DOCSLIB.ORG

EU-CELAC Innovact Platform: Innovation to Promote Territorial

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EU-CELAC Innovact Platform: Innovation to Promote Territorial 30 September 2017 EU-CELAC Innovact Platform: Innovation to promote Territorial Cohesion Task 2 : Value chain mapping in the México - Guatemala cross-border region EU-CELAC Innovact Platform: Innovation to promote Territorial Cohesion Task 2: Value chain mapping in the México-Guatemala cross-border region 30 September 2017 For any information regarding this document please contact: Saskia Bonnefoi, Competitiveness [email protected] +52 1 55 4133 7086 Inés Sagrario, Task Leader for Task 2, Competitiveness [email protected] +34 626163032 Table of Contents 1 Summary in EN ................................................................................................................... 4 2 Resumen en ES .................................................................................................................... 5 3 The Context of the Border Area .......................................................................................... 6 3.1 Mexico – Guatemala ................................................................................................................................................. 6 4 National Level Priorities on each side of the Border........................................................... 7 4.1 Mexico ...................................................................................................................................................................... 7 4.2 Guatemala ................................................................................................................................................................. 9 5 Value Chain Mapping in the Border Area ......................................................................... 11 5.1 Value Chain A: Energy Industry ............................................................................................................................. 11 5.1.1 Key Industry Characteristics and Economic Indicators ...................................................................................... 11 5.1.2 Mapping of Key Players in the Value Chain ...................................................................................................... 13 5.1.3 Key Challenges and Barriers to Development .................................................................................................... 14 5.1.4 Opportunities for Cross-Border Collaboration ................................................................................................... 14 5.2 Value Chain B: Information Technology (focus on agriculture) ..................................................................... 15 5.2.1 Key Industry Characteristics and Economic Indicators ...................................................................................... 15 5.2.2 Mapping of Key Players in the Value Chain ...................................................................................................... 17 5.2.3 Key Challenges and Barriers to Development .................................................................................................... 18 5.2.4 Opportunities for Cross-Border Collaboration ................................................................................................... 18 6 Prioritization of Value Chains ........................................................................................... 19 7 Recommendations for Next Tasks ..................................................................................... 20 : Contact Details of Interviewees ......................................................................... 21 : Bibliography ...................................................................................................... 23 : European Commission programs relevant to INNOVACT in this region ......... 24 : Additional information on Industries and Value Chains ................................... 25 : Mexico – Guatemala Binational Commission ................................................... 28 Tables Table 1 Preliminary stakeholder mapping ......................................................................... Fehler! Textmarke nicht definiert. Figures Figure 1 Overview of team structure and organisation of work ........................................ Fehler! Textmarke nicht definiert. 