DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix D – Maps and Appraisal Tables of Proposed Waste

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix D – Maps and Appraisal Tables of Proposed Waste Appendix D – Maps and appraisal tables of proposed waste management facilities Page Map legend D2 Breckland site maps D3 WS1 Land at Summer Lane, Carbrooke D3 WS2 Former mineral working at Heath Road, Snetterton D4 Broadland site maps D5 WS3 Land at Atlas Works, Norwich Road, Lenwade D5 WS4 Land off Long Lane, Ludham D6 King’s Lynn and West Norfolk site maps D7 WS5 – Land off Mill Drove, at Blackborough End landfill site D7 WS6 – Land north of Main Road, Crimplesham D8 Appraisal tables WS1 Land at Summer Lane, Carbrooke D9 WS2 Former mineral working at Heath Road, Snetterton D13 WS3 Land at Atlas Works, Norwich Road, Lenwade D17 WS4 Land off Long Lane, Ludham D22 WS5 Land off Mill Drove, at Blackborough End landfill site D26 WS6 Land north of Main Road, Crimplesham D30 Please note that there are no proposed sites located within the following Local Planning Authority Areas: Great Yarmouth, North Norfolk, South Norfolk. D1 D2 WS1 - Land at Summer Lane, Carbrooke D3 WS2 Former mineral working at Heath Road, Snetterton D4 WS3 Land at Atlas Works, Norwich Road, Lenwade D5 WS4 Land off Long Lane, Ludham D6 WS5 – Land east of Mill Drove, at Blackborough End landfill site D7 WS6 – Land at Main Road, Crimplesham D8 Appraisal tables of proposed waste management sites WS1 Land at Summer Lane, Carbrooke, IP25 6TJ Proposal: screening, separating and bulking of waste materials, composting and soil treatment. The site is proposed to take hazardous, non-hazardous and inert waste. Estimated throughput: 100,000 to 120,000 tonnes per annum Size of site: 9.3 ha SA Objective Comments Assessment of Waste Management Uses SA1: To adapt to The site is 0.27km from Watton and + and mitigate the 10km from Dereham, which are the The proposed waste management effects of climate nearest towns. uses require energy and therefore change by emit CO2. There would also be CO2 reducing emissions from road transportation contributions to to/from the nearest towns as a climate change minimum, and the nearest town is 0.27km away. SA2: To improve The site is not within an AQMA. The - air quality in line proposed development is likely to result Vehicle movements are likely to with the National in the number of vehicle movements increase, so would be likely to affect Air Quality increasing. air quality due to vehicle emissions. Standards SA3: To The nearest residential property is 130m - minimise noise, from the site boundary, there are 13 The proposed waste management vibration and sensitive receptors within 250m of the uses are not expected to cause visual intrusion site boundary. The settlement of vibration. It is considered that noise Carbrooke is 130m away. and dust can be mitigated to The effect on visual intrusion is assessed acceptable levels within 250m of the under objective SA8. source; the greatest impacts will be within 100m, if uncontrolled. Noise and dust assessments, and mitigation measures to appropriately control any amenity impacts, must form part of any planning application for waste management uses. SA4: To improve Waste management sites are unlikely to 0 accessibility to provide improved accessibility to services No effects expected jobs, services and facilities and reduce social exclusion. and facilities and The effect on employment is assessed reduce social under objective SA13. exclusion SA5: To -- maintain and The nearest Listed building is 140m A Heritage Statement would be enhance the away and is the Grade II Mill House. required to support any future character of the There are 28 Listed Buildings within 2km planning application. The heritage townscape and of the site. statement should identify potential historic impacts to heritage assets and environment suggest appropriate mitigation. The nearest Scheduled Monument is 0.54km from the site and is the Site of No effects expected due to the Commandry of St John of Jerusalem; it is location of the Scheduled Monument the only Scheduled Monument within north of housing in Carbrooke. 