DOCSLIB.ORG

Field Events

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

USATF Masters Championship Meet Hy-Tek's MEET MANAGER 3:16 PM 06-Jul-16 Page 1 2016 USATF National Masters Outdoor T& F Championship - 14-Jul-16 to 17-Jul-16 * = guest athlete Grand Valley State University Meet Program - Friday Field Event 206 W60-89 Long Jump Pit 1 (18) Friday 15-Jul-16 - 8:00 AM Pos Comp# Name Age Team Seed Mark Finals Place Flight 1 of 1 Finals 1 Krug, Gloria W85 Philadelphia, New Oxford, ND______________________ _______ 2 Meiler, Florence W82 Mass Velocit, Shelburne, V ND______________________ _______ 3 Simpson, Jane W75 Tnt Internat, Wayne, NJ ND______________________ _______ 4 Carter, Ann W74 Atlanta Trac, Aiken, SC ND______________________ _______ 5 Primmer, Cathy W73 Philadelphia, Muncie, IN ND______________________ _______ 6 Sarnaik, Sharada W70 Playmakers E, Grosse Point ND______________________ _______ 7 Raham, Sharon W70 Colorado Mas, Wellington, ND______________________ _______ 8 Warren, Barbara W69 Capital City, Charleston, ND______________________ _______ 9 Nesbihal-Cordero, Susan W67 Tnt Internat, Islip Terrac ND______________________ _______ 10 Trotto, Mary W69 Tnt Internat, Kihei, HI ND______________________ _______ 11 *Nesterenko - Can, Louise - Canada W65 Canada, Calgary, AB X2.67m______________________ _______ 12 Matthews, Brenda W67 SC Striders, Anaheim, CA 3.55m______________________ _______ 13 Woods, Lydia W62 Tnt Internat, Sun City, AZ ND______________________ _______ 14 Cohn, Linda W63 SC Striders, Northridge, C ND______________________ _______ 15 Zukas, Donna W60 Unattached, Apollo, PA 2.80m______________________ _______ 16 *Amerongen, Loretta - Canada W62 Canada, Edmonton, AB X3.10m______________________ _______ 17 Kay, Mary-Chris W62 Unattached, Perrysburg, OH 3.30m______________________ _______ 18 Hanscom, Rita W62 SC Striders, San Diego, CA 4.08m______________________ _______ Event 205 W50-59 Long Jump Pit 1 (10) Friday 15-Jul-16 - 9:15 AM Pos Comp# Name Age Team Seed Mark Finals Place Flight 1 of 1 Finals 1 Phelps, Jo W57 Tnt Internat, Clermont, FL ND______________________ _______ 2 Muchmore, Debbie W57 Unattached, St. Charles, M 2.80m______________________ _______ 3 Fox, Vicki W57 Northport Ru, Centerport, 3.65m______________________ _______ 4 Meko, Jennifer W51 Unattached, Nashville, TN 3.85m______________________ _______ 5 Richburg, Ginny W57 Mass Velocit, Randolph Cen 3.95m______________________ _______ 6 Upshaw, Joy W55 Unattached, Lafayette, CA 4.68m______________________ _______ 7 Francois, Shannan W50 Unattached, Galena, OH ND______________________ _______ 8 Carty, Linda W50 Southwest Sp, Bellaire, TX 4.00m______________________ _______ 9 Shannon, Janean W53 Unattached, Bluffton, OH 4.11m______________________ _______ 10 Connolly, Rebecca W50 Mass Velocit, Wilmington, 4.27m______________________ _______ USATF Masters Championship Meet Hy-Tek's MEET MANAGER 3:16 PM 06-Jul-16 Page 2 2016 USATF National Masters Outdoor T& F Championship - 14-Jul-16 to 17-Jul-16 * = guest athlete Grand Valley State University Meet Program - Friday Field Event 200 W30-49 Long Jump (11) Friday 15-Jul-16 - 10:30 AM Pos Comp# Name Age Team Seed Mark Finals Place Flight 1 of 1 Finals 1 