DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix J. Hydraulics Impact Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix J. Hydraulics Impact Assessment Received 21.08.2020 East Derwent Highway Upgrade Development Application Change the document title using the properties option on the Jacobs RibbonProject NameClient Name Appendix J. Hydraulics Impact Assessment Received 21.08.2020 East Derwent Highway Upgrade Hydraulic Impact Assessment IS262318 | A 14 August 2020 Department of State Growth Hydraulic Impact Assessment Department of State Growth Received 21.08.2020 Hydraulic Impact Assessment East Derwent Highway Upgrade Project No: IS262318 Document Title: Hydraulic Impact Assessment Revision: A Date: 28 April 2020 Client Name: Department of State Growth Project Manager: Clayton Johnston Author: Clayton Johnston File Name: IS262318-0000-CH-RPT-0001 Jacobs Australia Pty Limited 100 Melville St, Hobart 7000 GPO Box 1725 Hobart TAS 7001 Australia T +61 3 6221 3711 F +61 3 6221 3766 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2019 Jacobs Australia Pty Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description Author Reviewed Approved A 28/04/2020 Draft for internal review SF AK AK B 14/08/2020 Final Draft for DSG review CJ AK AK i Received 21.08.2020 Hydraulic Impact Assessment Contents 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Project Background ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2.1 Highway trunk drainage, Debomfords Lane ................................................................................................................. 7 1.2.2 Dumbarton Drive trunk drainage...................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.3 Llenroc Street trunk drainage ............................................................................................................................................ 8 1.2.4 Overall Context ........................................................................................................................................................................ 8 1.3 Design Intent ............................................................................................................................................................................ 9 1.4 Previous Flood Records ..................................................................................................................................................... 10 2. Assessment Criteria ............................................................................................................................................ 11 2.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Local Authority Planning Codes ..................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Context Setting ..................................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.2 Interpretation ........................................................................................................................................................................ 11 2.3 Flood Immunity Standards............................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3.1 Terminology ........................................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3.2 Road Authority Standards ................................................................................................................................................ 13 2.3.3 Austroads Guidelines .......................................................................................................................................................... 13 2.3.4 Overview of Standards ....................................................................................................................................................... 14 3. Assessment Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 15 3.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................................................................. 15 3.2 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................................................................. 15 3.2.1 Inputs and Assumptions .................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2.2 Design Flood Events ........................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2.3 Hydrologic Modelling Approach .................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2.3.1 Catchment and Model Development ........................................................................................................................... 15 3.2.3.2 Model Validation .................................................................................................................................................................. 17 3.2.4 Hydraulic Modelling Approach....................................................................................................................................... 17 3.2.4.1 Model and Terrain Development ................................................................................................................................... 17 3.2.4.2 Boundary Conditions .......................................................................................................................................................... 17 3.2.4.3 Roughness and Losses ....................................................................................................................................................... 18 3.2.4.4 Model Validation .................................................................................................................................................................. 18 3.2.4.5 Critical Storms ....................................................................................................................................................................... 18 3.2.4.6 Existing Case Flood Modelling Results ........................................................................................................................ 18 3.3 Proposed Drainage Design............................................................................................................................................... 19 3.3.1 Inputs and Assumptions .................................................................................................................................................... 