2km of the site. D9 SA Objective Comments Assessment of Waste Management Uses Carbrooke Conservation Area is 1km from the site and is the only Conservation Area within 2km of the site. No effects expected There are no Registered Historic Parks and Gardens within 2km of the site. No adverse effects The site is a current mineral extraction site which has been largely extracted, No adverse effects and archaeology was addressed through the mineral extraction planning permission. SA6: To protect There are no Ramsar sites within 10km 0 and enhance of the site boundary. Norfolk’s Breckland SAC is 4.3km from the site biodiversity and boundary. The proposed site is located outside geodiversity Breckland SPA is 5.1km from the site the 2km Impact Risk Zone for boundary. composting, mechanical and Thompson Water Carr and Common biological waste treatment for all SSSI (part of Norfolk Valley Fens SAC) is SSSIs, SPAs, SACs and Ramsar 4.3km from the site boundary. sites. Due to distance, there would Wayland Wood, Watton SSSI is 2.4km be no impacts on SSSIs, SPAs, from the site boundary. SACs or Ramsar sites. Scoulton Mere SSSI is 3.1km from the site boundary. Potter’s Bar Cranworth SSSI is 3.8km from the site boundary. The nearest County Wildlife Site is CWS Due to this distance, no impacts on 2091 ‘Watton Airfield-Army Training this CWS are expected. Area’ which is 0.52km from the site boundary. The nearest ancient woodland site is Due to this distance, no impacts on Wayland Wood which is an Ancient and this ancient woodland are expected. Semi-Natural Woodland; it is 2.4km from the site boundary. Geodiversity would have been This site is an active mineral working. addressed as part of the mineral planning permission. SA7: To The site is an active mineral site nearing -- promote the end of its operational life. An The approved restoration scheme innovative approved restoration scheme forms part would provide biodiversity gains. solutions for the of the mineral permission. The Therefore, the proposed permanent restoration and restoration is due to be completed by waste management use would result after use of 2025. The restoration is to be mainly to in the loss of these gains. waste agricultural land with the northern area management restored to trees, scrub and wildflower sites meadow, to provide biodiversity gains. As such, when restored the site will be classified as countryside. D10 SA Objective Comments Assessment of Waste Management Uses SA8: To protect The site is not located within the AONB, -- and enhance the a Core River Valley or any other The mineral site would on restoration quality and designated landscape feature. by classified as countryside, and distinctiveness The site is a current mineral extraction such sites are specifically excluded of the site bordered to the east by Mill Lane, to from the definition of ‘previously countryside and the west by Summer Lane, with an developed land’. Permanent waste landscape existing mineral processing site to the management uses are not generally south. To the north, there is a small suitable within the open countryside. agricultural field with an isolated A screening scheme would need to woodland block separating the site from be in place to address any gaps to the settlement of Carbrooke. Hedges, the boundary hedges. including along Mill Lane and Summer Lane provide site screening; SA9: To There is a Public Right of Way adjacent - contribute to to the most northern boundary of the site, it is considered that appropriate improved health Carbrooke FP3, which runs between mitigation measures to ensure no and amenity of Summer Lane and Mill Lane. unacceptable impacts could be local conditioned. communities in The nearest residential property is 130m Norfolk from the site boundary, and there are 13 sensitive receptors within 250m of the site boundary. SA10: To The site is located over a Major aquifer -/- protect and with intermediate vulnerability. The A planning application for waste enhance water south-west corner of the site is within management uses at this site would and soil quality groundwater Source Protection Zone 1 need to include a Hydrogeological in Norfolk (SPZ1) whilst the rest of the site is within Risk Assessment to identify any groundwater SPZ2. potential impacts to groundwater and appropriate mitigation measures. The Agricultural Land Classification The land is not in agricultural use, scheme classifies the land as being and the approved restoration Grade 3, although it