DOCSLIB.ORG

USAF Counterproliferation Center CPC Outreach Journal #187

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
USAF Counterproliferation Center CPC Outreach Journal #187 #187 31 July 2002 USAF COUNTERPROLIFERATION CENTER CPC OUTREACH JOURNAL Air University Air War College Maxwell AFB, Alabama Welcome to the CPC Outreach Journal. As part of USAF Counterproliferation Center’s mission to counter weapons of mass destruction through education and research, we’re providing our government and civilian community a source for timely counterproliferation information. This information includes articles, papers and other documents addressing issues pertinent to US military response options for dealing with nuclear, biological and chemical threats and attacks. It’s our hope this information resource will help enhance your counterproliferation issue awareness. Established here at the Air War College in 1998, the USAF/CPC provides education and research to present and future leaders of the Air Force, as well as to members of other branches of the armed services and Department of Defense. Our purpose is to help those agencies better prepare to counter the threat from weapons of mass destruction. Please feel free to visit our web site at www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc-cps.htm for in-depth information and specific points of contact. Please direct any questions or comments on CPC Outreach Journal to Lt Col Michael W. Ritz, ANG Special Assistant to Director of CPC or Jo Ann Eddy, CPC Outreach Editor, at (334) 953-7538 or DSN 493-7538. To subscribe, change e-mail address, or unsubscribe to this journal or to request inclusion on the mailing list for CPC publications, please contact Mrs. Eddy. The following articles, papers or documents do not necessarily reflect official endorsement of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or other US government agencies. Reproduction for private use or commercial gain is subject to original copyright restrictions. All rights are reserved CONTENTS At anthrax base, 'space suits' and haze of suspicion Iraq seeks steel for nukes Fails so far to buy equipment Rumsfeld Says Destroying Nuclear Warheads Is Irresponsible, Despite Security Concerns Rumsfeld: Arms Reduction Treaty’s Simplicity And Flexibility Fit New Realities Scientists Worry Journals May Aid Terrorists Argentine To Head Group Seeking To Ban Chemical Weapons Senate Panel Backs Chemical Safeguards Army Aims to Correct Anthrax Methods Iran's Emerging Nuclear Plant Poses Test For U.S. Russia Will Submit Bids To Supply Iran Reactors Russian Nuclear Forces, 2002 Link Possible Between Some Anthrax Vaccine, Symptoms Rumsfeld Says Air Strikes Won't Disarm Iraq Iraq Chemical, Biological Weapons Elusive Target, Rumsfeld Says Air Power Alone Can’t Defeat Iraq, Rumsfeld Asserts In Assessing Iraq's Arsenal, The 'Reality Is Uncertainty' Rumsfeld Targets Saddam, But Not Other 'Axis' Regimes U.S. Moves To Head Off Russia-Iran Nuke Pact At anthrax base, 'space suits' and haze of suspicion BY FAYE BOWERS | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor FT. DETRICK, MD. – Col. Erik Henchal can't wait to begin. Before he's even finished striding from his desk to a conference table, he launches into a tirade – without provocation – on his lab's mission. That mission, he says, is defensive. Henchal and his fellow scientists at the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases – known by the ungainly acronym USAMRIID – have long been the nation's chief line of defense against anthrax and other, more deadly viruses. For 32 years, USAMRIID has delved into the secrets of the deadliest bugs known to humankind, all in the name of developing vaccines, detection methods, and other countermeasures. But then came last year's deadly string of anthrax letters in the US – just the sort of attack this lab aims to prevent. Worse, it turns out that the bugs used in the envelopes were derived from a strain developed here in the 1980s. In fact, the FBI is now focusing its search for the anthrax culprit among past and current USAMRIID workers. Once they were silent heroes. Now, they're possibly dangerous saboteurs. No one here is immune from scrutiny – not even the commander. "Oh yes, I've been questioned," says the red-faced Col. Henchal, seated in his office during a rare interview. The FBI has questioned all of the scientists here at this huge, low tan building about a hour north of Washington. Some have been interrogated more than once. Several have been polygraphed. And at least one, sometimes two, FBI agents are on the premises