DOCSLIB.ORG

The Regional Municipality of York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Regional Municipality of York Report No. 6 of the Planning and Economic Development Committee Regional Council Meeting of September 24, 2009 2 RICHMOND HILL GO RAIL LINE EXTENSION The Planning and Economic Development Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendations contained in the following report dated August 26, 2009, from the Commissioner of Planning and Development Services. 1. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that: 1. Regional Council endorse the recommendations of the Richmond Hill Layover Facility Environmental Assessment (EA) and Preliminary Design study. 2. The Regional Clerk forward a copy of this report to the Clerks of the Towns of Richmond Hill, Aurora, and Whitchurch-Stouffville, and GO Transit and the Ministry of Transportation. 2. PURPOSE This report seeks Regional Council endorsement of GO Transit’s recommendations on the Richmond Hill Layover Facility Environmental Assessment (EA) and Preliminary Design study. 3. BACKGROUND Richmond Hill GO Rail Line has experienced significant growth and requires capacity improvements Between 1996 and 2001, growth within the Richmond Hill GO Transit Rail Corridor has been significant with the average ridership growing about 10% per year. From 1991 to 2006, the Town of Richmond Hill’s population alone more than doubled and it is expected that ridership will continue to increase as York Region’s projected population contributes to the need for expanded GO Rail service. Various Environmental Assessment (EA) and planning studies have been conducted between 1993 and 2002 to examine the potential for GO service expansion. In 2007, the Province announced MoveOntario 2020 which provided an action plan to build new and improved rapid transit in the GTA and Hamilton area. The extension of the Richmond Hill GO line northerly to Aurora Road was included in the MoveOntario 2020 plan. Report No. 6 of the Planning and Economic Development Committee Regional Council Meeting of September 24, 2009 GO Transit identified need for a new layover facility and GO train stations Currently GO Transit provides four trains in the morning and five trains in the afternoon/evening between Richmond Hill and Union Station. These trains are “dead headed” from the Richmond Hill GO station to the Willowbrook Rail Maintenance Facility in Mimico (near Lakeshore on Toronto’s west end). Dead heading means the movement of empty trains to and from remote overnight storage yards to the station at the end of the rail corridor. GO Transit initiated the Class Environmental Assessment study to consider alternatives and suitable sites for a layover facility to eliminate the dead heading of trains along the Richmond Hill GO rail corridor. This would eliminate wasted fuel, labour, equipment costs, and limited track time. Canadian National (CN) owns the rail tracks and GO must negotiate the use of track time with them. A layover facility would reduce overall train movements, operating costs, and allow additional GO train service expansion along the corridor. In addition, the existing Richmond Hill GO station has reached capacity and commuters have expressed concerns with the amount of available parking spaces and congestion around the station. There is insufficient space and facilities at the Richmond Hill GO station for service expansion. As a result, the study needed to consider the construction of new GO stations to provide service to more riders within and beyond Richmond Hill. New GO Rail facilities would improve transit service levels and system connectivity The Richmond Hill Line is an essential transit service connecting major origins and destinations such as the Richmond Hill Centre, the future Yonge Street subway extension at Langstaff station and Union Station in downtown Toronto. The new Richmond Hill GO Line facilities will provide service improvements through an increase in service area coverage and will result in increased GO Transit ridership on the Richmond Hill Line and in York Region overall. In essence, more York Region residents will have access to downstream GO, Viva/YRT and TTC services through the extended Richmond Hill Line, thus improving the attractiveness of the overall transit system. These improvements to the Line would put additional pressures on downstream GO system capacity and may lead to the advancement of downstream improvements including a grade separation at the Doncaster Diamond (Bayview Avenue and John Street vicinity). Public and agency consultation was carried out as part of the study In 2007, GO Transit contacted a list of agencies and invited public participation in the study. Agencies on their contact list included Provincial, Federal and Municipal agencies, First Nations, and key stakeholders. Meetings with York Region staff were held during 2007 and 2008, and comments were provided to GO Transit representatives. Report No. 6 of the Planning and Economic Development Committee Regional Council Meeting of September 24, 2009 Study Area Corridor extended further north to Aurora Road The original study area corridor extended from Richmond Hill GO station to Bethesda Sideroad. During the consultation process Regional staff suggested that the study area be extended north to Bloomington Road to be consistent with recommendations in the 2002 Transportation Master Plan. In addition to this, the MoveOntario 2020 plan also indicated the GO Richmond Hill line extension to Aurora Road to move people efficiently through York Region. As a result, the study area corridor was extended to Aurora Road in Whitchurch-Stouffville as shown in Council Attachment 1. 