DOCSLIB.ORG

Pochetok 1.Cdr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pochetok 1.Cdr BiodiversityStrategyand ActionPlanofthe RepublicofMacedonia MINISTRYOFENVIRONMENTANDPHYSICALPLANNING SKOPYE,2004 001 Skopye,2003 MinistryofEnvironmentandPhysicalPlanning Publisher: MinistryofEnvironmentandPhysicalPlanning Englisheditors: R.DarrellSmith,Ph.D. Englishtranslation: SvetozarPetkovski,Ph.D.,andVesnaSidorovska,Ph.D. Technicalpreparation: Grafohartija Printedby: Grafohartija Printingrun: 500copies CIP-Cataloguing-in-PublicationData NationalandUniversityLibrary"St.ClementofOhrid” Skopye BiodiversityStrategyandActionPlanfortheRepublicofMacedonia Skopje:MinistryofEnvironmentandPhysicalPlanning,2003.-134Pages.:Tables;30cm Bibliography:pp. ISBN:9989-110-16-6 Allrightsreserved.Nopartofthispublicationmaybereproduced,storedinaretrievalsystemortransmitted inanyformorbyanymeans,mechanical,photocopying,recordingorotherwise,withoutthepriorwritten permissionofthepublisher. 002 ThisdocumentwasbaseduponscientificdatausedinthepreparationoftheCountryStudyfor BiodiversityoftheRepublicofMacedonia.Thepreparationofthisdocumentanditspublicationwere financedbytheWorldBankundertheGlobalEnvironmentalFacility(GEF). SteeringCommittee: President: • MenkaSpirovska,Stateadvisor-MinistryofEnvironmentandPhysicalPlanning Members: • KonstantinSiderovski,MinistryofEnvironmentandPhysicalPlanning • DanicaPavlovska,MinistryofEnvironmentandPhysicalPlanning • StefankaHadzipecova,NationalCommitteeonBiodiversity • KristinaPavlovska,MinistryofFinance • PanceNikolov,MinistryofAgriculture,ForestryandWaterManagement • ZoranStojcevski,MinistryofForeignAffairs • SnezanaTasevska,MinistryofEconomy • TodorIvanovski,MacedonianMuseumofNaturalHistory,Skopye • StojmirkaTasevska,EconomicChamberoftheRepublicofMacedonia • SlavkoDamevski,PelisterNationalPark • VladimirDzabirski,FacultyofAgriculture,Skopye • KrsteRistevski,FacultyofLaw,Skopye • BorisGelevski,MacedonianMovementofEcologists ProjectManager: • VeselaLambevskaDomazetova 003 MembersoftheWorkingTeamInvolvedinthePreparation oftheBiodiversityStrategyandActionPlanfortheRepublicofMacedonia I. CoreTeam • VladoMatevski,Ph.D.,Professor-InstituteofBiology,FacultyofNaturalSciencesand Mathematics,Skopye • SvetozarPetkovski,Ph.D.,Museumadvisor-MacedonianMuseumofNaturalHistory, Skopye • LjupcoMelovski,Ph.D.,Asst.Professor-InstituteofBiology,FacultyofNaturalSciences andMathematics,Skopye • SretenAndonov,Ph.D.,Professor-FacultyofAgriculture,Skopye • NikolaNikolov,Ph.D.,Asst.Professor-FacultyofForestry,Skopye • SvetislavKrstic,Ph.D.,Asst.Professor-InstituteofBiology,FacultyofNaturalSciences andMathematics,Skopye II.Members • BrankoMicevski,Ph.D.,Professor-InstituteofBiology,FacultyforNaturalSciencesand Mathematics,Skopye • ZivkoSekovski,Ph.D.,Professor-InstituteofBiology,FacultyofNaturalSciencesand Mathematics,Skopye • JordeJakimovski,Ph.D.,Professor-InstituteforSociological,PoliticalandJuridical Research,Skopye • JovanRistov,Director-InstituteofProtectionofCulturalMonumentsoftheRepublicof Macedonia • SonjaIvanovska,Ph.D.,Assoc.Professor-FacultyofAgriculture,Skopye • MitkoKostadinovski,Ph.D.,Assoc.Professor-InstituteofBiology,FacultyofNatural SciencesandMathematics,Skopye • JaneAcevski,Ph.D.,Professor-FacultyofForestry,Skopye • PeceNedanovski,M.Sc.,Assistant-FacultyofEconomy,Skopye • ZlatkoLevkov,M.Sc.,Assistant-InstituteofBiology,FacultyofNaturalSciencesand Mathematics,Skopye • VasilKostov,M.Sc.-InstituteofLivestockscience,Skopye • SlavcoHristovski,Assistant-InstituteofBiology,FacultyofNaturalSciencesand Mathematics,Skopye III. OtherParticipants • VesnaSidorovska,Ph.D.,Vice-president-SocietyfortheInvestigationandConservationof BiodiversityandtheSustainableDevelopmentofNaturalEcosystems(BIOECO),Skopye • GordanaPopsimonova,Ph.D.-InstituteofAgriculture,Skopye • SaskoJordanov,M.Sc.