.09.2020 ML 127.05 56.847 5.45 State Govt to inform Balodabazar, Balodabazar- Bhatapara 13 Chhattisgarh Parsabhadar, Balodabazar, Limestone 08.09.2020 ML 28.461 9.614 34.15 State Govt to inform Balodabazar-Bhatapara 14 Gujarat Mudhvay Sub- block B Limestone 25.05.2017 ML 233.5 301.5
    [Show full text]
  • Bharat Electronics
    Call Success - Bharat Electronics We had recommended a BUY on Bharat Electronics in our Idea2Act report dated 03rd December 2020, with a target price of ₹139. We are pleased to inform you that the stock met the target of ₹139 on 14th January 2021, giving a return of ~24%! Bharat Electronics Recommendation on 3rd December 2020 BUY Recommended price ₹ 112 Target price ₹ 139 As on 14th January 2021 Stock has hit a high of ₹ 139.7 25% . In this period, Nifty grew only 10.9% Previous Recommendations: Date Stock Name Reco Price Target Price P & L % Status 26-May-20 Emami Limited 205 241 18% Target Achieved Active Call (Dividend Rs10.15 2-Jul-20 ITC 201 235 10% exdate 6th Jul 2020) 2-Jul-20 NHPC 19.5 24 23% Target Achieved 15-Jul-20 HCL Tech 610 695 14% Target Achieved 30-Jul-20 INDIGO 920 1074 17% Target Achieved 11-Aug-20 JB Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals 750 867 16% Target Achieved 13-Aug-20 UPL 480 555 2% Active Call 18-Aug-20 Crompton Consumer 256 299 17% Target Achieved 28-Aug-20 Sudarshan Chemical 474 557 6% Active Call 14-Sep-20 Apollo Tyres 114.5 138 21% Target Achieved 1-Oct-20 Manappuram Finance Ltd 155.5 186 10% Active Call 15-Oct-20 Cyient Ltd 370 440 19% Target Achieved 28-Oct-20 Amara Raja Batteries 770 898 17% Target Achieved 2-Now-20 SIS (I) Ltd 363 423 17% Target Achieved 3-Dec-20 Bharat Electronics 112 139 24% Target Achieved 16-Dec-20 RBL Bank 233 273 17% Target Achieved 6-Jan-21 Alembic Pharmaceuticals 1075 1252 1% Active call Closing Price as on 13th January 2021 for Active Calls.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan Divestment Report to the Joint Committee On
    SUDAN DIVESTMENT REPORT TO THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON PENSIONS, INVESTMENTS AND BENEFITS June 30, 2016 Background and Statutory Requirements The 2007 Legislature passed Sudan Divestment legislation as part of Senate Substitute for House Bill 2457 (which is codified in K.S.A. 74-4921c). This statute stipulates that the Board of Trustees (“the Board”) of the Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (“KPERS”) shall not invest KPERS funds in a company with business operations in Sudan which meets the following criteria: 1) the company is engaged in active business operations in Sudan. If that company is not engaged in oil-related activities, that company also lacks significant business operations in the eastern, southern and western regions of Sudan; and 2) either of the following apply: a) the company is engaged in oil-related or power-related activities and the company fails to take substantial action related to the government of Sudan because of the Darfur genocide; or b) the company has demonstrated complicity in the Darfur genocide. Also, the statute directs the Board not to invest KPERS funds in a company that supplies military equipment within the borders of Sudan. Key statutory requirements of the Sudan Divestment legislation are summarized below. Research and Engagement The Board may contract with a research firm or firms to determine those companies that have business operations in Sudan. On or before September 30, 2007, such research firms may report any findings to the Board and may submit further findings to the Board if there is a change of circumstances in Sudan. In addition, by September 30, 2007, the Board must take all of the following actions: 1) review publicly available information regarding companies with business operations in Sudan, 2) contact other institutional investors that invest in companies with business operations in Sudan, and 3) send a written notice to a company with business operations in Sudan that the company may be subject to divestiture under the statute.
