Notes on Creosote Lac Scale Insect Resin As a Mastic and Sealant In
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California -
Effect of Wood Preservative Treatment of Beehives on Honey Bees Ad Hive Products
1176 J. Agric. Food Chem. 1984. 32, 1176-1180 Effect of Wood Preservative Treatment of Beehives on Honey Bees and Hive Products Martins A. Kalnins* and Benjamin F. Detroy Effects of wood preservatives on the microenvironment in treated beehives were assessed by measuring performance of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies and levels of preservative residues in bees, honey, and beeswax. Five hives were used for each preservative treatment: copper naphthenate, copper 8-quinolinolate, pentachlorophenol (PCP), chromated copper arsenate (CCA), acid copper chromate (ACC), tributyltin oxide (TBTO), Forest Products Laboratory water repellent, and no treatment (control). Honey, beeswax, and honey bees were sampled periodically during two successive summers. Elevated levels of PCP and tin were found in bees and beeswax from hives treated with those preservatives. A detectable rise in copper content of honey was found in samples from hives treated with copper na- phthenate. CCA treatment resulted in an increased arsenic content of bees from those hives. CCA, TBTO, and PCP treatments of beehives were associated with winter losses of colonies. Each year in the United States, about 4.1 million colo- honey. Harmful effect of arsenic compounds on bees was nies of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) produce approxi- linked to orchard sprays and emissions from smelters in mately 225 million pounds of honey and 3.4 million pounds a Utah study by Knowlton et al. (1947). An average of of beeswax. This represents an annual income of about approximately 0.1 µg of arsenic trioxide/dead bee was $140 million; the agricultural economy receives an addi- reported. -
Issue 5 Spring 2015
Utah Shrubland Management Issue 5, Spring 2015 Page 1 The Spring 2015 Project Updates and Field Tour Information Newsletter highlights The field crew members on the Shrub Management Project are now preparing for our study site in Park their third summer of data collection after management actions were initiated in spring of 2013. It’s an exciting year to see the effects of herbicide, mowing,Page and 1 seed- Valley, UT. The ranch ing treatments on a diverse group of shrub, grass, and forb species. With two study where we work is sites per ranch, we can begin to compare how response to management varies be- tween closely related ecological sites. owned and operated The big news this season is that over the next two months, we’re hosting tours of our by Lance West- field sites to share our initial project results. All who are interested in rangelands— moreland and family; management practitioners, property owners, students, neighbors—are invited to come learn about the Utah shrub management project. Ecologists from USDA-ARS greasewood is the and Utah State University will be leading discussions about brush management meth- targeted shrub. ods and ecological sites at our four study locations (details below). The tours will also include presentations by state and county conser- vation agencies (DWR, NRCS, Utah State Extension) on topics such as exotic species control, juniper encroachment, seeding, and wildfire management. Lunches will be provided for tour attendees. This will be a great opportunity to learn about current approaches in range management, come join us! Photo: Beth Burritt CONTENTS 2015 Summer Field Tour Schedule Project Birdseye & Cedar Fort (Central UT) - See enclosed flyer May 20 1 Updates Targeted Shrubs: Rubber Rabbitbrush & Snakeweed Park Valley ranch: Partners: NRCS, DWR, UACD Zone 3 Overview of 2 Time: 9am — 4pm ecological sites Park Valley (North-Western UT) - See enclosed flyer June 2 Greasewood: Targeted Shrub: Black Greasewood Natural history 5 Partners: West Box Elder Coord. -
Trends in Creosote Supply and Quality by Richard Harris, Koppers Industries