4. ANALYSIS AND OPTIONS A new GO Train layover facility recommended at Bethesda Road The Environmental Study Report (ESR) provided some detailed analysis of the preliminary design options considered for the train layover site. The design layout for each site would include provisions for six tracks to store up to six 12-car trains overnight. The yard would be used for storage of trains overnight with minimal maintenance or works on the trains. Alternative locations considered for the train layover facility included: • Bethesda Road Layover site – situated on the south side of the road and on the east side of the CN Rail line. The option would include an additional CN track leading to and from the layover facility with an access road using an existing unpaved private access off Bethesda Road. • Bloomington Road Layover site – situated on the north side of Bloomington Road and on the east side of the CN Rail line. Road access to the site is contemplated through a widening of the existing bridge over Bloomington Road and connecting with a proposed GO station. This option also includes an additional CN track leading to and from the layover facility. • Aurora Road Layover site – situated on the south side of Aurora Road and on the east side of the CN Rail line. The access road would be approximately 800m from Aurora Road with connection to a train station concept. An additional CN track is also required leading to and from the layover facility. Locations were assessed using evaluation criteria including natural environment, socio- economic, cultural, and technical requirements. Each of the facility options require the addition of a CN track for new services and increased train activity. Based on the documented assessment, the preferred alternative for the train layover facility was the Bethesda Road site. The preferred site offered several advantages in comparison to the other sites with the most notable difference being that it had the least net effects on the natural environment. Report No. 6 of the Planning and Economic Development Committee Regional Council Meeting of September 24, 2009 Four locations were assessed for GO Train stations To provide additional service north of the existing Richmond Hill GO station, four alternative station locations were considered. Each of the location options include the provision for an additional future CN track leading to and from the stations. Locations considered were as follows: • Stouffville Road GO station site – situated on the north side of Stouffville Road and on the east side of the CN line. The station would consist of a station platform, building, bus loop, “kiss & ride”, and up to 850 parking spaces (with opportunities for expansion). Access is via Stouffville Road connecting with a slightly realigned Gormley Road East, and new signalization at the intersection. • Bloomington Road GO station site – located on the south side of Bloomington Road and on the east side of the CN line. The station would consist of a station platform, building, bus loop, “kiss & ride”, storm water management pond, and up to 700 parking spaces (with opportunities for expansion and a carpool lot). A signalized access is provided from Bloomington Road via a proposed grade separated access road over the Highway 404 west-south ramp. The Highway 404 west-south ramp will need to be relocated. • Vandorf Sideroad GO station site – located on the north side of Vandorf Sideroad and on the east side of the CN line. The station would consist of a station platform, building, bus loop, “kiss & ride”, and up to 1,070 parking spaces (with opportunities for expansion). Access would be provided from Vandorf Sideroad and the addition of a CN track leading to and from the station involves the construction of a new bridge over Vandorf Sideroad. • Aurora Road GO station site – located on the south side of Aurora Road and on the east side of the CN line. The station would consist of a station platform, building, bus loop, “kiss & ride”, and up to 760 parking spaces (with opportunities for expansion). Access would be provided via Aurora Road with an access road extending approximately 300m to the south. York Region’s Transportation Master Plan recommends three new stations The draft Transportation Master Plan Update has proposed new GO Rail stations at Stouffville Road, Bloomington Road, and Aurora Road as part of an extended Richmond Hill GO Line and of a revised York Region transit network plan. Preferred station locations identified at Stouffville Road and Bloomington Road Based on the evaluation of the preliminary design alternatives, the study recommended the Stouffville Road and Bloomington Road sites for new GO stations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Express Rail Update
