DOCSLIB.ORG

Independent Evaluation of Our Congo Program's Impact

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Independent Evaluation of Our Congo Program's Impact Development Justice Human Rights Free the Slaves / Search for Common Ground Final Evaluation Strengthening Community -Driven Responses and Accountability Mechanisms to End Slavery in Eastern DR Congo Mining Zones Final Report December 201 5 Carole Berrih Evaluation report: Strengthening Community -Driven Responses and Accountability Mechanisms to End Slavery in Eastern DR Congo Mining Zones December 2015 This report was prepared independently by Carole Berrih, Synergies Coopération Free the Slaves acknowledges the following generous financial support: U.S. Department of State Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons - J/TIP - CONGO S-SJTIP-12-GR-1036 Open Square Charitable Gift Fund Front page: Luwowo Manganese mine (Masisi territory) Credit for all pictures: C Berrih 2 Table of content s List of pictures ............................................................................................................................................... 5 List of tables .................................................................................................................................................. 5 List of acronyms ............................................................................................................................................ 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 7 Methodology .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Results ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Relevance ............................................................................................................................................... 8 Effectiveness .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Efficiency................................................................................................................................................. 9 Impact ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 Sustainability ........................................................................................................................................ 10 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 11 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 13 1.1. Context and rationale of the evaluation ....................................................................................... 13 1.1.1. General context.................................................................................................................. 13 1.1.2. Free the Slaves’ project on Fighting Human Trafficking in North Kivu ....................... 13 1.2. Evaluation objectives....................................................................................................................... 16 2. METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................................... 18 2.1. Methodological principles .............................................................................................................. 18 2.2. Review of literature ......................................................................................................................... 19 2.3. Field study ......................................................................................................................................... 19 2.3.1. Semi-structured focus group discussions ............................................................................. 19 2.3.2. Key informant interviews......................................................................................................... 19 2.3.3. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Survey (KAP survey) ................................................... 20 2.3.4. Observation ............................................................................................................................... 21 2.3.5. Data management and analysis ............................................................................................. 21 2.3.6. Reporting results ...................................................................................................................... 22 2.4. Limits and weaknesses of the evaluation .................................................................................... 22 3. RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................... 24 3.1. Project relevance: Was the project consistent with needs and priorities? .............................. 24 3.1.1. Alignment with local context and needs ............................................................................... 24 3.1.2. Incorporation of cross-cutting issues .................................................................................... 26 3.2. Effectiveness: Have activities been implemented and to what extent were the indicators met? .............................................................................................................................................. 28 3.2.1. Increasing resistance to slavery in fifteen mining communities: activities and indicators ............................................................................................................................................................... 28 3.2.2. Increasing knowledge of slavery and means for resisting slavery among the general public: activities and indicators ......................................................................................................... 33 3.2.3. Establishing an anti-slavery coalition of Congolese Civil Society Organizations: activities and indicators ...................................................................................................................................... 