Envisioning a Traffic Solution for Copenhagen

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Envisioning a Traffic Solution for Copenhagen Envisioning a Traffic Solution for Copenhagen By: Amager Visioning Which consists of: Jared Breton, Tanner Buxton, Lucia Shumaker Envisioning a Traffic Solution for Copenhagen An Interactive Qualifying Project submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science In Cooperation With Miljøpunkt Amager By: Jared Breton Tanner Buxton Lucia Shumaker Date: 3 May 2014 Report Submitted to: Professor Robert Kinicki Professor Steve Taylor [email protected] ABSTRACT Though Copenhagen is trying to set the standards for a green city, thousands of cars clog its main traffic arteries during rush hour on a bi-daily basis. This project provided and evaluated (for Miljøpunkt Amager) a collection of plausible scenarios that focus on reducing motor vehicle congestion in Central Copenhagen, while preserving existing green space. The team conducted interviews, calculated cost and flood capacity, and analyzed traffic models to establish a compelling argument for alternatives to the Eastern Ring Road (E-R) and Ladegårdsåen tunnel proposals. Additionally, the report provides an in-depth discussion of seven tunnel scenarios along with recommendations for a modified combination of the two tunnel routes implemented in conjunction with a congestion charge zone. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ i Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ ii Table of Figures ........................................................................................................................... viii Table of Tables ............................................................................................................................. xii 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Background .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.2. The History of Urban Planning in Copenhagen ............................................................... 4 2.2.1. How the Industrial Revolution Changed Urban Planning ........................................ 5 2.2.2. The Five Finger Plan for Transit Oriented Development ......................................... 5 2.3. Current Development Plans in Copenhagen .................................................................... 7 2.3.1. The Ørestad Plan ....................................................................................................... 7 2.3.2. The Ladegårdsåen Traffic Tunnel and Storm Water Management Project .............. 9 2.3.3. Introduction to the Harbour Tunnel Traffic Management Solution ........................ 12 2.3.4. The Evolution of the Harbour Tunnel – The Eastern Ring Road ........................... 13 2.4. The Primary Problem Miljøpunkt Amager Plans to Address ........................................ 15 2.4.1. Copenhagen’s Increasing Traffic Congestion Problem .......................................... 15 2.5. The Secondary Problems a Tunnel will Address ........................................................... 18 2.5.1. Flooding due to Storm Water .................................................................................. 18 2.5.2. The Presence of Air and Noise Pollution in the City .............................................. 20 2.5.3. The Lack of Green Space ........................................................................................ 22 2.6. Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 23 3.0 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 25 3.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 25 3.2. Phase 1 - Situating the Project........................................................................................ 28 3.3. Phase 2 - Gathering Information on Traffic and Flooding ............................................. 29 ii 3.4. Phase 3 – Gathering Information on Public Opinion ..................................................... 30 3.4.1. Public Opinion Survey ............................................................................................ 31 3.5. Phase 4 - Developing a Vision of a New Tunnel ........................................................... 31 3.5.1. Weekly Meetings with Anders Jørn Jensen ............................................................ 