DOCSLIB.ORG

Scoletoma Zonata Class: Polychaeta, Errantia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scoletoma Zonata Class: Polychaeta, Errantia Phylum: Annelida Scoletoma zonata Class: Polychaeta, Errantia Order: Eunicida Family: Lumbrineridae Taxonomy: Classifying lumbrinerids is noto- postsetal lobes shorter than presetal lobes riously difficult at the generic level (Blake (Fig. 3). Posterior parapodia have postsetal and Ruff 2007). Most recently, Scoletoma lobes only slightly longer than presetal. zonata was a member of the genus Lum- Setae (chaetae): Anterior parapodia with lim- brineris, one that many authors have at- bate setae and simple falcigers or hooks (Fig. tempted to divide due to incomplete descrip- 3). Posterior parapodia with simple falcigers, tions and lack of type material. Frame with multidentate tips, and yellow acicula (Fig. (1992) designated genera based on setal 4a, 4b). morphology: species with composite hooks, Eyes/Eyespots: No eyes (Lumbrineridae, simple hooks and simple limbate setae fall Blake and Ruff 2007). within Lumbrineris and those with simple Anterior Appendages: None. hooks and simple limbate setae fall within Branchiae: None. Scoletoma (Frame 1992). Thus, S. zonata is Burrow/Tube: An active burrower, S. zonata the name currently used (Blake and Ruff does not build permanent burrow. 2007). Pharynx: The jaw (maxillary) morphology has become useful in lumbrinierid taxonomy, but Description the pharynx must be dissected to observe Size: Individuals often large, exceeding 200 them. In Scoletoma species, the maxillary mm (Kozloff 1974) with average sizes 160– apparatus is composed of five pairs of maxil- 200 mm in length and 4.5 mm in width lae: maxillae I and II are of equal length and I (Hartman 1968). The illustrated specimen is without accessory teeth and with attach- (from South Slough) was 160 mm long. ment lamellae, while II has wide attachment Color: Light red orange to bronze and highly lamellae long the posterior edge. Maxillae III iridescent. and IV also have a wide attachment lamellae General Morphology: Long, cylindrical and are pigmented. The final maxillae (V) are worms with a relatively featureless anterior free and lateral to IV and III (Carrera-Parra (Lumbrineridae, Blake and Ruff 2007). 2006). Body: Body smooth, elongated, cylindrical Genitalia: and earthworm-like (Ricketts and Calvin Nephridia: 1971) with no ventral groove (Fig. 1). Body segments total more than 200. First two Possible Misidentifications body segments are achaetous and apodous. The family Lumbrineridae is com- Anterior: Prostomium simple, bluntly posed of burrowing worms with relatively conical, with no appendages (Fig. 2) simple morphology, making taxonomy at the (Scoletoma, Hilbig 1993). generic level difficult and resulting in many Trunk: revisions over time. There are currently Posterior: Pygidium gradually tapers nine species from three genera reported to a point, no appendages (Fig. 1). from central California to Oregon (Blake and Parapodia: Small and uniramous. Anterior Ruff 2007). The three genera are Eranno, A publication of the University of Oregon Libraries and the Oregon Institute of Marine Biology Individual species: https://oimb.uoregon.edu/oregon-estuarine-invertebrates and full 3rd edition: http://hdl.handle.net/1794/18839 Email corrections to: [email protected] Hiebert, T.C. 2015. Scoletoma zonata. In: Oregon Estuarine Invertebrates: Rudys' Illustrated Guide to Common Species, 3rd ed. T.C. Hiebert, B.A. Butler and A.L. Shanks (eds.). University of Oregon Libraries and Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, Charleston, OR. Lumbrineris and Scoletoma. Current individuals occur among holdfasts and in taxonomy of these genera includes mudflats of protected areas (Ricketts and Cal- characters of maxillary (jaws) or setal vin 1971). morphology. Members of the genus Salinity: Found in in salinity from 10 to 30 in Eranno, for example, have setae that Coos Bay. include limbate capillaries and simple Temperature: Collected at temperatures from hooks, but they can also be recognized by 8–18°C in Coos Bay. a support plate between maxillae I and II Tidal Level: High intermediate intertidal to 84 (Frame 1992; Hilbig 1993). Lumbrineris m depths. species have simple limbate capillaries Associates: Associates include other poly- and hooks as well as composite hooded chaetes (e.g. Abarenicola), amphipods and hooks, where Scoletoma does not have tanaidaceans. composite hooded hooks. Abundance: The most common lumbinerid in Lumbrineris currently includes five northern California and in the intertidal north- local species. L. californiensis, L. japonica