Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment Wainright's Quarry
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESK-BASED ASSESSMENT MIDLAND ARCHÆ OLOGICAL SERVICES WAINRIGHT'S QUARRY BATHAM GATE ROAD PEAK DALE DERBYSHIRE SK17 8AH GRID REF: NGR 408830 376907 PLANNING REF: HPK/2016/0179 STEVE WILLIAMS BA (Hons) JULY 2016 Specialist & Independent Historic Environment Advisors to the Construction & Property Industries © MAS 2016 MAS/434/16 ©Midland Archæological Services Wainright's Quarry Peak Dale 2016 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction and Scope of Study 4 2.0 Objectives and Methodology 4 3.0 Planning Background 5 4.0 National Policy and Local Guidance 5 5.0 Topography and Geology 10 6.0 Historical and Archaeological Background 11 7.0 Cartographic Evidence 12 8.0 Conclusions and Recomendations 13 9.0 Potential Impact 14 10.0 Mitigation 14 11.0 Acknowledgements 14 12.0 Sources Consulted 15 Appendix 1: Colour Plates 16 Appendix 2: Tithe Award Extract 30 Appendix 3: Events 31 Appendix 4: HLC 32 Appendix 5: HER 33 Illustrations Fig.1 Location Map (1:25000) @ A4 Fig.2 Site Location Plan (1:2500) @ A3 Fig.3 Development Plan (1:2500) @ A3 Fig.4 Photo Direction Plan (1;2500) @ A3 Fig.5 Historic Environment Data (1:12500) @ A3 Fig.6 1791 Map of Derbyshire. Not To Scale Fig.7 1822 Inclosure Map of Wormhill Parish. Not To Scale Fig.8 1849 Tithe Map of Wormhill Parish. No To Scale Fig.9 1878, 1896, 1919, 1923 Ordnance Survey. Not To Scale Fig.10 1931, 1951 Ordnance Survey. Not To Scale 1 ©Midland Archæological Services Wainright's Quarry Peak Dale 2016 Abbreviations AD Anno Domini m Metre AOD Above Ordnance Datum NGR National Grid Reference MAS Midland Archæological Services OS Ordnance Survey DA Derbyshire Archives c. Circa Km Kilometre ha Hectare SMR Sites and Monuments Record HER Historic Environment Record ADBA Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment NPPF National Planning Policy Framework PPS5 Planning Policy Statement 5 NOTE Notwithstanding that Midland Archæological Services (MAS) have taken reasonable care to produce a comprehensive summary of the known historical and recorded archaeological evidence, no responsibility can be accepted for any omissions of fact or opinion, however caused. July 2016 COPYRIGHT NOTICE:- Midland Archæological Services retain copyright of this report under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, and have granted a licence to Mr William Bagshawe and his agents to use and reproduce the material contained within, once settlement of our account has been received. 2 ©Midland Archæological Services Wainright's Quarry Peak Dale 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This archaeological desk-based assessment considers land at Wainright's Quarry, Batham Gate Road, Peak Dale, Derbyshire, SK17 8AH. There are no designated heritage assets (Scheduled Ancient Monuments, Conservation Areas, Registered Parks and Gardens and Registered Battlefields) designated on the site. 3 ©Midland Archæological Services Wainright's Quarry Peak Dale 2016 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF STUDY 1.1 This Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment (ADBA) has been researched and prepared by Midland Archaeological Services on behalf of Mr William Bagshawe. 1.2 The subject of this ADBA (also refered to as the Site) is an area of land to the north of Batham Gate Road and to the west of Dale Road, Peak Dale, Derbyshire, SK17 8AH, NGR 408830 376907 (figs. 1, 2). 1.3 In accordance with National and Local Authority guidance, this assessment comprises an examination of evidence held by the Derbyshire Historic Environment Record and the Derbyshire Archives, considers the results of nearby archaeological investigations, incorporates published and unpublished material and charts historic land-use through a map regression exercise. 1.4 As a result, the assessment enables relevant parties to consider the significance of any designated and undesignated heritage assets within the Site, to assess the archaeological potential of the site, and to consider the need for design, civil engineering, and/or archaeological solutions to any potential identified. 