37 3 3.2.4. Increasing targeted government officials’ anti-slavery knowledge and actions: activities and indicators ...................................................................................................................................... 39 3.2.5. Effectiveness: in summary ....................................................................................................... 40 3.3. Project efficiency: Were the effects obtained with the least possible resources? .................. 42 3.3.1. Mobilization of funds and cost-efficiency analysis............................................................... 42 3.3.2. Mobilization of human resources .......................................................................................... 44 3.3.3. Delays and adjustments to the schedule .............................................................................. 45 3.3.4. Project implementation methods and monitoring system ................................................ 46 3.4. Project impact: What are the project’s positive and negative impacts? ................................... 49 3.4.1. Objective 1: increase increase resistance to slavery in fifteen vulnerable mining communities in North Kivu ................................................................................................................ 50 3.4.2. Objective 2: increase knowledge of slavery and means for resisting slavery among the general public in eastern DRC ........................................................................................................... 55 3.4.3. Objective 3: establish an anti-slavery coalition of Congolese Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) .................................................................................................................................................... 64 3.4.4. Objective 4: increase targeted government officials’ anti-slavery knowledge and actions in North Kivu ........................................................................................................................................ 67 3.4.5. Unplanned results and impacts on other institutions ......................................................... 70 3.5. Project sustainability: Will the project impacts be sustainable? ............................................... 73 3.5.1. Sustainability of community-based CVCs .............................................................................. 73 3.5.2. Sustainability of livelihood support ........................................................................................ 74 3.5.3. Coalition of CSOs ...................................................................................................................... 75 3.5.4. Sustainability of training activities .......................................................................................... 75 4. DISCUSSION: HAS THE PROJECT INCREASED COMMUNITY-LED RESISTANCE TO SLAVERY IN EASTERN DRC MINING ZONES? ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 620290Wp0democ0box036147
    Public Disclosure Authorized WORLD DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2011 BACKGROUND CASE STUDY EMOCRATIC EPUBLIC OF THE ONGO Public Disclosure Authorized D R C Tony Gambino March 2, 2011 (Final Revisions Received) The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author. They do not necessarily represent the views of the World Development Report 2011 team, the World Public Disclosure Authorized Bank and its affiliated organizations, or those of the Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent Tony Gambino has worked on development and foreign policy issues for more than thirty years. For the last fourteen years, he has concentrated on the problems of fragile states, with a special focus on the states of Central Africa. He coordinated USAID’s re-engagement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in 1997 and served there as USAID Mission Director from 2001-2004. He began his work in the Congo in 1979. The author wishes to thank Gérard Prunier, René Lemarchand, Ivor Fung (Director of the UN Regional Centre for Peace and Disarmament in Africa), Rachel Locke, (Head, Africa Team, Office for Conflict Mitigation and Management, Bureau for Africa, USAID), and Thierry Vircoulon (Project Director, Central Africa, International Crisis Group) for their thoughtful, insightful comments. The paper was greatly improved as a result of their questions, concerns, and comments. Remaining flaws are due to the author’s own analytical shortcomings. This paper was largely Public Disclosure Authorized completed in early 2010. Therefore, it does not include information on or analysis of the change from MONUC to MONUSCO or other important events that occurred later in 2010 or in early 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Président Du Conseil De Sécurité Présente
    Le Président du Conseil de sécurité présente ses compliments aux membres du Conseil et a l'honneur de transmettre, pour information, le texte d'une lettre datée du 2 juin 2020, adressée au Président du Conseil de sécurité, par le Groupe d’experts sur la République démocratique du Congo reconduit suivant la résolution 2478 (2019) du Conseil de sécurité, ainsi que les pièces qui y sont jointes. Cette lettre et les pièces qui y sont jointes seront publiées comme document du Conseil de sécurité sous la cote S/2020/482. Le 2 juin 2020 The President of the Security Council presents his compliments to the members of the Council and has the honour to transmit herewith, for their information, a copy of a letter dated 2 June 2020 from the Group of Experts on the Democratic Republic of the Congo extended pursuant to Security Council resolution 2478 (2019) addressed to the President of the Security Council, and its enclosures. This letter and its enclosures will be issued as a document of the Security Council under the symbol S/2020/482. 2 June 2020 UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES POSTAL ADDRESS-ADRESSE POSTALE: UNITED NATIONS, N.Y. 10017 CABLE ADDRESS -ADRESSE TELEGRAPHIQUE: UNATIONS NEWYORK REFERENCE: S/AC.43/2020/GE/OC.171 2 juin 2020 Monsieur Président, Les membres du Groupe d’experts sur la République démocratique du Congo, dont le mandat a été prorogé par le Conseil de sécurité dans sa résolution 2478 (2019), ont l’honneur de vous faire parvenir leur rapport final, conformément au paragraphe 4 de ladite résolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Of 20 April 2015
