DOCSLIB.ORG

Redmires MBT, Sheffield, South Yorkshire Report Status Final Archeritage Project No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Redmires MBT, Sheffield, South Yorkshire Report Status Final Archeritage Project No ArcHeritage Redmires MBT, Sheffield, South Yorkshire Archaeological appraisal ArcHeritage 2017 Redmires MBT, South Yorkshire: Archaeological Assessment ArcHeritage Campo House, 54 Campo Lane, Sheffield, S1 2EG Phone: +44 (0)114 2728884 Fax: +44 (0)114 3279793 [email protected] www.archeritage.co.uk Key Project Information Project Name Redmires MBT Report Title Redmires MBT, Sheffield, South Yorkshire Report status Final ArcHeritage Project No. 1094 Type of Project Archaeological Appraisal Client Sheffield City Council NGR SK 25594 85121 (NE) to SK 24894 84643 (SW) Author Mark Stenton Illustrations Mark Stenton Editor Glyn Davies Report Number and Date 2017/82 29.11.17 Version and filename v1 Redmires MBT Copyright Declaration: ArcHeritage give permission for the material presented within this report to be used by the archives/repository with which it is deposited, in perpetuity, although ArcHeritage retains the right to be identified as the author of all project documentation and reports, as specified in the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (chapter IV, section 79). The permission will allow the repository to reproduce material, including for use by third parties, with the copyright owner suitably acknowledged. Disclaimer:Disclaimer:Disclaimer: This Report has been prepared solely for the person/party which commissioned it and for the specifically titled project or named part thereof referred to in the Report. The Report should not be relied upon or used for any other project by the commissioning person/party without first obtaining independent verification as to its suitability for such other project, and obtaining the prior written approval of York Archaeological Trust for Excavation and Research Limited (“YAT”) (trading as ArcHeritage). YAT accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this Report being relied upon or used for any purpose other than the purpose for which it was specifically commissioned. Nobody is entitled to rely upon this Report other than the person/party which commissioned it. YAT accepts no responsibility or liability for any use of or reliance upon this Report by anybody other than the commissioning person/party. © York Archaeological Trust for Excavation and Research Limited. Registered Office: 47 Aldwark, York YO1 7BX. A Company Limited by Guarantee. Registered in England No. 1430801. A Registered Charity in England & Wales (No. 09060) and Scotland (No. SCO42846) i CONTENTS NonNonNon-Non---technicaltechnical Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ iiiiiiiii 111 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 444 222 LOCATION, GEOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 444 333 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 444 3.1 Aims ............................................................................................................................................. 4 3.2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 4 444 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................... 777 4.1 Designated assets ........................................................................................................................ 7 4.2 Prehistoric, Roman and Medieval .............................................................................................. 7 4.3 Sixteenth to eighteenth centuries .............................................................................................. 8 4.4 Nineteenth century ..................................................................................................................... 9 4.5 Modern ...................................................................................................................................... 10 555 SITE VISITSITE VISIT .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 111111 666 ARCHAEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL AND SIGNIFICANCE .................................................................................................................. 131313 777 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 141414 888 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 141414 999 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 151515 PLATESPLATESPLATES ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 171717 FIGURESFIGURESFIGURES ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 262626 AAAPPENDIXAPPENDIX 1 ––– GAZETEER OF HERITAGE ASSETS ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 272727 Redmires MBT, Sheffield, South Yorkshire Archaeological Appraisal Report No 2017/82 ii Figures Figure 1: Site location map Figure 2: Heritage assets Figure 3: 1791and c.1825 Fairbank plans Figure 4: 1829 Fairbank plan and 1854 OS map Figure 5: 1894 and 1924 OS maps Figure 6: 1956 and 1976 OS maps Figure 7: Walkover survey photograph viewpoints Plates Plate 1: Looking