Phytosanitary Resources Page: Reorganisation plan Background The Capacity Development Committee (CDC) of the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) asked Green Ink to undertake an examination of phytosanitary.info with a view to possibly reorganising the content and presentation of the material available on the website. An earlier report (WO4-T2 Report 2015-07-01) covered the assessment of the site and responses to a set of semi-structured interview questions, while WO4- T3 Report 2015-09-03 reported on promoting and monitoring for the site. Although both reports contained recommendations for changes to the site, they did not detail how those changes might be implemented. The Work Order specifies that these are the basis of Task 4:  Produce a proposed plan for reorganization of the Phytosanitary Resources page. This should be based on a review of existing layout and content of the page. This document is our response to Task 4. Introduction As we have indicated previously, it is difficult to produce a reorganisation plan for the phytosanitary.info website1 without a very much clearer idea of the resources that could be devoted to meeting the CDC’s objectives for the site. Two questions, in particular, need to be answered with clarity before you undertake any reorganisation.  Is the site going to continue to develop as a library, or will it pivot to become more of a catalogue?  Is there any possibility of appointing a web editor with subject matter and technical knowledge? The answers will determine what is possible for the reorganisation. Library versus catalogue The objective of the site is clear: to “serve as a repository of information, databases, tools and technical resources developed by the IPPC Secretariat

1 Note that although IPPC commonly refers to the site as a “page” this is misleading, as it actually consists of a very large number of pages. We will generally refer to the site as a whole, except when we specifically mean individual pages, such as might be found under one of the navigation tabs.

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 1 and contributed by external plant health organizations to support the implementation of the IPPC and its standards.” Largely as a result, the site tries to maintain copies of contributed documents on the site. We question, however, whether this is a good approach for an online resource. The primary difficulty is that having copies of resources on the site means that they easily can become disconnected from the most up-to-date versions. If a contributor updates the resource on their own site and fails to notify the CDC or to upload the new version to phytosanitary.info, then the version on the site becomes less useful. One solution might be to ask contributors to check their submissions on a regular basis to ensure that they are up to date, but this would put an additional burden on the contributors. A better solution, in our opinion, is to host links to resources, rather than the resources themselves. This uses the power of hyperlinks to simplify the process of making useful information available to visitors to the site. It simplifies the submission process, which might result in more submissions. It probably also simplifies the approval process. 2 Combined with curated summaries, it makes searching on the site a more powerful tool. Finally, it makes it easier to maintain the information on the site, because it is relatively easy to automate the process of checking each link on a regular basis.3 Some visitors are said to have poor connectivity, which makes it valuable for them to be able to access documents directly from the site. However, if connectivity is poor, it is surely as poor for access to the phytosanitary.info site as it is to other sites via hyperlinks. Unless the CDC is considering distributing the entire site as a standalone application, this is a weak reason to hold copies of documents that can be found elsewhere. There does seem to be an increasing trend to have links on the site, particularly to other websites where there is really no alternative, short of embedding that site in a frame on the phytosanitary site. At this stage in the phytosanitary.info site’s evolution, there are few enough resources that converting all contributed resources to links, as part of a thorough review of the resources, could be considered. Human curation In previous reports, we have pointed out that the usability of the site suffers as a result of its over-reliance on automated methods, for example in presenting results for browsing and search. We have previously indicated areas in which we believe that a person with some subject knowledge and technical ability

2 It could even remove the need for formal approval, replacing it with a yes/no decision and a blanket statement that the submissions are provided for information and are not endorsed by the CDC. 3 The need for regular checking cannot be overstressed, as the table in the Annex reveals with over 130 broken links.

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 2 would be able to make the resources easier to find, and hence make the site much easier to use. The most important aspect of the planned reorganisation, in our view, is to appoint a web editor who is capable of preparing and working with the material online and is empowered to do so. If the CDC decides to address this issue, we foresee an initial, intense period in which existing material is reorganised and brought up to date, followed by a less intense period of maintenance and absorption of new resources. Site organisation In the Task 2 Report, we made several observations about the organisation of the site and the presentation of information, and suggested a new information architecture. To summarise, we recommended testing a main menu with the following tabs: About Resources Projects Consultants Library Contributed Images Resources Technical Videos and Resources Presentations IPPC Media Standards resources

The secondary menu should be removed and a link to IPPC Standards placed under Resources. The link to the IRSS Helpdesk could be placed in a footer. Overall, the number of modules on the index page (and elsewhere) should be reduced. Many of these are forms of search (see below) or duplicate information that is better placed elsewhere. All could be replaced with a single module of Useful Links. Search The site is intended to be a repository of useful phytosanitary information. The ability to search and browse — and to decide quickly whether the information the searcher needs can be found on the site — is thus crucial to meeting this objective. Better presentation of search results is arguably the most important change necessary to improve the site. The Work Order recognises this, referring specifically to the need for site visitors to be able to find materials by topic, by pest and by source as well as information on consultants with specific expertise and online courses. There are two ways in which site visitors search for information: so-called organic searches, before they have arrived at the site, and internal searches, after arriving. Both must be reorganised.

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 3 Organic search Search engines, of which Google is the best known, use automated “spiders” to index the contents of a website. The information gathered by the spider, which includes incoming links that point to the site in question and many other factors, is then used by the search engine to build an overall index and give each of the site’s pages a weighting, or rank, for the words on the page. When a visitor types a term into the search engine, it returns a ranked list of pages that it believes meet the searcher’s needs. Many searchers never venture beyond the first page of search engine results. Thus if your page has a low rank in searches for a topic, most visitors will never get there from a search engine. As pointed out in the T2 report, the phytosanitary.info site does very poorly in Google searches.4 So although the site may well provide information that people are looking for, they most likely will not find it through a search engine. Several steps can be taken to improve search rankings and usability:  Fix the robots.txt file on the site so that it allows search engines to crawl the site and offer a description based on the metadata provided by the site.  Ensure that the PDFs hosted on the site can be crawled and indexed. That would involve completing the metadata for each PDF, giving it a search-friendly title that makes good use of keywords; checking that any links in the PDF are accurate; and ensuring that the version of the PDF on the site is suitable for the majority of PDF readers.  Curate the title and summary text of PDFs and put the summary on the HTML page, so that even if the PDF on its own would not be highly ranked, the HTML page that refers to it is highly ranked. Internal search At present, the site offers far too many ways to search for and browse content, none of which is particularly useful. Many of the modules on various pages are versions of search, but they are idiosyncratic in the results that they present (examples were noted in the T2 report). If the site is optimised for external searches, a viable approach to internal search would then be to present the results of a Google search, restricted to the phytosanitary.info domain, on the site, using a Drupal module that implements the Google Custom Search Engine. This might be the simplest alternative. An even better approach, however, would be to rethink how resources on the site are categorised.

4 A recent check confirmed that, if anything, results are now even worse than the first time we searched, with no links to the site in the first 50 results. Results are better in a search for “phytosanitary info,” which is good, but the site still prevents Google displaying anything about the site.