east Pacific (Hartman 1944; Ricketts and Cal- and L. inflata can be differentiated by the vin 1971). Also common in Coos Bay (Porch shape of their prostomium (Plate 160, 1970). Blake and Ruff 2007). L. latreilli, a cosmo- Life-History Information politan species, is pale red to brown has Reproduction: Eggs approximately 500 µm yellow acicula. L. japonica, a rare species, in diameter. In California, development oc- is reddish-brown and iridescent, and with curs in February (Hartman 1939 in Richards black acicula. L. cruzensis, a subtidal spe- 1967). cies, is recognizable by a single tooth on Larva: Development is direct and adults each maxilla III and IV (Blake and Ruff brood larvae (Crumrine 2001) and 3-setiger 2007). stage larvae have been found along the walls Three species of Scoletoma occur of adult burrows in summer months locally. S. erecta with long posterior post- (Washington, Fernald et al. 1987). setal lobes that stand erect and are irides- Juvenile: cent bronze in color. S. luti (=L. luti) with Longevity: yellow acicula, is very small (under 50 mm) Growth Rate: and has very long posterior postsetal lobes Food: Ingests mud and eats detritus. No ani- (Hartman 1968; Blake and Ruff 2007). mal remains were observed in the guts of Ecological Information Scoletoma sp. (Banse and Hobson 1968). Range: Type locality is Salmon Bay, Puget Predators: Sound, Washington. Known range Alaska Behavior: to western Mexico (Hartman 1968). Bibliography Local Distribution: Coos Bay estuaries and mudflats (e.g. Metcalf mudflat, South 1. BANSE, K., and K. D. HOBSON. 1968. Slough) and outer coast, also common in Benthic polychaetes from Puget Sound, Puget Sound (Kozloff 1974). Washington with remarks on four other Habitat: Substrate includes mud and chips species. Proceedings of the United States and eelgrass areas (Porch 1970). Intertidal- National Museum. 125:1-53. ly in mud, under rocks and amongst mussel 2. BLAKE, J. A., and R. E. RUFF. 2007. Pol- and barnacle beds. Along the outer coast ychaeta, p. 309-410. In: The Light and A publication of the University of Oregon Libraries and the Oregon Institute of Marine Biology Individual species: https://oimb.uoregon.edu/oregon-estuarine-invertebrates and full 3rd edition: http://hdl.handle.net/1794/18839 Email corrections to: [email protected] Smith manual: intertidal invertebrates Seattle. from central California to Oregon. J. T. 11. PORCH, L. L. 1970. Polychaetes of Coos Carlton (ed.). University of California Bay. In: OIMB Unpublished Student Re- Press, Berkeley, CA. port, Summer 1970. 3. CARRERA-PARRA, L. F. 2006. Phyloge- 12. RICHARDS, T. L. 1967. Reproduction and netic analysis of Lumbrineridae development of polychaete Stauronereis Schmarda, 1861 (Annelida: Polychaeta). rudolphi including a summary of develop- Zootaxa. 1332:1-36. ment in superfamily Eunicea. Marine Biol- 4. CRUMRINE, L. 2001. Polychaeta, p. 39- ogy. 1:124-133. 77. In: Identification guide to larval ma- 13. RICKETTS, E. F., and J. CALVIN. 1971. rine invertebrates of the Pacific North- Between Pacific tides. Stanford University west. A. Shanks (ed.). Oregon State Uni- Press, Stanford, California. versity Press, Corvallis, OR. Updated 2015 5. FERNALD, R. L., C. O. HERMANS, T. C. T.C. Hiebert LACALLI, W. H. WILSON, JR, and S. A. WOODIN. 1987. Phylum Annelida, Class Polychaeta, p. 138-195. In: Reproduction and development of marine invertebrates of the northern Pacific coast. M. F. Strathmann (ed.). University of Washing- ton Press, Seattle, WA. 6. FRAME, A. B. 1992. The Lumbrinerids (Annelida, Polychaeta) collected in two northwestern Atlantic surveys with de- scriptions of a new genus and two new species. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. 105:185-218. 7. HARTMAN, O. 1944. Polychaetous an- nelids. Parts V-VIII. Allan Hancock Pacif- ic Expeditions. Reports. 10:1-525. 8. —. 1968. Atlas of the Errantiate Poly- chaetous annelids from California. Allan Hancock Foundation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. 9. HILBIG, B. 1993. Family Lumbrineridae, p. 105-166. In: Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and Western Santa Barbara Channel. J. A. Blake, B. Hilbig, and P. H. Scott (eds.). Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, CA. 10. KOZLOFF, E. N. 1974. Keys to the ma- rine invertebrates of Puget Sound, the San Juan Archipelago, and adjacent re- gions. University of Washington Press, Hiebert, T.C. 2015. Scoletoma zonata. In: Oregon Estuarine Invertebrates: Rudys' Illustrated Guide to Common Species, 3rd ed. T.C. Hiebert, B.A. Butler and A.L. Shanks (eds.). University of Oregon Libraries and Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, Charleston, OR. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chaetal Type Diversity Increases During Evolution of Eunicida (Annelida)
