Fact-Finding Delegation of the Budgetary Control Committee to Romania 18 - 21 September 2006

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fact-Finding Delegation of the Budgetary Control Committee to Romania 18 - 21 September 2006 DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR COMMITTEES AND DELEGATIONS - COMMITTEE ON BUDGETARY CONTROL - Fact-finding delegation of the Budgetary Control Committee to Romania 18 - 21 September 2006 Preliminary Draft Programme, version 14 September 2006 Members of the delegation: Mr Herbert BÖSCH (PSE,Vice-Chairman), Mrs Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINEZ (EPP-ED), Mr Jan MULDER (ALDE, arriving on Tuesday), Mr°Paul van BUITENEN (Verts/ALE) CONT Secretariat Mr Christian EHLERS Staff of political groups Mr Hendrik PRUMMEL (Verts/ALE), Sylwia REMISZEWSKA (ALDE, arriving on Tuesday), Interpretaters: Mr Mihai Cristian CODREANU Ms Roxana-Cristina PETCU (team leader) Ms Corina Rodica ANGHEL Coordination in Bucharest Mr Jonathan SCHEELE, Head of Delegation Commission Delegation to Romania, Rue Jules Michelet 18-20, 010463 Bucharest tel.: 0040-21-203.54.00, fax.: 0040-21-230.24.53 [email protected], Mr Enrico D'AMBROGIO, Acting Head of Office European Parliament Information Office Strada Boteanu 1, Sector 1, 010027 Bucharest tel.: 0040-21-305.79.86, fax.: 0040-21-315.79.29 [email protected] 1 Coordination in the Embassy of Romania in Brussels: Anda SALAGEAN Marius SPIRIDON Romanian Mission to the EU Romanian Mission to the EU 12, rue Montoyer - 1000 Brussels 12, rue Montoyer - 1000 Brussels Tel.: +32-2-700 05 13 Tel: +32-2-700 03 16 Fax.: +32-2-700 06 41 Fax: +32-2-700 06 41 [email protected] Accommodation and transport in Romania InterContinental Bucharest Bv. Nicolae Balcescu 4 70122 Bucharest, Romania Tel.: Hotel Front Desk: +40-2-13102020 | Hotel Fax: +40-2-13120486 The delegation will have a minibus at its disposal for the duration of the visit. Flight arrangements Herbert BÖSCH, MEP, Head of the Delegation OS 562 Zurich-Vienna, OS 791 Vienna-Bucharest arrival 16.25 h LX 1885 Bucharest-Zurich departure 14.15 h Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, MEP SN 5209 Brussels-Bucharest arrival 00.15 h OS 790 Bucharest-Vienna departure 11.30 h Jan MULDER, MEP LH 233 Berlin-Munich, LH3422 Munich-Bucharest (Tuesday) arrival 23.59 h LH 3425 Bucharest-Munich, LH 4608 Munich-Brussels, (Friday) departure 12.50 h Paul VAN BUITENEN, MEP TAROM RO 602 Timisoara-Bucharest arrival 11.50 h SN 5208/TAROM RO 0373 Bucharest-Brussels departure 17.55 h Christian EHLERS LH 4603 Bussels-Munich, LH 3420 Munich-Bucharest, arrival: 16.40 h LH 3425 Bucharest-Munich, LH 4608 Munich-Brussels departure 12.50 h Hendrik PRUMEL SN 5205 Brussels-Bucharest arrival 13.55 h SN 5208 Bucharest-Brussels departure 17.55 h Sywia REMISZEWSKA LH 233 Berlin-Munich, LH3422 Munich-Bucharest (Tuesday) arrival 23.59 h LH 3425 Bucharest-Munich, LH 4608 Munich-Brussels departure 12.50 h 2 Monday, 18 September 2006 All day Individual arrival of the Members of the Delegation in Bucharest Members will be welcomed in the airport and picked up by minibus (not possible for late arrivals!) 17.45 h Departure from the hotel to the Commission Delegation 18.00 h Meeting with the Delegations of the European Parliament and the Commission Mr. Jonathan SCHEELE, Head of the European Commission Delegation1 Mr Enrico D'AMBROGIO, Acting Head of the EP Information Office Venue: Commission Delegation, Rue Jules Michelet 18-20, 010463 Bucharest, tel.: 0040-21-203.54.00, fax.: 0040-21-230.24.53 Tuesday, 19 September 2006 9.00 h Departure from the hotel 9.30 h Ministry of Public Finance Mrs. Doina DASCALU, Secretary of State2 National Authority for Public Procurement Mr. Alexandru COJOCARU, President Venue: Ministry of Public Finance, Apolodor 17, Bucharest 1 JW – Mr. Johan WELTEN, Financial Officer; MR – Mr. Mark RYCHNOVSKY, Task Manager; ECF - Mr. Esteban CASTRO FERNADEZ, OLAF Assistant; AR – Mrs. Aura RADUCU, Coordination and Reporting Team Leader; CS – Mrs. Camelia SUICA, JHA Team Leader; CL – Mrs. Carmen LEPSA, Financial Officer Assistant; AG – Mrs. Anca GRIU, Task Manager; DT – Mr. Dragos TUDORACHE, Task Manager; MA - Mrs. Mioara AVASILICHIOAEI, Task