north-east towards site of Fairthorn Farm Plate 2: Bank on site of c.1825 Fairthorn farmyard boundary Plate 3: North-east terminus of MBT Plate 4: Possible saw pit, to north of MBT Plate 5: Surviving part of 1950s plantation Plate 6: MBT route across felled plantation Plate 7: MBT route across felled plantation Plate 8: Looking east towards Redmires Reservoirs Plate 9: Dry stone wall field boundary Plate 10: Dry stone wall field boundary Plate 11: Looking south-west towards Long Causeway Plate 12: Former path, to be crossed by MBT Plate 13: Dry stone wall along 1791 enclosure boundary Plate 14: Looking north towards south-west end of MBT Plate 15: South-west terminus of MBT Plate 16: Long Causeway, looking north-east with MBT route at left Plate 17: Long Causeway, looking north-east with MBT route at left Plate 18: Long Causeway, looking north-east towards MBT terminus and Redmires Reservoirs Redmires MBT, Sheffield, South Yorkshire Archaeological Appraisal Report No 2017/82 iii NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY This report present the results of an archaeological appraisal of the route of Redmires Mountain Bike Trail, South Yorkshire. The report was commissioned by Sheffield City Council. Research for the report demonstrates that there are no heritage assets recorded along the route of the Redmires MBT, although a small number of flints have been found in its immediate vicinity. These were all surface finds and there is no evidence of prehistoric settlement in the area. The Long Causeway, immediately to the south of the MBT, is not now thought to be a Roman road, although a Roman coin has been found near the Stanage Pole, to the south-west of the route. The Long Causeway is a medieval and early post-medieval
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stanage Edge, in the Peak District National Park : Walking with Hikers to Understand Their Perception of the Place Maïlys Cochard
    An accessible escape on stanage edge, in the peak district national park : walking with hikers to understand their perception of the place Maïlys Cochard To cite this version: Maïlys Cochard. An accessible escape on stanage edge, in the peak district national park : walking with hikers to understand their perception of the place. Engineering Sciences [physics]. 2015. dumas- 01842383 HAL Id: dumas-01842383 https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-01842383 Submitted on 18 Jul 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Copyright AN ACCESSIBLE ESCAPE ON STANAGE EDGE, IN THE PEAK DISTRICT NATIONAL PARK: WALKING WITH HIKERS TO UNDERSTAND THEIR PERCEPTION OF THE PLACE Cochard Maïlys VA Risques, Pollutions et Nuisances Promotion 60 4 Septembre 2015 Président du jury : Madame Sylvie Bony (ENTPE) Maître de TFE : Monsieur James Evans (University of Manchester) Expert : Monsieur Bill Gordon (Peak District National Park Authority) NOTICE ANALYTIQUE NOM PRENOM AUTEUR Cochard Maïlys TITRE DU TFE An accessible escape on Stanage Edge, in the Peak District National Park: walking with hikers to understand their perception of the place ORGANISME D'AFFILIATION ET NOM PRÉNOM LOCALISATION MAITRE DE TFE University of Manchester Evans James COLLATION Nombre de pages du rapport : Annexes : 52 références 53 pages 24 documents, bibliographiques 21 pages MOTS CLES Walking interviews, Accessibility, Nature, Landscape, Escape.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Rare Birds in Great Britain in 1996 M
    British Birds Established 1907; incorporating 'The Zoologist', established 1843 Report on rare birds in Great Britain in 1996 M. J. Rogers and the Rarities Committee with comments by K. D. Shaw and G. Walbridge A feature of the year was the invasion of Arctic Redpolls Carduelis homemanni and the associated mass of submitted material. Before circulations began, we feared the worst: a huge volume of contradictory reports with differing dates, places and numbers and probably a wide range of criteria used to identify the species. In the event, such fears were mostly unfounded. Several submissions were models of clarity and co-operation; we should like to thank those who got together to sort out often-confusing local situations and presented us with excellent files. Despite the numbers, we did not resort to nodding reports through: assessment remained strict, but the standard of description and observation was generally high (indeed, we were able to enjoy some of the best submissions ever). Even some rejections were 'near misses', usually through no fault of the observers. Occasionally, one or two suffered from inadequate documentation ('Looked just like bird A' not being quite good enough on its own). Having said that, we feel strongly that the figures presented in this report are minimal and a good many less-obvious individuals were probably passed over as 'Mealies' C. flammea flammea, often when people understandably felt more inclined to study the most distinctive Arctics. The general standard of submissions varies greatly. We strongly encourage individuality, but the use of at least the front of the standard record form helps.
