DOCSLIB.ORG

CPM-Aprilie 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CPM-Aprilie 2005 Commission for European Integration of the Romanian Parliament Joint Parliamental Committee Romania European Union (the XVIIIth reunion, Bucharest, 7-8 April 2005) Subject: “ Implementation of the administration and judicial reforms. Fight against corruption and organized crime. Rapporteurs: Anca BOAGIU, deputy, vice-president of CIE (coordinator) Sorin Cristian DUMITRESCU, deputy ECKSTEIN Kovacs Peter, deputy Vlad Gabriel HOGEA, deputy Antonie IORGOVAN, senator Marian Jean MARINESCU, deputy Nicolae-Vlad POPA, senator In the last year, the activity of Romania‘s preparation to join the European Union comprised the improvement of state institutions, so that the implementation of the Acquis communautaire to be realized according to the commitments assumed by Romania, avoiding the application of the safeguarding clauses. For this, the legislative framework was finalized, necessary programming documents were adopted, and the institutional framework in the essential fields was developed in order to insure the good development of state institutions’ activities: a) Increase in efficiency of the public, central and local administration; b) Increase in efficiency and insuring the independence of the judicial system; c) Improvement of the mechanisms for the fight against corruption; d) Increase in efficiency for the fight against organized crime. All this activity developed in an accelerating manner in the last half of 2004, and in the first quarter of 2005. Until now, all commitments from the negotiation dossier on chapter 24 – Justice and Internal Affairs (JAI) have been fulfilled. CPM: Implementation of the administration and judicial reforms. Fight against corruption and organized crime. 1 Commission for European Integration of the Romanian Parliament a) The increase in efficiency of the public, central and local administration Since Mai 2004, the Romanian Government’s strategy regarding the acceleration of the public administration reform1 was adopted. Following agreement concluded with the European Commission, three domains have been identified, for which significant progresses are provided for in this period: - Decentralization and deconcentration of public services; - Increase in efficiency in public function; - Improvement of the public policies formulation process. The Law governing the decentralization was adopted in 20042, regulating: - The principles and criteria based on which the decentralization is carried out; - The cooperation manner between the local public administration authorities; - Introduction and regulation of the financial balance principle and of the principle of coordination between administrative and financial decentralization. The key-element of the deconcentration process, namely the transfer of the Prefect position among public officers, is to be realized in 2006, according to the Law regarding the Prefect’s institution, adopted in 20043. The deconcentration process was completed by the elaboration of certain normative acts, through which the responsibilities were transferred from the central administration to the local public authorities, responsibilities such as the identity cards issuing, passports evidence, civil protection and defense against fires, Community Police. The National Public Officers’ Agency continued the institutional development process in order to elaborate and coordinate policies of human resources management in the public function system. The analysis of this processes by experts of the European Union SIGMA program, led to the efficiency of the activity4 and to the approval at the end of 2004 by Government Decision, of a new Regulation of the Agency. The Agency continued to implement the training programs of officers, and continued to monitor the implementation of the Public Officers’ Conduct Code5. In Mai 2004, the National Administration Institute signed the cooperation memorandum with the Germen Company InWent. The Project "Adaptation of the central level of the public administration from Romania to the structures of the European Union" is developed by the German company in partnership with the Institute for European Policy – Berlin, National Administration Institute, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry for European Integration, Ministry of Administration and the Interior, and is supported by the German Federal Government, represented by the Federal Minister of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). 