Manager; CD – Mr. Cyril DEWALEYNE, Task Manager 2 in attendance: Mrs. Lenuta STEFANESCU, Deputy General Director, tel no: +40-21-3199858; Mr. Eugen TEDOROVICI, General Director, tel no: +40-21-3025300; Mr. Stefan CIOBANU, Director, tel no: +40-21- 3025230; Mrs. Daniela GHEORGHE, Director General, tel. no: +40-21-3268732; Mrs. Cornelia NOGHI, Head of Unit, tel. no: +40-21-3025381; Mr. Razvan COTOVELEA, General Director, tel. no: +40-21-3025200 3 10.30 h Ministry of Public Finance Representatives of the following Ministries responsible for Operational Programmes (OP): Mrs. Steluta GOANTA, Director General, Ministry of Economy and Trade, tel. no: +40-21-2025270 Mr. Attila KORODY, Secretary of State, Ministry of Environment and Water Management, tel. no: +40-21-3166057 Mrs. Florentina TEODOROVICI, Director General, Ministry of Transport, Construction and Tourism, tel. no: +40-21-3196127 Mr. Gabriel FRIPTU, Director General, Ministry of European Integration, tel. no: +40-21-3114183 Mr. Valer BINDEA, Secretary of State, Ministry of Labour, Social Solidarity and Family, tel no: +40-21-3125268 Mr. Danut APETREI, Secretary of State, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development, tel. no: +40-21-3072329 Mrs. Cornelia HARABAGIU, Director General, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development, tel. no: +40-21-3078640 Mr. Dan GHERGHELAS, Deputy Director, The Agency for Rural Development and Fisheries, tel. no: +40-21-4022779 Mrs. Mariana DRAGHICI, Deputy Director, Paying and Intervention Agency for Agriculture, tel. no: +40-21-3054814 Venue: Ministry of Public Finance, Apolodor 17, Bucharest 12.30 h - 14.30 Free Time 15.00 h Ministry of Justice Mrs. Monica MACOVEI, Minister Venue: Ministry of Justice, Libertatii 16, Bucharest 16.30 h Court of Auditors Mr. Dan Drosu SAGUNA, President1, tel. no: +40-21-3078818 Venue: Court of Auditors Lev Tolstoi 22-24, Bucharest 18.00 h DLAF (Anti-Fraud Department) Mr. Tudor CHIUARIU, Secretary of State, tel. no: +40-21-3181185 Venue: Victoria Palace, P-ta Victoriei 1, Bucharest 20.00 h Dinner offered by Mr Herbert BÖSCH, Deputy Chairman, on behalf of the European Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control Venue: Casa Vernescu, Calea Victoriei 133, Bucharest, tel.: +40-213119744 1 in attendance: Mr. Patru ROTARU, Accounts Counsellor, tel. no: +40-21-3078717 4 Wednesday, 20 September 2006 9.00 h Departure from hotel (all day visit) 1. High Court of Cassation and Justice – Functioning of the CDMS Venue: Batistei 25, Bucharest, tel.: +40-21-3103908 2. ISPA - Bucharest-Constanta (Cernavoda) Motorway - construction and rehabilitation of sections 4 and 5 Venue: road to Calarasi 3. Rehabilitation of the water supply system in Calarasi - Pilot SAMTID Project (RO 2002/000-586.05.02.03.02.04) Venue: Calarasi 4. PHARE: CBC Romania-Bulgaria: Border Crossing between Calarasi and Silistra Venue: Calarasi 5. SAPARD project - Modernization of the Vegetable Greenhouse and of the Seed Greenhouse – SC PREFAB SA Calarasi Venue: Calarasi 6. Closure of Cuore and Speranta placement centres (social project) Venue: Calasari 18.00 h Ministry of European Integration Mrs. Anca BOAGIU, Minister Venue: Ministry of European Integration, Apolodor 17, Bucharest, tel.: +40-21-3011502 Thursday, 21 September 2006 08.30 h Romanian Parliament Mr. Mihai TANASECU, Chairperson of the Committee for Budget, Finance and Banks, Chamber of Deputies Mr. Varujan VOSGANIAN, Chairperson of the Committee for Budget, Finance and Banks, Senate Venue: Parliament Palace 09.30 h Press Conference Venue: Commission Delegation, Rue Jules Michelet 18-20, 010463 Bucharest, tel.: 0040-21-203.54.00, fax.: 0040-21-230.24.53 5.
Recommended publications
  • Budapest to Bucharest Danube River Cruise