every day. Henchal was interrogated like everyone else because he had access to the lab rooms where anthrax was present. "No one wants the perpetrator to be caught more than USAMRIID.... The best thing for the FBI to do is to remove all reasonable doubt," he says, "We have gotten used to the enhanced oversight." The military set up USAMRIID in the early 1970s, shortly after President Nixon ordered the US offensive biological weapons program to close. Today, USAMRIID employs 650 people. About 125 are scientists with doctoral degrees, mainly in virology, microbiology, and veterinary medicine. The work they do here, Henchal says, is critical to America's national security. He says more than 20 countries already have biological warfare capabilities, and are working on methods of disbursing them. At least 10 other countries are developing them. Then there's the threat from terror groups. A dangerous line of work Currently, scientists at USAMRIID have diagnostics – the capability to quickly identify – some 85 agents; it's their priority to develop countermeasures against 40 of those. And they are currently in various stages of working on vaccine development programs for 10, including anthrax, and the Ebola and Marburg viruses. "We know the Russians were looking at weaponizing Marburg," Henchal says. The labs where USAMARIID does this very dangerous work are reached from the office suites through a long, tan wallpapered hall and a metal door that opens only after a worker scans a magnetic identification card. Ahead are labyrinthine halls and labs – 50,000 square feet at biosafety level 3, where agents like anthrax, plague, and Venezuelan equine encephalitis are studied, and the 10,000 square feet at biosafety level 4, where research is done with the most deadly agents, like Ebola and Marburg. To get into any of those, the worker needs to re-enter the magnetic card, along with a four-digit number that's only issued after the worker has been immunized against that particular bug. The doors are also keyed in to central security, so there is a master list of who enters and exits the labs. Lisa Hensley splits her time between developing treatments and more effective vaccines for Ebola at USAMRIID and smallpox at the Center for Disease Control in Atlanta. The work is carried out in the biosafety level 4 suites. She enters an outer area, where she strips off her street clothes and shoes and dons hospital-like scrubs and socks. Then, she puts on what they call a blue "space suit," a 12-pound pressurized and ventilated suit that provides filtered breathing air. After she enters the actual lab – a small, square cinderblock room lined with petri dishes, incubators, centrifuges, pipets, an inverted microscope, and other scientific paraphernalia – she plugs in her lifeline – a yellow, spiral air hose that hangs from the ceiling. The actual work – growing cell cultures, infecting them, observing what proteins come out of those cells, then injecting animals with the bug – usually takes two to five years, Dr. Hensley says. She's worked at USAMRIID for four years; she came here as a post doctoral fellow and stayed. She says the work is not only vital to the biodefense of this country, but part of the larger public health picture. "That's what drives us to put in as many hours as we do." On the smallpox project, where she divides her time between this lab and the Center for Disease Control labs in Atlanta, she puts in an average of 60 to 80 hours per week. When the scientists at this lab worked to identify the anthrax bacteria from the letters mailed last fall, scientists here put in 100-hour weeks. Some slept in their cars, others in their labs. "Between 11 Sept. and May, USAMRIID processed over 31,000 samples and 260,000 assays in our forensic-based lab." Henchal says. Under normal conditions, they process four to six samples per month. Questions for everybody Hensley wasn't interrogated, because she didn't work on the anthrax letters project. But she did receive a call from the FBI because she had been inoculated against the disease. Everyone who had access to inoculation has at least been questioned. "I understand that any lab involved in this type of work would naturally be suspect," Hensley says. "From a personal point of view, though, I think it was very difficult. These scientists' hearts are in the right place. We could go someplace else and make a lot of money." Many others agree with this assessment. David Franz, former commander of USAMRIID says he left four years ago "with tears running down my chin." He, as well as many others in the scientific