DOCSLIB.ORG

Summer Small Track Arm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summer Small Track Arm THE SUMMER SMALL TRACK ARM CONFIGURATIONS WIDTH DEPTH HEIGHT 61209 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK CORNER CHAIR 41IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61210 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK ARM CHAIR 39IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61211 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK RIGHT ARM CHAIR 35IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61212 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK LEFT ARM CHAIR 35IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61213 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK ARMLESS CHAIR 31IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61215 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK WEDGE 51IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61220 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK LOVESEAT 62IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61221 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK RIGHT ARM LOVESEAT 58IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61222 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK LEFT ARM LOVESEAT 58IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61223 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK ARMLESS LOVESEAT 54IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61230 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK SOFA 89IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61231 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK RIGHT ARM CORNER SOFA 97IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61232 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK LEFT ARM CORNER SOFA 97IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61233 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK RIGHT ARM SOFA 85IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61234 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK LEFT ARM SOFA 85IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61235 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK APT SOFA 69IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61236 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK RIGHT ARM APT SOFA 65IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61237 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK LEFT ARM APT SOFA 65IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61238 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK ARMLESS SOFA 81IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61239 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK ARMLESS APT SOFA 61IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61260 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK CHAISE 41IN. 64IN. 38IN. 61261 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK RIGHT ARM CHAISE 37IN. 64IN. 38IN. 61262 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK LEFT ARM CHAISE 37IN. 64IN. 38IN. 61263 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK ARMLESS CHAISE 33IN. 64IN. 38IN. 61271 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK RIGHT BUMPER 41IN. 85IN. 38IN. 61272 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK LEFT BUMPER 41IN. 85IN. 38IN. 61280 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK LARGE SOFA 99IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61281 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK RIGHT ARM LARGE SOFA 95IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61282 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK LEFT ARM LARGE SOFA 95IN. 41IN. 38IN. 61283 CRAFTED - SUMMER SMALL TRACK LARGE ARMLESS SOFA 91IN. 41IN. 38IN. EST. 1989 // AUTHENTIC HAND BUILT FURNITURE // THOMASVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA THE SUMMER SMALL TRACK ARM 133" 97" SHOWN 61282 LEFT ARM LONG SOFA 61231 RIGHT ARM