Desk-Based Heritage Assessment in Connection with a Proposed Energy Reserve Facility at Land to the East Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Desk-Based Heritage Assessment in Connection with a Proposed Energy Reserve Facility at Land to the East Of DESK-BASED HERITAGE ASSESSMENT IN CONNECTION WITH A PROPOSED ENERGY RESERVE FACILITY AT LAND TO THE EAST OF WATERSWALLOWS INDUSTRIAL PARK, WATERSWALLOWS, DERBYSHIRE September 2017 Our Ref: JAC23653 RPS Suite D10, Josephs Well, Hanover Walk Leeds LS3 1AB Tel: 0113 2206190 Email: [email protected] rpsgroup.com QUALITY MANAGEMENT Prepared by: Dan Slatcher Authorised by: Andrew Stevenson Date: September 2017 Project Number/Document JAC23653/ “Waterswallows” STOR 119 Ltd/ REV0 Reference: COPYRIGHT © RPS The material presented in this report is confidential. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of STOR119 Ltd and shall not be distributed or made available to any other company or person without the knowledge and written consent of RPS. rpsgroup.com CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Site Description ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Scheme Description ................................................................................................................................ 2 Designed-in Mitigation ............................................................................................................................. 3 Project Aim .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Project Archive ........................................................................................................................................ 3 2 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................... 4 3 PLANNING CONTEXT ........................................................................................................................... 7 4 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC BACKGROUND ..................................................................... 10 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 10 5 ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL .......................................................................................................... 13 6 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................... 14 7 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES ................................................................................................ 15 Published ............................................................................................................................................... 15 Unpublished ........................................................................................................................................... 15 Published Maps ..................................................................................................................................... 15 FIGURES ......................................................................................................................................................... 16 APPENDIX 1: HER ENTRIES (SUPPLIED BY DERBYSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGY SERVICE) ...................... 17 APPENDIX 2: HISTORIC MAPS (SUPPLIED BY LANDMARK MAPPING) ................................................. 18 LIST OF FIGURES: Figure 1: Site Location and HER Data Figure 2: Designated Assets within 1km of Proposed Development Figure 3: Historic Landscape Character rpsgroup.com EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RPS Planning and Development was commissioned to produce a heritage assessment in connection with a proposed energy reserve facility at a site to the east of Waterswallows Industrial Park, Waterswallows Road, Buxton, in Derbyshire. The facility would generate electricity during peak periods of demand (limited to a few hours per week) although the specific level of output would vary according to local demand. The proposal site is located some 3km northeast of Buxton Railway Station and 900m southeast of the centre of Upper End, on the north side of Waterswallows Road at its junction with Hardybarn Lane. The proposal site is centred on National Grid Reference SK 085 752. The proposal site is bounded to the west by the Waterswallows Recycling Centre, to the north and east by farmland and to the south by Waterswallows Road and Waterswallows Quarry. The proposal site lies at an altitude of approximately 345m AOD and covers some 0.34ha. The proposal site currently comprises part of two grass fields, the southern being the sire of a former farmhouse. Both fields were being grazed by sheep at the time of the site visit in September 2017. A small concrete block building is located on the eastern boundary of the southern field, outside the proposal site. The geology of the proposal site comprises limestone of the Low Limestone Formation. To the northwest of the proposal site the solid geology comprises lava of the Lower Miller’s Dale Lava Member, with an unnamed igneous intrusion to the south. No superficial deposits are recorded. This study has revealed that there are no designated sites (e.g. scheduled monuments, listed buildings) within the proposal site. The closest designated assets are the scheduled monuments located some 1.9km northeast of the proposal site. Neither these nor any other scheduled monuments, listed buildings, registered parks and gardens, registered battlefields or conservation areas nor their settings would be