    BUDAPEST TO BUCHAREST DANUBE Program Guide RIVER CRUISE August 20-29, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Before You Go ....................................................... 3-4 Getting There ......................................................... 5-6 Program Information .............................................. 7-9 Omissions Waiver .................................................. 9 Amenities & Services ............................................. 10-12 Frequently Asked Questions .................................. 13-14 Itinerary .................................................................. 15-16 BEFORE YOU GO PERSONAL TRAVEL DOCUMENTS Passport: A passport that is valid for at least six (6) months after your return date is required for this program. Visas: U.S. and Canadian citizens do not need visas for countries visited. Other nationalities should consult the local embassies or consulates for visa requirements. All documentation required for this itinerary is the sole responsibility of the guest. Brand g will not be responsible for advising and/or obtaining required travel documentation for any passenger, or for any delays, damages, and/or losses, including missed portions of your trip, related to improper or absent travel documentation. It is suggested that copies of important documents, including your passport and visas, be kept in a separate place, in case the originals are lost or stolen. Travel Protection: While travel insurance is not required to participate in this program, Brand g strongly recommends that each guest purchase
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Corruption with Con Tricks: Romania's Assault On
    FIGHTING CORRUPTION WITH CON TRICKS: ROMANIA’S ASSAULT ON THE RULE OF LAW David Clark FIGHTING CORRUPTION WITH CON TRICKS FIGHTING CORRUPTION WITH CON TRICKS: ROMANIA’S ASSAULT ON THE RULE OF LAW 2 FIGHTING CORRUPTION WITH CON TRICKS Executive Summary Democracy in Europe is facing its greatest challenge since the fall of the Berlin Wall. The threat comes not only from the rise of political movements that openly reject liberal democratic values, including the governing parties of Hungary and Poland, but also from the risk of creeping authoritarianism caused by a gradual decline in standards of governance and the weakening of important democratic underpinnings, such as the rule of law. Romania is a country of particular concern. Although it has earned international praise for its recent efforts to stamp out corruption, a detailed examination of Romania’s anti-corruption activities shows that they often provide convenient cover for acts of political score settling and serious human rights violations. The methods used show a considerable degree of continuity with the practices and attitudes of the communist era. The strong correlation between those targeted for prosecution and the interests of those in power is indicative of politicised justice. Cases have often been accompanied by campaigns of public vilification designed to maximise their political impact. Far from being above politics, Romania’s National Anti-corruption Directorate (DNA) is an active participant in its partisan struggles. Although the rule of law requires the justice system to work independently of government, there is clear evidence of collusion between prosecutors and the executive in Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • On Romanian Political Nicknames
    ÀÍÒÐÎÏÎÍÈÌÈß GIOROCEANU, Alina (Craiova, Romania) ON ROMANIAN POLITICAL NICKNAMES Çà ïðîçâèùàòà íà ðóìúíñêèòå ïîëèòèöè On Romanian Political Nicknames The nickname which is given to a person and is initially used by a small group of people turns into a byname as the person becomes more popular in society. The byname contains indications about the individuality or the public image of its carrier. There is also a connection with the physical and psychic features of the person or to activities or events connected with him or her. On the political scene (the Romanian political scene is no exception) a byname is used as a weapon for disctediting or demonizing political oppo- nents. Linguistic analysis of bynames of Romanian politicians shows the variety of linguistic resources and means used in the creation of a byname such as contraction, composition, derivation and abbreviation. Keywords: nickname, byname, politics, truncation, composition, derivation, ab- breviation O poreclã, atribuitã unei persoane ºi utilizatã, la început, în colectivitãþi mai mici, odatã ce intrã în conºtiinþa publicã devine supranume. Supranumele capteazã indicii despre personalitatea sau imaginea/percepþia publicã a posesorului. Dincolo de nume, existã legãturi cu trãsãturile fizice sau psihice ale persoanei sau cu o acþiune/întâmplare a acesteia. Pe scena politicã (scena politicã româneascã nu face excepþie!), supranumele este folosit ca armã pentru discreditarea sau demonizarea oponenþilor politici. Analiza lingvisticã a supranumelor din politica româneascã va scoate în evidenþã varietatea resurselor ºi mijloacelor limbii utilizate în atribuirea unui supranume (trunchierea, compunerea, derivarea, abrevierea). A name given to someone by few people, once become public knowledge, is often used instead of the person’s formal name.