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 4 The site currently uses both categories and tags to describe resources, but uses them inconsistently. Categories are a more restrictive and higher-level taxonomy than are tags, ideally with a fixed ontology and firm rules as to how any given resource is categorised. Ideally, every resource should belong to one or two categories only. If a newly-submitted resource does not obviously fit into an existing category, then a careful decision needs to be taken to decide either to add a new category or expand the definition of an existing category to enable the new resource to be included. Categories essentially represent the types of resources, such as contributed resources, IPPC resources, diagnostic protocols, identification keys and so on. Tags, by contrast, are far more numerous than categories, and a resource might have several tags, such as species, source, activity (surveillance, certification, etc.), country, region, commodity, and so on. It appears that many potential tags are currently stored in the various database fields associated with each resource on the site but they are not being effectively used in internal searches. We examined the 317 contributed resources presented at http://www.phytosanitary.info/contributed-resources. We did not consider the IPPC Technical Resources as those are, we understand, under the strict control of the IPPC Secretariat. In passing, however, we note that the presentation of these resources on the IPPC Technical Resources Page (http://www.phytosanitary.info/ippc-technical-resources) does not seem to follow its own internal logic. IPPC capacity development and resources presentation, for example, is tagged as Manual/Guide but is presented in the Training kit module. The Annex to this report presents the results of our study of the contributed resources. We have suggested a category and one or more tags (keywords) for each. We have also noted the links that are broken and so cannot be used by visitors to reach the indicated resource, and have identified some errors in the presentation of information. The categories are: Advocacy, Database, Diagnostic protocol, Information, Organisations, Pest control, PRA, Template5, Training Fixing the categories and tags of all of the resources is a necessary precursor to improving searches and should be done during the site reorganization. The consistent display of tags, linked to the internal search engine, will also enable visitors to easily find all material that shares a common tag, such as pest, commodity or activity.

5 As there is only one resource in this category, it could, perhaps, be placed under Information, although we are not sure how useful it would be there either.

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 5 In parallel, the internal search engine and presentation of results need to be improved and simplified.  Remove all options other than a single search box.  Present search results that consist of a meaningful title and usable summary to allow visitors to decide quickly whether they have found what they are looking for.  Relegate advanced searches to a sub-page of search and allow free-form use of Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) rather than forcing use of the database fields. Consider also the recommendation in the T2 Report to permit Google Analytics to track internal searches, as this can be helpful in identifying what visitors are looking for and making those resources easier for everyone to find. Site membership At various places on the site and on pages linked to from the site, visitors are asked to register or log in. It is not clear what the value of signing in might be to the visitor. In cases where there is a clear need for the system to track the identity of a person, then clearly some form of registration and log in is needed. This is certainly the case for online courses, where a single system ought to be in place across all the domains. At present, there seem to be several different logins and it is not clear why this is so or which particular login identity is being requested. A registered identity is also necessary for consultants who wish to be listed, but this too could use the same, single system. It may well be the case that the CDC wishes to track who is visiting a particular page on the site, but there are other ways of doing so and the value to the visitor is very debatable. The CDC has not said what it uses the information for. Is it to solicit contributions, or acknowledge them? Is it to alert registered visitors to developments on the site or in the CDC? The need to register and log in could actually be a disincentive to people using the resources and we recommend that it be abandoned. In addition, I could not find a reference to a privacy statement anywhere on the site. If there is a good case to be made for gathering personal information, then we recommend you make it. 6 We also recommend that you make the process of registration attractive to visitors, so that they find it worthwhile. About page text The Work Order asks for a draft text for the About page. As we noted in earlier reports, the current text is too historical and process-oriented. It ought to provide information about the site. Here is a first draft of suggested text:

6 There may be a legal requirement for a privacy statement; this requires further research. In any case, good practice suggests the need for such a statement.

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 6 The website at phytosanitary.info is a repository of information that we hope people will find useful. It is intended for plant health professionals involved in the implementation of the International Plant Protection Convention and may also be useful in other activities related to plant health. Resources on this site come from the IPPC and many other sources. All resources are reviewed by the Capacity Development Committee of the IPPC before being included. We encourage all visitors to [submit additional resources in any language for consideration] (link to page with details). The site is maintained by the IPPC Secretariat. We welcome any [feedback and suggestions for improvements to the site] (link to email or internal comment form). In the T2 Report we recommended that a new, more positive disclaimer appear as a footer on this and all other pages: “The resources in phytosanitary.info have been reviewed and accepted for inclusion by the Capacity Development Committee of the IPPC. However, the content is the responsibility of the contributors.” We also strongly recommend that the modules Resources by Tag and How to contribute phytosanitary technical resources (X2) be removed from the About page. A link, rather than full details, is more appropriate. Photo resources Many people will find a good library of images related to plant health very useful. This section could therefor be very valuable. However, the presentation needs to be a lot more attractive than at present, and the image pages need additional functionality. The main source of photos on the site appears to be submissions for photo contests in 2015 and 2016. At the moment, the photos are just placed on the page in no particular order; they need to be assigned key words and organized into categories such as species, activity. The photo contest ended many months ago; the tab and all the pages that were beneath it should be removed and the best photos placed in a photo or visual library. If there is another contest, it should be a project, with the photos only becoming part of the photo library once the awards have been made. Over time, it will be desirable to grow the photo library by soliciting contributions outside the scope of the photo contest. The easiest way to do that would be to prominently display a request for photos on the About page, with specifications as to dimensions, captions and metadata required and a dedicated email address for receiving the photos. Again, the primary requirement is for a photo library that visitors can easily browse through. Ideally, this would involve the implementation of a gallery

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 7 and lightbox facility on the site, which would allow visitors to search for, browse, examine, select and download the images they want. Installing and maintaining such a facility may be more than the CDC wants to undertake. If that is the case, we would recommend shifting the burden of hosting and display to a site such as Flickr and using CDC resources to ensure that the images placed there are well described and have appropriate licences. The photo page on phytosanitary.info site could then be used to display an attractive, curated selection of a few images, with prominent links to the chosen image host. It will be possible to use analytics to track who used the links on the phytosanitary.info photo page to visit the image hosting service. Other resources might be included in a photo library, such as slideshows and presentations, and these would benefit from an presentation with lightbox- like facilities for browsing, selecting and downloading. Again, an external hosting service, such as Slideshare, may be the least difficult way of implementing this on the site. Related material Indicating specific related materials is a difficult process at the best of times, since it depends on knowing what a visitor is looking for. If a visitor arrives from a search engine, it is possible to use the information in the search query to pre-populate a results page with other pages on the site that match the specific query. If a visitor arrives after searching within the site, the best recourse is to have a prominent "Back" link that will return them to their search results. A useful presentation of internal search results will also display sufficient information to allow the visitor to decide whether this is in fact a resource that might meet their needs. Finally, a programmatic approach to related results, while often supplied as a code module in content management systems, is often the least useful to visitors. If such a module is implemented, then it requires care to attach weightings to the metadata that will accurately pull out results that truly are related. The actual coding of such a module and assigning weights is beyond the scope of this Work Order. However, we would advise that the greatest weight be given to category. Thereafter, the number of tags in common will determine relatedness. Thus, two entries in the same category that share two tags will be placed above two entries in the same category that share only one tag. The code should avoid displaying a fixed number of related items; rather, it should display all items that match, up to a specified minimum level. Note that this approach applies primarily to resources. Other pages on the site are less likely to benefit from displaying related material, and instead will profit from having useful outline landing pages with an indication of the content of additional levels on the site.