CORNER SOFA SUMMER SMALL TRACK ARM 1:115 SCALE SHOWN 61209 CORNER CHAIR 61210 ARM CHAIR 61211 R ARM CHAIR 61212 L ARM CHAIR 61213 ARMLESS CHAIR TOTAL W41" D41" H38" TOTAL W39" D41" H38" TOTAL W35" D41" H38" TOTAL W35" D41" H38" TOTAL W31" D41" H38" SEAT W 23" D23" H 19" SEAT W 30" D23" H 19" SEAT W 30" D23" H 19" SEAT W 30" D23" H 19" SEAT W 30" D23" H 19" ARMS --- --- --- ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- --- 61215 WEDGE 61220 LOVESEAT 61221 R ARM LOVESEAT 61222 L ARM LOVESEAT 61223 ARMLESS LOVESEAT TOTAL W51" D41" H38" TOTAL W62" D41" H38" TOTAL W58" D41" H38" TOTAL W58" D41" H38" TOTAL W54" D41" H38" SEAT W 55" D23" H 19" SEAT W 54" D23" H 19" SEAT W 54" D23" H 19" SEAT W 54" D23" H 19" SEAT W 54" D23" H 19" ARMS --- --- --- ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- H 26" 61230 SOFA 61231 R ARM CORNER SOFA 61232 L ARM CORNER SOFA 61233 R ARM SOFA 61234 L ARM SOFA TOTAL W89" D41" H38" TOTAL W97" D41" H38" TOTAL W97" D41" H38" TOTAL W85" D41" H38" TOTAL W85" D41" H38" SEAT W 80" D23" H 19" SEAT W 77" D23" H 19" SEAT W 77" D23" H 19" SEAT W 80" D23" H 19" SEAT W 80" D23" H 19" ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- H 26" 61235 APARTMENT SOFA 61236 R ARM APT SOFA 61237 L ARM APT SOFA 61238 ARMLESS SOFA 61239 ARMLESS APT SOFA TOTAL W69" D41" H38" TOTAL W65" D41" H38" TOTAL W65" D41" H38" TOTAL W81" D41" H38" TOTAL W61" D41" H38" SEAT W 60" D23" H 19" SEAT W 60" D23" H 19" SEAT W 60" D23" H 19" SEAT W 80" D23" H 19" SEAT W 60" D23" H 19" ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- --- ARMS --- --- --- 61260 CHAISE 61261 R ARM CHAISE 61262 L ARM CHAISE 61263 ARMESS CHAISE 61271 RIGHT BUMPER TOTAL W41" D64" H38" TOTAL W37" D64" H38" TOTAL W37" D64" H38" TOTAL W33" D64" H38" TOTAL W41" D85" H38" SEAT W 32" D47" H 19" SEAT W 32" D47" H 19" SEAT W 32" D47" H 19" SEAT W 32" D47" H 19" SEAT W 23" D69" H 19" ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- --- ARMS --- --- --- 61272 LEFT BUMPER 61280 LARGE SOFA 61281 R ARM LARGE SOFA 61282 L ARM LARGE SOFA 61283 LARGE ARMLESS SOFA TOTAL W41" D85" H38" TOTAL W99" D41" H38" TOTAL W95" D41" H38" TOTAL W95" D41" H38" TOTAL W91" D41" H38" SEAT W 23" D69" H 19" SEAT W 90" D23" H 19" SEAT W 90" D23" H 19" SEAT W 90" D23" H 19" SEAT W 90" D23" H 19" ARMS --- --- --- ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- H 26" ARMS --- --- --- EST. 1989 // AUTHENTIC HAND BUILT FURNITURE // THOMASVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592
    Technical Data Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592 Topic Page Description 2 Heater Element Selection Procedure 2 Index to Heater Element Selection Tables 5 Heater Element Selection Tables 6 Additional Resources These documents contain additional information concerning related products from Rockwell Automation. Resource Description Industrial Automation Wiring and Grounding Guidelines, publication 1770-4.1 Provides general guidelines for installing a Rockwell Automation industrial system. Product Certifications website, http://www.ab.com Provides declarations of conformity, certificates, and other certification details. You can view or download publications at http://www.rockwellautomation.com/literature/. To order paper copies of technical documentation, contact your local Allen-Bradley distributor or Rockwell Automation sales representative. For Application on Bulletin 100/500/609/1200 Line Starters Heater Element Specifications Eutectic Alloy Overload Relay Heater Elements Type J — CLASS 10 Type P — CLASS 20 (Bul. 600 ONLY) Type W — CLASS 20 Type WL — CLASS 30 Note: Heater Element Type W/WL does not currently meet the material Type W Heater Elements restrictions related to EU ROHS Description The following is for motors rated for Continuous Duty: For motors with marked service factor of not less than 1.15, or Overload Relay Class Designation motors with a marked temperature rise not over +40 °C United States Industry Standards (NEMA ICS 2 Part 4) designate an (+104 °F), apply application rules 1 through 3. Apply application overload relay by a class number indicating the maximum time in rules 2 and 3 when the temperature difference does not exceed seconds at which it will trip when carrying a current equal to 600 +10 °C (+18 °F).