19 3.3.2 Modelling Approach ........................................................................................................................................................... 19 3.3.3 Hydrologic Modelling Approach .................................................................................................................................... 19 ii Received 21.08.2020 Hydraulic Impact Assessment 3.3.4 Hydraulic Modelling Approach....................................................................................................................................... 20 3.3.4.1 Modelled Components ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 3.3.4.2 Model Development ........................................................................................................................................................... 21 3.3.5 Results ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 3.4 Water Sensitive Urban Design ......................................................................................................................................... 22 3.4.1 Water quality target reductions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Otago Lagoon and Coastal Reserves Activity Plan 2016
    Reserve Activity Plan _______________________________________________________ 2016 - 2020 OTAGO LAGOON AND COASTAL RESERV EEESSS ADVICE PREPARED BY TASFLORA FOR CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL MAY 2016 © Tasflora 2016. This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Commonwealth Copyright Act 1968 , no part (including the format, structure and style) may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without prior written permission from Tasflora. Reserve Activity Plan 2016-2020 Otago Lagoon and Coastal Reserves CONTENTS 1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 5 2 OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................... 5 3 SITE DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................... 5 4 SITE VALUES................................................................................................... 6 4.1 Native flora .................................................................................................. 6 4.2 Native fauna .............................................................................................. 10 4.3 Cultural heritage ....................................................................................... 11 4.3.1 Aboriginal heritage ............................................................................... 11 4.3.2 Historic heritage ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmanian Road Futures
    TASMANIAN ROAD FUTURES FUNDING PRIORITIES 2019 & BEYOND Road Funding Commitments Funding Total Funding Total Funding Total from cost from cost from cost 2019 2019 2019 Greater Hobart Traffic Solution $72.1M $93.8M Includes: East Tamar Highway $6M $7M Northern Road Upgrades State and Federal $44.9M $54.2M State and Federal – Mowbray Connector Midland Highway 10 year plan Control of Macquarie and Davey streets Includes: West Tamar Highway $11.2M $12M Bass Highway – Deloraine to Latrobe Southern Outlet fifth lane Traffic Solution: Pedestrian crossing Campbell Town River Derwent ferry service Gravelly Beach Road to Rosevears Drive Tasman Highway at Myrtle Park Traffic incident response Atkinsons Road and Waldhorn Drive Dorset Roads Package and transport access points Overtaking opportunities between Exeter Bus priorities and active transport initiatives and Batman Highway junction Tomahawk to Gladstone Northern suburbs light rail Resealing and widening north of Batman Prossers Road Highway intersection to Lightwood Hills Road Underground bus transit centre Esk Main Road Left turn lane Motor Road/West Greater Hobart master plan Tamar Highway junction Airport to Evandale Road Improved Hadspen access Urban Congestion Fund State $24M State and Federal $84.7M $0.4m Federal $58.7M State $58M State Bridgewater Bridge $576M Midland Highway 10 year plan $325M Hobart Congestion Package (linked to Federal $236M Federal $111.4M projects in Greater Hobart Traffic Solution) Roads of Strategic Importance: Bass State $25.8M North West Road Upgrades State and Federal $35.7M $50.1M Tasman Highway Intelligent Transport Systems Highway (Wynyard to Marrawah), $606M Hobart to Sorell corridor, Birralee Federal $205M Bass Highway (West of Wynyard), including South East Traffic Solution State and Federal $25.9M $27M Main Road, Old Surry Road/Massey- Brittons Swamp, Wynyard to Smithton passing Greene Drive, Murchison Highway, lanes, access to Boat Harbour Primary School Tasman Highway near Tasmania Golf Club Lyell Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • Bypass Means New Approach for Golfers
    VOL 12 NO 5 AUGUST 2010 Volcanic Drive extended 300 metres for access Bypass means new approach for golfers Catnip Cattery owners Narelle and Lionel Brown are delighted with their state award in the Telstra Tasmanian GOLFERS at the Tea Tree business awards. Golf Club are taking a new approach to the clubhouse as Golf Club Road has been Purrfect awards closed to make way for the new bypass. Access to the golf club is now via Volcanic Drive outcome for which has been extended 300 Golfers can metres to become the new now access the Tea Tree permanent road to the golf Golf Club Catnip Cattery club. from the Brighton Bypass Project Volcanic (northern section) commu- OLD Beach business Cat- growth. Drive nity relations officer Karyn extension. nip Cattery was recently Other winners in the Kennedy said work was pro- named as one of six win- 2010 Telstra Tasmanian Busi- gressing well. ners in the 18th Testra Tas- ness Awards were: “With heavy machinery manian Business Awards • InSPArations Day Spa and trucks in the area, along and the owners couldn’t be of Spreyton – MYOB small with deep cuttings in the more delighted. business award. road, safety is incredibly Narelle and Lionel • Maintenance Systems important,” she said. Brown were recently named Solutions of Shearwater – “Parents and grandpar- winners in the business Panasonic Australia medium ents with young children are owner micro-business business award. asked to talk about these awards category. • Insight4 of Hobart – safety risks with their chil- Mr Brown said Catnip AMP innovation award. dren. enter the site.” traders are finding it a little struction continued.
