Farm Labor and Mexico's Export Produce Industry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Farm Labor and Mexico's Export Produce Industry Farm Labor and Mexico’s Export Produce Industry Farm Labor and Mexico’s Export Produce Industry Agustin Escobar, Philip Martin, and Omar Stabridis October 2019 ISBN: 978-1-938027-90-1 This research report was made possible through generous grant funding support from the Walmart Foundation. Views expressed in this report are those of the authors and not the donors. Some of the pictures used in this book are from public sources and from project researchers working in Jalisco, Michoacán, Guanajuato, Baja California and Sinaloa. All other photos provided courtesy of shuttrstock.com PREFACE 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 KEY FINDINGS ............................................................................9 MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................10 INTRODUCTION 17 1 MEXICAN MIGRANT WORKERS: LOS ANGELES TIMES..........22 POLARIS: TRAFFICKED WORKERS ..........................................34 URBAN INSTITUTE: TRAFFICKED WORKERS ..........................39 THINKING ABOUT TRAFFICKING .............................................43 MEXICO: AGRICULTURE AND EXPORTS 49 2 FARM STRUCTURE AND SALES...............................................51 MEXICO’S FRUIT AND VEGETABLE EXPORTS ........................55 MEXICO’S FRUIT EXPORTS 63 3 AVOCADOS................................................................................66 BERRIES ...................................................................................69 MEXICO’S VEGETABLE EXPORTS 93 4 TOMATOES................................................................................96 BELL PEPPERS .......................................................................102 CUCUMBERS ..........................................................................103 MEXICO’S LABOR FORCE AND FARM WORKERS 107 5 LEVY’S ECONOMIC CRITIQUE ...............................................112 SINALOA FARM WORKERS ....................................................115 6 MEXICO’S FARM WORKFORCE 119 WORKER SURVEY: 2019 125 7 MIGRATION AND DEMOGRAPHICS.......................................129 WAGES ...................................................................................133 INCOME AND POVERTY ........................................................135 WORK-RELATED BENEFITS ...................................................137 RECRUITMENT AND ETHNICITY ............................................144 HOUSING ................................................................................145 CASE STUDIES AND FOCUS GROUPS: 2019 149 8 SOUTHERN JALISCO .............................................................151 LOCAL WORKERS ..................................................................152 MALE MIGRANT WORKERS ..................................................152 FEMALE MIGRANT WORKERS ..............................................157 OLDER WORKERS AND CHILDREN ......................................165 JOB COMPARISONS...............................................................165 WORKER-IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS ........................................167 CASE STUDY CONCLUSIONS ................................................172 9 CONCLUSIONS 177 BIBLIOGRAPHY 182 APPENDIX: WORKER PROFILES 191 ALEJANDRO............................................................................191 MARIO ....................................................................................198 FELICITAS ...............................................................................203 BEATRIZ ..................................................................................207 EDITH.......................................................................................213 SANDY ....................................................................................214 ERNESTINA ............................................................................215 ESMERALDA ...........................................................................217 GOVERNMENT AGENCIES .....................................................219 IV PREFACE he United States imports fresh fruits and vegetables Tfrom Mexico, where reports of poor conditions and abuse of workers on farms that produce tomatoes and ber- ries for US consumers have raised concerns. These reports are bottom up in the sense that they describe the wages and working conditions of particular workers without providing a top-down picture of average conditions for workers employed on export-oriented farms. This study develops a statistically valid picture of the average conditions of workers employed on export-oriented farms. Agustin Escobar, Philip Martin, and their colleagues reached three important conclusions. First, Mexico has a competitive advantage in producing some fruits and vegetables because of its favorable growing climate, lower labor costs, and widespread use of pro- tected culture or plastic-covered hoop structures that raise yields and reduce pest and weed issues. Second, Mexico’s export agri- culture is dominated by large farms that often include US partners who provide production and marketing assistance and increase grower sensitivity to worker wages and working conditions. 