DOCSLIB.ORG

03 Ugps Bpa Update 3Nov07 Homer Neal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
03 Ugps Bpa Update 3Nov07 Homer Neal AAnn UUpdpdaattee oonn tthhee RReeppoorrtt ooff tthhee HHigighh EEnnerergygy PPhhyysisiccss AAddvvisisoorryy PPaannelel UUnniivverersisittyy GGrraannttss PPrrooggrraamm SuSubbppaannelel Homer A. Neal BPA Update November 3, 2007 1 PPuurrpposeose ooff SSttuudydy l TToo eexaxammiinnee tthhee ssttaattee ofof tthhee NNSSFF aanndd DoEDoE ggraranntt pprrooggrarammss ffoorr uunniivveerrssiittyy hhiigghh eenneerrggyy pphyhyssiicscs rreesseeararcchh,, ttoo ddooccuummeenntt tthheeiirr ssuucccceessssees,s, cchhaalllleennggeess aanndd pprroommiissee,, aanndd ttoo rreeccoommmmeenndd sstteeppss ttoo eennssuurree tthheeiirr ccoonnttiinnuueedd vviittaalitlity.y. 2 H. Neal, BPA, 3 November 2007 UGUGPSPS SSuubpbpaannelel MemMembbersershhipip l Thomas Applequist l Steve Olsen l Ritchie Patterson l Jonathan Bagger l Natalie Roe l Keith Baker l Randy Ruchti, ex officio l Jim Brau l Michael Shaevitz l Chip Brock l Elizabeth Simmons l Jordan Goodman l Wesley Smith, Vice-Chair l Chris Stubbs l Paul Langacker l Andy White l Kevin McFarland l P.K. Williams, ex officio l Homer Neal, Chair 3 H. Neal, BPA, 3 November 2007 SSuubbppaannelel DDaattaa CCoollellectctiioonn PPrroocceesssseses l Eight subpanel meetings across US l Two major surveys ( PI survey, Anonymous survey) l More than a thousand question-responses received l Five Town Hall meetings (DPF Honolulu, MIT, SLAC, CERN, Fermilab) l Multiple DPF mailings l Interactions with UEC, SLUO, DPF, agency officials, EPP2010 members, CoV’s, etc. l Informal reviews from field leaders at universities and national laboratories; and individuals outside field l Communications directly received by UGPS members 4 H. Neal, BPA, 3 November 2007 TThhee CChhaannggiinngg LLaannddssccaapepe (or why was a study needed?) l Particle physics in the United States stands at a crossroads. … it is a time of great opportunity. The LHC and new experiments in astrophysics, cosmology and neutrino physics promise to revolutionize particle physics and quite possibly, our understanding of the universe itself. l But …when the LHC begins operation and the three U.S. collider programs close, a major focus of U.S. particle physics will move offshore. All of this represents a substantial shift in the way particle physics is carried out in the United States. l This will challenge program management and force a new focus in the particle physics portfolio. In this new portfolio, the balance between large and small groups, old and new ones, infrastructure and research personnel, laboratories and universities must change to match the evolving scientific 5 opportunities. H. Neal, BPA, 3 November 2007 AssAssuumemedd PPrriioriorittiitteses l EPP2010 addressed why and how the US should maintain leadership in elementary particle physics. It highlighted the compelling science facing the field, together with its role in inspiring young scientists, attracting the best minds from around the world, and helping drive technological innovation in the US. l American physicists have played leading roles in advancing the field to the present threshold of discovery. The US program includes fulfilling the potential of the LHC, which includes a luminosity upgrade (SLHC), R&D on the International Linear Collider (ILC), preparation for a bid to host the ILC, and experiments in astrophysics, cosmology and neutrinos, together with a variety of smaller scale experiments. The UGPS Subpanel endorsed these priorities. The opening up of multiple new scientific frontiers is exciting and provides the field with a wealth of new 6 opportunities to explore. H. Neal, BPA, 3 November 2007 HHEEPP DDoEoE UUnniivveerrssiittyy PPrrooggrramam——BBuudgdgetet HHiissttoorryy (as presented to Subpanel in 9/2006) HEP University Program Funding MILLIONS OF AS SPENT DOLLARS 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 * Fiscal Year * President's Req. 7 H. Neal, BPA, 3 November 2007 NNSSFF EEPPPP FFunundidinngg HHiissttoryory EPP Funding by Fiscal Year $30,000,000 $25,000,000 EPP Univ CESR l e v $20,000,000 LHC OPs e L LHC Constr g $15,000,000 n i Accel (APPI) d n u $10,000,000 RSVP F PNA+UNDRGRND $5,000,000 Theory $0 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Fiscal Year 8 H. Neal, BPA, 3 November 2007 TThhee PPII SSuurrvveyey l Link to the online survey was sent out to 180 DOE PIs and 227 NSF PIs on January 2, 2007 l Received 129 DOE PI responses (72%) and 139 NSF PI responses (61%) at time of analysis. Overall response rate was 66%. l Total of 268 responses received representing 125 different institutions 9 H. Neal, BPA, 3 November 2007 Example of Data Collected …. What is your general impression of studnet interest in HEP compared to five years ago? 0.03 Much Lower 0.02 0.47 Somewhat Lower 0.23 0.33 1997 Survey About the Same 0.45 2007 Survey 0.16 Somewhat Higher 0.24 0.01 Much Higher 0.06 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 Percent of respondents 10 Rstcdms hmsdqdrs hm GDO g`r hmbqd`rdc rhmbd sdm xd`qr `fn- Another Example of PI survey results … How has the availability of technical personnel at your institution changed over the past ten years? Much Impro0ved.00 Somewhat Improved 0.11 About the Same 0.32 Somewat Reduced 0.31 Much Reduced 0.26 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 Percent of Respondents (148 total) 46$ r`x sdbg- odqrnmmdk hr rnldvg`s nq ltbg qdctbdc- 11 Another Example ….. What areas(s) of R&D does your group work on currently and what areas do you expect to be working on in 2012? Accelerator R&D Generic Detectors Astrophysics/Cosmology Detectors 2012 R&D Current R&D Neutrino Detectors or Sources LHC Detector Upgrades ILC Detectors 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Respondents ( out of 141 total) Q%C deenqs hr aqn`ckx chrsqhatsdc `bqnrr `kk ehdkcr- 12 H. Neal, BPA, 3 November 2007 Research Effort in FTE - Current and Estimated in 2012 Other Astrophysics & Cosmology Underground physics Neutrino physics Estimated Research Effort in 2012 Current Research Effort B and C physics ILC LHC Tevatron 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 FTEs KGB deenqs vhkk `klnrs cntakd hm mdws ehud xd`qr- 13 H. Neal, BPA, 3 November 2007 OOpenpen EEnnddeded SSuurrvveeyy l12381238 rreessppononssees.s. 14 H. Neal, BPA, 3 November 2007 8. Please share any additional comments or concerns you may have regarding the technical infrastructure at HEP universities, including policies and practices for supporting infrastructure by the funding agencies, and any suggestions you have to preserve, strengthen and make the best use of these important resources. 72 responses. l Near unanimous concern about the drift of funds away from technical infrastructure. “The technical support and infrastructure arecritical elements in maintaining the creative strength of the Universitiesbut despite recommendations from previous University panels the situation is very precarious. Theproblem we have, and I'm sure it's a common one, is that the support of ourmechanical engineer and our electronics engineer/physicist is partly from the base and partly from project funds but there is no continuity commitment to preserve the capabilities and personnel between projects and little coordination between base and project. Providing that the contributions are clear and excellent there should be at least a multi year commitment withbridging funds between projects” 15 H. Neal, BPA, 3 November 2007 iinnffrraassttruruccttureure,, cconont.t. l Respondents almost immediately go to laboratory– university comparisons. “Obviously, support for research infrastructure at universities is under severe pressure. I'm very concerned that efforts to keep funding up at every national lab is crippling university research support.” “The DOE should continue to support the technical infrastructureat HEP universities. Universities provide several advantages over, e.g., national laboratories:the availability of graduate and undergraduate students, the dedication of junior faculty working hard to establish a track record in their quest to attain tenure, and the efforts of senior faculty who have tenure and thus are free to apply all their creativity to a problem, perhaps finding an unconventional solution. It is no accident that many advances in particle physics (both detector and analysis methods) have come from researchers working at Universities.” 