    [Show full text]
  • WWC0103 3 Divers to Sites Footer4
    !" "!# $% ## & ' ( ) $% " & #* ( Total numbers of Red-throated Divers recorded respectively) (Webb et al in prep b). Subsequent by WeBS in Great Britain in 2001/02 were surveys (WWT data) have suggested that this notably high, and very close to the highest yet mid winter peak may be a regular occurrence, recorded by Core Counts (1,361 in December but that the divers at this site may be very 1995), primarily as a consequence of a large mobile, distributions changing markedly over count in Cardigan Bay in December 2001. short periods. Aerial surveys of Liverpool Bay Counts in 2002/03 were unexceptional. British (covering a strip extending 20-25 km from shore totals during these winters showed a similar between Anglesey and Morecambe Bay) in pattern, with a marked increase in numbers 2001/02 and 2002/03 recorded counted maxima from September reflecting the southward of 226 divers (presumed all to be Red-throats) in migration of British and Scandinavian breeding January 2003, when 130 were recorded in birds. Numbers peaked in December/January Colwyn Bay; application of distance analysis though the decline to small numbers in summer suggests that peak numbers were 1,599 in the varies in its timing, and moderate numbers may first winter (with 95% confidence intervals of be recorded as late as May, particularly on the 1,063 to 2,405 birds) and 1,210 (901-1,626) in the Scottish east coast. Given that British-breeding second (Cranswick et al 2004, Webb et al in birds are already on territory by early spring prep a). Aerial surveys off the Norfolk/ (Migration Atlas), these are likely to be birds Lincolnshire coasts, the eastern Scottish Firths, from Fenno-Scandia or Greenland.
    [Show full text]
  • WEST RIDING YORKSHIRE. 426 Workman William, Confectioner, 164: Gibbet Street Wynn & 'Firth, Jfnen Drapeta, Li, Fj &
    WEST RIDING YORKSHIRE. 426 Workman William, confectioner, 164: Gibbet street Wynn & 'Firth, Jfnen drapeta, li, fJ & ,. WooTshops Wormald Jonas, Bhopkeeper, 146 Booth Town road Yates Alfred, engineer's tool maker, West parade Worsick Richard, maltster, 8 Sa vile ter. Sa\'tle Park \'oad Yates Emanuel, greengrocer, 113 Gibbet street Worsnop Chas. & Co. fancy goods importers, 2 & 4 Cheapside Yates Ann (Mrs.), grocer, 2 Stone street, Caddy fleld Wortley John, grocer, 38 Great Albion street Yates George, ~een~cer 30 Gibbet street Wright David, cattle dealer, 17 Clare roarl Yates George, Old King Cron Inn 111 King Cross 'rOad Wrigbt George William, confectioner (who.}, Thompson st Yates Sarah (Mrs.), shopkeeper, 82 Clarence streflt Wright Henry, draper, 164. Booth Town road Yates William Speakman, machine maker, Booth town Wright James, law stationer, 1 Upper George yard Yorkshire Boot ~ Shoe Co. 2 Crossley st-reet Wright John Hodgson, surgeon,8 Park Road villas Yorkshirs Penny Bank (George Rawnsley, tnanaget), Wright Macaulay, milliner, Grove place, Ovendeuroad Waterhouse street Wrights Hodgson, surgeon, 23 Aked's road Yotk.•hirs (West lliding) Artillery Yolunteer1 (21ad) Wrigley Elizabeth (Mrs.), Bull'1 Head,5 Bull green (7th~ 8th batteries) (John B.Holroyde, capt. eommand- Wylde Arthor V. carver&: gilder, 50 Hanson lane ant; Jas. Steele, surgeon), IS Llster street UPPER HALI.AM is a scattered township within the and endowed in 1838 by 1\liss Ph<Bbe SJlcock ; it eonsiste municipal and parliamentary borough of Sheffield, inclu­ of chancel,
    [Show full text]
  • September 2013 Newsletter
    PDGLA PO Box 7976 Great Longstone, Bakewell, Derbyshire, DE45 9AY Web: www.pdgla.org.uk Email: [email protected] September 2013 Newsletter Leys Lane, Little Longstone– PDNPA go out to public consultation on a full TRO Please respond to the consultation and show your support for the proposed vehicle ban. Leys Lane and Chertpit Lane form a through route from the outskirts of Great Longtone (at SK197722), which climbs up Longstone Edge, and meets the B6465 (also known as Castlegate Lane) at SK183728. Although local people often refer to the whole route as Chertpit Lane, it is really two separate lanes. It is important to get the correct name (Leys Lane) when responding to the consultation. The sketch map shows the location of the two routes. Both of these routes are BOATs (Byways Open to All Traffic). The Xs on the map shows the start and finish of the proposed TRO (Traffic Regulation Order). Leys Lane is an old, narrow route which developed in the eighteenth century to allow farmers access to their fields. The Chertpit Lane section is newer and wider and was described in the Wardlow and Longstone Enclosure Award of 1810. Leys Lane passes over a pastoral, limestone landscape and offers extensive views over the surrounding countryside. General view from Leys Lane. Photo: September 2012 before DCC repaired the surface. 