3 1 Summary in EN Mexico and Guatemala share a long border (over 900 km) and is characterized by a strong economic and social interdependence. This border runs between the Guatemalan departments of San Marcos, Huehuetenango, El Quiché and El Petén; and the Mexican states of Campeche, Tabasco and Chiapas. Bilateral relations between both countries have been historically profound and diverse since 1848. They have particularly strengthened during the last decade. For instance, between 2013 and 2016, more than 40 bilateral agreements were signed. México and Guatemala have today different mechanisms of cooperation such as the Mexico-Guatemala Binational Commission that brings together government institutions from both countries, related to issues on the bilateral agenda (Technical and Scientific Cooperation, Economic and Political Affairs, Social Development, and Energy, among others). The Tuxtla Mechanism is another initiative, created in 1991, which aims to promote political dialogue, consolidate peace, democracy and foster regional cooperation among Central American countries. This mechanism also encourages joint economic projects and the creation of regional cooperation actions. Also, in 1998, Mexico and Guatemala signed a Basic Agreement on Technical and Scientific Cooperation, which includes the following topics: Exchanges of specialists, researchers and university professors; Joint or coordinated implementation of programs, research projects and technological development linking research and industry centers; Exchange of information on scientific and technological research; Organization of seminars, workshops and conferences. With respect to specific efforts related to economic development, in 2011, Mexico signed a Free Trade Agreement with Central America (Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras y Nicaragua), and one of its objectives is to strengthen the competitiveness of its companies and to encourage the dynamic participation of the different economic agents through impulse to innovation and creativity. Recently, in June 2017, during the visit of the Mexican president to Guatemala, bi-national efforts were updated, focusing on trade and investment through technical assistance in export promotion models, attraction of investments and exchange of business intelligence methodologies. Given the complexity of economic and social activities in both countries, and the binational strategy for regional integration, the focus of the national priorities in the following pages will consider a wide scope of the border area , including the group of Mexican states in the Southern region (mainly Campeche, Chiapas, Yucatan and Tabasco) and almost the entire country on the side of Guatemala. It is also important to note that both countries have a very active policy for value chain development, focusing on strategic sectors (both at national and regional level), particularly in high value added activities such as ICT and energy, in order to stimulate the diversification of their economies. Existing value chains in the area were analysed under various criteria through direct interviews with stakeholders, concluding that the rest of the project will be centered in Energy and ICTs . As both industries have a cross-sector impact, it is important to consider their links to the other value chains in the region, such as ICT and agriculture , or energy and environmental preservation and the indirect effect on tourism. 4 2 Resumen en ES México y Guatemala comparten una larga frontera (más de 900 km) y se caracterizan por una fuerte interdependencia económica y social. Esta frontera corre entre los departamentos guatemaltecos de San Marcos, Huehuetenango, El Quiché y El Petén; y los estados mexicanos de Campeche, Tabasco y Chiapas. Las relaciones bilaterales entre ambos países han sido históricamente profundas y diversas desde 1848 y se han fortalecido especialmente durante la última década. Por ejemplo, entre 2013 y 2016, se firmaron más de 40 acuerdos bilaterales. México y Guatemala tienen hoy diferentes mecanismos de cooperación como la Comisión Binacional México-Guatemala que reúne a instituciones gubernamentales de ambos países, relacionadas con temas de la agenda bilateral (Cooperación Técnica y Científica, Asuntos Económicos y Políticos, Desarrollo Social y Energía, entre otros). El Mecanismo de Tuxtla es otra iniciativa, creada en 1991, cuyo objetivo es promover el diálogo político, consolidar la paz, la democracia y fomentar la cooperación regional entre los países centroamericanos. Este mecanismo también fomenta proyectos económicos conjuntos y la creación de acciones de cooperación regional. Además, en 1998, México y Guatemala firmaron un Acuerdo Básico de Cooperación Técnica y Científica, que incluye los siguientes temas: Intercambio de especialistas, investigadores y profesores universitarios; Ejecución conjunta o coordinada de programas, proyectos de investigación y desarrollo tecnológico que vinculen centros de investigación y de industrias; Intercambio de información sobre investigación científica y tecnológica; Organización de seminarios, talleres y conferencias. Con respecto a los esfuerzos específicos relacionados con el desarrollo económico, en 2011 México firmó un Tratado
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pre-Columbian Agriculture in Mexico Carol J