    Org Divers Evol (2016) 16:105–119 DOI 10.1007/s13127-015-0257-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Chaetal type diversity increases during evolution of Eunicida (Annelida) Ekin Tilic1 & Thomas Bartolomaeus1 & Greg W. Rouse2 Received: 21 August 2015 /Accepted: 30 November 2015 /Published online: 15 December 2015 # Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik 2015 Abstract Annelid chaetae are a superior diagnostic character Keywords Chaetae . Molecular phylogeny . Eunicida . on species and supraspecific levels, because of their structural Systematics variety and taxon specificity. A certain chaetal type, once evolved, must be passed on to descendants, to become char- acteristic for supraspecific taxa. Therefore, one would expect Introduction that chaetal diversity increases within a monophyletic group and that additional chaetae types largely result from transfor- Chaetae in annelids have attracted the interest of scientist for a mation of plesiomorphic chaetae. In order to test these hypoth- very long time, making them one of the most studied, if not the eses and to explain potential losses of diversity, we take up a most studied structures of annelids. This is partly due to the systematic approach in this paper and investigate chaetation in significance of chaetal features when identifying annelids, Eunicida. As a backbone for our analysis, we used a three- since chaetal structure and arrangement are highly constant gene (COI, 16S, 18S) molecular phylogeny of the studied in species and supraspecific taxa. Aside from being a valuable eunicidan species. This phylogeny largely corresponds to pre- source for taxonomists, chaetae have also been the focus of vious assessments of the phylogeny of Eunicida. Presence or many studies in functional ecology (Merz and Edwards 1998; absence of chaetal types was coded for each species included Merz and Woodin 2000; Merz 2015; Pernet 2000; Woodin into the molecular analysis and transformations for these char- and Merz 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oxygen, Ecology, and the Cambrian Radiation of Animals
    Oxygen, Ecology, and the Cambrian Radiation of Animals The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Sperling, Erik A., Christina A. Frieder, Akkur V. Raman, Peter R. Girguis, Lisa A. Levin, and Andrew H. Knoll. 2013. Oxygen, Ecology, and the Cambrian Radiation of Animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, no. 33: 13446–13451. Published Version doi:10.1073/pnas.1312778110 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12336338 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Oxygen, ecology, and the Cambrian radiation of animals Erik A. Sperlinga,1, Christina A. Friederb, Akkur V. Ramanc, Peter R. Girguisd, Lisa A. Levinb, a,d, 2 Andrew H. Knoll Affiliations: a Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138 b Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093- 0218 c Marine Biological Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Andhra University, Waltair, Visakhapatnam – 530003 d Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138 1 Correspondence to: [email protected] 2 Correspondence to: [email protected] PHYSICAL SCIENCES: Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES: Evolution Abstract: 154 words Main Text: 2,746 words Number of Figures: 2 Number of Tables: 1 Running Title: Oxygen, ecology, and the Cambrian radiation Keywords: oxygen, ecology, predation, Cambrian radiation The Proterozoic-Cambrian transition records the appearance of essentially all animal body plans (phyla), yet to date no single hypothesis adequately explains both the timing of the event and the evident increase in diversity and disparity.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of National Seminar on Biodiversity And