31 3.5.2. Processed Information Regarding Existing Tunnel Projects .................................. 32 3.5.3. Processed Information on Copenhagen’s Present and Future Building Zones ....... 32 3.5.4. Conducted Additional Research on the Implementation of a Congestion Ring ..... 32 3.5.5. Identified Plausible Tunnel Routes ......................................................................... 33 3.6. Phase 5 – Evaluating and Comparing Tunnel Scenarios................................................ 33 3.6.1. The Process for Evaluating Tunnel Scenarios ........................................................ 33 3.6.2. Assigning Weights using a Pairwise Comparison Chart ........................................ 34 3.6.3. How the Expert Opinions Influence the Decision Matrix ...................................... 35 3.6.4. Estimating the Cost of a Tunnel Scenario............................................................... 37 3.6.5. Projecting a Tunnel’s Accessibility ........................................................................ 40 3.6.6. Estimating a Tunnel’s Floodwater Management Capabilities ................................ 41 3.6.7. Estimating the Number of Cars Reduced from Surface Roads ............................... 42 3.6.8. Calculating the Amount of Preserved Green Space ................................................ 43 3.6.9. Evaluating the Tunnel Scenarios using a Decision Matrix ..................................... 45 3.6.10. Amager Visioning’s Decision Matrix ..................................................................... 45 3.7. Phase 6 – Deliverables ................................................................................................... 46 3.8. Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 46 4.0 Data & Analysis ................................................................................................................. 47 4.1. Interviews ....................................................................................................................... 47 4.1.1. Julie Schack – Resident near Metro Construction .................................................. 47 4.1.2. Nis Fink – HOFOR Water Management Representative ........................................ 48 4.1.3. Susanne Rasmussen – Secretary of Amager West Local Committee ..................... 50 4.1.4. Lars Weiss – Leader of Social Democrats in Copenhagen City Hall ..................... 51 4.2. Scenario Compilation Overview .................................................................................... 53 iii 4.3. Scenario 1 – Eastern Ring Road ..................................................................................... 54 4.3.1. Eastern Ring Road Tunnel Overview ..................................................................... 55 4.3.2. Reasoning behind the Eastern Ring Road Route .................................................... 55 4.3.3. Thought behind the Traffic Flow ............................................................................ 56 4.3.4. Exit and Entrance Locations ................................................................................... 58 4.3.5. Pros and Cons of the Eastern Ring Road ................................................................ 68 4.4. Scenario 2 – Eastern Ring Road by Field’s Shopping Center........................................ 70 4.4.1. Eastern Ring Road by Field’s Overview ................................................................ 71 4.4.2. Reasoning behind Eastern Ring Road by Field’s Route ......................................... 71 4.4.3. Thought behind the Traffic Flow ............................................................................ 74 4.4.4. Exit and Entrance Locations ................................................................................... 74 4.4.5. Pros and Cons of Eastern Ring Road by Field’s ..................................................... 74 4.5. Scenario 3 – Ladegårdsåen Extended Tunnel ................................................................ 76 4.5.1. Ladegårdsåen Extended Tunnel Overview ............................................................. 77 4.5.2. Reasoning behind Ladegårdsåen Extended Tunnel Route ...................................... 77 4.5.3. Thought behind the Traffic Flow ............................................................................ 77 4.5.4. Entrance and Exit Locations ..................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Trains & Stations Ørestad South Cruise Ships North Zealand