1 Third, the expansion of export-oriented agriculture is reducing rural poverty in Mexico. Almost all farm workers in export-oriented agri- culture earn more than the Mexican minimum wage, and many earn two or three times the minimum wage during the harvest season. More than 90 percent of workers on export-oriented farms report that their employers have enrolled them in Mexico’s comprehen- sive social security system, IMSS (Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social), which provides health care and other benefits to covered employees. However, some workers report that they do not receive services from these payroll-tax supported government agencies. Export-oriented agriculture is expanding in northern and central Mex- ico, drawing workers from poorer mountainous areas and southern Mexican states to richer areas, a migration pattern that may speed upward mobility for farm workers and their children. The combination of Mexico’s competitive advantage (which fuels agricultural expansion), frequent international partnerships that are sensitive to labor conditions, and higher wages and more opportu- nities for some of Mexico’s poorest residents leads to the con- clusion that export-oriented agriculture is a success story. In our opinion, supporting and improving wages and working conditions in export-oriented agriculture requires dealing with three major labor issues: migrants, benefit programs, and a future strategy. First, export-oriented agriculture is expanding in relatively richer areas of Mexico that have few additional local workers, increasing migrancy and the use of contractors to recruit workers. Although Mexico certainly needs to better regulate labor contractors to re- duce the potential for worker abuse during recruitment, the greater need is a strategy for farm worker migration. Should family or solo migrancy be encouraged? Moving families to areas with more op- portunity means that migrants and their children may benefit from higher wages, better schools, and upward mobility, but migrants 2 FARM LABOR AND MEXICO’S EXPORT PRODUCE INDUSTRY who settle in host areas may face backlashes. Leaving migrant families in poorer areas while solo adults send home remittances, by contrast, leads to better housing and more spending on chil- dren’s schooling and health care, but may not transform poorer areas into richer areas. Second, the current model in which almost all farmers pay social security taxes but some of their employees do not receive benefits is unsustainable. There are three options to maintain formal jobs on export-oriented farms: government agencies provide benefits to workers, offer employers credits against payroll taxes for health care, child care, housing, and other employer-provided services, or some combination of both. Of course, credits for privately provided services raise issues of who ensures that farmers are actually pro- viding services and that these services satisfy quality standards. Third, Mexico needs a future-oriented strategy for export-oriented agriculture. Labor costs are rising in both Mexico and the United States, as farmers on both sides of the border compete for the same workers to fill seasonal jobs. Most US farmers are responding by investing in housing to employ H-2A guest workers from Mexico and speeding up the development of labor-saving mechanization, while others are investing abroad in places with the labor, climate, and infrastructure to produce fruits and vegetables for Americans. The ways in which fresh fruits and vegetables are produced may change in the next decade in response to rising labor costs in both Mexico and the United States. Uncertainties about trade policy, technological developments, and guest worker policies raise ques- tions about the optimal level of private and public investment in housing, health care, and other facilities for migrant and seasonal farm workers whose numbers may shrink quickly in the future. For example, if strawberry harvesting machines prove viable, will they spread quickly in the United States and Mexico, displacing most of 3 the 75,000 workers employed in the two countries to harvest the most labor-intensive commodity in North America? Mexico’s export-oriented agricultural sector provides good jobs for low-skilled rural Mexicans, but the industry is at a crossroads. Stakeholders require better data, effective protective labor laws and their enforcement, and an employer-worker-government
Recommended publications
  • The Status of Rallus Elegans Tenuirostris in Mexico