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION OF COASTAL AND MARINE ECOSYSTEMS OF INDIA (2012) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Patrons: 1. Hindi VidyaPracharSamiti, Ghatkopar, Mumbai 2. Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS) 3. Association of Teachers in Biological Sciences (ATBS) 4. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) 5. Mangroves for the Future (MFF) Advisory Committee for the Conference 1. Dr. S. M. Karmarkar, President, ATBS and Hon. Dir., C B Patel Research Institute, Mumbai 2. Dr. Sharad Chaphekar, Prof. Emeritus, Univ. of Mumbai 3. Dr. Asad Rehmani, Director, BNHS, Mumbi 4. Dr. A. M. Bhagwat, Director, C B Patel Research Centre, Mumbai 5. Dr. Naresh Chandra, Pro-V. C., University of Mumbai 6. Dr. R. S. Hande. Director, BCUD, University of Mumbai 7. Dr. Madhuri Pejaver, Dean, Faculty of Science, University of Mumbai 8. Dr. Vinay Deshmukh, Sr. Scientist, CMFRI, Mumbai 9. Dr. Vinayak Dalvie, Chairman, BoS in Zoology, University of Mumbai 10. Dr. Sasikumar Menon, Dy. Dir., Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Centre, Mumbai 11. Dr, Sanjay Deshmukh, Head, Dept. of Life Sciences, University of Mumbai 12. Dr. S. T. Ingale, Vice-Principal, R. J. College, Ghatkopar 13. Dr. Rekha Vartak, Head, Biology Cell, HBCSE, Mumbai 14. Dr. S. S. Barve, Head, Dept. of Botany, Vaze College, Mumbai 15. Dr. Satish Bhalerao, Head, Dept. of Botany, Wilson College Organizing Committee 1. Convenor- Dr. Usha Mukundan, Principal, R. J. College 2. Co-convenor- Deepak Apte, Dy. Director, BNHS 3. Organizing Secretary- Dr. Purushottam Kale, Head, Dept. of Zoology, R. J. College 4. Treasurer- Prof. Pravin Nayak 5. Members- Dr. S. T. Ingale Dr. Himanshu Dawda Dr. Mrinalini Date Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Annelida) Systematics and Biodiversity
    diversity Review The Current State of Eunicida (Annelida) Systematics and Biodiversity Joana Zanol 1, Luis F. Carrera-Parra 2, Tatiana Menchini Steiner 3, Antonia Cecilia Z. Amaral 3, Helena Wiklund 4 , Ascensão Ravara 5 and Nataliya Budaeva 6,* 1 Departamento de Invertebrados, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Horto Botânico, Quinta da Boa Vista s/n, São Cristovão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20940-040, Brazil; [email protected] 2 Departamento de Sistemática y Ecología Acuática, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Chetumal, QR 77014, Mexico; [email protected] 3 Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP 13083-862, Brazil; [email protected] (T.M.S.); [email protected] (A.C.Z.A.) 4 Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Carl Skottbergsgata 22B, 413 19 Gothenburg, Sweden; [email protected] 5 CESAM—Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal; [email protected] 6 Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen, University of Bergen, Allégaten 41, 5007 Bergen, Norway * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In this study, we analyze the current state of knowledge on extant Eunicida systematics, morphology, feeding, life history, habitat, ecology, distribution patterns, local diversity and exploita- tion. Eunicida is an order of Errantia annelids characterized by the presence of ventral mandibles and dorsal maxillae in a ventral muscularized pharynx. The origin of Eunicida dates back to the late Citation: Zanol, J.; Carrera-Parra, Cambrian, and the peaks of jaw morphology diversity and number of families are in the Ordovician.
    [Show full text]
  • Replacement of Adult Maxillary Jaws in Eunicida (Polychaeta)
    SCIENTIFIC ADVANCES IN POLYCHAETE SCIENTIA MARINA 70S3 RESEARCH December 2006, 331-336, Barcelona (Spain) R. Sardá, G. San Martín, E. López, D. Martin ISSN: 0214-8358 and D. George (eds.) Replacement of adult maxillary jaws in Eunicida (Polychaeta) HANNELORE PAXTON Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, N.S.W. 2109, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] SUMMARY: Replacement of adult maxillary jaws is reported for Diopatra aciculata. The process is similar to arthropod moulting, commencing with apolysis or retraction of the epidermal cells from the inner surface of the old cuticle, followed by formation of the new cuticle. This results in the jaw-in-jaw or pharate state. Ecdysis or shedding of the old cuticle takes place without any splitting or damage as evidenced by complete, fully articulated shed jaws found in the gut. Newly moult- ed maxillae are soft and white until they become sclerotized. The new jaws are about 1.4 times the size of the old ones (moult increment). The same process is expected to occur in all extinct and extant Labidognatha. The Recent Lumbrineridae max- illae may not be of the labidognath type, but probably moult in the same manner. Occasional finds of pharate jaws of the extinct Placognatha indicate that they underwent similar jaw replacement. Not enough is known about Prionognatha, although shedding before replacement may occur. Jaw replacement in Ctenognatha, where the new elements form in sac-like epithelial structures ventrolateral to the existing maxillae, is probably limited to this group. Keywords: jaw moulting, jaw shedding, Diopatra aciculata, Onuphidae, Placognatha, Ctenognatha, Prionognatha, Labidognatha.