    Rebslagervej Fafnersgade Universitets- Jens Munks Gade Ugle Mjølnerpark parken 197 5C Skriver- Kriegers Færgehavn Nord Gråspurvevej Gørtler- gangen E 47 P Carl Johans Gade A. L. Drew A. F. E 47 Dessaus Boulevard Frederiksborgvej vej Valhals- Stærevej Brofogedv Victor Vej DFDS Terminalen 41 gade Direction Helsingør Direction Helsingør Østmolen Østerbrogade Evanstonevej Blytækkervej Fenrisgade Borges Østbanegade J. E. Ohlsens Gade sens Vej Titangade Parken Sneppevej Drejervej Super- Hermodsgade Zoological Brumleby Plads 196 kilen Heimdalsgade 49 Peters- Rosenvængets Hovedvej Museum borgvej Rosen- vængets 27 Hothers Allé Næstvedgade Scherfigsvej Øster Allé Svanemøllest Nattergalevej Plads Rådmandsgade Musvågevej Over- Baldersgade skæringen 48 Langeliniekaj Jagtvej Rosen- Præstøgade 195 Strandøre Balders Olufsvej vængets Fiskedamsgade Lærkevej Sideallé 5C r Rørsangervej Fælledparken Faksegade anden Tranevej Plads Fakse Stærevej Borgmestervangen Hamletsgade Fogedgården Østerbro Ørnevej Lyngsies Nordre FrihavnsgadeTværg. Steen Amerika Fogedmarken skate park and Livjægergade Billes Pakhuskaj Kildevænget Mågevej Midgårdsgade Nannasgade Plads Ægirsgade Gade Plads playgrounds ENIGMA et Aggersborggade Soldal Trains & Stations Slejpnersg. Saabyesv. 194 Solvæng Cruise Ships Vølundsgade Edda- Odensegade Strandpromenaden en Nørrebro gården Fælledparken Langelinie Vestergårdsvej Rosenvængets Allé Kalkbrænderihavnsgade Nørrebro- Sorø- gade Ole Østerled Station Vesterled Nørre Allé Svaneknoppen 27 Hylte- Jørgensens hallen Holsteinsgade bro Gade Lipkesgade
    [Show full text]
  • Hæfte Amagerbrotorv 20160412.Indd
    AMAGERBRO TORV IDEOPLÆG April 2016 INDHOLD 01 INDLEDNING FORORD SIDE 4 BAGGRUND FOR OPGAVEN SIDE 4 BORGERINDDRAGELSE SIDE 5 FORUDSÆTNINGER SIDE 6 VISION SIDE 6 MÅL OG TEMAER SIDE 7 FRA VISION TIL PLAN SIDE 9 02 HOVEDIDÉ SIDE 14 KONCEPT SIDE 14 IDÉSKITSE 1 & 2 SIDE 16 03 DET VIDERE FORLØB SIDE 23 2 Idéoplæg Amagerbro Torv AMAGERBRO TORV Idéoplæg Amagerbro Torv 3 INDLEDNING FORORD BAGGRUND FOR OPGAVEN Som del af budget 2016 blev der afsat midler til udarbejdelse af et ideoplæg for Amagerbro Torv. Om- Dette idéoplæg er udarbejdet med det formål at skabe et visionært forslag for Amagerbro Torv, der på rådet omkring Amagerbro Torv har udviklet sig væsentligt siden torvet blev anlagt i sin nuværende form i et overordnet niveau udpeger stedets byrumsmæssige værdier og potentialer. Idéoplægget koncen- staten af årtusindet, det har således været ønsket at ideoplægget undersøger muligheden for en nutidig trerer sig om arealerne på selve Amagerbro Torv samt koblingen med henholdsvis Amagerbrogade, udformning af byrummet omkring Amagerbro Station. Holmbladsgade og Brysselgade. Ideoplægget skal sætte retning og skabe rammen for en ny udformning af torvet og er som sådan første Amagerbro Torv ligger i dag gemt 'inde bagved'. Pladsen fremstår som et uforløst og identitetsløst skridt hen imod en omdannelse af torvet. Intentionen er at ideoplægget balancerer mellem en masse transitrum, etableret i 2002 ved indvielsen af Amagerbro Station, hvor kvarteret med ét blev en del af praktiske bindinger som metroforplads, redningsvej og et stort cykelparkeringsbehov og så ønsket om hovedstadens metronetværk. Denne ændring har betydet en både fysisk og social forandring og ikke et torv der er smukkere, har et bedre fl ow, inviterer til ophold og er mere funktionelt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Danish Transport System, Facts and Figures