    [Show full text]
  • India Industrials
    7 December 2018 SECTOR UPDATE INDIA INDUSTRIALS AUTOMOTIVE Building blocks ROADS in place CHEMICALS FOOD & BEVERAGE Sales growth at a 30-quarter high Broad-based recovery; 33 of 40 companies growing in double digits CEMENT Trough valuations; at -1 standard deviation SUGAR RAILWAYS STEEL PAPER POWER 7 December 2018 SECTOR UPDATE INDIA INDUSTRIALS TABLE OF CONTENTS INDIA INDUSTRIALS Sandeep Tulsiyan 03 Introduction [email protected] Tel: (91 22) 6630 3085 04 Key charts We acknowledge the support services of Harses Kampani in the MAIN THEMES preparation of this report. 06 Observations during the quarter – Broad-based growth with resilient margins 10 Order backlog at a decade-high, order inflows double JM Financial Research is also 12 Outlook – Bright prospects ahead but we remain selective available on: Bloomberg - JMFR <GO>, Thomson Publisher & 13 Industrial Index – Bottom valuations with stout earnings growth Reuters S&P Capital IQ and FactSet 15 What surprised the street? Please see Appendix I at the end of this report for Important Disclosures 16 Investment cycle at a decade low, private capex quiet and Disclaimers and Research Analyst Certification. 18 Peer Valuations You can also access our portal COMPANIES www.jmflresearch.com 19 SKF India 22 Voltas 25 Kirloskar Oil Engines 28 Bharat Electronics OTHER REPORTS INDIA STRATEGY INDIA POWER RURAL SAFARI VIII INDIA ELECTRICAL 2019 OUTLOOK CONSUMER DURABLES JM Financial Institutional Securities Limited Page 2 7 December 2018 SECTOR UPDATE INDIA INDUSTRIALS Building blocks in place 5%+ for the 7th consecutive quarter Industrials growth Industrials - adjusted (%) MULTIPLE ENGINES FIRING 30.0% 25.0% An uptick in capex activity across multiple sectors has been 20.0% driving sharp and steady growth in India's industrials sector over the past few quarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Model Portfolio Update
    Model Portfolio update January 21, 2016 LatestDeal Team Model – PortfolioAt Your Service Large cap Midcap Name of the company Weightage(%) Name of the company Weightage(%) Auto 14 Aviation 6 Tata Motor DVR 4 Interglobe Aviation 6 Bosch 3 Auto 6 Maruti 4 Bharat Forge 6 EICHER Motors 3 BFSI 6 BFSI 23 BjjFiBajaj Finserve 6 HDFC Bank 8 Capital Goods 6 Axis Bank 3 HDFC 8 Bharat Electronics 6 Bajaj Finance 4 Cement 6 Capital Goods 5 Ramco Cement 6 L & T 5 Consumer 24 Cement 3 Symphony 6 UltraTech Cement 3 Supreme Ind 6 FMCG/Consumer 14 Kansai Nerolac 6 ITC 7 Pidilite 6 United Spirits 2 FMCG 8 Asian Paints 5 Nestle 8 IT 21 Infrastructure 8 Infosys 10 NBCC 8 TCS 8 Oil & Gas 6 Wipro 3 Meida 2 CtlCastrol 6 Zee Entertainment 2 Logistics 6 Metal 2 Container Corporation of India 6 Tata Steel 2 Pharma 12 Oil & Gas 4 Natco Pharma 6 Reliance Industries 4 Torrent Pharma 6 Pharma 12 Textile 6 Lupin 5 Arvind 6 Dr Reddys 4 Total 100 Aurobindo Pharma 3 Total 100 • Exclusion - Eicher Motors, Bajaj Finance (transferred to large cap), PVR, • Exclusion- State Bank of India, Bharti Airtel and ONGC CARE, Cummins & Shree Cement • Inclusion – Eicher Motors, Bajaj Finance (transferred from midcap), Wipro, • Inclusion – Ramco Cement, Bajaj Finserv, Supreme Industries, Indigo, Reliance Industries & Aurobindo Pharma Pidilite, Bharat Electronics and Bharat Forge Source: Bloomberg, ICICIdirect.com Research *Diversified portfolio - Combination of 70% large cap and 30% midcap portfolio OutperformanceDeal Team – At continues Your Service across all portfolios… • Our indicative large cap equity model portfolio (“Quality -20”) has • In the large cap space we continue to remain positive on pharma & IT.
