DOCSLIB.ORG

The Subjective Universe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Subjective Universe The Subjective Universe 1. The Visible Universe: From our prospective, when we look out in space, we are also looking back in time. The further out the objects, the younger they are. The furthest back we could see is when the Universe became transparent and the photons of the cosmic microwave background radiation originated at this time. The Universe is about 13.8 billion years old. Therefore, when we look back in time, we can see 13.8 billion years history of the Universe. The Moon was about 2 seconds from the past, the Sun was about 8 minutes from the past, the first galaxies (Galaxy GN-z11) that was 13.4 billion years ago (or 400 million years from the beginning of the Universe) and the cosmic microwave background was about 13.8 billion years from the past near the beginning of time. When observer at our location looked back in time say 5 billion years ago, we could only see about 8.8 billion years of the history of the Universe. They too could only see up to the cosmic microwave background that was about 8.8 billion years in the past, and the first galaxy (Galaxy B), that was 8.4 billion years ago (400 million years from the beginning of the Universe). When observer at our location looked back in time say 10 billion years ago, we could only see about 3.8 billion years of the history of the Universe. They too could only see up to the cosmic microwave background that was about 3.8 billion years in the past, and the first galaxy (Galaxy C), which was 3.4 billion years ago (400 million years from the beginning of the Universe). Today & from our prospective, Galaxy B is 8.4 still billion years from our past. However, it should be around 5.4 billion years old (from the beginning of the Universe) Galaxy C is still 3.4 billion years from our past. However, it should be around 10.4 billion years old (from the beginning of the Universe) 2. What’s Now: It takes more than 8 minutes for light to travel from the Sun to Earth. If the Sun exploded 4 minutes or so ago, we will not know it or experience anything until 4 minutes later. So, would that explosion be an event of our past or an event in our future? It takes about 2 seconds for light to travel from the Moon to Earth. Imagine that we are communicating with people on the Moon with very powerful telescopes. When we wave at them, they will not see it until 2 seconds later. When we see them waving, it was what had happened 2 seconds ago. We can never communicate with each other “at the same time”. Or we never exist in each other’s world “at the same time” – we can only see others in their past & be seen in their future. When we communicate with people on the other side of the Earth, the delay is only a detectable split second. Even when we communicate with the people in the same room, there is also an undetectable time delay. In our normal experience in life, we could not feel the time lags. In our mind, we have this “now” concept. That is everything in this Universe exist with us “at the same time” – or we exist in the horizontal slice of Space-Time. However, everything else we are experiencing now are all from the past - along the backward cone shape slice of Space-Time. The galaxies we see are from millions or billions of years ago. The Sun we see is 8 plus minutes from the past. Even the computer screen we see is from a tiny split seconds ago. Nothing in our experience is in real time. All distance between two objects is measured along the backward cone shape slice of Space-Time. To an observer, time is the change from one backward cone shape slice of Space- Time to another, and not from one horizontal slice of Space-Time to another. Objects on the horizontal slice of Space-Time are merely objects at the same age (from the beginning of time). The horizontal slice of Space-Time is meaningless to any observer. 3. The cosmic microwave background: At any time & location, the observer could only see as far back as when the photons were released near the beginning of the Universe - the cosmic microwave background. Beyond that is an opaque sphere of the early Universe. The cosmic microwave background is the Universe near the beginning of time, and when the Universe is cooled down enough to allow photons to be released. It is often described as “leftover” thermal radiation from the time of recombination in Big Bang cosmology. This gives the impression that when we look back in time, somehow we see our part of the Universe in the past. The Moon we see now is a part of the Universe couple of seconds in the past. The Sun we see now is a part of the Universe eight minutes or so in the past. The first galaxy we see now is a part of the Universe 13.4 billion years in the past. Those are the past of other part of the Universe – not our past. The same is true for the cosmic microwave background, which is the past of other part of the Universe – not our past. As time moves on, every moment the cosmic microwave background will present a different part of the Universe. 