DOCSLIB.ORG

Farm Forestry in Mississippi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Farm Forestry in Mississippi Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Bulletins Experiment Station (MAFES) 6-1-1946 Farm forestry in Mississippi Mississippi State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/mafes-bulletins Recommended Citation Mississippi State University, "Farm forestry in Mississippi" (1946). Bulletins. 410. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/mafes-bulletins/410 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station (MAFES) at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletins by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BULLETIN 432 JUNE, 1946 FARM FORESTRY IN MISSISSIPPI mm Complied by D. W. Skelton, Coordinator Researcli Informa- tion jointly representing Mississippi State Vocational Board and : Mississippi Agricultural Experiment Station MISSISSIPPI STATE COLLEGE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION CLARENCE DORMAN, Director STATE COLLEGE MISSISSIPPI ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Acknowledgments are made to Mr. Monty Payne, Head, Depart- ment of Forestry, Mississippi State College, School of Agriculture and Experiment Station, and his staff, Mr. R. T. ClaDp. Mr. E. G. Roberts, Mr. G. W. Abel, and Mr. W. C. Hopkins, for checking the technical content and assisting in the organization of this bulletin; to Mr. V. G. Martin, Head, Agricultural Education Department, State Corege, Mississippi, for his suggestions and assistance in the or- ganization of this bulletin ; to forest industries of Mississippi ; Ex- tension Service, State College, Mississippi ; Texas Forest Service, College Station, Texas ; United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. ; and Mr. Monty Payne, State College, Mississippi, for photographs used in this bulletin and to all others who made contributions in any way to this bulletin. CONTENTS I Pages Introduction 6 PART I Forest economy of Mississippi 7-10 Economic importance 7 Timber a major source of income to the railroad Timber contributes to support of many other business enterprises 7 Timber as a taxpayer 7 Employment 9 PART II Kinds of trees in Mississippi 10-12 Conifers (needle-like) 10 Hardwoods 10 PART III Some principles of farm woodland management 13 Improvement cuttings 13 Liberation cuttings . 13 Thinning 15 Pruning 20 Harvest cutting methods 21 Selective cutting 22 Individual tree selection 22 Group selection method 28 Seed tree method 29 Clear cutting method 30 Natural reproduction 31 Artificial reproduction 33 PART IV Hardwood timber 44-50 Results of research 45 Growth rates 45 Comparison of increment and drain 45 Improvement cuttings 46 Setting up cuttings standards 46 Cutting rules 47 Cottonwood planting 48 PART V Naval stores production 51-61 Longleaf and slash pines—gum producers 51 Selecting turpentine farming as a business 51 Yields of crude gum 53 CONTENTS (Continued) Pages Turpentine orchards compared with natural stands 53 Summarized statements and conclusions on turpentining practice . 54 The use of chemical stimulus to increase gum yields 60 Turpentine stills 61 PART VI ] Preservative treatment of farm timber __LiLii::i :i 62-66 Requirements of preservatives ^ 62 Pentachlorophenol cold soaking treatment for fence posts 63-66 PART VII Marketing and utilization of farm timbers-i 67-101 Markets 67 Sav^logs 67 Pulpwood 67 Pulp and board mills 67 Poles, piling, and crossties 69 Specialty products 71 Selling timbei' on a grade basis, also delivered prices vs. farm prices 72 Piling and poles 73 Lumber 75 Crossties 75 Pulpwood . - 77 Comparison of volume and value of various size logs and trees 80 Estimating and selling timber 84-94 Estimating timber 85 Selling timber 94 Utilization of timber on the farm 94-101 Wood fuel 95 Farm buildings 96 Lumber 97 Logs and poles 99 Charcoal 100 PART VIII Forest protection 101-121 Protection from and control of fires 101 Loss and injury caused by woods fires 101 Causes of woods fires 104 Prevention of woods fires 104 Reducing fire hazards 105 Organized woods or forest-fire protection 106 Community fire protection 107 Fighting woods fires 107 CONTENTS (Continued) Pages Fire fighting equipment 108 Mopping-up 109 Pointers in fighting fires 109 Protection of forest from cattle grazing 111 Grazing cattle on longleaf pine forests 111 Cattle grazing in loblolly-shortleaf pine and hardwood forest 114 Grazing hardwoods 114 Grazing loblolly pine 114 Damage from grazing hogs in the longleaf pine area 116 Damage to longleaf pine by grazing of sheep and goats 117 Insects and diseases 118 Insects 118 Diseases 120 6 MISSISSIPPI AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION BULLETIN 432 INTRODUCTION Forests are one of Mississippi's most important natural re- sources. About 54 percent of the land in the State or 16-1/2 million acres are devoted to forests. About 14 percent of the annual income in Mississippi is derived from forest products. Forests and related activities also contribute approximately 13.3 percent of the tax paid into the State Treasury. It is estimated that the average annual in- come from farm woodlands alone amounted to $16,890,000 during the period from 1941 to 1944. However, there are a great many farm forestry problems and thus a dire need for better woodland manage- ment throughout Mississippi. There are many evidences of existing problems and the need for better forestry practices. One of these is the fact that abuu*^ ^.700,000 acres of forest land have burned, on the average, each year for the past 5 years. Another obvious condition is that only a very small percentage of farmers thin their forests or make improvement or liberation cuttings, nor do they harvest only the timber that is ready to harvest. In too many cases no cutting is done for several years and then everything is cut. In other words, clear cutting is too gen- erally practiced. Other unsatisfactory practices could be mentioned but the fact that the average annual growth per acre is only about 100 board feet is evidence enough that better practices are needed. Forestry specialists estimate that the average production per acre per year of Mississippi's forests should be 300 board feet or better with the use of good forestry practices. Through chemical and other research, many new wood products and uses of forest products are being found each year. Many of these products are necessary and some are indispensible in everyday life. Thus, forests are becoming, from day to day, increasingly im- portant. With the realization, by agricultural leaders and farmers, of these facts, viz., that forests provide a good part of the farm income, that forest products are becoming more important, and that farm woodlands could be made to provide a much greater income, there has been an increasing demand for information on this subject. The amount of experimental information on farm forestry is somewhat limited, especially in Mississippi, when compared to some other agri- cultural products. However, an attempt is made in this bulletin to bring together results of many experiments and other information available that seem applicable to Mississippi conditions and con- dense it as much as possible and yet cover the subject of forestry so far as it relates to farm woodlands and practices. It is hoped that this information will be helpful to agricultural leaders in directing and teaching farmers and farm boys to use better forestry practices, thereby increasing their farm income. Reference: Report of Mississippi State Forest Service in cooperation with United States Forest Service, "What the Forest and Forest Industries Mean to Mississippi," Jackson, Mississippi, 1945. FARM FORESTRY IN MISSISSIPPI 7 PART I FOREST ECONOMY OF MISSISSIPPI This first section is written with the view of giving the technical agriculture workers in Mississippi a clearer insight of the importance of forestry in the State. The discussion on economic importance was taken largely from an article by the Mississippi Forest and Chemurgic Association. ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE Mississippi's first principal industry was that of manufacturing forest products. As a foundation of industry and as a source of em- ployment of our people, timber has continued to hold this foremost place to this day. In 1944, the sale value of finished forest products in Mississippi was $137,025,852, as revealed by the State Tax Com- mission. During this period some 60,000 Mississippians were em- ployed as industrial workers and many more thousands as woods and maintenance crews. TIMBER A MAJOR SOURCE OF INCOME TO THE RAILROADS Most of the railroads in Mississippi were built primarily for the moving of timber products, many are still dependent to a great extent on timber movements and some could not exist were it not for the revenues they receive from this source. The Interstate Commerce Commission records show that the class-one railroads operating in Mississippi originated in carload lots 11,149,230 tons of revenue forest products in the years of 1943 and 1944. This tonnage amounted to 45 percent of the total tonnage originated by these roads during this 24-month period. According to records of the Mississippi Public Service Com- mission, all railroads operating in Mississippi in 1944 originated in carload lots 6,079,050 tons of revenue forest products, which amounts to 47 percent of all carlot tonnage originating in the State in 1944. TIMBER CONTRIBUTES TO SUPPORT OF MANY OTHER BUSINESS ENTERPRISES Truck, automobile and gas businesses supported by