Scott, Marioky W47 Unattached, Hampton, VA 4.02m______________________ _______ 2 Dorman, Christine W47 Philadelphia, Pine Grove M 4.19m______________________ _______ 3 Battle, Tracey W49 Potomac Vall, Silver Sprin ND______________________ _______ 4 Haddad, Amy W49 Unattached, Bradenton, FL ND______________________ _______ 5 Travis, Catresea W42 Unattached, Richton Park, ND______________________ _______ 6 Cypress, Jill W44 Tnt Internat, Lancaster, P ND______________________ _______ 7 Dierauer, Isabelle W43 Southwest Sp, Jamestown, O ND______________________ _______ 8 Kent, Dawn W42 Tnt Internat, Newark, DE ND______________________ _______ 9 Sluder, Anne W43 Carolinas Tr, Pineville, N 5.00m______________________ _______ 10 Coletta, Shara W38 Marin Waves, Tiburon, CA ND______________________ _______ 11 McAllister, Shameika W39 Unattached, Desoto, TX 5.00m______________________ _______ Event 710 M75-94 Long Jump Pit 1 (10) Friday 15-Jul-16 - 11:45 AM Pos Comp# Name Age Team Seed Mark Finals Place Flight 1 of 1 Finals 1 Roudebush, George M91 Over The Hil, Chardon, OH 1.80m______________________ _______ 2 Soller, Richard M89 Unattached, North Bend, OH ND______________________ _______ 3 Raynor, Alan M85 Unattached, Lake Orion, MI ND______________________ _______ 4 Jankovich, William M82 Unattached, Racine, WI 3.00m______________________ _______ 5 Miller, Samuel M83 Unattached, Hollywood, FL 3.30m______________________ _______ 6 Sagedahl, Sherwood M77 Unattached, Fairmont, MN ND______________________ _______ 7 Harwood, Jerry M77 So Cal Track, Oxnard, CA ND______________________ _______ 8 Cormier, Roland M76 Shore Athlet, Jackson, NJ ND______________________ _______ 9 Vergin, Roger M78 Club Northwe, Poulsbo, WA 3.60m______________________ _______ 10 Pawlik, Emil M77 Dallas Maste, Jackson, MS 3.87m______________________ _______ Event 709 M70 Long Jump Pit 1 (12) Friday 15-Jul-16 - 1:15 PM Pos Comp# Name Age Team Seed Mark Finals Place Flight 1 of 1 Finals 1 Schrage, Dennis M71 Unattached, Grayslake, IL ND______________________ _______ 2 Booth, Howard M72 Unattached, Gregory, MI ND______________________ _______ 3 Savenas, Leon M71 Unattached, Naples, FL ND______________________ _______ 4 Morris Jr, Rufus M71 SC Striders, Grovetown, GA ND______________________ _______ 5 Youssefi, Parviz M73 Unattached, Gainesville, V ND______________________ _______ 6 Angus, William M73 Unattached, Twinsburg, OH ND______________________ _______ 7 Harbulak, John M70 Bohemia Trac, Sarasota, FL ND______________________ _______ 8 Zukas, Robert M72 Philadelphia, Saxonburg, P 3.20m______________________ _______ 9 Stellato, Domenic M72 Philadelphia, Doylestown, 3.21m______________________ _______ 10 Morgan, Curtis M73 Philadelphia, Falls Church 3.80m______________________ _______ 11 Tetzlaff, Harold M70 Unattached, Green Bay, WI 3.94m______________________ _______ 12 Sharps, Jim M71 Tnt Internat, Smithfield, 4.29m______________________ _______ USATF Masters Championship Meet Hy-Tek's MEET MANAGER 3:16 PM 06-Jul-16 Page 3 2016 USATF National Masters Outdoor T& F Championship - 14-Jul-16 to 17-Jul-16 * = guest athlete Grand Valley State University Meet Program - Friday Field Event 704 M45 Long Jump (14) Friday 15-Jul-16 - 2:45 PM Pos