1 GD no 699/5.05.2004 2 Law no. 339/12-07-2004 3 Law no. 340/12-07-2004 4 Strategy regarding the unitary remuneration system of public officers. The Guide regarding the individual performances evaluation. The Guide regarding carrier development in public office 5 adopted by Law 7/2004 CPM: Implementation of the administration and judicial reforms. Fight against corruption and organized crime. 2 Commission for European Integration of the Romanian Parliament The PHARE project « Development of the operational capacity of the National Administration Institute» includes the development of the training capacity, the elaboration and implementation of training modules, implementation of the concept “training of trainers” which will finally lead to the transformation of the Institute into an excellence center, integrated in the national education network. Following these activity improvement efforts, the quality criteria necessary for the ISO 9001 certification of INA have been met, the certificate being issued at the end of 2004. b) Increase in efficiency and insuring the independence of the judicial system The basic legislative framework has been modified in 2004 following the adoption of the new Romanian Constitution, by adopting: the Judicial Organization Law6, the Law regarding the Magistrates Status7 and the Law regarding the Superior Magistracy Council8 (SMC). A series of administrative measures have been taken in order to increase efficiency, transparency and independence of the justice act: since March 1st 2005, the random distribution of cases is operational for all courts in the country. The financing sources for the electronic endowment of the courts have been provided for. At the end of March 2005, the Strategy for Reform in the Judicial System and the Action plan for its implementation have been updated and approved9. The strategy focuses on granting independence to the justice and insuring transparency and the quality of the justice act, while increasing the efficiency and responsibility of the judicial system. Measures for the adjustment of the judicial system to the demands of cases involving minors are requested, to correspond to the European standards regarding the observance of children rights. The reform of the judicial system also focuses on the alignment of the detention conditions to European standards, with the strict observance of human rights. For this, the elaboration of a long-term plan is foreseen for the construction of new detention houses and for the renovation of the existent detention spaces. On the same note, the process of demilitarization of the Prisons’ administration system shall be continued. The plan comprises precise actions and terms for the application of the Strategy, including: implementation of the Magistrates Deontology Code, regulation of the incompatibility between a SMC member quality and the leading positions within Courts and Prosecutor’s offices, responsibility of the Magistrates for exercising their function in bad faith or severe negligence, modification of the Civil and Criminal Procedure Codes, reduction of the judicial procedures, unification of the judicial practice. The High Court of Causation and Justice elaborated the Plan for reduction of overdue file load and introduced it in the National Strategy for reform of the judicial system. 6 Law no. 304/28.06.2004 7 Law no. 303/28.06.2004 8 Law no. 317/1.07.2005 9 GD no. 231/30.03.2005 CPM: Implementation of the administration and judicial reforms. Fight against corruption and organized crime. 3 Commission for European Integration of the Romanian Parliament Following enforcement of the European Convention in the field11 the protection of crime victims was insured by Law10. The organization and function Regulation for the National Office for Witness Protection has been elaborated12. A series of normative acts are in the elaboration’s stage by the Ministry of Justice, and are to be presented before the Legislative in the fist half of 2005, as follows: reduction of the number and size of Military Courts following the legal decrease in their competency, amendment of the legislation regarding the fight against fraud and fiscal evasion and the increase of alternative methods for solution of litigations (mediation). c. Improvement of the mechanisms for the fight against corruption The Supreme Council for Country Defense included the fight against corruption in the Romanian National Security Strategy, corruption being considered a risk factor to national security. The independent audit regarding the results and impact generated by the national anti-corruption strategy 2001-2004, was elaborated. The government approved March 30th 2005, the National multi-annual Anti-Corruption Strategy (NAS) and the respective Action Plan, which include also the conclusions and recommendations of the abovementioned audit13. In the 3 primary fields, SNA comprises 10 objectives, among those: the reduction of the number of structures with attributions in the fight against corruption, strengthening of the institutional capacity of National Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (NAP) and the celerity increase