community, say the scientists at USAMRIID are unfairly taking heat. They point out that the Ames strain of the anthrax virus was developed and worked on here. But it's also been sent out to at least five other laboratories. "If some scientist wanted to work on anthrax in a university, they could get it," Dr. Franz says. Moreover, "any country with first-rate science could have this," says Joseph Foxell, director of information security for New York City. He lists several that are capable: almost all of the European countries, Japan, Israel, Egypt, and Pakistan. Maybe Iraq. http://www.csmonitor.com/search_content/0725/p01s01-usmi.html (Return to Contents) July 26, 2002 Iraq seeks steel for nukes Fails so far to buy equipment By Bill Gertz THE WASHINGTON TIMES Iraq's government is trying to buy special equipment used in producing fuel for nuclear weapons, The Washington Times has learned.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (CUWS) Outreach Journal #1162
    USAF Center for Unconventional Weapons Studies (CUWS) Outreach Journal Issue No. 1162, 24 April 2015 Welcome to the CUWS Outreach Journal! As part of the CUWS’ mission to develop Air Force, DoD, and other USG leaders to advance the state of knowledge, policy, and practices within strategic defense issues involving nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons, we offer the government and civilian community a source of contemporary discussions on unconventional weapons. These discussions include news articles, papers, and other information sources that address issues pertinent to the U.S. national security community. It is our hope that this information resource will help enhance the overall awareness of these important national security issues and lead to the further discussion of options for dealing with the potential use of unconventional weapons. All of our past journals are now available at http://cpc.au.af.mil/au_outreach.aspx.” The following news articles, papers, and other information sources do not necessarily reflect official endorsement of the Air University, U.S. Air Force, or Department of Defense. Reproduction for private use or commercial gain is subject to original copyright restrictions. All rights are reserved. FEATURE ITEM: “Russian Nuclear Forces, 2015”. Authored by Hans M. Kristensen and Robert S. Norris; published by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists; 14 April 2015; 14 pages. http://bos.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/04/13/0096340215581363.full.pdf+html Russia is modernizing its strategic and nonstrategic nuclear warheads. It currently has 4,500 nuclear warheads, of which roughly 1,780 strategic warheads are deployed on missiles and at bomber bases.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Stock WORLDWIDE NUCLEAR DEPLOYMENTS 1998
    Taking Stock WORLDWIDE NUCLEAR DEPLOYMENTS 1998 BY William M. Arkin Robert S. Norris Joshua Handler NRDC Nuclear Program MARCH 1998 NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. 1200 New York Ave., NW, Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20005 202/289-6868 VOICE 802-457-3426 (Arkin) 202-289-2369 (Norris) FAX 202-289-1060 INTERNET [email protected] [email protected] Worldwide Nuclear Deployments 1998 i © Copyright, Natural Resources Defense Council, 1998 ii TAKING STOCK Table of Contents Introduction . 1 Methodology . 4 Arms Control and Nuclear Weapons Deployments . 6 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I) . 6 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START II) . 7 The Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty . 8 Unilateral Initiatives . 8 Future Nuclear Deployments . 11 The United States . 14 Nuclear History . 16 Nuclear Organization . 19 Nuclear Weapons Deployments . 24 Russia . 26 Nuclear Organization . 29 Nuclear Weapons Deployments . 33 Britain . 39 France . 42 China . 45 Appendix A: Locations of U.S. Nuclear Weapons, by Type . 53 Appendix B: U.S. Nuclear Weapons by Location . 55 Appendix C: U.S. Nuclear Weapons, Location Profiles . 56 By State California . 56 Colorado . 57 Georgia. 58 Louisiana . 59 Missouri . 60 Montana . 61 Nebraska . 61 Nevada . 62 New Mexico. 63 North Dakota . 65 Texas . 68 Virginia . 70 Washington . 70 Wyoming . 72 Overseas by Country Belgium . 72 Germany . 73 Greece . 76 Italy . 77 The Netherlands . 78 Turkey . 78 United Kingdom . 79 Appendix D: Location of Russian Nuclear Weapons, by Type . 81 Appendix E: Russian Nuclear Weapons by Location . 84 Appendix F: British Nuclear Weapons by Type and Location . 88 Appendix G: French Nuclear Weapons by Type and Location .
