Beyond the Egalitarian Get

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Beyond the Egalitarian Get Beyond the Egalitarian Get n the Orthodox world (and in the ing out of it, no way to rectib it. Conservative world as well) aget, From the Orthodox perspective, non- I or a Jewish divorce document, is Orthodox Jewry has created many given from the man to the woman. problems. Most of them, however, Because of this fact, and because of are rectifiable. But when a rabbi does the fact that the man must give the not require a get in order to officiate get of his own free will, the situation at a remarriage, any children from arises on occasion when a woman is this marriage are mamzerim in the trapped in a marriage she no longer eyes of the halakhah. wants to be in, thus making her what Theoretically, a woman can also is known as an agunah (a "chained refuse a get, but the man is not guilry 7, . woman, l.e., one who cannot re- of adultery if he remarries. Polygamy marry). Recalcitrant husbands (as (the marriage of a man to multiple the get-refusing husbands are called) women) is only forbidden by the rab- are not the only cause of agunah. A bis (derabanan) but not the Torah woman can also become an agunah (debraita). Also, the incidence of if her husband disappears and is pre- women refusing to receive a get ap- sumed to be dead, although halakhic pears to be less frequent than the in- authorities try to find ways (as they cidence of a man refusing to give a do, to a lesser degree, in the case of a get. Or, alternatively, the rabbinic recalcitrant husband) to permit these courts are able to find halakhic solu- women to remarry. If a women who tions allowing men to remarry more is an agunah gets married or engages easily because the prohibition is only in sex, the relationship is considered derabanan. There are few cases of the adulterous (she is still considered male equivalent of an agunah. married) and any offspring are con- sidered mamzerim or illegitimate. Alternative Approaches Mamzerim may only marry other The non-Orthodox Jewish move- mamzerim. Being a mamzer is a per- ments have responded to the non- manent problem; there is no convert- egalitarian nature of the get ritual and Rabbi Leah Richman graduated from the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College in June 2000, and serves the Oheb Zedek Synagogue Center in Pottsville, PA. 48 Sprig2000 The Reconstrrtrtinn;.+ the problem of agunah that results structs its rabbis to explain these from it in various ways. The Reform ramifications to the potential divor- movement considers a civil divorce cees. The RRA feels responsible for sufficient to allow remarriage. The explaining to the potential divorcees Conservative movement still requires that if they remarry on the basis of a get- in order to remarry. However, this get that any future children they out of concern for the problem of might have will be considered mam- agunah, many Conservative rabbis zerim by Orthodox and Conservative include a clause in the ketubah (called rabbis. the Lieberman clause after its author, We also feel that the couple should Prof. Saul Lieberman) through which understand the traditional gender in- the bride and groom give the Con- equality in a get. To prevent the servative Beit Din (rabbinic court) woman from ever being an agunah we the power to penalize the recalcitrant require the husband to sign a state- spouse. ment saying that if his wife ever re- The Reconstructionist Rabbinical quests a second get in order to re- Association (RRA) has its own get- marry that he will give one to her. procedure. It is often cited as one of Following is a careful discussion of the examples of how Reconstruction- this requirement. ism differs from Reform Judaism. In- stead of discarding- a ritual that no Trying to Cover All Bases longer seems meaningful, we recon- struct it to our values. Recognizing The instructions given to rabbis the need for religious ritualat the for the RRA "Egalitarian Get Proce- dissolution of a relationship, Recon- dure" (revised 12/95) include the fol- structionism took an old form and lowing statement: "At the beginning gave it new meaning and power. of this process [meaning the divorce The Reconstructionist get is egali- process] it is required that you ex- tarian. Either party can initiate, or plain the possible ramifications of it can be initiated jointly. The RRA agunah and mamzerim." Education is encourages the execution of a get be- extremely important in this area con- fore remarriage. Rabbis have various sidering the issues as they have been policies as to whether they require a outlined above. The instructions get for remarriage, and each case is continue, "Because of these two is- dealt with individually. Therefore, sues have only the