affected by the proposed development. There are no recorded remains of confirmed prehistoric date within or in the immediate vicinity of the proposed development area, although those Mesolithic and later remains located nearby at the Buxton Water Bottling Works on Waterswallows Lane are significant. Later development within the proposal site may have damaged any remains here. The line of a Roman road runs within 1km of the proposal site. The proposal site lay within the hinterland of Buxton during the Roman period. There are few sites or finds of medieval date in the vicinity of the proposal site. Later mapping indicates that the wider area was probably part of a common grazing field during the later medieval period. There is no evidence for medieval settlement activity within the proposed development area. The proposal site itself is named as Hardybarn Farm, with Hardybarn marked at the crossroads with Longridge Road to the east of the proposal site on the first edition Ordnance Survey (OS) six-inch to the mile map of 1882. The farm buildings are shown as being located in the southern field of the proposal site and had been demolished by 1999 according to Google Earth. There is no recorded evidence for activity, other than use as agricultural land over the proposal site until the 19th century when parts of it were used as a farm. The farm within the proposal site was demolished by 1999. There is no evidence for the proposed development area to contain below ground remains of the highest significance, or of sufficient significance to warrant preservation in situ. 1 rpsgroup.com 1 INTRODUCTION Background 1.1 RPS Planning and Development was commissioned to produce a heritage assessment in connection with a proposed energy reserve facility at a site to the east of Waterswallows Industrial Park, Waterswallows Road, Buxton, in Derbyshire. 1.2 The facility would generate electricity during peak periods of demand (limited to a few hours per week) although the specific level of output would vary according to local demand. Site Description 1.3 The proposed development area is located some 3km northeast of Buxton Railway Station and 900m southeast of the centre of Upper End, on the north side of Waterswallows Road at its junction with Hardybarn Lane and immediately east of Waterswallows Industrial Park. The proposal site is centred on National Grid Reference SK 085 752. 1.4 The proposal site is bounded to the west by the Waterswallows Recycling Centre, to the north and east by farmland and to the south by a drystone wall, a wooded area, Waterswallows Road and Waterswallows Quarry on the south side of Waterswallows Road. The proposal site lies at an altitude of approximately 345m AOD and covers some 0.34ha. 1.5 The proposal site currently comprises part of two grass fields, the southern being the sire of a former farmhouse. Booth fields were being grazed by sheep at the time of the site visit in September 2017. A small concrete block building is located on the eastern boundary of the southern field, outside the proposal site. 1.6 The geology of the proposal site comprises limestone of the Low Limestone Formation. To the northwest of the proposal site the solid geology comprises lava of the Lower Miller’s Dale Lava Member, with an unnamed igneous intrusion to the south. No superficial deposits are recorded (http://mapapps.bgs.ac.uk/geologyofbritain/home.html). Scheme Description 1.7 The proposal comprises an Energy Reserve Facility including a small scale gas-fired energy generation facility with a capacity of approximately 20 MW in order to support the provision of local power during peak periods: 1.8 The main components of the scheme include: . 5 containerised engine units; . 5 emission stacks 8m in height (i.e. 3.3m above the containers)
Recommended publications
  • Executive Summary: Air Quality in Our Area Air Quality in High Peak
    High Peak Borough Council Annual Status Report 2018 and 2019 2018 and 2019 Air Quality Annual Status Report (ASR) In fulfilment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 Local Air Quality Management September 2019 LAQM Annual Status Report 2018 and 2019 High Peak Borough Council Annual Status Report 2018 and 2019 Local Authority Daniel McCrory Officer Department Regulatory Services Address Town Hall, Buxton SK17 6DZ Telephone 01538 395400 ext 4413 E-mail [email protected] Report Reference J3518/1/D2 number Date September 2019 David Bailey and Dr Clare Beattie Report prepared by LAQM Annual Status Report 2018 and 2019 High Peak Borough Council Annual Status Report 2018 and 2019 Annual Status Report (ASR) Air Quality - Derbyshire County Council; Endorsement from the Director of Public Air pollution has a significant effect on public health, and poor air quality is the largest environmental risk to public health in the UK. Long-term exposure to air pollution has been shown to reduce life expectancy, due to its impact on cardiovascular and respiratory diseases and lung cancer. Many everyday activities such as transport, industrial processes, farming, energy generation and domestic heating can have a detrimental effect on air quality. The annual status report is fundamental to ensuring the monitoring of trends and identification of areas of local air pollution exposure. The cumulative effect of a range of interventions has the greatest potential to reduce local air pollution and improve population health, as such the annual status report and associated action plans provide an opportunity to engage a range of partners.