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Civilisational Aspects of Russian Soft Power in Contemporary Ukraine
    A STUDY OF THE CIVILISATIONAL ASPECTS OF RUSSIAN SOFT POWER IN CONTEMPORARY UKRAINE by VICTORIA ANN HUDSON A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Russian and East European Studies (CREES) School of Government of Society College of Social Sciences University of Birmingham January 2013 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis contributes to an in-depth understanding of the concept of soft power, which according to Joseph Nye indicates the ability to achieve foreign policy goals through cultural attraction. For the purposes of this study of Russian cultural influence in Ukraine, soft power is rearticulated to highlight the ability to engage in mean-making and cultural- ideational leadership on the international stage. A critique of Nye justifies a reframing of soft power, which is supplied by drawing on the analytical power of post-Marxist hegemony and discourse theory. The methodology through which this concept is operationalised empirically emphasises outcomes over inputs, thus appraisals of soft power must account for whether the discourses promoted by mean-making initiatives resonate favourably with target audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Federation
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights RUSSIAN FEDERATION STATE DUMA ELECTIONS 18 September 2016 OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission Final Report Warsaw 23 December 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................... 3 III. BACKGROUND AND POLITICAL CONTEXT ............................................................................... 4 IV. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................................... 5 V. ELECTORAL SYSTEM ....................................................................................................................... 6 VI. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ....................................................................................................... 7 VII. VOTER REGISTRATION .................................................................................................................... 9 VIII. CANDIDATE REGISTRATION ........................................................................................................ 10 IX. CAMPAIGN ......................................................................................................................................... 12 X. CAMPAIGN FINANCE .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Party System in Russia's Regions Since 2003
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-2012 Institutional Engineering in a Managed Democracy: The Party System in Russia’s Regions Since 2003 Christian Alexander Peyton [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Part of the Comparative Politics Commons, and the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Peyton, Christian Alexander, "Institutional Engineering in a Managed Democracy: The Party System in Russia’s Regions Since 2003" (2012). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1538 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Peyton 1 Institutional Engineering in a Managed Democracy: The Party System in Russia’s Regions Since 2003 Christian Alexander Peyton Peyton 2 Abstract After a decade of near-total relegation to the political sidelines in regional governments, political parties in Russia's regions became prominent actors following reforms under President Vladimir Putin. President Putin's reforms were directed at both the supply and demand side of the electoral market. By mandating that 50% of regional legislative seats be reserved for political parties, political parties became viable electoral vehicles for politicians. Concurrently, Putin regulated the supply of parties by raising membership requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Essay: China's New Defense White Paper
    Foreign Military Studies Office OE WATCH FOREIGN NEWS & PERSPECTIVES OF THE OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT Special Essay: China’s New Defense White Paper The Diversified Employment of China’s Armed Forces: Have We Really Learned Anything? Vol. 3 Issue #7 July 2013 IN THIS ISSUE Click on a link below RUSSIA 31 Dissension in Daraa CHINA 3 Contracted Logistics: A Russian 32 The Post-Qusayr Stage 47 ‘Peace Ark’ Ahoy: Perspective on Military Outsourcing 47 The PLA’s Growing Focus on Military 9 How Turkish Protests Influence Russian AFRICA Diplomacy Demonstrations— on 12 June and Beyond 35 Forget Earlier Rebuke: Western Alliances 48 A PLA Cyber “Rules of the Road” Proposal 11 Moscow and Tehran’s Complex with Chad’s President to Fight Terrorism in 49 China Develops