DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Waiheke Island Claim

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Waiheke Island Claim Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz REPORT OF THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL ON THE WAIHEKE ISLAND CLAIM (WAI 10) WAITANGI TRIBUNAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WELLINGTON NEW ZEALAND June 1987 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Original cover design by Cliff Whiting, invoking the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi and the consequent development of Maori–Pakeha history interwoven in Aotearoa, in a pattern not yet completely known, still unfolding. National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-Publication data New Zealand. Waitangi Tribunal. Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Waiheke Island claim (Wai 10). 2nd ed Wellington, NZ : The Tribunal, 1989. 1 v. (Waitangi Tribunal reports, 0113–4124) “June 1987.” First ed published in 1987 as : In the matter of the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 and in the matter of a claim by Hariata Gordon for Ngati Paoa commonly called the Waiheke claim : report to the Minister of Maori Affairs. ISBN 0–908810–07–5 1. Maoris—Land tenure. 2. Waiheke Island (NZ) 3. Waitangi, Treaty of, 1840. I. Title. II. Series : Waitangi Tribunal reports ; 333.10993113 First published June 1987 in photocopy format by the Waitangi Tribunal Department of Justice Wellington, New Zealand Second edition 1989 This corrected electronic facsimile reproduction of the second edition 2012 Crown copyright reserved Waitangi Tribunal Reports ISSN 0113–4124 Waiheke Island Report (Wai 10) ISBN 0–908810–07–5 Typeset, printed and bound by the Government Printing Office Wellington, New Zealand ii Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER of the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 AND IN THE MATTER of a claim by Hariata Gordon for Ngati Paoa commonly called THE WAIHEKE CLAIM REPORT TO THE MINISTER OF MAORI AFFAIRS This report, save the recommendations on pages 100 and 101 is not for public release before promulgation of a decision of the Court of Appeal in New Zealand Maori Council v Attorney-General, CA54/87. CHAIRMAN iii Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz CONTENTS 1. The Waiheke Claim 1 2. Ngati Paoa 3 3. The Sale of Waiheke 11 4. The Development of Development Schemes 15 5. The Waiheke Development Scheme 21 6. Disposal of the Waiheke Scheme 24 7. Reaction 28 8. Overview and Recommendations 30 Appendix I The Written Claim as Filed by Hariata Gordon on 8 March 1985 49 Appendix II Relief Sought in Counsel’s closing Address 51 Appendix III Record of Hearing 52 iv Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz The Hon K T Wetere Minister of Maori Affairs Parliament Buildings WELLINGTON We report to you on what we have come to call 1. THE WAIHEKE CLAIM The claim has two elements. The first describes the immediate cause of complaint—that the Board of Maori Affairs (the Board) disposed of lands comprising the Waiheke Development Scheme (the Waiheke Scheme) to the Waiheke Station Evans Partnership (the Evans Partnership) when it ought, the claimants say, have passed the land to the Ngati Paoa tribe. The second element describes the gravamen of the complaint, that Crown policies fail to support the tribal groups that were parties to the Treaty of Waitangi, and in particular, those tribes like Ngati Paoa now so lacking for land or other endowments that they are threatened with extinction. We begin with brief descriptions of the Waiheke Scheme and the current circumstances of Ngati Paoa before assessing both aspects of the claim in more detail. The Waiheke Scheme comprises some 2,050 acres at Onetangi to the north-east of Waiheke Island in the Hauraki Gulf with access by road to the wharf at Man-O-War Bay. Though the land has been developed by the Board of Maori Affairs, it is not Maori land. The Board bought it with ‘taxpayer’ money from private owners, and it is Crown land. In much earlier years the land was owned by Ngati Paoa, for Waiheke Island was once the northern sentinel of that tribe guarding the seaways to their mainland villages on the west coast of the Hauraki Gulf. But Ngati Paoa have not owned the land since 1858 when some 11,000 acres that included what is now the Waiheke Scheme was sold to the Crown. The Crown granted the land in many small allotments to various settlements. Eventually several of those allotments came into the ownership of one K M Scott. The Board of Maori Affairs was not involved at all until 1965 when it undertook the development of Mrs Scott’s acquisitions. The Board spent heavily on development. Later it bought the land from Mrs Scott. It became apparent however that the Board’s farming opera- tions could not sustain the cost and in 1983, the Board agreed to alienate the land by lease with purchase