    Pre-Columbian Agriculture in Mexico Carol J. Lange, SCSC 621, International Agricultural Research Centers- Mexico, Study Abroad, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University Introduction The term pre-Columbian refers to the cultures of the Americas in the time before significant European influence. While technically referring to the era before Christopher Columbus, in practice the term usually includes indigenous cultures as they continued to develop until they were conquered or significantly influenced by Europeans, even if this happened decades or even centuries after Columbus first landed in 1492. Pre-Columbian is used especially often in discussions of the great indigenous civilizations of the Americas, such as those of Mesoamerica. Pre-Columbian civilizations independently established during this era are characterized by hallmarks which included permanent or urban settlements, agriculture, civic and monumental architecture, and complex societal hierarchies. Many of these civilizations had long ceased to function by the time of the first permanent European arrivals (c. late fifteenth-early sixteenth centuries), and are known only through archaeological evidence. Others were contemporary with this period, and are also known from historical accounts of the time. A few, such as the Maya, had their own written records. However, most Europeans of the time largely viewed such text as heretical and few survived Christian pyres. Only a few hidden documents remain today, leaving us a mere glimpse of ancient culture and knowledge. Agricultural Development Early inhabitants of the Americas developed agriculture, breeding maize (corn) from ears 2-5 cm in length to perhaps 10-15 cm in length. Potatoes, tomatoes, pumpkins, and avocados were among other plants grown by natives.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico's Agriculture Development
    Mexico’s Agriculture Development: Perspective and Outlook UNCTAD Mexican agriculture remains most important but came under pressure… – Mexico has the largest population in rural areas in the OECD • 22 per cent of Mexican’s live in rural areas • 8 million farmers – Contribution to GDP fell from 8 per cent in early 1990s to 4 per cent – Employment in agriculture dropped from 25 per cent in early 1990s to 14 per cent Employment in agriculture in Mexico in million – Poverty in rural areas is high 9 8 • 61 per cent of 7 6 population in rural 5 areas below rural 4 poverty line 3 2 1 0 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Mexican agricultural sector is heterogeneous… – Coexistance of large commercial farms and Smaller farms often producing for subsistance – Average landholding small with 5 ha – Small and medium farms employ majority or rural population – Agricultural wages declined on average (while others generally increased) – Main production (highest value of 15 strategic products) Agrifood Livestock • Maize • Poultry meat • Sugar cane • Beef • Sorghum • Milk • Wheat Mexican Agriculture and Trade Policy are linked… – Mexico’s trade policy has led to much more open markets, especially within the NAFTA region – Tariffs on agricultural products between the US and Mexico have been eliminated – In terms of standards and other measures regulating cross border trade the markets are not fully integrated and do not have a common agricultural policy – High subsidies in the US on products such as maize,
    [Show full text]
  • Mexican Agricultural and Food Export Competitiveness
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Papers in Economics MEXICAN AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD EXPORT COMPETITIVENESS Jaime E. Málaga Gary W. Williams* TAMRC International Market Research Report No. IM-01-06 February 2006 * Jaime E. Malaga is Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409 and Gary W. Williams is Professor of Agricultural Economics and Director, Texas Agricultural Market Research, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2124. MEXICAN AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD EXPORT COMPETITIVENESS Texas Agribusiness Market Research Center (TAMRC) International Market Research Report No. IM-01-06, February 2006 by Dr. Jaime E. Málaga and Dr. Gary W. Williams. Abstract: This report analyzes the export performance of the Mexican agricultural and food sector in recent years with a particular emphasis on the changing competitiveness of those exports in the U.S. and world markets. The report includes an examination of the general trends in Mexican agricultural and food exports, an analysis of the international competitiveness of the major subgroups of Mexican agriculture based on the Revealed Comparative Advantage methodology, an assessment of the competitiveness of Mexican exports of specific agricultural and food products to the United States, a consideration of the effectiveness of Mexico’s agricultural and food export market diversification efforts, a discussion of the main factors likely to affect the long-term competitiveness of Mexican agriculture, and policy recommendations for enhancing the competitiveness of Mexican agricultural and food exports. Acknowledgements: The research reported here was conducted under contract with the World Bank (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, International Development Association), Latin America and the Caribbean Region Agriculture and Rural Development, 1818 H St., Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Maize in Mexico