    Clause 5 in Report No. 10 of Committee of the Whole was adopted by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on June 23, 2016 with the following additional recommendation: 3. Receipt of the memorandum from Daniel Kostopoulos, Commissioner of Transportation Services, dated June 22, 2016. 5 Regional Express Rail Update Committee of the Whole recommends adoption of the following recommendations contained in the report dated June 1, 2016 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services: 1. Metrolinx be requested to mitigate the impacts of Regional Express Rail service by addressing the gap between their Initial Business Case for Regional Express Rail and York Region’s needs for grade separations, additional GO stations and parking charges. 2. The Regional Clerk circulate this report to Metrolinx, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Clerks of the local municipalities. Report dated June 1, 2016 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services now follows: 1. Recommendations It is recommended that: 1. Metrolinx be requested to mitigate the impacts of Regional Express Rail service by addressing the gap between their Initial Business Case for Regional Express Rail and York Region’s needs for grade separations, additional GO stations and parking charges. 2. The Regional Clerk circulate this report to Metrolinx, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Clerks of the local municipalities. Committee of the Whole 1 June 9, 2016 Regional Express Rail Update 2. Purpose This report provides an update to Council on the Provincial Regional Express Rail (RER) Service Plan and associated staff activities as York Region’s response to the RER Service Plan to be implemented by the Province over the next 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • 9724 Yonge Property Summary
    9724 Yonge St Restaurant - Markha… 4,812 0.78 1957 Single Richmond Hill, ON L4… SF GLA AC Lot Built Tenancy Building Market Conditions Type 2 Star Retail Restaurant Vacancy Rates Current YOY Change Location Suburban Subject Property 0.0% 0.0% Submarket 1-3 Star 2.2% -0.4% GLA 4,812 SF Year Built 1957 Market Overall 1.9% -0.1% Stories 1 Tenancy Single Typical Floor 4,294 SF Owner Occup No Market Rent Per SF Building Ht 17' Submarket 1-3 Star $27.75 2.2% Docks None Market Overall $30.25 2.0% Construction Masonry Submarket Leasing Activity CoStar Est. Rent $28 - 34/SF (Retail) 12 Mo. Leased SF 190,697 19.8% Parking 50 free Surface Spaces are available Months on Market 3.3 5.1 mo Frontage 55' on Yonge St (with 1 curb cut) Submarket Sales Activity Current Prev Year 12 Mo. Sales Volume (Mil.) $31.3 $13.7 Walk Score® Very Walkable (75) 12 Mo. Price Per SF $454 $420 Transit Score® Some Transit (48) Property Contacts Land True Owner Mostafa Fattah Land Acres 0.78 AC Land SF 33,846 SF Recorded Owner 1703173 Ontario Inc Bldg FAR 0.14 Dimensions 122' x 280' Demographics Zoning GC1 Parcel 193806008116000 1 km 3 km Population 16,987 97,521 Tenants Households 7,303 35,933 Median Age 50.00 44.10 Name SF Occupied Median HH Income $59,923 $75,335 London Pub Co. 1,542 SF Daytime Employees 1,715 16,137 7.4% 8.2% Amenities Population Growth '20 to '25 Household Growth '20 to '25 9.7% 10.3% Bus Line Dedicated Turn Lane Traffic Public Transportation Collection Street Cross Street Traffic Vol Year Distance Commuter Rail Drive Distance Yonge Street Harding Boulevard
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations
    Phase 1 Interim Report Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations City of Toronto Prepared for the City of Toronto by IBI Group and Stantec August 30, 2017 IBI GROUP PHASE 1 INTERIM REPORT LAND USE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO RAIL OPERATIONS Prepared for City of Toronto Document Control Page CLIENT: City of Toronto City-Wide Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail PROJECT NAME: Operations Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations REPORT TITLE: Phase 1 Interim Report - DRAFT IBI REFERENCE: 105734 VERSION: V2 - Issued August 30, 2017 J:\105734_RailProximit\10.0 Reports\Phase 1 - Data DIGITAL MASTER: Collection\Task 3 - Interim Report for Phase 1\TTR_CityWideLandUse_Phase1InterimReport_2017-08-30.docx ORIGINATOR: Patrick Garel REVIEWER: Margaret Parkhill, Steve Donald AUTHORIZATION: Lee Sims CIRCULATION LIST: HISTORY: Accessibility This document, as of the date of issuance, is provided in a format compatible with the requirements of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), 2005. August 30, 2017 IBI GROUP PHASE 1 INTERIM REPORT LAND USE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO RAIL OPERATIONS Prepared for City of Toronto Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Background .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolinx's Draft 2041 Regional Transportation Plan