    [Show full text]
  • Program & Abstracts
    IPC13 Program & Abstracts 1 Table of Contents Section Pages Welcome 2 Major Sponsors 3 Meeting Code of Conduct 4 Meeting Venue 5 Restaurants 6 Getting to and from Downtown Long Beach 7-8 Presentation Information 9 Overview of the Schedule 10 Detailed Schedule of Events 11-15 List of Poster Presentations 16-22 Abstracts: Oral Presentations 23-37 Abstracts: Poster Presentations 38-58 List of IPC13 Participants 59-64 Notes 65-67 Colleagues Recently Lost 68 2 Welcome from IPC13 Organizing Committee Greetings Polychaete Colleagues, On behalf of the Organizing Committee, welcome to sunny Southern California, the RMS Queen Mary, and the 13th International Polychaete Conference! We hope that your travel to Long Beach was pleasant and that you are ready for five days of enlightening programs and time spent with friends and colleagues. In 1989, IPC3 took place in Long Beach, organized by Dr. Donald Reish. In 2015, Don approached us to ask if it might be possible to bring IPC13 back to Long Beach, thirty years later. We agreed to work towards that goal, and in 2016 the attendees of IPC12 in Wales selected Long Beach as the venue for the next meeting. Unfortunately, Don did not live to see his dream become a reality, but his passion for all facets of polychaete biology is represented in this conference through the broad diversity of presentations that are offered. We know that he would be very pleased and honored by your participation in this meeting. The conference would not have been possible without your support and participation. In addition, we would like to express sincere thanks to those organizations that have supported the conference, either financially or by other critical means.
    [Show full text]
  • Body Size and Segmentation Patterns in Free-Living and Parasitic Polychaetes
    741 Body size and segmentation patterns in free-living and parasitic polychaetes Robert Poulin Abstract: Taxa that include both free-living and parasitic lineages present opportunities to examine if and how the life- history traits of parasitic organisms have diverged from those of their free-living relatives. In a comparative analysis the body sizes and numbers of body segments of parasitic polychaetes of the family Oenonidae were compared with those of free-living polychaetes from closely related families. There was no difference in body length between oenonids and free-living polychaetes. However, the parasitic oenonids attain, on average, a much higher number of body segments than their free-living counterparts. The number of segments per unit body length is also much higher in oenonids than in related free-living polychaetes. This suggests that new segments are produced at a higher rate or for longer periods in oenonids than in free-living polychaetes, in which the proliferation of new segments slows down over time to allow for the segments to grow in size. Given that each segment can produce gametes late in the life of the worm, the prolif- eration of segments in oenonids may be an adaptation to their parasitic life-style. Résumé : Les taxons qui comptent des lignées libres et des lignées parasites permettent d’examiner si et comment les caractéristiques du cycle biiologique des organismes parasites ont pu diverger de celles des formes libres qui leur sont apparentées. Nous avons comparé la taille du corps et le nombre de segments corporels de polychètes parasites de la famille des Oenonidae à ceux de polychètes libres de familles très apparentées.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Eunicida (Annelida) Based on Morphology of Jaws
    Zoosymposia 2: 241–264 (2009) ISSN 1178-9905 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zoosymposia/ ZOOSYMPOSIA Copyright © 2009 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1178-9913 (online edition) Phylogeny of Eunicida (Annelida) based on morphology of jaws HANNELORE PAXTON Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Eunicida have a complex jaw apparatus with a fossil record dating back to the latest Cambrian. Traditionally, Eunicidae, Onuphidae, and Lumbrineridae were considered closely related families having labidognath maxillae, whereas Oenonidae with prionognath type maxillae were thought to be derived. Molecular phylogenies place Oenonidae with Eunicidae/Onuphidae, and Lumbrineridae as the most basal taxon. Re-evaluation of the jaw types based on morphology and ontogeny demonstrated that the labidognaths Eunicidae and Onuphidae have a closer relationship to the prionognath Oenonidae than was previously thought. Lumbrineridae are neither labidognath nor prionognath; therefore a new type, Symmetrognatha, is proposed. Homologies of jaw elements and considerations of functional aspects of the jaw apparatus are explored to present a hypothesis of the Eunicida phylogeny. The earliest fossils are of placognath and ctenognath types, lacking maxillary carriers. While the former are extinct, the latter are represented by the extant Dorvilleidae. The interpretation of relationships between the carrier-bearing families depends on whether the carriers are thought to have evolved once only or twice independently. The similarity of the carrier structure and their associated muscles suggests the former, placing the Lumbrineridae as sister to Eunicidae/Onuphidae and Oenonidae. However, the ontogeny of the eunicid/onuphid apparatus as well as its adult structure differ greatly from those of lumbrinerids, indicating that the lumbrinerid carriers may have evolved independently and earlier than in eunicids/onuphids and oenonids.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Biodiversity: a Taxonomic Inventory of Fauna
    Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna Irish Wildlife Manual No. 38 Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna S. E. Ferriss, K. G. Smith, and T. P. Inskipp (editors) Citations: Ferriss, S. E., Smith K. G., & Inskipp T. P. (eds.) Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 38. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Section author (2009) Section title . In: Ferriss, S. E., Smith K. G., & Inskipp T. P. (eds.) Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 38. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover photos: © Kevin G. Smith and Sarah E. Ferriss Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: N. Kingston and F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 1393 - 6670 Inventory of Irish fauna ____________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................................................2 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................3 Methodology........................................................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Size Diversity and Patterns Within the Annelida
    Genome Size Diversity and Patterns within the Annelida by Alison Christine Forde A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Environmental Biology Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Alison Christine Forde, January, 2013 ABSTRACT GENOME SIZE DIVERSITY AND PATTERNS WITHIN THE ANNELIDA Alison Christine Forde Advisors: University of Guelph, 2013 Dr. T. Ryan Gregory Dr. Jonathan Newman This thesis concerns genomic variation within the Annelida, for which genome size studies are few and provide data for only a handful of groups. Genome size estimates were generated using Feulgen image analysis densitometry for 35 species of leeches and 61 polychaete species. Relationships were explored utilizing collection location and supplementary biological data from external sources. A novel, inverse correlation between genome size and maximum adult body size was found across all leeches. Leeches that provide parental care had significantly larger genome sizes than leeches that do not. Additionally, specimens identified as Nephelopsis obscura exhibited geographic genome size variation. Within the Polychaeta, Polar region polychaete genomes were significantly larger than those of Atlantic and Pacific polychaetes. These studies represent the first exploration of leech genome sizes, and provide base evidence for numerous future studies to examine relationships between genome size and life history traits across and within different annelid groups. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have been extraordinarily fortunate to have a strong support system during my undergraduate and graduate studies at the University of Guelph. A very sincere thank you goes to my advisor Dr. T. Ryan Gregory for his trust, leadership and guidance over the past few years, and for taking an interest in the lesser-loved leeches.
    [Show full text]
  • Polytraits: a Database on Biological Traits of Marine Polychaetes
    Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1024 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e1024 Data paper Polytraits: A database on biological traits of marine polychaetes Sarah Faulwetter†,‡, Vasiliki Markantonatou§,|, Christina Pavloudi‡,¶, Nafsika Papageorgiou‡, Kleoniki Keklikoglou‡, Eva Chatzinikolaou‡, Evangelos Pafilis‡, Georgios Chatzigeorgiou‡, Katerina Vasileiadou‡,#, Thanos Dailianis‡‡, Lucia Fanini , Panayota Koulouri‡, Christos Arvanitidis‡ † National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece ‡ Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Heraklion, Crete, Greece § Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Heraklion, Greece | Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy ¶ Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Ghent, 9000 Gent, Belgium, Department of Microbial Ecophysiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bremen, 28359, Bremen, Germany # Department of Biology, University of Patras, Rio, Patras, Greece Corresponding author: Sarah Faulwetter ([email protected]) Academic editor: Cynthia Parr Received: 18 Nov 2013 | Accepted: 16 Jan 2014 | Published: 17 Jan 2014 Citation: Faulwetter S, Markantonatou V, Pavloudi C, Papageorgiou N, Keklikoglou K, Chatzinikolaou E, Pafilis E, Chatzigeorgiou G, Vasileiadou K, Dailianis T, Fanini L, Koulouri P, Arvanitidis C (2014) Polytraits: A database on biological traits of marine polychaetes. Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1024. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e1024 Abstract The study of ecosystem functioning – the role which organisms play in an ecosystem – is becoming increasingly important in marine ecological research.
    [Show full text]