    Jan., 1959 49 THE STATUS OF RALLUS ELEGANS TENUIROSTRIS IN MEXICO By DWAIN W. WARNER and ROBERT W. DICKERMAN Except for brief mention of occurrence in the states of Mbico and Tlaxcala and the Federal District and of measurements of a small series of specimens collected a half century or more ago, no additional information has been published on Rallus eleganstenuhstris. This subspecieswas described by Ridgway (1874) as Rallus elegans var. tenuirostris from “City of Mexico.” Oberholser ( 193 7) in his revision of the Clap- per Rails (R. Zongirostris) discusseda series of rails taken by E. W. Nelson and E. A. Goldman in July, 1904, near the headwaters of the Rio Lerma, referring to them as Rallus longirostris tenuirostris. Other, more recent major works have referred to the race of large rails inhabiting the fresh water marshes of the plateau of Mbico, two citing elegans and two citing longirostris as the speciesto which this population belongs. In conjunction with other studies in the marshes of central Mkxico, Dickerman col- lected fifteen specimens of this form between July, 1956, and May, 1958. These, plus two recently taken specimens from San Luis Potosi, extend greatly the known range of tenuirostris and add to the knowledge of its biology. All available material of tenuirostris was obtained on loan, as well as sufficient material of R. Zongirostris,including all speci- mens available from the east coast of MCxico, to give us a better picture of the large Rallus complex in MCxico. Sixteen specimens from various populations of both “species” in the United States were also at hand for comparisons.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentación De Powerpoint
    (Actualización al 19 de abril de 2021) Aguascalientes, Baja California, Baja Californi a S ur , Chihuahua, Coahuila, ¿Qué entidades Colima, Chiapas, Campeche, Estado de México, Durango, Guanajuato, Guerrero, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Michoacán, Morelos, Nayarit, OCALES federativas concluyeron L 30 la adecuación legislativa? Oaxaca, Puebla, Querétaro, Quintana Roo, San Luis Potosí, Sinaloa, Sonora, Tabasco, Tamaulipas, Veracruz . Tlaxcala, , Yucatán y Zacatecas ISTEMAS Aguascalientes, Baja California, Baja California Sur, Campeche, S VANCES EN LA A Chiapas, Chihuahua, CDMX, Coahuila, Colima, Durango, IMPLEMENTACIÓN ¿Qué entidades federativas Guanajuato, Guerrero, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Estado de México, Michoacán, ELOS ya cuentan con Comité D 32 Morelos, Nayarit, Nuevo León, Oaxaca, Puebla, Querétaro, Coordinador? Quintana Roo, San Luis Potosí, Sinaloa, Sonora, Tabasco, Tamaulipas, Tlaxcala, Veracruz, Yucatán y Zacatecas. INSTANCIA DEL SISTEMA # ENTIDADES FEDERATIVAS Entidades con Comisión de Aguascalientes, Baja California, Baja California Sur, Campeche, Chiapas, Chihuahua, CDMX, Coahuila, Colima, Durango, Guanajuato, Guerrero, Selección: Hidalgo, Jalisco, Estado de México, Michoacán, Morelos, Nayarit, Nuevo León, 32 Oaxaca, Puebla, Querétaro, Quintana Roo, San Luis Potosí, Sinaloa, Sonora, Tabasco, Tamaulipas, Tlaxcala, Veracruz, Yucatán y Zacatecas. Se considera que 31 entidades han cumplido con la conformación ya que el estado de Tlaxcala no considera la figura de este órgano Entidades que cuentan con Aguascalientes, Baja California, Baja California
    [Show full text]
  • PPS Mapa De México
    Desarrollo de PPS en gobiernos estatales Aguascalientes Reformas al Marco Jurídico Baja California Sur Campeche Chiapas Coahuila Estados con Reformas al Marco Jurídico Distrito Federal Durango Estados sin Reformas Estado de México al Marco Jurídico Guanajuato Jalisco Michoacán Morelos Nayarit Nuevo León Oaxaca Puebla Sonora Tabasco Tamaulipas Veracruz Yucatán Zacatecas Cámara Mexicana de la Industria de la Construcción Desarrollo de PPS en gobiernos estatales Aguascalientes Reformas al Marco Jurídico Baja California Sur Campeche Aguascalientes Chiapas Coahuila Reforma Constitucional: Sí Distrito Federal Tipo: Reforma PPS. Durango Estado de México Sectores: Educación. Guanajuato Jalisco Observaciones: Adicionalmente, hubo reformas a la Ley de Michoacán Presupuesto, a la Ley de Deuda y a Morelos la Ley de Obras Públicas. Nayarit Nuevo León Oaxaca Puebla Sonora Tabasco Tamaulipas Veracruz Yucatán Zacatecas Cámara Mexicana de la Industria de la Construcción Desarrollo de PPS en gobiernos estatales Aguascalientes Reformas al Marco Jurídico Baja California Sur Campeche Chiapas Coahuila Distrito Federal Durango Estado de México Guanajuato Jalisco Michoacán Morelos Nayarit Baja California Sur Nuevo León Reforma Constitucional: Sí Oaxaca Puebla Tipo: Reforma Parcial. Sonora Sectores: Pendiente. Tabasco Tamaulipas Observaciones: Veracruz Adicionalmente hubo Yucatán reformas a la Ley de Adquisiciones y a la Ley Zacatecas de Presupuesto. Cámara Mexicana de la Industria de la Construcción Desarrollo de PPS en gobiernos estatales Aguascalientes Reformas
    [Show full text]
  • Trumping the NAFTA Renegotiation an Alternative Policy Framework for Mexican-United States Cooperation and Economic Convergence