    Corporate &Financial Services Department Office of the Clerk December 14, 2017 Mr. Christopher Raynor, Regional Clerk DEC 1 8 Z017 Regional Municipality of York 17250 Yonge Street Newmarket, ON L3Y 6Z1 Dear Mr. Raynor, Re: Richmond Hill Resolution- (Staff Report SRPRS.17.179)- Metrolinx's Draft 2041 Regional Transportation Plan Richmond Hill Town Council, at its meeting held on November 27, 2017, adopted the following resolution: a) That staff report SRPRS.17 .179 regarding Metrolinx's Draft 2041 Regional Transportation Plan be received; b) That Metrolinx be advised that the Yonge North Subway Extension is the top transit priority for the Town of Richmond Hill, and that the Town requests Metrolinx to seek opportunities to advance the funding and construction of the Yonge North Subway Extension within the timeframe of the 2041 Regional Transportation Plan, setting a target date of no later than 2031 for the opening of the extension (the same target date adopted by York Region Council on November 16, 2017 in respect to its' consideration of the Draft Metrolinx 2041 Regional Transportation Plan); c) That Metrolinx be requested to advance the timing of Regional Express Rail Service (frequent all-day and two-way service) on the Richmond Hill GO Rail Line within the timeframe of the 2041 Regional Transportation Plan; d) That Metrolinx be requested to consider the addition of a Grade Separation project on Elgin Mills Road at the Richmond Hill GO Rail Line, as part of identifying a Freight Cluster at this location in the Draft 2041 Regional Transportation Plan, setting a target date of no later than 2031 for completion of the grade separation; e) That Metrolinx be requested to reconsider including a GO Station or Mobility Hub at 16th Avenue, within the Town's Key Development Area; .
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS
    The Neptis Foundation has collaborated with Edward J. Levy to publish this history of rapid transit proposals for the City of Toronto. Given Neptis’s focus on regional issues, we have supported Levy’s work because it demon- strates clearly that regional rapid transit cannot function eff ectively without a well-designed network at the core of the region. Toronto does not yet have such a network, as you will discover through the maps and historical photographs in this interactive web-book. We hope the material will contribute to ongoing debates on the need to create such a network. This web-book would not been produced without the vital eff orts of Philippa Campsie and Brent Gilliard, who have worked with Mr. Levy over two years to organize, edit, and present the volumes of text and illustrations. 1 Rapid Transit in Toronto levyrapidtransit.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION 7 About this Book 9 Edward J. Levy 11 A Note from the Neptis Foundation 13 Author’s Note 16 Author’s Guiding Principle: The Need for a Network 18 Executive Summary 24 PART ONE: EARLY PLANNING FOR RAPID TRANSIT 1909 – 1945 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNING OF RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING IN TORONTO 25 1.0 Summary 26 1.1 The Story Begins 29 1.2 The First Subway Proposal 32 1.3 The Jacobs & Davies Report: Prescient but Premature 34 1.4 Putting the Proposal in Context CHAPTER 2: “The Rapid Transit System of the Future” and a Look Ahead, 1911 – 1913 36 2.0 Summary 37 2.1 The Evolving Vision, 1911 40 2.2 The Arnold Report: The Subway Alternative, 1912 44 2.3 Crossing the Valley CHAPTER 3: R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Go Rer Initial Business Case Summary | 2015 Go Rer Initial Business Case Summary | 2015 2 Table of Contents
    GO RER INITIAL BUSINESS CASE SUMMARY | 2015 GO RER INITIAL BUSINESS CASE SUMMARY | 2015 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Ready, Set, GO 1.1 Building on success 1 1.2 Fixing the GTHA’s transportation problem 2 1.3 RER in the GTHA: What is being recommended? 4 1.4 Future improvements 10 1.5 How a recommendation was reached 11 2. The Strategic Case: Who Benefits and How 2.1 Making the regional GO system work for more GTHA residents 12 2.2 Electrification: Faster service, lower operating costs, greener environment 17 2.3 SmartTrack coordination 17 3. The Financial Case: How Much Will it Cost? 3.1 A comprehensive cost analysis 18 3.2 Forecasting ridership 18 3.3 Estimating fare revenues 20 3.4 Service levels: Technology and timing 20 3.5 Estimating capital costs 21 3.6 Estimated operating costs 21 3.7 Overall cost and revenue comparison 21 4. The Economic Case: How Much Would it Benefit the GTHA? 4.1 The benefits of mobility for over 7 million people 22 4.2 Benefits 22 4.3 Calculating net benefits 23 4.4 Benefit:cost ratio 24 5. Developing RER 5.1 Immediate tasks ahead 26 5.2 Cooperation with municipalities 26 5.3 Engaging stakeholders 27 6. Conclusion Putting the Regional System in Place 28 GO RER INITIAL BUSINESS CASE SUMMARY 1. Ready. Set. GO. 1.1 Building on success Metrolinx is bringing faster, more frequent and more convenient service to one of the most respected regional transit systems on the continent—GO Transit.