    [Show full text]
  • K-12 Individual No. Name Team Gr Rate Pts Tbrk1 Tbrk2 Tbrk3 Tbrk4
    K-12 Individual No. Name Team Gr Rate Pts TBrk1 TBrk2 TBrk3 TBrk4 Rnd1 Rnd2 Rnd3 Rnd4 Rnd5 Rnd6 1 Chakraborty, Dipro 11 2299 5.5 21 24 43 20.5 W27 W12 W5 W32 W8 D3 State Champion, AZ Denker Representative 2 Yim, Tony Sung BASISS 8 2135 5 20.5 23.5 38.5 17.5 W24 W10 D3 D16 W11 W9 3 Aletheia-Zomlefer, Soren CHANPR 11 1961 5 20 23 35.5 18.5 W25 W26 D2 W40 W15 D1 4 Desmarais, Nicholas Eduard NOTRED 10 1917 5 18 20 33 18 W39 W23 W18 L15 W10 W8 5 Wong, Kinsleigh Phillip CFHS 10 1992 4.5 20 20 24.5 15 -X- W17 L1 W26 D7 W15 6 Todd, Bryce BASISC 10 1923 4.5 17 19 26.5 14.5 W38 D18 L9 W23 W21 W16 7 Chaliki, Kalyan DSMTHS 9 1726 4.5 17 18.5 26 15 W46 L16 W28 W22 D5 W17 8 Li, Bohan UHS 9 2048 4 22 25 29 18 W30 W11 W45 W9 L1 L4 9 Mittal, Rohan CFHS 9 1916 4 19.5 20.5 23 17 W47 W22 W6 L8 W20 L2 10 Pennock, Joshua CFHS 10 1682 4 19 22 24 14 W31 L2 W25 W21 L4 W29 11 Aradhyula, Sumhith CFHS 9 1631 4 18 20 22 14 W41 L8 W38 W13 L2 W19 12 Johnston, Nicolas Godfrey CFHS 9 1803 4 18 19.5 21 13 W43 L1 W29 L17 W24 W20 13 Martis, Tyler BRHS 12 1787 4 17 18 21 13 W42 L15 W24 L11 W18 W22 14 Plumb, Justin Rodney GCLACA 10 1700 4 16 17 20 13 W51 L32 W19 L20 W28 W27 15 Martinez, Isaac GLPREP 10 2159 3.5 21.5 24.5 27.5 16 W28 W13 D16 W4 L3 L5 16 Chen, Derek H CFHS 10 1965 3.5 21 23.5 26 15.5 W35 W7 D15 D2 D17 L6 17 Woodson, Tyler GILBHS 1640 3.5 19 19 17.5 14 W50 L5 W30 W12 D16 L7 18 Cancio, Aiya CFHS 9 1469 3.5 18.5 20 17.5 12.5 W36 D6 L4 W46 L13 W25 AZ Girls' Invitational Representative 19 Folden, Kurt CHANPR 10 1207 3 14 18 12 10 L32 W50 L14 W31 W23 L11 20 Thornton,
    [Show full text]
  • Influencer Poll: Likelihood to Recommend & Support
    Wave 56 Influencer Poll Update January 2018 Public Release Influencer Poll: Likelihood to Recommend & Support 1 Likelihood to Recommend and Support Military Service Likelihood to Recommend and Support Military Service 80% 71% 70% 71% 70% 66% 66% 66% 67% 63% 63% 63% 64% 61% 63% 60% 50% 46% 47% 47% 45% 44% 42% 43% 42% 39% 38% 40% 35% 32% 33% 34% 34% 30% 20% 10% Likely to Recommend: % Likely/Very Likely Likely to Support: % Agree/Strongly Agree Yearly Quarterly 0% Jan–Mar 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Likely to Recommend Military Service Likely to Support Decision to Join § Influencers’ likelihood to support the decision to join the Military increased significantly from 67% in 2015 to 70% in 2016. § However, Influencers’ likelihood to support the decision to join the Military remained stable in January–March 2017. = Significantly change from previous poll Source: Military Ad Tracking Study (Influencer Market) Wave 56 2 Questions: q1a–c: “Suppose [relation] came to you for advice about various post-high school options. How likely is it that you would recommend joining a Military Service such as the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, or Coast Guard?” q2ff: “If [relation] told me they were planning to join the Military, I would support their decision.” Likelihood to Recommend Military Service By Influencer Type Likelihood to Recommend Military Service 80% 70% 63% 59% 59% 60% 58% 60% 57% 56% 57% 55% 54% 53% 48% 55% 50% 54% 47% 52% 51% 44% 51% 47% 42% 42% 42% 49% 41% 43% 42% 45% 45% 46% 40% 42% 37% 41% 39% 41% 38% 38% 38% 37% 37% 39% 34% 35% 34% 30% 33% 33% 32% 33% 32% 31% 32% 31% 31% 31% 32% 20% 25% 25% 24% 31% 29% 10% % Likely/Very Likely Yearly Quarterly 0% Jan–Mar 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Fathers Mothers Grandparents Other Influencers § Influencers’ likelihood to recommend military service remained stable in January–March 2017 for all influencer groups.