    The Danish Transport System Facts and Figures 2 | The Ministry of Transport Udgivet af: Ministry of Transport Frederiksholms Kanal 27 DK-1220 København K Udarbejdet af: Transportministeriet ISBN, trykt version: 978-87-91013-69-0 ISBN, netdokument: 978-87-91013-70-6 Forsideill.: René Strandbygaard Tryk: Rosendahls . Schultz Grafisk a/s Oplag: 500 Contents The Danish Transport System ......................................... 6 Infrastructure....................................................................7 Railway & Metro ........................................................ 8 Road Network...........................................................10 Fixed Links ............................................................... 11 Ports.......................................................................... 17 Airports.....................................................................18 Main Transport Corridors and Transport of Goods .......19 Domestic and International Transport of Goods .... 22 The Personal Transport Habits of Danes....................... 24 Means of Individual Transport................................ 25 Privately Owned Vehicles .........................................27 Passenger Traffic on Railways..................................27 Denmark - a Bicycle Nation..................................... 28 4 | The Ministry of Transport The Danish Transport System | 5 The Danish Transport System Danish citizens make use of the transport system every The Danish State has made large investments in new day to travel to
    [Show full text]
  • Circular Economy in Small Companies Within Amager Andrew Thomas Gray Worcester Polytechnic Institute
    Worcester Polytechnic Institute Digital WPI Interactive Qualifying Projects (All Years) Interactive Qualifying Projects April 2019 Circular Economy in Small Companies Within Amager Andrew Thomas Gray Worcester Polytechnic Institute Brian M. Ferrarotti Worcester Polytechnic Institute Jack Tyler Procaccini Worcester Polytechnic Institute Karly Bigham Worcester Polytechnic Institute Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/iqp-all Repository Citation Gray, A. T., Ferrarotti, B. M., Procaccini, J. T., & Bigham, K. (2019). Circular Economy in Small Companies Within Amager. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/iqp-all/5378 This Unrestricted is brought to you for free and open access by the Interactive Qualifying Projects at Digital WPI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Interactive Qualifying Projects (All Years) by an authorized administrator of Digital WPI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Project ID: KKO-1902 Circular Economy in Small Companies Within Amager An Interactive Qualifying Project submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Science By: Karly Bigham Brian Ferrarotti Andrew Gray Jack Procaccini Date: 29 April 2019 Dorte Grastrup-Hansen Karen Oates, Co-Advisor Project Sponsor Guillermo Salazar, Co-Advisor Miljøpunkt Amager Worcester Polytechnic Institute This report represents work of WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes
    [Show full text]
  • Best Shopping Centers/Malls in Copenhagen"
    "Best Shopping Centers/Malls in Copenhagen" Realizado por : Cityseeker 5 Ubicaciones indicadas Fisketorvet Shopping Center "Shopping Mall in the Center" This is the first real shopping mall in the center of Copenhagen. The name refers to the original use of the premises as the main Copenhagen fish market. The shopping center is an interesting experience; not only will you get to choose from more than 100 shops, 15 tempting restaurants and a huge cinema complex, but you will also see a beautiful piece of Danish by Infomastern architecture. Built on the waterfront over four floors, the center has excellent views. +45 3336 6400 www.fisketorvet.dk/ Kalvebod Brygge 59, Copenhague Frederiksberg Centre "Large & Modern Shopping Center" Frederiksberg Centeret is a large shopping center in the part of town northwest of Serne (the Lakes). It was built only recently and is quite an impressive piece of architecture. An enormous amount of glass has been used in the structure of this building, bringing light and an impression of space. The shopping center consists of a multitude of shops on two floors, by Ramblersen in different sizes and genres: fashion, food, books... practically everything you can think of. There are also cafés and restaurants. Furthermore, Frederiksberg Centre contains a fruit and vegetable market. The prices are about average but of course vary from shop to shop. Parking is free on the top floor of the shopping center. +45 3816 0340 www.frederiksberg-centret.dk Falkoner Allé 21, Frederiksberg Amager Centeret "Shopping Hub" Amager Centeret is a department store and shopping center combined on two floors.