Trends in Creosote Supply and Quality by Richard Harris, Koppers Industries Introduction This paper examines the ten-year outlook for wood-preserving creosotes in North America. The major factors determining creosote availability and quality in the future will be the quantity of coal tar produced in the United States, and the economics of the competing uses for coal tar distillates. Major Uses of Coal Tar Distillates Though no two tar plants are exactly alike, in general we may say that two distillate streams are initially generated during the production of coal tar pitch (see chart). The first distillate off, representing 20 percent of the tar, is generally known as chemical oil. It is the fighter fraction, containing from 40 to 55 percent naphthalene. The second, heavier distillate is the creosote fraction used to make wood preservative and carbon black. It accounts for 30 percent of the crude tar. The remainder, about half of the tar is carbon pitch for the aluminum and graphite industries. This is the product which drives the domestic tar distillation business. Each distillate may then be processed to create value-added products. Solvent from which resins are made, naphthalene for plastics and pesticides, and "correction oil" for use in wood-preserving creosote are all derived from the chemical oil. In North America, most of the creosote fraction produced is combined with correction oil, or in some instances unprocessed chemical oil, to make AWPA-specification creosotes. The heavy distillate left over after wood preserving needs are met is sold as carbon black feedstock. In the rest of the world, this fraction is mostly used for the production of carbon black and anthracene oil. -
Phreatophytes
Phreatophytes By T. W. ROBINSON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1423 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1958 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. Price 40 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract ................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................ 2 Acknowledgments ......................................... 2 Use of ground water by phreatophytes ..................... 3 Evidence ............................................... 3 Effect .................................................. 3 Future considerations ..................................... 7 Definitions ................................................. 9 The hydrologic cycle ........................................ 10 Plants classified as phreatophytes ............................ 12 Scientific and common names .............................. 13 Factors affecting occurrence of phreatophytes ................ 13 Climate .................................................. 14 Depth to water ........................................... 14 Quality of ground water .................................. 15 Factors affecting the use of ground water by phreatophytes...... 16 Climatic conditions ....................................... 17 Depth to water ........................................... 22 Density of growth ....................................... -
Longleaf Pine: an Annotated Bibliography, 1946 Through 1967
U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Research Paper SO-35 longleaf pine: an annotated bibliography, 1946 through 1967 Thomas C. Croker, Jr. SOUTHERN FOREST EXPERIMENT STATION T.C. Nelson, Director FOREST SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 1968 Croker, Thomas C., Jr. 1968. Longleaf pine: an annotated bibliography, 1946 through 1967. Southern Forest Exp. Sta., New Orleans, Louisiana. 52 pp. (U. S. Dep. Agr. Forest Serv. Res. Pap. SO-35) Lists 665 publications appearing since W. G. Wahlenberg compiled the bibliography for his book, Longleaf Pine. Contents Page Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Factors of the environment. Biology........................................................................................ 2 11 Site factors, climate, situation, soil ............................................................................. 2 15 Animal ecology. Game management .......................................................................... 2 16 General botany ............................................................................................................. 2 17 Systematic botany ....................................................................................................... 6 18 Plant ecology................................................................................................................. 7 2. Silviculture............................................................................................................................... -
Farm Forestry in Mississippi
Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Bulletins Experiment Station (MAFES) 6-1-1946 Farm forestry in Mississippi Mississippi State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/mafes-bulletins Recommended Citation Mississippi State University, "Farm forestry in Mississippi" (1946). Bulletins. 410. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/mafes-bulletins/410 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station (MAFES) at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletins by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BULLETIN 432 JUNE, 1946 FARM FORESTRY IN MISSISSIPPI mm Complied by D. W. Skelton, Coordinator Researcli Informa- tion jointly representing Mississippi State Vocational Board and : Mississippi Agricultural Experiment Station MISSISSIPPI STATE COLLEGE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION CLARENCE DORMAN, Director STATE COLLEGE MISSISSIPPI ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Acknowledgments are made to Mr. Monty Payne, Head, Depart- ment of Forestry, Mississippi State College, School of Agriculture and Experiment Station, and his staff, Mr. R. T. ClaDp. Mr. E. G. Roberts, Mr. G. W. Abel, and Mr. W. C. Hopkins, for checking the technical content and assisting in the organization of this bulletin; to Mr. V. G. Martin, Head, Agricultural Education Department, State Corege, Mississippi, for his suggestions and assistance in the or- ganization of this bulletin ; to forest industries of Mississippi ; Ex- tension Service, State College, Mississippi ; Texas Forest Service, College Station, Texas ; United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. ; and Mr. Monty Payne, State College, Mississippi, for photographs used in this bulletin and to all others who made contributions in any way to this bulletin. -
Spatiotemporal Variability of Plant Phenology
University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2016-01-01 Spatiotemporal Variability Of Plant Phenology In Drylands: A Case Study From The orN thern Chihuahuan Desert Naomi Robin Luna University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Luna, Naomi Robin, "Spatiotemporal Variability Of Plant Phenology In Drylands: A Case Study From The orN thern Chihuahuan Desert" (2016). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 684. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/684 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPATIOTEMPORAL VARIABILITY OF PLANT PHENOLOGY IN DRYLANDS: A CASE STUDY FROM THE NORTHERN CHIHUAHUAN DESERT Naomi Robin Luna, B.Sc. Master’s Program in Environmental Science APPROVED: __________________________________________ Craig E. Tweedie, Ph.D. __________________________________________ Dawn Browning, Ph.D. __________________________________________ Jennie McLaren, Ph.D. _______________________________________ Charles Ambler, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Naomi Robin Luna 2016 SPATIOTEMPORAL VARIABILITY OF PLANT PHENOLOGY IN DRYLANDS: A CASE STUDY FROM THE NORTHERN CHIHUAHUAN DESERT By NAOMI ROBIN LUNA, B.Sc. THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Environmental Science Program THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO December 2016 Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisors Dr. -
Creosote Hazardous Substances Database Info
The information below is copied verbatim from the National Library of Medicine Hazardous Substance Data Bank. This is public information available from http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search/f?./temp/~1o22bT:2 For other data, click on the Table of Contents Best Sections Non-Human Toxicity Excerpts : Chronic toxicity studies in mice with beechwood creosote caused some animal deaths (bronchopneumonia with pulmonary abscess), but showed no dose-lethal effect relation. The spleen of the male mice showed a wt decr. The creosote caused no significant histopathological changes in the organs and tissues. Deviations in the hematological and clin indicators were within physiological deviations. The beechwood creosote was not carcinogenic. [Miyazato T et al; Oyo Yakuri 28 (5): 909-24 (1984)] **PEER REVIEWED** Probable Routes of Human Exposure : Cancer incidence was studied among 922 creosote exposed impregnators at 13 plants in Sweden and Norway. The subjects had been impregnating wood (eg, railroad cross-ties and telegraph poles), but no data on individual exposures were available. The study population was restricted to men employed during the period 1950-1975, and their cancer morbidity was checked through the cancer registries. The total cancer incidence was somewhat lower than expected, 129 cases versus 137 expected (standardize incidence ratio 0.94). Increased risks in both countries combined were observed for lip cancer (standardised incidence ratio 2.50, 95% confidence interval (95% confidence interval) 0.81-5.83), skin cancer (standardised incidence ratio 2.37, 95% confidence interval 1.08-4.50), and malignant lymphoma (standardised incidence ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 0.83-3.78). -
A Art of Essential Oils
