sign in sign up
<<
Home , Branches of physics

arXiv:gr-qc/0506075 v2 17 Jun 2005 ∗ physic twentieth-century of developments regarded greatest usually two are the and relativity eral is eouinr da nmdr cec h data gravit that idea the a — beautiful most a modern the of in for one ideas quest revolutionary is the relativity gravi general in includes of that play heart The at fundamental int ideas the the of the theory is of unified It many itself. of universe origin the lectual of evolution gravitat the stars, of and con- destiny , final our the underlies pulsa sources, holes, X-ray It black quasars, bang, theor big forces. classical the fundamental the of understanding four is temporary It the old. of century one a of be soon will — ativity u oho otmoayrsac n fpplrscientific popular of fo- and the research are contemporary bang big of the both and cus stu holes, in black interest excites relativi , subject Warped general the First, to others: are undergraduates There introducing for reason to opportunity relativity. general an every to have introduced opinion, be should author’s major the In wit undergraduate connected observation. increasingly and and physics, of areas inte increas other increasingly is there with physics topical, But gravitational increasingly when argu- ago. important, era an ingly century an in been a today half have none organization might is an There such in for all, subject. ment prospectiv at the for if part in in next, specialists designed context and course the mechanics graduate in basic advanced an in first con- orbits the planetary see has of students This many that curriculum. sequence physics a undergraduate relativity the i general an of in offered course that (junior/senior) handful a termediate only mid-wester found 32 universities of offerings research course the in of b [1] survey anywhere Hiscock informal William represented An not curriculum. often physics undergraduate is i the simple — so conception and basic physics, of its branches several for important so lcrncades [email protected] address: Electronic h emtyo uvdfu-iesoa pctm.Gen- spacetime. four-dimensional curved of the isens11 eaiitcter fgaiy—gnrlre general — gravity of theory relativistic 1915 Einstein’s e,prdxcly eea eaiiy—s elestablish well so — relativity general paradoxically, Yet, t motnei otmoaypyisi o h only the not is physics contemporary in importance Its ASnmes 01.40.-d,04.20.-q,95.30.Sf numbers: PACS majors. ae ae h aefra‘hsc rt praht introdu to approach first’ ‘physics a for case t and the ) makes and paper ( scales distance largest isensgnrlrltvt sicesnl motn i important increasingly is relativity general Einstein’s .INTRODUCTION I. nvriyo aiona at abr,C 93106-9530 CA Barbara, Santa California, of University negaut hsc Curriculum Physics Undergraduate eea eaiiyi the in Relativity General Dtd oebr1,2005) 11, November (Dated: eateto Physics of Department ae .Hartle B. James grated dents. part s ional s. ed, el- nd rs, ty. ty. as n- l- h y n y y n e - otmoaypyiso h rnir fbt h very the both of frontiers the on physics contemporary n ursamnmmo nw ahmtclies ae h Ein- most the subject Later ideas. the mathematical that of ‘new’ of part part minimum the a the and quires is mechanics classical It to light connected possible. pheno directly and as physical particles interesting quickly to test as student of ena the brings the This of rays. be study can a consequences by observable explored and properties whose etok.Rf.[][2 r ata ito et known texts of of list lack a partial not author a is the are it to [2]—[22] Certainly Refs. m role. and a textbooks. play tradition, all , may resources, conceptions curriculum limited physics undergraduate , the Limited of part as not widely is relativity more general as important and accessible, sic, undergrad the at a alike level. faculty made and be students both can to cessible relativity General mo much require information. interactions prerequisite strong superconductivit the contempo- of theories great high gauge of or as subjects such Other importance ad- rary kit. usual the tool beyond calculus me- mathematics vanced in of background minimum basic a and a chanics just paper, with can this introduced physics in efficiently gravitational show be of to phenomena hope important I of number As general undergraduate accessibility. for argument is w further relativity naturally A physics more. know in to specializing Students fascination. nrdcoylevel. introductory ipetpyial eeatsltost h isenequ Einstein the Briefly, introduced to are solutions tion level. relevant junior/senior physically the simplest at arti intro to This relativity approach general faculty. first’ ing ‘physics or different, students a either whi describes to relativity cle available general be for develop not to may ‘mat time This takes order experiment. first’ and observation with assemble comp predictions and to circumstances, the interesting is in others) equations the equati most solve field the for motivate tools, (as mathematical necessary subject the appro this deductive teaching The to level. undergraduate the at relativity 1 evr mleteeetr atcepyis.This physics). particle smallest(elementary very he ugdt eitoutr.I osntpeedt eete co either be read are to texts pretend the that not representation does a af it It published is author, nor selective, introductory. the be to known to texts judged of consists list This ti rbbyfutest pclt nwyasbeta ba- as subject a why on speculate to fruitless probably is It vial iei n fteosalst nrdcn genera introducing to obstacles the of one is time Available iggnrlrltvt oudrrdaephysics undergraduate to relativity general cing ∗ 1 httetgnrlrltvt nsm a tan at way some in relativity general treat that first ihu eiain scre - curved as derivation, without , l available. ily e 95 and 1975, ter peeor mplete taught duc- ons, uate ach ant the are re- m- is- ch c- re a- h y a - l . 2 stein equation can be motivated and solved to show where the solutions come from. When time is limited this is a surer and more direct route to getting at the applications of general rel- ativity that are important in contemporary science. Section II expands very briefly on the importance of gen- eral relativity in contemporary physics. Section III outlines the basic structure of the subject. Sections IV and V describe the ‘math first’ and ‘physics first’ approaches to introducing to undergraduate physics majors. This is not an even-handed comparison. The ‘math first’ approach is de- scribed only to contrast it with the ‘physics first’ approach which is advocated in this paper. Section VI illustrates how ideas from can be used to calculate im- portant effects in general relativity. Section VII reports the personal experiences of the author in using the ‘physics first’ method.

