Myanmar: Conflicts and Human Rights Violations Continue to Cause Displacement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Myanmar: Conflicts and Human Rights Violations Continue to Cause Displacement 5 March 2009 Myanmar: Conflicts and human rights violations continue to cause displacement Displacement as a result of conflict and human rights violations continued in Myanmar in 2008. An estimated 66,000 people from ethnic minority communities in eastern Myanmar were forced to become displaced in order to avoid the effects of armed conflict and human rights abuses. As of October 2008, there were at least 451,000 people reported to be inter- nally displaced in the rural areas of eastern Myanmar. This is however a conservative fig- ure, and there is no information available on figures for internally displaced people (IDPs) in several parts of the country. In 2008, the displacement crisis continued to be most acute in Kayin (Karen) State in the east of the country where an intense offensive by the Myanmar army against ethnic insur- gent groups had been ongoing since late 2005. As of October 2008, there were reportedly over 100,000 IDPs in the state. New displacement was also reported in 2008 in western Myanmar’s Chin State as a result of human rights violations and severe food insecurity. People also continued to be displaced in some parts of the country due to a combination of coercive measures such as forced la- bour and land confiscation that left them with no choice but to migrate, often in the context of state-sponsored development initiatives. IDPs living in the areas of Myanmar still affected by armed conflict between the army and insurgent groups remained the most vulnerable, with their priority needs tending to be re- lated to physical security, food, shelter, health and education. Humanitarian access to this population continued to be very restricted. An unprecedented level of access for humanitarian workers was permitted in response to Cyclone Nargis which struck the Ayeyarwady (Irrawaddy) Delta in May 2008, but govern- ment restrictions on humanitarian access continued elsewhere in Myanmar and frustrated efforts to reach conflict-affected IDPs. Additionally, the awareness of the international community of the nature and extent of conflict-displacement in Myanmar continued to be limited. www.internal-displacement.org Map of Myanmar Source: United Nations Cartographic Section More maps are available on http://www.internal-displacement.org/ 2 Myanmar: Conflicts and human rights violations continue to cause displacement 5 March 2009 Background Party of Burma collapsed, allowing the army to concentrate its forces on ethnic Intense international attention focused on insurgencies which by this time were Myanmar in May 2008 due to the hu- mostly confined to the northern and east- manitarian crisis created by Cyclone ern border areas (University of Oxford Nargis that struck the Ayeyarwady (Ir- RSC, February 2007, p.3). rawaddy) Delta region. The cyclone se- verely affected 2.4 million people and led Between 1989 and 1995, ceasefires were to the initial displacement of 800,000 agreed between the government and a people. After it became clear that the majority of the armed ethnic groups. Cur- military government, currently known as rently only two significant insurgent or- the State Peace and Development Council ganisations remain in armed conflict with (SPDC), was not immediately opening up the SPDC. However, the number of peo- international access to affected areas, in- ple displaced because of these or earlier ternational pressure increased and after a conflicts for whom no durable solution series of diplomatic initiatives, a meeting has been found must be calculated in the between UN Secretary-General Ban Ki- millions, and includes vulnerable com- moon and Senior General Than Shwe led munities that have been living in dis- to a commitment to allow access to af- placement for decades (University of fected areas. The international assistance Oxford RSC, February 2007, pp.3-6). was to be facilitated through a coordina- The most acutely vulnerable internally tion mechanism led by the Association of displaced people (IDPs) live in those ar- South-East Asian Nations or ASEAN eas of the country still affected by sig- (Belanger and Horsey, ODI-HPN, De- nificant levels of armed conflict cember 2008, pp.3-4). Aid agencies have (University of Oxford RSC, February subsequently delivered assistance thanks 2007, p.4). to an unprecedented level of access and mobility in the Delta, and international There continues to be limited awareness organisations have reported access to any among the international community about requested part, including ethnic minority the scale of this conflict and related dis- areas, and the ability to send international placement crisis, even as at least half a staff to train, implement and monitor million people are estimated to be cur- programmes without obstruction (RI, 5 rently living as IDPs in eastern Myanmar. September 2008). Despite concessions made