    [Show full text]
  • (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016
    Bolton Residential Expansion Study (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016 The purpose of this memorandum is to review the professional literature pertaining to the potential develop- ment of a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in the Bolton Residential Expansion Study area, in response to the Region of Peel’s recent release of the Discussion Paper. The Discussion Paper includes the establishment of evaluation themes and criteria, which are based on provincial and regional polices, stakeholder and public comments. It should be noted that while the Discussion Paper and the Region’s development of criteria does not specifi- cally advocate for TOD, it is the intent of this memorandum to illustrate that TOD-centric planning will not only adequately address such criteria, but will also complement and enhance the Region’s planning principles, key points and/or themes found in stakeholder and public comments. In the following are research findings related to TOD generally, and specifically, theMetrolinx Mobility Hub Guidelines For The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (September 2011) objectives. Additionally, following a review and assessment of the “Response to Comments Submitted on the Bolton Residential Expansion Study ROPA” submission prepared by SGL Planning & Design Inc. (March 15, 2016), this memorandum evaluates some of the key arguments and assumptions made in this submission relative to the TOD research findings. Planning for Transit-Oriented Developments TOD policy and programs can result in catalytic development that creates walkable, livable neighborhoods around transit providing economic, livability and equitable benefits. The body of research on TODs in the United States has shown that TODs are more likely to succeed when project planning takes place in conjunction with transit system expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 9 Multiple Category Evaluation - Findings and Conclusions
    Appendix 9 Multiple Category Evaluation - Findings and Conclusions December 2010 APPENDIX 9 Multiple Category Evaluation - Findings and Conclusions December 2010 Prepared for: Prepared by: 20 Bay Street, Suite 901 Toronto ON M5J 2N8 In Association with: APPENDIX 9 MULTIPLE CATEGORY EVALUATION ‐ FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ vii 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Background .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Study Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.3. Document Structure ................................................................................................................. 1 2. Evaluation Process ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.1. Reference case ......................................................................................................................... 2 2.2. Evaluation Process ................................................................................................................... 5 2.3. High Level Evaluation Findings and Conclusions .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GO Transit's Deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan
    GO Transit’s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan GO Transit’s 2020 Service Plan describes GO’s commitment to customers, existing and new, Success… and challenge: Union Station. to provide a dramatically expanded interregional transit option that integrates fully with the About 95% of GO Train customers travel RTP rapid transit network, and addresses the future travel needs in the Greater Golden to or from Union Station. During the peak Horseshoe. Further analysis during the planning and design of individual services will detail the hour, 45,000 customers use GO Transit’s service outline presented here, and define the appropriate technology, rail corridor improve - seven tracks and six platforms – the most ments, bus priority measures, passenger facilities, fleet growth, operational growth, and other intensive use of a train station in North activities needed to build the service. America. GO Transit has invested in more stairways, passenger waiting areas, This 2020 Service Plan summarizes the frequency and extent of service to be offered on and communications systems to handle major corridors, and is consistent with the infrastructure improvements and technologies the growing traffic through this “mobility included in the Metrolinx RTP and GO Transit’s vision and objectives described above. hub.” The adjacent Union Station GO Bus The plan reflects a significantly more proactive approach to service development than the Terminal provides convenient access to incremental, business-case driven approach that has guided GO’s growth for the past 15 express “train-bus” service between Union years. GO Transit will provide an attractive travel option that will compete successfully with Station and GO stations when trains are not automobile use for peak and off-peak trips between Urban Growth Centres identified in scheduled to run.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report 2016
    Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the efforts of former Metrolinx Accessibility Advisory Committee (AAC) members Mr. Sean Henry and Mr. Brian Moore, both of whom stepped down from the AAC in 2016. They provided valuable input into our accessibility planning efforts. We would like to welcome Mr. Gordon Ryall and Ms. Heather Willis, who both joined the Metrolinx AAC in 2015. Lastly, we would like to thank all of the Metrolinx AAC members for the important work they do as volunteers to improve the accessibility of our services. Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report: 2016 1. Introduction The 2016 Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report provides an annual update of the Metrolinx Multi-Year Accessibility Plan published in December 2012, as well as the 2015 Metrolinx Accessibility Status Report. Metrolinx, a Crown agency of the Province of Ontario under the responsibility of the Ministry of Transportation, has three operating divisions: GO Transit, PRESTO and Union Pearson Express. This Status Report, in conjunction with the December 2012 Metrolinx Multi-Year Accessibility Plan, fulfills Metrolinx’s legal obligations for 2016 under the Ontarians with Disabilities Act (ODA), to publish an annual accessibility plan; and also under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), to publish an annual status report on its multi-year plan. The December 2012 Metrolinx Multi-Year Accessibility Plan and other accessibility planning documents can be referenced on the Metrolinx website at the following link: www.metrolinx.com/en/aboutus/accessibility/default.aspx. In accordance with the AODA, it must be updated every five years. Metrolinx, including its operating divisions, remains committed to proceeding with plans to ensure AODA compliance.