has not been scheme would restore a proportion agricultural land for a number of years of the site to agricultural land. The and is currently a mineral extraction site. proposed permanent waste management use would result in the permanent loss of agricultural land. SA11: To The site is 0.27km from Watton and ++ promote 10km from Dereham. These are the Due to distance to nearest sustainable use nearest settlements allocated for settlement allocated for significant of waste significant growth in the adopted Local growth, and the potential to move management Plan. waste up the hierarchy which is resources The proposed waste management uses more sustainable. would increase waste management capacity and could potentially move waste up the waste hierarchy. SA12: To reduce The site is in Flood Zone 1 (lowest risk) ++ the risk of for flooding from rivers. The site has a The site is at low risk of being current and low risk of surface water flooding with affected by flooding from either future flooding at three locations of surface water pooling rivers; the sea or surface water. new and existing in a 1 in 30-year rainfall event, three Non-hazardous waste management development more locations in a 1 in 100-year rainfall uses are a ‘less vulnerable’ land use D11 SA Objective Comments Assessment of Waste Management Uses event, and a further location in a 1 in which is suitable in this flood zone.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Appendix A Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Draft March 2015 1 Blank 2 Part One - Flooding and Flood Risk Management Contents PART ONE – FLOODING AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ..................... 5 1. Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 2 What Is Flooding? ........................................................................... 8 3. What is Flood Risk? ...................................................................... 10 4. What are the sources of flooding? ................................................ 13 5. Sources of Local Flood Risk ......................................................... 14 6. Sources of Strategic Flood Risk .................................................... 17 7. Flood Risk Management ............................................................... 19 8. Flood Risk Management Authorities ............................................. 22 PART TWO – FLOOD RISK IN NORFOLK .................................................. 30 9. Flood Risk in Norfolk ..................................................................... 30 Flood Risk in Your Area ................................................................ 39 10. Broadland District .......................................................................... 39 11. Breckland District .......................................................................... 45 12. Great Yarmouth Borough .............................................................. 51 13. Borough of King’s
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Statement of Common Ground Natural England
    Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Statement of Common Ground Natural England Applicant: Norfolk Vanguard Limited Document Reference: Rep1 - SOCG - 13.1 Revision: 1 Date: January 2019 Author: Royal HaskoningDHV Photo: Kentish Flats Offshore Wind Farm Date Issue Remarks / Reason for Issue Author Checked Approved No. 22/08/18 00 First draft for Internal review GK/ST JA JA 23/08/18 01D First draft for Norfolk Vanguard Limited review GK/ST JA JA 05/09/18 02D Second draft for legal review GK/ST JA JA 10/10/2018 03D Third draft for Norfolk Vanguard Limited review GK/JA AD AD 17/10/18 04D Fourth draft for Norfolk Vanguard Limited review GK JA JA 12/11/18 05D Fifth draft for Norfolk Vanguard Limited review GK JA JA 20/11/18 06D Sixth draft for Norfolk Vanguard Limited review GK JA JA 03/01/19 07D Seventh draft GK/JA GK/JA JA 08/01/19 08D Eighth draft GK/JA GK/JA JA 11/01/19 09D Submission for Deadline 1 GK/JA GK/JA RS Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Page i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 The Development ......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Consultation with Natural England ................................................................ 2 2 Statement of Common Ground ..................................................................... 3 2.1 Marine Geology, Oceanography and Physical Processes ................................. 3 2.2 Benthic and Intertidal Ecology ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Council Tax Rates 2020 - 2021