4. The Subjective Universe: When an observer at our location looked back in time say 5 billion years ago, Galaxy GN-z11 (the first galaxy we can see at current time) did not exist or not visible to the observer. It was still in the opaque sphere behind the cosmic microwave background. When observer at our location looked back in time say 10 billion years ago, both Galaxy GN-z11 & B did not exist in their Visible Universe. They were still in the opaque sphere behind the cosmic microwave background. It seems as time moves on space & energy/material are released into our Visible Universe from the opaque sphere behind the cosmic microwave background. 10 billion years ago, Galaxy C was near the expanding sphere. 5 billion years ago, it was Galaxy B near the expanding sphere. At that time, Galaxy C would be far away from the expanding sphere & with a much slower moving away speed. Today, it is Galaxy GN-z11 near the expanding sphere. At that time, Galaxy B & C would be far away from the expanding sphere & with a much slower moving away speed. We would like to think that we are objective. Unfortunately, we can only be subjective. Our observation tells us that the objects in the Universe are moving away from us. In addition, the moving away speed of an object is generally proportional to the object’s distance from us. This had gave us the impression that the space must be expanding. However, the observation of objects moving away with the speed proportionally to their distance is looking back in time – or along the backward cone slice of Space-Time. The interpretation of expanding space is based on everything happens “at the same time” or along the horizontal slice of Space-Time. As discussed, the horizontal slice of Space-Time is meaningless to any observer. In the Big Bang Cosmology, the space expanded at almost infinite rate at the beginning of time. This is to think that the expansion was from one horizontal slice of Space-Time to another. As discussed before, the horizontal slice of Space-Time is meaningless to any observer. From our prospective, the cosmic microwave background & the opaque sphere behind it is expanding with time. As the sphere expands, it leaves or releases space, energy/material into our Visible Universe. Objects near the sphere - such as Galaxy GN-z11, were objects just released into our Visible Universe. Their observed moving away speed are very fast. Objects closer to us – such as Galaxy B & C, were objects that had been inside our Visible Universe for some times. Their moving away speed are much slower. In a way, the moving away speed of all objects would have to slow down to allow new objects to be released into our Visible Universe. “The moving away speed of an object is generally proportional to the object’s distance from us” has nothing to do with the expansion of space or the slowing down of space expansion. Moreover, we could consider the Space-Time, the Universe in its totality as a database, and the observers are functioned as applications. At any point & time, the Universe is putting out a show for the observer & with the observer in the center & the sphere expanding out at speed of light, leaving behind space, material/energy & time. Endless shows are being performed simultaneously at different location/time. Outside every sphere, there is the same infinitely dense dot in the middle of nothingness. Lo-Li Chih Rewrote February 2017 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lecture 2 Our Place in the Universe (Cont'd)
    Astronomy 110 –1 Lecture 2 Our Place in the Universe (Cont’d) 14/01/09 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. A few useful mathematical skills 14/01/09 2 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Powers of ten 103 = 10 x 10 x 10 = 1000 102 = 10 x 10 = 100 101 = 10 100 = 1 10-1 = 1/10 = 0.1 10-2 = 1/10 x 1/10 = 0.01 10-3 = 1/10 x 1/10 x 1/10 = 0.001 Then: 300 = 3 x 100 = 3 x 102 2,500 = 2.5 x 1000 = 2.5 x 103 14/01/09 3 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Multiplying & dividing 101 x 101 = 100 = 102 101 x 102 = 10 x 100 = 1000 = 103 102 x 102 = 100 x 100 = 10000 = 104 When multiplying two powers of ten, add the exponents 1000 ÷ 100 = 103 ÷ 102 = 10 = 101 10 ÷ 10 = 101 ÷ 101 = 1 = 100 10 ÷ 100 = 101 ÷ 102 = 1/10 = 10-1 When dividing, subtract exponent of divisor from exponent of numerator 14/01/09 4 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Powers and roots (104)3 = 104 x 104 x 104 = 1012 Rule of thumb: when raising to a power, multiply exponents What about √(104)? √(104) = 102 taking roots is the same as raising to a fractional power, in this case 1/2 power: √(104) = (104)1/2 = 102 √ is the same as raising to 1/2 power 3√ is the same as raising to 1/3 power 4√ is the same as raising to 1/4 power 14/01/09 5 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Analysis of Article "21 Reasons to Believe the Earth Is Young" by Jeff Miller