    S UBREGIONAL H EADQUARTERS IN M EXICO Trumping the NAFTA renegotiation An alternative policy framework for Mexican-United States cooperation and economic convergence Robert A. Blecker Juan Carlos Moreno-Brid Isabel Salat Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) • Subregional Headquarters in Mexico This document has been prepared by Robert A. Blecker (Department of Economics, American University), Juan Carlos Moreno-Brid (Facultad de Economía, UNAM) and Isabel Salat (Facultad de Economía, UNAM), under the supervision of Hugo Eduardo Beteta, Director, Subregional Headquarters in Mexico, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). The authors grateful acknowledge comments by Alex Izurieta and Ricardo Zapata. A version of this document is being published simultaneously in Real World Economics Review, December 2017. The views expressed in this document, which has been reproduced without formal editing, are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Organization. The term “dollars” refers to the currency of the United States of America. Key words NAFTA, regional integration, convergence, inequality, development, minimum wages LC/MEX/TS.2017/29 Distribution: Limited Copyright © United Nations, November 2017. All rights reserved. Printed at United Nations, Mexico City 2017-061 Applications for authorization to reproduce this work in whole or in part should be sent to the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), Publications and Web Services Division, [email protected]. Member States and their governmental institutions may reproduce this work without prior authorization, but are requested to mention the source and to inform ECLAC of such reproduction. 3 CONTENTS Abstract .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Relationship Between Militarization in the United States
    Exploring the Relationship Between Militarization in the United States and Crime Syndicates in Mexico: A Look at the Legislative Impact on the Pace of Cartel Militarization by Tracy Lynn Maish A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Criminology and Criminal Justice) in the University of Michigan-Dearborn 2021 Master Thesis Committee: Assistant Professor Maya P. Barak, Chair Associate Professor Kevin E. Early Associate Professor Donald E. Shelton Tracy Maish [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8834-4323 © Tracy L. Maish 2021 Acknowledgments The author would like to acknowledge the assistance of their committee and the impact that their guidance had on the process. Without the valuable feedback and enormous patience, this project would not the where it is today. Thank you to Dr. Maya Barak, Dr. Kevin Early, and Dr. Donald Shelton. Your academic mentorship will not be forgotten. ii Table of Contents 1. Acknowledgments ii 2. List of Tables iv 3. List of Figures v 4. Abstract vi 5. Chapter 1 Introduction 1 6. Chapter 2 The Militarization of Law Enforcement Within the United States 8 7. Chapter 3 Cartel Militarization 54 8. Chapter 4 The Look into a Mindset 73 9. Chapter 5 Research Findings 93 10. Chapter 6 Conclusion 108 11. References 112 iii List of Tables Table 1 .......................................................................................................................................... 80 Table 2 .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Farm and Its Functions
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 097 222 88 ME 018 230 TITLE The Far --Its Function and Future. Environmental Ecological Education Project. Revised. INSTITUTION Parkway School District, Chesterfield, Mo. SPONS AGENCY Bureau of Elementary and Secondary Education (DHEN/OE), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Jun 72 NOTE 156p. !DRS PRICE MF-$0.75 RC-$7.80 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS *Agricultural Education; Agriculture; Conservation Education; *Curriculum Guides; Ecology; *Environmental Education; Farmers; *Farm Visits; Instructional Materials; Learning Activities; *Primary Education; Teaching Guides; Units of Study (Subject Fields) IDENTIFIERS Elementary Secondary Education Act Title III; !SEA Title III ABSTRACT This unit, designed for use in the primary grades (K-3), focuses on the farm and its functions. The various aspects of farming are discussed from an ecological and environmental point of view through such topics as soil, plants, animals, machinery, production of food, job opportunities, and the future of the farm. There is also a comparison of the farm and the city and the value systems operating in each of the two environments. The unit includes the behavioral objectives and the expected student criteria for evaluation, pretests and posttests for each targeted grade level, suggested methodologies and sequence for teaching each concept, relevant background information, suggested field trips, patterns for student worksheets, a list of appropriate films, and a bibliograrAy for additional teacher resources. (MLB) .e U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION I WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION !... N' PTA lit IN kf PRO BEST !COPY AVAILABLE n.1 0 ITT., V A' ktTE.VIn F koy T Af PI IT SON (.4 I)I.TT TANI/A IION Ok o(TIN ATi'p.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Columbian Agriculture in Mexico Carol J