    [Show full text]
  • York Region Council Report - January 31, 2019 the Regional Municipality of York
    Attachment 3 - York Region Council Report - January 31, 2019 The Regional Municipality of York Regional Council Transportation Services January 31, 2019 Report of the Commissioner of Transportation Services Metrolinx Pursuing Market-Driven Approach to New GO Stations 1. Recommendations 1. Council requests Metrolinx, as part of its consideration of a development-driven approach to GO Expansion station implementation, to include: a) Potential stations at Kirby and Mulock on the Barrie Corridor, as per the original GO Regional Express Rail plan b) Potential stations at Concord, 15th Sideroad on the Barrie Corridor, John Street, 16th Avenue, 19th Avenue on the Richmond Hill Corridor, and Denison/14th Avenue and Major Mackenzie Drive on the Stouffville Corridor, as per the Region’s 2016 Transportation Master Plan. 2. Council specifically requests that Metrolinx ensures adequate parking is implemented at GO Stations as part of the GO Expansion program, to eliminate impacts on adjacent established communities. 2. Summary This report recommends that Council requests Metrolinx, as part of a development-driven approach, to consider a number of new GO stations in York Region as well as the associated parking impacts of the GO Expansion program. Key Points: On January 10, 2019, Council was informed that Metrolinx is pursuing a market- driven approach to delivering new GO stations resulting in a pause on new station work on all new GO stations in the Greater Toronto Hamilton Area, including at Kirby and Mulock stations in the Region, as identified in the Metrolinx 2041 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The Region’s Transportation Master Plan identifies 12 new GO stations in the Region by the year 2041.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving to 2020 – Full Version (PDF 5
    ATTACHMENT 2 Table of Contents Moving to 2020 3 Vision 3 Mission 3 Where We Are Now 4 Transit Life Cycle 4 YRT/Viva at a Glance 5 Existing Transit in York Region 6 Peer System Comparison 7 Achievements 8 Where We Are Going 9 Demographics 9 Land Use 11 Travel Trends 14 How We Are Getting There 18 Strategy 18 Service Delivery 19 Customer Satisfaction 27 Innovation 30 Environmental Sustainability 31 Asset Management 32 Financial Sustainability 33 Performance Measurement 35 Our Commitment 42 Appendix: YRT/Viva Service Guidelines and Performance Indicators 43 1 YRT/Viva 2016-2020 Strategic Plan 2 Moving to 2020 Moving to 2020 Moving to 2020 is the YRT/Viva 2016-2020 Strategic Plan that will guide YRT/Viva through the GTA Rapid Transit Integration phase of the Transit Life Cycle. This plan outlines YRT/Viva’s strategic direction and initiatives to the year 2020. Together with the annual service planning process, and the capital and operating programs, YRT/Viva will translate the strategic direction into actions that improve public transit in York Region. Vision Mission York Region’s vision is about people. It’s about the York Region staff are committed to providing cost places where people live, the systems and services that effective, quality services that respond to the needs of the support and sustain the community, the economy, and the Region’s growing communities. environment. It’s about creating and connecting a strong, York Region’s Transportation Services department caring and safe community. plans, builds, and operates roads and transit services YRT/Viva shares York Region’s vision and understands that respond to the needs of the Region’s growing the importance of transportation in achieving this shared communities.
    [Show full text]