Comp# Name Age Team Seed Mark Finals Place Flight 1 of 1 Finals 1 Aka-Bashorun, Wale M45 Unattached, Novato, CA ND______________________ _______ 2 Oneal Jr, Ralph M49 Unattached, Pueblo, CO ND______________________ _______ 3 Ash, David M45 Tnt Internat, Spring Valle ND______________________ _______ 4 Samiec, James M49 Potomac Vall, Trappe, MD ND______________________ _______ 5 Pye, Derek M48 Southwest Sp, Long Beach, ND______________________ _______ 6 Schloot, Andy M49 Unattached, Indianapolis, 2.30m______________________ _______ 7 Blackman, Joe M45 So Cal Track, Sierra Madre 4.71m______________________ _______ 8 Allwine, Tim M47 Unattached, Paragon, IN 4.95m______________________ _______ 9 Buchsieb, Bennett M48 So Cal Track, Englewood, C 5.12m______________________ _______ 10 Dolezilek, Shawn M45 Unattached, Topeka, KS 5.20m______________________ _______ 11 Croll, Matt M45 Unattached, Naperville, IL 5.30m______________________ _______ 12 Mehl, Jonathan M46 Dearborn Tra, Canton, MI 5.47m______________________ _______ 13 Damalas, Nick M47 Greater Phil, Plymouth Mee 5.85m______________________ _______ 14 Muhammad, Fahim M46 Five Alive B, South Hollan 6.29m______________________ _______ Event 701 M40 Long Jump (10) Friday 15-Jul-16 - 4:00 PM Pos Comp# Name Age Team Seed Mark Finals Place Flight 1 of 1 Finals 1 Phillips, Clinton - Unknown M41 2nd.MD Racin, Houston, TX ND______________________ _______ 2 Moore II, Stephen M42 Unattached, Olivet, MI ND______________________ _______ 3 Mathews, Carlos M43 Tnt Internat, Lincoln Univ ND______________________ _______ 4 Gobble, Kevin M40 Piedmont Pac, Whitsett, NC ND______________________ _______ 5 Waters, Shane M43 Unattached, Idaho Falls, I ND______________________ _______ 6 Bell, Roderick M43 Port City Tr, Wilmington, ND______________________ _______ 7 Simmons Sr, Dion M44 Agape Stride, Decatur, IL 5.08m______________________ _______ 8 Murdock, Daniel M42 Tnt Internat, Brookville, 5.50m______________________ _______ 9 Robbins, Josh M40 Arizona Flam, Gilbert, AZ 5.65m______________________ _______ 10 Arnold, Rob M40 Unattached, Louisville, KY 6.00m______________________ _______ Event 700 M30-39 Long Jump (10) Friday 15-Jul-16 - 5:15 PM Pos Comp# Name Age Team Seed Mark Finals Place Flight 1 of 1 Finals 1 Porter Jr, John M37 Tnt Internat, Ellicott Cit ND______________________ _______ 2 Melton, Jason M39 2nd.MD Racin, Houston, TX ND______________________ _______ 3 Short, Alfred M36 Unattached, Columbus, OH 6.17m______________________ _______ 4 Willig, Kirk M36 Unattached, West Chester, 6.20m______________________ _______ 5 Sullivan, Michael M35 Unattached, Gilroy, CA 6.28m______________________ _______ 6 Wilks, Quinton M35 Kansas City, Olathe, KS 6.35m______________________ _______ 7 *Ianos, Daniel - Romamia M31 Potomac Vall, Washington, XND______________________ _______ 8 Caine, Justin M33 Unattached, Lansing, MI 4.45m______________________ _______ 9 Raisbeck, Greg M34 Unattached, Ofallon, MO 6.20m______________________ _______ 10 Morgan, Adriel M33 Unattached, Wyoming, MI 6.98m______________________ _______ USATF Masters Championship Meet Hy-Tek's MEET MANAGER 3:16 PM 06-Jul-16
Recommended publications
  • Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592

    Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592

    Technical Data Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592 Topic Page Description 2 Heater Element Selection Procedure 2 Index to Heater Element Selection Tables 5 Heater Element Selection Tables 6 Additional Resources These documents contain additional information concerning related products from Rockwell Automation. Resource Description Industrial Automation Wiring and Grounding Guidelines, publication 1770-4.1 Provides general guidelines for installing a Rockwell Automation industrial system. Product Certifications website, http://www.ab.com Provides declarations of conformity, certificates, and other certification details. You can view or download publications at http://www.rockwellautomation.com/literature/. To order paper copies of technical documentation, contact your local Allen-Bradley distributor or Rockwell Automation sales representative. For Application on Bulletin 100/500/609/1200 Line Starters Heater Element Specifications Eutectic Alloy Overload Relay Heater Elements Type J — CLASS 10 Type P — CLASS 20 (Bul. 600 ONLY) Type W — CLASS 20 Type WL — CLASS 30 Note: Heater Element Type W/WL does not currently meet the material Type W Heater Elements restrictions related to EU ROHS Description The following is for motors rated for Continuous Duty: For motors with marked service factor of not less than 1.15, or Overload Relay Class Designation motors with a marked temperature rise not over +40 °C United States Industry Standards (NEMA ICS 2 Part 4) designate an (+104 °F), apply application rules 1 through 3. Apply application overload relay by a class number indicating the maximum time in rules 2 and 3 when the temperature difference does not exceed seconds at which it will trip when carrying a current equal to 600 +10 °C (+18 °F).
  • K-12 Individual No. Name Team Gr Rate Pts Tbrk1 Tbrk2 Tbrk3 Tbrk4

    K-12 Individual No. Name Team Gr Rate Pts Tbrk1 Tbrk2 Tbrk3 Tbrk4

    K-12 Individual No. Name Team Gr Rate Pts TBrk1 TBrk2 TBrk3 TBrk4 Rnd1 Rnd2 Rnd3 Rnd4 Rnd5 Rnd6 1 Chakraborty, Dipro 11 2299 5.5 21 24 43 20.5 W27 W12 W5 W32 W8 D3 State Champion, AZ Denker Representative 2 Yim, Tony Sung BASISS 8 2135 5 20.5 23.5 38.5 17.5 W24 W10 D3 D16 W11 W9 3 Aletheia-Zomlefer, Soren CHANPR 11 1961 5 20 23 35.5 18.5 W25 W26 D2 W40 W15 D1 4 Desmarais, Nicholas Eduard NOTRED 10 1917 5 18 20 33 18 W39 W23 W18 L15 W10 W8 5 Wong, Kinsleigh Phillip CFHS 10 1992 4.5 20 20 24.5 15 -X- W17 L1 W26 D7 W15 6 Todd, Bryce BASISC 10 1923 4.5 17 19 26.5 14.5 W38 D18 L9 W23 W21 W16 7 Chaliki, Kalyan DSMTHS 9 1726 4.5 17 18.5 26 15 W46 L16 W28 W22 D5 W17 8 Li, Bohan UHS 9 2048 4 22 25 29 18 W30 W11 W45 W9 L1 L4 9 Mittal, Rohan CFHS 9 1916 4 19.5 20.5 23 17 W47 W22 W6 L8 W20 L2 10 Pennock, Joshua CFHS 10 1682 4 19 22 24 14 W31 L2 W25 W21 L4 W29 11 Aradhyula, Sumhith CFHS 9 1631 4 18 20 22 14 W41 L8 W38 W13 L2 W19 12 Johnston, Nicolas Godfrey CFHS 9 1803 4 18 19.5 21 13 W43 L1 W29 L17 W24 W20 13 Martis, Tyler BRHS 12 1787 4 17 18 21 13 W42 L15 W24 L11 W18 W22 14 Plumb, Justin Rodney GCLACA 10 1700 4 16 17 20 13 W51 L32 W19 L20 W28 W27 15 Martinez, Isaac GLPREP 10 2159 3.5 21.5 24.5 27.5 16 W28 W13 D16 W4 L3 L5 16 Chen, Derek H CFHS 10 1965 3.5 21 23.5 26 15.5 W35 W7 D15 D2 D17 L6 17 Woodson, Tyler GILBHS 1640 3.5 19 19 17.5 14 W50 L5 W30 W12 D16 L7 18 Cancio, Aiya CFHS 9 1469 3.5 18.5 20 17.5 12.5 W36 D6 L4 W46 L13 W25 AZ Girls' Invitational Representative 19 Folden, Kurt CHANPR 10 1207 3 14 18 12 10 L32 W50 L14 W31 W23 L11 20 Thornton,
  • L-Reactor Operation Savannah River Plant