The Essence’s of Perfume Materials Glen O. Brechbill FRAGRANCE BOOKS INC. www.perfumerbook.com New Jersey - USA 2009 Fragrance Books Inc. @www.perfumerbook.com GLEN O. BRECHBILL “To my parents & brothers family whose faith in my work & abilities made this manuscript possible” II THE ESSENCES OF PERFUME MATERIALS © This book is a work of non-fiction. No part of the book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the author except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Please note the enclosed book is based on The Art of Fragrance Ingredients ©. Designed by Glen O. Brechbill Library of Congress Brechbill, Glen O. The Essence’s of Perfume Materials / Glen O. Brechbill P. cm. 477 pgs. 1. Fragrance Ingredients Non Fiction. 2. Written odor descriptions to facillitate the understanding of the olfactory language. 1. Essential Oils. 2. Aromas. 3. Chemicals. 4. Classification. 5. Source. 6. Art. 7. Thousand’s of fragrances. 8. Science. 9. Creativity. I. Title. Certificate Registry # 1 - 164126868 Copyright © 2009 by Glen O. Brechbill All Rights Reserved PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 First Edition Fragrance Books Inc. @www.perfumerbook.com THE ESSENCE’S OF PERFUME MATERIALS III My book displays the very best of essential oils. It offers a rich palette of natural ingredients and essences. At its fullest it expresses a passion for the art of perfume. With one hundred seventy-seven listings it condenses a great deal of pertinent information in a single text. -
Managing Intermountain Rangelands
This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. TREATMENT OF INLAND SALTGRASS AND GREASEWOOD SITES TO IMPROVE FORAGE PRODUCTION Bruce A. Roundy, Greg J. Cluff, James A. Young, and R. A. Evans ABSTRACT: Greasewood and saltgrass sites that Greasewood and saltgrass dominated plant once supported basin wildrye can be highly communities generally occur in these lowland productive after chemical brush control and floodplains and basins below the upper and forage restoration by proper management or by higher precipitation sagebrush zone that seeding. Application of 2,4-D in June, once or Billings (1945) considered edaphic climates for 2 consecutive years, effectively controls within the drier shadscale zone. These sites greasewood and salt rabbitbrush. Associated are characterized by low precipitation of 5 to saline soils can be successfully seeded to 10 inches (12 to 25 em) annually, saline and salt-tolerant grasses such as basin wildrye and fine textured soils, a shallow wa~er table and tall wheatgrass by using irrigation or on sites in some areas, seasonal flooding. Plant growth where salinity is low and in years when spring and distribution are affected by total soil precipitation is high. salinity, concentrations of specific ions, and depth of soil salts, soil areation, and depth SITE DESCRIPTION AND POTENTIAL of the watertable and salinity of ground water, total soil water potential as affected by salts The decisions of how to manage or treat a (soil osmotic potential) and water content specific site to increase forage production are (soil matric potential) and the seasonal most dependent upon the site potential and variability of these factors. -
Sarcobatus Vermiculatus Greasewood
Sarcobatus vermiculatus Greasewood by Kathy Lloyd and Carole Mackin Montana Native Plant Society Photo: Drake Barton Sarcobatus vermiculatus (Greasewood) if that was the case the specimen was lost with all the others that were left near the Great Falls of the reasewood, Sarcobatus vermiculatus, Missouri in the White Bear Island cache. Grease- was collected on July 20, 1806 by Cap- wood is mentioned again in Lewis’s journal on Au- Gtain Meriwether Lewis as his small party, separated gust 5, 1805 when he talks about traveling “down from Captain Clark, explored the Marias River the bottom through thick brush of the pulppy leafed drainage south of present-day Shelby. Lewis previ- thorn and prickly pears…” Undoubtedly, Captain ously described the species in his journal on May 11, Lewis saw greasewood in many settings before he 1805 as the explorers traveled up the Missouri River collected the plant on July 20 in the Marias River in what is now Valley County. He provided a de- bottom. Just days after collecting the greasewood tailed description of the plant, “there is another specimen, Lewis’s party met Blackfoot warriors who growth that begins now to make it’s appearance in encouraged them not to linger. The greasewood the bottom lands and is becoming extremely trouble- sample must have been safely stowed to survive the some; it is a shrub which rises to the hight of from marathon run back to the Missouri River. two to four feet, much branched, the bark of the The greasewood specimen collected by Lewis can trunk somewhat rough hard and of light grey colour; be seen today in the Lewis & Clark Herbarium in the wood is firm and stif, the branches beset with a Philadelphia.