II. WHERE IS GENERAL RELATIVITY IMPORTANT?

Gravity is the weakest of the four fundamental forces at accessible scales. The ratio of the gravitational to the electric force between two protons separated by a distance r is (in Gaussian electromagnetic units)

Gm2 /r2 Gm2 Fgrav p p ∼ −40 = 2 2 = 2 10 . (2.1) Felec e /r e

Gravity might thus seem to be negligible. But three other facts FIG. 1: Where relativistic gravity is important. This figure shows explain why it is important and where it is important. First, selected phenomena plotted on a graph of their characteristic gravity is a universal force coupling to all forms of mass and M vs. their characteristic size R. The distance scale ranges from energy. Second, gravity is a long-range force in contrast to the the smallest considered in today’s physics (the Planck scale) to the weak and strong forces which are characterized by nucleus- largest (the size of the visible universe). range from those of size ranges and below. Third, and most importantly, gravity is elementary particles to the mass in the visible universe. Phenomena 2 unscreened. There is no negative “gravitational charge”; mass above the line 2GM = c R are inside black holes and inaccessible. is always positive. Phenomena on that line, or close to it and below, are the ones for which general relativity is important [cf. (2.2)] and are indicated by These three facts explain why gravity is the dominant force dots. Phenomena further away, for which relativity is unimportant, governing the structure of the universe on the largest scales of are indicated by squares. For the universe R is the Hubble distance space and time — the scales of astrophysics and cosmology. and M the mass inside it. Our universe roughly evolves along the line The strong and weak forces are short range. The relatively 2GM = c2R from the smallest scales of to the largest much greater strength of electromagnetic forces ensures that characterizing present cosmology. (Reproduced from [11] which was charges will be screened in an electrically neutral universe like adapted from a figure prepared by C. Will for [25]). ours. Only gravity is left to operate on very large scales. Relativistic gravity — general relativity — is important for an object of mass M and size R when general relativistic effects are important for the operation of the Global Positioning System (GPS) [24]. GM Relativistic gravity is also important on the smallest scales q ≡ ∼ 1. (2.2) Rc2 considered in contemporary physics — those of quantum gravity. These are characterized by the Planck ℓ Neutron stars (q ∼ .1) and black holes (q ∼ .5) are relativistic objects by this rough criterion. So is our universe (q ∼ 1) if 3 1 −33 ℓPl = (Gh¯/c ) 2 ∼ 10 cm. (2.3) we take R to be the present Hubble distance and M to be the mass within it. Figure 1 displays some phenomena for which This is much, much smaller than even the scale of the strong relativity is important and ones for which it is not. interactions ∼ 10−13 cm. Yet, this is the scale which many General relativity can sometimes be important even when contemporary explorers believe will naturally characterize the q is small provided compensating observational precision can final theory unifying the four fundamental forces including be achieved. For the Sun q ∼ 10−6, yet the solar system is the gravity. This is the characteristic scale of . This domain of the precision tests that confirm general relativity to is the scale that will characterizethe union of the two great de- as much as 1 part in 105 [23]. For the Earth q ∼ 10−9, yet velopments of twentieth century physics — general relativity 3 and . straight path in the curved spacetime produced by the The important point for this discussion is that the last few Sun. decades have seen dramatic growth in observational data on the frontier of the very large, and an equally dramatic growth Making these ideas more precise and more explicit is an ob- in theoretical confidence in exploring the frontier of the very jective of any course in general relativity. We mention a few small. Black holes, for example, are no longer a theorist’s steps toward this objective here. dream. They have been identified at the center of galaxies (in- Points in four-dimensionalspacetime can be located by four cluding our own) and in X-ray binaries. They are central to coordinates xα,α = 0,1,2,3. Coordinates are arbitrary pro- the explanations of the most energetic phenomena in the uni- vided they label points uniquely. Generally, several different verse such as active galactic nuclei. On even larger scales, coordinate patches are required to label all the points in space- it is now a commonplace observation that cosmology has be- time. come a data driven science. Cosmological parameters once The geometry of a spacetime is specified by giving the met- uncertain by orders of magnitude have been determined to ac- ric, gαβ(x), where the (x) indicates that the metric is gener- curacies of 10% [26, 27]. ally a function of all four coordinates. The metric determines Adventures into Planck scale physics may be mostly in the the squared distance ds2 in four-dimensional spacetime be- minds of theorists, but the quest for a unified theory of the tween points separated by infinitesimal coordinate intervals fundamental forces including gravity is being pursued with dxα. Specifically, impressive vigor and confidence by a large community. In- deed, at the big bangwhere largeand small are one, we should 2 α β ds = gαβ(x)dx dx (3.1) eventually see direct evidence of Planck scale physics. For these reasons general relativity is increasingly central where a double sum over α and β from 0 to 3 is implied. Inte- to today’s physics. It is increasingly topical, increasingly con- gration of the ds specfied by this expression gives the distance nected with experiment and observation, and increasingly in- along curves. tegrated with other branches of physics2 Metrics satisfy the Einstein equation