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Corruption Policies Revisited Computer Assiste
    EU Grant Agreement number: 290529 Project acronym: ANTICORRP Project title: Anti-Corruption Policies Revisited Work Package: WP 6 Media and corruption Title of deliverable: D 6.1 Extensive content analysis study on the coverage of stories on corruption Computer Assisted Content Analysis of the print press coverage of corruption In Romania Due date of deliverable: 30 June, 2016 Actual submission date: 30 June, 2016 Authors: Natalia Milewski , Valentina Dimulescu (SAR) Organization name of lead beneficiary for this deliverable: UNIPG, UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI PERUGIA Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme Dissemination level PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) Co Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) The information and views set out in this publication are those of the author(s) only and do not reflect any collective opinion of the ANTICORRP consortium, nor do they reflect the official opinion of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the European Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. 1 CONTENTS 1. The Analysed Media p. 3 2. Most used keywords p.4 3. Most frequent words p.5 4. Word associations p. 13 5. Evolution over time p. 25 6. Differences among the observed newspapers p. 29 7. Remarks on the influence that the political, judicial and socio-cultural systems have on p. 33 the manner in which corruption is portrayed in Romanian media 8.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION in ROMANIA 2Nd and 16Th November 2014
    PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN ROMANIA 2nd and 16th November 2014 European Elections monitor Prime Minister Victor Ponta and Klaus Johannis will face each other on 16th November in the Corinne Deloy second round of voting that might be tighter than expected Results Abstract : 1st round Prime Minister and Chairman of the Social Democratic Party (PSD), Victor Ponta came out ahead in the first round of the presidential election that took place on 2nd November in Romania. The head of government won 40.33% of the vote and came out ahead of Klaus Sibiu (National-Liberal Party, PNL), Mayor of Sibiu and member of the Democratic Forum of the Germans of Romania (FDGR), who won 30.44% of the vote. He is supported by the Christian Liberal Alliance (Alianta Crestin Liberal, ACL), the alliance of the National-Liberal Party (PNL) and the Democratic Liberal Party (PD-L). The leader of the Senate and former Prime Minister and division,” declared Prime Minister Ponta accusing, (2004-2008) Calin Popescu-Tariceanu (Liberal but not naming the outgoing president of the Republic Reformist Party) came third in the presidential election Traian Basescu, with whom he has experienced a with nearly 6% of the vote. He was followed by Elena difficult period of cohabitation. “After 10 years of Udrea (People’s Movement), former Regional and conflict and destruction the time for reconstruction has Tourism Minister (2009-2012) who was supported by come,” he again stressed. the outgoing President of the Republic Traian Basescu winning around 5% of the vote. Then came MEP and “I am confident that 25 years after the fall of the former Justice Minister (2004-2007) Monica Macovei, communist regime we can finally bring transition to an member of the Liberal Democratic Party (PD-L) who end so that Romania will become a truly democratic, was standing as an independent candidate (4% of the European country,” indicated the head of government vote).
    [Show full text]
  • De La Monosemie La Polisemie În Terminologia Stiintifica
    UNIVERSITATEA DIN BUCURE ŞTI DE LA MONOSEMIE LA POLISEMIE ÎN TERMINOLOGIA ŞTIIN łIFIC Ă ACTUAL Ă Tez ă de doctorat CONDUC ĂTOR ŞTIIN łIFIC prof. univ. dr. Angela Bidu – Vr ănceanu AUTORUL Monica – Mihaela Rizea BUCURE ŞTI 2009 CUPRINS PARTEA I PERSPECTIVE TEORETICE ŞI PRINCIPII DE ANALIZ Ă Cuvânt înainte 1. Parcurs teoretic în terminologie – de la monosemie, la polisemie................16 1.1. Dou ă abord ări distincte – terminologia intern ă vs. terminologia extern ă....16 1.1.1. Terminologia intern ă sau terminologia propriu-zis ă..........................17 1.1.1.1. Considera Ńii generale.............................................................17 1.1.1.2. O perspectiv ă asupra termenului – termenul-concept sau termenul-etichet ă...................................................................21 1.1.2. Terminologia extern ă sau terminologia din perspectiv ă lingvistic ă..26 1.1.2.1. Considera Ńii generale.............................................................26 1.1.2.2. Direc Ńii teoretice....................................................................27 1.1.2.3. Termenul ca termen-lexem....................................................28 1.2. Terminologia intern ă şi terminologia extern ă - teorii în complementaritate...........................................................................33 2. Polisemia din perspectiva terminologiei externe.............................................52 2.1. Considera Ńii generale.....................................................................................52 2.2. Tipuri
    [Show full text]
  • Ambassade De France En Roumanie Revue Des Médias
    AMBASSADE DE FRANCE EN ROUMANIE REVUE DES MÉDIAS ROUMAINS DU 18 MARS 2013 Les gros titres de l’actualité Presse écrite « Klaus IOHANNIS critique de manière voilée la politique d’Angela MERKEL vis-à-vis de la Roumanie : l’Allemagne n’aurait pas dû nous rejeter publiquement » (interview ADEVARUL - à la une ) « Le manuel d’histoire des Sicules (minorité hongroise de Roumanie), écrit à Budapest », l’historien PAL-ANTAL Sandor, membre de l’Académie de Budapest, affirme que le livre ne contient pas d’information erronées (ADEVARUL) Interview de Monica MACOVEI : « Je suis persuadée que BLAGA n’est pas à même de mener une politique d’opposition combative » (EVENIMENTUL ZILEI à la une) « Mihai Razvan UNGUREANU et PAVELESCU veulent ressusciter l’alliance DA », le leader du parti Force civique et celui du parti paysan pensent que l’électorat a la nostalgie de l’alliance Dreptate si Adevar (justice et vérité) (vecteur qui a porté le PDL au pouvoir en 2004) ( EVENIMENTUL ZILEI ) « Le bouclier antimissile reste en Roumanie », l’administration américaine apaise les craintes de la Russie mais annule la 4 ème phase de la Défense Antimissile ( ROMANIA LIBERA à la une ), « Le bouclier européen modifié au gré de la Russie », les Etats-Unis abandonneront une phase du système de défense antimissile européen et augmenteront le nombre d’intercepteurs d’Alaska et de Californie ( EVENIMENTUL ZILEI ) « Le cours préparatoire, en débat public »,( ROMANIA LIBERA ) « PONTA veut une nouvelle loi sur les restitutions des propriétés avant de procéder à l’évaluation des dizaines de milliers des dossiers oubliés dans les mairies ».