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forest Farming
    Forest Farming Ken Mudge CY ROSE N NA Many sections of the Northeast have been reforested over the past century. Extensive forest cover is seen in this view from Wachu- sett Mountain in central Massachusetts. armers harvest crops from their fields, and agroforestry—a multidisciplinary approach to loggers harvest trees from their forests, agricultural production that achieves diverse, Fbut what do forest farmers harvest? The profitable, sustainable land use by integrating answer is an eclectic collection of non-timber trees with non-timber forest crops. forest crops like maple syrup, medicinal herbs, While some other agroforestry practices begin fruits, gourmet mushrooms, and nuts. with planting young trees that take years to Forest farming is an approach to forest man- mature, forest farming involves planting non- agement that combines some of the manage- timber forest crops beneath the canopy of an ment practices of conventional forestry with established forest. In other words, other agro- those of farming or gardening to achieve forestry practices bring the forest to the crops, an environmentally and economically sus- whereas forest farming brings the crops to the tainable land-use system. It is one of several forest. In this regard it is helpful to consider related practices that fall under the domain of the role of forest farming in overall forest man- Forest Farming 27 agement. A forest farm should be designed to bearing trees including walnuts and peaches, emulate as much as possible a natural forest. but there is no evidence of deliberate culti- This includes characteristics of a healthy forest vation of useful crops beneath the canopy of ecosystem such as species diversity, resilience established forest.
    [Show full text]
  • FAOSTAT-Forestry Definitions
    FOREST PRODUCTS DEFINITIONS General terms FAOSTAT - Forestry JOINT FOREST SECTOR QUESTIONNAIRE Item Item Code Definition code coniferous C Coniferous All woods derived from trees classified botanically as Gymnospermae, e.g. Abies spp., Araucaria spp., Cedrus spp., Chamaecyparis spp., Cupressus spp., Larix spp., Picea spp., Pinus spp., Thuja spp., Tsuga spp., etc. These are generally referred to as softwoods. non-coniferous NC Non-Coniferous All woods derived from trees classified botanically as Angiospermae, e.g. Acer spp., Dipterocarpus spp., Entandrophragma spp., Eucalyptus spp., Fagus spp., Populus spp., Quercus spp., Shorea spp., Swietonia spp., Tectona spp., etc. These are generally referred to as broadleaves or hardwoods. tropical NC.T Tropical Tropical timber is defined in the International Tropical Timber Agreement (1994) as follows: “Non-coniferous tropical wood for industrial uses, which grows or is produced in the countries situated between the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn. The term covers logs, sawnwood, veneer sheets and plywood. Plywood which includes in some measure conifers of tropical origin shall also be covered by the definition.” For the purposes of this questionnaire, tropical sawnwood, veneer sheets and plywood shall also include products produced in non-tropical countries from imported tropical roundwood. Please indicate if statistics provided under "tropical" in this questionnaire may include species or products beyond the scope of this definition. Year Data are requested for the calendar year (January-December) indicated. 2 Transactions FAOSTAT - Forestry JOINT FOREST SECTOR QUESTIONNAIRE Element Element Code Definition code 5516 Production Quantity Removals The volume of all trees, living or dead, that are felled and removed from the forest, other wooded land or other felling sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Wood Chip Fuel Depends on the Size of the Installation in Which It Is to Be Used: Pieter D