in the Ayeyarwady Delta after Cyclone Nargis, The situation, however, remains very dif- restrictions on humanitarian access have ferent for those internally displaced as a continued elsewhere in Myanmar and result of conflict between government frustrated efforts to reach conflict- forces and ethnic insurgent groups in affected IDPs (TBBC, FMR, December Myanmar, and by associated human rights 2008, p.14). violations. Since independence from Brit- ain in 1948, Myanmar has been subject to Causes of displacement armed conflicts, in the form of a commu- nist insurgency and a series of inter-linked The scale of internal displacement in ethnic rebellions. In 1989, the Communist Myanmar remains difficult to accurately 3 Myanmar: Conflicts and human rights violations continue to cause displacement 5 March 2009 assess due to the political sensitivities of cuts” counter-insurgency strategy which the government and impossible to assess aims to prevent the armed opposition in areas under the government’s control groups’ access to supplies, information, (TBBC, October 2008, p.8). The impact recruits and food (ANU, June 2007). of the conflicts, and government policies including counter-insurgency strategies, According to Amnesty International, on the enjoyment of human rights of ci- since at least the early 1980s, civilians in vilians and IDPs in particular have been areas of ongoing conflict in Myanmar documented in areas of eastern Myanmar. have been relocated to fenced settlements known as relocation sites. Villagers are According to Refugees International in characteristically given short notice peri- May 2007, the SPDC has been the ods prior to relocation, and villages may biggest perpetrator of human rights be burned down and mined in order to violations in the country, while to a lesser prevent return. Members of the army have extent abuses have been carried out by in many reported cases shot and killed ethnic insurgent groups. These groups people found in their villages after the have positioned themselves as the expiry of the notice period. Villagers have defenders of minority populations against reported being told that they would be the aggression of state forces. However killed if they fail to comply with reloca- they have been unable to defend civilians tion orders, and that anyone who re- against government action in retaliation mained would be taken to be supporters to their guerilla tactics. Since the 1960s, of armed oppositions groups and therefore in response to protracted insurgencies in treated as a legitimate military target dur- most ethnic minority areas, the army or ing counter-insurgency operations or Tatmadaw has often pursued brutal combat (AI, June 2008, p.26). counter-insurgency strategies, including the forced relocation of civilian In order to avoid going to relocation sites, populations (ANU, June 2007). some villagers have fled into the jungle, sometimes to hiding places prepared in The Karen National Union (KNU) and advance. They flee with only what they other insurgent groups have an interest in can carry, such as infant children, uten- controlling, or at least maintaining, sils, blankets, plastic sheeting, and a few civilian populations in traditional ethnic days’ supply of rice. Once the offensive lands, as a source of legitimacy, and of is over and troops have returned to their food, intelligence, soldiers and porters. camps, some villagers have tried to return On this basis they bear some to or near their fields and villages, while responsibility for the plight of civilians in others have remained displaced in hiding areas where they operate. For nearly 60 for longer periods (Eubank, FMR, April years, they have fought an armed conflict 2008, p.11). against the central government although the possibility of any military victory Besides direct relocation or eviction or- ended several years ago. Nevertheless ders issued by the military and civil au- most forms of displacement and thorities, internal displacement in associated human rights abuses still occur Myanmar results from a combination of in the context of the Tatmadaw’s “four coercive measures, such as forced labour, 4 Myanmar: Conflicts and human rights violations continue to cause displacement 5 March 2009 extortion and land confiscation, which drive down incomes to the point that According to TBBC, while the total num- people have no choice but to leave their ber of IDPs in eastern Myanmar’s Kayin homes (UN Special Rapporteur on the State, Kayah (Karenni) State, Shan State, situation of human rights in Myanmar, 7 Mon State, Tanintharyi (Tenasserim) Di- March 2008, p.17). Displacement has vision and Bago Division was likely to be also occurred in the context of state-
Recommended publications
  • Hakha Chin Land and Resource Tenure Resource and Land Chin Hakha in Change and Persistence
