Building Raised Beds

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Building Raised Beds WWW.ECOLOGYCENTER.ORG | 510.548.2220 X 233 | [email protected] Building Raised Beds There are many reasons you might choose Lining the Raised Bed to build structures to grow vegetables, herbs, and other plants: You can line your raised bed to make it more durable and to prevent toxics from • To avoid toxics in soil such as lead or leaching into the soil. For lining, use arsenic landscape fabric found at garden supply • To avoid drainage problems that some stores or cloth fabric from clothing. Avoid soils can present non-porous plastic, as it can retain too • To reduce back strain. Raised beds much water and discourage beneficial can be built at a good height for a insects and worms. A lining can make an wheelchair. existing raised bed safer, but if your raised • To add an aesthetically pleasing bed is made of creosote railroad ties or feature in the garden arsenic-treated wood, it’s best to remove • To make it easier to add nutrients to the wood from the yard altogether to the working layer of the soil prevent continued migration of the toxics. • To improve yields by reducing how To keep gophers and moles out of your much of the soil is walked on and plants, line the bed with metal hardware compacted cloth or staple gopher/rat mesh to the • To clearly separate the growing area bottom of the bed. from pathways for easier weed control • To enable gardening in paved spaces Treated and Untreated Wood Some pressure treated wood is toxic, while Choosing Your Materials some is not. The most toxic pressure- When choosing materials for your treated wood, chromated copper arsenate raised bed, consider durability, toxicity, (CCA), can often be identified by its environmental impact, affordability, staple-like indentations and greenish aesthetics, maintenance requirements, tint, but not all types of CCA wood have and how permanent or portable you want these identifiers. To make matters more your raised bed to be. confusing, wood pressure-treated with Alkaline Copper Quartenary (ACQ), which Reused materials tend to be the most is considered safe, also appears green. If affordable. Their environmental impact is the wood was bought or the structure built low because they don’t require forestry, prior to 2003, the lumber was most likely mining, manufacture, or long-distance treated with toxic CCA. To be sure, buy an Building Raised Beds transport. Find free or low-cost materials arsenic test kit from your local hardware on Craigslist or Freecycle, at your local store or online. salvage yard, or in your own backyard. The Ecology Center’s EcoDirectory If your existing raised beds were built with contains Bay Area resource listings, CCA-treated lumber, remove the structure including local salvage yards. to avoid the continued migration of arsenic through the yard. Even if the soil is One low-tech method that saves money replaced, the arsenic will migrate into the and has minimal environmental impact new soil. Dispose of the wood at a local involves building a mound of soil and waste facility as construction debris. If you straw directly on top of the existing choose to keep the bed, you may grow ground, without a structure to contain it. ornamental plants in it rather than food. This method, which permaculturists favor, builds nutrients and adds tilth to impacted If you use untreated wood for your bed, land. If your aim is to avoid toxics, this use natural wood treatments like flaxseed method might not be sufficient. oil or wax. Linseed oil can contain toxic additives, so it’s best to avoid it. A wide variety of borate-based “washes” exist that are safer to use near food plants. factsheet Building Raised Beds (continued) Determining Raised Bed Depth 6 - 10 inches: basil, beet, carrot short, chervil, chives, cilantro, lettuce, onion, greens, parsley, radish, Make your raised beds deep enough for healthy roots. peppermint, spinach, thyme, dwarf cherry tomato, Plants will be stunted and not produce well if their roots watercress, oregano, sage, marjoram. can’t reach down far enough into soil. If the raised bed is 10 - 15 inches: carrot, celery, cabbage, garlic, chard, built shallowly, the roots will venture into the ground below leek, lettuce, mustard, oregano, potato, strawberry, unless it is too compacted. A floor or barrier is needed if dwarf patio tomato. you don’t want roots growing into contaminated soil. The 15 - 18 inches: beans, collards, cucumber, kale, pea, recommended soil depths at right are taken directly from pepper, squash, short vine tomato. Golden Gate Gardening by Pam Peirce. 