Crafts and Technologies of the Chalcolithic People of South Asia: an Overview

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Crafts and Technologies of the Chalcolithic People of South Asia: an Overview Indian Journal of History of Science, 50.1 (2015) 42-54 DOI: 10.16943/ijhs/2015/v50i1/48111 Crafts and Technologies of the Chalcolithic People of South Asia: An Overview Vasant Shinde and Shweta Sinha Deshpande* (Received 15 January 2015) Abstract The Chalcolithic or the Early Farming community flourished from 7000 BC to first millennium BC all over South Asia due to many factors, including climate change and population pressure. A large number of sites discovered and selected ones excavated have thrown flood of light on various aspects of their lifestyle, including crafts and technological advances made by these people. Most of the technologies were innovated due to sheer necessities. This paper discusses the evidence from excavated sites a variety of pyro and non-pyro technologies the Chalcolithic people introduced and used over such a long period. Key words: Ahar culture, Chalcolithic, Chalcolithic technology, Deccan, Jorwe culture, Kayatha culture, Northwest India, South Asia. 1. INTRODUCTION steady growth and gradual induction of complex Technology forms the most important technologies from time to time. The rate of aspect of any culture, as it is the gauge for technological change that took place until the assessing economic and social developments introduction of farming (the period of the Early within human society during its various phases of Farming communities is usually referred to as history. It is the systematic study of techniques either Neolithic in some regions or Chalcolithic (craft) for making and doing things; and is in other) was slow and spread over a long period concerned with the fabrication and use of artefacts. of time and was in response to only the most basic It has been defined as the application of scientific human needs; the search for food and shelter. The knowledge to the practical aims of human life or dates for the beginning of Early Farming can also be described as the change and communities differ from region to region. The manipulation of the human environment and thus Levant region, one of the most fertile regions of is a social phenomenon that cannot be the world in West Asia is evidently considered to disassociated from the society in which it exists. have witnessed the gradual process from Hunting- It has been suggested that ‘necessity is the mother Gathering to incipient agriculture sometime of all inventions’ and to some extent this has been towards the end of Pleistocene period and the projected through the various phases of history. beginning of the Holocene period around 12000 The introduction of technological aspects to 15000 years ago. The various technologies that can be seen right from the introduction of a stone were developed there began to spread in all tool in the Lower Palaeolithic times around three directions within the neighbouring and far off million years ago and since then there has been a regions and are believed to have come to the north- * Department of Archaeology, Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute, Deemed University, Pune, India. Email: [email protected] CRAFTS AND TECHNOLOGIES OF THE CHALCOLITHIC PEOPLE OF SOUTH ASIA 43 western part of the subcontinent through the Bolan was witnessed in parts of western India, southeast pass around 7000 BC. Rajasthan in the Banas River basin and the Mid- In the context of South Asia, till the Ganga regions. In the rest of India the development beginning of the twentieth century when the of village-based culture started in the later part of systematic research on Protohistoric cultures the Mesolithic phase and continued into the began, most historians were of the opinion that Neolithic and Chalcolithic between 3500 and 1000 settled life began in the Early Historic period BC. The declined phase of the Chalcolithic has around the 6th or 5th century BC with the period been properly studied at the site of Inamgaon in between the Stone Age and the Early Historic the Bhima basin of the lower Deccan region. Of period considered to be a “Dark Age”. However, the early farming communities that came into the discovery of the Harappan Civilization in the existence in different parts of South Asia, the 1920’s and Chalcolithic in the 1950’s pushed back Chalcolithic phases in Central India, the Deccan the antiquity of settled life in the sub-continent and the South India have been systematically by two thousand years at one stroke. This is studied, thanks to the pioneering work by Deccan considered to be the greatest archaeological College under the leadership of H.D. Sankalia. discovery in South Asia of the twentieth century. Unfortunately, the eastern and north-eastern parts The development and spread of agriculture and of the country have not been subjected to pastoralism in South Asia are complex phenomena systematic archaeological research and therefore that have taken place over the course of more than very little is known about these regions. 