-MinistryofEnvironmentandPhysicalPlanning • GoseStefkov,M.Sc.,Assistant-FacultyofPharmacology,Skopye 004 TABLEOFCONTENTS TABLEOFCONTENTS TableofContents .................................................I 3.KEYTHREATSTO Foreword ..........................................................III BIODIVERSITY ............................53 1.INTRODUCTION ...........................3 3.1.Socio-economiccontext ...........................53 3.2.Keyeconomicsectorsaffecting 1.1.TheValueofBiodiversity ........................3 biodiversity ..............................................55 1.2.ConventiononBiologicalDiversity ........3 3.3.Underlyingcausesofbiodiversityloss .....62 1.3.BiodiversityStrategy 3.4.Maindirectthreatstobiodiversity ............63 andActionPlan ........................................4 3.4.1Habitatloss,modificationand 1.4.Countrycontext .......................................5 fragmentation .......................................63 1.4.1.GeographicPosition ..........................5 3.4.2.Overuseofbiologicalresources ..........64 1.4.2.Physicalgeography ..............................6 3.4.3.Pollutionoftheenvironment ...............65 1.4.3.Climate .................................................8 3.4.4.Introducedandinvasivespecies ..........66 1.4.4.Hydrography .......................................10 3.4.5.Climatechanges ...................................66 1.4.5.Humanpopulationandsettlements ....11 3.4.6.Naturaldisasters ...................................67 3.4.7.Otherfactors ........................................68 2.BIODIVERSITYWITHINTHE REPUBLICOFMACEDONIA ....15 4.LEGALANDINSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKFOR 2.1.Diversityofecosystems ..........................15 BIODIVERSITY 2.1.1.Keyecosystems .................................15 2.1.2.Threatenedecosystems .......................20 CONSERVATION ..........................71 2.2.Diversityofspecies .................................26 2.2.1.Micro-organisms ................................26 4.1.Constitutionalbasis ...............................71 2.2.2.Algae ...................................................26 4.2.Legalbasis ..............................................72 2.2.3.FungiandLichens ..............................27 4.3.Internationalagreements .......................79 2.2.4.Higherplantgroups ............................28 4.4.Institutionalframework .........................81 2.2.5.Fauna ..................................................29 2.3.Endemicandrelictspecies ....................33 5.PROBLEMANALYSIS ...............91 2.3.1.Micro-organisms .................................33 2.3.2.Algae ...................................................33 5.1.Currentlossof,oreffectson, 2.3.3.FungiandLichens ..............................33 biodiversity ........................................91 2.3.4.Higherplants ......................................34 5.2.Directcauseofbiodiversityloss ............92 2.3.5.Fauna ..................................................35 5.3.Underlyingcausesofbiodiversityloss ...92 2.4.Rare,threatenedandextinctspecies 5.4.Keysectorsaffectingbiodiversity ..........93 andassemblages .....................................37 5.5.Constrainstoconservation ....................94 2.4.1.Micro-organisms .................................37 5.6.Oppurtunitesforconservation ..............95 2.4.2.Algae ..................................................37 2.4.3.FungiandLichens ..............................37 6.BIODIVERSITYSTRATEGY 2.4.4.Higherplants ......................................38 ANDACTIONPLAN ....................99 2.4.5.Fauna ..................................................41 2.5.Speciesofeconomicimportance 6.1BiodiversityStrategyforMacedonia .....99 (wildplantsandanimals) ......................43 6.1.1.TheOverallAim .................................99 2.5.1.Usageofwildplantsandfungi ...........43 6.1.2.GuidingObjectives .............................99 2.5.2.Useofwildanimals ............................45 6.1.3.StrategicPrinciples ............................100 2.5.3.Assessmentsofsustainability .............47 6.2.BiodiversityActionPlan 2.6.Geneticdiversity(gene-fund) ................47 forMacedonia ........................................100 2.7.Agrobiodiversity .....................................48 6.3.ImplementationoftheBiodiversity 2.7.1.Crops ...................................................48 StrategyandActionPlan ......................101 2.7.2.Nativebreedsoflivestock ..................49 6.4.MonitoringoftheImplementation oftheBiodiversityStrategy andActionPlan ....................................102 BiodiversityActionPlanforMacedonia ....104 005 006 FOREWORD FOREWORD