DOCSLIB.ORG

Buxton Waters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Buxton Waters EXTENDED PHASE 1 HABITAT SURVEY REPORT Final 3rd December 2010 Buxton Waters EXTENDED PHASE 1 HABITAT SURVEY REPORT Final 3rd December 2010 SKM Enviros Alberton House St Mary's Parsonage Manchester M3 2WJ Tel: +44 161 833 4883 Fax: +44 161 833 4761 Web: www.skmenviros.com COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Sinclair Knight Merz (Europe) Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Sinclair Knight Merz (Europe) Ltd constitutes an infringement of copyright. LIMITATION: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Sinclair Knight Merz (Europe) Ltd’s Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Sinclair Knight Merz (Europe) Ltd and its Client. Sinclair Knight Merz (Europe) Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. The SKM logo trade mark is a registered trade mark of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd. Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Introduction 1 1.2. Site Description 1 2. Methodology 2 2.1. Desk Study 2 2.1.1. Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey 2 2.1.2. Habitats 2 2.1.3. Fauna 2 2.1.4. Study Limitations 3 3. Results 4 3.1. Desk Study 4 3.1.1. Statutory Designated Sites 4 3.1.2. Non Statutory Designated Sites 4 3.1.3. Species Records 5 3.1.4. Local BAP 5 3.2. Habitats 6 3.2.1. Improved Grassland 6 3.2.2. Tall Ruderals 6 3.2.3. Broadleaved Scattered Trees 6 3.2.4. Standing Water 7 3.2.5. Fences and Walls 7 3.3. Protected Species 7 3.3.1. Bats 7 3.3.2. Badger 7 3.3.3. Otter and Water Vole 7 3.3.4. Birds 7 3.3.5. Great Crested Newt 8 3.3.6. Reptiles 8 3.3.7. Other Mammals 8 4. Discussion of Potential Ecological Constraints and Recommendations 9 4.1. Designated sites 9 4.2. Habitats 9 4.2.1. Bats 9 4.2.2. Great Crested Newt 9 4.2.3. Water Vole and Otter 10 4.2.4. Reptiles 10 SKM Enviros PAGE i 4.2.5. Birds 10 4.2.6. Badgers 10 5. Habitat Creation 12 5.1. Habitat Creation 12 5.2. Pond Creation 14 Figures 16 Figure 1 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey 16 Appendices 17 Appendix A HSI Scores 18 Appendix B Photographs 19 Appendix C Desk Based Survey Results 25 SKM Enviros PAGE ii Document History and Status Revision Date issued Reviewed by Approved by Date approved Revision type A1 10/10/10 JAYRES D SELLWOOD 08/11/2010 Final Draft V2 03/12/10 D Watson D Watson Final Distribution of Copies Revision Copy no Quantity Issued to Printed: 3 December 2010 Last saved: 3 December 2010 02:02 PM File name: Phase 1 Buxton Waters Final Author: Jonathan Ayres Project manager: Nigel Robson Name of organisation: Nestle/Buxton Waters Name of project: Buxton Waters Extended Phase 1 Habitat Report Name of document: Buxton Waters Extended Phase 1 Habitat Report Document version: Final Project number: UN12203.08 SKM Enviros PAGE iii 1. Introduction 1.1. Introduction SKM Enviros was commissioned in September 2010 by Nestle UK Ltd to carry out an extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey for the development of a proposed water bottling plant on land to the east of Waterswallows Lane, Buxton (SK078754). This report presents the results of the following: Desk Based Assessment in consultation with Derbyshire Wildlife Trust; and Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey. The survey objective was to assess the site for the potential to support protected species and habitats and species and habitats of conservation concern in order to identify potential constraints to the development. 1.2. Site Description The site is located at Waterswallows Lane, Buxton. The development site is around 7ha in extent. It is situated in an area of agricultural land, used for the grazing of cattle. The site is bordered to the north, south and east by pasture land and to the west by Waterswallows Lane. The site is currently being used for grazing cattle and consists predominantly of improved grassland habitat. The habitats to the north and east of the site contain similar grassland habitats. To the west lies the road and an electrical substation is situated to the far west. To the south the land is bordered by a vehicle depot. Within the site the fields are bound by dry stone walling and wire fences. SKM Enviros PAGE 1 2. Methodology 2.1. Desk Study A desk study was carried out to identify protected sites and species within 1km of the site boundary. This utilised online resources including Natural England’s Nature on the Map1, MAGIC2 and NBN Gateway3. NBN Gateway data was searched and data within 1km of the site covering the last 20 years was included. A further desk based survey for information within 2km was carried out with Derbyshire Wildlife Trust and the Derby Museum. 