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 8 Naming conventions The Work Order asks for a proposed protocol for file names of resources hosted on the site, to make them easier for visitors to identify. It is important to distinguish two different kinds of “file name” to which this might apply. One is the actual name of the document file that is hosted on the site. The other is the name, or title, given to that document file when it is made available through the site, usually as the text in a link. In general, the visitor does not need to to see the actual file name at any stage. In many cases, exposing the file name is, as the Work Order recognises, counter-productive, leading to confusion and uncertainty. The title of the resource is a much more important piece of information, both to the visitor trying to find something and to the search engine assisting them. To take two examples from the Latest Update module: 7 October 2015: International Pest Risk Research Group 5 October 2015: Digital identification tool: Invasive mites The first gives no clue what it is actually about: A call for experts? A report? A university entity? If it had a more informative title — for example “Website of pest-risk research group” — visitors would not need to click before deciding that it might be of interest. A brief, one sentence description, written in-house, rather than copied from the source website, could serve the same purpose, if displayed with the title. The second is more informative, and hence more useful. One improvement might be to change the order of words, to “Invasive mites: A digital identification tool” as this would help visitors to skim through the batch of similar titles. In some cases (e.g. Digital identification tool: Lepintercept) a more informative rewritten title would be much more useful. Ideally, the the title of the resource presented to the site visitor would be distinct from the name of the file behind the resource. As an interim step, we recommend adding the year and month of addition to the site to the front of the current file name. This would allow for regular, systematic checking of the accuracy of information and links. Resources that remain current can then have their file names updated to reflect the year and month in which they were checked. These dates, however, should not be included in any link text that is presented to site visitors, as the date is of purely administrative value and is not something the visitor needs to know or to see. Any formal protocol for naming is generally going to be less useful than a well- constructed title. In fact, a strong case can be made for retaining the original name (not title) supplied by the contributor, because the file name is probably part of the information that the contributor uses to identify the resource, with

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 9 the addition of a date as suggested above. We recommend, therefore, that the site move away from using the document or resource name as the title of its entry on the site, and instead provide more informative titles and human- curated one-sentence summaries. Titles and summaries should be the responsibility of the CDC in order not to place further obstacles in the way of contributors. We also recommend that, here as elsewhere, more attention be paid to accuracy and proofreading. Metrics In earlier reports we made several detailed recommendations for changes to Google Analytics and to the site. To recapitulate, we recommended that you: • Use the notes function in Google Analytics to record major changes and events on the site. • Exclude IPs originating in FAO. • Exclude referrer spam. • Enable Webmaster Tools for the site. • Track internal search terms. • Track individual downloads. We also recommended that you consider implementing an independent analytics package. As a first priority, we would suggest that a decision be taken on whether to rely on Google Analytics or to install an independent package. If you decide to stay with Google, a responsible person should be encouraged to undertake online certification in the use of Google Analytics. This will enable them easily to carry out all recommendations and to derive more value from Google Analytics in future. A responsible person could also deal with slightly more advanced requirements, for example blocking the referrer spam that currently distorts the site’s metrics. They could also enable tracking of individual downloads, although this could also be accomplished by a consultant in 2–3 days. Regardless of how download tracking is implemented, it would result in additions to the Google Analytics dashboard that a qualified person will be able to see, analyse and report on as part of the regular reporting of metrics that we also recommend. Metrics reporting would occur at three levels. Ideally, the IPPC Secretariat would casually look at the metrics about once a week to monitor and correct urgent issues and crawl errors. This weekly scan would be supplemented by a more detailed review every month, noting any interesting information and

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 10 making use of it. For example, if there seems to be particular interest in a specific document, access to that document can be made prominent on the index page and this fact noted in the Google Analytics timeline. Once a quarter, a written report should be prepared for circulation to the CDC and other interested parties. The report should highlight trends in key performance indicators (which would have been agreed first), summarise activity and suggest any desirable changes to the presentation and content on the site. Quick fixes and long-term improvements The bulk of this report addresses the long-term improvements that are needed for the site to deliver on the objectives established for it. Making these improvements requires giving attention to the resources available for the ongoing maintenance of the site even before any redevelopment takes place. In the meantime, we recommend the following quick fixes: • Establish higher standards for writing, editing and proof-reading all text on the site and ensure that those standards are implemented and maintained. • Adopt a new approach to document titles, as opposed to file names, and ensure that all new resources have a summary of less than 50 words. • Rewrite the About page. • Remove superfluous modules from, for example, the About page. • Rewrite the wording of the footer that appears on every page to make it more positive and inviting. • Make better use of Google Analytics, as detailed above. • Set key performance indicators and report on them regularly, making changes where indicated.

Another quick fix that could be easily implemented would be to take a different approach to displaying Latest Updates on the home page. Latest Updates are currently presented in a module that contains a bare list of 10 dates and titles; these are unlikely to entice site visitors to explore further. The illustrated modules that take up the bulk of the page below the image carousel, while attractive, are undated and are not kept fresh. Some are also repeated in the image carousel, which is a waste of screen real estate. Thus a repeat visitor to the site may not realise at first glance that there is anything new of interest. We therefore strongly recommend that four of the six modules below the image slider be repurposed to present latest updates. They should contain an image, the title of the new or updated resource and a single

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 11 sentence describing the resource and why it might be of interest to a specific audience. For example: A Guide to Delivering Phytosanitary Diagnostic Services is now available to download. The information will be of interest to NPPOs and others responsible for identifying possible plant pests. In this case, a more inviting image than the front cover of the Guide would be best. As each new resource is added it should displace the oldest one. This still allows for two modules, perhaps the top two, to be used as pointers to other items of interest, such as specific calls to action of various kinds. Suggested layout The work order calls for “images of suggested layout” to address the identified challenges and to guide the redevelopment of the website. It is far too early in the process of redevelopment to be thinking about what the site could look like. Much more important is to decide what the site is for, how it might be used and how it will be managed and maintained. We could certainly provide pictures of a site reflecting our suggested information architecture, but we would be remiss to do so if we did not also reiterate that there are, in our view, fundamental challenges for the site organisation and management that have implications far beyond appearance. We therefore recommend that the strategic purpose and operation of the site be considered in depth before embarking on any redesign. Conclusion The phytosanitary.info website is clearly an important resource for professionals in plant health. As explained in earlier reports, one could simply leave it at that; if people need to find specific information, they will have to learn to use the site with all its idiosyncrasies. However, it is equally clear that the CDC would like to make the site more useful and that to do so requires making it more attractive and easier to use. Throughout this series of reports, we have stressed that the future development and maintenance of the website depends crucially on the resources that can be devoted to it. This need for support applies to reorganisation and maintenance both, because if it is left alone, a website quickly degrades in many different ways. We therefore strongly recommend that the CDC implement the quick fixes proposed above. While that is being done, thought should be given to the future reorganisation and maintenance of the site, which would entail adopting the additional recommendations in these reports. It is worth

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 12 reiterating, too, that many quick fixes that relate to analytics will provide valuable information to guide any strategic redevelopment of the site.