    Harvesting / Transportation No. 6 The quality requirements for wood chip Quality wood chip fuel depends on the size of the installation in which it is to be used: Pieter D. Kofman 1 Small boilers (<250 kW) require a high quality wood fuel with a low moisture content (<30%) and a small, even chip with few, if any, Quality wood fuel depends mainly on: oversize or overlong particles. A • moisture content, low level of fungal spores is required. • particle size distribution, Medium boilers (250 kW<X<1 MW) • tree species, are more tolerant of moisture content (30-40%) and can handle a • bulk density, coarser chip than small boilers. • level of dust and fungal spores in the fuel, and Still, the amount of oversize and overlong particles should be • ash content. limited. A low level of fungal spores is required. Good quality wood chip fuel is produced by machines with sharp knives, with the ability to vary the size of chip produced to meet end-user specifications. Other Large boilers (>1 MW) are tolerant machines use hammers or flails to reduce particle size and produce hogfuel, of both moisture content (30-55%) and chip quality. The level of fungal which is unsuitable for use in small installations. Large installations can, spores can be higher because however, also have problems in handling and combusting hogfuel. For forest these installations usually take thinnings and other roundwood, chipping is the preferred option. their combustion air from the chip silo which reduces spore This note deals with wood chips only, even though there are other wood fuels, concentrations in and around the such as hogfuel, sawdust, firewood, peelings from fence posts, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • SHELTON RESEARCH, INC. 1517 Pacheco St
    SHELTON RESEARCH, INC. 1517 Pacheco St. P.O. Box 5235 Santa Fe, NM 87502 505-983-9457 EVALUATim OF LOW-EMISSION WOOD STOVES by I Jay W. Shelton and Larry W. Gay Shelton Research, Inc. P.O. Box 5235 ! 1517 Pacheco Street Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 [ June 23, 1986 FINAL REPORT I OON1RACT A3-122-32 Prepared for CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD P.O. Box 2815 1102 Q Street Sacramento, California 95812 Shelton Research, Ince Research Report No. 1086 I, TABLE CF CDmN.rS la PAGE 1' 1 LIST Clii' T~S••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• I~ LIST OF FIGURES •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ii r } 1. SlM'v1ARY AND CINa.,USICNS •••••••••••••••••••• 1 ~- 2. RE~T1rns•••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 3 ! 3. I N'IRmJCTI. rn••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 4 4. APPLIANCE AND FUEL SELECTirn••••••••••••••• 5 5. 'IEa-IN"I oo_, JI'IIDAOI. •••.•••••...•.•••••.•••. 14 Test cycles •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 14 Installation••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 16 Stove Q?eration•••••••••••••••••••••••••• 16 Fuel Properties•••••••••••••••••••••••••• 16 Measursnent Methods •••••••••••••••••••••• 18 Data Acquisition and Processing•••••••••• 29 r; 6. RESlJI..,TS. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 30 J Introduction••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 30 Units for Fmissions •••••••••••••••••••••• 30 E:x: tra Tes ts •• ., •• "•••••••••••••••••••••••• 30 Particulate Matter ••••••••••••••••••••••• 31 Oeosote•••••• ., •••••••••••••••••••••••••• 32 P.AII. ••••••••••• o • •••••••••••••••••••••••• 32 l NOx •••••••••• t.10••·········· ............. 32 .Amoonia and cyanide••••••••••••••••••••••
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Wood Preservative Treatment of Beehives on Honey Bees Ad Hive Products
    1176 J. Agric. Food Chem. 1984. 32, 1176-1180 Effect of Wood Preservative Treatment of Beehives on Honey Bees and Hive Products Martins A. Kalnins* and Benjamin F. Detroy Effects of wood preservatives on the microenvironment in treated beehives were assessed by measuring performance of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies and levels of preservative residues in bees, honey, and beeswax. Five hives were used for each preservative treatment: copper naphthenate, copper 8-quinolinolate, pentachlorophenol (PCP), chromated copper arsenate (CCA), acid copper chromate (ACC), tributyltin oxide (TBTO), Forest Products Laboratory water repellent, and no treatment (control). Honey, beeswax, and honey bees were sampled periodically during two successive summers. Elevated levels of PCP and tin were found in bees and beeswax from hives treated with those preservatives. A detectable rise in copper content of honey was found in samples from hives treated with copper na- phthenate. CCA treatment resulted in an increased arsenic content of bees from those hives. CCA, TBTO, and PCP treatments of beehives were associated with winter losses of colonies. Each year in the United States, about 4.1 million colo- honey. Harmful effect of arsenic compounds on bees was nies of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) produce approxi- linked to orchard sprays and emissions from smelters in mately 225 million pounds of honey and 3.4 million pounds a Utah study by Knowlton et al. (1947). An average of of beeswax. This represents an annual income of about approximately 0.1 µg of arsenic trioxide/dead bee was $140 million; the agricultural economy receives an addi- reported.