rights to the Evans Partnership. The current troubles then surfaced. Members of Ngati Paoa considered the Board ought to have preferred an arrangement with them for tradition- ally Waiheke was their land. The Board, it was considered, had a commit- ment to Maori people and was bound to have regard to Maori circumstances and customs not least of which required recognition of tribal boundaries and tribal needs. On 30 January 1984 a group of Ngati Paoa occupied the land to protest the proposed alienation. They were not removed until arrested on the Board’s charges of trespass. In the meantime this claim had been filed and when the trespass charges were disposed of, the claim was heard. The claimants sought a recommen- dation that the lease be declared “null and void” and that the Board negotiate with the tribe to establish a Ngati Paoa trust upon the land. 1 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz The full text of the claim was set out in a document filed by Hariata Gordon on 8 March 1985. Though it came in the form of a submission it outlined the immediate concerns clearly enough. Apart from some abbre- viation to the introduction the claim is as printed in Appendix I. In her closing submissions, Counsel for the claimants amended the remedies sought and asked for relief in four areas. These are described in Appendix II. A summary of the proceedings is contained in Appendix III. Upon hearing the immediate cause of complaint, that the scheme should have passed to a Ngati Paoa Tribal Trust, it was soon apparent the claim addressed much wider issues—for the real plight of Ngati Paoa is that it has been rendered almost landless. It is a tribe that lost with its land, its own identity, and yet, it was this once powerful tribe that held in former days a large slice of what is now Auckland and a substantial part of the Hauraki Gulf and Plains. The tribe suffered more than most the bad effects of European contact and then for no other reason than that it occupied some most desirable real estate and held to a strategic land corridor that led the way to other good pickings both north and south. In the result nearly all of its territory, being most at risk, was alienated early, last century in fact. Lacking a land base for its endowment, Ngati Paoa was denied the opportunity afforded other tribes to capitalise on the good effects of European settlement as an agricultural economy brought New Zealand to prosperity. Such is the lot of landless tribes. By the middle of this century one might well have asked, did Ngati Paoa exist or didn’t they ? Whether they were unnoticed when the Board disposed of the Waiheke Scheme is a question to be dealt with later, but certainly Ngati Paoa thought they were over- looked, and being by-passed, slighted. It was necessary in their view to remind the bureaucracy that though the land was no longer theirs, the land was still there to behold and Ngati Paoa was still here too. Thus the Waiheke occupation was more than an attempt to recapture a part of the world that once belonged to them. It was a proclamation of survival, and a call to the scattered remnants of a once powerful tribe to come together, to seek an ancestral base from which they might recapture the pride of their forbears and bring hope to a younger generation that might otherwise be lost to the cites. So it was that this claim illuminated broad issues sparked off by the arrangements for Waiheke Station and exposed a range of questions that Ngati Paoa introduced to us. It is timely now that we should introduce Ngati Paoa, the people and their land, to trace their progress to 1840, when they sought a pact in the Treaty of Waitangi, and to outline their decline, focusing thereafter on that part of their ancestral land that led to this inquiry—the land on Waiheke Island. 2 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz 2. NGATI PAOA The story of Ngati Paoa begins with the Tainui people of Waikato, probably in the 1600s when Paoa, younger brother of Manuta, left his home at Taupiri on the Waikato River to marry Tukutuku, great grand- daughter of Maratuahu, eponymous ancestor of the Hauraki tribes. In the course of time the children of Paoa and his followers dominated the western shores of the Hauraki Gulf where they lived close to the related tribes of the Marutuahu compact, Ngati Maru, Tamatera, Ngati Whanaunga and those earlier tribes absorbed by them, Ngati Huarere and Ngati Hei.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kaihu Valley and the Ripiro West Coast to South Hokianga