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 13 Annex: Categorisation of Contributed Resources

Title of resource Proposed Tags Type Note category Plant biosecurity videos Advocacy Video, Consumers, Australia Link For travellers taking agricultural Advocacy Leaflet, Consumer, PDF products of Japan Guidelines, Japan Protecting Japanese Agriculture Advocacy Booklet, Japan, Consumer PDF and Forests - Functions of Plant Protection Stations Importing timber and timber Advocacy Booklet, Australia, PDF products? Guidelines, Forestry and Timber, Producers Vital information for plant Advocacy Leaflet, Producers, PDF producers Guidelines, Australia Fruit fly and the Home Garden Advocacy Information, Fruit fly, Link Australia, Guidelines Presentation on the Market Advocacy Trade PDF Access manual -guide to phytosanitary issues for NPPOs PaDIL – High quality images and Database Images, Biodiversity Link Information tools designed for Biosecurity and Biodiversity Digital identifcation tool: Cut Database Identification, Horticulture, Link flower Flowers, Africa Digital identification tool: Dried Database Identification, Horticulture Link Botanical Digital identification tool: Database Identification, Horticulture, Link Cultivated Palms Palms Digital identification tool: Database Identification, Horticulture, Link Microlepidoptera on Solanaceae Solanums Digital identification tool: Twig Database Identification, Forestry and Link girdlers Timber Digital identification tool: Database Identification, Forestry and Link Xyleborini Ambrosia Beetles Timber Digital identifcation tool: Flat Database Identification, Mites Link Typo in title Mites Digital identifcation tool: Hispines Database Identification, Beetles Link Typo in title beetles Digital identification tool: Database Identification, Aquatic Link Aquarium and Pond Plants plants Digital identification tool: Pacific Database Identification, Ants Link Invasive Ant Key Digital identification tool: Database Identification, Ants Link Introduced Ants Digital identifcation tool: Database Identification, Lepidoptera Link Typo in title Tortricidae Digital identification tool: Pests Database Identification, Horticulture, Link and Diseases of Cultivated Palms Palms, Pests Digital identification tool: Database Identification, Fruit fly Link Anastrepha and Toxotrypana Digital identification tool: Database Identification, Beetles Link Cerambycoid Families

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 14 Title of resource Proposed Tags Type Note category Digital identifcation tool: Federal Database Identification, Weeds Link Typo in title noxious weed disseminules Digital identification tool: Database Identification, Beetles Link Diabrotica species Digital identification tool: Database Identification, Mites Link Invasive Mites Digital identification tool: Database Identification, Aphids Link Cosmopolitan and Polyphagous Aphid Species Digital identification tool: Database Identification, Beetles Link Ironclad and Cylindrical Bark Beetles Digital identification tool: Wood Database Identification, Beetles Link Boring Beetle families Digital identification tool: Ligh Database Identification, Lepidoptera Link Typo in title Brown Apple Moth Digital identification tool: Bark Database Identification, Beetles Link Typo in title Beetle of the southerneastern U.S. Digital identification tool: Bark Database Identification, Beetles Link Beetle genera of the U.S. Digital identification tool: Pink Database Identification, Lepidoptera, Link Bollworm Bollworm Digital identification tool: Database Identification, Molluscs Link Typo in title Terrestrial Mollusc Digital identification tool: Citrus Database Identification, Citrus, Link Diseases Diseases Digital identification tool: Database Identification, Lepidoptera Link Lepintercept Digital identification tool: Database Identification, Grasshoppers Link Grasshoppers of the western U.S. Digital identification tool: Citrus Database Identification, Citrus, Insect Link Pests pests Pest Factsheet: Tortricids Database Identification, Lepidoptera, Link PDF seems Torticids superfluous EPPO Diagnostic protocol for Diagnostic Liberibacter, Citrus, Link ‘Candidatus Liberibacter protocol Diseases africanus’, ‘Candidatus Liberibacter americanus’ and ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ EPPO Diagnostic protocol for Diagnostic Pseudomonas Link Pseudomonas syringae pv. protocol actinidiae EPPO Diagnostic protocol for Diagnostic Nematodes Link Nematode extraction protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocol for Diagnostic Tomato, ToCV, TICV Link Tomato chlorosis virus and protocol Tomato infectious chlorosis virus EPPO Diagnostic protocol for Diagnostic Fungi, Fraxinus Link Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocol for Diagnostic Mites, Solanums Link Tetranychus evansi protocol

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 15 Title of resource Proposed Tags Type Note category EPPO Diagnostic protocol for Diagnostic Drosophila Link Drosophila suzukii protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocol for Diagnostic Fruit fly, Bactrocera Link Bactrocera zonata protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocol for Diagnostic Virus, Solanums Link Pepino mosaic virus protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Oomycetes Link Phytophthora kernoviae protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Horticulture Link Fusarium foetens protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Bacterial spot Link Xanthomonas spp. protocol NAPPO Diagnostic Protocol for Diagnostic Citrus, Diseases PDF Broken link Citrus Huanglongbing protocol NAPPO Diagnostic Protocol for Diagnostic Citrus, Diseases PDF Broken link Citrus Tristeza Virus (CTV) protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Fruit fly Link Ceratitis capitata protocol ELISA tests for plant pathogenic Diagnostic Bacteria, ELISA Link bacteria protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Nematodes Link Meloidogyne enterolobii protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Fungi Link Anisogramma anomala protocol Rep-PCR tests for identification of Diagnostic Bacteria, PCR Link bacteria protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Bacterial wilt, Phaseolus Link Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens protocol pv. flaccumfaciens EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Fruit fly, Mango Link Ceratitis cosyra protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Bacteria, lucerne, alfalfa Link Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. protocol insidiosus EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Beetles, Mango Link Sternochetus mangiferae protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Nematodes Link Hirschmanniella spp protocol Indirect immunofluorescence test Diagnostic Bacteria, Link for plant pathogenic bacteria protocol Immunofluorescence EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Beetles, Potato Link Epitrix cucumeris, E. similaris and protocol E. tuberis EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Lepidoptera, Palms Link Paysandisia archon protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Fungi, Conifers Link Gremmeniella abietina protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Fungi, Poplar Link Melampsora medusae protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Bacteria, Grapevine Link Xylophilus ampelinus protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Fruit fly Link Rhagoletis completa protocol