9000 years with the technological breakthroughs The large numbers of Chalcolithic cultures in pottery, metalworking, bead manufacturing, identified in the subcontinent have been classified monumental architecture, etc. into ten regional traditions: i. Baluchistan and adjoining regions (beginning 2. EARLY FARMING COMMUNITIES from 5th millennium BC) OF SOUTH ASIA ii. Padri and Prabhas Patan traditions of The Indian subcontinent has all the Saurashtra (4th millennium BC) favourable ecological conditions necessary to give th rise to the early farming communities, referred to iii. Anarta tradition of North Gujarat (4 as Neolithic or Chalcolithic. The region witnessed millennium BC) two independent streams of origin of village iv. Ganeshwar-Jodhpura of Northwest and economies with the associated technologies, which western Rajasthan (4th millennium BC) evolve and develop through the early phases of v. Ahar tradition of Mewar (4th millennium BC) village societies into the developed and mature complex villages and the early cities hence it is vi. Kayatha and Malwa traditions of the Malwa important to trace the ongoing cultural process in Plateau (3rd millennium BC) the region. On the basis of material culture and vii. Savalda and Jorwe traditions of the northern technologies in use, the Chalcolithic of South Asia Deccan (3rd millennium BC) has been sub-divided into Early, Mature and Late phases. The earlier beginnings (approximately viii.Neolithic/Chalcolithic traditions of eastern th around 7000 BC) are seen in the northwest regions India including Mid Ganga region (4 of Afghanistan and Baluchistan, possibly as a millennium BC) result of the influence coming from Southwest ix. Ochre Colour Pottery/Copper Hoard tradition Asia. Similar development slightly later in date of North India (3rd millennium BC) 44 INDIAN JOURNAL OF HISTORY OF SCIENCE x. Narahan culture of eastern Uttar Pradesh Neolithic around 6500 BC and copper during the (towards the end of 2nd millennium BC) Chalcolithic around 4500 BC. A number of local pre-Harappan Chalcolithic cultures such as the Each of these is characterised by similar Hakra, Kot Diji, Amri, Nal and Ahar follow and features with agro-pastoral economy, trade, social, all of them have contributed substantially to the political and economic stratification with minute development of the Harappan Civilization. differences in style of pottery manufacture and the level of technological development and the origin The regions of Mewar and the Mid Ganga and evolution of these techniques, which will be basin appear to have witnessed the process of discussed in the forthcoming paragraphs. domestication and formation of village life independently in the 6th millennium BC (Shinde The earliest evidence of agriculture and et al., 2004 and Tiwari, 2002-03). The Mesolithic pastoralism in South Asia comes from the site of site of Bagor in Mewar has produced evidence of Mehrgarh situated on the north Kachhi plain at early animal domestication and semi-permanent the foot of the Bolan Pass (Jarrige, 1984). The sedentary occupation (plant remains were not region includes the Kachhi plain at the mouth of recovered and studied from this site) from where Bolan pass, the Quetta valley, the Khozdar area begins the origin of a complex village organisation in the Kalat plateau, the Kotwa region, the Bela that spread into various parts of Rajasthan and area, the coastal plain of Sonmiani Bay and the Gujarat (Shinde, 2000; 2002 and Shinde et al., Turbat oasis. It is a buffer zone between the Iranian 2004). The site of Lahuradeva in the Mid Ganga Plateau and the Indus Basin and therefore basin has also provided similar kind of evidence significant from the point of the development of (Tiwari, 2002-03). The works at the site of Padri early village cultures which could have moved (Saurashtra), Nageshwar and Loteshwar (North west from the Iranian plateau as a result of Gujarat) and Balathal and Gilund in the Mewar agricultural viability. Barley-wheat cultivation and region of Rajasthan have provided evidence of cattle and sheep/goat domestication, similar to that early village life going back to the middle of 4th of West Asia, dominated the economy and hence millennium BC (Shinde, 1998; Sonawane and the foreign influence for the first villages within Ajithprasad, 1994). the subcontinent (particularly in the north-western) probably cannot be denied. The most impressive The early phase is characterised by small evidence of this early occupation was unearthed but growing complex communities which have at the site of Mehrgarh between 1974 and 1985 already realized the favourable factors of a (Jarrige, 1984; Jarrige et al., 1995). The Aceramic sedentary lifestyle along with a mixed economy Neolithic farmers first occupied the site around based on agriculture, animal husbandry and some 7000 BC, while the subsequent phases of the amount of hunting, gathering and fishing wherever Neolithic and Chalcolithic show a continuation possible. The basic technological breakthrough in and gradual development in the material culture, ceramic, smelting and melting of metals and culminating to form the Early Harappan phase artefact manufacture in the form of tools, utensils, (3000 BC).