    ~ 1 ~ KAIHU THE DISTRICT NORTH RIPIRO WEST COAST SOUTH HOKIANGA HISTORY AND LEGEND REFERENCE JOURNAL FOUR EARLY CHARACTERS PART ONE 1700-1900 THOSE WHO STAYED AND THOSE WHO PASSED THROUGH Much has been written by past historians about the past and current commercial aspects of the Kaipara, Kaihu Valley and the Hokianga districts based mostly about the mighty Kauri tree for its timber and gum but it would appear there has not been a lot recorded about the “Characters” who made up these districts. I hope to, through the following pages make a small contribution to the remembrance of some of those main characters and so if by chance I miss out on anybody that should have been noted then I do apologise to the reader. I AM FROM ALL THOSE WHO HAVE COME BEFORE AND THOSE STILL TO COME THEY ARE ME AND I AM THEM ~ 2 ~ CHAPTERS CHAPTER 1 THE EARLY CHARACTERS NAME YEAR PLACE PAGE Toa 1700 Waipoua 5 Eruera Patuone 1769 Northland 14 Te Waenga 1800 South Hokianga 17 Pokaia 1805 North Kaipara West coast to Hokianga 30 Murupaenga 1806 South Hokianga – Ripiro Coast 32 Kawiti Te Ruki 1807 Ahikiwi – Ripiro Coast 35 Hongi Hika 1807 North Kaipara West coast to Hokianga 40 Taoho 1807 Kaipara – Kaihu Valley 44 Te Kaha-Te Kairua 1808 Ripiro Coast 48 Joseph Clarke 1820 Ripiro Coast 49 Samuel Marsden 1820 Ripiro Coast 53 John Kent 1820 South Hokianga 56 Jack John Marmon 1820 North Kaipara West coast to Hokianga 58 Parore Te Awha 1821 North Kaipara West coast to Hokianga 64 John Martin 1827 South Hokianga 75 Moetara 1830 South Hokianga - Waipoua 115 Joel Polack
    [Show full text]
  • First Years at Hokianga 1827 – 1836
    First Years at Hokianga 1827-1836 by Rev.C.H.Laws FIRST YEARS AT HOKIANGA 1827 – 1836 In a previous brochure, entitled "Toil and Adversity at Whangaroa," the story of the Methodist Mission to New Zealand is told from its initiation in 1823 to its disruption and the enforced flight of the missionaries in 1827. After a brief stay with members of the Anglican Mission at the Bay of Islands the Methodist party sailed for Sydney in the whaler "Sisters" on January 28th, 1827, arriving at their destination on February 9th. It consisted of Nathaniel Turner and Mrs. Turner, with their three children, John Hobbs, James Stack and Mr. and Mrs. Luke Wade, and they took with them a Maori girl and two native lads. William White had left Whangaroa for England on September 19th, 1825, and at the time of the flight had not returned. The catastrophe to the Mission was complete. The buildings had been burned to the ground, the live stock killed; books and records destroyed, and the property of the Mission now consisted only of a few articles in store in Sydney which had not been forwarded to New Zealand. Wesley Historical Society (NZ) Publication #4(2) 1943 Page 1 First Years at Hokianga 1827-1836 by Rev.C.H.Laws Chapter I The departure of the Mission party for Sydney is seen, as we look back upon it, to have been the right course. Sydney was their headquarters, they were a large party and could not expect to stay indefinitely with their Anglican friends, and it could not be foreseen when they would be able to re-establish the work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States and New Zealand Robert J
    Volume 111 | Issue 3 Article 11 April 2009 An Indigenous Lens into Comparative Law: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States and New Zealand Robert J. Miller Lewis & Clark Law School Jacinta Ruru Faculty of Law, University of Otago, New Zealand Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation Robert J. Miller & Jacinta Ruru, An Indigenous Lens into Comparative Law: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States and New Zealand, 111 W. Va. L. Rev. (2009). Available at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol111/iss3/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the WVU College of Law at The Research Repository @ WVU. It has been accepted for inclusion in West Virginia Law Review by an authorized editor of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Miller and Ruru: An Indigenous Lens into Comparative Law: The Doctrine of Discover AN INDIGENOUS LENS INTO COMPARATIVE LAW: THE DOCTRINE OF DISCOVERY IN THE UNITED STATES AND NEW ZEALAND Robert J. Miller* JacintaRuru** 1. THE DOCTRINE OF DISCOVERY ........................................................... 852 A. England and Discovery.......................................................... 854 B. The Elements of Discovery .................................................... 856 H. THE DOCTRINE OF DISCOVERY IN UNITED STATES LAW ................... 858 A. The Colonial Law of Discovery ............................................. 858 B. The State Law of Discovery ................................................... 861 C. United States Law and Discovery to 1823 ............................. 864 D. Discovery and Manifest Destiny ............................................ 871 III. THE DOCTRINE OF DISCOVERY IN NEW ZEALAND LAW .................... 876 A. Claiming Sovereignty: 1840 .................................................. 878 B. Sym onds 1847 .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Emption, the Treaty of Waitangi and the Politics of Crown Purchase