    [Show full text]
  • L-Reactor Operation Savannah River Plant
    DOE/EIS-0108 Volume 3 of 3 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT L-Reactor Operation Savannah River Plant Aiken, S.C. Volume 3 May 1984 U.S. Department of Energy APPENDIX M COMMENTS AND DOE RESPONSES ON DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT L-REACTOR OPERATION During the 45-day public comment period from October 1 through November 14, 1983, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) received 140 comment letters and statements on the draft version of this environmental impact statement (EIS) . In addition, four comment letters were received after November 14, 1983. Of the total of 144 letters afld statements, 7 were from Federal agencies and 7 were from agencies and off ices of the States of Georgia and South Carolina. Forty- eight statements were presented at public meetings conducted by DOE at Augusta and Savannah, Georgia, and at Aiken and Beau fort, South Carolina, during the week of October 31, 1983. DOE has prepared a public comment/hearing report (DOE /SR - 5009) that includes transcripts of these public meetings, written statements received at the meetings , and all comment letters received by DOE through the mail . This report has been placed in the DOE public documents rooms in Washington, D.C. , and Aiken, South Carolina, and 19 local libraries in South Carolina and Georgia. This appendix presents the individual comment letters and statements and DOE’ s responses to them. If a comment or statement has led to a revision to the text of this EIS, the revision is identified by a vertical line in the margin and a comment letter-number designation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sgs01fenstermacher.Pdf
    - ! ,:. Sciena & Global Security, 1990, Volume I, ppo187-223 Pbotooopying permitt£d by license only Reprints available directly from the publisher C>1990 Gordon and Breach Science Publishers SoA. Printed in the United States of America The Effects of Nuclear Test-ban Regimes on Th ird -generation-wea pon I n novation Dan L. Fenstermache~ The primary reason that we are pursuing nuclear directed energy weapons is to understand the Soviets' capability to design and deploy similar weapons,which would put the US strategic deterrent force or a future defensivesystem at risk. Former US Energy Secretary John S. Herrington' It is by no means certain that a Comprehensive Test Ban would prevent the Soviets from developing a new generation of nuclear weapons, although that would assuredly be the effect of a total testing ban on the US. Former Director of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Donald Kerrt Under the rationale of assessing potential Soviet threats, several third-generation- weapon concepts are being actively studied in the US. This paper presents a technical analysis of the physical principles and likely capabilities of three nuclear directed-energy concepts (x-my lasers, nuclear kinetic-energy weapons, and micro- wave devices) and describes the implications for their development of threshold test bans at thresholds above and below 1 kiloton, Inertial Confinement Fusion, special- ized non-nuclear weapon effects simulation, and seismically quiet containment a. Center for Energy and Environmental Studies. Princeton University. Princeton. NJ 08544 Some of ftJ/s research was undertaken while on feUol,I,Shlpat ftJe Center for Science and International Affairs. Kennedy School of Government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Weird Nukes of Yesteryear
    The Cold War produced some oddball weapons. Here are three of them. The “Davy Crockett,” shown here mounted on a tripod at Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland, was the smallest nuclear warhead ever developed by the US. The Weird Nukes DOD photo end of a series of thermonuclear bombs initiated in 1950. This followed the Soviet detonation of an atomic bomb of Yesteryear in 1949, several years before Western By Norman Polmar and Robert S. Norris intelligence agencies expected such an event. y the time the Cold War reached some concern about whether they could It was the era of “bigger is better.” its height in the late 1960s, the be carried in aircraft, due to size. The The zenith of “big bombs” would be American nuclear arsenal had “Little Boy” dropped on Hiroshima seen on Oct. 30, 1961, when the Soviet grown to more than 31,000 tipped the scales at 9,700 pounds, and Union detonated (at Novaya Zemlya in Bweapons. The Army, Navy, Air Force, the “Fat Man” dropped on Nagasaki the Arctic) a thermonuclear bomb that and even the Marine Corps worked weighed 10,300 pounds. The immediate produced an explosion equivalent to to acquire weapons for the “nuclear follow-on bombs were about the same 58 megatons—the largest man-made battlefield,” whether in the air, on the size or smaller. explosion ever achieved. Soviet Premier ground, on water, or underwater. However, the development of ther- Nikita Khrushchev would later write Three of the more unusual—and in monuclear or hydrogen bombs led to in his memoirs: “It was colossal, just the end impractical—of these weapons much larger weapons, with the largest incredible! Our experts later explained were the enormous Mk 17 hydrogen US nuclear weapon being the Mk 17 to me that if you took into account the bomb, the Navy’s drone anti-submarine hydrogen bomb.