16 H. Neal, BPA, 3 November 2007 10. Please share any additional comments or concerns you may have regarding undergraduate and graduate students in HEP university groups. In particular, we are interested in the relative use of TA's and RA's to support students in experiment and theory, and how this may have changed over the past ten years. 95 responses. lThe use of TA support was discussed by many. lThe vast majority of theory respondents suggest partial or full time TA support is the norm, enhanced over previous years. lA few noted that experimental students are being asked to teach at an increased rate. lMany noted that teaching puts HEP at a competitive disadvantage and lengthens the time to degree. lSome noted that their degree programs require some teaching but others noted departments which forbid TA support of research students. lAll regret a shrinking RA budget, especially with an increased interest in HEP with LHC coming. 17 H. Neal, BPA, 3 November 2007 13. Please provide any further comments or suggestions on the peer review process for university grant management by DODOE and/or NSF. Be sure to indicate to which agency your comment refers. 75 responses. lSplit between the satisfied and the very unhappy. lMany noted that grants from both agencies seem to be based on incremental adjustments of the previous years’amount. lMost who had negative comments noted difficulty correlating positive reviews with positive action by the agencies’but that any non-spectacular review would result in negative action. 18 H. Neal, BPA, 3 November 2007 Do you think that HEP is well served by our particular two- agency arrangement? ---cont’d lof those who said their support was from: lNSF: 21 respondents, only 1 said yes, well served lNo.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Highlights Se- Mathematics and Engineering— the Lead Signers of the Letter Exhibit
    June 2003 NEWS Volume 12, No.6 A Publication of The American Physical Society http://www.aps.org/apsnews Nobel Laureates, Industry Leaders Petition April Meeting Prizes & Awards President to Boost Science and Technology Prizes and Awards were presented to seven- Sixteen Nobel Laureates in that “unless remedied, will affect call for “a Presidential initiative for teen recipients at the Physics and sixteen industry lead- our scientific and technological FY 2005, following on from your April meeting in Philadel- ers have written to President leadership, thereby affecting our budget of FY 2004, and focusing phia. George W. Bush to urge increas- economy and national security.” on the long-term research portfo- After the ceremony, ing funding for physical sciences, The letter, which is dated April lios of DOE, NASA, and the recipients and their environmental sciences, math- 14th, also indicates that “the Department of Commerce, in ad- guests gathered at the ematics, computer science and growth in expert personnel dition to NSF and NIH,” that, Franklin Institute for a engineering. abroad, combined with the di- “would turn around a decade-long special reception. The letter, reinforcing a recent minishing numbers of Americans decline that endangers the future Photo Credit: Stacy Edmonds of Edmonds Photography Council of Advisors on Science and entering the physical sciences, of our nation.” The top photo shows four of the five women recipients in front of a space-suit Technology report, highlights se- mathematics and engineering— The lead signers of the letter exhibit. They are (l to r): Geralyn “Sam” Zeller (Tanaka Award); Chung-Pei rious funding problems in the an unhealthy trend—is leading were Burton Richter, director Michele Ma (Maria-Goeppert Mayer Award); Yvonne Choquet-Bruhat physical sciences and related fields corporations to locate more of emeritus of SLAC, and Craig (Heineman Prize); and Helen Edwards (Wilson Prize).