    1 Critical analysis of article "21 Reasons to Believe the Earth is Young" by Jeff Miller Lorence G. Collins [email protected] Ken Woglemuth [email protected] January 7, 2019 Introduction The article by Dr. Jeff Miller can be accessed at the following link: http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=9&article=5641 and is an article published by Apologetic Press, v. 39, n.1, 2018. The problems start with the Article In Brief in the boxed paragraph, and with the very first sentence. The Bible does not give an age of the Earth of 6,000 to 10,000 years, or even imply − this is added to Scripture by Dr. Miller and other young-Earth creationists. R. C. Sproul was one of evangelicalism's outstanding theologians, and he stated point blank at the Legionier Conference panel discussion that he does not know how old the Earth is, and the Bible does not inform us. When there has been some apparent conflict, either the theologians or the scientists are wrong, because God is the Author of the Bible and His handiwork is in general revelation. In the days of Copernicus and Galileo, the theologians were wrong. Today we do not know of anyone who believes that the Earth is the center of the universe. 2 The last sentence of this "Article In Brief" is boldly false. There is almost no credible evidence from paleontology, geology, astrophysics, or geophysics that refutes deep time. Dr. Miller states: "The age of the Earth, according to naturalists and old- Earth advocates, is 4.5 billion years.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth: Atmospheric Evolution of a Habitable Planet
    Earth: Atmospheric Evolution of a Habitable Planet Stephanie L. Olson1,2*, Edward W. Schwieterman1,2, Christopher T. Reinhard1,3, Timothy W. Lyons1,2 1NASA Astrobiology Institute Alternative Earth’s Team 2Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside 3School of Earth and Atmospheric Science, Georgia Institute of Technology *Correspondence: [email protected] Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 2 2. Oxygen and biological innovation .................................................................................... 3 2.1. Oxygenic photosynthesis on the early Earth .......................................................... 4 2.2. The Great Oxidation Event ......................................................................................... 6 2.3. Oxygen during Earth’s middle chapter ..................................................................... 7 2.4. Neoproterozoic oxygen dynamics and the rise of animals .................................. 9 2.5. Continued oxygen evolution in the Phanerozoic.................................................. 11 3. Carbon dioxide, climate regulation, and enduring habitability ................................. 12 3.1. The faint young Sun paradox ................................................................................... 12 3.2. The silicate weathering thermostat ......................................................................... 12 3.3. Geological
    [Show full text]
  • The Solar System
    The Solar System Our automated spacecraft have traveled to the Moon and to all the planets beyond our world The Sun appears to have been active for 4.6 billion years and has enough fuel for another 5 except Pluto; they have observed moons as large as small planets, flown by comets, and billion years or so. At the end of its life, the Sun will start to fuse helium into heavier elements sampled the solar environment. The knowledge gained from our journeys through the solar and begin to swell up, ultimately growing so large that it will swallow Earth. After a billion years system has redefined traditional Earth sciences like geology and meteorology and spawned an as a "red giant," it will suddenly collapse into a "white dwarf" -- the final end product of a star like entirely new discipline called comparative planetology. By studying the geology of planets, ours. It may take a trillion years to cool off completely. moons, asteroids, and comets, and comparing differences and similarities, we are learning more about the origin and history of these bodies and the solar system as a whole. We are also Mercury gaining insight into Earth's complex weather systems. By seeing how weather is shaped on other worlds and by investigating the Sun's activity and its influence through the solar system, Obtaining the first close-up views of Mercury was the primary objective of the Mariner 10 we can better understand climatic conditions and processes on Earth. spacecraft, launched Nov 3, 1973. After a journey of nearly 5 months, including a flyby of Venus, the spacecraft passed within 703 km (437 mi) of the solar system's innermost planet on Mar 29, The Sun 1974.