1 DCC repaired the route surface in late 2012. Initially this improved the route for all users. But some of the planings fused in the summer heatwave and the lose stones on the surface are making the route slippery for cyclists.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Landscape
    Our Landscape Defining Sheffield Lakeland The Sheffield Lakeland Landscape church and nearby Bailey Hill Scheduled Partnership area is bounded to the north by Monument (SM). The western margin the A616 Stocksbridge Bypass and Sheffield includes the Dark Peak Site of Special City and Barnsley MBC local authority Scientific Interest, (SSSI), Peak District boundaries. To the west the boundary Moors Special Protected Area, (SPA), and follows the course of the Little Don river from South Pennine Moors Special Area of the point that it enters Langsett Reservoir Conservation, (SAC). The role of Sheffield top Harden Clough where it reaches the Lakeland’s undesignated valleys as both watershed and then continues south along stepping stone and buffer between the the line of the watershed as far as Stanage SPA and SAC and the city, in the context Pole on the Long Causeway. The southern of the Lawton Review ‘Making Space boundary of the Partnership area skirts the for Nature’ (DEFRA, 2010), is not to be south of the three Redmires reservoirs and underestimated. follows Brown Hill Lane and Lodge Moor Water is a key part of Sheffield Lakeland. Road eastward to the urban edge of the Three of Sheffield’s five principal rivers rise city at Lodge Moor. The eastern boundary of within the Landscape area. A multitude of the Landscape Partnership area follows the fast flowing streams tumble down steep peri-urban margin of Sheffield as far as the sided valleys from the moors to fill the 14 River Don, then continues northward along major reservoirs which help define the area the Upper Don Valley until the A616 crosses and provide water for industry and clean the Don at Soughley Bridge near Deepcar.
    [Show full text]
  • Beak Area Newsletter
    Issue 11 April 2010 W elcome to this edition of the Peak Newsletter. As If you're reading this from a printout, the hyperlinks won't show up (in some cases we do print them). To ever, we're incredibly grateful for contributions and obtain an electronic version in which the hyperlinks feedback. will work, go to the BMC website (www.thebmc.co.uk). Members can have it emailed to them by contacting the The BMC held the 19th meeting of the National BMC office: 0161 445 6111, [email protected] Council on 27 February at which, amongst other items, Area meeting reports were discussed: 'Many of the Area Meetings continue to show very encouraging attendance. It was noted that the Lakes Climbing and Walking Festival takes place in the Duddon Valley on 25-27 June. The Midlands Area is Contents: becoming closely involved with several quarrying Peak Area Meetings issues in Leicestershire with the support of the BMC office. It was noted that the BMC supported the The Peak Area Reps speak proposals to extend the Lakes District and Yorkshire Dales National Parks. It was also agreed that the BMC ShAFF Review should support a mountaineering presence at the National Eisteddfod which is being held in South Be Prepared! Wales this year.' Of note, the Sheffield Hallam University Climbing Club were accepted for BMC Access Notes membership but disappointing that the Peak Area didn't get more of a mention. Perhaps we can rectify Last Night of the Big Snow this before the next National Council meeting with a record turnout at the next Peak Area meeting..