    PERSISTENCE AND CHANGE IN HAKHA CHIN LAND AND RESOURCETENURE PERSISTENCE AND CHANGE IN HAKHA CHIN LAND AND RESOURCE TENURE A STUDY ON LAND DYNAMICS IN THE PERIPHERY OF HAKHA M. Boutry, C. Allaverdian, Tin Myo Win, Khin Pyae Sone Of and Lives Land series Myanmar research Of Lives and Land Myanmar research series PERSISTENCE AND CHANGE IN HAKHA CHIN LAND AND RESOURCE TENURE A STUDY ON LAND DYNAMICS IN THE PERIPHERY OF HAKHA M. Boutry, C. Allaverdian, Tin Myo Win, Khin Pyae Sone Of Lives and Land Myanmar research series DISCLAIMER Persistence and change in Hakha Chin land and resource tenure: a study on land This document is supported with financial assistance from Australia, Denmark, dynamics in the periphery of Hakha. the European Union, France, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, and Published by GRET, 2018 the Mitsubishi Corporation. The views expressed herein are not to be taken to reflect the official opinion of any of the LIFT donors. Suggestion for citation: Boutry, M., Allaverdian, C. Tin Myo Win, Khin Pyae Sone. (2018). Persistence and change in Hakha Chin land and resource tenure: a study on land dynamics in the periphery of Hakha. Of lives of land Myanmar research series. GRET: Yangon. Written by: Maxime Boutry and Celine Allaverdian With the contributions of: Tin Myo Win, Khin Pyae Sone and Sung Chin Par Reviewed by: Paul Dewit, Olivier Evrard, Philip Hirsch and Mark Vicol Layout by: studio Turenne Of Lives and Land Myanmar research series The Of Lives and Land series emanates from in-depth socio-anthropological research on land and livelihood dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar: the Country That ‘Has It All’
    Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, Vol. 4 Issue. 1 June 2020 pp. 128 – 139 doi: 10.19184/jseahr.v4i1.17922 © University of Jember & Indonesian Consortium for Human Rights Lecturers Myanmar: the country that ‘has it all’ Susan Banki Department of Sociology and Social Policy - the University of Sydney Email: [email protected] Abstract For scholars of Southeast Asia interested in human rights, Myanmar is a country that ‘has it all.’ I use this tongue-in-cheek expression to suggest the myriad ways that the country remains mired in structural challenges that inform its current human rights problems. In this paper, I point out the country’s most glaring structural challenges and link these to its most pressing human rights problems. A brief section about Myanmar in the context of COVID-19 offers the same conclusion as the rest of the article: while there is variance in the actors targeted and the degree of suppression, the underlying patterns of oppression remain unchanged over time. Acknowledgements: The author would like to thank Nyi Nyi Kyaw for reviewing a draft of this paper and offering helpful comments. I. INTRODUCTION From its independence to the present day, one can look to Myanmar to observe multiple human rights trajectories, which today play out in myriad violations and responses in nearly all regions of the country. With natural resources of jade and teak, a rich cultural heritage with associated physical sites, and a central, if sandwiched, geopolitical location, one might imagine that the moniker I have given the country, ‘The country that has it all’ is a positive one.
    [Show full text]
  • Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State
    A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State ASIA PAPER May 2018 EUROPEAN UNION A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State © Institute for Security and Development Policy V. Finnbodavägen 2, Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.isdp.eu “A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State” is an Asia Paper published by the published by the Institute for Security and Development Policy. The Asia Paper Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Institute’s Asia Program, and addresses topical and timely subjects. The Institute is based in Stockholm, Sweden, and cooperates closely with research centers worldwide. The Institute serves a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. It is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion. This publication has been produced with funding by the European Union. The content of this publication does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed in the paper lies entirely with the authors. No third-party textual or artistic material is included in the publication without the copyright holder’s prior consent to further dissemination by other third parties. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. © European Union and ISDP, 2018 Printed in Lithuania ISBN: 978-91-88551-11-5 Cover photo: Patrick Brown patrickbrownphoto.com Distributed in Europe by: Institute for Security and Development Policy Västra Finnbodavägen 2, 131 30 Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Arakan Army, AA)