1 8πG Rαβ − gαβ R = Tαβ (3.2) III. KEY IDEAS IN GENERAL RELATIVITY 2 c4

This section sketches a few key ideas in general relativity relating a measure of on the left hand side to the for those who may not be familiar with the theory. The intent energy-momentumtensor of matter on the right. This Einstein is not to offer an exposition of these ideas. That, after all, is equation comprises 10 non-linear, partial differential equa- properly the task of texts on the subject. Rather, the purpose tions for the metric gαβ(x). An important example of a so- is merely to mention ideas that will occur in the subsequent lution to the Einstein equation is the Schwarzschild geom- discussion and to illustrate the simplicity of the conceptual etry giving the metric in the empty space outside a spheri- structure of the subject. cally symmetric black hole or star. In standard Schwarzschild α It’s potentially misleading to summarize any subject in spherical coordinates x = (t,r,θ,φ) this is physics in terms of slogans. However, the following three − roughly stated ideas are central to general relativity. 2GM 2GM 1 ds2 = − 1 − (cdt)2 + 1 − dr2  c2r   c2r  • Gravity is Geometry. Phenomena familiarly seen as + r2 dθ2 + sin2 θdφ2 (3.3) arising from gravitational forces in a Newtonian context are more generally due to the curvature of geometry of  where M is the mass of the black hole or star. This, to an ex- four-dimensional spacetime. cellent approximation, describes the curved spacetime outside • Mass-Energy is the Source of Spacetime Curvature. our Sun. Mass is the source of spacetime curvature and, since Test particles with masses too small to affect the ambient general relativity incorporates , any geometry move on straight paths in it. More precisely, they form of energy is also a source of spacetime curvature. move between any two points, A and B, in spacetime on a (curve) of stationary τ. The proper • Free Mass Moves on Straight Paths in Curved Space- time along a world line is the distance along it measured in τ2 − 2 2 time. In general relativity, the Earth moves around the time units. Thus, d = ds /c . (The negative sign is so τ2 Sun in the orbit it does, not because of a gravitational d is positive along the world lines of particles which always force exerted by the Sun, but because it is following a move with less than the ). Curves of stationary proper time are called geodesics. The world line of a particle through spacetime from A to B can be described by giving its coordinates xα(λ) as a function 2 For more on the importance of general relativity in contemporary physics, of any parameter that takes fixed values on the end points. For see e.g. [25]. instance using the Schwarzschild metric (3.3), the principle of 4 stationary proper time takes the form: Differential geometry is a deep and beautiful mathematical subject. However, even an elementary introduction to its basic B B 1 2GM δ τ δ λ − ˙ 2 ideas and methodsare not a part of the typical advancedcalcu- d = d 2 1 2 (ct) ZA ZA c  c r  lus tool kit acquired by physics majors in their first few years. −1 1 This is ‘new math’. In contrast, the vector calculus central to 2GM 2 − 1 − r˙2 − r2 θ˙2 + sin2 θφ˙2 = 0 (3.4) is part of this tool kit.  c2r    It is possible at the undergraduate level to give an intro- duction to the basic mathematical ideas of manifolds, vectors, λ δ where a dot denotes a derivative with respect to and means dual vectors, tensors, metric, covariant derivative, and curva- the first variation as in classical mechanics. ture. Indeed, many students feel empowered by learning new The variational principle (3.4) for stationary proper time mathematics. But it does take time. It also must be prac- has the same form as the variational principle for stationary α α ticed. The author’s experience is that many students at this in classical mechanics. The Lagrangian L(x˙ ,x ) is level need considerable exercise before they are able to ac- the integrand of (3.4). Lagrange’s equations are the geodesic curately and efficiently manipulate tensorial expressions and equations of motion. Their form can be made especially sim- feel at home with the four-dimensionalmathematical concepts ple by choosing proper time τ for the parameter λ. From them necessary to formulate Einstein’s equation. When time is lim- one can deduce the conservationof energy, the conservation of ited, pursuing the deductive order may leave little available angular , and an effective equation for radial mo- for the interesting applications of general relativity. tion in the Schwarzschild geometryas we will describe in Sec- Further, solving the Einstein equation to exhibit physically tion VI [cf.(6.1)]. With that, one can calculate a spectrum of relevant spacetime is a difficult matter. Their non- phenomena ranging from the precession of planetary orbits to linear nature means that there is no known general solution the collapse to a black hole. outside of linearized gravity. Each new situation, e.g. spheri- When extended to light rays and implemented in appropri- cal symmetry, homogeneous and isotropic cosmological mod- ate metrics, the geodesic equations are enough to explore most els, gravitational plane waves, is typically a new problem in of the important applications of relativistic gravity displayed applied mathematics. Deriving the solutions only adds to in Table 1. the time expended before interesting applications can be dis- cussed. Many of the successful introductory texts in general relativ- IV. TEACHING GENERAL RELATIVITY — MATH FIRST ity follow this logical order at various levels of compromise. In the author’s opinion, an outstanding example is Bernard The deductive approach to teaching many subjects in Schutz’s classic A First Course in General Relativity [19]. In physics is to the next section we consider a different way of introducing general relativity to undergraduates. 1. Introduce the necessary mathematical tools;