    Pre-emption, the Treaty of Waitangi and the Politics of Crown Purchase THE TREATY OF WAITANGI was once seen as something unique to the late 1830s, hurriedly devised and reflecting the specific humanitarian, political or international pressures of the moment.1 After the work of Claudia Orange and the new legal studies of the Treaty and international law, this idea of uniqueness is no longer sustainable.2 The Treaty expressed a series of views about sovereignty and property extending back at least to the early colonization of North America.3 But, while not unique, the Treaty of Waitangi was certainly an unusual example of treaties with indigenous peoples, especially in its time. Most North American treaties followed warfare against Native American nations, and ceded large areas of territory to the Crown or the United States. The uncompromising protection of Maori rights to land and other property in the Treaty of Waitangi was unusual, especially when its drafters anticipated large-scale colonization to follow almost immediately. Most of the historical debate has been on the diverse political influences on the evolution of Colonial Office policy between 1835 and 1840,4 but more recently, attention has turned to the Maori side of the Treaty, exploring the nature and limitations of Maori understandings of and agreement to the 1 K. Sinclair, A History of New Zealand, Harmondsworth, 1969, p.71; I. Wards, The Shadow of the Land, A Study of British Policy and Racial Conflict in New Zealand, 1832-1852, Wellington, 1968. p.49. 2 C. Orange, The Treaty of Waitangi, Wellington, 1987; P.
    [Show full text]
  • Artist: Period/Style: Patron: Material/Technique: Form
    TITLE:The Ambum Stone LOCATION: Papua New Guinea DATE: 1500 BCE ARTIST: PERIOD/STYLE: Prehistoric Oceanic Art PATRON: MATERIAL/TECHNIQUE:Greywacke FORM: A composite human/animal figure, perhaps an anteater head and a human body. It has a pleasing shape and smooth surface, and the slightly shiny patina on some of its raised details suggest it has been well handled. It was made from greywacke stone, and its finished shape may suggest the original shape the stone it was carved from. Carved in the form of some kind of animal, its features are rounded and include a freestanding neck, elegantly curved head and long nose, and upper limbs that hug its torso and appear to enclose a cupped space above its belly. FUNCTION: The Ambum Stone is a decorative pestle. Sculpted stones uncovered in Papua New Guinea fall into three different categories: figurines, mortars, and pestles. These objects take the form of both land- and air-dwelling animals, anthropomorphic creatures, and human figures. The Ambum Stone is one of the earliest stone objects, hailing from way back in 3500 B.C.E., and would have been created as a pestle. It's likely that the Ambum Stone was used for fertility or burial rituals. The discovery of the Ambum Stone sheds light on the supernatural and religious beliefs of the ancient New Guinea peoples. The early stone sculptures have supernatural significance. These special mortars and pestles were used in religious rituals. New Guinea peoples believed the supernatural powers of these sculptures and the animals they depicted helped with fertility, hunting, and burial rites.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruapekapeka Heritage Assessment
    Heritage Assessment: Ruapekapeka Pa and Battlefield Maria Butcher May 2011 Contents Site Overview 3 History Description 3 Fabric Description 9 Cultural Connections 11 Significance 11 Management Chronology 13 Management Recommendations 14 Conclusions 15 Sources Consulted 16 Appendix A: Aerial photograph of Ruapekapeka Historic Reserve 18 Appendix B: Archaeological Plans 19 Appendix C: Contemporary Maps and Plans 21 Appendix D: Planting Plan 23 Heritage Assessment: Ruapekapeka Pa and Battlefield Maria Butcher Department of Conservation Whangaeri Area Office 2011 Cover Image: Waharoa at the entrance of the pa carved by Te Warihi Hetaraka (photo credit: Department of Conservation) Image this page: Department of Conservation Peer Reviewed by: Joan Mainguy 2 Site Overview It is difficult to overstate the significance of Ruapekapeka Pa and Battlefield. The battle in 1845/6 was the culmination of the War of the North, when Maori stood against the might of the British Empire. It was an armed response to the Treaty of Waitangi, seeking to prevent the erosion of Maori mana. Ruapekapeka is the best preserved of all the New Zealand Wars sites, a tangible connection to events which shaped New Zealand society as it is today.1 The Ruapekapeka Historic Reserve is accessed by a gravel road off State Highway 1, about 35 km north of Whangarei. Nine and half hectares in size, the reserve encompasses the pa itself, the British forward position, and part of the British main camp. The pa and British forward position are mown on a regular basis, and the reserve boasts a sealed car park, formed tracks, interpretation signs, and a beautiful carved waharoa (entranceway).