    Division de l’information, de la documentation et des recherches – DIDR 9 avril 2021 Myanmar / Birmanie : L’Armée de l’Arakan (Arakan Army, AA) Avertissement Ce document, rédigé conformément aux lignes directrices communes à l’Union européenne pour le traitement de l’information sur le pays d’origine, a été élaboré par la DIDR en vue de fournir des informations utiles à l’examen des demandes de protection internationale. Il ne prétend pas faire le traitement exhaustif de la problématique, ni apporter de preuves concluantes quant au fondement d’une demande de protection internationale particulière et ne doit pas être considéré comme une position officielle de l’Ofpra. La reproduction ou diffusion du document n’est pas autorisée, à l’exception d’un usage personnel, sauf accord de l’Ofpra en vertu de l’article L. 335-3 du code de la propriété intellectuelle. Myanmar / Birmanie : L’Arakan Army, (AA) Table des matières 1. Principales caractéristiques de l’Arakan Army ................................................................................ 3 1.1. Une organisation liée à la KIA et à l’UWSA ............................................................................. 3 1.2. Relations avec les autres organisations politico-militaires ...................................................... 3 2. Les opérations armées de l’AA ont entraîné des représailles massives ......................................... 4 3. Les interventions de l’AA à des fins logistiques dans les villages ................................................... 5 4. Enlèvements
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar Situation Update (10 to 16 May 2021)
    Myanmar Situation Update (10 to 16 May 2021) Summary: One hundred days after the coup, the junta has pushed the region’s fastest-growing economy into an economic and humanitarian disaster. The World Bank forecast shows that Myanmar's economy is expected to contract by 10% in 2021, a sharp difference from the previous prediction of 5.9% growth in October 2020. There is a possible banking crisis which leads to cash shortages, limited access to social welfare payments and international remittances. Last week, Myanmar Kyat hit one of its lowest compared to the USD. The World Food Program also estimates that up to 3.4 million more people, particularly those in urban areas, will face hunger during the next six months. Price rises, hurting the poor and causing shortages of some essentials, including the costs of fuel and medicine. The junta called to reopen colleges, universities and schools soon but many students and educators are boycotting. As a result, around 13,000 staff had been suspended by May 8. The junta also announced job vacancies for educational positions to replace striking staff. Across Myanmar, the ordinary citizens have taken up any weapons available from air guns to traditional firearms and homemade bombs and arms have spread in Chin state, Sagaing, Magwe and Mandalay regions. Mindat township in Chin State reported more intensified fights between the civil resistance groups and the Myanmar military while clashes were reported in Myingyan township, Mandalay region and Tamu township, Sagaing region. According to our information, at least 43 bomb blasts happened across Myanmar in the past week and many of them were in Yangon’s townships.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Chin State Rapid Assessment Report Sept
    First Rapid Assessment in Southern Chin State (30 th August 2010 to 9 th September 2010) Final Report Table of contents 1 Assessment rationale, objectives and methodology .................................................3 1.1 Context: worrying trends in Southern Chin State..............................................3 1.2 Objectives of the rapid assessment .................................................................4 1.3 Assessment methodology and constraints .......................................................4 2 Background information on the two townships: difficult access, few INGOs .............4 2.1 Mindat Township..............................................................................................4 2.2 Kanpetlet Township .........................................................................................5 3 Overview of local farming systems ...........................................................................6 3.1 Main crops and cropping systems....................................................................6 3.1.1 Slash-and-burn system ................................................................................6 3.1.2 Home gardens .............................................................................................7 3.1.3 Winter crops.................................................................................................7 3.1.4 Permanent crops..........................................................................................7 3.2 Farming calendar.............................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • ACLED – Myanmar Conflict Update – Table 1