    [Show full text]
  • SAINT PETERSBURG AEC Annual Congress 2012 and General Assembly
    SAINT PETERSBURG AEC Annual Congress 2012 and General Assembly 1 AEC Pop and Jazz Platform! Lille 2012 1 With the support of: www.asimut.com The AEC would also like to express deep gratitude to the Rector of the St Petersburg State Conservatory Mikhail Gantvarg, and his team composed of Dmitry Chasovitin, Anna Opochinskaya , Regina Glazunova, Vladislav Norkin and Arina Shvarenok for their support in organizing the AEC Annual Congress and General Assembly 2012 in St Petersburg. The AEC team would also like to express special thanks to the members of the AEC Congress Committee: Hubert Eiholzer (Chair), John Wallace and Eirik Birkeland, for preparing and organising the Thematic Day of the Congress. 2 3 Table of Contents Programme ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Music Introductions ..................................................................................................................... 12 Concert Programme ..................................................................................................................... 12 AEC Thematic Day on Artistic Integrity ................................................................................. 14 Part I: Plenary Sessions .......................................................................................................................... 14 Part II: Parallel Breakout Sessions ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sondaj Privind Situaţia Politică Secțional Prezidențiale, 17-26 Noiembrie 2014
    Sondaj privind situaţia politică Secțional Prezidențiale, 17-26 noiembrie 2014 Bună dimineaţa / bună ziua / bună seara, mă numesc ... şi sunt operator de interviu la CSOP. Împreună cu Universitatea COD DOSAR „Babeş-Bolyai” din Cluj-Napoca suntem implicaţi într-o ESANT. Acest respondent face parte din...? cercetare internaţională la care participă şi România. Am dori Eşantionul de bază (primii 10 selectați) 1 să cunoaştem părerile oamenilor în legătură cu diverse lucruri: nivelul de trai, lucrurile care îi interesează, viaţa Eşantionul de rezerve 2 politică şi economică din România şi alegerile prezidențiale. SEL. Selecţia acestui subiect a fost făcută... Pentru a discuta aceste aspecte, dumneavoastră aţi fost ales din listele electorale 1 la întâmplare, ca într-o loterie. Dacă sunteţi de acord să ne răspundeţi la întrebări, sperăm să nu vă răpim mai mult de din alte liste, în afară de cele electorale 2 30-40 de minute. Răspunsurile pe care le vom obţine nu le prin metoda drumului aleator 3 vom comunica nimănui în această formă. Ne interesează doar numărarea persoanelor care au o părere sau alta. INTRODUCERE Data interviului: ZZ LL AAAA Limba de administrare: 1. Română 2. Maghiară 3. Alta Vă rugăm să ne spuneţi cât de importante sunt Foarte Destul de Puţin Deloc NS NR următoarele lucruri în viaţa dvs. important important important important A1. Familia 1 2 3 4 88 99 A2. Prietenii 1 2 3 4 88 99 A3 Timpul liber 1 2 3 4 88 99 A4. Politica 1 2 3 4 88 99 A5. Munca 1 2 3 4 88 99 A6. Religia 1 2 3 4 88 99 D1.
    [Show full text]
  • Espon “Siesta” Project: Second Workshop with Regional Stakeholders in Bucharest
    ESPON “SIESTA” PROJECT: SECOND WORKSHOP WITH REGIONAL STAKEHOLDERS IN BUCHAREST The Management Team of the Siesta project , in collaboration with the research group of CICADIT (Interdisciplinary Centre for Advanced Research on Territorial Dynamics of the University of Bucharest), is organizing the Second Workshop with Regional Stakeholders . The event will take place on the next 25 of June in Bucharest , in the building of the Ministry for Regional Development and Tourism. SIESTA - Spatial Indicators for a “Europe 2020 Strategy Territorial Analysis (www.siestaproject.eu ) is a project financed by the European Union in the framework of ESPON, the European Observation Network for Territorial Development and Cohesion (www.espon.eu ) . The project is leaded by the University of Santiago de Compostela (Spain) and involves other seven academic and research partners coming from six different European countries: France, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Poland and Romania.. The main aim of ESPON Programme is to support policy development in relation to the territorial cohesion and a harmonious development of the European territory. It finances, among others, applied research on different themes of European territorial dynamics, in order to assess strength and weaknesses of regions and cities and provide scientifically solid facts and evidence at that level. The specific objective of SIESTA project is to provide evidence on the territorial dimension of the “EU2020 Strategy” , by identifying opportunities for different types of regions in relation to the targets and flagship initiatives set out in the Strategy. The results of this ESPON project are intended to be useful for policy makers at various scales (especially at regional and local level) in the process of planning and identifying territorial interventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Partidul Naţional Liberal – P.N.L
    18.03.2003 – PARTIDUL NAŢIONAL LIBERAL – P.N.L. Actuala denumire a partidului este PNL –prin comasarea prin absorbţie de către PARTIDUL NAŢIONAL LIBERAL a Partidului ACŢIUNEA POPULARĂ - Sentinţa civilă nr. 15/F/ 19.05.2008 a T.B. - Secţia a V-a Civilă în dosarul 16303/3/2008. RADIAT conform Sentinţei Civile nr.1127 pronunţată de Tribunalul Bucureşti – Secţia a IV-a Civilă în dosarul nr. 26874/3/2014, în şedinţa publică de la data de 06.10.2014 şi a Deciziei Civile nr. 551A pronunţată de Curtea de Apel Bucureşti – Secţia a III-a Civilă şi pentru Cauze cu Minori şi de Familie în dosarul nr. 26874/3/2014 (2406/2014), în şedinţa publică de la data de 09.12.2014. Decizia civilă 3/17.02.2003 – Tribunalul Bucureşti – Secţia a III-a Civilă – Dosar 1/P/2003 – rămasă definitivă prin necontestare. Sediul central este în Bucureşti, Bd.Aviatorilor nr.86, sector 1. Preşedinte – Theodor Stolojan; Vicepreşedinţi: Teodor Meleşcanu; Gheorghe Flutur; Monica Octavia Muscă; Paul Păcuraru; Călin Popescu Tăriceanu - Modificări: (1.09.2003) – Decizia civilă nr.9/13.05.2003 a T.B.-Secţia a III-a Civilă în dosarul 7/P/2003 – comasarea prin absorbţie a Uniunii Forţelor de Dreapta de către Partidul Naţional Liberal; radierea U.F.D. din Registrul partidelor politice; rămasă definitivă prin decizia civilă nr.1774/22.07.2003 a Curţii de Apel Bucureşti – Secţia a III-a Civilă în dosarul nr.1980/2003. - Modificări: (27.11.2003) – decizia civilă nr.39/20.10.2003 – T.B.-Secţia a IV-a Civilă – dosar 42/PARTID/2003, definitivă prin necontestare – dispune înregistrarea modificărilor privind statutul Partidului Naţional Liberal şi a modificărilor în structura de conducere ale partidului determinate de comasarea prin absorbţie a P.N.L.-C.
    [Show full text]
  • 1100903 [2011] RRTA 323 (3 May 2011)
    1100903 [2011] RRTA 323 (3 May 2011) DECISION RECORD RRT CASE NUMBER: 1100903 DIAC REFERENCE(S): CLF2010/129628 COUNTRY OF REFERENCE: Romania TRIBUNAL MEMBER: Paul Fisher DATE: 3 May 2011 PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne DECISION: The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Protection (Class XA) visa. STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS APPLICATION FOR REVIEW 1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship to refuse to grant the applicant a Protection (Class XA) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). 2. The applicant, who claims to be a dual citizen of Romania and Moldova, arrived in Australia on [date deleted under s.431(2) of the Migration Act 1958 as this information may identify the applicant] August 2010 and applied to the Department of Immigration and Citizenship for a Protection (Class XA) visa [in] September 2010. The delegate decided to refuse to grant the visa [in] December 2010 and notified the applicant of the decision and his review rights by letter [on the same date]. 3. The delegate refused the visa application on the basis that the applicant is not a person to whom Australia has protection obligations under the Refugees Convention 4. The applicant applied to the Tribunal [in] February 2011 for review of the delegate’s decision. 5. The Tribunal finds that the delegate’s decision is an RRT-reviewable decision under s.411(1)(c) of the Act. The Tribunal finds that the applicant has made a valid application for review under s.412 of the Act.
    [Show full text]