husband sign the there is no issue of agunah in Recon- 'Informed Consent' page." The "In- structionist Judaism. formed Consent" page reads as fol- Our movement, being the only lows: one to have an alternative get proce- "Dear , dure, and recognizing the possible Please be aware that this Recon- ramifications of remarrying on the structionist Egalitarian Get may not basis of a get not accepted by all, in- be accepted by some Orthodox or The Reconstructionist Spring2000 47 Conservative rabbis. In the interest rabbi's obligation to explain the pos- of klal Yirrael and shalom am please sible ramifications of agunah. "At the read the below statement and sign beginning of the process it is required this form. that you explain the possible ramifi- "I seek to obtain a Reconstruc- cations of agunah and mamzerim." tionist Egalitarian Get with full Each rabbi will interpret this obli- knowledge and understanding of the gation differently. I imagine that above statement. I agree to cooper- most rabbis would explain to the ate fully in obtaining another Get couple something similar to this: should one be required by another "Although I consider this get to be a rabbi for the purpose of remarriage. severance of your marriage and to al- ,> Signature -- low remarriage should you choose, there are other rabbis, particularly Educational Objectives some Orthodox or Conservative rab- bis, who will not see this get as legiti- There are four values that are im- mate and therefore will not consider plied by the instructions given to rab- you divorced. They would require bis and by the letter of consent for another get before officiating at your the husband. The instructions to the remarriage. get imply a value to educate the "The non-egalitarian get can only couple about 1) agunah, and 2) mam- be given with the husband's consent. zerut. The letter of consent, on the This means that women can often be other hand, cites the values of pro- trapped in marriage, unable to re- moting 3) klal Yisrael and 4) shalom marry. Partly to prevent this occur- am. The instructions for the get re- rence, we will require you (husband) quire educating the couple about to sign a form saying that if your wife agunah and mamzerut and note that ever needs another get for remarriage for those reasons, only the husband that you will not withhold it from should sign the consent form. How- her." ever, the consent form itself has no Mamzerim: The rabbi is also re- mention of those issues, but rather quired to explain to the couple that mentions different values, klal Yisrael any rabbi (or Jew, for that matter) and shalom am. It is important to who does not consider the get valid examine the reasons why these val- will consider any future children the ues ate different from one another. woman has as mamzerim, or children In order to do this, it is important to of an adulterous relationship. This separate them. is because the woman is still consid- ered married to her former husband. Values of an Egalitarian Get Mamzerim are considered by some to be outcasts and some rabbis would Agunah: Reading the instructions never officiate at their possible future for the get, one notes that it is the wedding ceremony unless it was to 50 Spring 2000 rpl - another mamzer. conflict between the "two sides" is. I The rabbi might explain that ac- would guess that the Conservatives cording to these rabbis and Jews, only and Orthodox are upset that we are a married woman can give- birth to officiating at divorces that they do mamzerim. According to Jewish law, not necessarily consider to be in ac- these Jews would explain, adultery al- cordance with halakhah. This could ways involves a married woman. lead to either person's anger at those Therefore, if the husband were to re- movements when being told that they marry and have children, his children need another get. This type of anger woulh not be considered mamzerim between rabbi and potential marrieds unless his future wife was also previ- is not good for klal Yisrael. If the pre- ously married without aget (aget they vious recipient of our get was insulted consider legitimate). enough, it could even lead to him or I would also explain that the rea- her turning away from those move- son a woman without a get cannot ments after having approached them remarry, according to some Conser- for marriage officiation, and instead vatives and Orthodox, is not only be- going on to marry through some cause it would be considered an adul- other rabbi and producing what some terous relationship, but also because consider mamzerim. any future children would be consid- The Conservative and Orthodox ered mamzerim. might argue that had we never got- ten into the get business in the first Wider Concerns place, there would be much less po- tential friction.