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 16 Title of resource Proposed Tags Type Note category EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Nematodes Link Xiphinema americanum sensu protocol lato EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Fungi, Conifers Link Gibberella circinata protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Phytoplasma, Citrus Link Candidatus Phytoplasma protocol aurantifoliae EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Nematodes, Soybean Link Heterodera glycines protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Fungi Link Diaporthe vaccinii protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Bacterial wilt, Carnation Link Burkholderia caryophylli protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Beetle, Japanese beetle Link Popillia japonica protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Nematodes Link Ditylenchus destructor and protocol Ditylenchus dipsaci EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Lepidoptera Link PDF seems Opogona sacchari protocol superfluous EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Fungi, Fungal wilt, Hop Link Verticillium albo-atrum and V. protocol dahliae on hop EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Oomycete, Sunflower Link Plasmopara halstedii protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Fungi Link PDF seems Gymnosporangium spp protocol superfluous EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Hemiptera Link PDF seems Maconellicoccus hirsutus protocol superfluous EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Hemiptera Link PDF seems Lepidosaphes ussuriensis protocol superfluous EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Bacteria, Apple Link PDF seems Candidatus Phytoplasma mali protocol superfluous EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Hemiptera Link Margarodes prieskaensis, protocol Margarodes vitis and Margarodes vredendalensis EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Beetles, Palms Link Rhynchophorus ferrugineus and protocol Rhynchophorus palmarum EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Bacteria, Strawberry Link Xanthomonas fragariae protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Virus, Cucurbits Link Cucumber vein yellowing virus protocol (Ipomovirus) Documentation and reporting on Diagnostic Reporting, Information Link a diagnosis protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Bacteria, Rice Link Xanthomonas oryzae protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Virus, Stone fruit Link American plum line pattern protocol ilarvirus

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 17 Title of resource Proposed Tags Type Note category Use of EPPO diagnostic protocols Diagnostic Information Link protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Bacteria, Maize Link Pantoea stewartii subsp. protocol stewartii EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Bacterial spot, Stone fruit Link Xanthomonas arboricola pv. protocol pruni EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Oomycete Link PDF seems Phytophthora ramorum protocol superfluous EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Nematodes Link Radopholus similis protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Bacteria, Pear Link PDF seems Candidatus Phytoplasma pyri protocol superfluous EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Mites Link PDF seems Eotetranychus lewisi protocol superfluous EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Aphids, Citrus Link PDF seems Toxoptera citricidus protocol superfluous EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Lepidoptera, Potato Link PDF seems Tecia solanivora protocol superfluous EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Bacteria, Potato Link Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. protocol sepedonicus EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Bacteria, Grapevine Link Grapevine flavescence doree protocol phytoplasma EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Fungi, Citrus Link Phoma tracheiphila protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Fungi, Conifers Link Mycosphaerella dearnessii and protocol Mycosphaerella pini EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Nematodes Link Meloidogyne chitwoodi and protocol Meloidogyne fallax EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Nematode, Potato Link Globodera rostochiensis and protocol Globodera pallida EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Bacteria, Aroids Link Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. protocol dieffenbachiae EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Nematodes, Conifer Link Bursaphelenchus xylophilus protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Fungi, Stone fruit Link Monilinia fructicola protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Nematodes Link Nacobbus aberrans sensu lato protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Fungi, Citrus Link Guignardia citricarpa protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Fungi, Wheat Link Tilletia indica protocol EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Virus, Sugar beet Link Beet necrotic yellow vein virus protocol (benyvirus)

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 18 Title of resource Proposed Tags Type Note category Evaluation of Lepidoptera Evidence Case study, Lepidoptera, PDF population suppression by FAO/IAEA radiation induced sterility Melon fly eradication project in Evidence Booklet, Japan, Eradication, PDF Okinawa, JAPAN Fruit fly, Case study Environmental Benefits of Medfly Evidence Sterile insect technique PDF Sterile Insect Technique in Madeira and their Inclusion in a Cost-Benefit Analysis Aquatic Plants-Their uses and Evidence Aquatic plants, Information PDF Risks Firewood Job Aid Information Leaflet, Forestry and Timber PDF ISPM 15 Implementation in Information Booklet, Forestry and PDF Australia Timber, Australia, Guidelines Weeds in Australia Information Information, Australia, Link Link to Weeds website; NOT a database. Pest Risk Assessment:Drosophila Information PRA, Drosophila, New PDF suzukii: spotted wing drosophila Zealand (Diptera: Drosophilidae) on fresh fruit from the USA Risk analysis of Halyomorpha Information PRA, Stinkbug, New Zealand PDF halys (brown marmorated stink bug) on all pathways Pest Risk Analysis on Dickeya Information PRA, Blackleg, Jamaica PDF solani Import risk analysis_Importation Information PRA, Potato, Jamaica PDF of Irish Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) seeds and ware from Canada & Netherland to Jamaica Importation of Brachiaria hybrid Information PRA, Weeds Jamaica PDF seeds, Mulatto II for planting in Jamaica Plant Health Australia (PHA) Organisations Information, Australia Link Link to website; NOT a database. International Pest Risk Research Organisations Membership, Information, Link Link to Group PRA website; NOT a database. Mitigating the Threat of Pest control Cactus moth PDF Cactoblastis cactorum to International Agriculture and Ecological Systems and Biodiversity Action Plan Peach Fruit Fly Pest control Fruit fly, Surveillance, PDF Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) Diagnostics Manual del Proyecto para el Pest control Mealybug, Surveillance, PDF Control Biológico de la Cochinilla Diagnostics Rosada del Hibisco

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 19 Title of resource Proposed Tags Type Note category Emerald Ash Borer Program Pest control Insects, Beetles, Forestry PDF Manual and timber, Surveillance, Diagnostics Grasshopper Guidebook Pest control Insects, Surveillance, PDF Provisonal Diagnostics Gypsy Moth Program Manual Pest control Insects, Lepidoptera, PDF Forestry and timber, Surveillance, Diagnostics Japanase Beetle Program Manual Pest control Beetles, Trade, Surveillance, PDF Typo in title for Airports Diagnostics Karnal Bunt Manual Pest control Fungi, Wheat, Surveillance, PDF Diagnostics Imported Fire Ant Program Pest control Ants, Surveillance, PDF Manual Diagnostics Mediterrean Fruit Fly Action Plan Pest control Fruit fly, Medfly, PDF Surveillance, Diagnostics Natural Enimies of True Fruit Pest control Fruit fly, Biological control, PDF Typo in title Flies(Tephritidae) Surveillance, Diagnostics Panicle Rice Mite Program Pest control Mites, Surveillance, PDF Manual Diagnostics Rangeland Grasshopper and Pest control Insects, Environmental PDF Typo in title Mormor Cricket Suppression impact, Surveillance, Program Diagnostics Biological Control of Pink Hibiscus Pest control Mealybug, Surveillance, PDF Mealybug Project Manual Diagnostics Golden Nematode Program Pest control Nematodes, Surveillance, PDF Manual Diagnostics New Pest Response Guideline Pest control Virus, Surveillance, PDF Typo in title Potyviruses(Family Potyviridae) Diagnostics New Pest Response Guideline Pest control Tomato, Tomato leafminer, PDF Tomato Leafminer (Tuta Surveillance, Diagnostics absoluta) New Pest Response Guideline Pest control Molluscs, Surveillance, PDF Tropical Terrestrial Gastropods Diagnostics New Pest Response Guidelines Pest control Molluscs, Surveillance, PDF Giant African Snails: Snail Pests in Diagnostics the Family Achatinidae New Pest Response Guidelines Pest control Insects, Hemiptera, PDF Cotton Seed Bug Surveillance, Diagnostics New Pest Response Guidelines Pest control Insects, Beetles, Forestry PDF Exotic Wood-Boring and Bark and timber, Surveillance, Beetles Diagnostics New Pest Response Guidelines Pest control Insects, Lepidoptera, PDF False Codling Moth Surveillance, Diagnostics Thaumatotibia leucotreta New Pest Response Guidelines Pest control Insects, Beetles, PDF Kaphra Beetle Surveillance, Diagnostics New Pest Response Guidelines Pest control Bacteria, Surveillance, PDF Ralstonia solanacearum race 3 Diagnostics biovar 2 New Pest Response Guidelines Pest control Insects, Weevils, PDF Red Palm Weevil Rhynchophorus Surveillance, Diagnostics ferrugineus