Duringtheperiodsinceachievingitsindependence,theRepublicofMacedoniahasbeenstriving tobuildastablepoliticalandeconomiccommunity,withalegalsystemabletofacilitaterapid integrationintotheEuropeanUnionandthewiderinternationalcommunity.Thisprimarystrategic goalhasgivenrisetosectoraltargets,oneofwhichistheestablishmentofefficientenvironmental protectionmeasuresinordertoprovideabasisforanimprovedqualityoflife. Onecomponentofthisstrategicgoalistheconservationofbiodiversityandhabitats.Inthe processtowardachievingthisgoal,theRepublicofMacedoniahasratified: theConventionon BiologicalDiversity(1997), ConventiononWetlandsofInternationalImportanceParticularlyas WaterfowlHabitat(1997), ConventionontheConservationofEuropeanWildlifeandNatural Habitats(1997)andConventionontheConservationofMigratorySpeciesofWildAnimals (1999). Theseconventions,togetherwiththeinternationalagreementsassumedfromtheformerSocialist FederalRepublicofYugoslaviabymeansofsuccession,constitutepartofthenationallegislationand representabasisforbiodiversityconservation. Inspiteoftheexistenceoflegalbasesfortheregulationofbiodiversityconservation(Lawonthe ProtectionofNaturalRarities [1973]aswellasothersectorallaws),however,foralongperiodthere
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mycological Society of San Francisco • Jan. 2016, Vol. 67:05
    The Mycological Society of San Francisco • Jan. 2016, vol. 67:05 Table of Contents JANUARY 19 General Meeting Speaker Mushroom of the Month by K. Litchfield 1 President Post by B. Wenck-Reilly 2 Robert Dale Rogers Schizophyllum by D. Arora & W. So 4 Culinary Corner by H. Lunan 5 Hospitality by E. Multhaup 5 Holiday Dinner 2015 Report by E. Multhaup 6 Bizarre World of Fungi: 1965 by B. Sommer 7 Academic Quadrant by J. Shay 8 Announcements / Events 9 2015 Fungus Fair by J. Shay 10 David Arora’s talk by D. Tighe 11 Cultivation Quarters by K. Litchfield 12 Fungus Fair Species list by D. Nolan 13 Calendar 15 Mushroom of the Month: Chanterelle by Ken Litchfield Twenty-One Myths of Medicinal Mushrooms: Information on the use of medicinal mushrooms for This month’s profiled mushroom is the delectable Chan- preventive and therapeutic modalities has increased terelle, one of the most distinctive and easily recognized mush- on the internet in the past decade. Some is based on rooms in all its many colors and meaty forms. These golden, yellow, science and most on marketing. This talk will look white, rosy, scarlet, purple, blue, and black cornucopias of succu- at 21 common misconceptions, helping separate fact lent brawn belong to the genera Cantharellus, Craterellus, Gomphus, from fiction. Turbinellus, and Polyozellus. Rather than popping up quickly from quiescent primordial buttons that only need enough rain to expand About the speaker: the preformed babies, Robert Dale Rogers has been an herbalist for over forty these mushrooms re- years. He has a Bachelor of Science from the Univer- quire an extended period sity of Alberta, where he is an assistant clinical profes- of slower growth and sor in Family Medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruiting Body Form, Not Nutritional Mode, Is the Major Driver of Diversification in Mushroom-Forming Fungi
    Fruiting body form, not nutritional mode, is the major driver of diversification in mushroom-forming fungi Marisol Sánchez-Garcíaa,b, Martin Rybergc, Faheema Kalsoom Khanc, Torda Vargad, László G. Nagyd, and David S. Hibbetta,1 aBiology Department, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610; bUppsala Biocentre, Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-75005 Uppsala, Sweden; cDepartment of Organismal Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden; and dSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Center, 6726 Szeged, Hungary Edited by David M. Hillis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, and approved October 16, 2020 (received for review December 22, 2019) With ∼36,000 described species, Agaricomycetes are among the and the evolution of enclosed spore-bearing structures. It has most successful groups of Fungi. Agaricomycetes display great di- been hypothesized that the loss of ballistospory is irreversible versity in fruiting body forms and nutritional modes. Most have because it involves a complex suite of anatomical features