2. Motivate and explain the basic field equations; V. TEACHING GENERAL RELATIVITY — PHYSICS FIRST 3. Solve the field equations in interesting circumstances; and are not usually presented in 4. Apply the solutions to make predictions and compare introductory (freshman) courses in the deductive order de- with observation and experiment. scribed in the previous section. Specifically, we do not usually first develop vector calculus, then exhibit Maxwell’s equa- For electromagnetism, (1)–(4) are, e.g. (1) Vector calcu- tions, then solve for the fields of charges, currents, and ra- lus, (2) Maxwell’s equations, (3) boundary value problems, diation, and finally apply these to realistic electromagnetic the fields of point particles, radiation fields, etc., (4) charged phenomena. Rather, the typical course posits the fields of the particle motion, circuits, guides and cavities, antennas, simplest physically relevant examples, for instance the electric dielectric and magnetic materials, magnetohydrodynamics — field of a point charge, the magnetic field of a straight wire, a list that could very easily be extended. For gravitation (1)– and the electromagnetic plane wave. These are used to build (4) are e.g. (1) differential geometry, (2) the Einstein equation understanding of fields and their interaction with charges for and the geodesic equation, (3) the solutions for spherical sym- immediate application to demonstrable electromagnetic phe- metry, cosmological models, gravitational waves, relativistic nomena. Maxwell’s ten partial differential equations and their stars, etc. Table 1 lists some of the applications of general associated gauge and Lorentz invariances are better appreci- relativity that constitute (4). ated later, usually in a more advanced course. This deductiveorderof presentationis logical; it is the order General relativity can be efficiently introduced at an inter- used by the great classic texts [28, 29, 30, 31]; and it is the or- mediate (junior/senior) level following the same ‘physics first’ der used in standard graduate courses introducing the subject model used in introducing electromagnetism. Specifically: at an advanced level. But the deductive order does have some drawbacks for an elementary introduction to physics majors 1. Exhibit the simplest physically important spacetime ge- in a limited time. ometries first, without derivation; 5

Table 1 Some Important Applications of General Relativity Global Positioning System (GPS) Lense-Thirring precession of a gyroscope Gravitational redshift Cosmological redshift Bending of light by the Sun Expansion of the universe Precession of Mercury’s perihelion Big-bang Shapiro time delay Cosmic Background Radiation Gravitational lensing The fate of the universe Accretion disks around compact objects Propagation of gravitational waves Determining parameters of binary pulsars Operation of gravitational wave detectors Spherical gravitational collapse X-ray sources Formation of black holes Active Galactic Nuclei Hawking radiation from black holes Neutron stars Frame-dragging by a rotating body