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 20 Title of resource Proposed Tags Type Note category New Pest Response Guidelines Pest control Insects, Lepidoptera, PDF Spodoptera Surveillance, Diagnostics New Pest Response Guidelines Pest control Insects, Lepidoptera, PDF Typo in title Leek Moth(Acrolepiopsis Surveillance, Diagnostics assectella (Zeller)) New Pest Response Guideline Pest control Insects, Lepidoptera, PDF Typo in Lymantriidae Surveillance, Diagnostics description New Pest Response Guidelines Pest control Oomycete, Horticulture, PDF Phytophthora species in the Surveillance, Diagnostics Environment and Nursery Settings New Pest Response Guideline Pest control Virus, Whitefly, PDF Whitefly Borne Geminiviruses Surveillance, Diagnostics Family Geminiviridae Technical Market Access Survey: PRA Booklet, Pineapple, Jamaica, PDF Cultivation of Ananas comosus Market Access (L.) Merr., (pineapple) in Jamica Technical market access survey, PRA Booklet, Onion, Jamaica, PDF Phytosanitary Situation of Onion Market Access (Allium cepa) in Jamaica, Destination: Trinidad and Tobago New plant pest report form: Template Reporting, Information PDF Preliminary Information Data Sheet National Detector Dog Manual Training Manual, Surveillance PDF Reviewer’s Manual for the Training Manual, Biological control, PDF Technical Advisory Group for Weeds Biological Control Agents of Weeds Review of heat treatment of Training Manual, Forestry and PDF wood and wood packaging timber, Heat treatment Rearing Codling Moth for the Training Manual, Sterile insect PDF Sterile Insect Technique technique, Codling moth Guidelines for the Revision of Training Manual, Legislation PDF National Phytosanitary Legislation Electronic Single Window Training Manual, Surveillance, PDF Coordinated Border Inspection Management - Best Practices Studies Performance, vision and Strategy Training Manual, Surveillance, PDF for National Plant Protection Inspection Organization Audit Procedures for Notification Training Manual, Legislation, PDF of Sanitary and Phtyosanitary Reporting Measures International Trade and Invasive Training Manual, Legislation, Trade PDF Alien Species Surveillance Protocol for the Training Manual, Surveillance PDF Tomato Leaf Miner, Tuta absoluta

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 21 Title of resource Proposed Tags Type Note category Guidance for Packing, Shipping, Training Manual, Sterile insect PDF Holding and Release of Sterile technique, Fruit fly Flies in Area-Wide Fruit Fly Control Programmes Product Quality Control and Training Manual, Sterile insect PDF Shipping Procedures for Sterile technique, Fruit fly Mass-Reared Tephritid Fruit Flies Trapping Guideline for Area-Wide Training Manual, Surveillance PDF Fruit Fly Programmes Collecting and preserving insects Training Manual, Diagnostics, PDF and arachnids Insects, Arachnids Collecting and Preserving Fungi Training Manual, Diagnostics, Fungi PDF Management of Plant Pathogen Training Manual, Diagnostics PDF Collections Guidelines for surveillance for Training Manual, Surveillance, PDF plant pests in Asia and the Pacific Inspection Manual for Agricultural Clearance Training Manual, Surveillance, PDF Inspection, Trade Agricultural Quarantine Training Manual, Surveillance, PDF Typo in Link Inspection Monitoring (AQIM) Inspection, Trade Handbook Miscellaneous and Processed Training Manual, Surveillance, PDF Products Inspection, Trade Regulation and Clearance from Training Manual, Surveillance, PDF Hawaii to Other Parts of the Inspection United States Emergency response manual Training Manual, Surveillance, PDF Inspection Treatment Manual Training Manual, Treatment PDF Clearing Nursery Stock and Training Manual, Surveillance, PDF Flower Bulbs for CBPAS (Customs Inspection, Trade and Border Protection Agricultural Specialists) Seeds not for planting Training Manual, Surveillance, PDF Inspection, Trade Export Manual Program Training Manual, Surveillance, PDF Typo in title Inspection, Trade Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Training Manual, Surveillance, PDF Import Manual Inspection, Trade A field manual for surveying and Training Manual, Surveillance, PDF mapping nationally significant Weeds weeds Regulation and Clearance from Training Manual, Surveillance, PDF Puerto Rico to Other Parts of the Inspection United States IPPC pest risk analysis training Training Manual, PRA Link Documents course duplicate those at link STDF Virtual Library Information Standards, Trade Link Broken link International Database on Insect Database Insects Link Broken link Disinfestation & Sterilization World-Wide Directory of SIT Database Sterile insect technique Broken link Facilities

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 22 Title of resource Proposed Tags Type Note category Exporting from Australia: Manual Australia, Quarantine, Broken link Includes quarantine information Exports on the export of plants and plant products from Australia Importing to Australia: Includes Manual Australia, Quarantine, Broken link quarantine information on the Imports import of plants and plant products to Australia Pest Information Document Database Pests, Insects Broken link Database Digital identification tool: Scale Information Pests, Insects Broken link Insects Diagnostic protocol for X-disease Diagnostic Diagnostics, X-disease Link is phytoplasma Protocol phytoplasma empty Diagnostic protocol for Potato Diagnostic Diagnostics, Potato Wart, Link is Wart (Synchytrium Protocol Synchytrium endobioticum empty endobioticum) Diagnostic protocol for Potato Diagnostic Diagnostics, Potato Mop- Link is Mop-Top Virus (PMTV) Protocol Top Virus empty Diagnostic protocol for Rice blast Diagnostic Diagnostics, Rice Blast, Link is (Magnaporthe oryzae) Protocol Magnaporthe oryzae empty Diagnostic protocol for Black rot Diagnostic Diagnostics, Black rot, Link is on grapevine (Guignardia Protocol Grapevine, Guignardia empty bidwellii) bidwellii Diagnostic protocol for European Diagnostic Diagnostics, Australia, Link is stone fruit yellows phytoplasma Protocol European stone fruit empty (Candidatus phytoplasma yellows phytoplasma, prunorum) Candidatus phytoplasma prunorum Diagnostic protocol for Chestnut Diagnostic Diagnostics, Chestnut blight, Link is blight (Cryphonectria parasitica) Protocol Cryphonectria parasitica empty Diagnostic protocol for Cherry Diagnostic Diagnostics, Cherry Leaf Roll Link is Leaf Roll Virus (CLRV (cherry and Protocol Virus empty walnut strains)) Diagnostic protocol for Asiatic Diagnostic Diagnostics, Asiatic citrus Link is citrus canker (Xanthomonas citri Protocol canker, Xanthomonas citri empty subsp. Citri) subsp. Citri Diagnostic protocol for Potato Diagnostic Diagnostics, Potato Spindle Link is Spindle Tuber Viroid, PSTVd Protocol Tuber Viroid empty Diagnostic protocol for Potato Diagnostic Diagnostics, Potato ring rot, No link, no ring rot (Clavibacter Protocol Clavibacter michiganensis document michiganensis subsp. subsp. Sepedonicus Sepedonicus) Diagnostic protocol for Pierce’s Diagnostic Diagnostics, Pierce’s Link is Disease (Xylella fastidiosa) Protocol Disease, Xylella fastidiosa empty Diagnostic protocol for Sudden Diagnostic Diagnostics, Sudden Oak Broken link Oak Death, Phytophthora Protocol Death, Phytophthora ramorum ramorum Diagnostic protocol for Poinsettia Diagnostic Diagnostics, Poinsettia Broken link Thrips (Echniothrips americanus) Protocol Thrips, Echniothrips americanus Diagnostic protocol for Avocado Diagnostic Diagnostics, Avocado Thrips, Broken link Thrips (Scirtothrips perseae) Protocol Scirtothrips perseae