    BRECKLAND COUNCIL NOTICE OF SETTING OF COUNCIL TAX Notice is hereby given that on the twenty seventh day of February 2020 Breckland Council, in accordance with Section 30 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, approved and duly set for the financial year beginning 1st April 2020 and ending on 31st March 2021 the amounts as set out below as the amount of Council Tax for each category of dwelling in the parts of its area listed below. The amounts below for each parish will be the Council Tax payable for the forthcoming year. COUNCIL TAX RATES 2020 - 2021 A B C D E F G H A B C D E F G H NORFOLK COUNTY 944.34 1101.73 1259.12 1416.51 1731.29 2046.07 2360.85 2833.02 KENNINGHALL 1194.35 1393.40 1592.46 1791.52 2189.63 2587.75 2985.86 3583.04 NORFOLK POLICE & LEXHAM 1182.24 1379.28 1576.32 1773.36 2167.44 2561.52 2955.60 3546.72 175.38 204.61 233.84 263.07 321.53 379.99 438.45 526.14 CRIME COMMISSIONER BRECKLAND 62.52 72.94 83.36 93.78 114.62 135.46 156.30 187.56 LITCHAM 1214.50 1416.91 1619.33 1821.75 2226.58 2631.41 3036.25 3643.49 LONGHAM 1229.13 1433.99 1638.84 1843.70 2253.41 2663.12 3072.83 3687.40 ASHILL 1212.28 1414.33 1616.37 1818.42 2222.51 2626.61 3030.70 3636.84 LOPHAM NORTH 1192.57 1391.33 1590.09 1788.85 2186.37 2583.90 2981.42 3577.70 ATTLEBOROUGH 1284.23 1498.27 1712.31 1926.35 2354.42 2782.50 3210.58 3852.69 LOPHAM SOUTH 1197.11 1396.63 1596.15 1795.67 2194.71 2593.74 2992.78 3591.34 BANHAM 1204.41 1405.14 1605.87 1806.61 2208.08 2609.55 3011.01 3613.22 LYNFORD 1182.24 1379.28 1576.32 1773.36 2167.44 2561.52 2955.60 3546.72
    [Show full text]
  • Contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (Are Distinguished by Letter Code, Given Below) Those from 1801-13 Have Also Been Transcribed and Have No Code
    Norfolk Family History Society Norfolk Marriages 1801-1837 The contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (are distinguished by letter code, given below) those from 1801-13 have also been transcribed and have no code. ASt All Saints Hel St. Helen’s MyM St. Mary in the S&J St. Simon & St. And St. Andrew’s Jam St. James’ Marsh Jude Aug St. Augustine’s Jma St. John McC St. Michael Coslany Ste St. Stephen’s Ben St. Benedict’s Maddermarket McP St. Michael at Plea Swi St. Swithen’s JSe St. John Sepulchre McT St. Michael at Thorn Cle St. Clement’s Erh Earlham St. Mary’s Edm St. Edmund’s JTi St. John Timberhill Pau St. Paul’s Etn Eaton St. Andrew’s Eth St. Etheldreda’s Jul St. Julian’s PHu St. Peter Hungate GCo St. George Colegate Law St. Lawrence’s PMa St. Peter Mancroft Hei Heigham St. GTo St. George Mgt St. Margaret’s PpM St. Peter per Bartholomew Tombland MtO St. Martin at Oak Mountergate Lak Lakenham St. John Gil St. Giles’ MtP St. Martin at Palace PSo St. Peter Southgate the Baptist and All Grg St. Gregory’s MyC St. Mary Coslany Sav St. Saviour’s Saints The 25 Suffolk parishes Ashby Burgh Castle (Nfk 1974) Gisleham Kessingland Mutford Barnby Carlton Colville Gorleston (Nfk 1889) Kirkley Oulton Belton (Nfk 1974) Corton Gunton Knettishall Pakefield Blundeston Cove, North Herringfleet Lound Rushmere Bradwell (Nfk 1974) Fritton (Nfk 1974) Hopton (Nfk 1974) Lowestoft Somerleyton The Norfolk parishes 1 Acle 36 Barton Bendish St Andrew 71 Bodham 106 Burlingham St Edmond 141 Colney 2 Alburgh 37 Barton Bendish St Mary 72 Bodney 107 Burlingham
    [Show full text]
  • Meadow Barn Scoulton | Norfolk Picture Perfect Panoramas