    [Show full text]
  • A6 Corridor Study Final Report Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
    A6 Corridor Study Final Report Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council August 2014 A6 Corridor Study Final Report Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for use in relation to the A6 Corridor Study. Atkins Limited assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This document has 202 pages including the cover. Document history Job number: 5115815 Document ref: Final Report Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Rev 1.1 Draft - Client comment AB PB GR GR 14/12/12 Rev 1.2 Draft - Client comment GR AB NM NM 26/2/13 Rev 1.3 Draft - Client comment GR AB NM NM 26/6/13 Rev 1.4 Draft - Client comment GR AB NM NM 31/7/13 Final Draft – Client Rev 1.5 GR NM NM NM 20/12/13 comment Rev 1.6 Final Draft GR NM NM NM 20/02/14 Rev 2.0 Final GR NM NM NM 04/07/14 Rev 2.1 Final GR NM NM NM 31/07/14 Rev 2.2 Final GR NM NM NM 13/08/14 Atkins Final Report | Version 2.2 | August 2014 | 5115815 A6 Corridor Study Final Report Table of contents Chapter Pages 1. Introduction 4 Study Brief 4 Background to Commission 4 2. Setting the Context for an A6 Corridor Transport Strategy 6 SEMMMS 6 A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road 7 A6MARR Traffic Model 7 Traffic Growth/ A6MARR Scheme Impact 9 Existing Traffic Conditions 12 Understanding Travel Demands 23 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 9-1-2017 Tunstead Quarry
    Public Agenda Item No. 3.2 DERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL REGULATORY – PLANNING COMMITTEE 9 January 2017 Report of the Strategic Director – Economy, Transport and Communities 2 (i) INITIAL REVIEW OF MINERAL PLANNING PERMISSIONS CODE NUMBERS 1986/9/2/5, 1986/9/2/8, CHA/1173/5, HPK/1181/1091, HPK/022937 AND HPK/030328 UNDER SCHEDULE 13 OF THE ENVIRONMENT ACT 1995: APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF NEW CONDITIONS; AND (ii) FIRST PERIODIC REVIEW OF THE 1946 INTERIM DEVELOPMENT ORDER (IDO) MINERAL PLANNING PERMISSION CODE NUMBER TQ/659A UNDER SCHEDULE 14 OF THE ENVIRONMENT ACT 1995: APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF NEW CONDITIONS AT TUNSTEAD QUARRY, TUNSTEAD, BUXTON APPLICANT: TARMAC LTD CODE NOS: R1/1197/11 and R1/0913/27 1.36.R and 1.36.R1 Introductory Summary New schemes of conditions have been submitted by Tarmac Ltd under the requirements of schedules 13 and 14 of the Environment Act 1995 to update planning controls on future operations at Tunstead Quarry, Tunstead, Buxton under planning permission code numbers TQ/659A (1946 Interim Development Order (IDO)), 1986/9/2/5, 1986/9/2/8, CHA/1173/5, HPK/1181/109, 1 HPK/022937 and HPK/030328. The schemes, together with an Environmental Statement (ES), provide details of the proposed working of the site, environmental protection, the form of restoration and the suggested planning conditions under which the site should be worked. I consider that certain changes to the submitted conditions are necessary and my recommendation relates to an amended schedule of conditions. I do not consider that the amended conditions would restrict the working rights of the applicant so as to provide any ground for a claim for compensation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limestone and Dolomite Resources of the Country Around Buxton, Derbyshire Description of 1 :25 000 Sheet SK 07 and Parts of SK 06 and 08
    INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES Mineral Assessment Report77 Natural Environment Research Council 0 The limestone and dolomite Marple resources of the country SJ 98 SK 08 SK 18 around Buxton, Derbyshire .Castleton B Whaley Bridge Description of 1:25 000 sheet SK 07 and partsof SK 06 SJ 97 SK 07 oTideswell 0 Buxton SK 17 and 08 ' Macclesfield - Monyash SJ 96 SK 06 0 Bosley SK 16 D. J . Harrison Contributor N. Aitkenhead 0 Crown copyright 1981 ISBN 0 11 884177 7" London Her Majesty's Stationery Office 1981 PREFACE The firsttwelve reports on theassessment of British National resources of many industrial minerals may mineral resources appeared in the Reportseries of the seem so large that stocktaking appears