gen- pileate-stipitate fruiting bodies (with a cap and stalk), but the erating a “surface tension catapult” (8, 11). The effect of gas- group also contains crust-like resupinate fungi, polypores, coral teroid fruiting body forms on diversification rates has been fungi, and gasteroid forms (e.g., puffballs and stinkhorns). Some assessed in Sclerodermatineae, Boletales, Phallomycetidae, and Agaricomycetes enter into ectomycorrhizal symbioses with plants, Lycoperdaceae, where it was found that lineages with this type of while others are decayers (saprotrophs) or pathogens. We constructed morphology have diversified at higher rates than nongasteroid a megaphylogeny of 8,400 species and used it to test the following lineages (12).
    [Show full text]
  • AR TICLE Diversity of Chroogomphus (Gomphidiaceae, Boletales) In
    doi:10.5598/imafungus.2018.09.02.04 IMA FUNGUS · Diversity of ( , ) in Europe, and Chroogomphus Gomphidiaceae Boletales ARTICLE [C. rutilus Ross Scambler1,6, Tuula Niskanen1, Boris Assyov2, A. Martyn Ainsworth1, Jean-Michel Bellanger3, Michael Loizides4 , Pierre- Arthur Moreau5, Paul M. Kirk1, and Kare Liimatainen1 1Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK; corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] 2!"#$"%'*+'///<'" 3UMR5175, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier, EPHE, INSERM, 1919, route de Mende, F-34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, France 4P.O. box 58499, 3734 Limassol, Cyprus 5Université de Lille, Fac. Pharma. Lille, EA 4483 IMPECS, F – 59000 Lille, France 6 Present address :Department of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK In this study, eight species of Chroogomphus are recognized from Europe: C. britannicus, C. aff. [ 1, C. fulmineus, C. cf. helveticus, C. mediterraneus, C. cf. purpurascens, C. rutilus, and C. subfulmineus. DNA barcode Different candidates for the application of the name C. rutilus[ ITS =>Chroogomphus fulmineus and C. mediterraneus are molecular systematics [C. subfulmineus?[ new taxa a new subgenus Siccigomphus and three new sections, Confusi, Filiformes, and Fulminei are introduced. The taxonomy former sections Chroogomphus and Floccigomphus are elevated to subgeneric level. Comparison of the ITS X[%!?'/\]'!?'*[ of 1.5 %, with the exception of the two species belonging to sect. Fulminei which differ by a minimum of 0.9 %. Ecological specimen data indicate that species of Chroogomphus form basidiomes under members of Pinaceae, with a general preference for species of Pinus. Five European species have been recorded under Picea, while Abies and Larix have also been recorded as tree associates, although the detailed nutritional relationships of the Submitted: 27 November 2017; Accepted: 27 August 2018; Published: 5 September 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • AR TICLE Diversity of Chroogomphus (Gomphidiaceae, Boletales)
    doi:10.5598/imafungus.2018.09.02.04 IMA FUNGUS · 9(2): 271–290 (2018) Diversity of Chroogomphus (Gomphidiaceae, Boletales) in Europe, and ARTICLE typification ofC. rutilus Ross Scambler1,6, Tuula Niskanen1, Boris Assyov2, A. Martyn Ainsworth1, Jean-Michel Bellanger3, Michael Loizides4 , Pierre- Arthur Moreau5, Paul M. Kirk1, and Kare Liimatainen1 1Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK; corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] 2Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 2 Gagarin Str., 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria 3UMR5175, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier, EPHE, INSERM, 1919, route de Mende, F-34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, France 4P.O. box 58499, 3734 Limassol, Cyprus 5Université de Lille, Fac. Pharma. Lille, EA 4483 IMPECS, F – 59000 Lille, France 6 Present address :Department of Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK Abstract: In this study, eight species of Chroogomphus are recognized from Europe: C. britannicus, C. aff. Key words: filiformis 1, C. fulmineus, C. cf. helveticus, C. mediterraneus, C. cf. purpurascens, C. rutilus, and C. subfulmineus. DNA barcode Different candidates for the application of the name C. rutilus are evaluated and the best fit to the description is ITS selected; lecto- and epitypes are chosen to fix the name. Chroogomphus fulmineus and C. mediterraneus are molecular systematics also epitypified and a new species, C. subfulmineus, is described. The infrageneric classification is revised and new taxa a new subgenus Siccigomphus and three new sections, Confusi, Filiformes, and Fulminei are introduced. The taxonomy former sections Chroogomphus and Floccigomphus are elevated to subgeneric level.