    [Show full text]
  • English-Portuguese Equivalents of Forestry and Conservation Terms Termos Equivalentes Em Silvicultura E Conserva@O Portugub-Ingl
    English-Portuguese Equivalents of Forestry and Conservation Terms Forest Service Southern Forest Experiment Station Termos Equivalentes em silvicultura e New Orleans, Louisiana conserva@o Portugub-InglQs General Technical Report so-1 09 September 1994 John K. Francis ENGLISH-PORTUGUESE EQUIVALENTS OF FORESTRY AND CONSERVATTON TERMS John K. Francis FOREWORD cooperative research and technology transfer in the Amazon Basin. This dictionary of forestry Signs of deterioration of the global environ- and conservation terms has been prepared to aid ment and threatened destruction of the vast in communications with our Portuguese-speak- Amazon forest have stirred a call for action. ing colleagues and for the benefit of others fac- Conservationists have always been concerned ing similar language barriers. about the tropical forests; now funds are being made available for increased work on problems Forestry and conservation are very broad in the region. Brazilian scientists struggle to fields, which include many subfields that have communicate with colleagues in the rest of the large and detailed vocabularies. I have attempted world while scientists from other areas are dis- to collect the most common and useful of these covering that to work effectively in Brazil, one terms and determine the equivalencies in English must speak Portuguese. One must also be able and Portuguese. In many cases, several terms to read Portuguese to benefit from the local tech- denote the same concept. They will be listed nical literature. separately, alphabetically in the primary lan- guage (left hand column), and in series in the English-speaking scientists have not pre- secondary language (right hand column) with the pared themselves particularly well in other lan- most common term placed first.
    [Show full text]
  • Profitable Farms and Woodlands a Practical Guide in Agroforestry for Landowners, Farmers and Ranchers
    Profitable Farms and Woodlands A Practical Guide in Agroforestry for Landowners, Farmers and Ranchers Alley Cropping Table of Contents Introduction...................................................................................... iii Forest Farming Forest Purpose .............................................................................................. v Contributors ..................................................................................... vii AGROFORESTRY PRACTICES Riparian Buffer Strips Riparian Buffer Alley Cropping ................................................................................. 1 Forest Farming ................................................................................. 19 Riparian Buffer Strips ...................................................................... 47 Silvopasture ....................................................................................... 57 Silvopasture Windbreaks ....................................................................................... 73 Windbreaks INTRODUCTION This handbook is part of an interdisciplinary, interinstitutional and comprehensive effort to develop a practical guide to assist underserved and limited resource small farmers and woodland owners to adopt best management technologies in agroforestry. Funding for this effort was provided through the USDA National Agroforestry Center (NAC) from the US Forest Service and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) under cooperative agreement number 68-7482-7-361 with Tennessee State
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Wood Distillation
    Bibliography of WoodDistillation T.CL[). Compiled by Gerald A.Walls Arranged by Morrie Craig BibliographY 5 October 1966 For.stProductsResearch FOREST RESEARCHLABORATORY OREGON STATEUNIVERSITY Corvallis PROGRAM AND PURPOSE The Forest Research Laboratoryof the School of Forestry combines a well-equipped laboratory witha staff of forest and wood scientists in program designed to improve the forestresource and promote full uti- lization of forest products. Theextensive research done by the Labora tory is supported by the forest industryand by state and federal funds. The current report results fromstudies in forest products, where wood scientists and technologists,chemists, and engineers are con- cerned with properties, processing,utilization, and marketing of wood and of timber by-products. The PROGRAM of research includes identifying and developing chemicals fromwood, improving pulping of wood and woodresidues, investigating and improving manufacturingtechniques, extending life of wood by treating, developing better methods ofseasoning wood for higher quality and reduced costs, cooperating with forest scientists to determineeffects of growing conditionson wood properties, and evaluating engineering properties ofwood and wood- based materials and structures. The PURPOSE of researchon forest products is to expand markets, create new jobs, and bringmore dollar returns, thus advancing the interests of forestry and forestindustries, by > developing products from residuesand timber now wasted, and > improving treatment and designof present wood products. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 3 BOOKS 4 ARTICLES AND BULLETINS 5 PATENTS 46 Australia 46 Austria 46 Be1giun 46 Canada 47 Czechoslovakia 47 Denmark 47 France 47 Germany 51 Great Britain 52 India 55 Italy 55 Japan 55 Netherlands 56 Norway 56 Poland 56 Russia 56 Spain 57 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United States 59 Bibliography of Wood Distillation INTRODUCTION This bibliography is a revision and extension to1964 of Bibli- ography of Wood Distillation, 1907-1953published in 1955.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Evaluation of Biochar Obtained from the Pyrolysis of Pine Pellets
    J Therm Anal Calorim (2016) 126:1879–1887 DOI 10.1007/s10973-016-5683-4 Energy evaluation of biochar obtained from the pyrolysis of pine pellets 1 2 3 3 Lidya B. Santos • Maria V. Striebeck • Marisa S. Crespi • Jorge M. V. Capela • 3 1 Clovis A. Ribeiro • Marcelo De Julio Received: 1 June 2015 / Accepted: 3 July 2016 / Published online: 22 July 2016 Ó Akade´miai Kiado´, Budapest, Hungary 2016 Abstract The wood pellets are mainly used in heating compared to pellets in nature, showing a greater amount of environments, commercial and residential, as well as fuel energy per unit, high stability, reduced moisture content for production of thermal and electric energy in industrial and reduced ash content. The kinetic of combustion to plants. Furthermore, the heterogeneity and variable mois- biochar in oxygen-rich atmosphere showed the dependence ture content, combined with the high cost of transport, are between the activation energy and conversion degree, with limiting challenges that must be overcome with new a continuous decrease in the activation energy, character- technologies and new products. In this context, torrefaction istic of complex processes comprised by initial reversible and pyrolysis are attractive alternatives for increasing reaction followed by an irreversible one. energy density and decreasing the moisture content of the samples, based on thermochemical conversion in a non- Keywords Energetic characterization Á Torrefaction Á oxidizing atmosphere. Samples were produced to perform Pyrolysis Á Pine pellets Á Biochar Á Non-isothermal kinetic the energetic characterization of biochar from pine pellet using different heating rates 5–30 °C min-1, different residence temperatures 200, 280 and 570 °C and different Introduction residence time (1 and 0.5 h).
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Creosote Supply and Quality by Richard Harris, Koppers Industries
    Trends in Creosote Supply and Quality by Richard Harris, Koppers Industries Introduction This paper examines the ten-year outlook for wood-preserving creosotes in North America. The major factors determining creosote availability and quality in the future will be the quantity of coal tar produced in the United States, and the economics of the competing uses for coal tar distillates. Major Uses of Coal Tar Distillates Though no two tar plants are exactly alike, in general we may say that two distillate streams are initially generated during the production of coal tar pitch (see chart). The first distillate off, representing 20 percent of the tar, is generally known as chemical oil. It is the fighter fraction, containing from 40 to 55 percent naphthalene. The second, heavier distillate is the creosote fraction used to make wood preservative and carbon black. It accounts for 30 percent of the crude tar. The remainder, about half of the tar is carbon pitch for the aluminum and graphite industries. This is the product which drives the domestic tar distillation business. Each distillate may then be processed to create value-added products. Solvent from which resins are made, naphthalene for plastics and pesticides, and "correction oil" for use in wood-preserving creosote are all derived from the chemical oil. In North America, most of the creosote fraction produced is combined with correction oil, or in some instances unprocessed chemical oil, to make AWPA-specification creosotes. The heavy distillate left over after wood preserving needs are met is sold as carbon black feedstock. In the rest of the world, this fraction is mostly used for the production of carbon black and anthracene oil.