2. Derive the predictions of these geometries for observa- • The universe is approximately homogeneous and tion by a study of the orbits of test particles and light isotropic on scales above 100 megaparsecs. rays moving in them; • Detectable gravitational waves are weak. 3. Apply these predictions to realistic astrophysical situa- tions and compare with experiment and observation; These four facts mean that the simplest solutions of the Einstein equation are the ones most relevant for experi- 4. Motivate the Einstein equation and solve it to show ment and observation. The static, spherically symmetric where the spacetime geometries posited in (1) come Schwarzschild geometry (3.3) describes the solar system ex- from. perimental tests, spherically symmetric gravitational collapse, These are essentially the same four elements that comprise the and spherical black holes. The exactly homogeneous and deductive approach described in the previous section, but ina isotropic Friedman-Robertson-Walker (FRW) models provide different order. That order has considerable advantages for an excellent approximation to the structure and evolution of introducing general relativity at an intermediate level as we our universe from the big bang to the distant future. The now describe: linearized solutions of the Einstein equation about a flat space background describe detectable gravitational waves. A ‘physics first’ treatment of general relativity that concentrates A. Indications on the simplest solutions of the Einstein equation is thus im- mediately relevant for physically realistic and important situ- Less ‘New Math’ Up Front: To exhibit a spacetime geometry, ations. the only ‘new math’ ideas required are the metric and its re- No Stopping before Some Physics: Students with different lation to distances in space and time. To analyze the motion levels of experience, preparation, abilities, and preconceptions of test particles in these geometries, only the notions of four- will take differentlengths of time to acquire the basic concepts vectors and geodesics are needed. These three new mathemat- of general relativity. Beginning with the applications guaran- ical ideas are enoughto explain in detail a wide range of phys- tees that, wherever the course ends, students will have gained ical phenomena, such as most of those in Table 1. Further, some understanding of the basic physical phenomena (Table these three new mathematical ideas are among the simplest 1) which make general relativity so important and not sim- parts of a relativist’s tool kit to introduce at an intermediate ply of a mathematical structure which is the prerequisite fora level. Four-vectors are often familiar from special relativity. deductive approach. Geodesics viewed as curves of extremal proper time are spe- cial cases of . The idea of a metric can More Concrete, Less Abstract: Beginning with the applica- be motivated from the theory of surfaces in three-dimensional tions rather than the abstract structure of the theory is easier flat space. A general theory of tensors as linear maps from for some students because it is more concrete. Beginning with vectors into the real numbers is not required because only one the applications is also a surer way of driving home that gen- tensor — the metric — is ever used. eral relativity is a part of physics whose predictions can be observationally tested and not a branch of mathematics. The Simplest are the Most Physically Relevant: • The Sun is approximately spherical. Fewer Compromises: The analysis of the motion of test par- ticles and light rays in the simplest geometries can be carried • Spherical black holes exhibit many characteristic prop- out in essentially the same way as it is done in advanced text- erties of the most general black hole. books. No compromises of method or generality are needed. 6