Load more

Recommended publications
  • De La Monosemie La Polisemie În Terminologia Stiintifica
    UNIVERSITATEA DIN BUCURE ŞTI DE LA MONOSEMIE LA POLISEMIE ÎN TERMINOLOGIA ŞTIIN łIFIC Ă ACTUAL Ă Tez ă de doctorat CONDUC ĂTOR ŞTIIN łIFIC prof. univ. dr. Angela Bidu – Vr ănceanu AUTORUL Monica – Mihaela Rizea BUCURE ŞTI 2009 CUPRINS PARTEA I PERSPECTIVE TEORETICE ŞI PRINCIPII DE ANALIZ Ă Cuvânt înainte 1. Parcurs teoretic în terminologie – de la monosemie, la polisemie................16 1.1. Dou ă abord ări distincte – terminologia intern ă vs. terminologia extern ă....16 1.1.1. Terminologia intern ă sau terminologia propriu-zis ă..........................17 1.1.1.1. Considera Ńii generale.............................................................17 1.1.1.2. O perspectiv ă asupra termenului – termenul-concept sau termenul-etichet ă...................................................................21 1.1.2. Terminologia extern ă sau terminologia din perspectiv ă lingvistic ă..26 1.1.2.1. Considera Ńii generale.............................................................26 1.1.2.2. Direc Ńii teoretice....................................................................27 1.1.2.3. Termenul ca termen-lexem....................................................28 1.2. Terminologia intern ă şi terminologia extern ă - teorii în complementaritate...........................................................................33 2. Polisemia din perspectiva terminologiei externe.............................................52 2.1. Considera Ńii generale.....................................................................................52 2.2. Tipuri
    [Show full text]
  • EU Grant Agreement Number: 290529
    This project is co-funded by the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development of the European Union EU Grant Agreement number: 290529 Project acronym: ANTICORRP Project title: Anti-Corruption Policies Revisited Work Package: WP8 Corruption, assistance and development Title of deliverable: D8.1.5 Romanian public procurement in the construction sector. Corruption risks and particularistic links Due date of deliverable: 28 February 2015 Actual submission date: 30 March 2015 Editor: Alina Mungiu-Pippidi Authors: Mădălina Doroftei, Valentina Dimulescu Romanian Academic Society Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme Dissemination Level PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) Co Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) The information and views set out in this publication are those of the author(s) only and do not reflect any collective opinion of the ANTICORRP consortium, nor do they reflect the official opinion of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the European Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. Romanian public procurement in the construction sector. Corruption risks and particularistic links ABSTRACT Improving infrastructure in Romania has been a significant project in the past 25 years. Unfortunately, although large amounts of public funds were spent in the construction sector from 2007 to 2013 (an average of 6.6% of GDP), the physical results in terms of project quality and completion do not match this investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom House's Romanian Government Transition Support Program
    Freedom House's Romanian Government Transition Support Program Quarterly Report July I-September 30, 2000 I. Program Objectives On April 1, 2000, Freedom House received a three-year cost extension from the US Agency for International Development to continue its Romanian Government Transition Support Program. This program aims to: • strengthen the organizational and management capabilities of key Romanian government institutions; strengthen the internal and external capabilities of the Romanian government; • support the development of organizational structures and management systems within state institutions in order to facilitate competent governance and decision­ making. II. Activities and Impact 1. Professional Internship Training with American Counterparts Freedom House organized, starting September 8, 2000 a ten-week internship program for four Romanian government officials. The four participants were: Lucia-Ioana Baicoianu, Juridical Counselor, National Agency for Regionnal