Recommended publications
  • Getting Your Get At
    Getting your Get at www.gettingyourget.co.uk Information for Jewish men and women in England, Wales and Scotland about divorce according to Jewish law with articles, forms and explanations for lawyers. by Sharon Faith BA (Law) (Hons) and Deanna Levine MA LLB The website at www.gettingyourget.co.uk is sponsored by Barnett Alexander Conway Ingram, Solicitors, London 1 www.gettingyourget.co.uk Dedicated to the loving memory of Sharon Faith’s late parents, Maisie and Dr Oswald Ross (zl) and Deanna Levine’s late parents, Cissy and Ellis Levine (zl) * * * * * * * * Published by Cissanell Publications PO Box 12811 London N20 8WB United Kingdom ISBN 978-0-9539213-5-5 © Sharon Faith and Deanna Levine First edition: February 2002 Second edition: July 2002 Third edition: 2003 Fourth edition: 2005 ISBN 0-9539213-1-X Fifth edition: 2006 ISBN 0-9539213-4-4 Sixth edition: 2008 ISBN 978-0-9539213-5-5 2 www.gettingyourget.co.uk Getting your Get Information for Jewish men and women in England, Wales and Scotland about divorce according to Jewish law with articles, forms and explanations for lawyers by Sharon Faith BA (Law) (Hons) and Deanna Levine MA LLB List of Contents Page Number Letters of endorsement. Quotes from letters of endorsement ……………………………………………………………. 4 Acknowledgements. Family Law in England, Wales and Scotland. A note for the reader seeking divorce…………. 8 A note for the lawyer …………….…….. …………………………………………………………………………………….. 9 Legislation: England and Wales …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10 Legislation: Scotland ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 1. Who needs a Get? .……………………………………………………………………………….…………………... 14 2. What is a Get? ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 14 3. Highlighting the difficulties ……………………………………………………………………………….………….. 15 4. Taking advice from your lawyer and others ……………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • The Marriage Issue
    Association for Jewish Studies SPRING 2013 Center for Jewish History The Marriage Issue 15 West 16th Street The Latest: New York, NY 10011 William Kentridge: An Implicated Subject Cynthia Ozick’s Fiction Smolders, but not with Romance The Questionnaire: If you were to organize a graduate seminar around a single text, what would it be? Perspectives THE MAGAZINE OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR JEWISH STUDIES Table of Contents From the Editors 3 From the President 3 From the Executive Director 4 The Marriage Issue Jewish Marriage 6 Bluma Goldstein Between the Living and the Dead: Making Levirate Marriage Work 10 Dvora Weisberg Married Men 14 Judith Baskin ‘According to the Law of Moses and Israel’: Marriage from Social Institution to Legal Fact 16 Michael Satlow Reading Jewish Philosophy: What’s Marriage Got to Do with It? 18 Susan Shapiro One Jewish Woman, Two Husbands, Three Laws: The Making of Civil Marriage and Divorce in a Revolutionary Age 24 Lois Dubin Jewish Courtship and Marriage in 1920s Vienna 26 Marsha Rozenblit Marriage Equality: An American Jewish View 32 Joyce Antler The Playwright, the Starlight, and the Rabbi: A Love Triangle 35 Lila Corwin Berman The Hand that Rocks the Cradle: How the Gender of the Jewish Parent Influences Intermarriage 42 Keren McGinity Critiquing and Rethinking Kiddushin 44 Rachel Adler Kiddushin, Marriage, and Egalitarian Relationships: Making New Legal Meanings 46 Gail Labovitz Beyond the Sanctification of Subordination: Reclaiming Tradition and Equality in Jewish Marriage 50 Melanie Landau The Multifarious
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSGENDER JEWS and HALAKHAH1 Rabbi Leonard A
    TRANSGENDER JEWS AND HALAKHAH1 Rabbi Leonard A. Sharzer MD This teshuvah was adopted by the CJLS on June 7, 2017, by a vote of 11 in favor, 8 abstaining. Members voting in favor: Rabbis Aaron Alexander, Pamela Barmash, Elliot Dorff, Susan Grossman, Reuven Hammer, Jan Kaufman, Gail Labovitz, Amy Levin, Daniel Nevins, Avram Reisner, and Iscah Waldman. Members abstaining: Rabbis Noah Bickart, Baruch Frydman- Kohl, Joshua Heller, David Hoffman, Jeremy Kalmanofsky, Jonathan Lubliner, Micah Peltz, and Paul Plotkin. שאלות 1. What are the appropriate rituals for conversion to Judaism of transgender individuals? 2. What are the appropriate rituals for solemnizing a marriage in which one or both parties are transgender? 3. How is the marriage of a transgender person (which was entered into before transition) to be dissolved (after transition). 4. Are there any requirements for continuing a marriage entered into before transition after one of the partners transitions? 5. Are hormonal therapy and gender confirming surgery permissible for people with gender dysphoria? 6. Are trans men permitted to become pregnant? 7. How must healthcare professionals interact with transgender people? 8. Who should prepare the body of a transgender person for burial? 9. Are preoperative2 trans men obligated for tohorat ha-mishpahah? 10. Are preoperative trans women obligated for brit milah? 11. At what point in the process of transition is the person recognized as the new gender? 12. Is a ritual necessary to effect the transition of a trans person? The Committee on Jewish Law and Standards of the Rabbinical Assembly provides guidance in matters of halkhhah for the Conservative movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Toledot Yeshu After the Affective Turn Sarit Kattan Gribetz, Fordham University