    [Show full text]
  • Colonising Concepts of the Good Citizen, Law's Deceptions, and the Treaty of Waitangi
    Law Text Culture Volume 4 Issue 2 Article 4 1998 Colonising concepts of the good citizen, law's deceptions, and the treaty of Waitangi Nan Seuffert University of Waikato, New Zealand, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/ltc Recommended Citation Seuffert, Nan, Colonising concepts of the good citizen, law's deceptions, and the treaty of Waitangi, Law Text Culture, 4, 1998, 69-104. Available at:https://ro.uow.edu.au/ltc/vol4/iss2/4 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Colonising concepts of the good citizen, law's deceptions, and the treaty of Waitangi Abstract The dominant story of the founding of New Zealand is a simple one of cession of sovereignty by the indigenous Maori people to the British in the Treaty of Waitangi 1840. One notable aspect of the dominant legal portrayals of the Treaty signing, and subsequent legal cases, is their repression of the glaring discrepancies between the Maori version of the Treaty, signed by most Maori leaders, and the English versions. Historical arguments suggest that this discrepancy is the result ofdeliberate deceptio.n on the part of British missionaries translating the Treaty into Maori (Walker 1990: 9L Walker 1989: 269, Ross 1972: 20, Ross 1972 NZ]H: 140-141). I argue that this act ofdeception was necessary to the colonisation of New Zealand, and to the formation of New Zealand as a unified nation-state. The deceptive, or 'appropriative' mistranslation (Constable 1996: 634635), of the Treatywas the performance of an ideal of the forwardgazing (white, male) citizen who has successfully shed his history (Davidson 1997: 19, Bernal 1994: 125-127); it served both the individual interests of the citizen/subject translator and the interests of nation-building.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Wars Sources at the Hocken Collections Part 1 – 1840S
    Reference Guide New Zealand Wars Sources at the Hocken Collections Part 1 – 1840s Fragment of the Treaty of Waitangi in te Reo Māori. Facsimiles of the Declaration of Independence and the Treaty of Waitangi. Wellington: Govt. Printer, 1976 Hocken Collections/Te Uare Taoka o Hākena, University of Otago Library Nau Mai Haere Mai ki Te Uare Taoka o Hākena: Welcome to the Hocken Collections He mihi nui tēnei ki a koutou kā uri o kā hau e whā arā, kā mātāwaka o te motu, o te ao whānui hoki. Nau mai, haere mai ki te taumata. As you arrive We seek to preserve all the taoka we hold for future generations. So that all taoka are properly protected, we ask that you: place your bags (including computer bags and sleeves) in the lockers provided leave all food and drink including water bottles in the lockers (we have a lunchroom off the foyer which everyone is welcome to use) bring any materials you need for research and some ID in with you sign the Readers’ Register each day enquire at the reference desk first if you wish to take digital photographs Beginning your research This guide gives examples of the types of material relating to the New Zealand Wars held at the Hocken. All items must be used within the library. As the collection is large and constantly growing not every item is listed here, but you can search for other material on our Online Public Access Catalogues: for books, theses, journals, magazines, newspapers, maps, and audiovisual material, use Library Search|Ketu.
    [Show full text]
  • The Whakakotahitanga Flagstaff and Its Place in New Zealand History
    ‘A Living Thing’: The Whakakotahitanga Flagstaff and its Place in New Zealand History VINCENT O’MALLEY The story of Hone Heke’s successful efforts in felling the flagstaff upon Maiki Hill at Kororareka four times between July 1844 and March 1845 – the fourth occasion marking the start of the Northern War between the British with their Maori allies and Heke’s followers – is widely known.1 The fate of the flagstaff after the war came to an inconclusive end at Ruapekapeka in January 1846 is, however, less appreciated. Yet the flagstaff’s subsequent history reveals just as much about the broader relationship between northern Maori and the Crown as the events upon Maiki Hill between 1844 and 1845 disclose about the breakdown in that relationship. Throughout the period between 1846 and 1857, Ngapuhi leaders at various times proposed to re-erect a flagstaff. Their suggestions met with at best lukewarm support from Crown officials, who worried that, regardless of who erected the flagstaff, the Crown would ultimately be required to defend it. Hence, when the pou kara known as Whakakotahitanga was erected on Maiki Hill in January 1858, Crown assistance was minimal. The decision to erect the new flagstaff had been made solely by northern Maori and was intended as an emblem of reconciliation and unity in the wake of the Northern War. These sentiments were scarcely reciprocated. Crown officials remained apprehensive about the strength of northern Maori ‘attachment’ to the government and feared that the flagstaff might again become a source of trouble and unrest. Later, as the government gradually gained a firmer grip over the north, such fears were put to bed.