    [Show full text]
  • Congestion in Greater Hobart
    Congestion in Greater Hobart Summary report July 2011 Department of Infrastructure, 1 Energy and Resources CONTENTS 1 Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 2 What influences congestion ............................................................................................. 3 3 Measuring congestion ...................................................................................................... 3 4 Community responses to congestion ............................................................................... 4 4.1 Major infrastructure responses ................................................................................. 4 4.2 One way streets ........................................................................................................ 5 5 DIER’s approach to managing congestion ...................................................................... 5 5.1 What is DIER doing? ................................................................................................ 5 2 1 SUMMARY • The Department of Infrastructure Energy and Resources (DIER) has developed a report on congestion in Greater Hobart which outlines the influences of congestion and the approach DIER is undertaking to manage congestion. • DIER recognises that there is community concern regarding congestion on key urban roads in Greater Hobart and that appropriate measures need to be put in place to manage traffic growth and delays. • DIER’s strategic planning
    [Show full text]
  • Brighton Bypass
    2009 (No. 10) 2009 _______________ PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA _______________ PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS Brighton Bypass ______________ Presented to His Excellency the Governor pursuant to the provisions of the Public Works Committee Act 1914. ______________ MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE Legislative Council House of Assembly Mr Harriss (Chairman) Mr Best Mr Hall Mr Green Mrs Napier By Authority: Government Printer, Tasmania 00000 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND..............................................................................................................................3 SCOPE OF WORKS....................................................................................................................... 7 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS ....................................................... 14 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION...................................................................................... 24 SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS ..........................................................................................................25 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BENEFITS...........................................................................26 PROJECT COSTS .........................................................................................................................28 EVIDENCE .....................................................................................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • STRATEGIC MASTER PLAN ROYAL TASMANIAN BOTANICAL GARDENS Prepared for Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens Board
    Final STRATEGIC MASTER PLAN ROYAL TASMANIAN BOTANICAL GARDENS prepared for Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens Board Inspiring Place Pty Ltd April 2009 Final STRATEGIC MASTER PLAN ROYAL TASMANIAN BOTANICAL GARDENS prepared for Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens Board Inspiring Place Pty Ltd Environmental Planning, Landscape Architecture, Tourism & Recreation 208 Collins St Hobart TAS 7000 T: 03) 6231-1818 F: 03) 6231 1819 E: [email protected] ACN 58 684 792 133 in association with Anna Housego Strategic Communications and Interpretation Godden Mackay Logan Pty Ltd Heritage Consultants Alan Matchett Dunedin Botanic Gardens and assisted and/or advised by David Parham Austral Archaeology Pty Ltd Lindy Scripps Consultant Historian Brian and Ros Correy Myriad Research Pty Ltd Date Version 12.07 Draft Values Issues and Opportunities Report to Project Steering Committee and RTBG Board 03.08 Draft SMP for review by Project Steering Committee and RTBG Board 04.08.08 Preliminary Draft for Steering Committee and Board Review Prior to Public Consultation 10.12.08 Draft for Public Consultation 18.05.09 Final Report IP Project No. 07-15/06-HH TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Introducing the Project .................................................................... 1 1.1 Background to the Project ....................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of the SMP ................................................................................................ 6 1.3 Approach to SMP ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brighton Structure Plan