Recommended publications
  • Mobility and Subsistence Strategies: a Case Study of Inamgaon) a Chalcolithic Site in Western India
    Mobility and Subsistence Strategies: A Case Study of Inamgaon) A Chalcolithic Site in Western India SHEENA PANJA ARCHAEOLOGY TODAY deals with being critical of our assumptions; being re­ flexive, relational, and contextual. The conclusions are always flexible and open to change as new relations emerge. It is impossible to approach the data without prejudice and without some general theory, but the aim is to evaluate such gen­ erality in relation to the contextual data. Our own understanding about human behavior acts as a generalization with which to understand the past. Nevertheless, we can agree that the past is objectively organized in contexts that are different from our own. The internal archaeological evidence then forces us to consider whether the past subject we are dealing with is familiar to us or makes us rethink deep-seated presuppositions about the nature of human behavior. The objective component of archaeological data means that the archaeologist can be confronted with a past that is different from the present. It is this guarded objectivity of the material "other" that provides the basis of critique. It is thus a hermeneutical pro­ cedure that involves a dialectical interplay between our own understandings and the forms of life we are seeking to understand. It is an ongoing dialogue between the past and the present in which the outcome resides wholly in neither side but is a product of both (Hodder 1991; Hodder et al. 1995; Wylie 1989). It is with these ideas in mind that this article is aimed to analyze critically certain categories archaeologists use to understand human behavior in a dialectical effort to understand the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsistence Strategies and Burial Rituals: Social Practices in the Late Deccan Chalcolithic
    Subsistence Strategies and Burial Rituals: Social Practices in the Late Deccan Chalcolithic TERESA P. RACZEK IN THE SECOND MILLENNIUM B.C., THE RESIDENTS OF THE WESTERN DECCAN region of India practiced an agropastoral lifestyle and buried their infant children in ceramic urns below their house floors. With the coming of the first millennium B.C., the inhabitants of the site of Inamgaon altered their subsistence practices to incorporate more wild meat and fewer grains into their diet. Although daily practices in the form of food procurement changed, infant burial practices remained constant from the Early Jorwe (1400 B.c.-lOOO B.C.) to the Late Jorwe (1000 B.c.-700 B.C.) period. Examining interments together with subsistence strategies firmly situates ideational practices within the fabric of daily life. This paper will explore the relationship between change and continuity in burial and subsistence practices around 1000 B.C. at the previously excavated Cha1colithic site of Inamgaon in the western Deccan (Fig. 1). By considering the act of burial as a moment of social construction that both creates and reflects larger traditions, it is possible to understand how each individual interment affects chronological variability. That burial traditions at Inamgaon were continuously recreated in the face of a changing society suggests that meaningful and significant practices were actively upheld. Burial practices at Inamgaon were both structured and fluid enough to allow room for individual and group expression. The con­ temporaneous variability that occurs in the burial record at Inamgaon may reflect the marking of various aspects of personhood. Burial traditions and the ability and desire of the living to conforITl to them vary over time and it is important to consider the specific social context in which they occur.