unnecessary, but Institute of Geological Sciences assubseries. a Report the demand for minerals and for land allfor purposes is 13 and subsequent reports appear as Mineral intensifying and it has become increasinglyclear in Assessment Reports of the Institute. recent years that regionalassessments of resources of these minerals should be undertaken. The publication of Report 30 describes the procedure for assessment of information about the quantity and qualityof deposits limestone resources, and reports26 and 47 describe the over large areasis intended to provide a comprehensive limestone resources of particular areas. factual background againstwhich planning decisions Details of publishedreports appear at theend of this can be made. report. The interdepartmental MineralResources Any enquiries concerning this report may be addressed Consultative Committee recommended that limestone to Head, Industrial MineralsAssessment Unit, should be investigated, and, following feasibility a study Institute of Geological Sciences, Keyworth, initiated in 1970 by the Institute and funded by the Nottingham NG12 5GG.
    [Show full text]
  • Economy Transport and Communities
    PUBLIC Economy, Transport and Environment Department Service Plan 2016-17 Mike Ashworth Strategic Director - Economy, Transport and Environment Derbyshire County Council Version 1.0: Approved by Cabinet on Visions and Values Departmental Values: The Department has established a set of values that will be key to the achievement of the Council’s Vision. The values of Trust, Ambition, Integrity, Building Positive Relationships, Pride and Valuing Diversity will guide us in the way we deliver services and deal with customers and colleagues. Behaviours that support these values form part of the annual My Plan process. One of the main ways we will measure our success in adhering to these values will be the employee survey results. 1 Contents Page 1. Policy Context 1 2. Operational Context 3 3. Economy and Regeneration 6 4. Trading Standards 15 5. Transport and Environment 18 6. Derbyshire Sports Partnership 30 7. Highways 32 8. Community Safety 40 9. Libraries and Heritage 43 10. Resources and Improvement 46 2 Chapter 1 Policy Context Working with partners, business communities, other local authorities and statutory organisations the Department will strive to make Derbyshire a more prosperous, better connected and safer County with an increasingly resilient and competitive economy. Every opportunity will be taken to support economic growth and encourage the creation of more job opportunities in order to provide a thriving local economy and improve the quality of life for all Derbyshire residents. The Service Plan for 2016-2017 outlines how the
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Roads in Britain
    ROMAN ROADS IN BRITAIN c < t < r c ROMAN ROADS IN BRITAIN BY THE LATE THOMAS CODRINGTON M, INST.C. E., F. G S. fFITH LARGE CHART OF THE ROMAN ROADS AND SMALL MAPS IN THE TEXT REPRINT OF THIRD EDITION LONDON SOCIETY FOR PROMOTING CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE NEW YORK: THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1919 . • r r 11 'X/^i-r * ' Ci First Edition^ 1903 Second Edition, Revised, 1905 Tliird Edition, Revised, 1918 (.Reprint), 19 „ ,, 19 PREFACE The following attempt to describe the Roman roads of Britain originated in observations made in all parts of the country as opportunities presented themselves to me from time to time. On turning to other sources of information, the curious fact appeared that for a century past the litera- ture of the subject has been widely influenced by the spurious Itinerary attributed to Richard of Cirencester. Though that was long ago shown to be a forgery, statements derived from it, and suppositions founded upon them, are continually repeated, casting suspicion sometimes unde- served on accounts which prove to be otherwise accurate. A wide publicity, and some semblance of authority, have been given to imaginary roads and stations by the new Ordnance maps. Those who early in the last century, under the influence of the new Itinerary, traced the Roman roads, unfortunately left but scanty accounts of the remains which came under their notice, many of which have since been destroyed or covered up in the making of modern roads; and with the evidence now available few Roman roads can be traced continuously. The gaps can often be filled with reasonable certainty, but more often the precise course is doubtful, and the entire course of some roads connecting known stations of the Itinerary of Antonine can only be guessed at.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Peak Boundary Walk