18 - 24 inches: broccoli, brussel sprouts, cabbage, corn, cauliflower, tomato. Common Materials for Raised Beds MATERIAL ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICITY/ DURABILITY COST NOTES IMPACT LEACHING Soil/straw mound Very low None Low Free to low Explore permaculture methods. Urbanite (broken Salvaged material See note High Free to low Concrete less than one year old concrete pieces) has low impact. can leach lime, affecting soil pH. Brick or Low if reused, See note High Low when Lining the bed can prevent lime cinderblock Medium if new. reused from entering the soil. Wood logs Low if scrap None Medium to Free to low high Bamboo Especially low None Medium Moderate when grown domestically Metal siding Low if reused Low Medium to Low to high Line with fabric to delay rusting. high Naturally treated Low Low Medium to Moderate Use nontoxic sealant on untreated reuse wood high wood (Flaxseed oil or wax) Plywood, High if new. Very high Medium Moderate Avoid. Contains toxic pressboard, and Lower if reused. components. painted woods Pressure treated High Can be high High High See section on pressure treated wood wood. Redwood or High, or lower if Low High High cedar (new) FSC certified. Stone (new) Can be very high Low High High Plastic lumber Medium ( does Moderate High High HDPE and LPE are best plastic not decompose or choices. recycle) Railroad ties Hazardous Very high High Moderate Avoid due to toxic creosote. Recommended Books, Websites, and Resources The Essential Urban Farmer – descriptions of building with Washington Toxics Coalition – tips on growing food at urbanite, brick, stone, corrugated steel, and wood. home in a way that avoids toxics. watoxics.org The Vegetable Gardener’s Book of Building Projects – Healthy Building Network – arsenic wood hazards and plans and building instructions for wooden raised beds. alternatives. www.healthybuilding.net/arsenic/hbn_ Berkeley Tool Lending Library – building and gardening wood_factsheet.html tools available for those with a Berkeley library card. Ecology Center EcoDirectory – salvage yards, soil and compost sources. www.ecologycenter.org/directory Please consider supporting the Ecology Center’s free educational resources at www.ecologycenter.org/donate. 2530 San Pablo Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94702 | 510.548.2220 x 233 [email protected] | www.ecologycenter.org Printed on 100% post-consumer recycled paper.
Recommended publications
  • Effect of Wood Preservative Treatment of Beehives on Honey Bees Ad Hive Products
    1176 J. Agric. Food Chem. 1984. 32, 1176-1180 Effect of Wood Preservative Treatment of Beehives on Honey Bees and Hive Products Martins A. Kalnins* and Benjamin F. Detroy Effects of wood preservatives on the microenvironment in treated beehives were assessed by measuring performance of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies and levels of preservative residues in bees, honey, and beeswax. Five hives were used for each preservative treatment: copper naphthenate, copper 8-quinolinolate, pentachlorophenol (PCP), chromated copper arsenate (CCA), acid copper chromate (ACC), tributyltin oxide (TBTO), Forest Products Laboratory water repellent, and no treatment (control). Honey, beeswax, and honey bees were sampled periodically during two successive summers. Elevated levels of PCP and tin were found in bees and beeswax from hives treated with those preservatives. A detectable rise in copper content of honey was found in samples from hives treated with copper na- phthenate. CCA treatment resulted in an increased arsenic content of bees from those hives. CCA, TBTO, and PCP treatments of beehives were associated with winter losses of colonies. Each year in the United States, about 4.1 million colo- honey. Harmful effect of arsenic compounds on bees was nies of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) produce approxi- linked to orchard sprays and emissions from smelters in mately 225 million pounds of honey and 3.4 million pounds a Utah study by Knowlton et al. (1947). An average of of beeswax. This represents an annual income of about approximately 0.1 µg of arsenic trioxide/dead bee was $140 million; the agricultural economy receives an addi- reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Creosote Supply and Quality by Richard Harris, Koppers Industries