    L 102/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 21.4.2015 COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/614 of 20 April 2015 implementing Article 9(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 of 18 July 2005 concerning restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of Congo (1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof, Whereas: (1) On 18 July 2005, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005. (2) On 5 February 2015, the Security Council Committee established pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1533 (2004) concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo issued an updated list of individuals and entities subject to restrictive measures. (3) Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 is replaced by the text appearing in the Annex to this Regulation. Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Luxembourg, 20 April 2015. For the Council The President F. MOGHERINI (1) OJ L 193, 23.7.2005, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Conflict Motives: M23
    Mapping Conflict Motives: M23 1 Front Cover image: M23 combatants marching into Goma wearing RDF uniforms Antwerp, November 2012 2 Table of Contents Introduction 4 1. Background 5 2. The rebels with grievances hypothesis: unconvincing 9 3. The ethnic agenda: division within ranks 11 4. Control over minerals: Not a priority 14 5. Power motives: geopolitics and Rwandan involvement 16 Conclusion 18 3 Introduction Since 2004, IPIS has published various reports on the conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Between 2007 and 2010 IPIS focussed predominantly on the motives of the most significant remaining armed groups in the DRC in the aftermath of the Congo wars of 1996 and 1998.1 Since 2010 many of these groups have demobilised and several have integrated into the Congolese army (FARDC) and the security situation in the DRC has been slowly stabilising. However, following the November 2011 elections, a chain of events led to the creation of a ‘new’ armed group that called itself “M23”. At first, after being cornered by the FARDC near the Rwandan border, it seemed that the movement would be short-lived. However, over the following two months M23 made a remarkable recovery, took Rutshuru and Goma, and started to show national ambitions. In light of these developments and the renewed risk of large-scale armed conflict in the DRC, the European Network for Central Africa (EURAC) assessed that an accurate understanding of M23’s motives among stakeholders will be crucial for dealing with the current escalation. IPIS volunteered to provide such analysis as a brief update to its ‘mapping conflict motives’ report series.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release Local Voices EN Best Final
    Tapez pour saisir le texte LOCAL VOICES Congolese Communities & The Kivu Conflict ! press release A Series of Photostories on Local Realities of Conflict in Eastern DRC “Our drama is that armed groups are supposedly formed in order to protect their community, but at the end of the day, it is the very same armed groups that kill their own community.” A community leader from Goma, North Kivu ! ! “All our troubles [of armed conflict] came from bad governance. We succeeded institutionalizing the culture of corruption in our country.” A Civil Society activist from Goma, North Kivu. ! ! “As long as armed groups remain, we will never be able to return to our villages!” A woman among the two millions of internally displaced persons (IDPs) that are forced to live in a camp because of armed violence in North and South Kivu. local voices - congolese communities & the kivu conflict - www.localvoicesproject.com A member of APCLS armed group is leaving its military base to fight Cheka armed group in Pinga, Walikale territory. Both groups fight for the control of Pinga and the mineral resources that are abundant in Walikale territory. Lukweti, Masisi territory, North Kivu, August 2013. local voices - congolese communities & the kivu conflict - www.localvoicesproject.com Tapez pour saisir le texte LOCAL VOICES - Congolese Communities & The Kivu Conflict ! A Series of photostories helps make local voices heard on DRC conflict Local Voices, Search For Common Ground and International Alert are proud to announce the launch of their joint project Local Voices – Congolese Communities & The Kivu Conflict on December 5, 2013. ! ! Local Voices – Congolese Communities & The Kivu Conflict aims to share the experiences of the local populations who, in remote areas of Kivu, have been facing militias and armed violence for 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Conflict and Forced Migration in the Democratic Republic of Congo Credit: Adrian Arbib
