1 Cultural & Social Affairs Department Oic
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Title: Never Forget: Ground Zero, Park51, and Constitutive Rhetorics
Title: Never Forget: Ground Zero, Park51, and Constitutive Rhetorics Author: Tamara Issak Issue: 3 Publication Date: November 2020 Stable URL: http://constell8cr.com/issue-3/never-forget-ground-zero-park51-and-constitutive-rh etorics/ constellations a cultural rhetorics publishing space Never Forget: Ground Zero, Park51, and Constitutive Rhetorics Tamara Issak, St. John’s University Introduction It was the summer of 2010 when the story of Park51 exploded in the news. Day after day, media coverage focused on the proposal to create a center for Muslim and interfaith worship and recreational activities in Lower Manhattan. The space envisioned for Park51 was a vacant department store which was damaged on September 11, 2001. Eventually, it was sold to Sharif El-Gamal, a Manhattan realtor and developer, in July of 2009. El-Gamal intended to use this space to build a community center open to the general public, which would feature a performing arts center, swimming pool, fitness center, basketball court, an auditorium, a childcare center, and many other amenities along with a Muslim prayer space/mosque. Despite the approval for construction by a Manhattan community board, the site became a battleground and the project was hotly debated. It has been over ten years since the uproar over Park51, and it is important to revisit the event as it has continued significance and impact today. The main argument against the construction of the community center and mosque was its proximity to Ground Zero. Opponents to Park51 argued that the construction of a mosque so close to Ground Zero was offensive and insensitive because the 9/11 attackers were associated with Islam (see fig. -
Stephen Abraham, Lieutenant Colonel (Ret
As of June 24, 2010 Stephen Abraham , Lieutenant Colonel (Ret.), U.S. Army Intelligence Corps (Reserves); Lawyer, Newport Beach, California Morton Abramowitz , Senior Fellow, The Century Foundation; former President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; Ambassador to Turkey, 1989-1991, Thailand, 1978- 1981 and to the Mutual and Balanced Force Reduction Negotiations in Vienna, 1983- 1984; former Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research; former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Inter-American, East Asian, and Pacific affairs; former Special Assistant to the Secretary of Defense and to the Deputy Secretary of State; former political adviser to the Commander-in-Chief, Pacific Azizah al-Hibri , Professor, The T.C. Williams School of Law, University of Richmond; President, Karamah: Muslim Women Lawyers for Human Rights Dennis Archer , President, American Bar Association, 2003-2004; Mayor, Detroit, 1994- 2001; Associate Justice, Michigan Supreme Court, 1986-1990 J. Brian Atwood , Dean, Humphrey Institute; former Administrator, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID); head of transition team, State Department; former Under Secretary of State for Management; former Adjunct Lecturer at Harvard's JFK School; former Sol M. Linowitz Professor for International Affairs, Hamilton College; Director, Citizens International Lourdes G. Baird , Judge, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, 1992- 2005, Los Angeles Superior Court, 1988-1990, Los Angeles Municipal Court, 1987-1988, and Municipal Court, East Los Angeles Judicial District, 1986-1987; U.S. Attorney, Central District of California, 1990-1992; Assistant U.S. Attorney, Central District of California, 1977-1983 Doug Bandow , former Special Assistant to President Ronald Reagan William Banks , Professor, Director, the Institute for National Security and Counterterrorism; Laura J. -
Discussion and Study Guide in OUR SON’S NAME a Film by Gayla Jamison
Discussion and Study Guide IN OUR SON’S NAME A Film by Gayla Jamison Forgiveness means recognizing the full humanity of the other person. It also means letting go of something that can be self-destructive. How to This discussion and study guide is intended to accompany the documentary Use This film In Our Son’s Name when used by community groups, schools, churches, synagogues, mosques, and prisons. It includes suggestions on how to use Guide this guide, a statement from director Gayla Jamison, and a synopsis. Also included are a chronological timeline of events depicted in the film, a list of people who appear in the film with their photos, and a brief explanation of the death penalty trial process. The film inspires lively discussions by audiences wherever it’s shown. Many of the discussion questions included here are ones sparked by early screen- ings. Discussion questions are organized in two parts, as questions relating to specific scenes and questions pertaining to the film as a whole. Questions about specific scenes follow a brief description of the scene and are accom- panied by a representative still photo from that scene. The questions cover a variety of topics. Discussion leaders are encouraged to review the questions and select ones suited to their particular group and/or the direction they would like the discussion to take. Audiences have especially been moved by the prison sequences in the film. A version of how to implement the Peace Circle exercise that is seen in the prison sequences is included here. That section also includes Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Circle Process, a brief explanation of the concept of restorative justice, and excerpts from letters from two of the Sing Sing prisoners who participated in the Circle Process shown in the film. -
