DOCSLIB.ORG

The Wichita Massacre | SOURCES

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Wichita Massacre | SOURCES The Wichita Massacre | SOURCES “Heather Muller” - www.heatherscamp.org - By Tania Muller (sister) and Jill (Heitkotter) Crotty (sister in Delta Gamma) - March 2001 “Was This Kansas Killing Spree A Brotherly Affair?” - CNN.com - By Matt Bean - October 4, 2002 “D eputy Recalls Moment of Discovering Bodies “ - T he Wichita Eagle - By | Ron Sylvester – October 07, 2002 “C arr Trial: Survivor Describes Sexual Attacks by Armed Intruders” - The Topeka Capital-Journal - By - Roxana Hegeman – October 8, 2002 “W ichita Case of Black Racist Crime Survivor's Testimony Horrifies Courtroom ” - T he Wichita Eagle - By Ron Sylvester – October 09, 2002 “W oman Testifies That Carrs Killed Her Friends in a Soccer Field” - The Wichita Eagle - By| Ron Sylvester – October 10, 2002 “R eginald Carr Had $996, Victims' Credit Card, Watch” - The Wichita Eagle - By Hurst Laviana – October 11, 2002 “V ictims' Belongings Linked to Defendant” - T he Wichita Eagle - By Ron Sylvester – October 12, 2002 “Brutal Killings Grip Wichita Kansas” - The Edwardsville Intelligencer - By Roxana Hegeman - October 12, 2002 “Carjacking Victim Testifies in Murder Trial” - Lawrence Journal-World - No author listed - October 12, 2002 “T rial Opens Window Into Night of Fear” - The Wichita Eagle – By Ron Sylvester – October 13, 2002 “Witness: Suspected Killer Had Ring Stolen From Homicide Victims” - Arizona Daily Sun - no author listed - Oct 14, 2002 “I Was Afraid,' Witness Says” - The Wichita Eagle – By Ron Sylvester – October 15, 2002 “A TM Photos Shown in Carr trial” - The Topeka Capital-Journal/AP - By Roxana Hegeman – October 16, 2002 “T estimony on Cellist Slaying Fills Carr Trial” - The Wichita Eagle - By Ron Sylvester – October 17, 2002 “S urvivor Says She Caught STD” - The Topeka Capital-Journal/AP – By Roxana Hegeman – October 18, 2002 “C arr Trial to Focus on Guns and DNA” - T he Wichita Eagle - By Ron Sylvester – October 19, 2002 “L uck, Vivid Memories Helped Cops” - T he Wichita Eagle - By | Ron Sylvester – October 20, 2002 “E vidence in Carr Trial Gruesome, Unavoidable” - T he Wichita Eagle – By Ron Sylvester – October 23, 2002 “Wichita Slayings Autopsies Shared” - Lawrence Journal-World - No author listed - October 23, 2002 “Coroner Tells of Abuse Before Deaths” - The Washington Times - No author listed - October 23, 2002 “S tate to Rest Case Against the Carrs” - T he Wichita Eagle – By Ron Sylvester – October 25, 2002 “S tate Rests; Carrs Begin Their Side” - T he Wichita Eagle – By Ron Sylvester – October 26, 2002 “D NA Lets the Dead Speak in Carr Trial” - T he Wichita Eagle - By Ron Sylvester – October 27, 2002 “C arr Jurors Get Break as Deliberation Rules Ironed Out” - The Wichita Eagle - By Ron Sylvester – October 28, 2002 “S urvivor's Police Interview Rattles Carr Trial Jurors” - The Wichita Eagle - By Ron Sylvester – October 30, 2002 “C arrs' Defense Rests; Jury Deliberation Near” - The Wichita Eagle - By Ron Sylvester – October 31, 2002 “D eliberations Begin in Carr Trial - Closing Arguments Move Juror to Tears” - T he Topeka Capital-Journal – By R oxana Hegeman – November 01, 2002 “Jury Adjourns in Wichita Killing Case” - apnews.com - By Roxana Hegeman - November 2, 2002 “G UILTY - Now Jury Decides if They Will Live or Die” - T he Wichita Eagle By Ron Sylvester – November 05, 2002 “D efense Seeks Mercy in Kan. Murders” - A P via Yahoo! News – By Roxana Hegeman - November 05, 2002 “Carrs Found Guilty of Murder” - Lawrence Journal-World - No author listed November 5, 2002 “Killers’ Mom Apologizes to Sons, Court” - The Washington Times - No author listed - November 6, 2002 “C arrs' Mother Testifies” - T opeka Capital-Journal - By Roxana Hegeman – November 6, 2002 “C arr Brothers Not Monsters, Women Insist” - T he Wichita Eagle -B y Ron Sylvester – November 07, 2002 “Reginald Carr's Wife Tells Jurors About His Children” – Associated Press – By Roxana Hegeman – November 07, 2002 “C arrs Knew Violence and Instability as Children” - The Wichita Eagle – By Ron Sylvester - Nov. 10, 2002 “True Crime: The Wichita Massacre” - mentalfloss.com - By Kara Kovalchik - August 15, 2008 “Jason Befort, Brad Heyka, Heather Muller, Ann Walenta and Aaron Sander” - Ancestry.com Thread - By cantorjoeocho - S eptember 25, 2008 “’Wichita Massacre’ Brothers Sentenced to Death” - cnsnews.com - By Jim Burns - July 7, 2009 “Ten Years Later, Carr Brothers' Murders Still Haunt” - The Wichita Eagle - By Ron Sylvester - December 15, 2010 “DA Talks Implications of Carr Brothers’ Death Penalty Appeals” - KAKE News - no author listed - December 12, 2013 “In Loving Memory of Heather Muller & Those Who Died in the Wichita Massacre (December 14 to 15, 2000)” - victimsfamiliesforthedeathpenalty.blogspot - no author listed - December 15, 2013 Supreme Court of Kansas - State of Kansas, Appellee, v. Reginald Dexter Carr, J., Appellant No. 90,044. Decided: July 25, 2014 “Brothers Who Forced Five Friends to Have Sex With Each Other Before Shooting Them In The Head and Burying Them in Shallow Snow Escape Death Penalty on 'Trial Technicality'” - Dailymail.co.UK - By Associated Press Reporter - July 25, 2014 “U PDATE: Carr Brothers' Death Penalty Revocations Bring Questions About Supreme Court Appointments ” - kmuw.org - By Aileen Leblanc - July 28, 2014 “Supreme Court Wrestles With Legal Aftermath of ‘Wichita Massacre’” - www.mcclatchydc.com - By Michael Doyle - October 7, 2014 “U.S. Supreme Court Skeptical of Kansas Supreme Court’s Decision in Carr, Gleason Cases” - The Topeka Capital-Journal - By Justin Wingerter - October 7, 2015 “Justices say Kansas court wrongly overturned death sentences in ‘Wichita massacre’” - The Kansas City Star - No author listed - October 14, 2015 “Supreme Court to Review Jury Instructions in Three Capital Cases” - Criminal Justice Legal Foundation - By Kent S. Scheidegger - October 6, 2015 “Wichita Massacre” - Crime Scene Database - By Fredrik - December 8, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - KANSAS v . CARR CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS No. 14–449. Argued October 7, 2015—Decided January 20, 2016 “‘Wichita Massacre’ Brothers Get Zero Sympathy From The Supreme Court - Kansas hasn’t executed anyone in 50 years. Will it start now?” - Huffington Post - By Cristian Farias - January 20, 2016 “SCOTUS Reinstates Death Sentences in ‘Wichita Massacre,’ Cover-up Killings” Sotomayor Dissents - ABAjournal.com - By Debra Cassens Weiss - January 20, 2016 “U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against ‘Wichita Massacre’ Brothers” - Businessinsider.com - By Lawrence Hurley - January 20, 2016 “Supreme Court Rules Against ‘Wichita Massacre’ Brothers in Death Penalty Case” - gawker.com - By Brendan O’Connor - January 20, 2016 “Victims’ Families Advocate Against Judge Retention” - gctelegram.com - By Angie Haflich - October 27, 2016 “Capital Punishment - Kansas v. Carr” - Harvard Law Review - No author listed - November 10, 2016 “C ases of Jonathan Carr, Reginald Carr return to Kansas Supreme Court” - Topeka Capital-Journal - By Steve Fry - May 3, 2017 “K ansas court considers new sentencings in ‘Wichita massacre’” - www.apnews.com - By John Hanna - May 4, 2017 “Murder in the Heartland: The Wichita Massacre” - didyouknowfacts.com - By Matt Gilligan - no date given “Carr Brothers convicted of brutal murders and sentenced to death” - www.wichita-massacre.com - No author given - no date given “Brad Heyka Memorial Golf Tournament” - www.bluegolf.com .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Does the State of Kansas Have the Death Penalty
    Does The State Of Kansas Have The Death Penalty Daryl blether retrospectively as splanchnic Fabian bean her octameters blue-pencil coincidentally. Saunders remains ungilded: she regather her feldspathoids costume too carelessly? Overblown Garret hurry-scurry, his gloss dismantling clipped quaveringly. Infoplease is evidenced by her, neil and librarian who he requested the penalty the of state kansas death penalty through collateral review through the. William Logan, also a forensic psychiatrist, who opined that Kahler was absent of forming the requisite intent and premeditation. Prosecutors and defense attorneys often allocate more because a year preparing for that penalty trials. Retaliation is also prohibited by university policy. The powerful also cancel that prosecutorial misconduct had occurred. Hoch states still in a murderer is the state kansas death of the slaying of criminal defendant. Although emotions were handy because of music death policy a law enforcement officer, told judge ruled that premeditation did not communicate, so Shively was high over on permanent charge of intentional second the murder. The government almost killed me and dozens of an innocent individuals across the guy who were wrongfully sentenced to death. Data released today wet the Bureau of. The House Corrections and Juvenile Justice Committee met Feb. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware. Does not dissuade him ineligible for limited appeal, or denying relief, the deaths of death penalty case, and the page are moving to the state lines. This Court, however, so not garnish as a moral authority. Marisa iati is found that a master of proving beyond a state once threatened to have the state kansas does of death penalty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kansas Judiciary
    2018 Kansas Directory The Kansas Judiciary Kansas Judicial Center 301 S.W. 10th Ave., Topeka 66612-1507 785-296-3229 www.kscourts.org Kansas Supreme Court Chief Justice: Lawton R. Nuss Justices: Carol A. Beier, Dan Biles, Lee A. Johnson, Marla J. Luckert, Eric S. Rosen, Caleb Stegall The Kansas Supreme Court is the highest court in Kansas. It consists of seven justices, each of whom is selected by the governor from a list of three qualified individuals submitted by the Supreme Court Nominating Commission. After the first year in office, a justice is subject to a retention vote in the next general election. If a majority of electors votes to retain the justice, he or she remains in office for a term of six years. Justices are subject to a similar retention vote at the conclusion of each term. The justice who is senior in terms of continuous service is designated by the Kansas Constitution as the chief justice, unless he or she declines or resigns the position. The chief justice has general ad- ministrative supervision over the affairs of the court and of the unified judicial department of the state. Kansas Court of Appeals Chief Judge: Karen Arnold-Burger Judges: G. Gordon Atcheson, David E. Bruns, Michael B. Buser, Kathryn A. Gardner, Henry W. Green Jr., Stephen D. Hill, Steve A. Leben, Patrick D. McAnany, Thomas E. Malone, G. Joseph Pierron Jr., Anthony J. Powell, Kim R. Schroeder, Melissa Taylor Standridge The Kansas Court of Appeals consists of 14 judges. Candidates for appointment to the court of appeals apply to and are selected by the governor, subject to confirmation by a majority vote of the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • Appellate Practice Handbook
    KANSAS APPELLATE PRACTICE HANDBOOK 6TH EDITION KANSAS JUDICIAL COUNCIL Subscription Information The Kansas Appellate Practice Handbook is updated on a periodic basis with supplements to reflect important changes in both statutory law and case law. Your purchase of this publication automatically records your subscription for the update service. If you do not wish to receive the supplements, you must inform the Judicial Council. You may contact the Judicial Council by e-mail at [email protected], by telephone at (785) 296-2498 or by mail at: Kansas Judicial Council 301 SW 10th, Ste. 140 Topeka, KS 66612 © 2019 KANSAS JUDICIAL COUNCIL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii PREFACE TO THE SIXTH EDITION This is the first edition of the Handbook since the advent of electronic filing of appellate cases. All prior editions, while containing some useful suggestions, are obsolete. With clear marching orders from our Supreme Court, all appellate attorneys must enroll and monitor their cases. Paper filing is now relegated to litigants that are unrepresented. Prompted by these massive changes we have consolidated some chapters and subjects and created new sections for electronic filing. But there is more to an appeal than just getting in the door. Scheduling, briefing, and pre- and post-opinion motion practice are dealt with. We sincerely hope that this work will be helpful to all who practice in this important area of the law. It is an attempt to open up the mysteries of electronic filing of appellate cases in Kansas. I must shout from the rooftops my praise for Christy Molzen with the Kansas Judicial Council, who has done all of the heavy lifting in putting this handbook together.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of the STATE of KANSAS No. 119,315
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 119,315 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. BRENT J. CARTER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A jury instruction must be both legally and factually appropriate. An instruction on the defendant's theory of defense is factually appropriate if there is sufficient evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the defendant, for a rational fact-finder to find for the defendant on that theory. 2. Under K.S.A. 22-3203, multiple complaints against a defendant can be tried together if the State could have brought the charges in a single complaint under K.S.A. 22-3202(1). 3. K.S.A. 22-3202(1) permits joining multiple charges in a single complaint if the charges: (1) are of the same or similar character; (2) are part of the same act or transaction; or (3) result from two or more acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan. 1 4. For the purposes of K.S.A. 22-3202(1), charges are connected together when: (1) a defendant provides evidence of one crime while committing another; (2) some of the charges are precipitated by the other charges; or (3) all of the charges stem from a common event or goal. Appeal from Sedgwick District Court; JEFFREY SYRIOS, judge. Opinion filed July 10, 2020. Affirmed. Ryan J. Eddinger, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, was on the brief for appellant. Lesley A. Isherwood, assistant district attorney, Marc Bennett, district attorney, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, were on the brief for appellee.
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering 18 U.S.C. § 1959 a Manual for Federal Prosecutors
    Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering 18 U.S.C. § 1959 A Manual for Federal Prosecutors December 2006 Prepared by the Staff of the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20005 (202) 514-3594 Frank J. Marine, Consultant Douglas E. Crow, Principal Deputy Chief Amy Chang Lee, Assistant Chief Robert C. Dalton Merv Hamburg Gregory C.J. Lisa Melissa Marquez-Oliver David J. Stander Catherine M. Weinstock Cover Design by Linda M. Baer PREFACE This manual is intended to assist federal prosecutors in the preparation and litigation of cases involving the Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering Statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1959. Prosecutors are encouraged to contact the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section (OCRS) early in the preparation of their case for advice and assistance. All pleadings alleging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1959 including any indictment, information, or criminal complaint, and a prosecution memorandum must be submitted to OCRS for review and approval before being filed with the court. The submission should be approved by the prosecutor’s office before being submitted to OCRS. Due to the volume of submissions received by OCRS, prosecutors should submit the proposal three weeks prior to the date final approval is needed. Prosecutors should contact OCRS regarding the status of the proposed submission before finally scheduling arrests or other time-sensitive actions relating to the submission. Moreover, prosecutors should refrain from finalizing any guilty plea agreement containing a Section 1959 charge until final approval has been obtained from OCRS. The policies and procedures set forth in this manual and elsewhere relating to 18 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Court of Appeals
    OFFICIALLY SELECTED CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS Reporter: SARA R. STRATTON Advance Sheets 2d Series Volume 59, No. 1 Opinions filed in October-November 2020 Cite as 59 Kan. App. 2d Copyright 2020 by Sara R. Stratton, Official Reporter For the use and benefit of the State of Kansas JUDGES AND OFFICERS OF THE KANSAS COURT OF APPEALS CHIEF JUDGE: HON. KAREN ARNOLD-BURGER ………………… Overland Park JUDGES: HON. HENRY W. GREEN, JR. ................................... Leavenworth HON. THOMAS E. MALONE ............................................. Wichita HON. STEPHEN D. HILL....................................................... Paola HON. MICHAEL B. BUSER ..................................... Overland Park HON. MELISSA TAYLOR STANDRIDGE................... Overland Park HON. G. GORDON ATCHESON ..................................... Westwood HON. DAVID E. BRUNS .................................................... Topeka HON. ANTHONY J. POWELL ............................................ Wichita HON. KIM R. SCHROEDER .............................................. Hugoton HON. KATHRYN A. GARDNER ......................................... Topeka HON. SARAH E. WARNER ................................................ Lenexa OFFICERS: Reporter of Decisions ................................... SARA R. STRATTON Clerk ............................................................ DOUGLAS T. SHIMA Judicial Administrator ..........................................NANCY DIXON Disciplinary Administrator ......................
    [Show full text]
  • KANSAS V. MARSH
    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2005 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus KANSAS v. MARSH CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS No. 04–1170. Argued December 7, 2005—Reargued April 25, 2006— Decided June 26, 2006 Finding three aggravating circumstances that were not outweighed by mitigating circumstances, a Kansas jury convicted respondent Marsh of, inter alia, capital murder and sentenced him to death. Marsh claimed on direct appeal that Kan. Stat. Ann. §21–4624(e) establishes an unconstitutional presumption in favor of death by directing impo- sition of the death penalty when aggravating and mitigating circum- stances are in equipoise. Agreeing, the Kansas Supreme Court con- cluded that §21–4624(e)’s weighing equation violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments and remanded for a new trial. Held: 1. This Court has jurisdiction to review the Kansas Supreme Court’s judgment under 28 U. S. C. §1257. That provision authorizes review of a State’s final judgment when a state statute’s validity is questioned on federal constitutional grounds, and it permits review even when the state-court proceedings are not complete where the federal claim has been finally decided and later review of the federal issue cannot be had, whatever the case’s outcome, Cox Broadcasting Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Ÿþa M E R I C a N R E N a I S S a N C E , a U G U S T 2 0
    American Renaissance There is not a truth existing which I fear or would wish unknown to the whole world. — Thomas Jefferson Vol. 13 No. 8 August 2002 The Wichita Massacre The crime–and motive–the basketball practice around 9:15, and at shouting. Her boyfriend cried out in sur- 10:00, H.G. decided to go to bed. Be- prise as someone forced open the door media ignored. fore joining H.G in bed, Mr. Befort made to the bedroom. H.G saw “a tall black male standing in the doorway.” She by Stephen Webster didn’t know how the man got into the house, and police investigators have not n September 9, Reginald Carr said how they think the Carrs got in. She and his brother Jonathan go on says the man, whom she later identified Otrial for what has become as Jonathan Carr, ripped the covers off known as the Wichita Massacre. The the bed. Soon, another black man two black men are accused of a week- brought Aaron Sander in from the liv- long crime spree that culminated in the ing room at gunpoint and threw him onto quadruple homicide of four young the bed. H.G. saw that both men were whites in a snowy soccer field in armed. She said they wanted to know Wichita, Kansas. In all, the Carr broth- Jonathan (left) and Reginald Carr. who else was in house, and the terrified ers robbed, raped or murdered seven whites told them about Mr. Heyka in the people. They face 58 counts each, rang- sure all the lights in the house were basement and Miss Muller in the other ing from first-degree murder, rape, and turned off and all the doors were locked.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Order 2021-PR-009
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS Administrative Order 2021-PR-009 Order Continuing Administrative Orders Suspending Statutes of Limitation, Statutory Time Standards, Deadlines, and Time Limitations Under the Legislature's Ratification and Continuation of the State of Disaster Emergency related to COVID-19 through March 31, 2021. As the Chief Justice of the Kansas Supreme Court, I have issued multiple Administrative Orders under: • 2020 House Substitute for Senate Bill 102, which became effective upon its publication in the Kansas Register on March 19, 2020 (39 Kan. Reg. 304), and • the Legislature's amendments to 2020 House Substitute for Senate Bill 102, § 1, through 2020 Spec. Sess. House Bill 2016, § 24, which became effective upon its publication in the Kansas Register on June 9, 2020 (39 Kan. Reg. 755). This legislation allows me to "issue an order to extend or suspend any deadlines or time limitations established by statute." My administrative orders have coincided with the following: • 2020 Spec. Sess. House Bill 2016 ratified the state of disaster emergency declarations issued by the Governor and continued in existence the disaster emergency declaration issued for all 105 counties of Kansas, from March 12, 2020, through September 15, 2020. 2020 Spec. Sess. House Bill 2016, § 5, L. 2020 Spec. Session, Ch. 1, § 5. • On September 11, 2020, the State Finance Council voted to extend the state of disaster emergency through October 15, 2020. • On October 7, 2020, the State Finance Council voted to extend the state of disaster emergency from and including October 16, 2020, through November 15, 2020. 1 • On November 13, 2020, the State Finance Council voted to extend the state of disaster emergency from and including November 16, 2020, through December 15, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 117,439 ALYSIA R. TILLMAN and STORM FLEETWOOD, Appellants, v. KATHERINE A. GOODPASTURE, D.O., Appellee. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL DEREK SCHMIDT, Intervenor. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Determining whether a statute violates the Kansas Constitution is a question of law subject to unlimited review. 2. Section 5 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights declares, "The right of trial by jury shall be inviolate." It applies to give the right to trial by jury on issues of fact so tried at common law as it existed at the time the Kansas Constitution was adopted, but no further. 3. K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 60-1906(a) does not violate section 5 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights. 1 4. Section 18 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights guarantees for all persons, for injuries suffered in person, reputation, or property a "remedy by due course of law, and justice administered without delay." It does not create rights of action. It preserves the right to remedy by due process of law for civil causes of action recognized as justiciable by the common law as it existed at the time the Kansas Constitution was adopted. 5. K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 60-1906(a) does not violate section 18 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights. Review of the judgment of the Court of Appeals in 56 Kan. App. 2d 65, 424 P.3d 540 (2018). Appeal from Riley District Court; JOHN F. BOSCH, judge. Opinion filed April 30, 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • American Renaissance There Is Not a Truth Existing Which I Fear Or Would Wish Unknown to the Whole World
    American Renaissance There is not a truth existing which I fear or would wish unknown to the whole world. — Thomas Jefferson Vol. 13 No. 8 August 2002 The Wichita Massacre The crime–and motive–the basketball practice around 9:15, and at shouting. Her boyfriend cried out in sur- 10:00, H.G. decided to go to bed. Be- prise as someone forced open the door media ignored. fore joining H.G in bed, Mr. Befort made to the bedroom. H.G saw “a tall black male standing in the doorway.” She by Stephen Webster didn’t know how the man got into the house, and police investigators have not n September 9, Reginald Carr said how they think the Carrs got in. She and his brother Jonathan go on says the man, whom she later identified Otrial for what has become as Jonathan Carr, ripped the covers off known as the Wichita Massacre. The the bed. Soon, another black man two black men are accused of a week- brought Aaron Sander in from the liv- long crime spree that culminated in the ing room at gunpoint and threw him onto quadruple homicide of four young the bed. H.G. saw that both men were whites in a snowy soccer field in armed. She said they wanted to know Wichita, Kansas. In all, the Carr broth- Jonathan (left) and Reginald Carr. who else was in house, and the terrified ers robbed, raped or murdered seven whites told them about Mr. Heyka in the people. They face 58 counts each, rang- sure all the lights in the house were basement and Miss Muller in the other ing from first-degree murder, rape, and turned off and all the doors were locked.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Judicial Administration ~
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. - --------- --------- II ALb,' of JUSTiOe: National Criminal Justice Reference Service nCJrs BLIJEPRINT FOR THE 1980s: ~, This microfiche was produced from documents received for inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise An .Exe(:utive Summary control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, of the Kansas Judicial Branch the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality. 1980-1 981 Fiscal Year Office of Judicial Administration ~ .,. l' .~ 2 11111 ,8 \\\\\2.5 1.0 IJ& wI~ ~I"~ ~ I~ EXISTING PANEL 3PS Il.I III a:... .. m~ ;'::::::::;;:;;"":-"~'- NIlB 3 SPA BE" 200 AMp --1.1 ....... "TZo Sl61;1 c"So;Vn 6REAKERs \11111. 25, 111111.4 lllll1.6 I It f MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART f NATIONAL BUREMJ OF STANDARDS-\963-A i ,! , _ .. !( , 1"'" "- U.S. Department of Justice 82732 National Institute of JUstice This document has been re rod ry person or organization origin~ting~fe~o~~acl~y .as received from the n this document are Ihose of th' In s 0 view or opinions stated nd repr~sent' the off/cia I positidn or peoli~~hor~ tah do not necessarily Microfilming procedures used to create this fiche comply with Justlce., s 0 e National Institute of the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504. Permission to reprodu thO granted ~. ce IS copyrighted material has been Of lce of JUdicial Administration Points of view or opinions stated in this document are ..) = those of the author(s) .and do l10t represent the officiah ~a.sa) to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (,IJCJRS).
    [Show full text]