    [Show full text]
  • (Social Sciences) Ancient Indian History Culture
    PUNYASHLOK AHILYADEVI HOLKAR SOLAPUR UNIVERSITY, SOLAPUR Faculty of Humanities (Social Sciences) Ancient Indian History Culture and Archaeology M.A. Part I Semester I & II w.e.f. June, 2020 1 Punyashlok Ahilyadevi Holkar Solapur University, Solapur School of Social Sciences Dept. of Ancient Indian History Culture and Archaeology M.A. Part-I CBCS Pattern (New)w.e.f. June 2020 Marks : 100 (70+30) SEMESTER -I AIHCA Hard Core HCT 1.1 History of Ancient India up to 650 A.D. HCT 1.2 Ancient Indian Iconography HCT 1.3 Prehistory of India Soft Core (Anyone) SCT 1.1 Introduction to Archaeology SCT 1.2 Ancient Indian Literature Practical/Field Work/Tutorial HCP 1.1 Practical/Field Work-I SCP 1.2 Practical/Field Work-II Tutorials (Library Work) Note: - 70Marks for theory paper & 30 Marks on Class room Seminars/ Study Tour/ Tutorials/ Field Work/ Project. 2 Punyashlok Ahilyadevi Holkar Solapur University, Solapur School of Social Sciences, Dept. of Ancient Indian History Culture and Archaeology M.A. Part-I, Semester-I CBCS Pattern (New)w.e.f. June 2020 Marks : 100 (70+30) HCT-1.1 History of Ancient India Up to 650 AD 70 Unit- 1: Sources and Historiography of Ancient India i)Geography ii)Historiography iii) Sources of Ancient Indian History Unit 2: Early of political institutions in ancient India i. Janapadas, Republic (Ganrajya) , Mahajanapadas in ancient India ii. Rise of Magadha Empire iii. Persian and Greek Invasions: Causes and Impacts Unit 3: Mauryan and Post-Mauryan India i. Chandragupta Maurya and Bindusara ii. Ashoka, his successors and decline of the Mauryas iii.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEXURE H-2 Notice for Appointment of Regular / Rural Retail Outlet Dealerships Indian Oil Corporation Limited Proposes to Appo
    ANNEXURE H-2 Notice for appointment of Regular / Rural Retail Outlet Dealerships Indian Oil Corporation Limited proposes to appoint Retail Outlet dealers in Maharashtra, as per following details: SL No Name of location Revenue Type of RO Estimated Category Type of Minimum Dimension (in Finance to be Mode of Fixed Securit District monthly Site* M.)/Area of the site (in Sq. M.). arranged by Selection Fee / y Sales * the applicant Minimu Deposi Potential # m Bid t amount 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9a 9b 10 11 12 Regular / MS+HSD in SC CC / DC / Frontage Depth Area Estim Estimat Draw of Rural Kls CFS ated ed fund Lots / work require Bidding SC CC-1 ing d for SC CC-2 capit develo SC PH al pment ST requi of ST CC-1 reme infrastru ST CC-2 nt for cture at ST PH oper RO OBC ation OBC CC-1 of RO OBC CC-2 OBC PH OPEN OPEN CC-1 OPEN CC-2 OPEN PH 1 Neral on Karjat-Neral Road Regular 200 SC CFS 30 30 900 0 0 Draw of 0 3 lots Raigad 2 On Pali Vikramgarh Road Regular 190 SC CFS 30 30 900 0 0 Draw of 0 3 Thane lots 3 Thal to Mandve Regular 150 SC CFS 30 30 900 0 0 Draw of 0 3 Raigad lots 4 Palghar char rasta to Umroli on Boisar Road Regular 250 SC CFS 30 30 900 0 0 Draw of 0 3 Palghar lots 5 Within 10 kms from Saikheda, on Karanjgaon to Regular 120 SC CFS 30 30 900 0 0 Draw of 0 3 Nandurmadmeshwar Road Nashik lots 6 WITHIN 10 KMS FROM MANMAD TOWARDS Regular 100 SC CFS 30 30 900 0 0 Draw of 0 3 NANDGAON ON SH-25 Nashik lots 7 SATURLI ON GHOTI -TRAMBAK ROAD SH-29 Regular 150 SC CFS 30 30 900 0 0 Draw of 0 3 Nashik lots 8 On NH-548A (Karjat-Murbad Road) from Karjat
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Note: Page numbers in italics refer to figures and tables. 16R dune site, 36, 43, 440 Adittanallur, 484 Adivasi peoples see tribal peoples Abhaipur, 498 Adiyaman dynasty, 317 Achaemenid Empire, 278, 279 Afghanistan Acharyya, S.K., 81 in “Aryan invasion” hypothesis, 205 Acheulean industry see also Paleolithic era in history of agriculture, 128, 346 in Bangladesh, 406, 408 in human dispersals, 64 dating of, 33, 35, 38, 63 in isotope analysis of Harappan earliest discovery of, 72 migrants, 196 handaxes, 63, 72, 414, 441 skeletal remains found near, 483 in the Hunsgi and Baichbal valleys, 441–443 as source of raw materials, 132, 134 lack of evidence in northeastern India for, 45 Africa major sites of, 42, 62–63 cultigens from, 179, 347, 362–363, 370 in Nepal, 414 COPYRIGHTEDhominoid MATERIAL migrations to and from, 23, 24 in Pakistan, 415 Horn of, 65 related hominin finds, 73, 81, 82 human migrations from, 51–52 scholarship on, 43, 441 museums in, 471 Adam, 302, 334, 498 Paleolithic tools in, 40, 43 Adamgarh, 90, 101 research on stature in, 103 Addanki, 498 subsistence economies in, 348, 353 Adi Badri, 498 Agara Orathur, 498 Adichchanallur, 317, 498 Agartala, 407 Adilabad, 455 Agni Purana, 320 A Companion to South Asia in the Past, First Edition. Edited by Gwen Robbins Schug and Subhash R. Walimbe. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 0002649130.indd 534 2/17/2016 3:57:33 PM INDEX 535 Agra, 337 Ammapur, 414 agriculture see also millet; rice; sedentism; water Amreli district, 247, 325 management Amri,
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 10 Chalcolithic and Early Iron Age-I
    UNIT 10 CHALCOLITHIC AND EARLY IRON AGE-I Structure 10.0 Objectives 10.1 Introduction 10.2 Ochre Coloured Pottery Culture 10.3 The Problems of Copper Hoards 10.4 Black and Red Ware Culture 10.5 Painted Grey Ware Culture 10.6 Northern Black Polished Ware Culture 10.6.1 Structures 10.6.2 Pottery 10.6.3 Other Objects 10.6.4 Ornaments 10.6.5 Terracotta Figurines 10.6.6 Subsistence Economy and Trade 10.7 Chalcolithic Cultures of Western, Central and Eastern India 10.7.1 Pottery: Diagnostic Features 10.7.2 Economy 10.7.3 Houses and Habitations 10.7.4 Other 'characteristics 10.7.5 Religion/Belief Systems 10.7.6 Social Organization 10.8 Let Us Sum Up 10.9 Key Words 10.10 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises 10.0 OBJECTIVES In Block 2, you have learnt about'the antecedent stages and various aspects of Harappan culture and society. You have also read about its geographical spread and the reasons for its decline and diffusion. In this unit we shall learn about the post-Harappan, Chalcolithic, and early Iron Age Cultures of northern, western, central and eastern India. After reading this unit you will be able to know about: a the geographical location and the adaptation of the people to local conditions, a the kind of houses they lived in, the varieties of food they grew and the kinds of tools and implements they used, a the varietie of potteries wed by them, a the kinds of religious beliefs they had, and a the change occurring during the early Iron age.
    [Show full text]
  • The Decline of Harappan Civilization K.N.DIKSHIT
    The Decline of Harappan Civilization K.N.DIKSHIT EBSTRACT As pointed out by N. G. Majumdar in 1934, a late phase of lndus civilization is illustrated by pottery discovered at the upper levels of Jhukar and Mohenjo-daro. However, it was the excavation at Rangpur which revealed in stratification a general decline in the prosperity of the Harappan culture. The cultural gamut of the nuclear region of the lndus-Sarasvati divide, when compared internally, revealed regional variations conforming to devolutionary tendencies especially in the peripheral region of north and western lndia. A large number of sites, now loosely termed as 'Late Harappan/Post-urban', have been discovered. These sites, which formed the disrupted terminal phases of the culture, lost their status as Harappan. They no doubt yielded distinctive Harappan pottery, antiquities and remnants of some architectural forms, but neither town planning nor any economic and cultural nucleus. The script also disappeared. ln this paper, an attempt is made with the survey of some of these excavated sites and other exploratory field-data noticed in the lndo-Pak subcontinent, to understand the complex issue.of Harappan decline and its legacy. CONTENTS l.INTRODUCTION 2. FIELD DATA A. Punjab i. Ropar ii. Bara iii. Dher Majra iv. Sanghol v. Katpalon vi. Nagar vii. Dadheri viii. Rohira B. Jammu and Kashmir i. Manda C. Haryana i. Mitathal ii. Daulatpur iii. Bhagwanpura iv. Mirzapur v. Karsola vi. Muhammad Nagar D. Delhi i. Bhorgarh 125 ANCiENT INDlA,NEW SERIES,NO.1 E.Western Uttar Pradesh i.Hulas il.Alamgirpur ili.Bargaon iv.Mandi v Arnbkheri v:.Bahadarabad F.Guiarat i.Rangpur †|.Desalpur ili.Dhola宙 ra iv Kanmer v.」 uni Kuran vi.Ratanpura G.Maharashtra i.Daimabad 3.EV:DENCE OF RICE 4.BURIAL PRACTiCES 5.DiSCUSS10N 6.CLASSiFiCAT10N AND CHRONOLOGY 7.DATA FROM PAKISTAN 8.BACTRIA―MARGIANAARCHAEOLOGICAL COMPLEX AND LATE HARAPPANS 9.THE LEGACY 10.CONCLUS10N ・ I.