Another Top Partnership Mali Supercomputer But Claim They Have a 14 Chechens Fighting with Syrian 37 South African “NObama” Campaign to Long Way To Go Opposition? Protest U.S. Military and Foreign Policy 50 China’s Investment in the U.S. Goes 16 Red Star Symbol Returns 38 Tensions Rise in Mozambique Along Civil Beyond U.S. Treasuries 17 Reducing Tank Inventory War Lines 19 Prospects for Military Recruitment KOREA 21 War’s Unchanging Nature SOUTHEAST ASIA 51 Chinese View of North Korean WMD 23 Ukraine-China Military Collaboration 39 Indo-Pacific Asia - Food Security and “GMO” CENTRAL ASIA TURKEY 53 The Development of Uzbekistan’s Special 25 Protests Directed at Erdoğan’s LATIN AMERICA Forces Authoritarian Style 42 Peasant Reservations? 54 The Naval Capabilities of Kazakhstan’s 27 Al Nusra
    [Show full text]
  • Between Political Apathy and Political Passivity. the Case of Modern Russian Society
    Torun Internaonal Studies No. 1 (7) 2014 2019, No. 1 (12), pp. 109–123 Published online December, 2019 DOI: hp://dx.doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2019.007 Maryana Prokop*1 ORCID: 0000-0003-0135-863X Arleta Hrehorowicz**2 ORCID: 0000-0003-1656-5252 BETWEEN POLITICAL APATHY AND POLITICAL PASSIVITY. THE CASE OF MODERN RUSSIAN SOCIETY ABSTRACT It is safest to remain agnostic as to whether the Russian society is completely active or passive. What counts in favour of the former view is the high voter turnout, whereas a low level of involvement in political life should make us rather incline towards the latter. The research fo- cuses on determining the extent of activity/passivity of the Russian society in the years 2000– 2012. The results of the analysis revealed a degree of participation of the Russian citizens in the electoral decision-making process and their involvement in political life. It constituted an answer to the question: to what extent Russian legislation allows society to participate in the political life, by estimating a political activity index (Wap(ap)). Additionally, the political ac- tivity correlate index (Wap(k)) was checked, which enables us to correct the obtained result on the basis of legal provisions according to the real dimension of the Russian political activity. Keywords: political absenteeism, political apathy, social anomie, civic passivity, Russian society 1. INTRODUCTION It is difficult to characterize the essence of the Russian society. On the one hand, we could wit- ness a high voter turnout during presidential and parliamentary elections, but, on the other – a low involvement of citizens in political life.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Limit of Advance: Scenarios
    C O R P O R A T I O N BEN CONNABLE, ABBY DOLL, ALYSSA DEMUS, DARA MASSICOT, CLINT REACH, ANTHONY ATLER, WILLIAM MACKENZIE, MATTHEW POVLOCK, LAUREN SKRABALA Russia’s Limit of Advance Scenarios For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2563z1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0244-8 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents the scenarios developed to support the research and analysis presented in the RAND report Russia’s Limit of Advance: Analysis of Russian Ground Force Deployment Capabilities and Limitations, available online at www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2563.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections, Parties, and Democratization in Postcommunist States
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2013 Who's Attending the Party? Elections, Parties, and Democratization in Postcommunist States Jonathan Windle Riggs Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Riggs, Jonathan Windle, "Who's Attending the Party? Elections, Parties, and Democratization in Postcommunist States" (2013). Dissertations. 544. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/544 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2013 Jonathan Windle Riggs LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO WHO’S ATTENDING THE PARTY? ELECTIONS, PARTIES, AND DEMOCRATIZATION IN POSTCOMMUNIST STATES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN POLITICAL SCIENCE BY JONATHAN W. RIGGS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MAY 2013 Copyright by Jonathan W. Riggs, 2013. All rights reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................. v LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Electoral System of the Russian Federation