    Brighton Structure Plan June 2009 Ref: 38318-001 Document Control Document ID: P:\URBAN\CURRENT PROJECTS\38318 BRIGHTON STRUCTURE PLAN\REPORT\PDF JUNE 09\REPORT REV 6.DOC Rev No Date Revision Details Typist Author Verifier Approver 0 17.11.08 Partial Draft – Stage 1 SA SA RM RM 1 04.12.08 Partial Draft – Stage 1 – Revised SA SA RM RM 2 24.03.09 Provisional Draft Report (Revised scope) SA SA RM RM 3 06.04.09 Final Draft Report SA SA RH (client) RM 4 12.05.09 Final Report SA SA RH (client) RM 5 18.05.09 Final Report following Planning Committee comments SA SA RH (client) RM 6 03.06.09 Final Report following Council and DIER comments SA SA RH (client) RM A person using Connell Wagner documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Connell Wagner. Brighton Structure Plan Brighton Council Contents Section Page 1. Executive Summary 3 2. Introduction 4 2.1 Context 4 2.2 The Project 5 2.3 Structure Plan Process and Stages 5 3. Vision 7 4. Existing Conditions and Site Analysis 8 4.1 Location 8 4.2 Physical Form 8 4.3 Transport 8 4.4 Infrastructure 11 4.5 Natural Environment 11 4.6 Heritage and Cultural Significance 13 4.7 SWOT Analysis 14 5. Policy and Strategic Planning Context 16 5.1 Introduction 16 5.2 State 16 5.3 Regional 17 5.4 Local 22 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Automotive Automotive
    Automotive Automotive 10 Batteries Car Sales Battery Shop Senior Shopper 15% discount off RRP on all batteries. Free fitting Find your perfect new car at the best possible price. by qualified mechanics during business hours. Call us with the make, model and your best price and let Excludes any other offer. us shop for you. Sorell 41 Cole Street 6265 1066 1300 366 265 Mornington 4/21 South Arm Highway 6244 3333 w seniorshopper.com.au Lindisfarne 109 East Derwent Highway 6243 7474 e [email protected] Huntingfield1 Ascot Drive 6229 5777 Hobart 114 Warwick Street 6234 2288 Cleaning & Detailing Moonah 63 Charles Street 6272 4441 Automotive Claremont 10 Main Road 6249 8400 Bumper to Bumper Car Detailing Invermay 217 Invermay Road 6326 2655 20% discount off all services on presentation of Card. w www.batteryshop.com.au Mowbray 9 Derby Street 0419 336 809 e [email protected] e [email protected] Marshall Batteries Gloss Boss Detailing 15% discount off RRP on all batteries. Free fitting 10% discount off all services on presentation of Card. and delivery during business hours. 24/7 emergency roadside service. Devonport 86 Hiller Street 0417 133 248 e [email protected] Invermay 1 Invermay Road 6326 6680 Bellerive 96 Clarence Street 6244 8377 Hobart 7 Warwick Street 6231 5700 Licences Sorell 4 Gordon Street 6269 3540 Registration and Licensing Services South Burnie 26 Strahan Street 6431 5116 No licence fee for drivers aged 65 years or over, East Devonport 189 Tarleton Street 6427 9977 however, a photo fee is payable. Smithton 3 Bacon Factory Road 6452 1526 1300 13 55 13 w www.marshallbatteries.com.au e [email protected] w www.transport.tas.gov.au e [email protected] 11 Repairs, Parts & Accessories Berklee Exhaust & Automotive 10% discount off parts only excluding any special offers.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Hobart Transport Data
    Background Paper 3: Greater Hobart Transportation Document title 1 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Transport Corridors ............................................................................................................................... 2 Major Corridors ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Northern Corridor .............................................................................................................................. 3 Eastern Corridor ................................................................................................................................ 3 Southern Corridor .............................................................................................................................. 3 Congestion ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Hobart Traffic Origin-Destination Report 2017 ...................................................................................... 6 Morning Peak Destinations (7:30am to 9:30am) ................................................................................ 6 Afternoon Peak Origins (4:30pm to 6:30pm) ...................................................................................... 6 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Derwent Estuary Saltmarsh Report, July 2020