Development, Government of Romania Ion-Bogdan Bucur, Deputy Director, Communications and Public Relations Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Elena Buzarnescu, Expert, Labor Inspection, Ministry of Labor and Social Protection Cornelia-Maria Simion, Counselor-Director, Foreign Trade and International Relations Directorate, Government of Romania The first week of their program consisted of an orientation during which they met with individuals that represented a broad cross-section of the Washington, D.C. -based policy and opinion making community. During this portion of the program, the Romanian government officials were accompanied by eleven other professionals from Eastern Europe, consisting of journalists and representatives of government and non-governmental organizations. The program introduced the participants to federal and local governments, - 1 - national media, free-market institutions, and the NGO community in the U.S., while providing a forum for them to interact with American counterparts and with one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity Report 2013 Centre for European Studies
    activity 2013 report C E S www.thinkingeurope.eu CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN STUDIES Our C E S Team Credits Activity Report 2013 Centre for European Studies Editors: José Luis Fontalba, Hege van Dijke, Padraic Varley Publication Design: Andreas Neuhaus | PEPATO-GROUP Brussels, February 2014 Centre for European Studies Rue du Commerce 20 B-1000 Brussels The Centre for European Studies (CES) is the political foundation and think tank of the European People’s Party (EPP) dedicated to the promotion of Christian Democrat, conservative and like-minded political values. For more information please visit: www.thinkingeurope.eu This publication receives funding from the European Parliament. © Centre for European Studies 2014 Photos used in this publication: © Centre for European Studies 2014 The European Parliament assumes no responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication or their subsequent use. In Memoriam: Wilfried Martens On 9 October, Wilfried Martens, President of the Centre for European Studies (CES) and long-standing President of the European People’s Party (EPP), passed away at the age of 77. President Martens was a strong believer and promoter of political foundations, which he considered instrumental in advancing European integration and cooperation. Inspired by the role national foundations had played in their respective countries, he took an active role in founding the first centre-right political foundation at European level, the CES. President Martens was deeply committed and engaged in CES activities, not only as a strategic leader, but also as an inspirational speaker and author. His passion for the European project is evident in his autobiography Europe: I Struggle, I Overcome which offers the inside story on the intricacies of European politics, but above all its guiding ideas, values and principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Boc-Blaga: 26 La 20 in Lupta Pentru Sefia
    Scris de dana.conerth pe 14 martie 2011, 21:58 Boc-Blaga: 26 la 20 in lupta pentru sefia PDL Premierul Emil Boc este sustinut in lupta pentru sefia PDL de 26 de presedinti de organizatii judetene, iar Vasile Blaga de 20. PDL are 48 de organizatii si un candidat trebuie sa aiba sustinerea a minim 10 organizatii, scrie Mediafax. Boc si Blaga, in lupta pentru sefia partidului/opiniatimisoarei.ro Potrivit surselor, dupa sedinta BPN, Emil Boc si Vasile Blaga au mers in Aleea Modrogan, dar in sedii diferite ale PDL, fiecare la cabinetul sau. Cei doi au fost insotiti de sustinatori. Astfel, Emil Boc s-a aflat in cabinetul sau alaturi de Roberta Anastase, Anca Boagiu, Wiliam Branza, Teodor Stolojan. La randul sau, Vasile Blaga a stat in cabinetul aflat in alta cladire, alaturi de Sorin Frunzaverde, Cezar Preda, Cristian Boureanu si Adriean Videanu. Potrivit surselor citate, Ioan Oltean a semnat pentru sustinerea lui Emil Boc pentru presedintia partidului. De asemenea, sursele au precizat ca exista presedinti de organizatii care au semnat atat pe lista de sustinere a lui Blaga, cat si pe cea a lui Boc, cum este cazul presedintelui de organizatie Arges, Mircea Andrei. Potrivit surselor citate, Blaga a strans semnaturi de la 20 de presedinti de organizatii, dar si de la parlamentari si de la cinci organizatii PDL din Bucuresti, potrivit Mediafax. Sursele au mai spus ca motiunea lui Blaga este redactata de acesta si de Frunzaverde, urmand sa fie prezentat la sfarsitul acestei luni. Conventia Nationala pentru alegerea noii conduceri a partidului va avea loc in 14 mai.
    [Show full text]
  • Guvernul României
    BULETIN INFORMATIV D.S.G Luna martie 2011 surse AGERPRES CUPRINS COMUNICARE PUBLICĂ .................................................................................................. 6 Evenimente publice organizate de autorităţi ........................................................................ 6 Peste 50 de oraşe din România vor stinge luminile sâmbătă, alăturându-se campaniei Earth Hour .... 6 Alba: Jandarmii se alătură campaniei 'Ora Pământului' ......................................................................... 7 Covasna: 'Ora Pământului', marcată la Sfântu Gheorghe ..................................................................... 7 Jandarmeria Capitalei este partener în campania 'Ora Pământului 2011' ............................................. 8 Primarul general Sorin Oprescu va participa la 'Ora Pământului' .......................................................... 8 Ziua Mondială a Apei, la a 19-a aniversare ............................................................................................ 8 Ziua Mondială a Meteorologiei, sărbătorită la nivel global sub sloganul 'Clima şi noi' ......................... 10 Cluj: Instituirea titlului 'Clujean de onoare' pentru personalităţi care promovează judeţul ................... 10 Ziua Gărzii Naţionale de Mediu ............................................................................................................ 10 19 martie - Ziua Paşaportului Românesc ............................................................................................. 11 Manifestări
    [Show full text]
  • 21St EU-Romania Joint Parliamanetary Committee Meeting
    21st EU-Romania Joint Parliamanetary Committee Meeting 9 - 10 October 2006 Brussels Delegation from the Romanian Parliament Members of the delegation Chamber Position in the Political Committee for Group European Integration Mr. Viorel HREBENCIUC Chamber of Deputies Chairman PSD Ms. Silvia CIORNEI* Senate Vice-chairperson PC Ms. Monica IACOB RIDZI* Chamber of Deputies Vice-chairperson PD Mr. Dumitru Gheorghe Mircea COSEA* Chamber of Deputies Secretary PNL Mr. Vasile PUSCAS Chamber of Deputies Secretary PSD Mr. Cristian Mihai ADOMNITEI Chamber of Deputies Member PNL Ms. Roberta ANASTASE* Chamber of Deputies Member PD Mr. Alexandru ATHANASIU* Senate Member PSD Mr. Tiberiu BARBULETIU* Chamber of Deputies - PNL Non- Mr. Dumitru BECSENESCU* Chamber of Deputies Member attached Mr. Adrian Mihai CIOROIANU* Senate - PNL Mr. Titus CORLATEAN* Chamber of Deputies Member PSD Ms. Corina CRETU* Senate - PSD Ms. Gabriela CRETU* Chamber of Deputies - PSD Mr. Cristian CUCUIAN Senate Member PD Mr. Cristian DIACONESCU (2nd day only) Senate Member PSD Mr. Vasile DINCU* Senate - PSD Mr. Viorel Senior DUCA* Senate Member PRM Mr. Ovidiu GANT* Chamber of Deputies Member Minoritie s Mr. Vlad Gabriel HOGEA* Chamber of Deputies Member PRM Mr. Atilla Bella Ladislau KELEMEN* Chamber of Deputies - UDMR Mr. Sandor KONYA-HAMAR* Chamber of Deputies - UDMR Mr. Marian-Jean MARINESCU* Chamber of Deputies Member PD Mr. Eugen MIHAESCU* Senate Member PRM 5 Octoberber 2006 1 Mr. Dan MIHALACHE* Senate - PSD Ms. Viorica Georgeta Pompilia MOISIUC Senate Member PRM D.A. Mr. Alexandru Ioan MORTUN* Senate Member (PNL) Mr. Bogdan Nicolae NICULESCU- Chamber of Deputies Member PSD DUVAZ Mr. Ioan Mircea PASCU* Chamber of Deputies - PSD Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Ein Summer University Bucharest
    EIN SUMMER UNIVERSITY A Centre Right Answer to the Economic and Social Crisis : a Project for Europe 22 - 24 September 2011 BUCHAREST VADEMECUM of the Speakers Service Documentation - Publications Recherche EPP Group Group of the European People’s Party (Christian Democrats) in the European Parliament EN European Ideas Network 2 Vademecum of the speakers Vademecum of the speakers European Ideas Network 3 European Ideas Network 4 Vademecum of the speakers Roberta Alma ANASTASE Speaker of the Chamber of Deputies On December 19th, 2008, Roberta Anastase was elected Speaker of the Chamber of Deputies. She is the first woman to hold the office in the history of Romania. Prior to being elected, Ms. Anastase was a Member of Parliament, representing her home county of Prahova in the Chamber of Deputies. From 2005 to 2008, she was an observer, and then a Member of the European Parliament, affiliated with the European People’s Party – European Democrats Group. In November of 2008, under a new voting system, she was reelected as the first representative of the 11th electoral district of Prahova (Ploiesti-Vest) to the Chamber of Deputies. Ms. Anastase was born in Ploieşti on March 27th, 1976. A sociologist by training, she pursued post-graduate studies in Political Science and European Studies. Throughout her time as an MP and an MEP, Ms. Anastase has supported justice reform, women’s rights and equal opportunities. She was also European Parliament Rapporteur for the Black Sea Synergy and maintains a keen interest in foreign and regional affairs. Bogdan Lucian AURESCU A career diplomat, Bogdan Aurescu was appointed Secretary of State for Strategic Affairs in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on 4 February 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact-Finding Delegation of the Budgetary Control Committee to Romania 18 - 21 September 2006
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR COMMITTEES AND DELEGATIONS - COMMITTEE ON BUDGETARY CONTROL - Fact-finding delegation of the Budgetary Control Committee to Romania 18 - 21 September 2006 Preliminary Draft Programme, version 14 September 2006 Members of the delegation: Mr Herbert BÖSCH (PSE,Vice-Chairman), Mrs Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINEZ (EPP-ED), Mr Jan MULDER (ALDE, arriving on Tuesday), Mr°Paul van BUITENEN (Verts/ALE) CONT Secretariat Mr Christian EHLERS Staff of political groups Mr Hendrik PRUMMEL (Verts/ALE), Sylwia REMISZEWSKA (ALDE, arriving on Tuesday), Interpretaters: Mr Mihai Cristian CODREANU Ms Roxana-Cristina PETCU (team leader) Ms Corina Rodica ANGHEL Coordination in Bucharest Mr Jonathan SCHEELE, Head of Delegation Commission Delegation to Romania, Rue Jules Michelet 18-20, 010463 Bucharest tel.: 0040-21-203.54.00, fax.: 0040-21-230.24.53 [email protected], Mr Enrico D'AMBROGIO, Acting Head of Office European Parliament Information Office Strada Boteanu 1, Sector 1, 010027 Bucharest tel.: 0040-21-305.79.86, fax.: 0040-21-315.79.29 [email protected] 1 Coordination in the Embassy of Romania in Brussels: Anda SALAGEAN Marius SPIRIDON Romanian Mission to the EU Romanian Mission to the EU 12, rue Montoyer - 1000 Brussels 12, rue Montoyer - 1000 Brussels Tel.: +32-2-700 05 13 Tel: +32-2-700 03 16 Fax.: +32-2-700 06 41 Fax: +32-2-700 06 41 [email protected] Accommodation and transport in Romania InterContinental Bucharest Bv. Nicolae Balcescu 4 70122 Bucharest, Romania Tel.: Hotel Front Desk: +40-2-13102020 | Hotel Fax: +40-2-13120486 The delegation will have a minibus at its disposal for the duration of the visit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Institution of Presidential Impeachmnet in Semi-Presidential Systems
    THE INSTITUTION OF PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT IN SEMI-PRESIDENTIAL SYSTEMS -CASE STUDY OF ROMANIA- By Valentina-Andreea Dimulescu Submitted to Central European University Department of Political Science In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Political Science Supervisor: Professor Nenad Dimitrijevic Budapest, Hungary 2009 i ABSTRACT The present paper examines the institution of presidential impeachment in countries displaying a semi-presidential institutional design. More specifically, it addresses the question whether the functioning of impeachment can be attributed to the particular institutional arrangement mirrored in the specific interactions between the state actors involved – the president, parliament and PM – or by non-institutional factors such as the president’s actions throughout his/her tenure which can be considered as having violated the constitutional text. The methodology used is the case study of the 2007 Romanian presidential impeachment against Traian Băsescu. The principal finding is that it is difficult to point to a clear, mono- causal relationship between the tensions caused by semi-presidentialism and the practice of impeachment since the impeachment of the head of state is not a common practice in countries that display semi-presidential features. The Romanian case represents a situation where the ambiguity of the constitutional text permitted the parliamentary majority to sanction the President, whose self-proclaimed active role in the political system was supported by the Romanian Constitutional Court and by the citizens who participated in the referendum on his dismissal. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank Professor Nenad Dimitrijevic for the valuable guidance offered throughout the elaboration of the present paper.
    [Show full text]
  • „Băsescu Vs. Tăriceanu – Imaginea Celor Doi Lideri Politici În Presa Anului 2006”
    „Băsescu vs. Tăriceanu – imaginea celor doi lideri politici în presa anului 2006” Raport de analiza asupra mesajului presei 1 ianuarie – 1 decembrie 2006 I. Introducere Asociația Română de Marketing Politic a realizat un studiu comparativ C. P. Tăriceanu vs. T. Băsescu, un studiu asupra imaginii acestora. A fost luată în considerare imaginea, aşa cum a fost conturată în presa scrisă în 2006. Au fost luate în calcul perioada 1 ianuarie 2006 – 1 decembrie 2006 şi 7 din cele mai importante ziare naționale: Evenimentul Zilei, Jurnalul Național, Ziua, Cotidianul, România Liberă, Adevărul, Gândul. Metodă Călin P. Tăriceanu şi Traian Băsescu au primit pentru fiecare zi a anului, o notă pentru articolele în care apăreau. Au fost selectate cele mai bune şi cele mai proaste zile ale anului după acest criteriu („vârfurile” şi „gropile” de imagine) (între 20 şi 30 de zile). Au fost studiate evenimentele, temele, actorii şi modul ofensiv/defensiv în care cei doi actori au fost implicați în aceste zile. Proiectul Perioada de implementare, de lucru: 1 septembrie 2006 – 15 decembrie 2006 Au fost utilizate atât ziarele tipărite, cât şi sursele online, site‐urile ziarelor. Echipa de lucru: Este formată din experți în analiză media şi analiză politică, implicați ca volutari în proiectul ARMP ‐ Agenția de Rating Politic. Agenția de Rating Politic, ca proiect ARMP, îşi propune să realizeze periodic studii prin care să promoveze conceptele de marketing politic şi să participe la dezbaterile publice cu viziunea şi ideile sale. Echipa: Andrei C. Vlad, Ionut Butoi, Florin Baciu, Andrei Pop; coordonare: Cristian Andrei. Perspective Au fost realizate şi alte culegeri de date pe perioada respectivă pentru alte studii care au fost sau vor fi făcute publice.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union: a Regional International Society from the Point of View of the Romanian Governmental Elites
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN AFFAIRS Vol. 14, No. 3, September 2014 The European Union: a Regional International Society from the Point of View of the Romanian Governmental Elites Adriana Seagle* Abstract**: This article investigates how Romanian governmental elites conceptualize the European Union as an international society using the English School approach. The argument advanced in the article is that the EU is conceptualized as a society of states divided between a solidarist core and a fragmented periphery. New members must acquaint themselves first with a certain code of conduct and adhere to a certain system of values in order to achieve a movement into the core. Keywords: European Union, Romanian governmental elites, international society, solidarist, pluralist 1. Introduction The European Union (EU) is an experiment in flux aiming at creating solidarity or a union in which states agree to share a common standard of civilization reflected by common interests, values, rules and a framework of common institutions. To what extent do newly accepted members understand the Union’s common interests, values and rules before they participate in the creation of common institutions? What meanings do they attach to the Union’s common interests, rules and values? Existing studies involving testimonies of key decision makers in Romania and the EU reveal that some Romanian political elites perceived membership in the EU as a way of “acquiring greater legitimacy, new sources of wealth, and increased political influence.”1 * Adriana Seagle is Adjunct Professor at the Department of Political Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA. Her research interests focus on the English School, the evolution of sub-global regional international societies, intelligence practices within military alliances, European security and foreign policies with emphasis on Romania and the Balkan region.
    [Show full text]