DOCSLIB.ORG

European Integration and Foreign Policy in Central and Eastern Europe: the Cases of Hungary, Slovakia and Romania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Integration and Foreign Policy in Central and Eastern Europe: the Cases of Hungary, Slovakia and Romania EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND FOREIGN POLICY IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: THE CASES OF HUNGARY, SLOVAKIA AND ROMANIA by SORIN !TEFAN DENCA A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Russian and East European Studies School of Government and Society College of Social Sciences The University of Birmingham August 2010 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis examines the impact of Europeanization on the foreign policy of the new member states of the European Union, using as case studies Hungary, Slovakia and Romania. It asks what the extent of Europeanization of foreign policy is and whether and to what extent there has been divergence in the way in which the new member states have responded to the similar constraints and opportunities of the European integration. Insofar as divergence can be identified, a third research question asks why there is policy divergence. It argues that the governmental politics and the politics of national identity play a key role as mediating factors for the Europeanization of the system of policy making, the process of elite socialization and the conduct of foreign policy itself. Three critical international events are used as sub-case studies in order to asses the extent of Europeanization of foreign policy of the CEE counties: the US-led war in Iraq in 2003, the NATO airstrikes against Yugoslavia in 1999 and the Kosovo declaration of independence in 2008. The study’s findings suggest that the pressures of Europeanization leads to convergence in some policy areas, but domestic factors such as governmental and national identity politics offer a more convincing explanation of divergence. Overall, Europeanization is uneven not only across issue-areas, but also across countries. The limits of convergence as an outcome of Europeanization and the persistence of diversity are therefore best accounted for by the diversity of domestic factors. i Acknowledgements I am grateful to my supervisors, Dr. Derek Averre and Dr. Nathaniel Copsey for their patient guidance, permanent support and advice, without which this thesis could not have been completed. I am thankful not only for the academic direction, but also for their friendship. I am grateful to all the public officials and policy experts from Hungary, Slovakia and Romania who gave up their time and shared with me their thoughts, providing the most valuable material of this study. While I am tremendously thankful to all of them, I would like to show my appreciation to Dr. Péter Balázs,, Dr. Eduard Kukan and Dr. Vasile Pu!ca! for their time and extremely interesting discussion we had in Budapest, Bratislava and Cluj- Napoca. This research project, including the extensive fieldwork in Brussels, Bratislava, Bucharest and Budapest, would not have been possible without the generous funding granted by the Romanian Government Special Scholarship, the University Association for Contemporary European Studies, the University of Birmingham, the National Scholarship Programme of the Slovak Republic, the Open Society Institute and the Ratiu Family Foundation in London. The Institute of European Studies and International Relations of the Comenius University in Bratislava offered the institutional support during the research fieldwork in Slovakia. I would like to extend my gratitude to Prof. Silvia Mihalikova and Andrej Findor for their helpful and amiable support. I thank the Slovak Foreign Policy Association in Bratislava for allowing me to carry on my work in the library and to access the library resources. I extend my thanks to András Rácz and Zoltan Kantor of the Hungarian Institute of International Affairs for the enriching discussion we had in Budapest. I would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers to the articles I published in the Journal of Contemporary European Research in 2009 for their thoughtful comments which helped me to extend and adjust some of the arguments of this thesis. I benefited greatly from the comments to the presentation of the partial results of my research to the Romanian and Moldovan Studies Research Group at University College London, School of Slavonic and East European Studies, UACES Annual Conference in Edinburgh in 2008, and EUSA Biennial Conference in Los Angles in 2009. I extend my thanks to Dr. Tim Haughton from the University of Birmingham for his general support throughout the years. For their useful comments, I would also like to thank Dr. Liliana Pop from London Metropolitan University, Dr. Oana Mocanu from the European Institute of Romania and Dr. Lisbeth Aggestam from the University of Bath. I am grateful to all people who provided me with moral, intellectual or other type of support while undertaking this research, I show my greatest appreciation to Patricia Carr, Marea Areas and Veta Douglas, the invaluable administrative staff of the European Research Institute and the Centre for Russian and East European Studies for their constant support and kindness. The University of Birmingham provided an excellent setting not only for developing good quality research, but also for interacting with other doctoral students, research fellows, visiting scholars. During the years, the programmes of conferences and seminars run by the European Research Institute, Centre for Russian and East European Studies and the Department of Political Sciences and International Studies offered a prolific environment of keeping track with new research, exchanging ideas and learning. On a personal note, I would like to thank my wife Irina for her constant moral support and my daughter Diana, whose joyful character helped me forget the hardships of all kind ii encountered during the years of conducting this research. I dedicate this work to my second daughter, Maria, who came to the world at the time of defending this thesis. iii Table of contents Ch. Title Page Abstract i Acknowledgements ii Table of Content iv List of abbreviations vi List of tables, illustrations and maps ix 1. Introduction 1 2. Europeanization of Foreign Policy: A Literature Review 2.1. Introduction………………………………………………………………... 16 2.2. Literature on the Europeanization of foreign policy………………………. 17 2.3. The literature on the domestic impact of European integration in Hungary, Slovakia and Romania………………………………………………………….. 22 2.4. Conclusions………………………………………………………………... 28 3. Institutions, Identities and Interests: A Systemic Framework for Studying the Europeanization of Foreign Policy 3.1. Introduction………………………………………………………………... 31 3.2. Europeanization of foreign policy between foreign policy analysis and theories of European integration……………………………………………….. 33 i) Europeanization of Foreign Policy and International Relations………... 35 ii) Europeanization of foreign policy and the study of European integration…………………………………………………………………. 38 3.3. Europeanization of foreign policy: a systems approach…………………… 48 3.4. Three Dimensions of Europeanization…………………………………….. 56 i) Europeanization as institutional change………………………………… 56 ii) Europeanization as socialization of identities and interests……………. 60 iii) Europeanization of foreign policy action……………………………… 65 3.5. Summary…………………………………………………………………... 68 4. Linking Theory to Empirical Data 4.1. Research Strategy………………………………………………………….. 69 4.2. Research Design…………………………………………………………… 79 4.3. Methods and data collection……………………………………………….. 82 4.4. Summary…………………………………………………………………... 87 5. Europeanization of Foreign Policy-Making 5.1. Introduction………………………………………………………………... 89 5.2. Initial legal-institutional choices…………………………………………... 90 5.3. The Europe Agreements (Pre-accession) stage……………………………. 95 i) Hungary (1990-1998)…………………………………………………… 100 ii) Slovakia (1993-1999)…………………………………………………... 104 iii) Romania (1990-1999) ………………………………………………… 107 5.4. The integration stage………………………………………………………. 112 i) Hungary (1997-2008)…….……………………………………………... 114 ii) Slovakia (1999-2008)….……………………………………………….. 119 iii) Romania (1999-2008) ………………………………………………… 122 5.5. The changing role of the Permanent Representations to the EU…………... 126 5.6. Conclusions………………………………………………………………... 132 6. Europeanization of National Identities 6.1. Introduction……………………………………………………………….. 135 6.2. The Politics of National Identity…………………………………………... 139 iv 6.3. The European Identity Discourse………………………………………….. 151 6.4. Socialization, learning, and power………………………………………… 156 i) Learning………………………………………………………………… 157 ii) Norm entrepreneurs or merely agents of national interest?..................... 167 6.5. Conclusions………………………………………………………………... 174 7. Europeanization of Foreign Policy Conduct 7.1. Introduction………………………………………………………………... 178 7.2. Early foreign policy choices. Continuity and change of foreign policy before EU accession…………………………………………………………… 182 7.3. CFSP and national foreign policies……………………………………….. 187 7.4. The redefinition of the national interest after EU accession……….……… 193 7.5. The 2003 Iraq war: the first test case for the Europeanization
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hungary Since 1989
    C:/ITOOLS/WMS/CUP/578174/WORKINGFOLDER/RME/9780521888103C10.3D 204 [204–232] 10.10.2009 6:02PM 10 Hungary since 1989 ANDRÁS BOZÓKI AND ESZTER SIMON Located in East-Central Europe, Hungary has often found itself at a crossroads of political influences of greater powers as well as of different cultures. Although Hungary enjoyed independence for centuries in its early history, the experience of foreign domination over the last five centuries is one of the defining features of Hungarian public consciousness. Most notably, Hungary was under the control of the Ottoman Empire in the sixteenth and seventeenth century, the Habsburgs in the eighteenth, nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth century, and the Soviet Union from 1945 until the regime change in 1989. Therefore, Hungarians had to master the techniques of survival under foreign domination.1 They learned how to operate informally, under and within formal, rigid rules, which represented the interests of the dominant foreign power. Nonetheless, during its twentieth-century history, Hungary made some genuine albeit short-lived attempts to achieve democracy. First, there was the brief liberal-democratic government of Count Mihály Károlyi in late 1918. A second attempt was made during the semi-democratic coalition government between 1945 and 1947. Finally, Hungary operated as a democracy for twelve remarkable days during the anti-totalitarian revolution of October 1956. The Hungarian revolution was internally successful but was crushed by the inter- vention of the Soviet Red Army. These shining moments of recent Hungarian history cannot hide the fact that throughout the twentieth century Hungary enjoyed democracy for one decade only, the 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Minority Rights After EU Enlargement: a Comparison of Antigay Politics in Poland and Latvia
    Original Article Minority rights after EU enlargement: A comparison of antigay politics in Poland and Latvia Conor O’Dwyer* and Katrina Z.S. Schwartz Department of Political Science, University of Florida, 234 Anderson Hall, PO Box 117325, Gainesville, Florida 32611-7325, USA. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected] *Corresponding author. Abstract This paper examines the recent backlash against gay rights in Poland and Latvia as a test case of the depth and breadth of ‘europeanization’ in the new postcommunist member-states of the European Union (EU). We argue that antigay mobilization in these countries constitutes illiberal governance (and thus a failure of europeanization) on three grounds: failure of institutional protections for sexual minorities, broad inclusion of illiberal elites in mainstream politics and virulence of antigay rhetoric by political elites in the public sphere. To explain the stalled europeanization of nondiscrimination norms regarding sexual minorities, we apply two analytical models widely used to explain successful norm adoption in other policy areas: the ‘external incentives’ and ‘social learning’ models. We find that in the case of gay rights, EU conditionality was weak, and national identity and ‘resonance’ operated against norm adoption, as did domestic institutions (namely, weakly institutionalized party systems). The EU might have overcome these obstacles through persuasion, but deliberative processes were lacking. Our analysis suggests that some of the key factors underlying both models of norm adoption operate differently in the new, postaccession context, and that social learning is likely to play a greater role in postaccession europeanization. Comparative European Politics (2010) 8, 220–243. doi:10.1057/cep.2008.31 Keywords: Latvia; Poland; sexual minorities; European Union; europeanization; illiberalism Introduction In May 2004, Poland and Latvia joined the European Union (EU), ending a long process in which the strength of their democratic institutions was carefully tested and validated by the European Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Königs-Und Fürstenhäuser Aktuelle Staatsführungen DYNASTIEN
    GESCHICHTE und politische Bildung STAATSOBERHÄUPTER (bis 2019) Dynastien Bedeutende Herrscher und Regierungschefs europ.Staaten seit dem Mittelalter Königs-und Fürstenhäuser Aktuelle Staatsführungen DYNASTIEN Römisches Reich Hl. Römisches Reich Fränkisches Reich Bayern Preussen Frankreich Spanien Portugal Belgien Liechtenstein Luxemburg Monaco Niederlande Italien Großbritannien Dänemark Norwegen Schweden Österreich Polen Tschechien Ungarn Bulgarien Rumänien Serbien Kroatien Griechenland Russland Türkei Vorderer Orient Mittel-und Ostasien DYNASTIEN und ihre Begründer RÖMISCHES REICH 489- 1 v.Chr Julier Altrömisches Patriziergeschlecht aus Alba Longa, Stammvater Iulus, Gaius Iulius Caesar Julisch-claudische Dynastie: Augustus, Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, Nero 69- 96 n.Ch Flavier Röm. Herrschergeschlecht aus Latium drei römische Kaiser: Vespasian, Titus, Domitian 96- 180 Adoptivkaiser u. Antonionische Dynastie Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, Mark Aurel, Commodus 193- 235 Severer Aus Nordafrika stammend Septimius Severus, Caracalla, Macrinus, Elagabal, Severus Alexander 293- 364 Constantiner (2.flavische Dynastie) Begründer: Constantius Chlorus Constantinus I., Konstantin I. der Große u.a. 364- 392 Valentinianische Dynastie Valentinian I., Valens, Gratian, Valentinian II. 379- 457 Theodosianische Dynastie Theodosius I.der Große, Honorius, Valentinian III.... 457- 515 Thrakische Dynastie Leo I., Majorian, Anthemius, Leo II., Julius Nepos, Zeno, Anastasius I. 518- 610 Justinianische Dynastie Justin I.,Justinian I.,Justin II.,Tiberios
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN UNION.Pdf
    EUROPEAN UNION The European Union (EU) is a political and economic union of 27 member states that are located primarily in Europe. The EU has developed an internal single market through a standardised system of laws that apply in all member states in those matters, and only those matters, where members have agreed to act as one. EU policies aim to ensure the free movement of people, goods, services and capital within the internal market, enact legislation in justice and home affairs and maintain common policies on trade, agriculture, fisheries and regional development. SOME FACTS ABOUT EU 1. The European Union has its own flag, complete with twelve stars, that generally thought of as a symbol of unity and perfection. 2. The European Union has a motto. It reads: United in Diversity. 3. There are 24 official languages in the European Union. 4. The main currency in the EU is the Euro, but not every country has adopted it. Today, it is the official currency of 19 countries. 5. Member countries aren’t forced to remain in the European Union. Any country is allowed to leave if they so choose, but they obviously must notify the EU of that decision. 6. The European Union has won the Nobel Peace Prize. It was awarded to the EU in 2012 based on its contributions towards peace and reconciliation. 7. The European Parliament is the largest and only directly-elected international body in the world. TIMELINE World War II After World War II, European integration was seen as an antidote to the extreme nationalism which had devastated parts of the continent.
    [Show full text]
  • De La Monosemie La Polisemie În Terminologia Stiintifica
    UNIVERSITATEA DIN BUCURE ŞTI DE LA MONOSEMIE LA POLISEMIE ÎN TERMINOLOGIA ŞTIIN łIFIC Ă ACTUAL Ă Tez ă de doctorat CONDUC ĂTOR ŞTIIN łIFIC prof. univ. dr. Angela Bidu – Vr ănceanu AUTORUL Monica – Mihaela Rizea BUCURE ŞTI 2009 CUPRINS PARTEA I PERSPECTIVE TEORETICE ŞI PRINCIPII DE ANALIZ Ă Cuvânt înainte 1. Parcurs teoretic în terminologie – de la monosemie, la polisemie................16 1.1. Dou ă abord ări distincte – terminologia intern ă vs. terminologia extern ă....16 1.1.1. Terminologia intern ă sau terminologia propriu-zis ă..........................17 1.1.1.1. Considera Ńii generale.............................................................17 1.1.1.2. O perspectiv ă asupra termenului – termenul-concept sau termenul-etichet ă...................................................................21 1.1.2. Terminologia extern ă sau terminologia din perspectiv ă lingvistic ă..26 1.1.2.1. Considera Ńii generale.............................................................26 1.1.2.2. Direc Ńii teoretice....................................................................27 1.1.2.3. Termenul ca termen-lexem....................................................28 1.2. Terminologia intern ă şi terminologia extern ă - teorii în complementaritate...........................................................................33 2. Polisemia din perspectiva terminologiei externe.............................................52 2.1. Considera Ńii generale.....................................................................................52 2.2. Tipuri
    [Show full text]
  • Capital, Labor, and the Prospects of the European Social Model in The