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 23 Title of resource Proposed Tags Type Note category Diagnostic protocol for Plum Pox Diagnostic Diagnostics, Plum Pox Virus Broken link Virus (PPV) Protocol Diagnostic protocol for Apple Diagnostic Diagnostics, Apple Brown Broken link Brown Rot, Monilinia fructigena Protocol Rot, Monilinia fructigena The Australian Handbook for the Manual Australia, Identification, PDF Broken link Identification of Fruit Flies Fruit fly EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Trioza Broken link Trioza erytreae Protocol erytreae EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Rhizoecus hibisci Protocol Rhizoecus hibisci EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Scirtothrips aurantii, Scirtothrips Protocol Scirtothrips aurantii, citri and Scirtothrips dorsalis Scirtothrips citr,i Scirtothrips dorsalis EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Diaphorina citri Protocol Diaphorina citri EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Tomato yellow leaf curl Protocol Tomato yellow leaf curl begomovirus (TYLCV) and begomovirus, Tomato Tomato mottle mottle begomovirus begomovirus(ToMoV) EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Liriomyza spp Protocol Liriomyza spp EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Cryphonectria parasitica Protocol Cryphonectria parasitica EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Tomato ringspot nepovirus Protocol Tomato ringspot nepovirus (ToRSV) EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Aonidiella citrina Protocol Aonidiella citrina EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. Protocol Xanthomonas axonopodis citri pv. citri EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Lopholeucaspis japonica Protocol Lopholeucaspis japonica EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Tomato spotted wilt tospovirus, Protocol Tomato spotted wilt Impatiens necrotic spot tospovirus, Impatiens tospovirus and Watermelon silver necrotic spot tospovirus, mottle tospovirus Watermelon silver mottle tospovirus EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Thaumetopoea pityocampa Protocol Thaumetopoea pityocampa EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Aphelenchoides besseyi Protocol Aphelenchoides besseyi EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Diabrotica virgifera Protocol Diabrotica virgifera EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Bemisia tabaci Protocol Bemisia tabaci EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Potato Broken link Potato spindle tuber pospiviroid Protocol spindle tuber pospiviroid EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. Protocol Clavibacter michiganensis michiganensis subsp. michiganensis

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 24 Title of resource Proposed Tags Type Note category EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Plum Broken link Plum pox potyvirus Protocol pox potyvirus EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Pseudomonas syringae pv. Protocol Pseudomonas syringae pv. persicae persicae EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Unaspis citri Protocol Unaspis citri EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Protocol Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. albedinis albedinis EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Cacoecimorpha pronubana Protocol Cacoecimorpha pronubana EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Aleurocanthus woglumi Protocol Aleurocanthus woglumi EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Aleurocanthus spiniferus Protocol Aleurocanthus spiniferus EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Ralstonia solanacearum Protocol Ralstonia solanacearum EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Trogoderma granarium Protocol Trogoderma granarium EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Citrus Broken link Citrus tristeza closterovirus Protocol tristeza closterovirus EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Ceratocystis fimbriata f. sp. Protocol Ceratocystis fimbriata f. sp. platani platani EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Puccinia horiana Protocol Puccinia horiana EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Cacyreus marshalli Protocol Cacyreus marshalli EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Parasaissetia nigra Protocol Parasaissetia nigra EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Frankliniella occidentalis Protocol Frankliniella occidentalis EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Synchytrium endobioticum Protocol Synchytrium endobioticum EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Ciborinia camelliae Protocol Ciborinia camelliae EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Chrysanthemum stunt Protocol Chrysanthemum stunt pospiviroid pospiviroid EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Erwinia Broken link Erwinia amylovora Protocol amylovora EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Helicoverpa armigera Protocol Helicoverpa armigera EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Xanthomonas arboricola pv. Protocol Xanthomonas arboricola pv. corylina corylina EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Phytophthora cinnamomi Protocol Phytophthora cinnamomi EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Xylella Broken link Xylella fastidiosa Protocol fastidiosa EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Tobacco ringspot nepovirus Protocol Tobacco ringspot nepovirus

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 25 Title of resource Proposed Tags Type Note category EPPO Diagnostic protocols for Diagnostic Diagnostics, Europe, Broken link Ceratocystis fagacearum Protocol Ceratocystis fagacearum Pest Factsheet of Flowering Pest Control Fact sheet, Flowering trees, Broken link Trees: Eucalypt leaf Eucalypt leaf blight, blight (Phaeophleospora Phaeophleospora destructans) destructans Pest Factsheet of Seed-bearing Pest Control Fact sheet, Seed-bearing Broken link Trees: Annosus root and butt Trees, Annosus root and rot (Heterobasidion annosum) butt rot, Heterobasidion annosum Pest Factsheet of Seed-bearing Pest Control Fact sheet, Seed-bearing Broken link Trees: Pine pitch Trees, Pine pitch canker, canker (Fusarium circinatum) Fusarium circinatum Pest Factsheet of Seed-bearing Pest Control Fact sheet, Seed-bearing Broken link Trees: Nectria canker (Nectria Trees, Nectria canker, fuckeliana) Nectria fuckeliana Pest Factsheet of Seed-bearing Pest Control Factsheet, Seed-bearing Broken link Trees: Black stain root Trees, Black stain root disease (Ophiostoma wageneri) disease, Ophiostoma wageneri Pest Factsheet of Seed-bearing Pest Control Pest Factsheet of Seed- Broken link Trees: Laminated root rot bearing Trees: Laminated (Phellinidium weirii) root rot (Phellinidium weirii) Pest Factsheet of Seed-bearing Pest Control Pest Factsheet of Seed- Broken link Trees: Western gall bearing Trees: Western gall rust (Endocronartium harknessii) rust (Endocronartium harknessii) Pest Factsheet of Seed-bearing Pest Control Pest Factsheet of Seed- Broken link Trees: Armillaria root bearing Trees: Armillaria disease (Armillaria ostoyae) root disease (Armillaria ostoyae) Pest Factsheet of Flowering Pest Control Pest Factsheet of Flowering Broken link Trees: Casuarina blister bark Trees: Casuarina blister bark (Subramanianospora vesiculosa) (Subramanianospora vesiculosa) Pest Factsheet of Flowering Pest Control Pest Factsheet of Flowering Broken link Trees: Eucalyptus (guava) rust Trees: Eucalyptus (guava) (Puccinia psidii) rust (Puccinia psidii) Pest Factsheet of Flowering Pest Control Pest Factsheet of Flowering Broken link Trees: Sudden oak Trees: Sudden oak death (Phytophthora ramorum) death (Phytophthora ramorum) Pest Factsheet of Flowering Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Flowering Broken link Trees: Dutch elm Trees, Dutch elm disease (Ophiostoma ulmi) disease, Ophiostoma ulmi Pest Factsheet of Flowering Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Flowering Broken link Trees: Coniothyrium eucalypt Trees, Coniothyrium canker (Coniothyrium zuluense) eucalypt canker, Coniothyrium zuluense Pest Factsheet of Flowering Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Flowering Broken link Trees: Chestnut Trees, Chestnut blight (Cryphonectria parasitica) blight, Cryphonectria parasitica