    [Show full text]
  • Report- Non Strategic Nuclear Weapons
    Federation of American Scientists Special Report No 3 May 2012 Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons By HANS M. KRISTENSEN 1 Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons May 2012 Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons By HANS M. KRISTENSEN Federation of American Scientists www.FAS.org 2 Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons May 2012 Acknowledgments e following people provided valuable input and edits: Katie Colten, Mary-Kate Cunningham, Robert Nurick, Stephen Pifer, Nathan Pollard, and other reviewers who wish to remain anonymous. is report was made possible by generous support from the Ploughshares Fund. Analysis of satellite imagery was done with support from the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Image: personnel of the 31st Fighter Wing at Aviano Air Base in Italy load a B61 nuclear bomb trainer onto a F-16 fighter-bomber (Image: U.S. Air Force). 3 Federation of American Scientists www.FAS.org Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons May 2012 About FAS Founded in 1945 by many of the scientists who built the first atomic bombs, the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) is devoted to the belief that scientists, engineers, and other technically trained people have the ethical obligation to ensure that the technological fruits of their intellect and labor are applied to the benefit of humankind. e founding mission was to prevent nuclear war. While nuclear security remains a major objective of FAS today, the organization has expanded its critical work to issues at the intersection of science and security. FAS publications are produced to increase the understanding of policymakers, the public, and the press about urgent issues in science and security policy.
    [Show full text]
  • NSS Spring 2019.Indd
    PHOTOBOMB ▼ The accelerators at the Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test (DARHT) facility produce intense, high-energy electron beams that generate radiographs (x-rays) of nuclear-type explosions. These images help validate computer simulations of nuclear weapon performance. Photo: Michael Pierce IN THIS ISSUE 2 Letters: Innovation National security depends on pioneering scientists and engineers who respond to challenges with new, o en-surprising, ideas. 4 Abstracts: Notes and news from around the Lab Director om Mason takes the helm at Los Alamos, the Laboratory 2 4 wins eight “Oscars of Invention”, and more. FEATURES 10 Faces of innovation: Meet 10 seven scientists and engineers whose 24 groundbreaking ideas, experiments, and data have big implications for national security. 24 Beyond Trinity: 75 years of weapons advances In addition to creating the world’s rst nuclear device, Los Alamos has made nuclear weapons more e ective, safe, and speci c to military needs. 34 Additive manufacturing: The power of powder At the Laboratory’s Sigma Complex, metal components are created with powder, layer by layer, to 34 withstand extreme environments. 44 Analysis: The science of policy ree members of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) share their thoughts on innovation and how having a science background is important for shaping policy. 44 46 Being Essential: The need for speed Je rey Luehring is all about parts —weapons parts for his job in materials management and boat parts for the jet boat he drag races. 48 Accolades: e distinguished 46 achievements of Los Alamos employees. 49 Looking Back: A scuba diver explores the wreckage of the USS Arkansas, which ABOUT THE COVER: was sunk during the 1946 Baker test of Technical Area 3—the administrative 49 Operation Crossroads.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Weapons Databook, Volume I 3 Stockpile
    3 Stockpile Chapter Three USNuclear Stockpile This section describes the 24 types of warheads cur- enriched uranium (oralloy) as its nuclear fissile material rently in the U.S. nuclear stockpile. As of 1983, the total and is considered volatile and unsafe. As a result, its number of warheads was an estimated 26,000. They are nuclear materials and fuzes are kept separately from the made in a wide variety of configurations with over 50 artillery projectile. The W33 can be used in two differ- different modifications and yields. The smallest war- ent yield configurations and requires the assembly and head is the man-portable nuclear land mine, known as insertion of distinct "pits" (nuclear materials cores) with the "Special Atomic Demolition Munition" (SADM). the amount of materials determining a "low" or '4high'' The SADM weighs only 58.5 pounds and has an explo- yield. sive yield (W54) equivalent to as little as 10 tons of TNT, In contrast, the newest of the nuclear warheads is the The largest yield is found in the 165 ton TITAN I1 mis- W80,5 a thermonuclear warhead built for the long-range sile, which carries a four ton nuclear warhead (W53) Air-Launched Cruise Missile (ALCM) and first deployed equal in explosive capability to 9 million tons of TNT, in late 1981. The W80 warhead has a yield equivalent to The nuclear weapons stockpile officially includes 200 kilotons of TNT (more than 20 times greater than the only those nuclear missile reentry vehicles, bombs, artil- W33), weighs about the same as the W33, utilizes the lery projectiles, and atomic demolition munitions that same material (oralloy), and, through improvements in are in "active service."l Active service means those electronics such as fuzing and miniaturization, repre- which are in the custody of the Department of Defense sents close to the limits of technology in building a high and considered "war reserve weapons." Excluded are yield, safe, small warhead.