    DARK PEAK BOUNDARY WALK The title 'Boundary Walk' refers to the nature of the walk, a circuit of 80 miles around the fringes of three great moorland masses of Kinder Scout, Bleaklow and Black Hill that comprise the Dark Peak. The route is mainly high level but linking these sections a variety of terrain including bridleway tracks, field paths, sheltered wooded cloughs and numerous reservoirs will be encountered. The bleak and wild moors of the Dark ·Peak are never far away and often dominate the views. The route was completed to my satisfaction in November 1987 having been put together on occasional weekend trips over a couple of years. My intention was to create an enjoyable (hopefully) circular walk suitable for short hostelling/backpacking holidays. The entire route is covered by OS Sheet 110 (1:50,000) Sheffield and Huddersfield area. Route Outline From Sett Valley car park, Hayfield via Cracken Edge - South Head - Dimpus Gate Rushup Edge - Rowter Farm - Bradwell Moor - Bradwell. Abney Moor - Leadmill Bridge - Hathersage. Mitchell Field - Carl Walk - Burbage Brook - Stanage Edge - Moscar Lodge - Sugworth Hall - Strines- Back Tor - Margery Hill - Cut Gate - Langsett. Carlecotes - Dunford Bridge - Winscar Reservoir - Holme - Wessenden Head - Marsden. Redbrook Reservoir - Diggle - Aldermans Hill - Dove Stone Reservoir - Chew Reservoir - Tintwistle - Padfield - Old Glossop. Cown Edge - Rowarth - Lantern Pike - Birch Vale - Sett Valley Trail back to Hayfield. Suggested four day tour:- Day One Hayfield to Hathersage 20 Miles YH Day Two Hathersage to Langsett 21 miles YH Day Three Langsett to Marsden 16 miles B&B Final Day Marsden to Hayfield 25 miles Accommodation There are excellent Youth Hostels at Hathersage and Langsett.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Moor Quarry (Tunstead) Wormhill Buxton (Np/Hpk/1013/0898, M11781, Jen)
    Planning Committee – Part A 13 January 2017 Page 1 7. REVIEW OF OLD MINERAL PERMISSION APPLICATION - OLD MOOR QUARRY (TUNSTEAD) WORMHILL BUXTON (NP/HPK/1013/0898, M11781, JEN) APPLICANT: LAFARGE TARMAC (SITE NOW OPERATED BY TARMAC) Site and Surroundings Old Moor Quarry is part of a wider site incorporating both Tunstead Quarry and Old Moor Quarry. The sites are worked together as one operation by the operator. However, for the purposes of planning, Tunstead is located entirely outside the National Park and thus comes under the planning control of Derbyshire County Council. Old Moor is predominantly located in the National Park, (with a very small area in Derbyshire County Council). Both Tunstead and Old Moor are undergoing the necessary processes to enable the relevant planning authorities to determine modern working conditions. Tunstead/Old Moor Quarry is located approximately 4 kilometres to the east of Buxton and is one of the largest quarries in Britain encompassing an area of over one square mile. The quarry produces a range of limestone products. Tunstead Quarry was established in the 1920s to supply high purity industrial limestone for use within the chemical and other industries. Tunstead has operated under planning controls since 1946 benefiting from several related permissions for the winning and working of minerals and the disposal of mineral waste. Tunstead Quarry and Old Moor Quarry are separated by Great Rocks Dale, a dry valley, within which runs a freight railway line. The quarries are connected by a causeway bridge over the railway. An application was made in 1974 to the Peak Park Joint Planning Board (PPPB) for the majority of the area of Old Moor (and application was also made to Derbyshire County Council for the small part of Old Moor within their administrative control).