    [Show full text]
  • Assesing Partculate Pollution in the Østerbro District of Copenhagen
    Assessing Particulate Pollution in the Østerbro District of Copenhagen By: John Bosworth, Marley G. Kapsimalis, Stephanie Piscitelli, Nathan Wiegman Assessing Particulate Pollution in the Østerbro District of Copenhagen An Interactive Qualifying Project Submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science In Cooperation With Miljøpunkt Østerbro By: John Bosworth Marley G. Kapsimalis Stephanie Piscitelli Nathan Wiegman Date: 3 May 2014 Report Submitted to: Professor Robert Kinicki Professor Steve Taylor [email protected] i ABSTRACT Ultrafine particulate (UFP) pollution causes 500 premature deaths annually in Copenha- gen, Denmark. This project, in conjunction with Miljøpunkt Østerbro, measured UFP using a P- Trak Ultrafine Particle Counter, near various schools and a large park in Østerbro district, chosen because children are at the greatest risk of developing long-term complications. Final measure- ments and analysis showed a strong correlation between the number of diesel engines and high concentrations of UFP, that UFP dissipates over distance, and solid noise barriers decrease the concentration in the immediate area. Using this data and additional observations, the team creat- ed a list of suggestions for businesses to reduce UFP emissions and strategies for individuals to avoid high UFP concentrations. This report represents work of WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of a degree requirement. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background
    [Show full text]
  • The Proliferation of Video Surveillance in Brussels and Copenhagen
    TOWARDS THE PANOPTIC CITY THE PROLIFERATION OF VIDEO SURVEILLANCE IN BRUSSELS AND COPENHAGEN This master thesis has been co-written by Corentin Debailleul and Pauline De Keersmaecker 4Cities UNICA Euromaster in Urban Studies 2012-2014 Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Supervisor : Mathieu Van Criekingen (Université Libre de Bruxelles) Second reader : Henrik Reeh (Københavns Universitet) Hence the major effect of the Panopticon: to induce in the inmate a state of conscious and permanent visibility that assures the automatic functioning of power. So to arrange things that the surveillance is permanent in its effects, even if it is discontinuous in its action; that the perfection of power should tend to render its actual exercise unnecessary; that this architectural apparatus should be a machine for creating and sustaining a power relation independent of the person who exercises it; in short, that the inmates should be caught up in a power situation of which they are themselves the bearers. To achieve this, it is at once too much and too little that the prisoner should be constantly observed by an inspector: too little, for what matters is that he knows himself to be observed; too much, because he has no need in fact of being so. In view of this, Bentham laid down the principle that power should be visible and unverifiable. Visible: the inmate will constantly have before his eyes the tall outline of the central tower from which he is spied upon. Unverifiable: the inmate must never know whether he is being looked at at any one moment; but he must be sure that he may always be so.
    [Show full text]
  • Stine Hagelskjær Jensen Cykelparkering I De Enkelte Bydele
    Bydel: Amager Øst og Amager Vest Tovholder: Stine Hagelskjær Jensen Cykelparkering i de enkelte bydele – gode eksempler Nr. Sted Hvorfor fungerer det godt 1 Amager Strand v. Øresundsstien Det er pænt og der er stor kapacitet 2 Prismen, Prags Boulevard Her er der ok cykelparkering – der er nok 3 Området omkring Amagerbro Metro Det er pænt og der er stor kapacitet station 4 Amagerbro Metro kælder Det er så fint med en kælder, der er god plads, dog svært at komme op og ned ad trappen 5 Metro ved DR Byen Det er pænt og ordnet – men kan blive et problem hvis der kommer flere cyklister i området 6 Langs husene på Egilsgade, Det ser ordentligt ud Gunløgsgade, Bergthoragade og Halfdansgade (Islands Brygge) 7 Tom Kristensensvej (høje huse) Cykelparkering under husene 8 Tietgenskollegiet Pænt, men der er problemer med kapaciteten 9 Sundholm Der er nok – ikke cykelkaos 10 Området omkring Sundby Kirke Pænt (Oliebladsgade/Amagerbrogade) 11 Langs Islandsbrygge God plads til cykelparkering Andre bydele/generelt Cykelparkering rundt om træer Det er pænt og beskytter træet Østerport st. Note: Østerbro bydel Lidt kaotisk lige nu pga. byggeri, men ellers fungerer det godt ikke udfyldt endnu Østerport under jorden (jeg ved ikke hvor det er) Elmegade På vejareal – virker godt Rådhusets bagindgang. Note: Dejligt med overdækket cykelparkering, lidt trangt nogle Rådhuspladsen er markeret af gange Vesterbro/Kongens Enghave lokaludvalg Japan Automatisk cykelparkering under jorden Stativløs parkering, opstribning Det virker godt og ser ikke rodet ud Cykelparkering i de enkelte bydele – problematiske steder Nr. Sted Hvem er det et problem for? Og Hvorfor 1 Amagerbrogade – hele strækningen De små stativer (sommerfugle) er i vejen for gående, man går ind i dem og der står ofte flere cykler end der er pladser 2 Strandlodsvej/Lergravsvej v.