Flexibility in Emphasis: Beginning with applications allows teaching it, or learning it better, is a part of every physics enough time to construct courses with different emphases; for instructor’s experience. The absence of previous instruction instance on black holes, gravitational waves, cosmology, or means that teaching an introductory general relativity course experimental tests. will often be the first exposure to the subject for many faculty. The process of learningby faculty is made easier by a ‘physics Closer to the Rest of the Undergraduate Physics Curriculum: first’ approach for the same reasons it is easier for students.A Calculations of the orbits of test particles and light rays to wider variety of faculty will find this approach both familiar explore curved spacetimes are exercises in mechanics. The and manageable. Specialists in gravitational physics are not symmetries of the simplest important solutions imply conser- necessary. vation laws. These can be used to reduce the calculation of orbits to one-dimensional motion in effective potentials. Even the content of the Einstein equation can be put in this form B. Counterindications for simple situations. This allows the intuition and techniques developed in intermediate mechanics to be brought to bear, both for qualitative understanding and quantitative prediction. No approach to teaching is without its price and the Conversely, this kind of example serves to extend and rein- ‘physics first’ approach to introducing general relativity is no force an understanding of mechanics. Indeed, in the author’s exception. The obvious disadvantage is that it does not fol- experience a few students are surprised to find that mechanics low the logically appealing deductive order, although it can is actually useful for something. The examples discussed in get to the same point in the end. A ‘physics first’ approach to the next section will help illustrate the close connection be- introducing general relativity may not be indicated in at least tween calculating geodesics and undergraduate mechanics. two circumstances: First, when there is enough time in the curriculum and enough student commitment to pursue the de- Fewer Prerequisites: The close connection with mechanics ductive order; second, when students already have significant described above and in the next section means that the only preparation in differential geometry. Even then however it is a essential prerequisite to a ‘physics first’ exposition of gen- possible alternative. A ‘physics first’ approach is probablynot eral relativity is an intermediate course in mechanics. Neither indicated when the mathematics is of central interest, as for quantum mechanics nor electrodynamics are necessary.Some students concentrating in mathematics, and for physics stu- acquaintance with special relativity is useful, but its brief dents who study Einstein’s theory mainly as an introduction treatment in many first year courses means that it is usually to the mathematics of string theory. necessary to develop it de novo at the beginning of an intro- ductory course in general relativity. Intermediate mechanics is thus the single essential physics prerequisite. This means VI. PARTICLE ORBITS OUTSIDE A SPHERICAL STAR that an introductory ‘physics first’ course in general relativity OR BLACK HOLE can be accessible to a wider range of physics majors at an ear- lier stage than courses designed to introduce students to other This section illustrates how the effective potential method frontier areas. developed in typical undergraduate mechanics courses can be Closer to Research Frontiers: Beginning with the applica- applied to important problems in general relativity. Of the tions means that students are closer sooner to the contempo- several possible illustrations, just one is considered here — rary frontiers of astrophysicsand that they can the relativistic effects on test particle orbits outside a spherical hear about in the seminars, read about in the newspapers, and star or black hole. Applications of this include the precession see on popular television programs. of perihelia of planets in the solar system and the location of the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) in an accretion disk More Opportunities for Undergraduate Participation in Re- powering an X-ray source. These examples also serve to illus- search: The applications of general relativity provide a broad trate how near the calculations of such effects are to starting range of topics for students to pursue independent study or principles in a ‘physics first’ approach to general relativity. even to make research contributions of contemporary interest. Nothing more than sketches of the calculations are in- More importantly, it is possible to identify problems from the tended. For more detail and the precise meaning of any quan- 3 applications that are conceptually and technically accessible tities involved, the reader should consult any standard text . to undergraduate physics majors and can be completed in the The Schwarzschild geometry specified in (3.3) describes limited time frame typically available. Problems that involve the curved spacetime outside a static, spherically symmetric solving for the behavior of test particles, light rays, and gyro- body of mass M. This is the geometry outside the Sun to an scopes are examples, as are questions involving linear gravi- excellent approximation, and is the geometry outside a spher- tational waves, black holes, and simple cosmological models. ical black hole. The motion of test particles is specified by the The ‘physics first’ approach to teaching general relativity en- principle of stationary proper time in (3.4). The argument in ables undergraduate participation in research because it treats such applications first.

Specialized Faculty Not Needed: Learning a subject while 3 We follow, with one minor simplifying exception, the notation in [11]. 7

The third term provides a general relativistic correction to the 0.04 plunge Newtonian effective potential. Figure 2 shows its effects. Circular orbits illustrate the importance of these effects. Veff 0.02 scattering c2 Newtonian gravity permits only one stable circular orbit for each ℓ. But in general relativity there are two circular orbits 0 for values of ℓ such at that used in Figure 2. There is a stable circular orbit at the minimum of the effective potential such as -0.02 bound one approximatingthe orbit of the Earth in its progress around the Sun. In addition there is an unstable circular orbit at the 10 20 30 40 radius of the maximum of the effective potential. r rs The radii of the stable circular orbits are easily found from (6.1b): FIG. 2: The effective potential Veff(r) for the radial motion of parti- cles in the Schwarzschild geometry outside a spherical star or black 2 2 1 2 ℓ GM 2 hole. The line shows Veff(r)/c defined in (6.1b) plotted against r = 1 + 1 − 12 . (6.2) 2 stab.circ. r/rs where rs = GM/c . The value of the param- 2GM    cℓ    eter is ℓ = 4.3GM/c2. The dotted line shows the Newtonian potential (the first two terms in (6.1b)) for the same value of ℓ. The qualitative For sufficiently small ℓ there are no stable circular orbits. That behavior of the orbits depends on the value of the energy parameter is because the effective potential (6.1b) is everywhere attrac- E. Values are shown for plunge orbits, scattering orbits, and bound tive for low ℓ. In contrast to Newtonian physics, general rela- orbits such as those executed by the planets in their motion about the tivity therefore implies that there is an innermost (smallest r) Sun. stable circular orbit (ISCO) whose radius is