    EARLY MODERN WORKSHOP: Jewish History Resources Volume 13: History of Emotions/Emotions in History, Fordham University, New York, August 23- 24, 2016 “When Miriam heard Rabbi Shimon ben Shetah’s words she became very scared”: Emotions in the Conception Narrative of a Judaeo-Arabic Version of Toledot Yeshu Sarit Kattan Gribetz, Fordham University Introduction In 826 C.E., Agobard, bishop of Lyon, published a treatise entitled De Judaicis superstitionibus, detailing and ridiculing the ‘superstitions’ of the Jews. Within his missive, Agobard describes the tales that the Jews tell about Jesus. The details Agobard recounts make clear that the bishop is referring to a medieval Jewish parody of the story of Jesus’ life, known as Toledot Yeshu (Life of Jesus), composed in Aramaic sometime before the second half of the eighth century and later translated into Hebrew. Agobard’s successor, Amulo, also quotes Toledot Yeshu in his theological treatise of 846, Contra Iudaeos, and the Catalan Dominican Ramón Martí cites long passages of Toledot Yeshu in Latin and Hebrew in his anti-Jewish polemic Pugio fidei in 1278. The inquisitorial dossier of a Jewish convert named Pere in the fourteenth-century Crown of Aragon recounts another version of the text along with vivid descriptions of how this story of Jesus’ life was told in the kitchen of a Jewish home in the Aragonese village of La Almunia de Doña Godina to try to re-Judaize the recent apostate. The text of Toledot Yeshu is found in a seventeenth-century prayer book from Yemen, and, in addition to Aramaic and Hebrew, manuscripts of the text are preserved in Judaeo-Arabic, Judaeo-Persian, Ladino, Yiddish, and other languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Critiques of Rabbinic Law Through the Lens of Assisted Reproductive Technologies Andrea Pemberton
    The ART of Producing Responsa: Feminist Critiques of Rabbinic Law through the Lens of Assisted Reproductive Technologies Andrea Pemberton Prior to the mid-twentieth century, when assisted reproductive technologies (ART) stepped on to the medical scene, supplications and prayers to God were the primary means for religious Jewish couples to cope with the issue of infertility. However, with the advent of artificial insemination techniques, fertility hormones, in vitro fertilization, and surrogacy, new medical technologies have successfully generated proactive methods for infertile individuals to have biological children of their own. Yet as these controversial technologies emerge, and prove to be of interest and use to Jewish persons, rabbis are compelled to contend with this new and challenging issue. In an effort to comply with halakha, or rabbinic law, modern rabbis have interpreted ART in various ways, putting restrictions on certain forms and implementing guidelines for their use in general. For religious Orthodox Jews, halakha is a prominent feature of everyday life that influences his or her actions and interactions in the most direct way. Because of this observance, Orthodox couples undergoing fertility treatment and utilizing ART take seriously the guidance of their rabbis, who are seen as authorities on halakha. Consequently, a potential problem that emerges from the halakhic discourse on assisted reproductive technologies is that this set of symbolically-loaded medical procedures takes place within the female body, yet is dictated by the tractates of a male-dominated religious legal system. The purpose of this paper, then, is to utilize feminist critiques of gender bias in legal systems to critically analyze Orthodox rabbinic discourse on assisted reproductive technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEWS May/June 2019 Volume IX, No
    Association of Jewish Libraries REVIEWS May/June 2019 Volume IX, No. 2 Reviews of Titles for Children and Teens EDITED BY RACHEL KAMIN & CHAVA PINCHUCK In The Spotlight Folman, Ari. Anne Frank’s Diary: The Graphic Adaptation. Illus. by David Polonsky. New York: Pantheon Books, 2018. 149 pp. $14.95. (9781101871799) Gr. 8-12. To illustrate every word in Anne Frank’s Diary of a Young Girl would have taken years upon years and thousands of pages. Instead Folman and Polonsky abridged the renowned diary into an utterly gorgeous graphic novel. Folman manages to cover all the main events and feelings in Frank’s diary such as the hardships of living in the annex, but also discovering love and questioning the world. Polonsky, a graduate of the Bezalel Academy of Art and Design, had created illustrations that enhance the text beautifully. These lush images help to tell the story as much as the text does. He and Folman are best known for the award-winning animated documentary Waltz with Bashir (2008) about the 1982 Lebanon War, and are currently producing a movie version of the graphic adaptation, Where Is Anne Frank? Although it does not replace the original text, this graphic novel reflects it well, converting the thoughts Anne shared with Kitty (her diary) into conversations and using actual photographs of the residents of The Secret Annex CONTENTS Titles for Children & Teens p. 1 Holocaust and World War II p. 15 50 Years of the Sydney Taylor Award p. 1 Israel p. 18 Spotlight p. 4 Jewish Life & Values p.