    [Show full text]
  • Green Routes - November 2015 Finkle Street Old Denaby Bromley Hoober Bank
    Langsett Reservoir Newhill Bow Broom Hingcliff Hill Pilley Green Tankersley Elsecar Roman Terrace Upper Midhope Upper Tankersley SWINTON Underbank Reservoir Midhopestones Green Moor Wortley Lea Brook Swinton Bridge Midhope Reservoir Hunshelf Bank Smithy Moor Green Routes - November 2015 Finkle Street Old Denaby Bromley Hoober Bank Gosling Spring Street Horner House Low Harley Barrow Midhope Moors Piccadilly Barnside Moor Wood Willows Howbrook Harley Knoll Top Cortworth Fenny Common Ings Stocksbridge Hoober Kilnhurst Thorncliffe Park Sugden Clough Spink Hall Wood Royd Wentworth Warren Hood Hill High Green Bracken Moor Howbrook Reservoir Potter Hill East Whitwell Carr Head Whitwell Moor Hollin Busk Sandhill Royd Hooton Roberts Nether Haugh ¯ River Don Calf Carr Allman Well Hill Lane End Bolsterstone Ryecroft Charltonbrook Hesley Wood Dog Kennel Pond Bitholmes Wood B Ewden Village Morley Pond Burncross CHAPELTOWN White Carr la Broomhead Reservoir More Hall Reservoir U c Thorpe Hesley Wharncliffe Chase k p Thrybergh Wigtwizzle b Scholes p Thorpe Common Greasbrough Oaken Clough Wood Seats u e Wingfield Smithy Wood r Brighthorlmlee Wharncliffe Side n Greno Wood Whitley Keppel's Column Parkgate Aldwarke Grenoside V D Redmires Wood a Kimberworth Park Smallfield l o The Wheel l Dropping Well Northfield Dalton Foldrings e n Ecclesfield y Grange Lane Dalton Parva Oughtibridge St Ann's Eastwood Ockley Bottom Oughtibridg e Kimberworth Onesacr e Thorn Hill East Dene Agden Dalton Magna Coldwell Masbrough V Bradgate East Herringthorpe Nether Hey Shiregreen
    [Show full text]
  • Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009
    The River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater threshold values (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009 The Secretary of State and the Welsh Ministers, with the agreement of the Secretary of State to the extent that there is any effect in England or those parts of Wales that are within the catchment areas of the rivers Dee, Wye and Severn, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 40(2) of the Environment Act 1995(a) and now vested in them(b), and having consulted the Environment Agency, hereby give the following Directions to the Environment Agency for the implementation of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy(c): Citation and commencement and extent 1.—(1) These Directions may be cited as the River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater threshold values (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Direction 2009 and shall come into force on 22nd December 2009. Interpretation 2.—(1) In these Directions— ―the Agency‖ means the Environment Agency; ―the Groundwater Directive‖ means Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration(d); ―the Priority Substances Directive‖ means Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy(e); ―threshold value‖ has the same meaning as in the Groundwater Directive; and ―the Directive‖ means Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23rd October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.
    [Show full text]
  • South Yorkshire
    INDUSTRIAL HISTORY of SOUTH RKSHI E Association for Industrial Archaeology CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 6 STEEL 26 10 TEXTILE 2 FARMING, FOOD AND The cementation process 26 Wool 53 DRINK, WOODLANDS Crucible steel 27 Cotton 54 Land drainage 4 Wire 29 Linen weaving 54 Farm Engine houses 4 The 19thC steel revolution 31 Artificial fibres 55 Corn milling 5 Alloy steels 32 Clothing 55 Water Corn Mills 5 Forging and rolling 33 11 OTHER MANUFACTUR- Windmills 6 Magnets 34 ING INDUSTRIES Steam corn mills 6 Don Valley & Sheffield maps 35 Chemicals 56 Other foods 6 South Yorkshire map 36-7 Upholstery 57 Maltings 7 7 ENGINEERING AND Tanning 57 Breweries 7 VEHICLES 38 Paper 57 Snuff 8 Engineering 38 Printing 58 Woodlands and timber 8 Ships and boats 40 12 GAS, ELECTRICITY, 3 COAL 9 Railway vehicles 40 SEWERAGE Coal settlements 14 Road vehicles 41 Gas 59 4 OTHER MINERALS AND 8 CUTLERY AND Electricity 59 MINERAL PRODUCTS 15 SILVERWARE 42 Water 60 Lime 15 Cutlery 42 Sewerage 61 Ruddle 16 Hand forges 42 13 TRANSPORT Bricks 16 Water power 43 Roads 62 Fireclay 16 Workshops 44 Canals 64 Pottery 17 Silverware 45 Tramroads 65 Glass 17 Other products 48 Railways 66 5 IRON 19 Handles and scales 48 Town Trams 68 Iron mining 19 9 EDGE TOOLS Other road transport 68 Foundries 22 Agricultural tools 49 14 MUSEUMS 69 Wrought iron and water power 23 Other Edge Tools and Files 50 Index 70 Further reading 71 USING THIS BOOK South Yorkshire has a long history of industry including water power, iron, steel, engineering, coal, textiles, and glass.