    MEADOW BARN SCOULTON | NORFOLK PICTURE PERFECT PANORAMAS “Watch the seasons change over the countryside, with breathtaking beauty your rural surrounds. Perfectly placed to make the most of its setting, at this inviting barn character abounds. From the features within to the landscaped gardens outside, it’s clear this is a charming place in which to reside. So peaceful and secluded yet with the town a minute away, come visit this home and you’ll want to stay!” • A very impressive Semi-Detached Barn Conversion, enjoying a fabulous Rural Location to the Outskirts of the village of Scoulton • Three Bedrooms; Two Bathrooms; Three Receptions • Spacious Breakfast Kitchen with Separate Utility • Original Character with Vaulted Ceilings, Exposed Beams, Exposed Brick, Timber Floors, Oak Floors and Fireplaces • Under Floor Heating throughout the Ground Floor • Part Converted Double Garage provides an Office/Studio and Shower Room • Additional Parking for Several Vehicles • Formal Gardens and a Paddock extend to 0.55 acres • The Accommodation extends to 2,086sq.ft • Energy Rating: D A beautifully converted barn in an idyllic position with a far-reaching outlook, these really are rooms with a view. You feel as though you’re in your own corner of the countryside but you’re actually one of a handful of barns in this group and just a few minute’s drive from the gorgeous Georgian town of Hingham, where you’ll find a wide range of amenities very conveniently situated. A Better Balance It was both the location and the character that drew the owners to their home: “We love the individual nature of barns and we love the countryside, so the combination here completely won us over.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan
    Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report May 2021 Habitats Regulations Assessment of the South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan Regulation 18 HRA Report LC- 654 Document Control Box Client South Norfolk Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Report Title Regulation 18 – HRA Report Status FINAL Filename LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Date May 2021 Author SC Reviewed ND Approved ND Photo: Female broad bodied chaser by Shutterstock Regulation 18 – HRA Report May 2021 LC-654_South Norfolk_Regulation 18_HRA Report_8_140521SC.docx Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 The South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................... 3 2.1 Greater Norwich Local Plan .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 South Norfolk Village Cluster Housing Allocations Plan ................................................................................ 3 2.3 Village Clusters ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Marriott's Way Circular Route Guide
    MARRIOTT’S WAY CIRCULAR ROUTE GUIDE WELCOME TO MARRIOTT’S WAY MARRIOTT’S WAY is a 26-mile linear trail for riders, walkers and cyclists. Opened in 1991, it follows part of the route of two former Victorian railway lines, The Midland and Great Northern (M&GN) and Great Eastern Railway (GER). It is named in honour of William Marriott, who was chief engineer and manager of the M&GN for 41 years between 1883 and 1924. Both lines were established in the 1880s to transport passengers, livestock and industrial freight. The two routes were joined by the ‘Themelthorpe Curve’ in 1960, which became the sharpest bend on the entire British railway network. Use of the lines reduced after the Second World War. Passenger traffic ceased in 1959, but the transport of concrete ensured that freight trains still used the lines until 1985. The seven circular walks and two cycle loops in this guide encourage you to head off the main Marriott’s Way route and explore the surrounding areas that the railway served. Whilst much has changed, there’s an abundance of hidden history to be found. Many of the churches, pubs, farms and station buildings along these circular routes would still be familiar to the railway passengers of 100 years ago. 2 Marriott’s Way is a County Wildlife Site and passes through many interesting landscapes rich in wonderful countryside, wildlife, sculpture and a wealth of local history. The walks and cycle loops described in these pages are well signposted by fingerposts and Norfolk Trails’ discs. You can find all the circular trails in this guide covered by OS Explorer Map 238.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Appendix 22.14 Norfolk Vanguard Onshore Ecology Consultation Responses
    Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Appendix 22.14 Norfolk Vanguard Onshore Ecology Consultation Responses Preliminary Environmental Information Report Volume 3 Author: Royal HaskoningDHV Applicant: Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: PB5640-005-2214 Date: October 2018 Photo: Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm Date Issue Remarks / Reason for Issue Author Checked Approved No. 20/07/18 01D First draft for Norfolk Boreas Limited review GC CD DT 20/09/18 01F Final for PEIR submission GC CD AD/JL Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 2 Consultation responses Norfolk Vanguard ............................................................... 1 3 References ........................................................................................................... 27 Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page ii Tables Table 2.1 Norfolk Vanguard Consultation Responses 2 Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page iii Glossary of Acronyms CoCP Code of Construction Practice DCO Development Consent Order EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ES Environmental Statement ETG Expert Topic Group HVAC High Voltage Alternating Current HVDC High Voltage Direct Current PEIR Preliminary Environmental Information Report SoS Secretary of State Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page iv This page is intentionally blank. Preliminary Environmental Information Report Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm PB5640-005-2214 October 2018 Page v 1 Introduction 1. Consultation is a key driver of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process, and throughout the lifecycle of the project, from the initial stages through to consent and post-consent. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • David Tyldesley and Associates Planning, Landscape and Environmental Consultants
    DAVID TYLDESLEY AND ASSOCIATES PLANNING, LANDSCAPE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Document Durwyn Liley, Rachel Hoskin, John Underhill-Day & David Tyldesley 1 DRAFT Date: 7th November 2008 Version: Draft Recommended Citation: Liley, D., Hoskin, R., Underhill-Day, J. & Tyldesley, D. (2008). Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Document. Footprint Ecology, Wareham, Dorset. Report for Breckland District Council. 2 Summary This document records the results of a Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) of Breckland District Council’s Core Strategy. The Breckland District lies in an area of considerable importance for nature conservation with a number of European Sites located within and just outside the District. The range of sites, habitats and designations is complex. Taking an area of search of 20km around the District boundary as an initial screening for relevant protected sites the assessment identified five different SPAs, ten different SACs and eight different Ramsar sites. Following on from this initial screening the assessment identifies the following potential adverse effects which are addressed within the appropriate assessment: • Reduction in the density of Breckland SPA Annex I bird species (stone curlew, nightjar, woodlark) near to new housing. • Increased levels of recreational activity resulting in increased disturbance to Breckland SPA Annex I bird species (stone curlew, nightjar, woodlark). • Increased levels of people on and around the heaths, resulting in an increase in urban effects such as increased fire risk, fly-tipping, trampling. • Increased levels of recreation to the Norfolk Coast (including the Wash), potentially resulting in disturbance to interest features and other recreational impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Norfolk & Norwich
    BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY) TRANSACTIONS 2 7 JUN 1984 exchanged OF GENfcriAL LIBRARY THE NORFOLK & NORWICH NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY Edited by: P. W. Lambley Vol. 26 Part 5 MAY 1984 TRANSACTIONS OF THE NORFOLK AND NORWICH NATURALISTS’ SOCIETY Volume 26 Part 5 (May 1984) Editor P. W. Lambley ISSN 0375 7226 U: ' A M «SEUV OFFICERS OF THE SOCIETY 1984-85 j> URAL isSTORY) 2? JUH1984 President: Dr. R. E. Baker Vice-Presidents: P. R. Banham, A. Bull, K. B. Clarke, E. T. Daniels, K. C. Durrant, E. A. Ellis, R. Jones, M. J. Seago, J. A. Steers, E. L. Swann, F. J. Taylor-Page Chairman: Dr. G. D. Watts, Barn Meadow, Frost’s Lane, Gt. Moulton. Secretary: Dr. R. E. Baker, 25 Southern Reach, Mulbarton, NR 14 8BU. Tel. Mulbarton 70609 Assistant Secretary: R. N. Flowers, Heatherlands, The Street, Brundall. Treasurer: D. A. Dorling, St. Edmundsbury, 6 New Road, Heathersett. Tel. Norwich 810318 Assistant Treasurer: M. Wolner