Donald Trump, the Changes: Aanti
Ethnic and Racial Studies ISSN: 0141-9870 (Print) 1466-4356 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rers20 Donald Trump, the anti-Muslim far right and the new conservative revolution Ed Pertwee To cite this article: Ed Pertwee (2020): Donald Trump, the anti-Muslim far right and the new conservative revolution, Ethnic and Racial Studies, DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2020.1749688 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2020.1749688 © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 17 Apr 2020. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 193 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rers20 ETHNIC AND RACIAL STUDIES https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2020.1749688 Donald Trump, the anti-Muslim far right and the new conservative revolution Ed Pertwee Department of Sociology, London School of Economics, London, UK ABSTRACT This article explores the “counter-jihad”, a transnational field of anti-Muslim political action that emerged in the mid-2000s, becoming a key tributary of the recent far- right insurgency and an important influence on the Trump presidency. The article draws on thematic analysis of content from counter-jihad websites and interviews with movement activists, sympathizers and opponents, in order to characterize the counter-jihad’s organizational infrastructure and political discourse and to theorize its relationship to fascism and other far-right tendencies. Although the political discourses of the counter-jihad, Trumpian Republicanism and the avowedly racist “Alt-Right” are not identical, I argue that all three tendencies share a common, counterrevolutionary temporal structure. -
Loud Proud Passion and Politics in the English Defence League Makes Us Confront the Complexities of Anti-Islamist/Anti-Muslim Fervor
New Ethnographies ‘These voices of English nationalism make for difficult listening. The great strength of Hilary PILKINGTON Pilkington’s unflinching ethnography is her capacity to confound and challenge our political and preconceptions and makes us think harder. This is an important, difficult and brave book.’ Les Back, Professor of Sociology, Goldsmiths, University of London ‘Pilkington offers fresh and crucial insights into the politics of fear. Her unflinchingly honest depiction of the EDL breaks apart stereotypes of rightist activists as simply dupes, thugs, and racists and Loud proud PASSION AND POLITICS IN THE ENGLISH DEFENCE LEAGUE makes us confront the complexities of anti-Islamist/anti-Muslim fervor. This terrific, compelling book is a must-read for scholars and readers concerned about the global rise of populist movements on the right.’ Kathleen Blee, Distinguished Professor of Sociology, University of Pittsburgh Loud and proud uses interviews, informal conversations and extended observation at English Defence League events to critically reflect on the gap between the movement’s public image and activists’ own understandings of it. It details how activists construct the EDL and themselves as ‘not racist, not violent, just no longer silent’ through, among other things, the exclusion of Muslims as a possible object of racism on the grounds that they are a religiously not racially defined Loud group. In contrast, activists perceive themselves to be ‘second-class citizens’, disadvantaged and discriminated against by a two-tier justice system that privileges the rights of others. This failure to recognise themselves as a privileged white majority explains why ostensibly intimidating EDL street demonstrations marked by racist chanting and nationalistic flag waving are understood by activists as standing ‘loud and proud’; the only way of being heard in a political system governed by a politics of silencing. -
Writing the 9/11 Decade
1 Writing the 9/11 Decade Charlie Lee-Potter A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of PhD ROYAL HOLLOWAY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 2 Declaration of Authorship I Charlie Lee-Potter hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ______________________ Date: ________________________ 3 Charlie Lee-Potter, Writing the 9/11 Decade Novelists have struggled to find forms of expression that would allow them to register the post-9/11 landscape. This thesis examines their tentative and sometimes faltering attempts to establish a critical distance from and create a convincing narrative and metaphorical lexicon for the historical, political and psychological realities of the terrorist attacks. I suggest that they have, at times, been distracted by the populist rhetoric of journalistic expression, by a retreat to American exceptionalism and by the demand for an immediate response. The Bush administration’s statement that the state and politicians ‘create our own reality’ served to reinforce the difficulties that novelists faced in creating their own. Against the background of public commentary post-9/11, and the politics of the subsequent ‘War on Terror’, the thesis considers the work of Richard Ford, Paul Auster, Kamila Shamsie, Nadeem Aslam, Don DeLillo, Mohsin Hamid and Amy Waldman. Using my own extended interviews with Ford, Waldman and Shamsie, the artist Eric Fischl, the journalist Kevin Marsh, and with the former Archbishop of Canterbury Dr. Rowan Williams (who is also a 9/11 survivor), I consider the aims and praxis of novelists working within a variety of traditions, from Ford’s realism and Auster’s metafiction to the post- colonial perspectives of Hamid and Aslam, and, finally, the end-of-decade reflections of Waldman. -