    [Show full text]
  • Journalofderbysh08derb.Pdf
    • • 3b ±0 .Jlfct H WA ^ftfc. ^\* ^^ ^ ^B# ^i VHP *d»~^iB 4t A u %; * / t * Plate I. SIZE OF ORIGINAL 9'* 7 Alabaster Sculpture. Property of Rev? B.W Spilsbury, Vicar of Fmdern. f : JOURNAL OF THE DERBYSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY. EDITED BY J. CHARLES COX, LL.D. VOL. VIII. JANUARY, 1886. Xon&on BEMROSE & SONS, 23, OLD BAILEY; AND DERBY. Ill CONTENTS. PAGE List of Officers v Rules - vii List of Members x Secretary's Report xxi Balance Sheet xxvi On a Pair of Ancient Ram's. Horns. By William Webb, M.D. i On the Tutbury Horn. By Rev. J. Charles Cox, LL.D. 7 A Calendar of the Fines for the County of Derby from their Commencement in the Reign of Richard I. By W. H. Hart, F.S.A. 15 On the Manor House of South Winfield. By Rev. Charles Cox, LL.D. ----- 65 J. On an Alabaster Sculpture, the property of the Rev. B. W. Spilsbury, Vicar of Findern. LL.D. By Rev. J. Charles Cox, 79 On a Charter of Darley Abbey. By W. R. Holland 92 Alsop and Other Charters. By W. R. Holland 9s Some Notes Extracted from the Pipe Rolls ok King Henry the Second. By Pym Yeatman I 3 I On a Painted Glass Window in Morley Church, Derbyshire. By George Bailey - - '43 On a Mediaeval Paten at Hartshorne. - 15° By W. H. St. John Hope, M.A., F.S.A. - _ - - On the Geology of some of the River-Scenery of Derbyshire. By A. T. Metcalfe, F.G.S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Resource Assessment of Roman Derbyshire
    East Midlands Archaeological Research Framework: Resource Assessment of Roman Derbyshire An Archaeological Resource Assessment of Roman Derbyshire Andrew Myers - Derbyshire Sites and Monuments Records Officer Note: For copyright reasons the figures are currently omitted from the web version of this paper. It is hoped to include them in future versions. Geology and Topography Derbyshire's landscape encompasses dramatic variations in geology, geomorphology and soil types. In the north lie the uplands formed by gritstones in the district of High Peak, and the dissected Carboniferous limestone of the southern High Peak and Derbyshire Dales. The latter is flanked on its eastern side by the gritstone outliers of the East Moors and Stanton Moor. In the north east, the Magnesian limestone of Bolsover district forms a narrow north- south ridge of higher ground. Sandwiched between the gritstone East Moors and the Magnesian limestone lie the complex, lower lying coal measures, running from the South Yorkshire border southwards through North East Derbyshire, Chesterfield, Amber Valley and Erewash. Here they give way to the Triassic marls and loams of South Derbyshire and the Trent Valley, Derby district and the southernmost parts of Derbyshire Dales. The SMR: Distribution of Records The Roman period accounts for 10.7% of total SMR records. The distribution of Roman records within Derbyshire reveals something of the same quantitative bias for the uplands of Derbyshire Dales which has been noted previously for the various prehistoric periods. Derbyshire Dales, which comprises 30.3% of Derbyshire's surface area, accounts for 41.6% of all Roman records. In contrast, North East and South Derbyshire comprise 10.5% and 12.9% of Derbyshire's surface area, but only have 3.2% and 2.6% of Roman records respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • The Peak District of Derbyshire and the Neighbourhood. with Maps