2.1.1. Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey An extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey was carried out in accordance with the standard JNCC Phase 1 Habitat Survey methodology 4 on 27th September 2010 by Senior Ecologist, Jonathan Ayres. The survey area consisted of the entire site (see Figure 1) and adjacent land (where accessible) and a 500m buffer for great crested newts. 2.1.2. Habitats Habitats were identified according to standard Phase 1 Habitat Survey (JNCC, 2003)5 definitions. Any legally protected habitats and/or other habitats of nature conservation importance, e.g. UK or Local Biodiversity Action Plan priority habitats, were recorded. All patches of habitat greater than 0.1ha were mapped at 1:10000 scale (Figure 1). 2.1.3. Fauna In conjunction with the habitat survey, the potential of the site to support any legally protected faunal species and/or other faunal species of nature conservation importance, e.g. UK or Local Biodiversity Action Plan priority species, was assessed. A Habitat Suitability Index (HSI), developed by Oldham et al. (2000)6 was used to ascertain the suitability of water bodies on site, and within 500m as per standard guidance, where access was available, to support great crested newt. This is a method by which habitat variables can be collected and used together to predict the likely presence of breeding great crested newt. Detailed faunal surveys were not undertaken at this time, rather the potential for the site to support each species / species group was assessed based on the known range of each species /species group and the suitability of the habitats present. In addition, field signs or sightings of such species were recorded as seen. 1 http://www.natureonthemap.org.uk 2 http://www.magic.gov.uk/ 3 http://data.nbn.org.uk/ 4 Joint Nature Conservation Committee, 2003. Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat Survey: A Technique for Environmental Audit, revised reprint 5 JNCC (2004) Handbook for Phase 1 habitat survey; A technique for environmental audit 6 Oldham, R.S., Keeble, J., Swan, M.J.S. and Jeffcote, M. (2000). Evaluating the suitability of habitats for great crested newt (Triturus cristatus). Herpetological Journal 10 pp. 143-155. SKM Enviros PAGE 2 2.1.4. Study Limitations Surveying the site and adjacent land was limited by access constraints. This report serves to indicate the present and potential ecological value of the study area based upon the survey data gathered. As with any survey of this kind, it cannot be seen as a definitive description of the site and its associated habitats and species. SKM Enviros PAGE 3 3. Results 3.1. Desk Study 3.1.1. Statutory Designated Sites Internationally designated sites (SAC/Ramsar/SPA) and nationally designated sites (SSSIs) are listed in Table 1. There were no locally designated statutory sites (LNRs) within 2km of the site. Table 1 Statutory Designated Sites Distance & Grid Site and Designation Area (ha) Direction Description Reference from site (km) Nationally Designated Sites (SSSI) Within 2km Waterswallows Quarry SK 082750 0.69 0.2 S Earth Heritage Site currently in SSSI favourable condition. Duchy Quarry SSSI SK 093767 2.4 2 Km NE Earth Heritage Site currently in favourable condition. The Peak District National Park is located approximately 2km to the east and west of the site. 3.1.2. Non Statutory Designated Sites No local wildlife sites were recorded during the desk study within the site boundary. The nearest local wildlife sites are listed below. The desk based survey information shows these locations in context with the site boundary. Table 2 Local Wildlife Sites Site Reference Area (ha) Ecological Feature Local wildlife sites within 2km Longridge Lane Pond HP121 0.0224 Standing open water Doveholes Dale HP066 6.13 Unimproved calcareous grassland Longsidings quarry HP070 24.5269 Unimproved calcareous grassland Peak Dale/Small Dale HP069 9.19 Unimproved calcareous Quarries grassland Longridge Lane Fields HP082 10.48 Unimproved calcareous grassland on lime soil Combs Moss HP023 245.91 Heather Moorland Railway Land HP026 7.86 Habitat Mosaic Hogshaw (Former sidings) SKM Enviros PAGE 4 Site Reference Area (ha) Ecological Feature Peak Dale Grassland HP067 16.7 Unimproved Calcareous Grassland Victory Quarry HP068 7.6 Habitat Mosaic Dove Hole Spoil Heaps HP169 4.75 Unimproved calcareous grassland on lime spoil 3.1.3. Species Records The National Biodiversity Network hold records for UK and Local BAP species. NBN highlighted recent records for great crested newt, song thrush and reptiles.
Recommended publications
  • Executive Summary: Air Quality in Our Area Air Quality in High Peak