    Pre-Columbian Agriculture in Mexico Carol J. Lange, SCSC 621, International Agricultural Research Centers- Mexico, Study Abroad, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University Introduction The term pre-Columbian refers to the cultures of the Americas in the time before significant European influence. While technically referring to the era before Christopher Columbus, in practice the term usually includes indigenous cultures as they continued to develop until they were conquered or significantly influenced by Europeans, even if this happened decades or even centuries after Columbus first landed in 1492. Pre-Columbian is used especially often in discussions of the great indigenous civilizations of the Americas, such as those of Mesoamerica. Pre-Columbian civilizations independently established during this era are characterized by hallmarks which included permanent or urban settlements, agriculture, civic and monumental architecture, and complex societal hierarchies. Many of these civilizations had long ceased to function by the time of the first permanent European arrivals (c. late fifteenth-early sixteenth centuries), and are known only through archaeological evidence. Others were contemporary with this period, and are also known from historical accounts of the time. A few, such as the Maya, had their own written records. However, most Europeans of the time largely viewed such text as heretical and few survived Christian pyres. Only a few hidden documents remain today, leaving us a mere glimpse of ancient culture and knowledge. Agricultural Development Early inhabitants of the Americas developed agriculture, breeding maize (corn) from ears 2-5 cm in length to perhaps 10-15 cm in length. Potatoes, tomatoes, pumpkins, and avocados were among other plants grown by natives.
    [Show full text]
  • EU-CELAC Innovact Platform: Innovation to Promote Territorial
    30 September 2017 EU-CELAC Innovact Platform: Innovation to promote Territorial Cohesion Task 2 : Value chain mapping in the México - Guatemala cross-border region EU-CELAC Innovact Platform: Innovation to promote Territorial Cohesion Task 2: Value chain mapping in the México-Guatemala cross-border region 30 September 2017 For any information regarding this document please contact: Saskia Bonnefoi, Competitiveness [email protected] +52 1 55 4133 7086 Inés Sagrario, Task Leader for Task 2, Competitiveness [email protected] +34 626163032 Table of Contents 1 Summary in EN ................................................................................................................... 4 2 Resumen en ES .................................................................................................................... 5 3 The Context of the Border Area .......................................................................................... 6 3.1 Mexico – Guatemala ................................................................................................................................................. 6 4 National Level Priorities on each side of the Border........................................................... 7 4.1 Mexico ...................................................................................................................................................................... 7 4.2 Guatemala ................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health in Mexico Program Handbook 2019
    Universidad Panamericana PUBLIC HEALTH IN MEXICO PROGRAM HANDBOOK 2019 Public Health in Mexico, Summer 2019 Program Handbook PROGRAM INFORMATION........................................................................................................... 3 PROGRAM TEAM ............................................................................................................................... 3 TENTATIVE PROGRAM SCHEDULE & ACTIVITIES ............................................................................... 3 UNIVERSIDAD PANAMERICANA CAMPUS………………………………………………………………….3 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS ................................................................................................................... 4 PUBLIC HEALTH IN MEXICO .............................................................................................................. 4 HEALTHCARE SYSTEM AND POLICY IN MEXICO .................................................................................. 4 SPANISH LANGUAGE ......................................................................................................................... 4 HISTORY AND CULTURE OF MEXICO .................................................................................................. 4 TRANSCRIPT & CREDIT TRANSFER .................................................................................................... 4 FRIDAY EXCURSIONS & STUDY TRIPS ............................................................................................... 5 ACCOMMODATIONS & MEALS ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Farm Security Administation Photographs in Indiana