    [Show full text]
  • Mini Parking Guide
    HOW TO PAY FOR PARKING PARKING PERMIT PARKING FINES You can pay by card at the pay stations Different types of parking permits are If you have received a parking fine, you can located in the streets. available to permanent residents and find information about it at parking.kk.dk. MINI businesses with a company address in Log in using the number plate of the vehicle Please note that you will be asked to enter Copenhagen. and the reference number of the parking your number plate. fine. Thereby, you will be able to see the PARKING You can view the location of the pay To find information about the different parking warden’s photos and explanation stations at kk.dk/p-automater. types of parking permits and select the and get guidance on how to pay or com- option that best covers your or your plain. GUIDE company’s needs, please go to NO PRINTED TICKET parking.kk.dk. This parking guide provides a quick overview of the Your payment is registered electronically. main parking rules in You will not receive a printed ticket to be placed in your car. Copenhagen. MOBILE PAYMENT You can pay via your smart phone, if you download an app from one of the providers displayed on the pay station. For more details, visit: international.kk.dk/parking PARKING RULES AND REGULATIONS TIME-RESTRICTED PARKING NO PARKING WHEN AND WHERE DO SIGNS APPLY? LOCAL RULES The rules and regulations applicable for In these areas, you need to Parking is not allowed, but Before and after: the sign applies on Please be aware that a parking permit or parking in Copenhagen are defined in the use your parking disc.
    [Show full text]
  • Cityringen Udredning Om En Afgrening Til Nordhavnen
    Oktober 2011 – Resumé City ringen Udredning om en afgrening til Nordhavnen Metroselskabet By & Havn Tekst Metroselskabet I/S Metrovej 5 2300 København S Telefon +45 3311 1700 By & Havn I/S Nordre Toldbod 7 Postboks 2083 1013 København K Telefon +45 3376 9800 Forsideillustration COBE, SLETH MODERNISM, Polyform Foto Side 16 Kontraframe Design og layout e-Types og India Tryk Cool Gray Indhold Metroen i en ny bydel 04 Trafi kken og byen 06 Anlægget 12 Økonomi 17 Den videre proces 19 4 Afgrening til Nordhavnen En ny bydel er på vej i Nordhavnen og ved at Hvad koster det? Metroen etablere en metrolinje som en afgrening fra Afgreningen til Nordhavnen vil koste om- City ringen til Nordhavnen, er der mulighed kring 2,9 milliarder kroner inklusiv reserver. for at sikre området, de kommende beboere Heraf vil behovet for et indskud fra Metro- i en ny bydel og de erhvervsdrivende en eff ektiv og miljø- selskabets samt By & Havns ejere udgøre venlig transportform. cirka 0,7 milliarder kroner. De resterende 75 procent af udgift erne fi nansieres af By & Havn samt Metroselskabet har ud- indtægter fra passagerer, ejendomsbidrag arbejdet “Udredning om en afgrening fra og bidrag fra Off entligt Privat Partnerskab City ringen til Nordhavnen”. Udredningen (OPP). har til formål at skabe grundlag for en poli- tisk beslutning om at anlægge en metrolinje Baggrund til Nordhavnen. Allerede under arbejdet med “Udredningen om City ringen” fra 2005 blev der set på, Udredningen kan downloades i sin fulde hvordan der kunne etableres en Nordhavns- form på www.m.dk og www.byoghavn.dk metro.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Annual Report 2017 2 Group Annual Report 2017