    [Show full text]
  • Kew Science Publications for the Academic Year 2017–18
    KEW SCIENCE PUBLICATIONS FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2017–18 FOR THE ACADEMIC Kew Science Publications kew.org For the academic year 2017–18 ¥ Z i 9E ' ' . -,i,c-"'.'f'l] Foreword Kew’s mission is to be a global resource in We present these publications under the four plant and fungal knowledge. Kew currently has key questions set out in Kew’s Science Strategy over 300 scientists undertaking collection- 2015–2020: based research and collaborating with more than 400 organisations in over 100 countries What plants and fungi occur to deliver this mission. The knowledge obtained 1 on Earth and how is this from this research is disseminated in a number diversity distributed? p2 of different ways from annual reports (e.g. stateoftheworldsplants.org) and web-based What drivers and processes portals (e.g. plantsoftheworldonline.org) to 2 underpin global plant and academic papers. fungal diversity? p32 In the academic year 2017-2018, Kew scientists, in collaboration with numerous What plant and fungal diversity is national and international research partners, 3 under threat and what needs to be published 358 papers in international peer conserved to provide resilience reviewed journals and books. Here we bring to global change? p54 together the abstracts of some of these papers. Due to space constraints we have Which plants and fungi contribute to included only those which are led by a Kew 4 important ecosystem services, scientist; a full list of publications, however, can sustainable livelihoods and natural be found at kew.org/publications capital and how do we manage them? p72 * Indicates Kew staff or research associate authors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secotioid Syndrome Author(S): Harry D
    Mycological Society of America The Secotioid Syndrome Author(s): Harry D. Thiers Source: Mycologia, Vol. 76, No. 1 (Jan. - Feb., 1984), pp. 1-8 Published by: Mycological Society of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3792830 Accessed: 18-08-2016 13:56 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3792830?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Mycological Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Mycologia This content downloaded from 152.3.43.180 on Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:56:00 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 76(1) M ycologia January-February 1984 Official Publication of the Mycological Society of America THE SECOTIOID SYNDROME HARRY D. THIERS Department of Biological Sciences, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California 94132 I would like to begin this lecture by complimenting the Officers and Council of The Mycological Society of America for their high degree of cooperation and support during my term of office and for their obvious dedication to the welfare of the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Monograph of Chroogomphus (Gomphidiaceae) 1
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. MONOGRAPH OF CHROOGOMPHUS (GOMPHIDIACEAE) 1 ORSON K. MILLER, }R.2 (WITH 6 FIGURES) The study of the interesting agaric family, Gomphidiaceae, was un­ dertaken in 1958. Since that time collections have been made and examined from Idaho, Washington, Oregon, Montana, and the Upper and Lower Peninsulas of Michigan. Collections from New Hampshire failed to yield any specimens in this genus. All but three of the North American species have been studied from fresh material. In addition, the help of Dave Largent in sending fresh material via air mail from California is acknowledged. A large number of collections of dried material were examined at the University of Michigan Herbarium. Notes and photographs at the University of Michigan Herbarium by C. H. Kauffman