2.0 OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY 2.1 The purpose of an ADBA is to gather information on a site or area to assess the potential for archaeological features and the presence, significance and quality of known archaeological sites. Available resources that can be utilised include local Sites and Monument / Historic Environment Records (formerly Sites & Monuments Record SMR), Local History Centre Archives, Aerial Photographs, Historic Maps, Estate Records and other documents. The production of an ADBA helps prepare an informed strategy for any further work required, which may include monitoring, targeted evaluation, mitigation or a full programme of works. The Chartered Institute for Archaeologists defines the standard of an ADBA as follows: ‘An assessment of the known or potential archaeological resource within a specific area or site on land, inter-tidal or underwater. It consists of a collation of existing written and graphic, photographic and electronic information in order to identify the likely character, extent, quality and worth of the known or potential archaeological resources in a local, regional, national or international context as appropriate’.1 1 Chartered Institute for Archaeologists 2014 4 ©Midland Archæological Services Wainright's Quarry Peak Dale 2016 3.0 PLANNING BACKGROUND 3.1 This document is to support a planning application for: Proposed change of use of former limestone quarry previously used for motorcycle training ground to camping and outdoor leisure development, together with associated earthworks and landscaping (HPK/2016/0179), (figs.1, 2, 3). 4.0 NATIONAL POLICY AND LOCAL GUIDANCE 4.1 In March 2010, the government published Planning Policy Statement 5 (PPS5): Planning for the Historic Environment, providing guidance for planning authorities, property owners, developers and others on the conservation and investigation of heritage assets2. 4.2 National Planning policy Framework (NPPF 2012) superceeded PPS5 in March 2012 and states: Local planning authorities should make information about the significance of the historic environment gathered as part of plan- making or development management publicly accessible. They should also require developers to record and advance understanding of the significance of any heritage assets to be lost (wholly or in part) in a manner proportionate to their importance and the impact, and to make this evidence (and any archive generated) publicly accessible. However, the ability to record evidence of our past should not be a factor in deciding whether such loss should be permitted.3 4.3 Local planning authorities should set out in their Local Plan a positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of the historic environment, including heritage assets most at risk through neglect, decay or other threats. In doing so, they should recognise that heritage assets are an irreplaceable resource and conserve them in a manner appropriate to their significance. In developing this strategy, local planning authorities should take into account the desirability of sustaining and enhancing the significance of heritage assets and putting them to viable uses consistent with their conservation; the wider social, cultural, economic and environmental benefits that conservation of the historic environment can bring; the desirability of new development making a positive contribution to local character and distinctiveness; and Opportunities to draw on the contribution made by the historic environment to the character of a place. 2 Planning Policy Statement 5: Planning for the Historic Environment 2010 3 National Planning Policy Framework 2012 5 ©Midland Archæological Services Wainright's Quarry Peak Dale 2016 4.4 When considering the designation of conservation areas, local planning authorities should ensure that an area justifies such status because of its special architectural or historic interest, and that the concept of conservation is not devaluaed through the designation of areas that lack special interest. 4.5 In determining applications, local planning authorities should require an applicant to describe the significance of any heritage assets affected, including any contribution made by their setting. The level of detail should be proportionate to the assets’ importance and no more than is sufficient to understand the potential impact of the proposal on their significance. As a minimum the relevent historic environment record shaould have been consulted and the heritage assets assessed using appropriate expertise where necessary. Where a site on which development is proposed includes or has the potential to include heritage assets with archaeological interest, local planning authorities should require developers to submit an approriate desk-based assessment and, where necessary, a field evaluation. 4.6 Local planning authorities should identify and assess the particular significance of any heritage assest that may be affected by a proposal (including by development affecting the setting of a heritage asset) taking account of the avaliable evidence and any necessary expertise. They should take this assessment into account when considering the impact of a proposal on a heritage asset, to avoid or minimise conflict between the heritage asset’s conservation and any aspect of the proposal. 4.7 Where there is evidence of deliberate neglect of or damage to a heritage asset the deteriorated state of the heritage asset should not be taken into account in any decision. 4.8 In determining planning applications, local planning authorities should take account of: the desirability of sustaining