    L-Reactor Operation Savannah River Plant

    DOE/EIS-0108 Volume 3 of 3 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT L-Reactor Operation Savannah River Plant Aiken, S.C. Volume 3 May 1984 U.S. Department of Energy APPENDIX M COMMENTS AND DOE RESPONSES ON DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT L-REACTOR OPERATION During the 45-day public comment period from October 1 through November 14, 1983, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) received 140 comment letters and statements on the draft version of this environmental impact statement (EIS) . In addition, four comment letters were received after November 14, 1983. Of the total of 144 letters afld statements, 7 were from Federal agencies and 7 were from agencies and off ices of the States of Georgia and South Carolina. Forty- eight statements were presented at public meetings conducted by DOE at Augusta and Savannah, Georgia, and at Aiken and Beau fort, South Carolina, during the week of October 31, 1983. DOE has prepared a public comment/hearing report (DOE /SR - 5009) that includes transcripts of these public meetings, written statements received at the meetings , and all comment letters received by DOE through the mail . This report has been placed in the DOE public documents rooms in Washington, D.C. , and Aiken, South Carolina, and 19 local libraries in South Carolina and Georgia. This appendix presents the individual comment letters and statements and DOE’ s responses to them. If a comment or statement has led to a revision to the text of this EIS, the revision is identified by a vertical line in the margin and a comment letter-number designation.
  • Report- Non Strategic Nuclear Weapons

    Report- Non Strategic Nuclear Weapons

    Federation of American Scientists Special Report No 3 May 2012 Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons By HANS M. KRISTENSEN 1 Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons May 2012 Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons By HANS M. KRISTENSEN Federation of American Scientists www.FAS.org 2 Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons May 2012 Acknowledgments e following people provided valuable input and edits: Katie Colten, Mary-Kate Cunningham, Robert Nurick, Stephen Pifer, Nathan Pollard, and other reviewers who wish to remain anonymous. is report was made possible by generous support from the Ploughshares Fund. Analysis of satellite imagery was done with support from the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Image: personnel of the 31st Fighter Wing at Aviano Air Base in Italy load a B61 nuclear bomb trainer onto a F-16 fighter-bomber (Image: U.S. Air Force). 3 Federation of American Scientists www.FAS.org Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons May 2012 About FAS Founded in 1945 by many of the scientists who built the first atomic bombs, the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) is devoted to the belief that scientists, engineers, and other technically trained people have the ethical obligation to ensure that the technological fruits of their intellect and labor are applied to the benefit of humankind. e founding mission was to prevent nuclear war. While nuclear security remains a major objective of FAS today, the organization has expanded its critical work to issues at the intersection of science and security. FAS publications are produced to increase the understanding of policymakers, the public, and the press about urgent issues in science and security policy.
  • NSS Spring 2019.Indd

    NSS Spring 2019.Indd

    PHOTOBOMB ▼ The accelerators at the Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility produce intense, high-energy electron beams that generate radiographs (x-rays) of nuclear-type explosions. These images help validate computer simulations of nuclear weapon performance. Photo: Michael Pierce IN THIS ISSUE 2 Letters: Innovation National security depends on pioneering scientists and engineers who respond to challenges with new, o en-surprising, ideas. 4 Abstracts: Notes and news from around the Lab Director om Mason takes the helm at Los Alamos, the Laboratory 2 4 wins eight “Oscars of Invention”, and more. FEATURES 10 Faces of innovation: Meet 10 seven scientists and engineers whose 24 groundbreaking ideas, experiments, and data have big implications for national security. 24 Beyond Trinity: 75 years of weapons advances In addition to creating the world’s rst nuclear device, Los Alamos has made nuclear weapons more e ective, safe, and speci c to military needs. 34 Additive manufacturing: The power of powder At the Laboratory’s Sigma Complex, metal components are created with powder, layer by layer, to 34 withstand extreme environments. 44 Analysis: The science of policy ree members of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) share their thoughts on innovation and how having a science background is important for shaping policy. 44 46 Being Essential: The need for speed Je rey Luehring is all about parts —weapons parts for his job in materials management and boat parts for the jet boat he drag races. 48 Accolades: e distinguished 46 achievements of Los Alamos employees. 49 Looking Back: A scuba diver explores the wreckage of the USS Arkansas, which ABOUT THE COVER: was sunk during the 1946 Baker test of Technical Area 3—the administrative 49 Operation Crossroads.
  • Nuclear Weapons Databook, Volume I 3 Stockpile