    Trends in Creosote Supply and Quality by Richard Harris, Koppers Industries Introduction This paper examines the ten-year outlook for wood-preserving creosotes in North America. The major factors determining creosote availability and quality in the future will be the quantity of coal tar produced in the United States, and the economics of the competing uses for coal tar distillates. Major Uses of Coal Tar Distillates Though no two tar plants are exactly alike, in general we may say that two distillate streams are initially generated during the production of coal tar pitch (see chart). The first distillate off, representing 20 percent of the tar, is generally known as chemical oil. It is the fighter fraction, containing from 40 to 55 percent naphthalene. The second, heavier distillate is the creosote fraction used to make wood preservative and carbon black. It accounts for 30 percent of the crude tar. The remainder, about half of the tar is carbon pitch for the aluminum and graphite industries. This is the product which drives the domestic tar distillation business. Each distillate may then be processed to create value-added products. Solvent from which resins are made, naphthalene for plastics and pesticides, and "correction oil" for use in wood-preserving creosote are all derived from the chemical oil. In North America, most of the creosote fraction produced is combined with correction oil, or in some instances unprocessed chemical oil, to make AWPA-specification creosotes. The heavy distillate left over after wood preserving needs are met is sold as carbon black feedstock. In the rest of the world, this fraction is mostly used for the production of carbon black and anthracene oil.
    [Show full text]
  • Longleaf Pine: an Annotated Bibliography, 1946 Through 1967
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Research Paper SO-35 longleaf pine: an annotated bibliography, 1946 through 1967 Thomas C. Croker, Jr. SOUTHERN FOREST EXPERIMENT STATION T.C. Nelson, Director FOREST SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 1968 Croker, Thomas C., Jr. 1968. Longleaf pine: an annotated bibliography, 1946 through 1967. Southern Forest Exp. Sta., New Orleans, Louisiana. 52 pp. (U. S. Dep. Agr. Forest Serv. Res. Pap. SO-35) Lists 665 publications appearing since W. G. Wahlenberg compiled the bibliography for his book, Longleaf Pine. Contents Page Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Factors of the environment. Biology........................................................................................ 2 11 Site factors, climate, situation, soil ............................................................................. 2 15 Animal ecology. Game management .......................................................................... 2 16 General botany ............................................................................................................. 2 17 Systematic botany ....................................................................................................... 6 18 Plant ecology................................................................................................................. 7 2. Silviculture...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Farm Forestry in Mississippi
    Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Bulletins Experiment Station (MAFES) 6-1-1946 Farm forestry in Mississippi Mississippi State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/mafes-bulletins Recommended Citation Mississippi State University, "Farm forestry in Mississippi" (1946). Bulletins. 410. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/mafes-bulletins/410 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station (MAFES) at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletins by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BULLETIN 432 JUNE, 1946 FARM FORESTRY IN MISSISSIPPI mm Complied by D. W. Skelton, Coordinator Researcli Informa- tion jointly representing Mississippi State Vocational Board and : Mississippi Agricultural Experiment Station MISSISSIPPI STATE COLLEGE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION CLARENCE DORMAN, Director STATE COLLEGE MISSISSIPPI ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Acknowledgments are made to Mr. Monty Payne, Head, Depart- ment of Forestry, Mississippi State College, School of Agriculture and Experiment Station, and his staff, Mr. R. T. ClaDp. Mr. E. G. Roberts, Mr. G. W. Abel, and Mr. W. C. Hopkins, for checking the technical content and assisting in the organization of this bulletin; to Mr. V. G. Martin, Head, Agricultural Education Department, State Corege, Mississippi, for his suggestions and assistance in the or- ganization of this bulletin ; to forest industries of Mississippi ; Ex- tension Service, State College, Mississippi ; Texas Forest Service, College Station, Texas ; United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. ; and Mr. Monty Payne, State College, Mississippi, for photographs used in this bulletin and to all others who made contributions in any way to this bulletin.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatiotemporal Variability of Plant Phenology
    University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2016-01-01 Spatiotemporal Variability Of Plant Phenology In Drylands: A Case Study From The orN thern Chihuahuan Desert Naomi Robin Luna University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Luna, Naomi Robin, "Spatiotemporal Variability Of Plant Phenology In Drylands: A Case Study From The orN thern Chihuahuan Desert" (2016). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 684. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/684 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPATIOTEMPORAL VARIABILITY OF PLANT PHENOLOGY IN DRYLANDS: A CASE STUDY FROM THE NORTHERN CHIHUAHUAN DESERT Naomi Robin Luna, B.Sc. Master’s Program in Environmental Science APPROVED: __________________________________________ Craig E. Tweedie, Ph.D. __________________________________________ Dawn Browning, Ph.D. __________________________________________ Jennie McLaren, Ph.D. _______________________________________ Charles Ambler, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Naomi Robin Luna 2016 SPATIOTEMPORAL VARIABILITY OF PLANT PHENOLOGY IN DRYLANDS: A CASE STUDY FROM THE NORTHERN CHIHUAHUAN DESERT By NAOMI ROBIN LUNA, B.Sc. THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Environmental Science Program THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO December 2016 Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisors Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Creosote Hazardous Substances Database Info
    The information below is copied verbatim from the National Library of Medicine Hazardous Substance Data Bank. This is public information available from http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search/f?./temp/~1o22bT:2 For other data, click on the Table of Contents Best Sections Non-Human Toxicity Excerpts : Chronic toxicity studies in mice with beechwood creosote caused some animal deaths (bronchopneumonia with pulmonary abscess), but showed no dose-lethal effect relation. The spleen of the male mice showed a wt decr. The creosote caused no significant histopathological changes in the organs and tissues. Deviations in the hematological and clin indicators were within physiological deviations. The beechwood creosote was not carcinogenic. [Miyazato T et al; Oyo Yakuri 28 (5): 909-24 (1984)] **PEER REVIEWED** Probable Routes of Human Exposure : Cancer incidence was studied among 922 creosote exposed impregnators at 13 plants in Sweden and Norway. The subjects had been impregnating wood (eg, railroad cross-ties and telegraph poles), but no data on individual exposures were available. The study population was restricted to men employed during the period 1950-1975, and their cancer morbidity was checked through the cancer registries. The total cancer incidence was somewhat lower than expected, 129 cases versus 137 expected (standardize incidence ratio 0.94). Increased risks in both countries combined were observed for lip cancer (standardised incidence ratio 2.50, 95% confidence interval (95% confidence interval) 0.81-5.83), skin cancer (standardised incidence ratio 2.37, 95% confidence interval 1.08-4.50), and malignant lymphoma (standardised incidence ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 0.83-3.78).