    [Show full text]
  • Lab Partners: NSF and DOE
    Volume 19 FRIDAY, APRIL 5, 1996 Number 7 Lab Partners: NSF and DOE by Leila Belkora, Office of Public Affairs experiments have had co-spokesmen from NSF- funded university groups. n a spring day in Chicago, if you long for NSF also funds fixed-target experiments and Othe crack of the bat and the scent of mustard special projects at Fermilab. The agency supports on hotdogs, head to Wrigley Field. In the seventh groups at KTeV and NuTeV, where experi- inning stretch you’ll sing a chorus of “Take Me menters hope to shed light on CP violation and Out to the Ball Game,” along with announcer neutrino-nucleon scattering, respectively. Two Harry Caray; baseball at Wrigley just wouldn’t be experiments related to charm quarks, E831 and the same without it. After the game, should you E835, are supported in part by NSF. This year, travel about 40 miles west to Fermilab, approximately 70 graduate students are receiv- you’d find another essential pair- ing their training in NSF-funded ing: Fermilab depends on research groups both at collider funding from the Depart- and fixed-target experi- ment of Energy, but ments. On a smaller scale, high-energy physics NSF grants to Fermilab here would be incom- augment research in plete without the cosmology and facili- support of the tate international National Science collaborations in Foundation, as well. particle physics with I nside NSF’s largest India and Korea. f contribution at In dollars, Fermilab is to the col- NSF’s contribution lider program. At to the national high- Wonyong Lee DZero, seven NSF-sup- energy physics program Profile ported groups built the is about 10 percent that 2 central drift chamber, the of DOE.
    [Show full text]
  • Snowmass01 Masterreg DB 16May.FP5
    SNOWMASS 2001 Summary: Working Groups Name Nametag Institution EMail M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 ,1 Abe Toshinori Stanford Linear Accelerator Center [email protected] 1 ,2 Adams Todd Florida State University [email protected] 11 1 ,3 Adolphsen Chris Stanford Linear Accelerator Center [email protected] 11 ,4 Akerib Dan Case Western Reserve University [email protected] 11 ,5 Albright Carl H. Northern Illinois University [email protected] 11 ,6 Albrow Michael Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory [email protected] 11 11 ,7 Allen Matthew Stanford Linear Accelerator Center [email protected] 1 ,8 Appel Jeffrey Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory [email protected] 11 1 1 111 ,9 Artuso Marina Syracuse University [email protected] 1 ,10 Asiri Fred Stanford University [email protected] 1 ,11 Asztalos Steve Massachusetts Institute of Technology [email protected] 11 1 ,12 Atwood David Iowa State University [email protected] 11 13, Augustin Jean-Eude LPNHE Paris [email protected] 11 1 1 1 ,14 Avery Paul University of Florida [email protected] 11 1 1 ,15 Babukhadia Levan State University of New York, Stony [email protected] 1 1 111 ,16 Bachacou Henri Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory [email protected] 111 1 ,17 Baer Howard Florida State University [email protected] 11 1 11 ,18 Baker Winslow Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory [email protected] 11 ,19 Balazs Csaba University of Hawaii [email protected] 111 ,20 Barber Desmond DESY, Hamburg [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • APS News July 2018, Vol. 27. No. 7
    July 2018 • Vol. 27, No. 7 A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY Homer Neal 1942-2018 Page 3 APS.ORG/APSNEWS Update on the APS Strategic Plan Throughout 2018, APS mem- bers, leadership, and staff have been preparing a new Strategic Plan to guide the Society in coming years (see APS News, February 2018). Archiving Knowledge about Physics Teaching MISSION VALUES VISION The process began in early 2018 at By Charles Henderson and Paula Heron the APS Leadership Convocation Do laboratory experiments help at the founding and develop- when elected leaders of mem- students learn concepts? Why do ment of Physical Review Physics bership units (Divisions, Topical so few women choose to major in Education Research in 2005, now Groups, Forums, and Sections) pro- physics? What is the most impor- a central and open-access home for vided input. Town hall meetings tant skill for a high school physics this work. and invited focus groups convened teacher to develop? The close connection between at the APS March and April meet- and Increasing Organizational Physics education researchers PER and physics as a discipline ings to gather direct member com- Excellence. tackle these and many other ques- was acknowledged by the American ment. CEO Kate Kirby provided an At its June retreat, the Board tions about why students study Physical Society Council in its update at the annual APS Business spent considerable time discuss- physics, what they learn, and 1999 Statement on Research in common teaching strategies and Meeting on April 13 and a member ing progress on the Plan. In guid- how their experiences affect their Physics Education [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Snowmass01 Masterreg DB.FP5