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Rapid Appearance of Life on Earth Suggest That Life Is Common in the Universe?
    ASTROBIOLOGY Volume 2, Number 3, 2002 © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Does the Rapid Appearance of Life on Earth Suggest that Life Is Common in the Universe? CHARLES H. LINEWEAVER 1,2 and TAMARA M. DAVIS 1 ABSTRACT It is sometimes assumed that the rapidity of biogenesis on Earth suggests that life is common in the Universe. Here we critically examine the assumptions inherent in this if-life-evolved- rapidly-life-must-be-common argument. We use the observational constraints on the rapid- ity of biogenesis on Earth to infer the probability of biogenesis on terrestrial planets with the same unknown probability of biogenesis as the Earth. We find that on such planets, older than ,1 Gyr, the probability of biogenesis is .13% at the 95% confidence level. This quan- tifies an important term in the Drake Equation but does not necessarily mean that life is com- mon in the Universe. Key Words: Biogenesis—Drake Equation. Astrobiology 2, 293–304. THE BIOGENESIS LOTTERY duction–oxidation pairs are common (Nealson and Conrad, 1999). UCHOFCURRENTASTROBIOLOGICALRESEARCH Mis focused on learning more about the early It is difficult to translate this circumstantial ev- evolution of the Earth and about the origin of life. idence into an estimate of how common life is in We may be able to extrapolate and generalize our the Universe. Without definitive detections of ex- knowledge of how life formed here to how it traterrestrial life we can say very little about how might have formed elsewhere. Indirect evidence common it is or even whether it exists. Our exis- suggesting that life may be common in the Uni- tence on Earth can tell us little about how com- verse includes: mon life is in the Universe or about the proba- bility of biogenesis on a terrestrial planet because, Sun-like stars are common.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternate Constellation Guide
    ARKANSAS NATURAL SKY ASSOCIATION LEARNING THE CONSTELLATIONS (Library Telescope Manual included) By Robert Togni Cover Image courtesy of Wikimedia. Do not write in this book, and return with scope to library. A personal copy of this guide can be obtained online at www.darkskyarkansas.com Preface This publication was inspired by and built upon Robert (Rocky) Togni’s quest to share the night sky with all who can be enticed under it. His belief is that the best place to start a relationship with the night sky is to learn the constellations and explore the principle ob- jects within them with the naked eye and a pair of common binoculars. Over a period of years, Rocky evolved a concept, using seasonal asterisms like the Summer Triangle and the Winter Hexagon, to create an easy to use set of simple charts to make learning one’s way around the night sky as simple and fun as possible. Recognizing that the most avid defenders of the natural night time environment are those who have grown to know and love nature at night and exploring the universe that it re- veals, the Arkansas Natural Sky Association (ANSA) asked Rocky if the Association could publish his guide. The hope being that making this available in printed form at vari- ous star parties and other relevant venues would help bring more people to the night sky as well as provide funds for the Association’s work. Once hooked, the owner will definitely want to seek deeper guides. But there is no better publication for opening the sky for the neophyte observer, making the guide the perfect companion for a library telescope.
    [Show full text]
  • The Age of the Universe: One Reality Viewed from Two Different Perspectives by Gerald Schroeder #Can the Universe Be Young and Old Simultaneously?
    The Age of the Universe: One Reality Viewed from Two Different Perspectives By Gerald Schroeder #Can the universe be young and old simultaneously? For centuries, science and theology have been locked in an ideological battle as to the ultimate source of truth. And basic to this standoff is the question of the age of our universe. Is it an old universe with a history containing fossils of dinosaurs and cavemen, or young with just a few days passing between the creation of the universe and the creation of Adam, the first human being? And if our universe is young, then the so-called ancient fossils were placed in the ground by God to test our faith in the truth of the Bible. The old age measure of our universe is based on research by astronomers and cosmologists. These scientists measure how much light waves from distant galaxies are stretched and lengthened due to the stretching of the space of the universe as those light waves travelled over eons of time to reach us here on earth. The data embedded in those stretched rays of light reveal that our magnificent universe was created at just under 14 billion years ago. The young age measure of our universe is based on data in the Bible. The opening chapter of Genesis states that six days passed between the creation of the universe and the creation of Adam. Then in Genesis, Chapter 4 we read that Adam and Eve had two sons, Cain and Abel. Cain murdered Abel and Cain was exiled by God.