    Maize in Mexico Diane Brown Des Moines, Iowa 2006 Borlaug~Ruan World Food Prize International Internship CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center El Batán, México 1 Abstract On June 17th, 2006, I left the familiar people and community of Des Moines, Iowa, on an adventure that would transform how I saw myself, my nation, and the world. I had the incredible opportunity as a Borlaug~Ruan International Intern to work at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) in Mexico for eight weeks. I worked with the Diversity Group in the biotechnology labs, observing and assisting with a variety of lab techniques including DNA extraction and quantification, polymerase chain reactions (PCR), and agarose gels. Outside the lab, I had the chance to visit field sites and to explore many fascinating historic and cultural sites. Visiting the fields and speaking with the Mexican farmers gave me a new insight into the food security issues faced by small farmers in Mexico and in developing communities throughout the world. My work gave me a new understanding of genetics, molecular biology, and laboratory techniques, but more importantly, the experience gave me a love for the people of Mexico and a desire to commit my life and career to improving livelihoods around the world. Acknowledgements I sincerely thank all of the wonderful people of CIMMYT for making my internship a phenomenal, life-changing experience. Your kindness, patience, and generosity touched me deeply. Special thanks goes to Marilyn Warburton, my supervisor, for all of her advice and guidance. She always made time to answer my questions, to look over my work, and to welcome me into her home.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities for Dutch Businesses in the Mexican Protected Horticulture Sector a Report by Transfer LBC
    Opportunities for Dutch Businesses in the Mexican Protected Horticulture Sector A report by Transfer LBC April 2020 Commissioned by the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Mexico City TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 5 METHODOLOGY 5 GLOSSARY OF TERMS 6 INTRODUCING MEXICO 8 Geography & History 8 People & Demography 8 Economy 9 TOP REASONS ON WHY MEXICAN HORTICULTURAL SECTOR IS INTERESTING FOR DUTCH COMPANIES 11 THE HORTICULTURE SECTOR IN MEXICO 13 History 13 The horticultural sector in general 14 Growth potential 14 Important regions 15 Private Investment, and Expenditure and Government support 16 Infrastructure & technologies 18 Employment 20 Exports 21 THE MOST IMPORTANT SUB SECTORS OF THE MEXICAN HORTICULTURE SECTOR 23 Vegetables 23 Tomato 24 Bell Pepper 26 Cucumber 27 Ornamental Plants and Flowers 28 Types of plants and flowers 28 State support for flower growers 29 1 Orchids 30 Berries 31 Tropical fruits 34 Avocado 34 Citrus 37 Mango 40 SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE ON MEXICAN HORTICULTURE 43 COMPETITION IN THE SECTOR 44 STAKEHOLDERS IN THE HORTICULTURE MARKET IN MEXIO 46 SUSTAINABILTY AND CIRCULARITY 49 Mexico’s current initiatives for its SDGs 49 The possible Dutch contribution to the Mexican Horticultural SDG needs 50 SWOT COMPARISON: THE MEXICAN HORTICULTURE SECTOR 52 Strengths 52 Weaknesses 53 Opportunities 54 Threats 56 THE FUTURE OF HORTICULTURE IN MEXICO 58 Flora Park Querétaro 58 Second phase of Agropark Querétaro 59 Production of Cannabis 60 UPCOMING HORTICULTURE TRADE FAIRS AND EVENTS IN MEXICO 61 CONCLUSION 62 RECOMMENDATIONS 62 For Dutch Companies 62 For Dutch Government Agencies 63 REFERENCES 64 List of organizations contacted for this study 64 Other sources 66 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report delves into the growing horticulture sector of Mexico and its possible challenges and opportunities for Dutch businesses interested in entering the promising market.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico's Agriculture Development
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENTM ENT MEXICO’S AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT: PPerspectiveserspectives andand OOutlookutlook U N I T E D N A T I O N S C O N F E R E N C E O N T R A D E A N D D E V E L O P M E N T MEXICO’S AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT: Perspectives and Outlook New York and Geneva 2014 ii MEXICO’S AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT: PERSPECTIVES AND OUTLOOK NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of authorities or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Symbols of the United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is requested, together with a copy of the publication containing the quotation or reprint to be sent to the UNCTAD secretariat at: Palais des Nations, CH 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. This publication has not been formally edited. UNCTAD/DITC/TNCD/2012/2/Rev.1 Copyright © United Nations, 2014 All rights reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Mexico’s Agricultural Development: Perspectives and Outlook was prepared by a team from the Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities, UNCTAD, led by Guillermo Valles, Director, and the Special Unit on Commodities, UNCTAD, led by Samuel Gayi, Head.