    Executive Summary: Air Quality in Our Area Air Quality in High Peak

    High Peak Borough Council Annual Status Report 2018 and 2019 2018 and 2019 Air Quality Annual Status Report (ASR) In fulfilment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 Local Air Quality Management September 2019 LAQM Annual Status Report 2018 and 2019 High Peak Borough Council Annual Status Report 2018 and 2019 Local Authority Daniel McCrory Officer Department Regulatory Services Address Town Hall, Buxton SK17 6DZ Telephone 01538 395400 ext 4413 E-mail [email protected] Report Reference J3518/1/D2 number Date September 2019 David Bailey and Dr Clare Beattie Report prepared by LAQM Annual Status Report 2018 and 2019 High Peak Borough Council Annual Status Report 2018 and 2019 Annual Status Report (ASR) Air Quality - Derbyshire County Council; Endorsement from the Director of Public Air pollution has a significant effect on public health, and poor air quality is the largest environmental risk to public health in the UK. Long-term exposure to air pollution has been shown to reduce life expectancy, due to its impact on cardiovascular and respiratory diseases and lung cancer. Many everyday activities such as transport, industrial processes, farming, energy generation and domestic heating can have a detrimental effect on air quality. The annual status report is fundamental to ensuring the monitoring of trends and identification of areas of local air pollution exposure. The cumulative effect of a range of interventions has the greatest potential to reduce local air pollution and improve population health, as such the annual status report and associated action plans provide an opportunity to engage a range of partners.
  • A6 Corridor Study Final Report Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council

    A6 Corridor Study Final Report Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council

    A6 Corridor Study Final Report Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council August 2014 A6 Corridor Study Final Report Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for use in relation to the A6 Corridor Study. Atkins Limited assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This document has 202 pages including the cover. Document history Job number: 5115815 Document ref: Final Report Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Rev 1.1 Draft - Client comment AB PB GR GR 14/12/12 Rev 1.2 Draft - Client comment GR AB NM NM 26/2/13 Rev 1.3 Draft - Client comment GR AB NM NM 26/6/13 Rev 1.4 Draft - Client comment GR AB NM NM 31/7/13 Final Draft – Client Rev 1.5 GR NM NM NM 20/12/13 comment Rev 1.6 Final Draft GR NM NM NM 20/02/14 Rev 2.0 Final GR NM NM NM 04/07/14 Rev 2.1 Final GR NM NM NM 31/07/14 Rev 2.2 Final GR NM NM NM 13/08/14 Atkins Final Report | Version 2.2 | August 2014 | 5115815 A6 Corridor Study Final Report Table of contents Chapter Pages 1. Introduction 4 Study Brief 4 Background to Commission 4 2. Setting the Context for an A6 Corridor Transport Strategy 6 SEMMMS 6 A6 to Manchester Airport Relief Road 7 A6MARR Traffic Model 7 Traffic Growth/ A6MARR Scheme Impact 9 Existing Traffic Conditions 12 Understanding Travel Demands 23 3.
  • 9-1-2017 Tunstead Quarry