Membership Committee: R. Hancy, Tel. Norwich 860042 Miss J. Wakefield, Post Office Lane, Saxthorpe, NR1 1 7BL. Programme Committee: A. Bull, Tel. Norwich 880278 Mrs. J. Robinson, Tel. Mulbarton 70576 Publications Committee: R. Jones. P. W. Lambley & M. J. Seago (Editors) Research Committee: Dr. A. Davy, School of Biology, U.E.A., Mrs. A. Brewster Hon. Auditor. J. E. Timbers, The Nook, Barford Council: Retiring 1985; D. Fagg, J. Goldsmith, Miss F. Musters, R. Smith. Retiring 1986 Miss R. Carpenter, C. Dack, Mrs. J. Geeson, R. Robinson. Retiring 1987 N. S. Carmichael, R. Evans, Mrs.L. Evans, C. Neale Co-opted members: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Breckland Definitive Statement of Public Rights Of
    Norfolk County Council Definitive Statement of Public Rights of Way District of Breckland Contains public sector information c Norfolk County Council; Available for re-use under the Open Government Licence v3: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ Statement downloaded 16th January 2021; latest version available online at: https://www.norfolk.gov.uk/out-and-about-in-norfolk/public-rights-of-way/ map-and-statement-of-public-rights-of-way-in-norfolk/definitive-statements Document compiled by Robert Whittaker; http://robert.mathmos.net/ PARISH OF ASHILL Footpath No. 1 (South Pickenham/Watton Road to Houghton Common Road). Starts from fieldgate on South Pickenham/Watton Road and runs eastwards to enter Houghton Common Road opposite western end of Footpath No. 5. Bridleway No. 2 (South Pickenham/Watton Road to Peddars Way). Starts from South Pickenham/Watton Road and runs south westwards and enters Peddars Way by Caudle Hill. Footpath No 5 (Houghton Common to Church Farm) Starts from Houghton Common Road opposite the eastern end of Footpath No. 1 and runs eastwards to TF 880046. From this point onwards the width of the path is 1.5 metres and runs north along the eastern side of a drainage ditch for approximately 94 metres to TF 879047 where it turns to run in an easterly direction along the southern side of a drainage ditch for approximately 275 metres to TF 882048. The path then turns south running on the western side of a drainage ditch for approximately 116 metres to TF 882046, then turns eastwards to the south of a drainage ditch for approximately 50 metres to TF 883047 where it turns to run southwards on the western side of a drainage ditch for approximately 215 metres to TF 883044 thereafter turning west along the northern side of a drainage ditch and hedge for approximately 120 metres to TF 882044.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild in the City ’ 21 May – 5 June
    Wild in the City ’ 21 May – 5 June Celebrating our 90th anniversary we’ve brought our spectacular nature reserves to Norwich! Discover 10 nature reserves around the city, beautifully photographed by artist Richard Osbourne and accompanied by sounds of nature by Richard Fair. Find the last one above the doors to The Forum where Norfolk Wildlife Trust has a huge range of activities, art and wildlife experts for families and adults alike. Photo competition Eastern Daily Press is running a photo competition this summer with a special section for Norfolk Wildlife Trust all about Norfolk’s nature. Launched in May, there are categories for children and adults, with four sections in total. Pictures will be shortlisted in September. All shortlisted pictures will be printed in the EDP and there will be an exhibition and awards night with prizes in October. For more details and how to enter visit: http://nwtru.st/photocomp Find our nature reserves in these shop windows: Cotswold Outdoor HSBC Bank Dipples Museum of Norwich The Forum Dawn in early spring at Theatre Street, London Street, Swan Lane, Bridewell Alley, Millennium Plain, “ Holme Dunes is of skylark NR2 1RG NR2 1LG NR2 1JA NR2 1AQ NR2 1TF song and the whetstone NWT RANWORTH BROAD NWT HICKLING BROAD NWT FOXLEY WOOD NWT WAYLAND WOOD NWT HOLME DUNES call of grey partridge; the shrieking oystercatcher and the three-note redshank on Jessops White Stuff Jarrold The Book Hive LUSH the saltmarsh; inland the Davey Place, London Street, Bedford Street, London Street, Gentleman’s Walk, warm chomp of cattle in the NR2 1PQ NR2 1LD NR2 1DA NR2 1HL NR2 1NA grass, and the whinny still of northbound wigeon.
    [Show full text]