2 rISCO = 6GM/c (6.3) the square bracket of that equation can be thought of as a La- θ˙ φ˙ grangian L(t˙,r˙, , ,r). Lagrange’s equations are the geodesic which is 1.5 times the characteristic radius of the black hole equations. 2 rs = 2GM/c . Time translation invariance implies a conserved energy per The ISCO is important for the astrophysics of black holes. unit rest mass E related to ∂L/∂t˙ . Spherical symmetry im- 4 The spectra of X-ray sources exhibit lines whose observed plies a conserved angular momentum per unit rest mass ℓ for shapes can in principle be used to infer the properties of the ∂ ∂φ˙ orbits in the equatorial plane which is proportional to L/ . black hole engine [32]. The shape of the line is determined by 5 − A third integral of the motion L = 1. arises just from the several factors but importantly affected by the gravitational definition of proper time. This integral can be combined with redshift. That is maximum for radiation from parts of the ac- the other to to find an effective energy integral for the radial cretion disk closest to the black hole, ie from the ISCO. This motion: defines the red end of the observed line6. Another important prediction of general relativity derivable 1 dr 2 E from the effective potential is the shape of bound orbits such = τ +Veff(r) (6.1a) 2 d  as those of the planets. The shape of an orbit in the equato- rial plane (θ = π/2) may be specified by giving the azimuthal where angle φ as a function of r. The orbits close if the total an- ∆φ GM ℓ2 GMℓ2 gle swept out in the passage away from the inner turning Veff(r)= − + − . (6.1b) point and back again is 2π. This can be calculated from (6.1) r 2r2 c2r3 and the angular momentum integral ℓ = r2(dφ/dτ). Writing Here, r is the Schwarzschild radial coordinate of the test par- dφ/dr = (dφ/dτ)/(dr/dτ) and using these two relations gives ticle and τ is the proper time along its world line. The mass an expression for dφ/dr as a function of r, E, and ℓ which can of the test particle is absent from these expressions. It can- be integrated. The result is cels out because of the equality of gravitational and inertial 2 −1/2 mass. Eq. (6.1a) has the same form as the energy integral for ∆φ = 2 dr(ℓ/r )[2(E −Veff(r))] (6.4) a Newtonian central force problem. The first two terms in the Z effective potential (6.1b) have the same form as a Newtonian where the integral is from the radius of the inner turning point gravitational potential with a Newtonian centrifugal barrier. to the outer one. When the relativistic term in (6.1b) is absent, ∆φ = 2π for all E and ℓ. That is the closing of the Keplerian ellipses of Newtonian mechanics. The relativistic correction

4 In [11], E and ℓ are defined as an energy and angular momentum per unit rest energy rather than per unit rest mass as here. With that definition of E both terms on the right hand side of (6.1a) would be divided by c2. That is the minor exception alluded to in the previous footnote. 6 Realistic black holes are generally rotating, but the analysis then is not 5 ‘Integral’ here is used in the sense of classical mechanics, not in the sense qualitatively different from that for the non-rotating Schwarzschild black of the inverse of differentiation. hole. 8 to Veff makes the orbit precess by small amount δφ = ∆φ − 2π physics majors at the University of California, Santa Barbara on each pass. To lowest order in 1/c2 this is for approximately thirty years. In the limited span of a quarter the author is usually able to review special relativity, motivate GM 2 gravity as geometry, derive the orbits in the Schwarzschild δφ = 6π . (6.5)  cℓ  geometry in detail, describe the experimental tests, introduce black holes, and develop the Friedman-Robertson-Walkercos- In the solar system the precession is largest for Mercury but mological models. A semester provides more opportunities. still only 43′′ per century. The confirmation of that prediction At Santa Barbara this course is routinely taught by faculty [33] is an important test of general relativity. from many different areas of physics — general relativity of The purpose of this section was not to explain or even em- course, but also elementary particle physics and astrophysics. phasize the two effects of general relativity on particle orbits It has been taught by both theorists and experimentalists. For that were described here. Rather it was to show three things. some of these colleagues teaching this course was their first First, that a standard technique developed in undergraduate serious experience with general relativity. They usually report mechanics can be used to calculate important predictions of that they were successful and enjoyed it. general relativity. The second purpose was to show how close these important applications can come to starting principles in In the author’s experience students are excited by general a ‘physics first’ approach to teaching general relativity. Intro- relativity and motivated to pursue it. Often it is their first ex- duce the Schwarzschild geometry (3.3), use the principle of perience with a subject directly relevant to current research. stationary proper time (3.4) to find the geodesic equations or It is one of the few contemporary subjects that can be taught their integrals (6.1), use the effective potential method to qual- without quantum mechanics or electromagnetism. itatively and quantitatively understand important properties of The author has written a text based on the ‘physics first’ the orbits e.g. (6.3) and (6.4). That is just three steps from the approach [11] which comes with a solutions manual available basic ideas of metric and geodesics to important applications. to instructors for the approximately 400 problems of graded Third, both of the applications treated here can be immedi- levels of difficulty. ately related to contemporary observation and experiment. Particle orbits in the Schwarzschild geometry are not the ‘Physics first’ is not the only way of introducing general only important problems in which the effective potential relativity to undergraduate physics majors, but it works. method is useful. Motion in the geometry of a rotating black hole, the motion of test light rays in the Schwarzschild geome- try, and the evolution of the Friedman-Robertson-Walker cos- mological models are further examples where it can be use- fully applied. Acknowledgments

VII. CONCLUSION Thanks are due to Bill Hiscock, Ted Jacobson, Richard Price, and Francesc Roig for critical readings of the A one quarter (∼ 28 lectures) ‘physics first’ course in gen- manuscript. Preparation of this paper was supported in part eral relativity has been a standard junior/senior elective for by NSF grant PHY02-44764.