    9-1-2017 Tunstead Quarry

    Public Agenda Item No. 3.2 DERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL REGULATORY – PLANNING COMMITTEE 9 January 2017 Report of the Strategic Director – Economy, Transport and Communities 2 (i) INITIAL REVIEW OF MINERAL PLANNING PERMISSIONS CODE NUMBERS 1986/9/2/5, 1986/9/2/8, CHA/1173/5, HPK/1181/1091, HPK/022937 AND HPK/030328 UNDER SCHEDULE 13 OF THE ENVIRONMENT ACT 1995: APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF NEW CONDITIONS; AND (ii) FIRST PERIODIC REVIEW OF THE 1946 INTERIM DEVELOPMENT ORDER (IDO) MINERAL PLANNING PERMISSION CODE NUMBER TQ/659A UNDER SCHEDULE 14 OF THE ENVIRONMENT ACT 1995: APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF NEW CONDITIONS AT TUNSTEAD QUARRY, TUNSTEAD, BUXTON APPLICANT: TARMAC LTD CODE NOS: R1/1197/11 and R1/0913/27 1.36.R and 1.36.R1 Introductory Summary New schemes of conditions have been submitted by Tarmac Ltd under the requirements of schedules 13 and 14 of the Environment Act 1995 to update planning controls on future operations at Tunstead Quarry, Tunstead, Buxton under planning permission code numbers TQ/659A (1946 Interim Development Order (IDO)), 1986/9/2/5, 1986/9/2/8, CHA/1173/5, HPK/1181/109, 1 HPK/022937 and HPK/030328. The schemes, together with an Environmental Statement (ES), provide details of the proposed working of the site, environmental protection, the form of restoration and the suggested planning conditions under which the site should be worked. I consider that certain changes to the submitted conditions are necessary and my recommendation relates to an amended schedule of conditions. I do not consider that the amended conditions would restrict the working rights of the applicant so as to provide any ground for a claim for compensation.
  • The Limestone and Dolomite Resources of the Country Around Buxton, Derbyshire Description of 1 :25 000 Sheet SK 07 and Parts of SK 06 and 08

    The Limestone and Dolomite Resources of the Country Around Buxton, Derbyshire Description of 1 :25 000 Sheet SK 07 and Parts of SK 06 and 08

    INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES Mineral Assessment Report77 Natural Environment Research Council 0 The limestone and dolomite Marple resources of the country SJ 98 SK 08 SK 18 around Buxton, Derbyshire .Castleton B Whaley Bridge Description of 1:25 000 sheet SK 07 and partsof SK 06 SJ 97 SK 07 oTideswell 0 Buxton SK 17 and 08 ' Macclesfield - Monyash SJ 96 SK 06 0 Bosley SK 16 D. J . Harrison Contributor N. Aitkenhead 0 Crown copyright 1981 ISBN 0 11 884177 7" London Her Majesty's Stationery Office 1981 PREFACE The firsttwelve reports on theassessment of British National resources of many industrial minerals may mineral resources appeared in the Reportseries of the seem so large that stocktaking appears unnecessary, but Institute of Geological Sciences assubseries. a Report the demand for minerals and for land allfor purposes is 13 and subsequent reports appear as Mineral intensifying and it has become increasinglyclear in Assessment Reports of the Institute. recent years that regionalassessments of resources of these minerals should be undertaken. The publication of Report 30 describes the procedure for assessment of information about the quantity and qualityof deposits limestone resources, and reports26 and 47 describe the over large areasis intended to provide a comprehensive limestone resources of particular areas. factual background againstwhich planning decisions Details of publishedreports appear at theend of this can be made. report. The interdepartmental MineralResources Any enquiries concerning this report may be addressed Consultative Committee recommended that limestone to Head, Industrial MineralsAssessment Unit, should be investigated, and, following feasibility a study Institute of Geological Sciences, Keyworth, initiated in 1970 by the Institute and funded by the Nottingham NG12 5GG.
  • Economy Transport and Communities