    [Show full text]
  • PC Cake Pump
    PC Cake Pump 60 Hz 1339-00 en Installation, Operating and Maintenance Instructions 310190010011 US 03.2020 310190010011 www.sulzer.com 4 Installation, Operating and Maintenance Instructions (Original Instructions) PC Cake Pump PC Cake Pump Table of contents 1. Installation .............................................................................................................................................6 1.1 Installation and safety recommendations ............................................................................................... 6 1.1.1 General ..................................................................................................................................................6 1.1.2 System design & installation .................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Handling ..................................................................................................................................................6 1.3 Storage and infrequent operation ........................................................................................................... 7 1.3.1 Short term storage ..................................................................................................................................7 1.3.2 Long term storage ...................................................................................................................................7 1.4 Electrical .................................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Beds 2 Bars 98 Dressers, Night Stands, Chest 47 Bar Stools 99 Wardrobes 54 Accent Chairs 104 Cabinets, Bookshelves 64 Ottomans 107 Computer Desks 69 Recliners 115 Office Chairs 74 Sofa Sets 116 TV Stands 84 Futons 118 Coffee Tables 90 Kitchen 122 Dinettes 94 Accessories 131 WWW.HODEDAH.COM 1 Ivory Bronze Black • Metal Day Bed HIDB707 • H46.3” W78” D40.5” • Available in Black, Bronze & Ivory WWW.HODEDAH.COM 2 Bronze Black IvoryIvory • Metal Day Bed • H38” W78” D40.5” HIDB808 • Available in Black, Bronze & Ivory WWW.HODEDAH.COM 3 • Metal Day Bed HIDB909 • H37.4” W78” D40.5” • Available in Charcoal, Silver, Black & Ivory Ivory WWW.HODEDAH.COM 4 • Metal Bed Finished in Metallic Silver HI905 • Twin H45.3” W39.5” D78” Silver • Full H45.3” W54.5” D78” • Queen H45.3” W60.5” D83.2” WWW.HODEDAH.COM 5 • Metal Bed Finished in Metallic Charcoal HI910 • Twin H39.4” W39.5” D78” Charcoal • Full H39.4” W54.52” D78” • Queen 39.4” W60.5” D83.2” WWW.HODEDAH.COM 6 • Metal Bed Finished in White HI910 • Twin H39.4” W39.5” D78” White • Full H39.4” W54.52” D78” • Queen 39.4” W60.5” D83.2” WWW.HODEDAH.COM 7 • Metal Bed Finished in Metallic Bronze HI915 • Twin H43.3” W39.5” D78” Bronze • Full H43.3” W54.5” D78” • Queen H43.3” W60.5” D83.2” WWW.HODEDAH.COM 8 • Metal Bed Finished in Metallic Charcoal HI920 • Twin H43.3” W39.5” D78” Charcoal • Full H43.3” W54.5” D78” • Queen H43.3” W60.5” D83.2” WWW.HODEDAH.COM 9 • Metal Bed Finished in Metallic Charcoal HI925 • Twin H39.4” W39.8” D78.7” Charcoal • Full H39.4” W55” D78.7” • Queen H39.4” W60.9” D83.9”
    [Show full text]
  • NYISO Emergency Operations Manual
    N Y I S O E M E R G E N C Y O P E R A T I O N S M A N U A L Table A.5 List of Thunderstorm Multiple Contingencies Cases Table A.5 List of Thunderstorm Multiple Contingencies Cases 1. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, 311 2. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, 77 3. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, Y94, TA5, Bank (95891) 4. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, Y88 5. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, F31, W81 6. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, W82, Eastview Bank 2S, W65 7. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, W93, Eastview Bank 2N, W79 8. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, A2253 9. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, W75 10. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, 301 11. F38, Y86, F39, Y87, Wood St. Bank 2, Pleasantville Bank 1, 303 12. W89, W73, W90, W74, Y50, Pleasantville Bank 2, 311 13. W89, W73, W90, W74, Y50, Pleasantville Bank 2, 77 14. W89, W73, W90, W74, Y50, Pleasantville Bank 2, Y94, TA5 Bank (95891) 15. W89, W73, W90, W74, Y50, Pleasantville Bank 2, Y88 16. W89, W73, W90, W74, Y50, Pleasantville Bank 2, F31, W81 17. W89, W73, W90, W74, Y50, Pleasantville Bank 2, W82 Eastview Bank 2S, W65 18.
    [Show full text]