    Nuclear Weapons Databook, Volume I 3 Stockpile

    3 Stockpile Chapter Three USNuclear Stockpile This section describes the 24 types of warheads cur- enriched uranium (oralloy) as its nuclear fissile material rently in the U.S. nuclear stockpile. As of 1983, the total and is considered volatile and unsafe. As a result, its number of warheads was an estimated 26,000. They are nuclear materials and fuzes are kept separately from the made in a wide variety of configurations with over 50 artillery projectile. The W33 can be used in two differ- different modifications and yields. The smallest war- ent yield configurations and requires the assembly and head is the man-portable nuclear land mine, known as insertion of distinct "pits" (nuclear materials cores) with the "Special Atomic Demolition Munition" (SADM). the amount of materials determining a "low" or '4high'' The SADM weighs only 58.5 pounds and has an explo- yield. sive yield (W54) equivalent to as little as 10 tons of TNT, In contrast, the newest of the nuclear warheads is the The largest yield is found in the 165 ton TITAN I1 mis- W80,5 a thermonuclear warhead built for the long-range sile, which carries a four ton nuclear warhead (W53) Air-Launched Cruise Missile (ALCM) and first deployed equal in explosive capability to 9 million tons of TNT, in late 1981. The W80 warhead has a yield equivalent to The nuclear weapons stockpile officially includes 200 kilotons of TNT (more than 20 times greater than the only those nuclear missile reentry vehicles, bombs, artil- W33), weighs about the same as the W33, utilizes the lery projectiles, and atomic demolition munitions that same material (oralloy), and, through improvements in are in "active service."l Active service means those electronics such as fuzing and miniaturization, repre- which are in the custody of the Department of Defense sents close to the limits of technology in building a high and considered "war reserve weapons." Excluded are yield, safe, small warhead.
  • NYISO Emergency Operations Manual

    NYISO Emergency Operations Manual

    N Y I S O E M E R G E N C Y O P E R A T I O N S M A N U A L Table A.5 List of Thunderstorm Multiple Contingencies Cases Table A.5 List of Thunderstorm Multiple Contingencies Cases 1. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, 311 2. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, 77 3. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, Y94, TA5, Bank (95891) 4. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, Y88 5. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, F31, W81 6. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, W82, Eastview Bank 2S, W65 7. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, W93, Eastview Bank 2N, W79 8. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, A2253 9. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, W75 10. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, 301 11. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, 303 12. W89, W73, W90, W74, Y50, Pleasantville Bank 2, 311 13. W89, W73, W90, W74, Y50, Pleasantville Bank 2, 77 14. W89, W73, W90, W74, Y50, Pleasantville Bank 2, Y94, TA5 Bank (95891) 15. W89, W73, W90, W74, Y50, Pleasantville Bank 2, Y88 16. W89, W73, W90, W74, Y50, Pleasantville Bank 2, F31, W81 17. W89, W73, W90, W74, Y50, Pleasantville Bank 2, W82 Eastview Bank 2S, W65 18.
  • Quick Ship Program