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 26 Title of resource Proposed Tags Type Note category Pest Factsheet of Seed-bearing Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Seed- Broken link Trees: Giant woodwasp bearing trees, Giant (Urocerus gigas) woodwasp, Urocerus gigas, Insects Pest Factsheet of Seed-bearing Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Seed- Broken link Trees: Pine shoot bearing trees, Pine shoot moth (Rhyacionia buoliana) moth, Rhyacionia buoliana, Insects Pest Factsheet of Seed-bearing Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Seed- Broken link Trees: European spruce bark bearing trees, European beetle (Ips typographus) spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus, Insects Pest Factsheet of Seed-bearing Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Seed- Broken link Trees: Nun moth (Lymantria bearing trees, Nun monacha) moth, Lymantria monacha, Insects Pest Factsheet of Seed-bearing Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Seed- Broken link Trees: Bark bearing trees, Bark beetle (Hylurdrectonus beetle, Hylurdrectonus araucariae) araucariae, Insects Pest Factsheet of Seed-bearing Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Seed- Broken link Trees: Red turpentine bearing trees, Red beetle (Dendroctonus valens) turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus valens, Insects Pest Factsheet of Seed-bearing Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Seed- Broken link Trees: Mountain pine bearing trees, Mountain beetle (Dendroctonus pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae) ponderosae, Insects Pest Factsheet of Seed-bearing Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Seed- Broken link Trees: Southern pine bearing trees, Southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis) beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis, Insects Pest Factsheet of Seed-bearing Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Seed- Broken link Trees: Pine wood bearing trees, Pine wood nematode (Bursaphelenchus nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus) xylophilus, Insects Pest Factsheet of Seed-bearing Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Seed- Broken link Trees: Burnt pine longicorn bearing trees, Burnt pine beetle (Arhopalus ferus) longicorn beetle, Arhopalus ferus, Insects Pest Factsheet of Flowering Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Flowering Broken link Trees: White spotted tussock Trees, White spotted moth (Orgyia thyellina) tussock moth, Orgyia thyellina, Insects Pest Factsheet of Flowering Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Flowering Broken link Trees: Asian gypsy Trees, Asian gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) moth, Lymantria dispar, Insects Pest Factsheet of Flowering Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Flowering Broken link Trees: Carpenter Trees, Carpenter worm (Chilecomadia valdiviana) worm, Chilecomadia valdiviana, Insects

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 27 Title of resource Proposed Tags Type Note category Pest Factsheet of Flowering Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Flowering Broken link Trees: Asian longhorn Trees, Asian longhorn beetle (Anoplophora beetle, Anoplophora glabripennis) glabripennis, Insects Pest Factsheet of Flowering Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Flowering Broken link Trees: Emerald ash borer (Agrilus Trees, Emerald ash planipennis) borer, Agrilus planipennis, Insects Pest Factsheet of Flowering Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Flowering Broken link Trees: South African Trees, South African cossid (Coryphodema tristis) cossid, Coryphodema tristis, Insects Pest Factsheet of Timber in Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Timber in Broken link Service: Drywood longicorn Service, Drywood longicorn beetle, the Teak trunk borer beetle, Teak trunk borer, (Stromatium barbartum) Stromatium barbartum, Insects Pest Factsheet of Timber in Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Timber in Broken link Service: Powder post Service, Powder post beetle (Lyctus africanus) beetle, Lyctus africanus, Insects Pest Factsheet of Timber in Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Timber in Broken link Service: Western drywood Service, Western drywood termite (Incisitermes minor) termite, Incisitermes minor, Insects Pest Factsheet of Timber in Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Timber in Broken link Service: European house Service borer (Hylotrupes bajulus) Pest Factsheet of Timber in Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Timber in Broken link Service: Powder post beetle, Service, Powder post beetle, auger beetle (Heterobostrychus Auger aequalis) beetle, Heterobostrychus aequalis, Insects Pest Factsheet of Timber in Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Timber in Broken link Service: Asian subterranean Service, Asian subterranean termite (Coptotermes gestroi) termite, Coptotermes gestroi, Insects Pest Factsheet of Timber in Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Timber in Broken link Service: Formosan subterranean Service, Formosan termite (Coptotermes subterranean termite, formosanus) Coptotermes formosanus, Insects Pest Factsheet: Electric ants Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Electric Broken link ants, Insects Pest Factsheet: Chestnut blight Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Chestnut Broken link blight Pest Factsheet: Cocoa pod borer Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Cocoa pod Broken link borer, Insects Pest Factsheet: Khapra beetle Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Khapra Broken link beetle, Insects Pest Factsheet: Giant African Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Giant Broken link snail African snail, Insects Pest Factsheet: Asian longhorn Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Asian Broken link beetle longhorn beetle, Insects

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 28 Title of resource Proposed Tags Type Note category Pest Factsheet: Asian gypsy moth Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Asian Broken link gypsy moth, Insects Pest Factsheet: Plum pox Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Plum pox Broken link Pest Factsheet: Pine pitch canker Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Pine pitch Broken link canker Pest Factsheet: Karnal bunt Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Karnal Broken link bunt Pest Factsheet: Eucalyptus/guava Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Broken link rust Eucalyptus/guava rust Pest Factsheet: Sugarcane stem Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Sugarcane Broken link borer stem borer, Insects Pest Factsheet: Mango Pulp Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Mango Broken link weevil Pulp weevil, Insects Pest Factsheet: Exotic Fruit Flies Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Fruit fly, Broken link Insects Pest Factsheet: Citrus fruit borer Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Citrus fruit Broken link borer Pest Factsheet: Asian citrus Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Asian Broken link psyllid citrus psyllid Pest Factsheet: Fusarium wilt Pest Control Factsheet, Pestsm Fusarium Broken link wilt Pest Factsheet: Citrus greening Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Citrus Broken link disease greening disease Pest Factsheet: Citrus canker Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Citrus Broken link canker Pest Factsheet: Black Sigatoka Pest Control Factsheet, Pests, Black Broken link Sigatoka The South American Fruit Fly Information Fruit Fly, Anastrepha Link text Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied.); fraterculus (Wied.) malformed Advances in Artificial Rearing, Taxonomic Status and Biological Studies

WO4-T4 Report DRAFT 2 29