[1] W. Hiscock, in a talk presented at the 2005 April Meeting of the [10] R. Hakim, Introduction to Relativistic Gravitation, Cambridge APS, Tampa, FL, April 16, 2005. University Press, Cambridge, UK (1999). [2] M. Berry, Principles of Cosmology and Gravitation, Institute of [11] J.B. Hartle, Gravity, Addison-Wesley, San Francisco (2003). Physics, Bristol, UK and Philadelphia (1993). [12] L. Hughston and K.P. Tod, An Introduction to General Relativ- [3] W. Burke, Spacetime, Geometry, Cosmology, University Sci- ity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990). ence Books, Mill Valley (1980). [13] R. D’Inverno, Introducing Einstein’s Relativity, Clarendon [4] J. Callahan, The Geometry of Spacetime: An Introduction to Press, New York and Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK Special and General Relativity, Springer, New York (2000). (1995). [5] T.-P. Cheng, Relativity, Gravitation, and Cosmology: A Basic [14] I.R. Kenyon, General Relativity, Oxford University Press, Ox- Introduction, Oxford, New York (2005). ford, UK and New York (1990). [6] C. Clarke, Elementary General Relativity, Edward Arnold, [15] M. Ludvigsen, General Relativity: A Geometric Approach, London, UK (1979) and Wiley, New York (1980). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York [7] G.F.R. Ellis and R.M. Williams, Flat and Curved Spacetime, (1999). Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK (1988). [16] J.L. Martin, General Relativity: A Guide to its Consequences [8] J. Foster and J.D. Nightiingale, A Short Course in General Rel- for Gravity and Cosmology, E. Horwood, Chichester, UK and ativity, Springer-Verlag, New York (1995). Halsted Press, New York (1988). [9] R. Geroch, General Relativity from A to B, University of [17] H. O’Hanian and R. Ruffini, Gravitation and Spacetime, Nor- Chicago Press, Chicago (1978). ton, New York (1994). 9

[18] W. Rindler, Essential Relativity: special, general, and cosmo- parameters, Ap. J. Suppl. 148, 175–194 (2003); J.L. Tonry, et logical, Springer-Verlag, New York (1977). al., Cosmological results from high-z supernovae, Ap. J. 594, [19] B.F. Schutz, A First Course in General Relativity, Cambridge 1–24 (2003). University Press, Cambridge, UK (1985). [28] L. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields, [20] B.F. Schutz, Gravity From the Ground Up, Cambridge Univer- Pergamon Press, London (1962). sity Press, Cambridge, UK and New York (2003). [29] C.W. Misner, K.S. Thorne, and J.A. Wheeler, Gravitation, [21] E.F. Taylor and J.A. Wheeler, Exploring Black Holes, Addison- W.H. Freeman, San Francisco (1970). Wesley Longman, San Francisco (2000). [30] R. Wald, General Relativity, University of Chicago Press, [22] P. Tourrenc, Relativity and Gravitation, Cambridge University Chicago (1984). Press, Cambridge, UK (1997). [31] S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology, John Wiley & Sons, [23] e.g. B. Bertotti B.L. Less, P. Tortora, A Test of General Relativ- New York (1972). ity Using Radio Links with the Cassini Spacecraft, Nature 425, [32] See, e.g. C.S. Reynolds and M.A. Nowak, Fluorescent Iron 374-376 (2003). Lines as a Probe of Astrophysical Black Hole Systems, [24] N. Ashby, Relativity and the global positioning system, Physics Reports 377, 389 (2003); A.C. Fabian, K. Iwasawa, Phys. Today 55, no 5, 41–47 (2002). C.S. Reynolds, A.J. Young, Broad Iron Lines in Active Galactic [25] J. Hartle, et al., Gravitational Physics: Exploring the Structure Nuclei, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific of Space and Time, (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 112, 1145 (2000). 1999). [33] I.I. Shapiro, Solar System Tests of General Relativity, in Gen- [26] W. Freedman, B. Madore, et al., Final Results from The Hub- eral Relativity and Gravitation: 12th International Conference ble Space Telescope Project to Measure the Hubble Constant, on General Relativity and Gravitation ed by N. Ashby, D.F. Ap. J. 553, 47 (2001). Bartlett, and W. Wyss, (Cambridge University Press, Cam- [27] D.N. Spergel et al., First year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy bridge, 1990), 313-330. probe (WMAP) observations: Determination of cosmological