    [Show full text]
  • Ella Phd October 24, 2017
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ WORDS, WIGS AND VEILS MODEST RELIGIOUS DRESS AND GENDERED ONLINE IDENTITIES Fitzsimmons, Eleonora Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 30. Sep. 2021 WORDS, WIGS AND VEILS: MODEST RELIGIOUS DRESS AND GENDERED ONLINE IDENTITIES Eleonora Fitzsimmons Theology and Religious Studies King's College London, University of London Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Religious Studies, September 2016 !1 Abstract Words, Wigs and Veils: Modest Religious Dress and Gendered Online Identities In this thesis, I explore how Muslim and Jewish women in a predominantly North American cultural context use online public spaces to blog about their religious dress practices.
    [Show full text]
  • THE AGUNAH CRISIS: an ANALYSIS of SOME PROPOSED SYSTEMIC SOLUTIONS (From a Series in Progress)
    THE AGUNAH CRISIS: AN ANALYSIS OF SOME PROPOSED SYSTEMIC SOLUTIONS (from a series in progress) I I was honored to be a participant in the Tikvah/JOFA Agunah Summit. The experience caused me much and ongoing rethinking. That rethinking was certainly a goal of the summit, and much has been written optimistically about other outcomes. But I also felt that much of what was said and happened at the Summit evidenced deep confusion about the nature of the challenge and about the ways in which proposed solutions would work in practice, and that this confusion often made it difficult even to have serious conversations, let alone to agree on action steps. I am accordingly starting a series of articles intended to describe the agunah issue as clearly as possible, in the hope that this will enable new collaborations and creativity. I. Who is an Agunah? A) The “Classic” Agunah: Definition and History of Four Categories a. Definition: In popular discourse, the classic agunah is a woman whose husband has disappeared and may or may not be dead. The Rabbis relaxed their usual evidentiary standards and allowed her to remarry on the basis of normally invalid testimony or circumstantial evidence of death. However, fearing fraud, they also imposed severe penalties if the husband eventually turned up alive. History: Thousands and thousands of responsa through the centuries address cases of disappeared husbands. These responsa generally reflect the commonsense understanding of the Talmud, namely that formal rules of evidence should not prevent a widow from remarrying, but that remarriage should be permitted only when the husband’s death can genuinely be seen as proven.
    [Show full text]
  • Apocrypha and Toledot Yeshu in Medieval Europe
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Theology & Religious Studies College of Arts and Sciences 3-2020 Infancy Stories of Jesus: Apocrypha and Toledot Yeshu in Medieval Europe Natalie Latteri Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/thrs Part of the Christianity Commons, Cultural History Commons, History of Religion Commons, Jewish Studies Commons, and the Social History Commons Infancy Stories of Jesus: Apocrypha and Toledot Yeshu in Medieval Europe Natalie E. Latteri* Stories of Jesus have circulated among Christians since the first century of the Common Era. Such lore functioned to provide early Christians who were eager to learn about their savior with information about his conception, life, death, and resurrection. Some made it into the canonical New Testament Gospel accounts but much of it, for one reason or another, did not. Even so, versions of many of the stories remained popular among Christians throughout the centuries and continued to supplement the biblical text while addressing the concerns of story tellers and their audience. For purposes of this paper, the entirety of these extra-canonical Christian texts is referred to simply as apocrypha. Like the canonical Gospel accounts and later hagiography, or (semi) fictional accounts of saints’ lives, apocryphal stories of Jesus also offered entertainment and a type of model behavior for readers and listeners to emulate.1 * Natalie E. Latteri earned her PhD in History from the University of New Mexico. She teaches Jewish-Christian Relations at the University of San Francisco in the Swig Program in Jewish Studies and Social Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Modified Mamzer in Early Rabbinic Texts