    SNOWMASS 2001 Summary: Working Groups Name Nametag Institution EMail M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 1 Abe, Toshinori Stanford Linear Accelerator Center [email protected] 1 2 Adams, Todd Florida State University [email protected] 11 1 3 Adolphsen, Chris Stanford Linear Accelerator Center [email protected] 11 4 Akerib, Dan Case Western Reserve University [email protected] 11 5 Albright, Carl H. Northern Illinois University [email protected] 11 6 Albrow, Michael Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory [email protected] 11 11 7 Albuquerque, Ivone Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory [email protected] 11 8 Aldering, Greg Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory [email protected] 11 9 Allen, Matthew Stanford Linear Accelerator Center [email protected] 1 10 Allen, Roland Texas A&M University [email protected] 111 11 Appel, Jeffrey Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory [email protected] 11 1 1111 12 Artuso, Marina Syracuse University [email protected] 1 13 Asiri, Fred Stanford University [email protected] 1 14 Asner, David Lawrence Livermore National Laboratoy [email protected] 11 1 11 15 Asztalos, Steve Massachusetts Institute of Technology [email protected] 11 1 16 Atwood, David Iowa State University [email protected] 11 17 Augustin, Jean-Eude LPNHE Paris [email protected] 11 1 1 1 18 Avery , Paul University of Florida [email protected] 11 1 1 19 Babukhadia, Levan State University of New York, Stony Brook [email protected] 1 1 111 20 Bachacou, Henri Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory [email protected] 111 1 21 Baer, Howard Florida State University [email protected] 11 111 22 Bagger, Jonathan Johns Hopkins University [email protected] 11111 23 Baker, Winslow Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory [email protected] 11 24 Balantekin, A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002-03 College Template
    Volume XV College of Arts & Sciences Alumni Association Fall 2003 Letter from the chair Department proud of recent research, new faculty hanks for taking the time to learn James Glazier, a senior biophysicist who Institute of Health; and Robert de Ruyter more about some of the exciting joins us from Notre Dame; Mark Messier, van Steven, who joins us from Princeton. Tevents that have taken place in the an experimental high energy physicist from We will be highlighting the research IU Department of Physics over the last Harvard; and Rex Tayloe, who joined our activities of these four most recent additions year. What a fantastic time to be chair of nuclear group two years ago from Los to the faculty in our next newsletter. the IU physics department! I am blessed Alamos National Laboratory. We will also It is a privilege and honor to serve the IU with an energetic, enthusiastic faculty that be joined this fall by Sima Setayeshgar, a Department of Physics, and I am grateful is constantly developing new ways of biophysicist from Princeton; Jon Urheim, for your support. I look forward to the improving the learning environment for our an experimental high-energy physicist from opportunities ahead and wish each of you students and providing the thriving research the University of Minnesota; John Beggs, a every success in the year ahead. environment that is at the heart of our biophysicist joining us from the National — James Musser academic program. In this newsletter you’ll find articles about a number of important new elements of our research program, such Biocomplexity research experiences growth as our new low energy neutron scattering facility (LENS), which was approved for Since the beginning of a nascient variety of spatial and temporal struc- construction by the NSF this summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan/Feb 2015
    I NTERNATIONAL J OURNAL OF H IGH -E NERGY P HYSICS CERNCOURIER WELCOME V OLUME 5 5 N UMBER 1 J ANUARY /F EBRUARY 2 0 1 5 CERN Courier – digital edition Welcome to the digital edition of the January/February 2015 issue of CERN Courier. CMS and the The coming year at CERN will see the restart of the LHC for Run 2. As the meticulous preparations for running the machine at a new high energy near their end on all fronts, the LHC experiment collaborations continue LHC Run 1 legacy to glean as much new knowledge as possible from the Run 1 data. Other labs are also working towards a bright future, for example at TRIUMF in Canada, where a new flagship facility for research with rare isotopes is taking shape. To sign up to the new-issue alert, please visit: http://cerncourier.com/cws/sign-up. To subscribe to the magazine, the e-mail new-issue alert, please visit: http://cerncourier.com/cws/how-to-subscribe. TRIUMF TRIBUTE CERN & Canada’s new Emilio Picasso and research facility his enthusiasm SOCIETY EDITOR: CHRISTINE SUTTON, CERN for rare isotopes for physics The thinking behind DIGITAL EDITION CREATED BY JESSE KARJALAINEN/IOP PUBLISHING, UK p26 p19 a new foundation p50 CERNCOURIER www. V OLUME 5 5 N UMBER 1 J AARYN U /F EBRUARY 2 0 1 5 CERN Courier January/February 2015 Contents 4 COMPLETE SOLUTIONS Covering current developments in high-energy Which do you want to engage? physics and related fi elds worldwide CERN Courier is distributed to member-state governments, institutes and laboratories affi liated with CERN, and to their personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • APS Election Results