    Quick Ship Program

    LEATHERCRAFT & CATES COVE COLLECTION Comfortable s Beautiful s Liveable QUICK SHIP PROGRAM • 10 BUSINESS DAY PRODUCTION • OVER 75 DIFFERENT FRAMES TO CHOOSE FROM • OVER 160 LEATHER AND FABRIC CHOICES INCLUDING LEATHERS & FABRICS • MADE IN THE USA www.leathercraft-furniture.com 800.627.1561 SOFA GROUPS & SECTIONALS 1690 TIVOLI SOFA OUTSIDE: H33 W87 D38.5 INSIDE: H13.5 W77 D22.5 SEAT: H19.5 ARM: H24.5 1690 926-00 CLOUD NINE SOFA OUTSIDE: H35 W85 D38 INSIDE: H14.5 W71 D22 SEAT: H20.5 ARM: H27.5 926-00 912-00-1R 912-08/16 912-00/96 MAXINE SOFA OUTSIDE: H35 W96 D40 INSIDE: H16 W80 D22.5 SEAT: H18.5 ARM: H24 912-00-1L OR 912-00-1R LEFT OR RIGHT ARM SOFA OUTSIDE: H35 W89 D40 INSIDE: H16 W80.5 D22.5 SEAT: H18.5 ARM: H24 912-08/16 OR 912-08/15 LEFT OR RIGHT ARM CHAISE 912-00/96 OUTSIDE: H W37.5 D69 INSIDE: H W30 D54 SEAT: H ARM: H24 SOFA GROUPS & SECTIONALS 4440 PARK PLACE SOFA OUTSIDE: H32 W87 D38 INSIDE: H12 W72 D23 SEAT: H18.5 ARM: H25.5 SHOWN WITH (2) OPTIONAL THROW PILLOWS. 4440 920-00/40 MANHATTAN SOFA OUTSIDE: H36 W87 D39 INSIDE: H16 W74 D24 SEAT: H20 ARM: H24 LOOSE BACK / ZIPPERED TO SEAT 920-00/40 920-00 MANHATTAN SOFA OUTSIDE: H36 W87 D37 INSIDE: H16 W74 D22 SEAT: H20 ARM: H24 LOOSE BACK / ZIPPERED TO SEAT 920-00 920-02 MANHATTAN LOUNGE CHAIR OUTSIDE: H36 W37 D37 INSIDE: H16 W24 D22 SEAT: H20 ARM: H24 BACK: LOOSE PILLOW BACK/ZIPPER 920-02 920-03 MANHATTAN OTTOMAN OUTSIDE: H14 W27 D21 921-00 MANHATTAN SOFA (WITH WELT) OUTSIDE: H36 W87 D37 INSIDE: H16 W74 D22 SEAT: H20 ARM: H24 LOOSE BACK / ZIPPERED TO SEAT 921-00 SOFA GROUPS & SECTIONALS
  • Installation and Instructions

    Installation and Instructions

    Installation and instructions EN CLOSED WOOD-BURNING FIREPLACES DON’T COMPROMISE. Product Kalfire Product group Wood-burning fireplaces with a lifting door Application Open and closed Models Kalfire W45/48F Kalfire W53/50R Kalfire W60/51F Kalfire W65/38C Kalfire W66/48S Kalfire W70/33F Kalfire W71/62F Kalfire W80/52T Kalfire W85/40F Kalfire W90/47C Kalfire W90/47S Kalfire W100/61F Kalfire W105/47F Kalfire W105/47T Version December 2020 Language English 3 4 Contents 1 Preface 6 5.9 Placing and finishing the fireplace surround 30 1.1 Purpose of this manual 6 5.10 Finishing the Kalfire corner, 3-sided 1.2 Pictograms 6 and room divider models 31 1.3 Warranty 6 5.11 Finishing the Kalfire corner, 3-sided and room divider 1.4 Receipt and verification 7 models with a 7 cm (8 mm) mounting trim 31 2 Safety 8 6 Lighting the fireplace 33 2.1. Installation safety 8 6.1 Lighting the fireplace for the first time 33 2.2 Installation instructions 8 6.2 Opening the lifting door 33 2.3. Kalfire front model in combination with 6.3 Air regulation 34 flammable materials (e.g. a wooden wall) 10 6.3.1 Primary air 34 2.4. Kalfire W53/50R model in combination with 6.3.2 Secondary air 34 flammable materials (e.g. a wooden wall) 10 6.4 Using the fireplace with an open or a closed door 35 2.5. Kalfire W65/38C model in combination with 6.5 Igniting the wood-burning fireplace 36 flammable materials (e.g.
  • W60/W80/W90 Series Shut Off & Divert Valves