    Economy Transport and Communities

    PUBLIC Economy, Transport and Environment Department Service Plan 2016-17 Mike Ashworth Strategic Director - Economy, Transport and Environment Derbyshire County Council Version 1.0: Approved by Cabinet on Visions and Values Departmental Values: The Department has established a set of values that will be key to the achievement of the Council’s Vision. The values of Trust, Ambition, Integrity, Building Positive Relationships, Pride and Valuing Diversity will guide us in the way we deliver services and deal with customers and colleagues. Behaviours that support these values form part of the annual My Plan process. One of the main ways we will measure our success in adhering to these values will be the employee survey results. 1 Contents Page 1. Policy Context 1 2. Operational Context 3 3. Economy and Regeneration 6 4. Trading Standards 15 5. Transport and Environment 18 6. Derbyshire Sports Partnership 30 7. Highways 32 8. Community Safety 40 9. Libraries and Heritage 43 10. Resources and Improvement 46 2 Chapter 1 Policy Context Working with partners, business communities, other local authorities and statutory organisations the Department will strive to make Derbyshire a more prosperous, better connected and safer County with an increasingly resilient and competitive economy. Every opportunity will be taken to support economic growth and encourage the creation of more job opportunities in order to provide a thriving local economy and improve the quality of life for all Derbyshire residents. The Service Plan for 2016-2017 outlines how the
  • Old Moor Quarry (Tunstead) Wormhill Buxton (Np/Hpk/1013/0898, M11781, Jen)

    Old Moor Quarry (Tunstead) Wormhill Buxton (Np/Hpk/1013/0898, M11781, Jen)

    Planning Committee – Part A 13 January 2017 Page 1 7. REVIEW OF OLD MINERAL PERMISSION APPLICATION - OLD MOOR QUARRY (TUNSTEAD) WORMHILL BUXTON (NP/HPK/1013/0898, M11781, JEN) APPLICANT: LAFARGE TARMAC (SITE NOW OPERATED BY TARMAC) Site and Surroundings Old Moor Quarry is part of a wider site incorporating both Tunstead Quarry and Old Moor Quarry. The sites are worked together as one operation by the operator. However, for the purposes of planning, Tunstead is located entirely outside the National Park and thus comes under the planning control of Derbyshire County Council. Old Moor is predominantly located in the National Park, (with a very small area in Derbyshire County Council). Both Tunstead and Old Moor are undergoing the necessary processes to enable the relevant planning authorities to determine modern working conditions. Tunstead/Old Moor Quarry is located approximately 4 kilometres to the east of Buxton and is one of the largest quarries in Britain encompassing an area of over one square mile. The quarry produces a range of limestone products. Tunstead Quarry was established in the 1920s to supply high purity industrial limestone for use within the chemical and other industries. Tunstead has operated under planning controls since 1946 benefiting from several related permissions for the winning and working of minerals and the disposal of mineral waste. Tunstead Quarry and Old Moor Quarry are separated by Great Rocks Dale, a dry valley, within which runs a freight railway line. The quarries are connected by a causeway bridge over the railway. An application was made in 1974 to the Peak Park Joint Planning Board (PPPB) for the majority of the area of Old Moor (and application was also made to Derbyshire County Council for the small part of Old Moor within their administrative control).
  • Desk-Based Heritage Assessment in Connection with a Proposed Energy Reserve Facility at Land to the East Of

    Desk-Based Heritage Assessment in Connection with a Proposed Energy Reserve Facility at Land to the East Of