and A. H. Smith were made available and invaluable assistance was given by Dr. Smith during the course of this study. I am also indebted to the curators of the following herbaria for the loan of or permission to study material which greatly aided in this study: Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, Stockholm, Sweden; New York State Mu­ seum, Albany; New York Botanical Garden; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; and the Farlow Herbarium, Harvard University. Singer (1949, 1951, 1962) includes two genera in the Gomphidiaceae, namely Gomphidius and Cystogomphus. C:,,stogomphus is a monotypic genus. The remaining species in the family are classified under three subgenera within Gomphidius. These are Chroogomphus, Laricogom­ phus, and Gomphidius. Smith and Dreisinger ( 1954) found that a number of species in Gomphidius contain amyloid (dark blue to violet) tramal hyphae when mounted in Melzer's solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of the Genus Rhizopogon Inferred from Nuclear Ribosomal DNA Large Subunit and Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequences
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Lisa C. Grubisha for the degree of Master of Science in Botany and Plant Pathology presented on June 22, 1998. Title: Systematics of the Genus Rhizopogon Inferred from Nuclear Ribosomal DNA Large Subunit and Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequences. Abstract approved Redacted for Privacy Joseph W. Spatafora Rhizopogon is a hypogeous fungal genus that forms ectomycorrhizae with genera of the Pinaceae. The greatest number and species of Rhizopogon are found in coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwestern United States, where members of the Pinaceae are also concentrated. Rhizopogon spp. are host-specific primarily with Pinus spp. and Pseudotsuga spp. and thus are an important component of these forest ecosystems. Rhizopogon includes over 100 species; however, the systematics of Rhizopogon have not been well understood. Currently the genus is placed in the Boletales, an order of ectomycorrhizal fungi that are primarily epigeous and have a tubular hymenium. Suillus is a stipitate genus closely related to Rhizopogon that is also in the Boletales and host specific with Pinaceae.I examined the relationship of Rhizopogon to Suillus and other genera in the Boletales. Infrageneric relationships in Rhizopogon were also investigated to test current taxonomic hypotheses and species concepts. Through phylogenetic analyses of large subunit and internal transcribed spacer nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences, I found that Rhizopogon and Suillus formed distinct monophyletic groups. Rhizopogon was composed of four distinct groups; sections Amylopogon and Villosuli were strongly supported monophyletic groups. Section Rhizopogon was not monophyletic, and formed two distinct clades. Section Fulviglebae formed a strongly supported group within section Villosuli.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts Keynote 1
    GEO BON OPEN SCIENCE CONFERENCE & ALL HANDS MEETING 2020 06–10 July 2020, 100 % VIRTUAL Book of Abstracts Keynote 1 IPBES: Science and evidence for biodiversity policy and action Anne Larigauderie Executive Secretary of IPBES This talk will start by a presentation of the achievements of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity (IPBES) during its first work programme, starting with the release of its first assessment, on Pollinators, Pollination and Food Production in 2016, and culminating with the release of the first IPBES Global Assessment of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in 2019. The talk will highlights some of the findings of the IPBES Global Assessment, including trends in the contributions of nature to people over the past 50 years, direct and indirect causes of biodiversity loss, and progress against the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, and some of the Sustainable Development Goals, ending with options for action. The talk will then briefly present the new IPBES work programme up to 2030, and its three new topics, and end with considerations regarding GEO BON, and the need to establish an operational global observing system for biodiversity to support the implementation of the post 2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. 