    [Show full text]
  • Pincode Officename Mumbai G.P.O. Bazargate S.O M.P.T. S.O Stock
    pincode officename districtname statename 400001 Mumbai G.P.O. Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400001 Bazargate S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400001 M.P.T. S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400001 Stock Exchange S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400001 Tajmahal S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400001 Town Hall S.O (Mumbai) Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400002 Kalbadevi H.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400002 S. C. Court S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400002 Thakurdwar S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400003 B.P.Lane S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400003 Mandvi S.O (Mumbai) Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400003 Masjid S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400003 Null Bazar S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400004 Ambewadi S.O (Mumbai) Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400004 Charni Road S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400004 Chaupati S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400004 Girgaon S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400004 Madhavbaug S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400004 Opera House S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400005 Colaba Bazar S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400005 Asvini S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400005 Colaba S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400005 Holiday Camp S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400005 V.W.T.C. S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400006 Malabar Hill S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400007 Bharat Nagar S.O (Mumbai) Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400007 S V Marg S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400007 Grant Road S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400007 N.S.Patkar Marg S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400007 Tardeo S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400008 Mumbai Central H.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400008 J.J.Hospital S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400008 Kamathipura S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400008 Falkland Road S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400008 M A Marg S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400009 Noor Baug S.O Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400009 Chinchbunder S.O
    [Show full text]
  • Article Discuss the Issue While Unfolding the Scope and Development of Human Skeletal Studies in India
    Ind. J. Phys. Anthrop. & Hum. Genet. Vol. 34. No. 2, (2015) : 283-300 AN OVERVIEW ON DEVELOPMENT OF PALAEOPATHOLOGY IN THE INDIAN SUB-CONTINENT Veena Mushrif-Tripathy and Ruokuonuo Rose Yhome ABSTRACT “Our basic research interest is to reconstruct biological dynamics of earlier living human populations and clearly a sample of dead people is not the same as a sample of living people. What is less clear is how significant this difference is and what mechanisms can be used or developed to minimize the effect of this difference on the interpretation of our data (Ortner, 2003) BACKGROUND Palaeopathology essentially can be defined as the study of (logos) ancient (palaeo) suffering (pathos) in both humans and other animals. It is a discipline that aims to trace the origin, evolution and history of disease over long periods of time through pathological changes which represent diseases suffered in life and observed in human remains buried at archaeological sites (Fig. 1). Other definitions of Palaeopathology includes; ‘Investigation of the disease affecting human ancient population for better understanding of the process of human adaptation led to the development of palaeopathology which is also considered as a holistic study of humans in their physical environment’ (Roberts and Manchester 1995). ‘Paleopathology encompasses the study of disease, both human and nonhuman, in antiquity using a variety of different sources including human mummified and skeletal remains, ancient documents, illustrations from early books, painting and sculpture from the past, and analysis of coprolites’ (Ortner 2003: 23). The term palaeopathology was first implemented by Shufeldt in 1892, which literally explain as ‘ancient suffering’.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 3 Harappan Civilisation and Other Chalcolithic Cultures
    Introductory UNIT 3 HARAPPAN CIVILISATION AND OTHER CHALCOLITHIC CULTURES Structure 3.0 Introduction 3.1 The Background 3.2 The Harappan Culture 3.3 Urbanism 3.4 State Structure 3.5 Social Structure 3.6 End of the Harappan Civilization 3.7 Other Chalcolithic Cultures 3.8 Summary 3.9 Glossary 3.10 Exercises 3.11 Suggested Readings 3.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Unit is to investigate more complex social structures than those covered in the previous Unit. This complexity arises due to the emergence of the state in the 3rd millennium BC. This early state is an inchoate one, incorporating many elements of tribal societies. This Bronze Age state is also quite different from the states of later periods, in no small measure due to the lack of commoditisation and coined money in this period. That this period also witnessed the first experiments in urbanism in the subcontinent adds to its complexity. These developments were basically confined to the North-western parts of the subcontinent and one must be aware that other socio-political structures, like band, tribal or chiefship level societies, may have existed contemporaneously in this and other areas. So far, we have seen incipient stages of social development, encompassing the band and tribal levels. In this Unit, we will discuss the other two stages of development, namely chiefdom (or chiefship) and state. Structurally, the chiefdom resembles the tribal level with the beginnings of social stratification, a political office and redistributive economy. On the other hand, there is a marked difference between tribal or chiefdom and state societies.