    DESK-BASED HERITAGE ASSESSMENT IN CONNECTION WITH A PROPOSED ENERGY RESERVE FACILITY AT LAND TO THE EAST OF WATERSWALLOWS INDUSTRIAL PARK, WATERSWALLOWS, DERBYSHIRE September 2017 Our Ref: JAC23653 RPS Suite D10, Josephs Well, Hanover Walk Leeds LS3 1AB Tel: 0113 2206190 Email: [email protected] rpsgroup.com QUALITY MANAGEMENT Prepared by: Dan Slatcher Authorised by: Andrew Stevenson Date: September 2017 Project Number/Document JAC23653/ “Waterswallows” STOR 119 Ltd/ REV0 Reference: COPYRIGHT © RPS The material presented in this report is confidential. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of STOR119 Ltd and shall not be distributed or made available to any other company or person without the knowledge and written consent of RPS. rpsgroup.com CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Site Description ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Scheme Description ................................................................................................................................ 2 Designed-in Mitigation ............................................................................................................................. 3 Project Aim .............................................................................................................................................
  • Statement of Consultation

    Statement of Consultation

    PEAK DISTRICT NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY: LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CORE STRATEGY PRE-SUBMISSION CONSULTATION STATEMENT September 2010 1 Peak District National Park Authority Member of the English National Park Authorities Association (ENPAA) Aldern House Baslow Road Bakewell Derbyshire DE45 1AE Tel: (01629) 816 200 Text: (01629) 816 319 Fax: (01629) 816 310 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.peakdistrict.gov.uk This and other Local Development Framework documents can be made available in large copy print, audio cassette, Braille or languages other than English. If you require the document in one of these formats please contact: Brian Taylor, Policy Planning Manager, Peak District National Park at the address above, Tel: 01629 816303, or email [email protected]. 2 Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Preliminary consultation on Issues, 2004 6 3 ‘Help Shape the Future’ consultation, 2005 8 4 Issues and Options consultation, 2007 10 5 Further consultation on Issues and Options, 2008 12 6 Refined Options consultation, 2009 14 7 Preferred Approaches consultation, 2009 15 8 Consultation under Regulation 27 16 Appendices: 1 Who we consulted on ‘Help Shape the Future’ 17 2 Key points arising from ‘Help Shape the Future’ consultation 22 3 Who we consulted on Issues and Options 25 4 Deposit locations and public libraries 29 5 Key points from Issues and Options consultation and how these were 30 addressed in Refined Options 6 Who we consulted in later stages 33 7 Key issues from Refined Options consultation and how these were 36 addressed in selecting Preferred Approaches 8 Key points from Preferred Approaches consultation and how these were 42 addressed in the Submission Core Strategy 9 Policy development through Refined Options - Preferred Options - 48 Submission version 3 1.
  • Renewi UK Services Limited Service Agreement for the Provision of Waste Management Services

    Renewi UK Services Limited Service Agreement for the Provision of Waste Management Services

    Dated 2019 (1) Derby City Council and Derbyshire County Council (2) Renewi UK Services Limited Service Agreement for the Provision of Waste Management Services L:39241206v4 Contents 1. Definitions and Interpretation .................................................................. 3 2. Term ............................................................................................... 17 3. Extending the Term .............................................................................. 17 4. Due Diligence and the Contractor’s Warranty ............................................... 17 5. Supply of Services and NWTF Services ........................................................ 18 6. Performance of the Services ................................................................... 20 7. Performance of the NWTF Services ........................................................... 20 8. Quality Management System ................................................................... 20 9. Necessary Consents .............................................................................. 21 10. Health and Safety ................................................................................ 21 11. Human Rights and Equalities ................................................................... 23 12. Councils’ Premises ............................................................................... 24 13. Premises Generally .............................................................................. 25 14. Rights of Access .................................................................................
  • Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment Wainright's Quarry

    Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment Wainright's Quarry

    ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESK-BASED ASSESSMENT MIDLAND ARCHÆ OLOGICAL SERVICES WAINRIGHT'S QUARRY BATHAM GATE ROAD PEAK DALE DERBYSHIRE SK17 8AH GRID REF: NGR 408830 376907 PLANNING REF: HPK/2016/0179 STEVE WILLIAMS BA (Hons) JULY 2016 Specialist & Independent Historic Environment Advisors to the Construction & Property Industries © MAS 2016 MAS/434/16 ©Midland Archæological Services Wainright's Quarry Peak Dale 2016 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction and Scope of Study 4 2.0 Objectives and Methodology 4 3.0 Planning Background 5 4.0 National Policy and Local Guidance 5 5.0 Topography and Geology 10 6.0 Historical and Archaeological Background 11 7.0 Cartographic Evidence 12 8.0 Conclusions and Recomendations 13 9.0 Potential Impact 14 10.0 Mitigation 14 11.0 Acknowledgements 14 12.0 Sources Consulted 15 Appendix 1: Colour Plates 16 Appendix 2: Tithe Award Extract 30 Appendix 3: Events 31 Appendix 4: HLC 32 Appendix 5: HER 33 Illustrations Fig.1 Location Map (1:25000) @ A4 Fig.2 Site Location Plan (1:2500) @ A3 Fig.3 Development Plan (1:2500) @ A3 Fig.4 Photo Direction Plan (1;2500) @ A3 Fig.5 Historic Environment Data (1:12500) @ A3 Fig.6 1791 Map of Derbyshire. Not To Scale Fig.7 1822 Inclosure Map of Wormhill Parish. Not To Scale Fig.8 1849 Tithe Map of Wormhill Parish. No To Scale Fig.9 1878, 1896, 1919, 1923 Ordnance Survey. Not To Scale Fig.10 1931, 1951 Ordnance Survey. Not To Scale 1 ©Midland Archæological Services Wainright's Quarry Peak Dale 2016 Abbreviations AD Anno Domini m Metre AOD Above Ordnance Datum NGR National Grid Reference MAS Midland Archæological Services OS Ordnance Survey DA Derbyshire Archives c.
  • Amr 2019 2020

    Amr 2019 2020

    AMR 2019 2020 December 2020 AMR 2019 2020 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Local Development Scheme 4 3 Neighbourhood Planning 5 4 Duty to Cooperate 8 5 Community Infrastructure Levy 18 6 Self Build Register 19 7 Housing 24 8 Environmental Quality 41 9 Economy 99 10 Community Facilities and Services 118 11 Conclusions 158 12 Appendix 1 - Dwellings in the countryside/green belt 160 13 Appendix 2 Applications in the Green Belt 162 14 Appendix 3 - List of Indicators 168 December 2020 AMR 2019 2020 1 Introduction 1.1 The High Peak Local Plan sets the development strategy, strategic and development management policies and land designations for High Peak (outside the Peak District National Park). The Plan was adopted in April 2016. 1.2 It is important that the Local Plan is monitored to identify the need for any reviews to policies or the overall strategy. The Plan details appropriate indicators and targets and implementation measures to enable the effectiveness of policies to be monitored. Monitoring will identify which policies and implementation measures are succeeding, and which need revising or replacing because they are not achieving the intended effect. 1.3 The Council is required to publish information at least annually that shows progress with Local Plan preparation,duty to cooperate and the implementation of Local Plan polices. Regulation 34 of the Town and Country Planning ( Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 details the information the Monitoring Reports should contain. 1.4 This Monitoring Report covers the period from 1st April 2019 to 31st March 2020 and includes the information required under the Town and County Planning (Local Planning)(England) Regulations 2012.
  • High Peak Borough of Derbyshire

    High Peak Borough of Derbyshire

    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 206 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. 206. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Compton GCB KBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC MEMBERS Lady Bowden Mr J T Brockbank Professor Michael Chisholm Mr R R Thornton CB DL Sir Andrew Wheatley CBE To the Ht Hon Merlyn Rees, HP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR THE FUTURE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE HIGH PEAK BOROUGH OF DERBYSHIRE 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the borough of High Peak, in accordance with the requirements of section 6j of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that borough. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 19 August 197^ that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the High Peak Borough Council, copies of which were circulated to Derbyshire County Council, Clerks to the Parish Councils, Chairmen of the Parish Meetings, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of the local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies.