DOCSLIB.ORG

Bound Volume)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bound Volume) Job: 536BV$ Take: SPN1 12-19-03 20:11:09 The dashed line indicates the top edge of the book. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UNITED STATES REPORTS 536 OCT. TERM 2001 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The dashed line indicates the bottom edge of the book. This camera copy was created for books with spines up to 31⁄4Љ wide. For smaller books, it must be centered on the spine and trimmed left and right as needed. 536BV$TITL 12-19-03 20:18:47 UNITED STATES REPORTS VOLUME 536 CASES ADJUDGED IN THE SUPREME COURT AT OCTOBER TERM, 2001 June 10 Through October 3, 2002 End of Term FRANK D. WAGNER reporter of decisions WASHINGTON : 2004 Printed on Uncoated Permanent Printing Paper For sale by the U. S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328 536BV$ Unit: UIII [12-19-03 20:26:26] PGT: FRTBX Ⅵ JUSTICES of the SUPREME COURT during the time of these reports WILLIAM H. REHNQUIST, Chief Justice. JOHN PAUL STEVENS, Associate Justice. SANDRA DAY O’CONNOR, Associate Justice. ANTONIN SCALIA, Associate Justice. ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, Associate Justice. DAVID H. SOUTER, Associate Justice. CLARENCE THOMAS, Associate Justice. RUTH BADER GINSBURG, Associate Justice. STEPHEN BREYER, Associate Justice. officers of the court JOHN D. ASHCROFT, Attorney General. THEODORE B. OLSON, Solicitor General. WILLIAM K. SUTER, Clerk. FRANK D. WAGNER, Reporter of Decisions. PAMELA TALKIN, Marshal. SHELLEY L. DOWLING, Librarian. iii 536BV$ Unit: $UIV [12-19-03 20:29:59] PGT: FRTBX Ⅵ SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Allotment of Justices It is ordered that the following allotment be made of the Chief Justice and Associate Justices of this Court among the circuits, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 42, and that such allotment be entered of record, effective September 30, 1994, viz.: For the District of Columbia Circuit, William H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice. For the First Circuit, David H. Souter, Associate Justice. For the Second Circuit, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice. For the Third Circuit, David H. Souter, Associate Justice. For the Fourth Circuit, William H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice. For the Fifth Circuit, Antonin Scalia, Associate Justice. For the Sixth Circuit, John Paul Stevens, Associate Justice. For the Seventh Circuit, John Paul Stevens, Associate Justice. For the Eighth Circuit, Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice. For the Ninth Circuit, Sandra Day O’Connor, Associate Justice. For the Tenth Circuit, Stephen Breyer, Associate Justice. For the Eleventh Circuit, Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice. For the Federal Circuit, William H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice. September 30, 1994. (For next previous allotment, and modifications, see 502 U. S., p. vi, 509 U. S., p. v, and 512 U. S., p. v.) iv Job: 536REP Unit: $U12 [12-23-03 16:31:36] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Note: All undesignated references herein to the United States Code are to the 2000 edition. Cases reported before page 901 are those decided with opinions of the Court or decisions per curiam. Cases reported on page 901 et seq. are those in which orders were entered. Page ABATE of Ga., Inc. v. Georgia Dept. of Public Safety ......... 924 Abdullah v. United States .............................. 977 Abdul-Muqsit v. Federated Department Stores, Inc. .......... 964 Abdur’Rahman v. Tennessee ............................ 978 Abouhalima v. United States ............................ 967 Abraham; Stewart v. .................................. 958 Acevedo-Cruz v. U. S. Parole Comm’n ..................... 914 Acuna v. Ayers ....................................... 927 Adair; Townsend v. .................................... 946 Adam v. Hawaii ...................................... 907 Addleman v. Payne .................................... 966 Aguilar-Plata v. United States ........................... 948 Ahmed v. Warden, Federal Corrections Institution, Englewood . 930 Aiello v. United States ................................. 961 Ainsworth v. Stanley .................................. 953 Akers v. Bishop ...................................... 941 Alabama; Broadnax v. .................................. 964 Alabama; Brown v. .................................... 964 Alabama; Holladay v. .................................. 957 Alabama; Perkins v. ................................... 953 Alameda Books, Inc.; Los Angeles v. ...................... 921 Alameida; Blas v. ..................................... 930 Alameida; Fries v. .................................... 973 Alameida; Hernandez v. ................................ 924 Alameida; Martin v. ................................... 928 Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. Prudential Assurance Co. Ltd. ....... 959 Alderman; Chavez v. .................................. 946 Al-Hakim v. Bealls Department Store 32 ................... 909 Ali v. United States ................................... 915 Alim v. United States .................................. 950 v Job: 536REP Unit: $U12 [12-23-03 16:31:36] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) vi TABLE OF CASES REPORTED Page Allen v. California .................................... 944 Allen v. United States ................................. 953 Allfirst Bank; Progress Rail Services Corp. v. ............... 905 Allmerica Financial Life Ins. Co.; Everhart v. ............... 958 Altman v. Kapture .................................... 923 Altschuler, In re ...................................... 974 Alvarez-Becerra v. United States ......................... 931 Al-Zubaidy v. United States ............................. 948 Amalfitano v. United States ............................. 939 Amaya-Matamoros v. United States ....................... 941 Amezcua v. United States ............................... 947 Amps v. Texas ....................................... 919 Amstutz; Kniskern v. .................................. 918 Anderson; Buell v. .................................... 989 Anderson v. United States ............................. 913,971 Andujar v. United States ............................... 971 Angelo Flores v. United States .......................... 950 Angelone; Arrington v. ................................. 910 Angelone; Barrow v. ................................... 942 Anthony v. Gaspar .................................... 927 Anthony v. North Carolina .............................. 930 Antonelli, In re ....................................... 938 Antonio Rodriguez v. United States ....................... 962 Aparco-Centeno v. United States ......................... 948 Appeals Judges of Mich.; Tidik v. ......................... 951 Appel; Danks v. ...................................... 922 Archer v. Warner..................................... 938 Arctic Slope Reg. Corp. v. NextWave Personal Communications 955,989 Arizona; Bandusky v. .................................. 918 Arizona; Blanco Lerma v. ............................... 966 Arizona; Harrod v. .................................... 953 Arizona; Pandeli v. .................................... 953 Arizona; Ring v. ...................................... 584 Arizona; Sansing v. .................................... 954 Arkansas; Hatfield v. .................................. 963 Arkansas; Jones v. .................................... 909 Arkansas Dept. of Ed.; Jackson v. ......................... 908 Arkansas Dept. of Human Services; Pugh v. ................. 927 Armstrong v. Greensboro .............................. 930,978 Armstrong v. Steppes Apartments, Ltd. ................... 951 Army Corps of Engineers; Borden Ranch Partnership v. ...... 903,981 Arnett, In re ........................................ 930 Arrington v. Angelone ................................. 910 Ashcroft; Blackburn v. ................................ 911,978 Job: 536REP Unit: $U12 [12-23-03 16:31:36] PGT: TCRBV (Bound Volume) TABLE OF CASES REPORTED vii Page Ashcroft; Cook v. ..................................... 977 Ashcroft v. North Jersey Media Group, Inc. ................. 954 Ashcroft; Tyler v. .................................... 945,986 Ashton v. United States ................................ 978 Aston Hotels & Resorts; Phonometrics, Inc. v. ............... 904 Atkins v. Virginia..................................... 304 Atkinson v. Commissioner of Correction of Conn. ............ 944 Attorney General; Blackburn v. ......................... 911,978 Attorney General; Cook v. .............................. 977 Attorney General v. North Jersey Media Group, Inc. .......... 954 Attorney General; Tyler v. ............................. 945,986 Attorney General of Cal.; McCraw v. ...................... 965 Attorney General of Nev.; Rowell v. ....................... 964 Attorney General of Vt.; National Electrical Mfrs. Assn. v. ..... 905 Atwell v. Mississippi ................................... 926 Atwood v. Burlington Northern .......................... 959 Avants v. United States ................................ 968 Aviles-Garcia v. United States ........................... 948 Ayers; Manuel Acuna v. ................................ 927 Azure v. United States ................................. 970 B., In re ............................................ 942 B. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human Resources ..... 942 Bad Wound v. United States ............................ 911,986 Baez v. Hall ......................................... 976 Baez v. Portuondo ...................................
Load more

  1015
Copy Link
Recommended publications
  • The Kansas Judiciary
    2018 Kansas Directory The Kansas Judiciary Kansas Judicial Center 301 S.W. 10th Ave., Topeka 66612-1507 785-296-3229 www.kscourts.org Kansas Supreme Court Chief Justice: Lawton R. Nuss Justices: Carol A. Beier, Dan Biles, Lee A. Johnson, Marla J. Luckert, Eric S. Rosen, Caleb Stegall The Kansas Supreme Court is the highest court in Kansas. It consists of seven justices, each of whom is selected by the governor from a list of three qualified individuals submitted by the Supreme Court Nominating Commission. After the first year in office, a justice is subject to a retention vote in the next general election. If a majority of electors votes to retain the justice, he or she remains in office for a term of six years. Justices are subject to a similar retention vote at the conclusion of each term. The justice who is senior in terms of continuous service is designated by the Kansas Constitution as the chief justice, unless he or she declines or resigns the position. The chief justice has general ad- ministrative supervision over the affairs of the court and of the unified judicial department of the state. Kansas Court of Appeals Chief Judge: Karen Arnold-Burger Judges: G. Gordon Atcheson, David E. Bruns, Michael B. Buser, Kathryn A. Gardner, Henry W. Green Jr., Stephen D. Hill, Steve A. Leben, Patrick D. McAnany, Thomas E. Malone, G. Joseph Pierron Jr., Anthony J. Powell, Kim R. Schroeder, Melissa Taylor Standridge The Kansas Court of Appeals consists of 14 judges. Candidates for appointment to the court of appeals apply to and are selected by the governor, subject to confirmation by a majority vote of the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • Appellate Practice Handbook
    KANSAS APPELLATE PRACTICE HANDBOOK 6TH EDITION KANSAS JUDICIAL COUNCIL Subscription Information The Kansas Appellate Practice Handbook is updated on a periodic basis with supplements to reflect important changes in both statutory law and case law. Your purchase of this publication automatically records your subscription for the update service. If you do not wish to receive the supplements, you must inform the Judicial Council. You may contact the Judicial Council by e-mail at [email protected], by telephone at (785) 296-2498 or by mail at: Kansas Judicial Council 301 SW 10th, Ste. 140 Topeka, KS 66612 © 2019 KANSAS JUDICIAL COUNCIL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii PREFACE TO THE SIXTH EDITION This is the first edition of the Handbook since the advent of electronic filing of appellate cases. All prior editions, while containing some useful suggestions, are obsolete. With clear marching orders from our Supreme Court, all appellate attorneys must enroll and monitor their cases. Paper filing is now relegated to litigants that are unrepresented. Prompted by these massive changes we have consolidated some chapters and subjects and created new sections for electronic filing. But there is more to an appeal than just getting in the door. Scheduling, briefing, and pre- and post-opinion motion practice are dealt with. We sincerely hope that this work will be helpful to all who practice in this important area of the law. It is an attempt to open up the mysteries of electronic filing of appellate cases in Kansas. I must shout from the rooftops my praise for Christy Molzen with the Kansas Judicial Council, who has done all of the heavy lifting in putting this handbook together.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wichita Massacre | SOURCES
    The Wichita Massacre | SOURCES “Heather Muller” - www.heatherscamp.org - By Tania Muller (sister) and Jill (Heitkotter) Crotty (sister in Delta Gamma) - March 2001 “Was This Kansas Killing Spree A Brotherly Affair?” - CNN.com - By Matt Bean - October 4, 2002 “D eputy Recalls Moment of Discovering Bodies “ - T he Wichita Eagle - By | Ron Sylvester – October 07, 2002 “C arr Trial: Survivor Describes Sexual Attacks by Armed Intruders” - The Topeka Capital-Journal - By - Roxana Hegeman – October 8, 2002 “W ichita Case of Black Racist Crime Survivor's Testimony Horrifies Courtroom ” - T he Wichita Eagle - By Ron Sylvester – October 09, 2002 “W oman Testifies That Carrs Killed Her Friends in a Soccer Field” - The Wichita Eagle - By| Ron Sylvester – October 10, 2002 “R eginald Carr Had $996, Victims' Credit Card, Watch” - The Wichita Eagle - By Hurst Laviana – October 11, 2002 “V ictims' Belongings Linked to Defendant” - T he Wichita Eagle - By Ron Sylvester – October 12, 2002 “Brutal Killings Grip Wichita Kansas” - The Edwardsville Intelligencer - By Roxana Hegeman - October 12, 2002 “Carjacking Victim Testifies in Murder Trial” - Lawrence Journal-World - No author listed - October 12, 2002 “T rial Opens Window Into Night of Fear” - The Wichita Eagle – By Ron Sylvester – October 13, 2002 “Witness: Suspected Killer Had Ring Stolen From Homicide Victims” - Arizona Daily Sun - no author listed - Oct 14, 2002 “I Was Afraid,' Witness Says” - The Wichita Eagle – By Ron Sylvester – October 15, 2002 “A TM Photos Shown in Carr trial” - The Topeka Capital-Journal/AP
    [Show full text]
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of the STATE of KANSAS No. 119,315
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 119,315 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. BRENT J. CARTER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A jury instruction must be both legally and factually appropriate. An instruction on the defendant's theory of defense is factually appropriate if there is sufficient evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the defendant, for a rational fact-finder to find for the defendant on that theory. 2. Under K.S.A. 22-3203, multiple complaints against a defendant can be tried together if the State could have brought the charges in a single complaint under K.S.A. 22-3202(1). 3. K.S.A. 22-3202(1) permits joining multiple charges in a single complaint if the charges: (1) are of the same or similar character; (2) are part of the same act or transaction; or (3) result from two or more acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan. 1 4. For the purposes of K.S.A. 22-3202(1), charges are connected together when: (1) a defendant provides evidence of one crime while committing another; (2) some of the charges are precipitated by the other charges; or (3) all of the charges stem from a common event or goal. Appeal from Sedgwick District Court; JEFFREY SYRIOS, judge. Opinion filed July 10, 2020. Affirmed. Ryan J. Eddinger, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, was on the brief for appellant. Lesley A. Isherwood, assistant district attorney, Marc Bennett, district attorney, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, were on the brief for appellee.
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering 18 U.S.C. § 1959 a Manual for Federal Prosecutors
    Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering 18 U.S.C. § 1959 A Manual for Federal Prosecutors December 2006 Prepared by the Staff of the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20005 (202) 514-3594 Frank J. Marine, Consultant Douglas E. Crow, Principal Deputy Chief Amy Chang Lee, Assistant Chief Robert C. Dalton Merv Hamburg Gregory C.J. Lisa Melissa Marquez-Oliver David J. Stander Catherine M. Weinstock Cover Design by Linda M. Baer PREFACE This manual is intended to assist federal prosecutors in the preparation and litigation of cases involving the Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering Statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1959. Prosecutors are encouraged to contact the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section (OCRS) early in the preparation of their case for advice and assistance. All pleadings alleging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1959 including any indictment, information, or criminal complaint, and a prosecution memorandum must be submitted to OCRS for review and approval before being filed with the court. The submission should be approved by the prosecutor’s office before being submitted to OCRS. Due to the volume of submissions received by OCRS, prosecutors should submit the proposal three weeks prior to the date final approval is needed. Prosecutors should contact OCRS regarding the status of the proposed submission before finally scheduling arrests or other time-sensitive actions relating to the submission. Moreover, prosecutors should refrain from finalizing any guilty plea agreement containing a Section 1959 charge until final approval has been obtained from OCRS. The policies and procedures set forth in this manual and elsewhere relating to 18 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Court of Appeals
    OFFICIALLY SELECTED CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS Reporter: SARA R. STRATTON Advance Sheets 2d Series Volume 59, No. 1 Opinions filed in October-November 2020 Cite as 59 Kan. App. 2d Copyright 2020 by Sara R. Stratton, Official Reporter For the use and benefit of the State of Kansas JUDGES AND OFFICERS OF THE KANSAS COURT OF APPEALS CHIEF JUDGE: HON. KAREN ARNOLD-BURGER ………………… Overland Park JUDGES: HON. HENRY W. GREEN, JR. ................................... Leavenworth HON. THOMAS E. MALONE ............................................. Wichita HON. STEPHEN D. HILL....................................................... Paola HON. MICHAEL B. BUSER ..................................... Overland Park HON. MELISSA TAYLOR STANDRIDGE................... Overland Park HON. G. GORDON ATCHESON ..................................... Westwood HON. DAVID E. BRUNS .................................................... Topeka HON. ANTHONY J. POWELL ............................................ Wichita HON. KIM R. SCHROEDER .............................................. Hugoton HON. KATHRYN A. GARDNER ......................................... Topeka HON. SARAH E. WARNER ................................................ Lenexa OFFICERS: Reporter of Decisions ................................... SARA R. STRATTON Clerk ............................................................ DOUGLAS T. SHIMA Judicial Administrator ..........................................NANCY DIXON Disciplinary Administrator ......................
    [Show full text]
  • KANSAS V. MARSH
    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2005 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus KANSAS v. MARSH CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS No. 04–1170. Argued December 7, 2005—Reargued April 25, 2006— Decided June 26, 2006 Finding three aggravating circumstances that were not outweighed by mitigating circumstances, a Kansas jury convicted respondent Marsh of, inter alia, capital murder and sentenced him to death. Marsh claimed on direct appeal that Kan. Stat. Ann. §21–4624(e) establishes an unconstitutional presumption in favor of death by directing impo- sition of the death penalty when aggravating and mitigating circum- stances are in equipoise. Agreeing, the Kansas Supreme Court con- cluded that §21–4624(e)’s weighing equation violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments and remanded for a new trial. Held: 1. This Court has jurisdiction to review the Kansas Supreme Court’s judgment under 28 U. S. C. §1257. That provision authorizes review of a State’s final judgment when a state statute’s validity is questioned on federal constitutional grounds, and it permits review even when the state-court proceedings are not complete where the federal claim has been finally decided and later review of the federal issue cannot be had, whatever the case’s outcome, Cox Broadcasting Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Order 2021-PR-009
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS Administrative Order 2021-PR-009 Order Continuing Administrative Orders Suspending Statutes of Limitation, Statutory Time Standards, Deadlines, and Time Limitations Under the Legislature's Ratification and Continuation of the State of Disaster Emergency related to COVID-19 through March 31, 2021. As the Chief Justice of the Kansas Supreme Court, I have issued multiple Administrative Orders under: • 2020 House Substitute for Senate Bill 102, which became effective upon its publication in the Kansas Register on March 19, 2020 (39 Kan. Reg. 304), and • the Legislature's amendments to 2020 House Substitute for Senate Bill 102, § 1, through 2020 Spec. Sess. House Bill 2016, § 24, which became effective upon its publication in the Kansas Register on June 9, 2020 (39 Kan. Reg. 755). This legislation allows me to "issue an order to extend or suspend any deadlines or time limitations established by statute." My administrative orders have coincided with the following: • 2020 Spec. Sess. House Bill 2016 ratified the state of disaster emergency declarations issued by the Governor and continued in existence the disaster emergency declaration issued for all 105 counties of Kansas, from March 12, 2020, through September 15, 2020. 2020 Spec. Sess. House Bill 2016, § 5, L. 2020 Spec. Session, Ch. 1, § 5. • On September 11, 2020, the State Finance Council voted to extend the state of disaster emergency through October 15, 2020. • On October 7, 2020, the State Finance Council voted to extend the state of disaster emergency from and including October 16, 2020, through November 15, 2020. 1 • On November 13, 2020, the State Finance Council voted to extend the state of disaster emergency from and including November 16, 2020, through December 15, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 117,439 ALYSIA R. TILLMAN and STORM FLEETWOOD, Appellants, v. KATHERINE A. GOODPASTURE, D.O., Appellee. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL DEREK SCHMIDT, Intervenor. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Determining whether a statute violates the Kansas Constitution is a question of law subject to unlimited review. 2. Section 5 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights declares, "The right of trial by jury shall be inviolate." It applies to give the right to trial by jury on issues of fact so tried at common law as it existed at the time the Kansas Constitution was adopted, but no further. 3. K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 60-1906(a) does not violate section 5 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights. 1 4. Section 18 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights guarantees for all persons, for injuries suffered in person, reputation, or property a "remedy by due course of law, and justice administered without delay." It does not create rights of action. It preserves the right to remedy by due process of law for civil causes of action recognized as justiciable by the common law as it existed at the time the Kansas Constitution was adopted. 5. K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 60-1906(a) does not violate section 18 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights. Review of the judgment of the Court of Appeals in 56 Kan. App. 2d 65, 424 P.3d 540 (2018). Appeal from Riley District Court; JOHN F. BOSCH, judge. Opinion filed April 30, 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercy Street” to Premiere January 17 on Pbs
    “MERCY STREET” TO PREMIERE JANUARY 17 ON PBS – Original Six-Episode Series to Take Viewers Beyond the Battlefield with Intimate, Human Look at Lives on the Civil War Home Front − MERCY STREET to Follow “Downton Abbey, The Final Season” on MASTERPIECE for a Powerful Sunday Night Lineup – – Award-Winning Creative Team Includes Ridley Scott, David Zabel, Lisa Quijano Wolfinger and David W. Zucker – ARLINGTON, VA; Updated December 16, 2015 – MERCY STREET, a new Civil War era drama produced in and around Richmond, Virginia, will debut Sunday, January 17, 2016, at 10:00 p.m. MERCY STREET will follow “Downton Abbey, The Final Season” on MASTERPIECE highlighting PBS as a home for internationally acclaimed television drama. The series is executive produced by Ridley Scott (Gladiator, Thelma and Louise); David W. Zucker (“The Good Wife” and “The Man in the High Castle”) of Scott Free; Lisa Q. Wolfinger (“Desperate Crossing, The untold story of the Mayflower”) and David Zabel (ER). Dean Devlin’s Electric Entertainment secured all foreign rights to the series early in the process, and will continue to sell to international territories. Based on real events, MERCY STREET takes viewers beyond the battlefield and into the lives of Americans on the Civil War home front as they face the unprecedented challenges of one of the most turbulent times in our nation’s history. Set in Virginia in the spring of 1862, MERCY STREET follows the lives of two volunteer nurses on opposite sides of the conflict; Mary Phinney, (Mary Elizabeth Winstead), a staunch New England abolitionist, and Emma Green, (Hannah James), a naive young Confederate belle.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Judicial Administration ~
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. - --------- --------- II ALb,' of JUSTiOe: National Criminal Justice Reference Service nCJrs BLIJEPRINT FOR THE 1980s: ~, This microfiche was produced from documents received for inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise An .Exe(:utive Summary control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, of the Kansas Judicial Branch the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality. 1980-1 981 Fiscal Year Office of Judicial Administration ~ .,. l' .~ 2 11111 ,8 \\\\\2.5 1.0 IJ& wI~ ~I"~ ~ I~ EXISTING PANEL 3PS Il.I III a:... .. m~ ;'::::::::;;:;;"":-"~'- NIlB 3 SPA BE" 200 AMp --1.1 ....... "TZo Sl61;1 c"So;Vn 6REAKERs \11111. 25, 111111.4 lllll1.6 I It f MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART f NATIONAL BUREMJ OF STANDARDS-\963-A i ,! , _ .. !( , 1"'" "- U.S. Department of Justice 82732 National Institute of JUstice This document has been re rod ry person or organization origin~ting~fe~o~~acl~y .as received from the n this document are Ihose of th' In s 0 view or opinions stated nd repr~sent' the off/cia I positidn or peoli~~hor~ tah do not necessarily Microfilming procedures used to create this fiche comply with Justlce., s 0 e National Institute of the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504. Permission to reprodu thO granted ~. ce IS copyrighted material has been Of lce of JUdicial Administration Points of view or opinions stated in this document are ..) = those of the author(s) .and do l10t represent the officiah ~a.sa) to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (,IJCJRS).
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Directory 2014
    Kansas Criminal Justice System Resource Directory 2014 Kansas Sentencing Commission i ii Membership of the Kansas Sentencing Commission Honorable Evelyn Z. Wilson, Chair District Judge, 3rd Judicial District Honorable W. Lee Fowler, Vice Chair Jennifer C. Roth District Judge, 5th Judicial District Public Defender, 3rd Judicial District Honorable Patrick D. McAnany Carolyn McGinn Kansas Court of Appeals Kansas Senate Ray Roberts David B. Haley Secretary of Corrections Kansas Senate David W. Riggin Tom Sawyer Kansas Prisoner Review Board Kansas House of Representatives Amy J. Hanley John J. Rubin Attorney General’s Office Kansas House of Representatives Kevin N. Berens J. Shawn Elliott County Attorney Attorney Elizabeth (Betsy) M. Gillespie Eddie J. Regan Director of Corrections, Johnson County Public Member Reverend Junius B. Dotson Chris A. Mechler Public Member Court Services iii Kansas Sentencing Commission Jayhawk Tower (785) 296-0923 700 SW Jackson, Suite 501 Fax (785) 296-0927 Topeka, Ks 66603-3757 http://www.sentencing.ks.gov Scott Schultz Carrie Krusor Executive Director Research Data Entry Operator III Brenda Harmon John Spurgeon Executive Director’s Special Assistant Finance Director Kunlun Chang Jennifer Dalton Director of Research Accountant Fengfang Lu Trish Beck Senior Research Analyst Program Assistant Chris Chavez Michele Velde Research Analyst Office Assistant Sean Ostrow George “Ebo” Browne SB 123 Program Manager/ Research Analyst Staff Attorney iv Table of Contents Membership of the Kansas Sentencing Commission ........................................
    [Show full text]