    [Show full text]
  • ETG News June 2020 | #31
    ETG News June 2020 | #31 © EtherCAT Technology Group EtherCAT Technology Group Phone: +49 911 54056 20 Website: www.ethercat.org ETG Headquarters: Ostendstr. 196 Fax: +49 911 54056 29 Email: [email protected] 90482 Nuremberg, Germany For other ETG offices see website All trademarks acknowledged. Page | 2 June 2020 | ETG News #31 1 ADOPTION RATE Dear Members, 2 TECHNOLOGY I would like to ask each and every one of you how you are doing: Not 3 PRODUCT GUIDE in the sense of a greeting, but in the hope that you and your loved 4 CONFORMANCE + WEBSITE ones are in good health and that you will be able to cope with the CONTENT 5 SPECIFICATION EDITORIAL difficult economic conditions of this global crisis! 6 NEW MEMBERS COVID-19 is a challenge of unprecedented proportions. But we should not forget that we as members of the EtherCAT community 8 MEMBERSHIP GROWTH are among the privileged ones. This is not only because of EtherCAT – and certainly because of it – but because almost all of us belong to further information the automation industry, and this industry will certainly be among the first to be in demand again after the crisis. www.ethercat.org In ETG offices, of course, many things are different at the moment: In Germany, the USA and Japan, most of us still work from our home offices. Face-to-face meetings have not been able to take place since March and had to be replaced by online meetings or even cancelled altogether – and this will be the new normal for quite some time.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambuja Cements ( AMBCEM)
    Ambuja Cements ( AMBCEM) CMP: | 407 Target: | 490 (20%) Target Period: 12 months BUY July 26, 2021 Beats estimates with strong margins… About the stock: Ambuja Cement (a Holcim group company) is a large cement player with capacity of over 29.7 MT spread across North-Central (40%), West (~35%) and East (~25%) India. It has a large marketing set-up, pan-India presence and strong operational linkages with ACC. Particulars The upcoming new capacity at Rajasthan will enhance its cement capacity by Particular Amount 1.8 MT to 31.5 MT and clinker capacity by 3.0 MT Market cap | 80816 crore Debt (CY20) | 72 crore Result Update Result In the long run, the company plans to reach over ~50 MT capacity through Cash & Invest (CY20) | 686 crore significant de-bottlenecking and setting up of satellite grinding units EV | 80202 crore 52 week H/L | 410 / 196 Equity capital | 397.1 crore Q1FY22 Results: Ambuja Cement reported 149 bps QoQ expansion in margins Face value | 2 leading to better profitability despite cost pressure. Shareholding pattern Clocked revenue of | 3,371 crore, down 6.9% QoQ led by sales volumes de- (in %) Sep-20 Dec-20 Mar-21 Jun-21 growth of 11.3% to 6.4 MT. On a YoY basis, revenues were up 53.2% Promoter 63.3 63.3 63.3 63.3 EBITDA/t was up 10.8% QoQ to | 1,495/t (vs. last quarter EBITDA/t of FII 16.8 18.1 17.8 17.7 | 1,349/t). EBITDA margin was at 28.5%, up 149 bps QoQ, 112 bps YoY DII 13.3 11.5 12.4 12.5 Others 6.6 7.1 6.6 6.5 Reported PAT was at | 723.1 crore, up 59.5% YoY, 8.8% QoQ vs.
    [Show full text]