Cephalosporium Maydis Is a Distinct Species in the Gaeumannomyces- Harpophora Species Complex
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Mycologia, 96(6), 2004, pp. 1294±1305. q 2004 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Cephalosporium maydis is a distinct species in the Gaeumannomyces- Harpophora species complex Amgad A. Saleh1 1962, 1963), is one of the most important fungal dis- John F. Leslie2 eases in Egypt. This disease also has been reported Department of Plant Pathology, Throckmorton Plant from India (Payak et al 1970, Ward and Bateman Sciences Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, 1999) and Hungary (Pecsi and Nemeth 1998). C. Kansas 66506-5502 maydis reproduces asexually, and no perfect state has been identi®ed. Saleh et al (2003) and Zeller et al Abstract: Cephalosporium maydis is an important (2000) showed that the pathogen is clonal in Egypt plant pathogen whose phylogenetic position relative and that the Egyptian population contains four lin- to other fungi has not been established clearly. We eages, three of which are widely distributed through- compared strains of C. maydis, strains from several out the country. other plant-pathogenic Cephalosporium spp. and sev- C. maydis originally was described based on growth eral possible relatives within the Gaeumannomyces- characters and the morphology of hyphae, conidia Harpophora species complex, to which C. maydis has and conidiophores. Domsch and Gams (1972) sug- been suggested to belong based on previous prelim- gested that the conidial state of C. maydis was a Phi- inary DNA sequence analyses. DNA sequences of the alophora (the anamorph of Gaeumannomyces Arx & nuclear genes encoding the rDNA ITS region, b-tu- D. Olivier) and that spore production in C. maydis bulin, histone H3, and MAT-2 support the hypothesis was typical of that genus (Ward and Bateman 1999). that C. maydis is a distinct taxon within the Gaeu- Most members of the genus Cephalosporium were mannomyces-Harpophora species complex. Based on transferred to the genus Acremonium, a genus of hy- ampli®ed fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) aline hyphomycetes with aculeate (spine-like) phiali- pro®les, C. maydis also is distinct from the other test- des unrelated to either Phialophora or Harpophora, ed species of Cephalosporium, Phialophora sensu lato when Gams (1971) reintroduced Acremonium. Gams and members of Gaeumannomyces-Harpophora spe- (2000) introduced Harpophora as a new genus (con- cies complex, which supports its classi®cation as Har- tains anamorphs of Gaeumannomyces and Magnapor- pophora maydis. Oligonucleotide primers for H. may- the) that is distinct from Phialophora. Harpophora spp. dis were developed that can be used in a PCR diag- are characterized by fast-growing, thin colonies with nostic protocol to rapidly and reliably detect and sickle-shape conidia. Older hyphae are heavily pig- identify this pathogen. These diagnostic PCR primers mented, younger hyphae are nearly hyaline and will aid the detection of H. maydis in diseased maize phialides are intermediate in pigmentation relative because this fungus can be dif®cult to detect and iso- to the older and younger hyphae. When he intro- late, and the movement of authentic cultures may be duced Harpophora, Gams (2000) also introduced the limited by quarantine restrictions. new combination Harpophora maydis (Samra, Sabet Key words: AFLP, b-tubulin, Corn, Harpophora and Hingorani) Gams as a replacement for Cephalo- maydis, Histone H3, Phialophora sensu lato, maize, sporium maydis. mating type, rDNA ITS Ward and Bateman (1999) used RFLP hybridiza- tion and portions of the rDNA repeat sequence to associate C. maydis with the Gaeumannomyces species INTRODUCTION complex, but their results were insuf®cient to deter- Late wilt of maize, caused by the fungus Cephalospo- mine whether C. maydis was a distinct taxon at the rium maydis Samra, Sabet & Hingorani (Samra et al species level and whether C. maydis should be reclas- si®ed. The distinguishing morphological characters Accepted for publication June 28, 2004. available for C. maydis are limited, and applying 1 Permanent address: Agricultural Genetic Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, 9 Gamaa Street, Giza, them to identify the species is not easy, so we used Egypt. DNA sequence-based approaches to help differenti- 2 Corresponding author. Department of Plant Pathology, 4002 ate this species, as has been done with numerous oth- Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State University, Man- hattan, Kansas 66506-5502. Phone: 785-532-1363. Fax: 785-532- er fungal taxa. 2414. E-mail: j¯@plantpath.ksu.edu Our objectives in this study were: (i) to determine 1294 SALEH AND LESLIE:GENETIC RELATIONSHIPS IN GAEUMANNOMYCES 1295 TABLE I. Total number of ampli®ed bands and polymorphic bands in the four AFLP pro®les evaluated (EAA/MCA, EAA/ MCC, EAA/MCG, and EAA/MGA) Number of Number of Number bands in the four polymorphic bands Species of strains AFLP pro®les (within species) C. maydis 17 68 25 C. gramineum 6 118 29 A. strictum 10 129 93 G. cylindrosporus 15 103 92 G. graminis var. avenae 8 63 42 G. graminis var. tritici 16 61 49 G. graminis