    CHAPTER TWO THE CASE OF THE MODIFIED MAMZER IN EARLY RABBINIC TEXTS Throughout cultural history the illegitimate child has been a source of concern to societies. In accordance with its needs, each society defined the illegitimate child or bastard; in most cases the illegiti- mate offspring was stigmatized. In fact, the word “bastard,” which embodies this concept of the stigmatized individual, comes from the old French ba(s)t, translated as “baggage.” Though it is unclear why an illegitimate child is called “baggage,” various explanations sug- gest that this may represent the father’s short stay in town, or the mother’s “baggage” or burden. Anthropologists define illegitimacy as a child whose conception and birth do not conform to the institutional rules governing repro- duction in the community to which its parents belong.1 In most west- ern societies the basic conceptual distinction between legitimacy and illegitimacy is an outcome of the institution of marriage. Sociologists also understand the phenomenon of stigmatization of the bastard as demonstrating the need for society to control the purity of the group. The question of who is recognized from birth as legitimate has significant economic ramifications, for example, (in tribe or clan sit- uations), inheritance and food distribution. In other words, the idea of illegitimacy is bound up with concepts of property, inheritance, domicile, lineage, naming, marriage portion and dowries.2 This is especially relevant in patriarchal societies (cf. the Jewish tradition). In addition, when society or religion place strong emphasis on the importance of family structure, any deviant activity threatening this unit is discouraged.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BETH DIN: Jewish Law in the UK
    THE BETH DIN: Jewish Law in the UK The Centre for Social Cohesion THE BETH DIN JEWISH COURTS IN THE UK The Centre for Social Cohesion Clutha House 10 Storey’s Gate London SW1P 3AY Tel: +44 (0)20 7222 8909 Fax: +44 (0)5 601527476 Email: [email protected] www.socialcohesion.co.uk The Centre for Social Cohesion Limited by guarantee. Registered in England and Wales: No. 06609071 2009 THE CENTRE FOR SOCIAL COHESION Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 3 Background 4 THE BETH DIN AND THE ARBITRATION ACT (1996) 6 Rules applicable to Arbitration tribunals 7 Arbitration awards 8 Safeguards under the Arbitration Act – 9 Consent Impartiality Enforcement by civil courts Remit of arbitration tribunals Recognition of religious courts 12 THE BETH DIN AS A RELIGIOUS AUTHORITY 13 Religious functions of the Beth Din 13 The Beth Din, Divorce and Family Law – 13 Divorce The Divorce (Religious Marriages) Act 2002 Mediation INTERPRETATIONS OF JEWISH LAW IN THE UK 18 Positions on key issues – 18 Divorce Conversion Jewish status Conclusion 21 Glossary 22 THE BETH DIN: JEWISH LAW IN THE UK 1 Executive Summary What is the Beth Din and what does it do? The Beth Din is a Jewish authority which offers members of the Jewish communities two separate services – civil arbitration and religious rulings. The Beth Din provides civil arbitration as an alternative to court action under the Arbitration Act (1996), which grants all British citizens the right to resolve civil disputes through arbitration. They also provide religious rulings on personal issues of faith which are voluntary, non-binding and limited to an individual‘s private status.
    [Show full text]
  • A PRIMER on JEWISH DIVORCE a Guide for the Jewish Communal Professional
    A PRIMER ON JEWISH DIVORCE A Guide for the Jewish Communal Professional IRVING A. BREITOWITZ Associate Professor of Law at the University of Maryland, Rabbinics Professor in the College of Jewish Studies Cooperative Graduate Program with George Washington University, and Rabbi of the Woodside Synagogue, Silver Spring, Maryland This article presents some basic information about the halacha of the divorce process with which Jewish communal professionals should be familiar. It describes the Get, the problems of the mamzer and the agunah, and the bet din process. istorically, divorce within the tradition­ discussion, some of this information is quite Hally close-knit and cohesive Jewish important even to Jewish clients who may family, particularly one that adhered to not normally adhere to halacha. Because halacha (Jewish law), was rare. Although women are most often affected by many of the Torah itself recognizes the possibihty of these requirements, this article assumes a divorce, it was an option that was rarely female client. employed and indeed was societally discour­ aged. This is no longer the case. Although THE GET: WHAT IS IT? the divorce rate among the most traditional­ ist segment of Jewry, the Orthodox, is still To dissolve a marriage under Jewish law, a well below that of the general popidation, it husband must present to his wife a specially is on the rise. To some extent, this is a sad prepared document known as a Get. Get is reflection of the "throw away" mentality an Aramaic term meaning "document." that pervades and afflicts all of American Although the term "Get" can be, and occa­ society—if it doesn't "pay" to fix a phone, sionally is, employed in reference to any le­ it doesn't pay to "fix" a marriage.
    [Show full text]