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanage / North Lees Estate Management Plan
    STANAGE / NORTH LEES ESTATE MANAGEMENT PLAN CONTENTS Chapter 1. Introduction: Scope of the Plan, Description of the Estate, Views of the Estate by some of its key interest groups, Relationship to the Authority's other plans. 2. Stanage Forum – an approach to public participation 3. Shared Vision (a) 4. Goals, Aims and Objectives: Key to the following section of the Plan (chapters 5 to 16) (b) 5. Archaeology / Cultural History (c) 6. Commercial Use (d) 7. Ecology / Wildlife (e) 8. Economy (f) 9. Education For All (g) 10. Farming (h) 11. Geology (i) 12. Landscape (j) 13. Management, Evaluation & Involving People (k) 14. Recreation: (a) 4 Wheel Drive & Trail Biking (b) Access & Rights of Way (c) Access for All (d) Camping (e) Climbing (f) Hang/paragliding 15. Vehicular Access 16. Woodlands 17. Participative Evaluation Appendices Appendix 1: National Park statutory purposes and duty. Appendix 2: What is special about Stanage? (A list of responses to this question and their relative status, when asked of the Stanage Forum). Appendix 3: Consensus building principles. Appendix 4: Stanage Forum Steering Group Members. Appendix 5: Overall structure of the Stanage Forum / Management Plan. Appendix 6: Sustainability Appraisal. (An assessment of how this Plan will benefit future generations). Appendix 7: Groups Involved in the Forum Process List of Maps / Illustrations Ref Title Chapter Map 1 Stanage / North Lees Estate 1 Map 2 Archaeology / Cultural History 5 Map 3 Ecology / Wildlife 7 Map 4 Access & Rights of Way 14b Map 5 Access for All 14c Map 6 Hang-gliding and paragliding 14f Map 7 Vehicular Access 15 Map 8 Woodlands 16 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Baseline Ecosystem Services Assessment of the Sheffield Lakeland Landscape
    A baseline ecosystem services assessment of the Sheffield Lakeland landscape Author: Dr Alison Holt Reviewed by: Dr Jim Rouquette Natural Capital Solutions Ltd Contact details: www.naturalcapitalsolutions.co.uk [email protected] Tel: 07973 332758 Report prepared for: Sheffield & Rotherham Wildlife Trust January 2018 Executive summary The Sheffield Lakeland area lies between the western edge of the city of Sheffield, and the moorland slopes of the Peak District National Park. It encompasses the watersheds of Sheffield’s main rivers, including eight reservoirs that provide drinking water to surrounding areas and beyond. It is also an area important for the conservation of biodiversity with nationally and internationally important habitats and species. The area has a rich cultural heritage and many visitors are drawn to the recreational opportunities and aesthetic experiences that the area offers. The Sheffield Lakeland is also a place where people live and supports livelihoods associated with the land, for example farming and grouse moor management. These activities sit alongside the other values placed on the landscape outlined above, and create challenges for the sustainable management of the area. Declining biodiversity, habitat degradation, diffuse pollution, rising recreational numbers and flooding are increasing pressures. This project uses a natural capital approach to assess the ecosystem services provided by the Sheffield Lakeland area. This will serve as a baseline by which to compare the success of the Sheffield Lakeland Partnership projects. The first step was to understand the extent of the natural capital assets (habitats) in the area. A qualitative assessment was made of the level of provision of the full range of ecosystem services provided by the Lakeland area.
    [Show full text]