    FARM SECURITY ADMINISTRATION PHOTOGRAPHS IN INDIANA A STUDY GUIDE Roy Stryker Told the FSA Photographers “Show the city people what it is like to live on the farm.” TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 The FSA - OWI Photographic Collection at the Library of Congress 1 Great Depression and Farms 1 Roosevelt and Rural America 2 Creation of the Resettlement Administration 3 Creation of the Farm Security Administration 3 Organization of the FSA 5 Historical Section of the FSA 5 Criticisms of the FSA 8 The Indiana FSA Photographers 10 The Indiana FSA Photographs 13 City and Town 14 Erosion of the Land 16 River Floods 16 Tenant Farmers 18 Wartime Stories 19 New Deal Communities 19 Photographing Indiana Communities 22 Decatur Homesteads 23 Wabash Farms 23 Deshee Farms 24 Ideal of Agrarian Life 26 Faces and Character 27 Women, Work and the Hearth 28 Houses and Farm Buildings 29 Leisure and Relaxation Activities 30 Afro-Americans 30 The Changing Face of Rural America 31 Introduction This study guide is meant to provide an overall history of the Farm Security Administration and its photographic project in Indiana. It also provides background information, which can be used by students as they carry out the curriculum activities. Along with the curriculum resources, the study guide provides a basis for studying the history of the photos taken in Indiana by the FSA photographers. The FSA - OWI Photographic Collection at the Library of Congress The photographs of the Farm Security Administration (FSA) - Office of War Information (OWI) Photograph Collection at the Library of Congress form a large-scale photographic record of American life between 1935 and 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File— (Name of State) [Machine-Readable Data Files]/Prepared by the U.S
    2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File Issued January 2011 2010 Census of Population and Housing PL/10-2 (RV) Technical Documentation U.S. Department of Commerce U S C E N S U S B U R E A U Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU Helping You Make Informed Decisions For additional information concerning the Census Redistricting Data Program, contact the Census Redistricting Data Office, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC 20233, or phone 301-763-4039. For additional information concerning the DVD and software issues, contact the Administrative and Customer Services Division, Electronic Products Development Branch, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC 20233, or phone 301-763-7710. For additional information concerning the files, contact the Customer Liaison and Marketing Services Office, Customer Services Center, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC 20233, or phone 301-763-INFO (4636). For additional information concerning the technical documentation, contact the Administrative and Customer Services Division, Electronic Products Development Branch, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC 20233, or phone 301-763-8004. 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File Issued January 2011 2010 Census of Population and Housing PL/10-2 (RV) Technical Documentation U.S. Department of Commerce Gary Locke, Secretary Rebecca M. Blank, Acting Deputy Secretary Economics and Statistics Administration Rebecca M. Blank, Under Secretary for Economic Affairs U.S. CENSUS BUREAU Robert M. Groves, Director SUGGESTED CITATION FILES: 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File— (name of state) [machine-readable data files]/prepared by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rare Split of Amuzgo Verbal Inflection Enrique L
    Agreeing with subjects in number: The rare split of Amuzgo verbal inflection Enrique L. Palancar, Timothy Feist To cite this version: Enrique L. Palancar, Timothy Feist. Agreeing with subjects in number: The rare split of Amuzgo verbal inflection. Linguistic Typology, De Gruyter, 2015, 93 (3), 10.1515/lingty-2015-0011. hal- 01247113 HAL Id: hal-01247113 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01247113 Submitted on 21 Dec 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Agreeing with subjects in number: The rare split of Amuzgo verbal inflection Enrique L. Palancar, Structure et Dynamique des Langues (UMR8292), CNRS Timothy Feist, Surrey Morphology Group, University of Surrey To appear in Linguistic Typology 19:3, 2015 “[T]he formal expression of these categories involves a great deal of suppletion and morphologically conditioned internal modification and fusion, resulting in an extreme degree of irregularity. Indeed, Amuzgo morphology is so irregular that we have been tempted to call it a lexical language; that is, a language where the ideal seems to be for each form to have an idiosyncratic individuality rather than for it to be productively generatable [sic.].” (Smith-Stark and Tapia, 1986) Abstract Verbs in San Pedro Amuzgo, an Oto-Manguean language of Mexico, often have two different stems in the paradigm, one used with singular subjects and the other with plural subjects.
    [Show full text]