    July 2015 • Vol. 24, No. 7 Physicists Improving Lives A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY Pages 3 & 5 WWW.APS.ORG/PUBLICATIONS/APSNEWS Newly-Elected IUPAP Officers Meet in Trieste, Italy APS Election Results By Aihua Xie and Kennedy Reed The 2015 Executive Council and As this issue of APS News goes to press, Commission Chairs (C&CC) Meet- votes in the APS general election are still ing of the International Union of being counted. Members are voting for Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP) was held April 24-26 at the Inter- Vice President, Chair-Elect of the APS national Center for Theoretical Nominating Committee, and International and General Physics in Trieste, Italy. Counselors. For the first time, members are also elect- IUPAP promotes international cooperation in physics and spon- ing an APS Treasurer, a position on the Board of sors four types of international Directors created as part of recent changes in APS and regional conferences. These governance. All those elected will take office on Janu- include (1) general conferences, (2) topical conferences, (3) special ary 1, 2016, when the current Vice President becomes conferences, and (4) workshops APS President-Elect, and the President-Elect in developing countries. In addi- becomes President. tion, IUPAP Commissions sponsor From left to right: Beverly Berger, Aihua Xie, Kennedy Reed and Heidi Schell- IUPAP Young Scientist Prizes to man near the International Center of Theoretical Physics (ICTP). recognize outstanding early-career Voting ended on June 30, 2015 and the results can be physicists, and also sponsor other Four APS members attended the designate; Heidi Schellman, Oregon found at www.aps.org/about/governance/election/ awards to recognize excellence in IUPAP C&CC meeting: Kennedy State University, Vice Chair of the the subfields of physics represented Reed, Lawrence Livermore National IUPAP Commission on Particles by the Commissions.
    [Show full text]
  • DISCLAIMER This Document Was Prepared As an Account of Work
    DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor the University of California nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government of the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or the University of California, and shail not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. Work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract W-7405-Eng-48. CONF-9003115- Proceedings DE9I 009432 of the 17th Annual Day of Scientific Lectures and 13th Annual Meeting of the National Society of Black Physicists Edited by Kennedy J. Reed The 1990 Annual Meeting was sponsored by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Additional sponsors were the Office of Naval Research (ONR), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the National Society of Black Physicists (NSBP) and Southern University. The meeting was held on the campus of Southern University, Baton Rouge. 1 DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMIT6B TABLE OF CONTENTS Tribute to Ernest Coleman 1 Homer A.
    [Show full text]
  • History Newsletter CENTER for HISTORY of PHYSICS&NIELS BOHR LIBRARY & ARCHIVES Vol
    History Newsletter CENTER FOR HISTORY OF PHYSICS&NIELS BOHR LIBRARY & ARCHIVES Vol. 45, No. 2 • Winter 2013–2014 1,000+ Oral History Interviews Now Online Since June 2007, the Niels Bohr Library societies. Some of the interviews were Through this hard work, we have been & Archives (NBL&A) has been working conducted by staff of the Center for able to receive updated permissions to place its widely used oral history History of Physics (CHP) and many were and often hear from families that did interview collection online for its acquired from individual scholars who not know an interview existed and are researchers to easily access. With the were often helped by our Grant-in-Aid pleased to know that their relative’s work help of two National Endowment for the program. These interviews help tell will be remembered and available to Humanities (NEH) grants, we are proud the personal stories of these famous anyone interested. to announce that we have now placed over two- With the completion of thirds of our collection the grants, we have just online (http://www.aip.org/ over 1,025 of our over history/ohilist/transcripts. 1,500 transcripts online. html ). These transcripts include abstracts of the interview, The oral histories at photographs from ESVA NBL&A are one of our when available, and links most used collections, to the interview’s catalog second only to the record in our International photographs in the Emilio Catalog of Sources (ICOS). Segrè Visual Archives We have short audio clips (ESVA). They cover selected by our post- topics such as quantum doctoral historian of 75 physics, nuclear physics, physicists in a range of astronomy, cosmology, solid state physicists and allow the reader insight topics showing some of the interesting physics, lasers, geophysics, industrial into their lives, works, and personalities.