    [Show full text]
  • Chalcolithic Cultures of India
    4/1/2020 .The discovery of the Chalcolithic culture at Jorwe in 1950 opened a new phase in the prehistory of the Deccan. Chalcolithic Cultures of India .Since then a large number of Chalcolithic habitation sites have been discovered as a result of systematic exploration not only in the Deccan but also in other parts of the country bringing to light several regional Hkkjr dh rkezik’kkf.kd laLd`fr;k¡ cultures. .Large scale excavations have been conducted at Ahar and Navadatoli, both are Chalcolithic sites. .Most of these cultures are post Harappa, a few like Kayatha are contemporaneous Harappa. .An important feature is their painted pottery, usually black-on-red. Dr. Anil Kumar .The people subsisted on farming, stock-raising, hunting and fishing. .They used copper on restricted scale as the metal was scarce. Professor .They were all rural culture. Ancient Indian History and Archaeology .It is enigmatic that most of these settlements were deserted by the end University of Lucknow 2nd millennium B.C. [email protected] .The Chalcolithic cultures such as Ahar, Kayatha, Malwa, and Jorwe are [email protected] discussed further. Kayatha Culture Out of over 40 sites of Kayatha Culture, two of them namely Kayatha and Dangwada have been excavated. This Chalcolithic culture was named after the type site Kayatha, in Ujjain dist., Madhya Pradesh. The excavation was due to the joint collaboration of Deccan College, Pune and Department of Ancient Indian History, Culture and Archaeology, Vikram University, Ujjain. They lived in small huts having well-rammed floors. The main ceramics of Kayatha- Chocolate-slipped, incised, sturdy and well baked Kayatha ware.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Farming Communities 4.?
    J i Chapter lY O f EARLY FARMING COMMUNITIES 4.? r":; iia£Lx„..ya,rg>4aa ■^.9avmn,4>Uaa Since the accidental discovery of the Jorv/e culture at Jorwe (Tal« ■^angamner, Udat* Ahmednagax'} in 1950» extensive explorations vfere undertaken in different parts of iiaharashtra vrith a view to locate sites of the chalco- lithic period* As a result, more than 200 chalcolithic sites have been discovered to date, ilielr distributional pattern suggests 'Uiat the settlemaits of these early formers were spread almost all over Ilaharaahtrat except parts of Vidarbha and the coaatal region. The antiquity of the early farmers in Maharashtra oan be stretched back to the opening Hhe. of^2nd millenniaa B»C, A casual glance at the distribution of chalcolithic sites in Maharashtra gives a fairly good idea of the distribution pattern of their settlamenta. 43 /iost of the early t:\r.wing settleaents aro located in the black cotton soil region. Throe major valleysf the Tapi, the Uociavari and the t^aa n/ere occupied, but there is a significant difference in the concentration of settlssacsnts. The Tapi valley encouraged a heavy concentration of settle­ ments, followed by the Ctodavari valley. There were sporadic aettleaanva in the Bhita^i valley* iiach of these valleys had at least one site vdiich was the largest in the area* i’here was ?rakashe in the Tapi, iiairaabad in the Godavari and Injvasaon in the Bhima valley (Jtiavalikar 1979: 252). ihe obvious reason for the variation in the distribution pattern in each valleys is variation in availability of arable land and perennial source of water.
    [Show full text]