    Dynamics of conflict and forced migration in the Democratic Republic of Congo Credit: Adrian Arbib Experts workshop: report 30 November – 1 December 2010, Oxford Workshop rapporteurs Henning Tamm, University of Oxford Claire Lauterbach, RSC January 2011 Refugee Studies Centre Oxford Department of International Development University of Oxford Dynamics of conflict and forced migration in the Democratic Republic of Congo This report1 provides a summary of the main points raised in both presentations and participant discussions, organised along five inter-related themes that emerged during the workshop. Each section in the report presents some avenues for consideration in developing innovative solutions to the issues raised. The workshop brought together practitioners, academics, and policymakers from the DRC and beyond with the following goals: • To consider the relation between forced population displacements both within and outside the DRC, the prolonged presence of armed groups, the return of the displaced, and the continuation of conflict; • To explore the effects of international intervention on the protection of civilians and whether humanitarian responses encompass a thorough analysis of displacement patterns; and • To find innovative durable solutions to displacement and conflict that can be developed and supported through local, national, regional, and international approaches. Day One focused on conflict, displacement, the return of populations, and the interaction between armed actors and civilians. Day Two explored various solutions to end the vicious cycle of violence, including sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) and displacement. The workshop was held under the Chatham House Rule of non-attribution, as the objective was to provide a forum in which participants could freely share their views and experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Republic of Congo • North Kivu Situation Report No
    Democratic Republic of Congo • North Kivu Situation Report No. 3 27 July 2012 This report is produced by OCHA in collaboration with humanitarian partners. It was issued by OCHA DRC. It covers the period from 21 to 27 July 2012. The next report will be issued on or around 3 August. I. HIGHLIGHTS/KEY PRIORITIES • Civilians are paying a heavy price for this week’s increase in violence in Rutshuru • Population movements continue, including towards Kibati, Katale and Goma • 60,000 children may be out of school in September as schools are looted or damaged II. Situation Overview The past week in North Kivu was marked by further escalation of the violence in Rutshuru territory where a RDC - Nord Kivu string of armed clashes prompted new population movements. Fighting broke out in Rutshuru on 24 July Orientale between the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of Congo (FARDC) and the M23- a group of FARDC Beni breakaway soldiers- causing civilians to flee mainly towards Kibati area and other towns such as Katale and Lubero OUGANDA Goma. Some 24 hours later, the M23 seized control of REPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE Nord Kivu Kiwanja and Rutshuru. DU CONGO Kanyabayonga The situation continues to be volatile after a month marked Rutshuru Karambi by armed clashes, including in Rutshuru on 6 July. On 17 Walikale Kitchanga Rubare Bunagana July the Raia-Mutomboki armed group clashed with the Ntamugenga Masisi Nyiragongo FARDC and seized control of Walikale, forcing some 70 Maniema Goma United Nations and NGO workers to temporarily relocate RWANDA to Goma. Sud Kivu 100 Km Civilians are paying a heavy price for the increase in Sources: ESRI, Europa Technologies, UNCS, RGC, OCHA et partenaires.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Violence Against Women and Girls in Eastern Congo
    THE WAR WITHIN THE WAR Sexual Violence Against Women and Girls in Eastern Congo Human Rights Watch New York • Washington • London • Brussels 1 Copyright © June 2002 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-276-9 Library of Congress Control Number: 2002107517 Cover Photo: A woman in North Kivu who was assaulted by RCD soldiers in early 2002 and narrowly escaped rape. © 2002 Juliane Kippenberg/Human Rights Watch Cover design by Rafael Jiménez Addresses for Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th Floor, New York, NY 10118-3299 Tel: (212) 290-4700, Fax: (212) 736-1300, E-mail: [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500, Washington, DC 20009 Tel: (202) 612-4321, Fax: (202) 612-4333, E-mail: [email protected] 33 Islington High Street, N1 9LH London, UK Tel: (171) 713-1995, Fax: (171) 713-1800, E-mail: [email protected] 15 Rue Van Campenhout, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Tel: (2) 732-2009, Fax: (2) 732-0471, E-mail: [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org Listserv address: To subscribe to the Human Rights Watch news e-mail list, send a blank e-mail message to [email protected]. Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.4 Child Soldiers
    vivo international Public Disclosure Authorized Sexual and Gender-Based Violence in the Kivu Provinces of the Democratic Republic of Congo: Insights from Former Public Disclosure Authorized Combatants SEPTEMBER 2013 Prof. Dr. Thomas Elbert Dr. Maggie Schauer Dr. Harald Hinkel Heike Riedke Dr. Anna Maedl Nina Winkler M.Sc. & M.A. Katharin Hermenau, M.Sc. Dr. Philip Lancaster Tobias Hecker, M.Sc. Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433 All rights reserved First published October 2013 www.logica-wb.net This report disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage discussion and exchange of ideas on gender and conflict related issues in Sub-Saharan Africa and is not a formal publication of the World Bank. The report carries the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. This report is edited by the Learning on Gender and Conflict in Africa (LOGiCA) Program of the World Bank within the Fragile States, Conflict and Social Development Department. This report has not undergone the review accorded to official World Bank publications. The findings, interpretations and conclusions herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank and its affiliated organizations, its Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. To request further information please contact [email protected] LOGiCA. This is report is also available on the LOGiCA website: www.logica-wb.net. Cover and layout design: Duina Reyes-Bakovic Photos credits: Harald Hinkel and United Nations photo library TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Search for Common Ground and Mercy Corps Launch FARM Program