    [Show full text]
  • September Meeting, 2007
    JUNE MEETING, 2018 The University of Michigan Ann Arbor June 21, 2018 The regents met at 3:05 p.m. in the Glick Ballroom, Postma Family Golf Course Club House. Present were President Schlissel and Regents Behm, Bernstein, Ilitch, Newman, Richner, Ryder Diggs, Weiser and White. Also present were Chancellor Borrego, Vice President Churchill, Vice President Harper, Executive Vice President Hegarty, Vice President Hu, Chancellor Little, Vice President Lynch, Vice President May, Vice President Michels, Provost Philbert, Interim Vice President Rosenberg, Executive Vice President Runge and Vice President Wilbanks. Call to Order and President’s Opening Remarks President Schlissel called the meeting to order. He began with the sad news of the death of a preeminent UM scholar and leader Interim President Emeritus Homer Neal. He said, “Our society and our University have been made better by Dr. Neal’s achievements. In addition to being a pioneering researcher, he championed the idea that UM should engage our academic mission beyond the borders of our campus. Our students and the communities we serve continue to see the benefits of his vision. I am very appreciative of Dr. Neal’s passion for fostering undergraduate participation in research and his willingness to step forward and serve our campus community with distinction as interim president. I ask that we observe a moment of reflection as we remember Dr. Homer Neal.” President Schlissel turned to other news and reported that UM had maintained its ranking as the top U.S. public university in the QS World University Rankings for 2018-19. The ranking is based on six factors: academic reputation, employer reputation, faculty-student ratio, number of citations per faculty, proportion of international faculty and proportion of international students.
    [Show full text]
  • Faces & Places
    CERN Courier September 2018 Faces & Places Discover these and more – download the first chapter of every title for free. A WARDS iopscience.org/books IOP award winners for 2018 announced J Thomas, KCL, S Bates, M Alexander, R Hahn/Fermilab, J Ramage Each year, the UK Institute of Physics (IOP) Expanding PhysicsTM recognises outstanding and exceptional contributions to physics. 2018 sees five IOP Expanding Physics IOP Expanding Physics IOP Expanding Physics IOP Expanding Physics awards go to those working in high-energy Key Nuclear Reaction An Introduction to A Short Course Nuclear and physics and related fields. Experiments Elementary Particle on Relativistic Particle Physics Jenny Thomas from University College Discoveries and consequences Phenomenology Heavy Ion Collisions Claude Amsler London received the Michael Faraday Medal Hans Paetz gen. Schieck Philip G Ratcliffe Asis Kumar Chaudhuri and Prize “for her outstanding investigations into the physics of neutrino oscillations, in particular her leadership of the MINOS/ MINOS+ long-baseline neutrino-oscillation experiment”. MINOS was one of the seminal oscillation experiments, confirming that accelerator neutrinos change type as they travel. Thomas was one of a handful of people who orchestrated the formation of the collaboration, becoming co-spokesperson in 2010 and leading the proposal of a new phase Prize winners (clockwise from top left): Jenny Thomas, Bobby Acharya, Michael Begg, of the MINOS experiment, MINOS+. Hiranya Peiris, Stefan Söldner-Rembold and James Ramage. IOP Expanding Physics IOP Expanding Physics IOP Expanding Physics IOP Expanding Physics Bobby Acharya from the International Centre for Theoretical Physics in Italy and Ltd from a manufacturer of conventional Fermilab from 2009 to 2011.
    [Show full text]