Hate Speech Bans, Democracy, and Political Legitimacy James Weinstein
University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Constitutional Commentary 2017 Hate Speech Bans, Democracy, and Political Legitimacy James Weinstein Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Weinstein, James, "Hate Speech Bans, Democracy, and Political Legitimacy" (2017). Constitutional Commentary. 465. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm/465 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Constitutional Commentary collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 - WEINSTEIN INTRO.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 9/29/17 4:41 PM HATE SPEECH BANS, DEMOCRACY, AND POLITICAL LEGITIMACY James Weinstein* Laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion, sex, or sexual orientation are an essential means by which modern liberal democracies promote equality and protect human dignity. Consistent with these laudable goals, most liberal democracies, with the notable exception of the United States, also prohibit hate speech, including expression that demeans people based on characteristics protected by antidiscrimination laws. Ironically, however, hate speech restrictions can undermine the legitimacy of antidiscrimination laws, both in terms of their popular acceptance but even more crucially with respect to the morality of their enforcement. For instance, -
Islamophobia.Pdf
From Radical-Right Islamophobia to ‘Cumulative Extremism’ Matthew Feldman1 An important development in radical right activism this century – albeit sharing many similarities with demonised communities in the past – is, without doubt, the turn toward anti-Muslim politics. In the aftermath of mass-casualty terrorist attacks by Islamist militants attacks in the US on 11 September 2001; Madrid on 11 March 2004; and the UK on 7 July 2005, the emergence of a potent anti-Muslim politics has offered a crucial hook for a new generation of radical right politicians to hang an extremist agenda – one palpable in some sections of the mainstream media and wider public. In focussing upon the British case, a good example to start with is from the British National Party’s (hereafter BNP) current chairman Nick Griffin. In a lecture directed to the ‘backstage’ of the movement in 2005, he urged activists to turn away from an unhelpful anti- Semitism and embrace anti-Muslim politics in an attempt at populist, electoral- friendly campaigning: […] in real politics in the real world, one’s proper choice of enemy is a group who you gain a worthwhile level of extra support by identifying, who you have a realistic chance of beating, and whose defeat will take you the furthest towards your goal. With millions of our people desperately and very reasonably worried by the spread of Islam and its adherents, and with the mass media ... playing ‘Islamophobic’ messages like a scratched CD, the proper choice of enemy needn’t be left to rocket scientists.2 Griffin was trying to distance the BNP from much of its earlier rhetoric, echoing the anti-Semitism between the wars, so closely identified with ‘classical’ fascist movements like Nazism or the Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists. -
Overview of the Far Right
Overview of the Far-Right Dr Benjamin Lee Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats (CREST) Lancaster University, UK This work was funded by the Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats (CREST). CREST is commissioned by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC Award: ES/N009614/1) with funding from the UK Intelligence Community. 1 Introduction This paper considers the ‘far-right’, an overarching term that includes a range of ideologies encompassing both the radical right (democratic) and extreme right (anti- democratic) (Ravndal & Bjørgo 2018). The defining characteristic of the far-right for this paper is: A narrative of racial and/or cultural threat to a ‘native’ group arising from perceived alien groups within a society. This is considered a working definition intended to bound this paper only, this should not be treated as comprehensive.1 This paper focuses on the far-right in the United Kingdom. However, far-right activism is transnational, and so it has not been possible to limit this research exclusively to the UK, nor can the UK far-right be considered in isolation from the wider far-right (Zúquete 2015). The far-right is not composed only of discrete and easily identifiable groups. While various organisations are components of the far-right, including gangs, protest movements, pressure groups, and political parties, the far-right as a whole is amorphous. Its messiness is inherent, stemming from a diverse range of ideologies and narratives enacted over a wide range of geographic contexts by multiple actors. Adding to this, digital technology has allowed an already complex patchwork of groups, influencers and activists to diffuse further through multiple and sometimes overlapping presences on an array of digital platforms. -
The English Defence League and Europe's Counter-Jihad Movement
