Shorter Versus Longer Durations of Exclusive Human Milk Feeding and Diabetes Outcomes in Offspring: a Systematic Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
United States Department of Agriculture Shorter Versus Longer Durations of Exclusive Human Milk Feeding and Diabetes Outcomes in Offspring: A Systematic Review The Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project Published date: April 15, 2019 Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion Food and Nutrition Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 3101 Park Center Drive Alexandria, Virginia This systematic review was conducted for the Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project (P/B-24 Project) by the Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review (NESR) team at the Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, Food and Nutrition Service, USDA. All systematic reviews from the P/B-24 Project are available on the NESR website: https://nesr.usda.gov. Conclusion statements drawn as part of this systematic review describe the state of science related to the specific question examined. Conclusion statements do not draw implications, and should not be interpreted as dietary guidance. The contents of this document may be used and reprinted without permission. Endorsements by NESR, the Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, the Food and Nutrition Service, or the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) of derivative products developed from this work may not be stated or implied. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and USDA civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632- 9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Suggested citation for this systematic review: Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review Team and Infant Milk-Feeding Practices Technical Expert Collaborative. Shorter Versus Longer Durations of Exclusive Human Milk Feeding and Diabetes Outcomes in Offspring: A Systematic Review. Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, April 2019. Available at: https://nesr.usda.gov/project-specific-overview-pb-24-0 This systematic review has also been published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition: Güngör D, Nadaud P, LaPergola CC, Dreibelbis C, Wong YP, Terry N, et al. Infant milk-feeding practices and diabetes outcomes in offspring: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109(7):817S–37S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy311. Related citations are published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition: P/B-24 Project overview: Stoody EE, Spahn JM, Casavale KO. The Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project: a series of systematic reviews on diet and health. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109(7):685S–97S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy372. P/B-24 systematic review methodology: Obbagy JE, Spahn JM, Wong YP, Psota TL, Spill MK, Dreibelbis C, et al. Systematic review methodology used in the Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109(7):698S–704S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy226. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Infant milk-feeding practices Technical Expert Collaborative (TEC): Steve A. Abrams, MD, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin Sue Anderson, PhD, US Food and Drug Administration (06/2015-12/2015) Leila Beker, PhD, RD, contractor for US Food and Drug Administration Kirsi M Järvinen, MD, PhD, University of Rochester Medical Center Laurie A. Nommsen-Rivers, PhD, RD, IBCLC, University of Cincinnati College of Allied Health Sciences (starting 09/2015) Kimberly O. O’Brien, PhD, Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University Emily Oken, MD, MPH, Division of Chronic Disease Research Across the Lifecourse, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health Rafael Pérez-Escamilla, PhD, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health Ekhard E. Ziegler, MD, Department of Pediatrics, The University of Iowa Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review (NESR) team: Darcy Güngör1, MS, Panum Group, Lead analyst Perrine Nadaud1, PhD, Panum Group, Analyst Carol Dreibelbis1, MPH, Panum Group, Analyst (starting 01/2016) Concetta LaPergola1, MS, Panum Group, Analyst (starting 11/2016) Nancy Terry, MLS, NIH, Librarian Yat Ping Wong, MLS, MPH, USDA, Librarian Project lead: Joanne Spahn, MS, USDA Federal Expert Group (FEG)-Technical Expert Collaborative (TEC) liaisons: Leila Beker, PhD, RD, US Food and Drug Administration (6/2015-4/2016) Tova Jacobovits, MS, RD, US Food and Drug Administration (starting 4/2016) SAA, SA, LB, KMJ, LAN-R, KOO’B, EO, RP-E, EEZ, DG, PN, and JS participated in establishing the research questions, analytic framework, and study inclusion and exclusion criteria. YPW and NT developed the literature search strategy and conducted the literature search. PN, CD, and DG screened search results and identified studies for inclusion. DG, PN, and CL extracted data and assessed risk of bias for included studies. SAA, LB, TJ, KMJ, LAN-R, KOO’B, EO, RP-E, and EEZ reviewed and provided substantive feedback on all systematic review materials, including the synthesis of the body of evidence, conclusion statement, and grade of the strength of the evidence. DG and PN prepared this report and JMS provided oversight. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final report. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. We thank Katherine Kortsmit and Kelly Mannherz for their assistance with extracting data and assessing risk of bias for included studies. Funding source: United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, Alexandria, VA 1 Under contract with the Food and Nutrition Service, United States Department of Agriculture. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... 3 Table of contents .................................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 5 What is the relationship between shorter versus longer durations of exclusive human milk feeding and diabetes outcomes in offspring? ........................................................................................................... 7 Plain language summary ................................................................................................................... 7 Technical abstract ............................................................................................................................. 9 Full review ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Systematic review question ......................................................................................................... 11 Conclusion statement .................................................................................................................. 11 Grade ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Description of the evidence .......................................................................................................... 12 Evidence synthesis ...................................................................................................................... 13 Research recommendations ........................................................................................................ 23 Included articles ..........................................................................................................................