    [Show full text]
  • New Model of Abiogenesis
    Goldschmidt2020 Abstract New model of abiogenesis A. IVANOV1, V. SEVASTYANOV1, A. DOLGONOSOV1 AND E. GALIMOV1 1Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry of Russian Academу of Sciences, Kosygina street 19, Moscow 119334, Russia ([email protected]) Understanding the nature of the causes that led to the beginning of the structural self-organization of protobionts is a fundamental question in finding solutions to the problem of abiogenic origin of life. The main difficulties in understanding the question - how this happened, arise due to the fact that after 4 billion years of geological and biological activity of the planet, direct material evidence, the complex process of spontaneous generation of living matter, was not found. But is it possible, with a detailed examination of the geophysical and geochemical features of the situation of the early Earth, to restore the history of the sequence of prebiological events that predetermined the formation of protocellular precursors of the first living organisms? After all, in fact, having embarked on this path, you can trace the order of formation of prebiotic structures reveal the principle of self-organization of primary biological matter, and eventually come to a pristine type of living matter. Probably, the primary living matter required not only special conditions, but also special location that could protect and maintain its existence for a long time, since the aggressive environment of the primitive Earth would not allow primitive life to develop without such protection. This is due to the various kinds of exposure to hard cosmic radiation, as well as the adverse effects of other physical and chemical factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleontology and the History of Life
    36954_u01.qxd 7/11/08 2:01 PM Page 80 Paleontology and the History of Life Michael Benton And out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof. Genesis 2:19 People have always been astounded by the diversity of life, although perhaps in different ways. In prescientific times farmers saw how their crops and live- stock were merely part of a much larger richness of life, and people have al- ways striven to understand the complexity and arrangement of living things. From Aristotle to Linnaeus, scientists attempted to catalog life and to under- stand where it had come from. During the eighteenth century it became clear to all savants that the earth had been populated formerly by strange and mar- velous creatures that had since become extinct. By 1820 some rough picture of the succession of floras and faunas through geological time was beginning to emerge. Charles Darwin, during the voyage of HMS Beagle in the early 1830s, became increasingly convinced that life was more diverse than he had imagined—every island he visited sported a new crop of plants and animals. He saw the lateral (geographic) and vertical (historic) links between species and realized by 1837 that species were all linked by a great tree. The tree con- cept made it clear why species that in his time were geographically close should also be genealogically close.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of the Universe (1 Year Calculator) Time on Timeline Time
    Timeline of the Universe (1 Year Calculator) Time on Timeline Time in Reality Event 1 January 15 billion years ago Beginning of universe Early Jan-Mid March 12-14.7 billion years ago Birth of solar system Early September 5 billion years ago Birth of Sun and planets 25 December 225 million years ago Mammals appear on Earth 29 December 65 million years ago Extinction of dinosaurs, more mammals appear 30 December 5 million years ago First Ancestors of man appear 31 December 11:53:00 pm (23:53:00) 195,000 years ago Homo Sapiens appears 31 December 11:59:52 pm (23:59:52) 4300 years ago Building of Stonehenge 31 December 11:59:59 pm (23:59:59) Around 400 years ago Invention of the Telescope https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cosmic_Calendar.png