    The original of this publication was published as the research commissioned by the Policy Department for the Foreign Affairs Committee of the European Parliament within a framework contract with IRIS. The original version was published separately by the EP (Policy Department for External Policies) in 2011 (number PE 433.688). Copyrights belong to the European Parliament April 2011 THE EU-RUSSIA CENTRE REVIEW The electoral system of the Russian Federation Issue Seventeen CONTENTS Executive summary 4 Introduction 6 Background 6 The evolution of electoral law 7 Roles of legislative and executive branches 9 The Federal Assembly 9 Presidential powers 9 Elections under each President 10 The Yeltsin years 10 New constitution – President versus Parliament 10 Development of political parties under Yeltsin 11 The first three legislative elections 11 Presidential elections 1991 – 1996 13 International Reactions 13 Assessment of the Yeltsin period 15 The Putin years 16 Rise of United Russia 16 Presidential Elections 2000 - 2004 17 Changes during Putin‘s presidency 17 Control of the Media 18 International reactions 18 Assessment of Putin‘s presidency 21 Medvedev‘s Presidency 21 Modernisation Strategy 22 Electoral changes under Medvedev 22 Recent developments 23 Assessment of Medvedev‘s presidency 23 Political parties and electoral support 23 2 Russia‘s party system 23 Law on political parties 23 Funding of parties 24 Role of parties 25 Voter turnout 27 Voter attitudes 28 On political opposition 28 On electoral rules 28 On a personal cult of Putin 28 International reactions 28 Conclusion 29 Annex I: Presidential Election Results 1991-2008 33 Annex II: State Duma Election Results 1993-2007 35 Annex III: The Levada Centre surveys – Public Opinion 37 Bibliography 41 3 A study for the European Parliament by Professor Bill Bowring, Birkbeck College, London, member of the Advisory Board of the EU-Russia Centre1.
    [Show full text]
  • Performing Political Opposition in Russia
    2014:8 SOCIOLOGY PUBLICATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL RESEARCH 2014:8 PERFORMING POLITICAL OPPOSITION IN RUSSIA RUSSIA IN OPPOSITION POLITICAL PERFORMING Russian civil society is often described as weak and Russians as politically apathetic. However, as a surprise for many, tens of thousands of people gathered on the streets of Moscow to protest the fraud in the parliamentary elections in December 2011. Nevertheless, this ‘awakening’ did not last for long as Vladimir Putin took hold of the Presidency again in 2012. Since then, the Russian State Duma has passed new legislation to restrict civic and political activism. This, together with the fragmentation of the opposition movement, has hindered large-scale and sustained mobiliza- tion against the government. In 2013, the number of protests has plummeted when the risks of demonstrating are high and the benefits to participate in political activism appear non-existent. Why is it impossible for the Russian opposition to find a common voice and to sustain contentious action? This book analyzes how political opportunities and restrictions in contem- porary Russia have affected the opposition activists’ activities at the grassroots level. The book examines Russian civil society, contemporary activist strategies, and democratization from the − THE CASE OF THE YOUTH MOVEMENT OBORONA OBORONA MOVEMENT YOUTH THE OF CASE THE perspective of the young activists participating in the liberal youth movement Oborona (Defense) in Moscow and St. Petersburg. Before its dissolution in 2011, Oborona was an active participant in the Russian opposition movement, and thus it is an interesting case study of the living activist traditions in Russia. The research illustrates how the Soviet continuities and liberal ideas are entangled in Russian political activism to create new post-socialist political identities and practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Olga Johnson E-Thesis.Pdf
    The Concept of Energy Security: Implications of EU-Russia Energy Relations, 2004-2012 Olga Johnson Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Politics and International Studies August 2016 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. © 2016 The University of Leeds and Olga Johnson The right of Olga Johnson to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. 2 Acknowledgements I would like to express my special appreciation and massive thanks to many people, who at different stages of my PhD research were an important part of my life and generously contributed to the work presented in this thesis. First and foremost my profound gratitude goes to my invaluable and truly dedicated supervisors Dr. Hugh Dyer, Dr. Neil Winn and my former research supervisor Dr. Charlotte Burns. All of you have been amazing mentors for me who encouraged, guided and challenged my research, providing me with the opportunity to develop as a research scientist. Your advice regarding my research, academic career and general life circumstances have been much appreciated and acted upon. Your approach to supervision of this thesis, with a sense of humour, a ‘pinch of salt’ and constructive criticism, has undoubtedly strengthened my thesis.
    [Show full text]