    W60/W80/W90 Series Shut Off & Divert Valves

    W60/W80/W90 Series SHUT OFF AND DIVERT VALVES W60/W80/W90 Series Engineering excellence, allied to Shut Off & Divert Valves stringent quality control, ensures that SPX’s unrivalled range of WCB products complies with the highest international APPLICATION When stopping or diverting flow in a process system, the W60 single seat valve standards for hygiene. In the light of line provides both a flexible and reliable solution. These valves are pneumatically growing pressure worldwide to deliver or manually operated, and offered in a wide variety of body configurations. safe, high quality food, all SPX products Available in 1" to 6" OD sizes. are designed for easy cleanability, while Adapters: Refer to page 27 for descriptions of W80/W90 options. minimizing the use of valuable resources, such as energy. The WCB product MATERIALS portfolio includes a wide range of pumps, valves, heat exchangers, mixers Product Wetted: ASTM 316L (UNS-S31603); (DIN-1.4404) and homogenizers designed for use in Non-Product: ASTM 304 (UNS-S30400); (DIN-1.4301) the food, dairy and brewing industries, Seat Material: Tef FlowTM (Std) See Page 3 for other available seat options. as well as in chemical, healthcare, Elastomers: FKM (Std) EPDM (Opt) pharmaceutical processing and heavy FFKM (Opt) industries. Finish: < 32Ra (<0.8 µm) Other finishes available upon request Based in Charlotte, North Carolina, SPX Corporation (NYSE: SPW) is a global Fortune 500 multi-industry manufacturing leader with over $5 billion in annual revenue, PRESSURE RATINGS operations in more than 35 countries and Standard ADAPTer over 15,000 employees. The company’s MAXIUM MAXIUM MAXIUM MAXIUM highly-specialized, engineered products SIZE PRESSURE AT PRESSURE AT PRESSURE AT PRESSURE AT 70°F/21°C 160°F/71°C 180°F/82°C 250°F/121°C and technologies are concentrated in Flow 1.0" 500 375 375 250 PSI Technology and energy infrastructure.
  • Transparency in Nuclear Warheads and Materials the Political and Technical Dimensions

    Transparency in Nuclear Warheads and Materials the Political and Technical Dimensions

    TRANSPARENCY IN NUCLEAR WARHEADS AND MATERIALS THE POLITICAL AND TECHNICAL DIMENSIONS EDITED BY NICHOLAS ZARIMPAS At a time when arms control is being deconstructed by some and a blueprint for its reconstitution is being sought by others, the enhancement of transparency in nuclear warheads and materials as a means to achieve deeper and irreversible nuclear reductions deserves urgent atten- tion. The contributions in this volume map out the progress made and identify and discuss the reasons why countries pos- sessing nuclear weapons are impeding transparency. The main focus is on the technical means and procedures that have been used, are under development or have been proposed for building, strengthening and institutionalizing transparency. The authors analyse the arrangements for the establishment of stockpile declarations, the verification of nuclear warhead status and dismantlement, the storage and disposal of fissile materials, as well as the monitoring of production facilities. This volume brings together a unique and wide body of information and in-depth analysis by an informed group of arms control experts and is expected to stimulate international debate on the subject of nuclear transparency. Dr Nicholas Zarimpas (Greece) was Leader of the SIPRI Project on Military Technology and International Security in 1999–2002. He previously worked for the European Commission and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, where he specialized in the nuclear fuel cycle and the manage- ment of plutonium. During the past 10 years he has acted as scientific secretary to several international technological and policy committees. Other contributors to this volume Dr Gunnar Arbman (Sweden) Dr Oleg Bukharin (United States) Professor Steve Fetter (United States) Dr Richard L.
  • Nuclear Weapons Surety

    Nuclear Weapons Surety

    UNCLASSIFIED Document No: DP-20.1/ 9-21·89 Document Consists of 72 Pages Cy No . ....L, of ..5_ Cys. Series B SEPTEMBER1~ Joint Report by the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Department of Energy :. Nuclear Weapons Surety Annual Report to the President(u.) 1988 NOT FOR PUBLIC DISSEMINATION This document contains information that may be subject to the provisions of Section 148 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 USC 2158). Review prior to release is required. CLASSIFIED BY: CG-W-5, Jan 84 ,,.. ·".( ·-y (" • . ·;L'f.- ,- .\,!. .Ji. -~ .... : UNCLASSIFIED F { "THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK." .It - UNCLASSIFIED SEPTEMBER 1989 Joint Report by the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Department of Energy Nuclear Weapons S~rety Annual Report to the President 1988 Prepared by: The Associate Director for Weapons Program Safety Defense Programs Department of Energy U CLASSIFIED l "THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK." .. SSIFIED JOINT DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE/DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS SURETY, 1988 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At the request of the President, the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Department of Energy (DOE) report annually on the status of nuclear weapons surety. · This report responds to guidance in National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 309 and summarizes surety progress made during 1988 in the areas of: nuclear weapons safety, security, use control; personnel reliability and assurance programs; emergency preparedness and response; and, inspection and evaluation programs. Budget constraints are also discussed. As part of its preparation, this report was reviewed by the Nuclear Weapons Council.