    [Show full text]
  • Hobbs a Man with a Mission (A Story of Adventure and Love)
    John Hobbs A Man with a Mission (A story of adventure and love) Music: Gary Daverne ONZM Words: Dorothy Tomlinson www.garydaverne.gen.nz The story is set in the Hokianga and Bay of Islands regions in the North Island of New Zealand from 1821, leading up to the Treaty of Waitangi in 1840. John Hobbs, is a young Englishman from Thanet, who is compelled to join the Wesleyan Mission in the Hokianga, after hearing the story of the 1809 incident known as “The Burning of the Boyd”, where a young Maori Chief was beaten and flogged by the crew of an English sailing ship. His Maori warriors waited until nightfall, then taking their revenge. An elder John Hobbs narrates the story. He tells of the establishing of the Mission in the region, portraying the relationships, frustrations, conflicts and troubled times with the early settlers, the native Maori people and their Chiefs, especially, Patuone and Tamati Waka Nene. Also the very colourful life of the Rev. William White. There is Hobb’s special love for his devoted wife, Jane, their learning, teaching and preaching, their unjustified exile to Tonga, then his reinstatement two years later to the Wesleyan Mission in the Hokianga, culminating in the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi at Horeke, in the Hokianga, where Hobbs and Patuone resolve to “GO FORWARD TOGETHER AS BROTHERS” Actual quotations from the diaries of John Hobbs are used in the script. There is limited dialogue, all recitative (music underscored),. The cast: Five main male leads: John Hobbs (the older John Hobbs as the narrator) Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Confiscation of Maori Land
    335 Confiscation of Maori land Michael R. Litchfield* New Zealand is a multi-cultural western style democracy in which the treat­ ment of its peoples in the past as well as the present must be shown to be fair and reasonable. This article is written in the hope that the facts surrounding the extensive confiscation of Maori land during the Anglo-Maori Land Wars of the 1860s can now be looked at honestly and objectively. It is concluded that these confiscations were unnecessary and unjust. Compensation in land and money is the only suitable solution. I. INTRODUCTION During the years 1864 to 1867 the New Zealand Goveernment confiscated approximately 3J million acres of Maori tribal land on the ground that the owners of the land were in rebellion against the sovereignty of the Crown. The confiscations were made under the authority of the New Zealand Settlements Act 1863 and its amendments.1 These Acts were passed during the so-called Maori Wars and their purpose was to enable confiscation of Maori land to punish and deter Maori “rebellion” and to prevent further insurrection by estab­ lishing military settlements on the land. It was hoped that the confiscated land could be sold to settlers and the proceeds of sale used to pay for the cost of the wars. The legislation and the war themselves were the result of the demand by settlers for land and not because Maori land owners had rejected the Queen’s authority. Land was confiscated from both loyal and “rebel” Maori land owners. Subsequent to the confiscations approximately half of the confiscated lands were given back to, or purchased from, the original owners.
    [Show full text]
  • The Māori Right to Development and New Forms of Property
    THE MĀORI RIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT AND NEW FORMS OF PROPERTY Edward Greig A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Bachelor of Laws (Honours) at the University of Otago October 2010 Acknowledgements To Jacinta Ruru, thank you for your limitless enthusiasm, encouragement and guidance. To Caroline, thank you for your invaluable love, support and proof-reading. And thank you to Vanessa, Greg and everyone else who listened to my thoughts and responded with their own. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter One: The Right to Development .................................................................................. 2 Sources ................................................................................................................................... 3 Sources of the Right to Development .................................................................................... 4 Principles of the Right to Development in New Zealand ...................................................... 9 Principle of Options ............................................................................................................. 19 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 19 Chapter Two: Application of the Right by the Waitangi Tribunal .......................................... 21 The Muriwhenua Fishing Claim Report
    [Show full text]