    [Show full text]
  • Balancing Conservation with Utilization: Restoring Populations of Commercially Valuable Medicinal Herbs in Forests and Agroforests.1
    Balancing Conservation With Utilization: Restoring Populations of Commercially Valuable Medicinal Herbs in Forests and Agroforests.1 Richard A Cech2 ABSTRACT: This paper discusses the medicinal herb industry in relation to conservation of medicinal plants, including an overview of sustainable wildcrafting and sustainable forest agriculture. Goldenseal (Hydrastis canadensis) and Black Cohosh (Cimicifuga racemosa) are given as examples of wild herbs of economic importance which may be readily cultivated. Includes guidelines and techniques for forest farming of hardwood forest dependent species. Introduction plant). I was somewhere in the middle of a long learning. The answer for Chittum is, that if you cut Old Louie leaned on the fence, bending down the the tree off with a tall stump, it will coppice (ie. re- top wire, a wire already seriously stretched by the sprout from the stump), producing multiple trunks daily escape of our buck goat, who nobody except which bear useable bark again in a couple of years. myself was willing to tackle and bring back to Louie didn't know this, because he simply stripped pasture. Not that the rest of my family was afraid of the trees standing, and they died. the goat, but simply that he stank with an eye- smarting fragrance that only a doe goat in heat could I have made it my life work to learn the reproductive admire, and only a staunch believer in social life habits of many medicinal plants of prairie, forest, after garlic could possibly withstand for long. But mountain and swamp. Knowing how a plant Louie paid no attention to the vestigial aroma of reproduces is the first step to encouraging its growth goat-grease that exuded from the fence and in wild settings or in domestic culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Chesapeake Forest Restoration Strategy
    Eastern Region State and Private Forestry | NA-IN-03-13 | Revised September 2020 Chesapeake Forest Restoration Strategy Chesapeake Forest Restoration Strategy Acknowledgments Acknowledgments Written and edited by Katherine Brownson and Sally Claggett This revision of the Chesapeake Forest Restoration Strategy was a collaborative effort. State forestry agencies in all seven jurisdictions provided the impetus and continued support needed. Our advisory team members played a key role in developing and refining the content (listed on page 6). The following individuals also directly contributed content to the Strategy: Tracey Coulter (Pennsylvania Bureau of Forestry), Lindsey Curtin (U.S. Forest Service), Scott Eggerud (Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement), Louis Iverson (U.S. Forest Service), Kate Livengood (The Nature Conservancy), Kate McFarland (USDA National Agroforestry Center), and Matthew Peters (U.S. Forest Service). Our partners at the Chesapeake Bay Program Office helped with essential data and GIS support: Ruth Cassilly (University of Maryland Extension), Peter Claggett (U.S. Geological Survey), Nora Jackson (Chesapeake Research Consortium), and Jeff Sweeney (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). In addition, multiple individuals gave us their time, professional input, and other information that was instrumental in developing the Strategy: Mary Beth Adams, Carolyn Pike, and Al Steele (U.S. Forest Service); Melissa Deas (D.C. Department of Energy and Environment); Deborah Landau (The Nature Conservancy); and numerous members of the Chesapeake Bay Forestry Workgroup. Finally, Sandra Clark and Deborah Muccio (U.S. Forest Service) provided assistance with editing and design, respectively. We thank all these partners for making this Strategy a reality. Links to Websites All website hyperlinks are underlined in blue.
    [Show full text]