    Planning for the future Derwent Estuary Saltmarsh Baseline Monitoring and Management July 2020 Inger Visby (Derwent Estuary Program) & Vishnu Prahalad (University of Tasmania) The Derwent Estuary Program (DEP) is a regional partnership between local governments, the Tasmanian State Government, businesses, scientists, and community-based groups to restore and promote our estuary. The DEP was established in 1999 and has been nationally recognised for excellence in coordinating initiatives to reduce water pollution, conserve habitats and species, monitor river health and promote greater use and enjoyment of the foreshore. Our major sponsors include Brighton, Clarence, Derwent Valley, Glenorchy, Hobart and Kingborough councils, the Tasmanian State Government, TasWater, Tasmanian Ports Corporation, Norske Skog Boyer, Nyrstar Hobart Smelter and Hydro Tasmania. Page 2 of 67 Contents 1 Project summary ............................................................................................................................. 5 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Saltmarshes - importance and threats .................................................................................... 7 2.2 Derwent Estuary Conservation Action Plan ............................................................................ 8 2.3 Vegetation community status and priority actions ................................................................ 8 2.4
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Premier and Cabinet
    Department of State Growth Salamanca Building, Parliament Square 4 Salamanca Place, Hobart TAS 7000 GPO Box 536, Hobart TAS 7001 Australia Phone 1800 030 688 Fax (03) 6233 5800 Email [email protected] Web www.stategrowth.tas.gov.au John Ramsay Delegate (Chair) The Tasmanian Planning Commission Level 3, 144 Macquarie Street HOBART TAS 7000 By email: [email protected] Clarence draft Local Provisions Schedule hearing - further information directions Dear Mr Ramsay Responses to the directions to provide further information dated the 16 and 20 November 2020 issued to the Department of State Growth (State Growth) are set out in the attached table. Please contact Lucy Thorne, A/G Manager Planning Policy, on (03)6166 3481 or by email at [email protected] who can arrange for the relevant officers to address further questions in relation to this submission. Yours sincerely James Verrier Director Transport Systems and Planning Policy 27 November 2020 Cc: [email protected] Attachment: Further information table Attachment – Further information table Directions issued 16 November 2020 Direction Advertised maps DSG response 3.1 (a) Rural Living Zone (Area B) to Rural Living Zone (Area A) at: i. the Acton Densification of existing urban areas compared to growth in peri-urban areas is generally preferred by State Growth. It is also assumed based on Park/Cambridge existing land development controls and the relevant regional land use strategy for example, for transport network (State Roads and Passenger corridor Transport) planning purposes. State Road’s draft Rokeby Corridor Planning study for South Arm Road between Pass and Acton Roads only assumed a low growth rate in through traffic ie.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Budget Estimates 2008-2009 — (February 2009
    Senate Standing Committee on Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE Additional Budget Estimates February 2009 Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government Question No.: NBII 01 Division: Nation Building – Infrastructure Investment Topic: Maintenance Funding for Tasman and Brooker Highways Hansard Page: 25 (24/02/09) Senator Bushby asked: Senator BUSHBY—During the campaign prior to the last election, the then opposition undertook to extend Tasmania’s national network to include the Brooker Highway from Granton to the Port of Hobart and the Tasman Highway from Hobart to the Hobart airport. Has this been achieved yet? Mr Rokvic—The government has formalised the arrangements to extend the Brooker Highway. Senator BUSHBY—Does that mean that you have taken over control and responsibility? Mr Rokvic—That enables the state to utilise maintenance funding in relation to maintenance on the highway. Senator BUSHBY—Those sections of those two highways now have the same status as other national roads? Mr Rokvic—Correct, Senator. Senator BUSHBY—What date did that take effect? Ms McNally—That was in February 2009. Mr Rokvic—Early February 2009. Senator BUSHBY—Just very recently. Mr Rokvic—Correct. Senator BUSHBY—Has the Department revised any of its estimates for costings as a result of the responsibility for taking over those two sections? Mr Rokvic—The maintenance funding that has been provided provides for the Brooker Highway. Senator BUSHBY—Has it increased as a result of taking on those two? Mr Rokvic—The funding is as committed by the government. It was $31 million for maintenance funding plus the additional $1 million provided as part of the nation building.
    [Show full text]