    Actor Name Ideology Status Areas of Operation Affiliations Modus Operandi & Adversaries - Armed wing of ULA: United - Chin State League of Arakan - Battles and Remote violence against Active - Kachin State - Member of FPNCC Myanmar Security Forces Arakan Ethnic combatant; not - Rakhine State (Northern Alliance) - Battles against Bangladeshi Security AA: Arakan Army Nationalism party to 2015 - Shan State - NCCT, , , Forces ceasefire - Myanmar-Bangladesh - Allied with KIA - Battles against ALA Border - Formerly allied with ABSDF (pre-ceasefire) - Myanmar-Thailand ABSDF: All Burma Liberal Party to 2015 Border - Battled against Myanmar Security - Allied with KIA, AA, KNLA Students’ Democratic Front democracy ceasefire - Myanmar-India Border Forces - Myanmar-China Border Active AA: Arakan Army (Kayin): Arakan Ethnic combatant; not - Member of NCCT, ANC - Kayin State - Battles against Myanmar Security Forces Arakan State Army Nationalism party to 2015 - Allied with DKBA-5 ceasefire - Armed wing of the ALP: ALA: Arakan Liberation Arakan Liberation Party - Battled against Myanmar Security Army Arakan Ethnic Party to 2015 - Rakhine State - Member of NCCT, ANC Forces Nationalism ceasefire - Kayin State - Allied with AA: Arakan (Also known as RSLP: Rakhine - Battled against AA State Liberation Party) Army (Kayin), KNLA, SSA-S WWW.ACLEDDATA.COM | Conflict Update – Myanmar – Table 1 Rohingya Ethnic Active ARSA: Arakan Rohingya - Rakhine State Nationalism; combatant; not Salvation Army - Myanmar-Bangladesh UNKNOWN - Battles against Myanmar Security
    [Show full text]
  • CHIN STATE, MINDAT DISTRICT Sami Sub-Township Report
    THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census CHIN STATE, MINDAT DISTRICT Sami Sub-Township Report Department of Population Ministry of Labour, Immigration and Population October 2017 The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census Chin State, Mindat District Sami Sub-Township Report Department of Population Ministry of Labour, Immigration and Population Office No.48 Nay Pyi Taw Tel: +95 67 431062 www.dop.gov.mm October 2017 Figure 1: Map of Chin State, showing the townships Sami Sub-Township Figures at a Glance 1 Total Population 32,082 2 Population males 15,666 (48.8%) Population females 16,416 (51.2%) Percentage of urban population 9.5% Area (Km2) 4,121.8 3 Population density (per Km2) 7.8 persons Median age 18.4 years Number of wards 3 Number of village tracts 39 Number of private households 6,223 Percentage of female headed households 16.3% Mean household size 5.0 persons 4 Percentage of population by age group Children (0 – 14 years) 43.2% Economically productive (15 – 64 years) 53.1% Elderly population (65+ years) 3.7% Dependency ratios Total dependency ratio 88.1 Child dependency ratio 81.2 Old dependency ratio 6.9 Ageing index 8.5 Sex ratio (males per 100 females) 95 Literacy rate (persons aged 15 and over) 67.1% Male 84.6% Female 52.2% People with disability Number Per cent Any form of disability 1,262 3.9 Walking 557 1.7 Seeing 573 1.8 Hearing 521 1.6 Remembering 509 1.6 Type of Identity Card (persons aged 10 and over) Number Per cent Citizenship Scrutiny 12,928 57.6 Associate Scrutiny *
    [Show full text]
  • No More Denial: Children Affected by Armed Conflict in Myanmar (Burma)
    No More Denial: Children Affected by Armed Conflict in Myanmar (Burma) May 2009 Watchlist Mission Statement The Watchlist on Children and Armed Conflict strives to end violations against children in armed conflicts and to guarantee their rights. As a global network, Watchlist builds partnerships among local, national and international nongovernmental organizations, enhancing mutual capacities and strengths. Working together, we strategically collect and disseminate information on violations against children in conflicts in order to influence key decision-makers to create and implement programs and policies that effectively protect children. Watchlist works within the framework of the provisions adopted in Security Council Resolutions 1261, 1314, 1379, 1460, 1539 and 1612, the principles of the Convention on the Rights of the Child and its protocols and other internationally adopted human rights and humanitarian standards. General supervision of Watchlist is provided by a Steering Committee of international nongovernmental organizations known for their work with children and human rights. The views presented in this report do not represent the views of any one organization in the network or the Steering Committee. For further information about Watchlist or specific reports, or to share information about children in a particular conflict situation, please contact: [email protected] www.watchlist.org Photo Credits Cover Photo: UNICEF/NYHQ2006- 1870/Robert Few Please Note: The people represented in the photos in this report are not necessarily themselves victims or survivors of human rights violations or other abuses. No More Denial: Children Affected by Armed Conflict in Myanmar (Burma) May 2009 Notes on Methodology . Information contained in this report is current through January 1, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding an Endgame in Kachin State the KIO’S Strategies for Finding a Resolution to the Conflict