var. graminisa 9 Group 1 4 70 32 Group 2 2 71 44 a Based on the AFLP data, G. graminis var. graminis strains divided into ®ve groups. Group 1 contained four strains; group 2 contained two strains; and groups 3, 4, and 5 (not shown) each contained only a single strain. the relatedness of C. maydis to strains representing 1991), take-all root rot of St. Augustine grass (Elliott et al the Gaeumannomyces-Harpophora species complex 1993, Wilkinson and Pedersen 1993), crown sheath rot of and other Cephalosporium species, (ii) to assess the rice (Walker 1981) and root rot of centipede grass (Wilkin- integrity of the species examined and their genetic son 1994). We also examined Gaeumannomyces cylindrospo- relationships and (iii) to develop a rapid PCR meth- rus D. Hornby, D. Slope, R. Gutteridge & Sivanesan [ana- morph Harpophora graminicola (Deacon) W. Gams], asso- od to detect C. maydis. Our working hypothesis is ciated with root discoloration of Poa pratensis (5 Kentucky that C. maydis is a distinct species in the Gaeuman- bluegrass) ( Jackson and Landschoot 1986). Two ®eld nomyces-Harpophora species complex and that new strains of Fusarium verticillioides (Sacc.) Nirenberg, causal molecular diagnostics are needed to rapidly and re- agent of stalk and root rot of maize (Leslie et al 1990) were liably identify this species. used as outgroup. DNA isolation.ÐFungal cultures were grown in complete MATERIALS AND METHODS medium (CM) broth (Correll et al 1987) and incubated on an orbital shaker (150 rpm) at least 3 d at room tempera- Fungal strains.ÐWe examined 44 strains from the Acremo- ture (25±28 C). The mycelia were harvested, ground to a nium-Cephalosporium species complex and 48 strains from powder with liquid nitrogen in a mortar and pestle and Gaeumannomyces-Phialophora species complex (TABLE I). stored at 270 C until DNA was extracted. Fungal DNA was The strains of C. maydis represent the four clonal lineages isolated by a CTAB method (Murray and Thompson 1980) found in Egypt (Saleh et al 2003). The other species of as modi®ed by KereÂnyi et al (1999). Cephalosporium examined include: (i) Acremonium diospyri (Crandall) W. Gams (syn., Cephalosporium diospyri Cran- AFLP reactions and data analysis.ÐAFLP reactions (Vos et dall), the causal agent of American persimmon wilt (Halls al 1995) were performed as described by Saleh et al (2003) 1990); (ii) Cephalosporium gramineum Nisikado & Ikata in in a PTC-2000 Thermal Cycler (MJ Research Inc., Water- Nisikado et al (Hymenula cerealis Ellis & Everh.), the causal town, Massachusetts). The AFLP primers used in this study agent of Cephalosporium stripe of winter wheat (Bockus were EcoRI primer (59-AGACTGCGTACCAATTC-39) fol- and Claassen 1985); and (iii) Acremonium strictum W. Gams lowed by two base pairs (AA), abbreviated as EAA, and the (syn., Cephalosporium acremonium Auct. non Corda), the MseI primer (59-GATGAGTCCTGAGTAA-39) followed by causal agent of stalk rot and black bundle diseases of maize two base pairs (CA, CC, CG, or GA), abbreviated as MCA, or Acremonium wilt of sorghum (Bandyopadhyay et al MCC, MCG, and MGA. 1987, Hanlin et al 1978). Three varieties of Gaeumanno- AFLP ®ngerprints were scored manually as ``1'' for the myces graminis (anamorph Harpophora spp.) (Sacc.) Arx & presence of a band and ``0'' for the absence of a band, Olivier were examined: (i) G. graminis var. tritici J. Walker assuming that bands with the same molecular size in differ- (GGT), the causal agent of take-all of wheat and barley; (ii) ent individuals were homologous. The Unweighted Pair G. graminis var. avenae (E.M. Turner) Dennis (GGA), the Grouping by Mathematical Averages (UPGMA) subroutine causal agent of take-all disease of oats and which also can of PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford 2000) was used to construct infect barley and cause take-all patch disease of bentgrass phylograms (phenograms) and to estimate the genetic sim- (Dernoeden and O'Neill 1983, Couch 1995); and (iii) G. ilarity among fungal strains of each species. graminis var. graminis (GGG), which has a wider host range than either GGT or GGA, is a weak pathogen of wheat (Bry- Conversion of AFLP markers into diagnostic PCR markers for an et al 1995) and causes Bermudagrass decline (Elliott C. maydis.ÐAFLP bands that differentiate the lineages of 1296 MYCOLOGIA TABLE II. PCR primers for nuclear gene fragments sequenced in this study Name Nucleotide sequencea Gene Reference ITS3 59-GCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGC-39 rDNA-ITS White et al (1990) ITS4 59-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-39 ITS5 59-GGAAGTAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-39 H3-1a 59-ACTAAGCAGACCGCCCGCAGG-39 Histone H3 Steenkamp et al (1999) H3-1b 59-GCGGGCGAGCTGGATGTCCTT-39 T1 59-AACATGCGTGAGATTGTAAGT-39 b-tubulin O'Donnell and Cigelnik T2 59-TAGTGACCCTTGGCCCAGTTG-39 (1997) T21 59-GGTTTGCCAGAAAGCAGCACC-39 ChHMG1 59-AAGGCNCCNCGYCCNATGAAC-39 MAT-2 Arie et al (1997) ChHMG2 59-CTNGGNGTGTAYTTGTAATTNGG-39 NcHMG1 59-CCYCGYCCYCCYAAYGCNTAYAT-39 NcHMG2 59-CGNGGRTTRTARCGRTARTNRGG-39 CMa¯p11 59-TTTCCTGCGGTGCCAA-39 Unknown This study CMa¯p12 59-TAATGCGGTTAGCCACTC-39 a Abbreviations: Y 5 CorT;N5 A, T, C, or G.