    [Show full text]
  • A Art of Essential Oils
    The Essence’s of Perfume Materials Glen O. Brechbill FRAGRANCE BOOKS INC. www.perfumerbook.com New Jersey - USA 2009 Fragrance Books Inc. @www.perfumerbook.com GLEN O. BRECHBILL “To my parents & brothers family whose faith in my work & abilities made this manuscript possible” II THE ESSENCES OF PERFUME MATERIALS © This book is a work of non-fiction. No part of the book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the author except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Please note the enclosed book is based on The Art of Fragrance Ingredients ©. Designed by Glen O. Brechbill Library of Congress Brechbill, Glen O. The Essence’s of Perfume Materials / Glen O. Brechbill P. cm. 477 pgs. 1. Fragrance Ingredients Non Fiction. 2. Written odor descriptions to facillitate the understanding of the olfactory language. 1. Essential Oils. 2. Aromas. 3. Chemicals. 4. Classification. 5. Source. 6. Art. 7. Thousand’s of fragrances. 8. Science. 9. Creativity. I. Title. Certificate Registry # 1 - 164126868 Copyright © 2009 by Glen O. Brechbill All Rights Reserved PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 First Edition Fragrance Books Inc. @www.perfumerbook.com THE ESSENCE’S OF PERFUME MATERIALS III My book displays the very best of essential oils. It offers a rich palette of natural ingredients and essences. At its fullest it expresses a passion for the art of perfume. With one hundred seventy-seven listings it condenses a great deal of pertinent information in a single text.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Contribution Analysis of Sc’S Forestry Sector, 2017
    ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION ANALYSIS OF SC’S FORESTRY SECTOR, 2017 1 Economic Contribution Analysis of South Carolina’s Forestry Sector, 2017 Puskar N. Khanal, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Forestry and Environmental Conservation 250 Lehotsky Hall Clemson University Clemson, SC 29634 [email protected] Thomas J. Straka, Ph.D. Professor Department of Forestry and Environmental Conservation 123 Lehotsky Hall Clemson University Clemson, SC 29634 [email protected] David B. Willis, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Agricultural Sciences Clemson University 239 McAdams Hall Clemson, SC 29634 [email protected] Abstract South Carolina’s forests are one of the foundations of the state’s economy and define its natural resource environment. They represent the dominant landscape of the state, and support many important manufacturing industries. Forests are renewable resources that contribute to the growth of the state, while providing its citizens desirable aesthetic, recreational, wildlife, water quality, and other environmental values. The SC Forestry Commission initiated the 20/15 Project in cooperation with the Forestry Association of South Carolina and other partners to grow forestry’s economic impact from $17.4 billion to $20 billion by 2015. Forests contribute over $21 billion annually to South Carolina’s economy and provide employment to over 84,000 of its citizens. South Carolina Forestry Commission Columbia, S.C. April 2017 1 South Carolina’s Forests Early settlers wrote of luxuriant forests covering most of the state. They relied on the forests for food and shelter. Many of the state’s earliest industries were based on forest products. From the late seventeen to early eighteenth centuries, the Upstate had an early ironmaking industry that was fueled by charcoal produced from thousands of acres of forestland (Ferguson and Cowan 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Creosote
    Trusted by the Trade & Professionals for over 140 Years Manufactured in the UK TDS Technical Data Sheet Traditional Creosote DESCRIPTION Barrettine Traditional Creosote is a complex hydrocarbon-based wood preservative product derived from the distillation of Coal Tar. The product imparts a mid to dark brown stain to many exterior timbers as well as providing excellent protection from fungal growth and wood damaging insects. FOR USE IN INDUSTRIAL INSTALLATIONS OR PROFESSIONAL TREATMENT ONLY. STRICTLY FOR EXTERIOR USE ONLY. Creosote is strictly controlled by environmental standards and as such its composition cannot be changed or modified in any way. PRINCIPLE USE USE RESTRICTIONS FOR CREOSOTE: PT08, wood preservative in preventative treatment, outdoor use, classes 3 & 4. Superficial treatment of wood used as railway sleepers and fence panels/horizontals used in the safety critical uses of highways fencing, equestrian fencing, and animal security fencing in Use Class 3 (situation in which wood is not covered and not in contact with the ground. It is either continually exposed to weather or is protected from the weather but subject to frequent wetting). Superficial treatment of wood in Use Class 4a (situation in which the wood is in contact with the ground and thus is permanently exposed to wetting). To be used on; • Overhead electricity poles • Telecommunication poles; • Fencing posts for the safety critical uses of highways fencing, equestrian fencing, and animal security fencing; • Agricultural tree stakes/supports (fruit, vineyard, and hops) only when a long service life (safety critical) is required. Treatment of creosote impregnated wood (UC 3 and UC 4a) after modifications such as sawing, cutting, shaping, and machining.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conquest of Pus -- a History of Bitumen, Creosote and Carbolic Acid