    EBO Background Paper - No .3 | 2018 September 2018 AUTHOR | Paul Keenan Finding an Endgame in Kachin State The KIO’s strategies for finding a resolution to the conflict Since 9 June 2011, Kachin State has seen open (CEFU). The Committee’s purpose was to conflict between the Kachin Independence Army consolidate a political front at a time when the and the Tatmadaw (Myanmar military). The Kachin ceasefire groups faced perceived imminent attacks Independence Organisation had signed a ceasefire by the Tatmadaw. However, in November 2010 agreement with the regime in 1994 and since then shortly after the Myanmar elections, the political had lived in relative peace until the ceasefire was grouping was transformed into a military united broken by the Tatmadaw in June 2011. front. At a conference held from the 12-16 February 2011, CEFU declared its dissolution and the The increased territorial infractions by the formation of the United Nationalities Federal Tatmadaw combined with economic exploitation Council (UNFC). The UNFC, which was at that time by China in Kachin territory, especially the comprised of 12 ethnic organisations1, stated that: construction of the Myitsone Hydropower Dam, left the Kachin Independence Organisation with very The goal of the UNFC is to establish the little alternative but to return to armed resistance future Federal Union (of Myanmar) and to prevent further abuses of its people and their the Federal Union Army is formed for territory’s natural resources. Despite this, however, giving protection to the people of the the political situation since the beginning of country.2 hostilities has changed significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • CRC Shadow Report Burma the Plight of Children Under Military Rule in Burma
    CRC Shadow Report Burma The plight of children under military rule in Burma Child Rights Forum of Burma 29th April 2011 Assistance for All Political Prisoners-Burma (AAPP-B), Burma Issues ( BI), Back Pack Health Worker Team(BPHWT) and Emergency Action Team (EAT), Burma Anti-Child Trafficking (Burma-ACT), Burmese Migrant Workers Education Committee (BMWEC), Chin Human Rights Organization (CHRO), Committee For Protection and Promote of Child Rights-Burma (CPPCR-Burma), Foundation for Education and Development (FED)/Grassroots Human Rights Education (GHRE), Human Rights Education Institute of Burma (HREIB), Karen Human Rights Group (KHRG), Karen Youth Organization (KYO), Kachin Women’s Association Thailand (KWAT), Mae Tao Clinic (MTC), Oversea Mon Women’s Organization (OMWO), Social Action for Women (SAW),Women and Child Rights Project (WCRP) and Human Rights Foundation of Monland (HURFOM),Yoma 3 News Service (Burma) TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Acknowledgement 3 Introduction 3 Purpose and Methodology of the Report 4 Articles 24 and 27 ‐ the right to health and an adequate standard of living 6 Access to Health Services 7 Child Malnutrition 8 Maternal health 9 Denial of the right to health for children in prisons 10 Article 28 – Right to education 13 Inadequate teacher salaries 14 Armed conflict and education 15 Education for girls 16 Discrimination in education 16 Human Rights Education 17 Article 32–Child Labour 19 Forced Labour 20 Portering for the Tatmadaw 21 Article 34 and 35 ‐ Trafficking in Children 23 Corruption and restrictions
    [Show full text]
  • Country Paper (Myanmar Today)
    Myanmar Today I. Introduction Myanmar, officially known as the Republic of the Union of Myanmar is geographically situated in the south-east Asia region. As the largest country on mainland South-East Asia, it shares borders with China, Laos and Thailand in the east and Bangladesh, India in the west, the Bay of Bengal to the South-West with the Andaman Sea. The country covers an area of 261228 sq miles (677000 square kilometers), ranging 582 miles (936 kilometers) from east to west and 1275 miles (2051 kilometers) from north to south. Myanmar is made up of over one hundred national races, of which the main national races are Kachin, Kayah, Kayan, Chin, Burma, Mon, Rakhine and Shan. The Population of the country is over 60 million. Urban and Rural ratio in Myanmar is 30:70. II. Background Myanmar has emerged as a new nation in line with its Constitution which adopted on 29 May 2008, and so it is on the right track of transition into new era and new system. The process of building a modern and developed nation has posted milestones of success, and is also moving forward at an accelerating pace. As a developing country, Myanmar has been practicing market economy system to raise socio-economic status of its people. And in building a modern and industrialized nation in accord with the Constitution, Myanmar makes strenuous efforts for proper evolution of market economy through agricultural development in combination with all-round development of other sectors. At the same time Myanmar exercising independent, active and non-aligned foreign policy and upholding the principles of peaceful coexistence among nations, tries its best to catch up with not only regionalization but also globalization process.
    [Show full text]