A Neo-Nationalist Network: The English Defence League and Europe’s Counter-Jihad Movement Alexander Meleagrou-Hitchens Hans Brun In partnership with the Swedish National Defence College and the Centre for Asymmetric Threat Studies (CATS) AUTHOR’S NOTE This report contains quotes from audio lectures as well as online forums and blogs. All of these have been reproduced in their original syntax, including all spelling and grammatical errors. ABOUT ICSR The International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence (ICSR) is a unique partnership in which King’s College London, Georgetown Univesity, the University of Pennsylvania, the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya (Israel) and the Regional Center for Conflict Prevention Amman (Jordan) are equal stakeholders. The aim and mission of ICSR is to bring together knowledge and leadership to counter the growth of radicalisation and political violence. For more information, please visit www.icsr.info Contact detaiLS For questions, queries and additional copies of this report, please contact: ICSR King’s College London 138 –142 Strand London WC2R 1HH United Kingdom T. + 44 (0)20 7848 2065 F. + 44 (0)20 7848 2748 E. [email protected] Like all other ICSR publications, this report can be downloaded free of charge from the ICSR website at www.icsr.info. © ICSR 2013 A Neo-Nationalist Network The English Defence League and Europe’s Counter-Jihad Movement Executive Summary A New European Movement The English Defence League (EDL) and its allies in Europe, henceforth referred to collectively as the European Counter-Jihad Movement (ECJM), constitute an identifiable pan-European far-right movement that has been emerging since the late-2000s. -
Friedrichs Plaintiffs Change of Plan CUNY's
NEW! ● Change of plan WF prescription provider replaced larıon PAGE 8 CNEWSPAPER OF THE PROFESSIONAL STAFF CONGRESS / CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK DECEMBER 2015 Erik McGregor Erik PSC POWER GROWS WE SHALL NOT BE MOVED In its fight for a fair contract, PSC is ratcheting up the pressure with a series disorderly conduct. Plans for the action resulted in contract offer from CUNY of escalating tactics. In the scene above, members engaged in a planned civil management – one described as ‘unacceptable’ by PSC President Barbara disobedience action on November 4, blocking the entrance to CUNY head- Bowen. On November 19, members packed The Great Hall at the Cooper quarters in Midtown, risking arrest. Fifty-three members were charged with Union to begin preparations for a strike authorization vote. PAGES 3 & 6 FIGHT FOR $15 CHURCH & STATE DETERMINATION POWER & ART CUNY’s low- Friedrichs Ready for Irony meets wage workers plaintiffs action idealism The University employs Pressing the anti-union Su- At a union-wide meeting, 900 PSC member and MacAr- 7,000 workers at less than preme Court case is a little- PSC members gathered to thur Fellow Ben Lerner talks the rate set by activists known group that seeks to prepare for a strike autho- to Clarion about the rela- calling for a raise in the bring religion into public rization vote – the next big tionship between poetry and minimum wage. Read schools, making missionar- step in the union’s campaign politics, and the beauty of their stories. PAGE 5 ies of teachers. PAGE 9 for a fair contract. PAGE 3 imperfect collectivity. PAGE 12 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS ● AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ● NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ● NYC CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL ● NYS AFL-CIO ● NEW YORK STATE UNITED TEACHERS 2 NEWS & LETTERS Clarion | December 2015 IN BRIEF LETTERS TO THE EDITOR | WRITE TO: CLARION/PSC, 61 BROADWAY, 15TH FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10006. -
Committed to Memory: Remembering "9/11" As a Crisis of Education
REMEMBERING “9/11” AS A CRISIS OF EDUCATION COMMITTED TO MEMORY: REMEMBERING “9/11” AS A CRISIS OF EDUCATION By KAREN ESPIRITU, B.A., M.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University © Copyright by Karen Espiritu, December 2013 Ph.D. Thesis – K. Espiritu; McMaster University – English and Cultural Studies McMaster University DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2013) Hamilton, Ontario (English & Cultural Studies) TITLE: Committed to Memory: Remembering “9/11” As a Crisis of Education AUTHOR: Karen Espiritu, B.A., M.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Dr. Amber Dean NUMBER OF PAGES: ix, 246 ii Ph.D. Thesis – K. Espiritu; McMaster University – English and Cultural Studies ABSTRACT This study considers the pedagogical significance of mourning and remembrance in the context of the commemorative culture surrounding the “9/11” attacks on America, which have stimulated recent explorations of what it might mean to commit to ethical remembrances of the dead. Critical of “9/11” memorial discourses that provide justifications for heightened “homeland” security and military mobilization in the “War on Terror,” this project not only addresses the educative force of memorial-artistic responses in creating meaning out of mass deaths, but also dissociates the concept of the public memorial as foremost an apparatus of the state, private corporations, and other institutions which seek to use memorials towards amnesiac or ideological objectives. Analyses of the memorial responses addressed in this project unpack how particular modes of remembering “9/11” and its victims are themselves reflections upon the meanings and objectives of collective remembrance.