Event Number of Years Ago Number of Days Ago on Date/Time on Calendar Calculator The Big Bang 13.7 billion 365 days Jan 1, 12am Formation of stars & galaxies 13 billion (roughly) 365 days plus 15 min Jan 1, 12:15am Formation of the thin disk of 9 billion (roughly) 240 days May 6 the Milky Way Galaxy Formation of the Solar System 4.56 billion 122 days Sept. 1 Formation of the Moon 4.5 billion (roughly) 120 days Sept. 3 Birth of life on Earth 3.8 billion (roughly) 101 days Sept. 22 First cells develop on Earth 2 billion (roughly) 53 days Nov. 9 First Vertebrates 520 million (roughly) 14 days Dec. 18 First Dinosaurs 230 million 6 days Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Observing Notes
    Wynyard Planetarium & Observatory Spring Observing Notes Wynyard Planetarium & Observatory PUBLIC OBSERVING – Spring Tour of the Sky with the Naked Eye 2 1 Pointers Merak The Plough 4 Dubhe 5 Mizar Is Kochab Ursa Minor orange Kochab compared 3 to Polaris? Perseus Mirfak Polaris Pherkad 9 6 Algol Cassiopeia Look for the W shape delta 8 gamma 7 Notice how the constellations swing around Polaris during the night c Rob Peeling Feb-08 Figure 1: Sketch of the northern sky in spring North 1. On leaving the planetarium, turn around and look northwards over the roof of the building. Now look nearly straight above yourself and somewhat to your right and find a group of stars like the outline of a upside-down with its handle stretching to the right. This is the Plough (also called the Big Dipper) and is part of the constellation Ursa Major, the Great Bear. The top two stars are called the Pointers. 2. Use the Pointers to guide you downwards, to the next bright star. This is Polaris, the Pole (or North) Star. Note that it is not the brightest star in the sky, a common misconception. 3. Polaris, Kochab and Pherkad mark the constellation Ursa Minor, the Little Bear. To the right of Polaris are two prominent but fainter stars. These are Kochab and Pherkad, the Guardians of the Pole. Look carefully and you will notice that Kochab is slightly orange when compared to Polaris. Check with binoculars. Not all stars are white. The colour © Rob Peeling, CaDAS, 2008 Wynyard Planetarium & Observatory PUBLIC OBSERVING – Spring shows that Kochab is cooler than Polaris in the same way that red-hot is cooler than white-hot.
    [Show full text]
  • Big History Teaching Guide
    TEACHER MATERIALS BIG HISTORY TEACHING GUIDE Table of Contents Welcome to the Big History Project! 4 Join the Community 5 Who Should Teach Big History? 6 Course Themes 7 Essential Skills 7 Core Concepts 7 Course Structure 9 Part 1: Formations and Early Life 9 Part 2: Humans 10 Course Content 12 Lesson resources 13 Activities 13 Investigations 13 Project-based Learning Activities 13 Guiding Documents 13 Additional Resources 14 BIG HISTORY PROJECT / TEACHING GUIDE 1 TEACHER MATERIALS Extended Big History Offerings 15 Big History Public Course 15 Big History Project on Facebook and Twitter 15 Big History on Khan Academy 15 Big History on H2 15 Crash Course Big History 15 Teaching Big History 16 Teacher as Lead Learner 16 Big History Reading Guide 17 Approach to Reading 18 How to Meet These Goals 20 Big History Writing Guide 23 Part I: Prewriting 23 Part II: Outlining and Drafting 23 Part III: Revising and Finalizing 24 Assessment in Big History 25 Rubrics 25 Closings 25 Writing Assessments 25 Lesson Quizzes 26 Driving Question Notebook Guide 27 Who sees the DQ Book? 27 Little Big History 28 Project Based Learning 29 Openings Guide 30 BIG HISTORY PROJECT / TEACHING GUIDE 2 TEACHER MATERIALS Vocab Activities Guide 31 Menu of Activities 31 Memorization Activities 31 Comprehension Activities 33 Application Activities 34 Interpreting Infographics Guide 36 Homework Guide 37 Video 37 Readings 37 Sample Lesson - Origin Stories 39 BIG HISTORY PROJECT / TEACHING GUIDE 3 TEACHER MATERIALS Welcome to the Big History Project! Big History weaves evidence and insights from many disciplines across 13.8 billion years into a single, cohesive, science-based origin story.
    [Show full text]