    UNIVERSITY OF CA RIVERSIDE, LIBRARY 3 1210 01970 5027 INDEX MAP SHEWING THE SECTION MAPS IN THE GUIDE .TabuBjgDioiamerT A Co-.-Tidic* THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Ex Libris C. K. OGDEN J . CYCLING ROUTES. Opp. Pink Page 7. CYCLING DISTANCES OF CHIEF TOWNS ON ACCOMPANYING MAP FROM PLACES OF ACCESS. Ash- Derby. Buxton. bourne. Miles. Miles. Miles. London, by St Albans 125 138 163 ,, Bedford .. 130 143 168 Bath 128 143 166 Bedford 92 117 Birmingham 40 55 75 Bradford 80 "0 50 Bristol 12:. 140 163 Cambridge 109 134 Cheltenham 101 124 Coventry 56 81 Don caster 66 48 Hereford (via Worcester) 104 129 Huddersfield 58 38 Hull 107 97 Gloucester 106 129 Grantham 54 79 Leamington 91 Leeds 54 Leicester 66 Liverpool 61 Lynn (Peterborough and J KlutfnQ 137 \ Leicester) . \ Manchester 63 45 25 Northampton 60 73 98 Norwich (Peterborough) 153 166 191 Nottingham 16 29 46 Oxford 92 105 130 Peterborough 75 113 Shrewsbury (Stafford) 62| 76J Stafford 32 39 Worcester 65 88 York (Doncaster) 86 81 NOTES. Little to choose ; both good. By St Albans the more interesting. Very interesting. Hilly south of Broadway very quaint village (" Lygon Arms"). Good. Do. (Joins 3 at Warwick). Very fair. (Joins 1 at Uttoxeter). See p. 18, Very hilly ; enters Peak at Clossop or Penistone Hilly. Good and level. (Joins 11 at Doncaster). Mostly' level ; dull, good roads. ' 5. do. Do. do. Do. (Hurling anb 4¥lotcring. Cycling and Motoring i From London ii From Birmingham iv Through the District vi It is hardly necessary to remind tourists that the Peak is a specially hilly country ; further, that most of the roads cross the hills from valley to valley rather than follow the course of any particular one.
    [Show full text]
  • Redmires MBT, Sheffield, South Yorkshire Report Status Final Archeritage Project No
    ArcHeritage Redmires MBT, Sheffield, South Yorkshire Archaeological appraisal ArcHeritage 2017 Redmires MBT, South Yorkshire: Archaeological Assessment ArcHeritage Campo House, 54 Campo Lane, Sheffield, S1 2EG Phone: +44 (0)114 2728884 Fax: +44 (0)114 3279793 [email protected] www.archeritage.co.uk Key Project Information Project Name Redmires MBT Report Title Redmires MBT, Sheffield, South Yorkshire Report status Final ArcHeritage Project No. 1094 Type of Project Archaeological Appraisal Client Sheffield City Council NGR SK 25594 85121 (NE) to SK 24894 84643 (SW) Author Mark Stenton Illustrations Mark Stenton Editor Glyn Davies Report Number and Date 2017/82 29.11.17 Version and filename v1 Redmires MBT Copyright Declaration: ArcHeritage give permission for the material presented within this report to be used by the archives/repository with which it is deposited, in perpetuity, although ArcHeritage retains the right to be identified as the author of all project documentation and reports, as specified in the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (chapter IV, section 79). The permission will allow the repository to reproduce material, including for use by third parties, with the copyright owner suitably acknowledged. Disclaimer:Disclaimer:Disclaimer: This Report has been prepared solely for the person/party which commissioned it and for the specifically titled project or named part thereof referred to in the Report. The Report should not be relied upon or used for any other project by the commissioning person/party without first obtaining independent verification as to its suitability for such other project, and obtaining the prior written approval of York Archaeological Trust for Excavation and Research Limited (“YAT”) (trading as ArcHeritage).
    [Show full text]