1 Keynote 2 Securing Critical Natural Capital: Science and Policy Frontiers for Essential Ecosystem Service Variables Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer Stanford University, USA As governments, business, and lending institutions are increasingly considering investments in natural capital as one strategy to meet their operational and development goals sustainably, the importance of accurate, accessible information on ecosystem services has never been greater. However, many ecosystem services are highly localized, requiring high-resolution and contextually specific information—which has hindered the delivery of this information at the pace and scale at which it is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Chroogomphus Vinicolor • Chroogomphus Rutilus • Chroogomphus Ochraceus
    Application of Semantic Technology to Define Names for Fungi Nathan Wilson Tuesday, July 17, 12 Who am I? • Naturalist • Mycologist • Software Professional • Director of Biodiversity Informatics for EOL • Director of the MBL Center for Library and Informatics Tuesday, July 17, 12 Mushroom Observer http://mushroomobserver.org/ Tuesday, July 17, 12 Linnaeus, We Have a Problem! • Cryptic Species • Paraphyletic & Polyphyletic Groups • Convergent Evolution • Changing Circumscriptions Tuesday, July 17, 12 Cryptic Species Tuesday, July 17, 12 Who spiked the pine? Tuesday, July 17, 12 Candidates • Pine Spike • Chroogomphus vinicolor • Chroogomphus rutilus • Chroogomphus ochraceus Tuesday, July 17, 12 Chroogomphus vinicolor Tuesday, July 17, 12 Para/Polyphyly Tuesday, July 17, 12 What’s white or red and spicy!? © Nathan Wilson © Dimitar Bojantchev © Oluna & Adolf Ceska Tuesday, July 17, 12 Convergent Evolution Tuesday, July 17, 12 Who likes truffles? © Noah Siegel © Mary Smiley © Daniel B. Wheeler © Nathan Wilson © Oluna & Adolf Ceska Tuesday, July 17, 12 Gasteromycetes anyone? © Nathan Wilson © Noah Siegel Tuesday, July 17, 12 Changing Circumscriptions Tuesday, July 17, 12 Definition of a Scientific Name Reference Latin name Type Circumscription Cap: 2-10cm wide; usually overlapping or in a row or a rosette; kidney shaped, also described as fan shaped, sometimes fused laterally; can be flat to wavy; multicolored concentric zoning on the upper surface; zones alternate between Tuesday, July 17, 12 Definition of a Scientific Name Reference Latin name Type
    [Show full text]
  • Complete References List
    Aanen, D. K. & T. W. Kuyper (1999). Intercompatibility tests in the Hebeloma crustuliniforme complex in northwestern Europe. Mycologia 91: 783-795. Aanen, D. K., T. W. Kuyper, T. Boekhout & R. F. Hoekstra (2000). Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Hebeloma based on ITS1 and 2 sequences, with special emphasis on the Hebeloma crustuliniforme complex. Mycologia 92: 269-281. Aanen, D. K. & T. W. Kuyper (2004). A comparison of the application of a biological and phenetic species concept in the Hebeloma crustuliniforme complex within a phylogenetic framework. Persoonia 18: 285-316. Abbott, S. O. & Currah, R. S. (1997). The Helvellaceae: Systematic revision and occurrence in northern and northwestern North America. Mycotaxon 62: 1-125. Abesha, E., G. Caetano-Anollés & K. Høiland (2003). Population genetics and spatial structure of the fairy ring fungus Marasmius oreades in a Norwegian sand dune ecosystem. Mycologia 95: 1021-1031. Abraham, S. P. & A. R. Loeblich III (1995). Gymnopilus palmicola a lignicolous Basidiomycete, growing on the adventitious roots of the palm sabal palmetto in Texas. Principes 39: 84-88. Abrar, S., S. Swapna & M. Krishnappa (2012). Development and morphology of Lysurus cruciatus--an addition to the Indian mycobiota. Mycotaxon 122: 217-282. Accioly, T., R. H. S. F. Cruz, N. M. Assis, N. K. Ishikawa, K. Hosaka, M. P. Martín & I. G. Baseia (2018). Amazonian bird's nest fungi (Basidiomycota): Current knowledge and novelties on Cyathus species. Mycoscience 59: 331-342. Acharya, K., P. Pradhan, N. Chakraborty, A. K. Dutta, S. Saha, S. Sarkar & S. Giri (2010). Two species of Lysurus Fr.: addition to the macrofungi of West Bengal.
    [Show full text]