    [Show full text]
  • PB7 Agricultural Trade Liberalization and Mexico Patel and Henriques2003
    POLICY BRIEF NO. 7 Agricultural Trade Liberalization and Mexico by Gisele Henriques and Raj Patel August 2003 Raj Patel, Ph.D. Policy Analyst Institute for Food and Development Policy/Food First Oakland, CA Gisele Henriques Intern Institute for Food and Development Policy/Food First Oakland, CA Executive Summary Mexico’s experience of liberalization is a canary in the mineshaft for other agricultural economies in the Global South. Mexico’s political and economic ties to the United States mean that it is subject, perhaps more than any other country in the world, to the direct political-economic intervention of its powerful northern neighbor. The effects of such interventions have unequivocally hurt the poorest people in the country: those who work on the land in rural areas. Following open market policies, we have seen increases in raw measures of economic change in foreign direct investment, aggregate GDP per capita, and export volumes. For example, Mexico’s overall exports increased 7-fold between 1981, the year before liberalization, and 2001.1 Imports have matched this rise, with a 6.7-fold increase from 1981 to 2001.2 At an aggregate level, then, it would seem as if Mexico has profited from liberalization. Yet closer scrutiny of the figures show that the benefits have been divided very unequally. Some farmers have been able to take advantage of newly open markets in the U.S. Since the onset of NAFTA, exports of fruits and vegetables have increased 57 %.3Yet, given that tariff barriers in these products were already low, before NAFTA, it is more reasonable to attribute the shift to these crops as a response to “push factors”, foremost among which is the rapid fall in the domestic price of maize.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinampa Agricultural System of Mexico City Mexico
    CHINAMPA AGRICULTURAL SYSTEM OF MEXICO CITY MEXICO A PROPOSAL FOR DESIGNATION AS GLOBALLY IMPORTANT AGRICULTURAL HERITAGE SYSTEMS (GIAHS) GOVERNMENT OF MEXICO CITY AUTHORITY OF THE WORLD NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE ZONE IN XOCHIMILCO, TLÁHUAC AND MILPA ALTA MEXICO CITY JULY 7th, 2017 A"PROPOSAL"FOR"GIASH"DESIGNATION! 1! TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages Information Summary 4 Description of the Globally Important Agricultural 11 Heritage Systems I. Characteristics of the GIAHS proposed 11 1. Food security and livelihoods. 19 2. Biodiversity and ecosystem functions 27 27 3. Knowledge systems and adapted technologies 34 4. Cultures, systems of values and social organizations 48 (agri-culture) 5. Remarkable landscapes, land and water resources 56 management features. II. Historical significance. 62 III. Contemporary relevance. 65 IV. Threats and challenges. 68 V. Practical considerations. 69 1. Ongoing efforts to promote GIAHS 69 2. Potentialities and opportunities for sustainability and 70 management of GIAHS. 3. Expected impacts of GIAHS on society and ecology. 70 4. Motivation of the local communities, the national/local 70 authorities and other relevant stakeholders. 5. References 72 VI. Dynamic Conservation Plan 77 1. General Action Plan 81 2. Dynamic Plan of Specific Actions (2017-2022) 89 • Data Sheet for the Supply and Marketing Center in 94 Xochimilco (Muyuguarda) • Data Sheet for the Supply and Marketing Center in 97 Tláhuac (Tlaltenco) • Data Sheet for the Research and Production Center 100 of seeds and planting material of Xochimilco. • Data sheet for the Chinampa Agricultural Park of 103 Mexico City VI. Complementary data 107 1. Evolution of the Mexico City’s lacustrine zone and its 107 chinampa system 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Consumption of Chinese Outbound Tourists in Spain
    FOOD CONSUMPTION OF CHINESE OUTBOUND TOURISTS IN SPAIN Jiayi Lin Per citar o enllaçar aquest document: Para citar o enlazar este documento: Use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/10803/664897 ADVERTIMENT. L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials d'investigació i docència en els termes establerts a l'art. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix l'autorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes d'explotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs. ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis doctoral y su utilización debe respetar los derechos de la persona autora. Puede ser utilizada para consulta o estudio personal, así como en actividades o materiales de investigación y docencia en los términos establecidos en el art. 32 del Texto Refundido de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual (RDL 1/1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Foods Find Growing Niche in Mexico Mexico
    THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Voluntary - Public Date: 2/11/2011 GAIN Report Number: MX0322 Mexico Post: Mexico ATO Organic Foods Find Growing Niche in Mexico Report Categories: Organic Products Retail Food Sector Coffee Fresh Fruit Approved By: Erik W. Hansen Prepared By: Vanessa Salcido Report Highlights: Demand for organic food products in Mexico has been growing over the last few years along with the overall trend of healthier eating. Organic foods are perceived by many Mexican consumers to be healthier than conventional foods. Mexico is now considered the second more obese country in the world and the Mexican government has made it a priority to reverse this through education campaigns and new food nutrition laws targeting school children. As a result, a growing number of Mexican consumers are pursuing healthier lifestyles which include better eating habits. This makes Mexico an attractive market for U.S. exporters of organic food products. General Information: Section I: Mexican Organics Market Overview Mexico is a top 20 producer of organic foods worldwide with 1.3 million acres of land dedicated to organic agriculture. Mexico is the main producer and largest exporter of organic coffee and the third largest producer of organic honey. Other organic crops grown in Mexico include corn, cacao, avocados, sesame seeds, cactus paddles, vanilla beans, milk, and dairy products. Over the last decade, several efforts had been made by the Mexican government and private sector to promote organic farming. Dozens of outdoor markets (tianguis) and farmer’s markets for organic products have been set up in different regions of Mexico including Oaxaca, Veracruz, and Chiapas where more than 500 small producers gather to sell their products.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico Chemicals
    MEXICO CHEMICALS 2015 MEXICO CHEMICALS MEXICO CHEMICALS 2015 Economy - Chemicals - Energy Reforms - Petrochemicals - Agrochemicals Paints and Coatings - Specialty Chemicals - Distribution Dear Readers, Mexico’s chemicals industry presents an enormous opportunity. The country’s vast wealth of natural resources, which includes medicinal plants, oil, to minerals, timber, marine, and agricultural products, can serve as raw materials and create new openings for developing new businesses and integrating multiple supply chains. At the same time, top-down, government-led structural reforms have opened the economy to further investment and will spur domestic consumption and exports, particularly with its northern neighbor. Mexico’s demographic potential is also obvious. In 2015, 53 million of Mexico’s 120 million citizens will be active participants in the economy. According to the National Institute of Geography and Statistics (INEGI), the chemicals industry accounted for 2.6% of Mexico’s GDP and 14.5% of manufacturing GDP in 2012, while employment was 0.8% and 8%, respectively. The largest segments of the industry include petrochemicals, rubber and plastics, pharmaceuticals, soaps, detergents and cosmetics. For the time being, the chemicals industry is slowed by its dependence on imports for raw materials, but savvy and visionary leaders can seize this historical opportunity to increase local production. The petrochemicals sector will be the most closely watched, in light of the opening of the exploration and production segment of the hydrocarbons industry and the privatization of petrochemicals plants. Historically, petrochemicals production has been volatile, with the industry reaching an apex of 51 plants producing 16 million metric tons in 1996, but the subsequent lack of investment and upgrade caused these facilities to decay.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoliberalism Revisited NEOLIBERALISM REVISITED
    I V Neoliberalism Revisited NEOLIBERALISM REVISITED Economic Restructuring and Mexico's Political Future edited by GERARD 0 OTERO Simon Fraser University WestviewPress A Division of Portions of Chapters 1 and 12 by Gerardo Otero are from Gerardo Otero, "Mexico's Political Fu- Anthropology, 32(3):316-339 of Sociology and ' Canadian Review ture(s) in a Globalizing Economy, than Sociology and Anthropology Association. Reprinted with permission of the Cana Portions of Chapter 9 by Lynn Stephen are taken from Lynn Stephen, "Women in Mexico's Popu-Latin lar Movements: Survival Strategies Against Ecological and Economic impoverishment:' Perspectives, 19(l):73_96, copyright © 1992 by Sage Publications. Reprinted by permis- American sion of Sage Publications, Inc. All rights reserved, printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be re- form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photo- produced or transmitted in any copy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the publisher. Copyright © 1996 by Westview Press, Inc., A Division of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. Published in 1996 in the United States of America by WeStview Press, Inc., ssoo Central Avenue, Boulder, Colorado 80301-2877, and in the United Kingdom by WestvieW Press, 12 Hid's Copse Road, Cumnor Hill, Oxford 0X2 9JJ. A CIP catalog record of this book is available from the Library of Congress. Hardcover: ISBN 0813324408 paperback: ISBN 08I332441 6 S The paper used in this publication meets the requirements of the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for printed Library Materials Z39.48-1984.
    [Show full text]