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics Faculty Publications Genetics 9-5-2018 The onquesC t of Pus -- A History of Bitumen, Creosote and Carbolic Acid Charles T. Ambrose University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits oy u. Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/microbio_facpub Part of the Medical Immunology Commons, and the Medical Microbiology Commons Repository Citation Ambrose, Charles T., "The onqueC st of Pus -- A History of Bitumen, Creosote and Carbolic Acid" (2018). Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics Faculty Publications. 108. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/microbio_facpub/108 This Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Conquest of Pus -- A History of Bitumen, Creosote and Carbolic Acid Notes/Citation Information Published in Journal of Infectious Diseases & Preventive Medicine, v. 6, Issue 2, 1000179, p. 1-8. © 2018 Ambrose CT. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Digital Object Identifier (DOI) https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-8731.1000179 This review is available at UKnowledge: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/microbio_facpub/108 eases Dis & s P u re io v t e Journal of Infectious Diseases & c n e t f i v n I e f M Ambrose, J Infect Dis Preve Med 2018, 6:2 o e l d a i n ISSN: 2329-8731 c Preventive Medicine DOI: 10.4172/2329-8731.1000179 r i u n o e J Review article Open Access The Conquest of Pus -- a History of Bitumen, Creosote and Carbolic Acid Charles T.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Tar Creosote
    This report contains the collective views of an international group of experts and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organization, or the World Health Organization. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 62 COAL TAR CREOSOTE Please note that the layout and pagination of this pdf file are not identical to the document being printed First draft prepared by Drs Christine Melber, Janet Kielhorn, and Inge Mangelsdorf, Fraunhofer Institute of Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Hanover, Germany Published under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organization, and the World Health Organization, and produced within the framework of the Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals. World Health Organization Geneva, 2004 The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS), established in 1980, is a joint venture of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the International Labour Organization (ILO), and the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the IPCS are to establish the scientific basis for assessment of the risk to human health and the environment from exposure to chemicals, through international peer review processes, as a prerequisite for the promotion of chemical safety, and to provide technical assistance in strengthening national capacities for the sound management of chemicals. The Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC) was established in 1995 by UNEP, ILO, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, WHO, the United Nations Industrial Development Organization, the United Nations Institute for Training and Research, and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (Participating Organizations), following recommendations made by the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development to strengthen cooperation and increase coordination in the field of chemical safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Tar, Wood Tar Oils, Wood Creosote, Wood Naphtha 3807 Fifth
    38.07 38.07 - Wood tar; wood tar oils; wood creosote; wood naphtha; vegetable pitch; brewers’ pitch and similar preparations based on rosin, resin acids or on vegetable pitch. This heading covers products of complex composition obtained during the distillation (or carbonisation) of resinous or non-resinous wood. Apart from gases, these processes give pyroligneous liquids, wood tar and wood charcoal in proportions varying according to the nature of the wood employed and the speed of the operation. Pyroligneous liquids (sometimes known as raw pyroligneous acid), which are not materials of international commerce, contain acetic acid, methanol, acetone, a little furfuraldehyde and allyl alcohol. This heading also covers vegetable pitch of all kinds, brewers’ pitch and similar compounds based on rosin, resin acids or on vegetable pitch. The products classified here are : (A) Wood tar; wood tar oils whether or not decreosoted and wood creosote. (1) Wood tar is obtained by draining from wood (coniferous or other) during carbonisation in charcoal kilns (e.g., Swedish tar or Stockholm tar), or by distillation in retorts or ovens (distilled tars). The latter are obtained directly as a fraction settling out from the pyroligneous liquids (settled tars), or by distillation of the pyroligneous liquids - in which they have been partially dissolved (dissolved tars). Partially distilled tars from which some of the volatile oils have been removed by further distillation are also classified in this heading. All these tars are complex mixtures of hydrocarbons, phenols or their homologues, furfuraldehyde, acetic acid and various other products. Tars obtained from resinous woods, which differ from those obtained from non-resinous woods in that they also contain products resulting from the distillation of the resin (terpenes, rosin oils, etc.), are viscous products ranging in colour from brownish-orange to brown.
    [Show full text]