    PRESS RELEASE OFFICIAL LAUNCH MEETING OF THE FARM PROGRAM, IN FAVOR OF STABILIZATION IN NORTH KIVU, RUTSHURU, AND MASISI TERRITORIES Rutshuru, July 18, 2018 – Mercy Corps and Search for Common Ground, leader and member of the FARM consortium respectively, officially launch a new stabilization program in North Kivu: FARM/Tujenge Kwa Utulivu. Provincial, territorial, and local authorities, as well as representatives of beneficiaries and stakeholders attended the launch ceremony, which took place in the territorial administration hall in Rutshuru. The FARM program is funded by the Dutch Kingdom and will end in April 2021. This program aims to improve stability in communities of Bwisha in the Rutshuru territory and the communities of Bashali in the Masisi territory, by facilitating access to land and natural resources as well as the development of more efficient, inclusive, and resilient market systems. The program will use democratic dialogue, strengthen land governance, and develop sustainable means of subsistence for at-risk populations. The FARM program aims to reach 44,500 direct beneficiaries and more than 200,000 indirect beneficiaries. Violent conflicts and massive population displacement have characterized the North Kivu province for more than 10 years, not only weakening market systems but also households’ capacities to access food. This causes food insecurity to rise for more than 60 percent of the population. Two interdependent factors aggravate this situation in the Bashali and Bwisha chefferies: limited access to land and insecurity, noting that 70 percent of the population in these two chefferies live off agricultural production. During the launch workshop, Mercy Corps and Search for Common Ground informed participants about the FARM objectives and activities that are beginning at the end of the inception phase (May 2017 to April 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • The Background to Conflict in North Kivu Province of Eastern Congo Rift Valley Institute | Usalama Project
    RIFT VALLEY INSTITUTE | USALAMA PROJECT UNDERSTANDING CONGOLESE ARMED GROUPS NORTH KIVU THE BACKGROUND TO CONFLICT IN NORTH KIVU PROVINCE OF EASTERN CONGO rift valley institute | usalama project North Kivu The background to conflict in North Kivu province of eastern Congo jason stearns Published in 2012 by the Rift Valley Institute 1 St Luke’s Mews, London W11 1Df, United Kingdom. PO Box 30710 GPO, 0100 Nairobi, Kenya. tHe usalama project The Rift Valley Institute’s Usalama Project documents armed groups in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The project is supported by Humanity United and Open Square and undertaken in collaboration with the Catholic University of Bukavu. tHe rift VALLEY institute (RVI) The Rift Valley Institute (www.riftvalley.net) works in Eastern and Central Africa to bring local knowledge to bear on social, political and economic development. tHe AUTHor Jason Stearns, author of Dancing in the Glory of Monsters: The Collapse of the Congo and the Great War of Africa, was formerly the Coordinator of the UN Group of Experts on the DRC. He is Director of the RVI Usalama Project. RVI executive Director: John Ryle RVI programme Director: Christopher Kidner RVI usalama project Director: Jason Stearns RVI great lakes project officer: Michel Thill RVI report eDitor: Fergus Nicoll report Design: Lindsay Nash maps: Jillian Luff printing: Intype Libra Ltd., 3/4 Elm Grove Industrial Estate, London sW19 4He isBn 978-1-907431-06-7 cover: Displaced people in Kiwanja, North Kivu, wait for World Food Programme aid (2008). Photograph by Marcus Bleasdale. This photograph does not represent any of the groups or individuals featured in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo Complex Emergency Fact Sheet #4
    DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO - COMPLEX EMERGENCY FACT SHEET #4, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2016 SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 NUMBERS AT USAID/OFDA1 FUNDING HIGHLIGHTS BY SECTOR IN FY 2016 A GLANCE Mid-September protests, clashes with 1%1% security forces erupt in Kinshasa and 5% 5% other areas of DRC 7.5 8% 35% million Response actors implement health 18% interventions to mitigate yellow fever, People in DRC Requiring cholera transmission Humanitarian Assistance 27% UN – January 2016 Logistics Support & Relief Commodities (35%) HUMANITARIAN FUNDING Health (27%) FOR THE DRC RESPONSE IN FY 2016 Water, Sanitation & Hygiene (18%) 1. 7 Agriculture and Food Security (8%) Humanitarian Coordination & Information Management (5%) USAID/OFDA $41,136,877 Shelter & Settlements (5%) million Protection (1%) USAID/FFP $62,487,642 IDPs in DRC Economic Recovery & Market Systems (1%) UN – June 2016 State/PRM3 $59,310,000 USAID/FFP2 FUNDING BY MODALITY IN FY 2016 5.9 47% 46% 5% 2% $162,934,519 U.S. In-Kind Food Aid (47%) million Local & Regional Food Procurement (46%) Food Vouchers (5%) Acutely Food-Insecure People in DRC Cash Transfers for Food (2%) Food Security Cluster – July 2016 KEY DEVELOPMENTS In recent months, insecurity and attacks by armed actors in eastern Democratic Republic 525,978 of the Congo (DRC), particularly in North Kivu Province, have resulted in dozens of DRC Refugees in Africa civilian deaths, the temporary abduction of humanitarian personnel, significant UNHCR – August 2016 population displacement, and reduced humanitarian access, according to the UN. The UN World Health Organization (WHO) recently declared that the yellow fever outbreak in DRC—which began in early 2016—is under control, as health workers 402,905 countrywide have not recorded a new case since mid-July.
    [Show full text]