    LOOKING BACK MOVING FORWARD Company reg. no. (CVR) 14 70 72 04 GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2017 2 GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2017 Group Annual Report 2017 Pursuant to section 149(2) of the Danish CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS COPENHAGEN AIRPORTS A/S Financial Statements Act, the Group An- STATEMENT – RISK AND UNCERTAINTIES Lufthavnsboulevarden 6 2770 Kastrup nual Report is an extract of Copenhagen The section "Performance" on pages 24- This Annual Report includes forward-looking Denmark Airports’ complete Annual Report. The com- 68 presents how Copenhagen Airports statements as described in the US Private Tel.: +45 3231 3231 plete Annual Report, including the financial A/S (CPH) worked towards its non-financial Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Fax: +45 3231 3132 E-mail: [email protected] statements of the Parent Company, Copen- business targets in 2017 and the results it and similar acts of other jurisdictions on Web: www.cph.dk/en hagen Airports A/S (pages 164-177), and the achieved. Together with the non-financial forward-looking statements, including in Company reg. no. (CVR): 14 70 72 04 statutory corporate governance statement, statements, these pages make up CPH’s cor- particular statements concerning future rev- Established: 19 September 1990 Municipality of registered office: Tårnby can be downloaded at www.cph.dk/en. porate responsibility statement as required enues, operating profits, business expansion Following adoption at the Annual General by sections 99a and 99b of the Danish and investments. Such statements are subject TERMS USED Meeting, the complete Annual Report will Financial Statements Act. to risks and uncertainties, as various factors, Copenhagen Airports, CPH, the Group and also be available from the Danish Business many of which are beyond CPH’s control, the Company are used synonymously about Copenhagen Airports A/S consolidated with Authority (Erhvervsstyrelsen).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019 Metroselskabet I/S
    Metroselskabet I/S Annual Report Report Annual 2019 Annual Report 2019 Metroselskabet I/S Annual Report 2019 Contents Contents Foreword 4 Key Figures 7 2019 in Brief 8 Directors’ Report 10 Finances 13 Operation and Maintenance 24 Construction 32 Business Development 46 About Metroselskabet 48 Ownership 50 Board of Directors of Metroselskabet 52 Executive Management of Metroselskabet 55 Metroselskabet's Employees 56 Compliance Testing of Metroselskabet 57 Annual Accounts 58 Accounting Policies 60 Accounts 65 Management Endorsement 94 Independent Auditors’ Report 96 Appendix to the Directors’ Report 100 Long-Term Budget 102 3 Annual Report 2019 Foreword Foreword Metroselskabet’s result for 2019 before per cent. The company’s financial perfor- depreciation and write-downs is mance in 2019 thus exceeded expectations, significantly higher than expected and the result is assessed to be satisfactory. The result for 2019 before depreciation and write-downs is a profit of DKK 436 million, Continued increase in Metro which is DKK 164 million higher than ex- passenger numbers pected. The increase is primarily attribut- 78.8 million passengers took the Metro in able to higher passenger revenue due to 2019. This is an increase of around 22 per more customers than expected using the cent compared to last year, when 64.7 mil- Metro in 2019, as well as a higher fare per lion passengers took the Metro. Much of passenger than expected. The high passen- the growth in passenger numbers can be at- ger numbers mean that, for the first time tributed to the opening of the new M3 Cit- in its history, Metroselskabet achieved fare yring Metro line in September 2019.
    [Show full text]