    Central and Eastern Europe Working Paper 58 Capital, Labor, and the Prospects of the European Social Model in the East by Dorothee Bohle Béla Greskovits Central European University Central European University Political Science Department; Department of International Minda de Gunzburg Relations and European Studies; Center for European Studies Committee on Degrees in Social Harvard University Studies, Harvard University ABSTRACT During the past decade of European economic integration vastly worse standards have emerged in work conditions, industrial relations, and social welfare in Eastern Europe than in the West. Area scholars ex- plain this divide by labor weakness caused by the ideological legacy of communism, and do not problema- tize the impact of transnational capital. In contrast, this essay argues that the reason why the European so- cial model has not traveled to the East is that its socio-economic foundations, the industrial building blocks of the historical compromise between capital and labor, have not traveled either. In the West, the compro- mise had been rooted in capital-intensive consumer durables industries, such as car-manufacturing, and their suppliers. These sectors brought together organized and vocal labor with businesses willing to accom- modate workers’ demands, because for them labor had been less a problem as a cost-factor and more im- portant as factor of demand. However, the main driving force of the eastward expansion of European capi- tal has been the relocation of labor-intensive activities where business relies on sweating masses of work- ers, whose importance as consumers is marginal, and who are weak in the workplace and the marketplace.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union and the United Kingdom's Withdrawal BREXIT
    PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ALGERIA Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research University of Tlemcen Faculty of Letters and Languages Department of English Section of English The European Union and the United Kingdom’s Withdrawal BREXIT Dissertation submitted to the Department of English as a partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Literature and Civilization Presented by Supervised by Mr. Abdallah NEGADI Dr. Daoudi FRID Mr. Mohammed Amine BELAID . Academic Year: 2016-2017 I Dedication I dedicate my work to my family members who encouraged me. A special feeling of gratitude to my loving parents whose words of encouragement and push for tenacity ring in my ears To all my friends II Acknowledgement First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Dr FRID Daoudi for his guidance and valuable comments. This thesis would have never been accomplished without his considerable help, advice and guidance. For that, I owe my gratitude to him for his efforts. I extend my gratitude to the teachers who helped me in this study and the members of examiners for having accepted to read and examine my dissertation. Last but not least, great thanks go to all who helped me with encouragement and support which have never ceased all along the preparation of my work. III Abstract The aim of this study is to examine the British relations with the European Union during the last five decades, and to provide analysis of Britain's contemporary position towards the EU. The main question posed by this work concerns whether Britain is well out of the European Union club after the referendum held in June 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • European Union Page 1 of 10
    European Union Page 1 of 10 HOME ARCHIVE CONTACT EUROPEAN UNION Europe Sales Recruitment European Union Looking to set up in Europe? We recruit Everything to do with European Union items. Country Managers Yahoo.com The European Union or EU is an intergovernmental and supranational organisation of European countries, which currently has 25 member states. The Union was established under that name by the Treaty on European Union (commonly known as the Maastricht Treaty) in 1992. However, many aspects of the EU eu training existed before that date through a series of predecessor EU Directives, ICH, EMEA organisations, dating back to the 1950s. The European Two training locations in Union's activities cover all policy areas, from health and Europe! economic policy to foreign affairs and defence. www.cfpie.com However, the nature of its powers differs between areas. Depending on the powers transferred to it by its member states, the EU therefore resembles a federation (e.g. monetary affairs, agricultural, trade and environmental policy), a confederation (e.g. in European Union social and economic policy, consumer protection, Find European Union internal affairs), or an international organisation (e.g. Maps at Great Prices. in foreign affairs). A key activity of the EU is the www.Pronto.com establishment and administration of a common single market, consisting of a customs union, a single currency (adopted by 12 of the 25 member states), a Common Agricultural Policy and a Common Fisheries Eu Communication Policy. On 29 October 2004, European heads of A study about the government signed a Treaty establishing a Constitution Institutional for Europe, which is currently awaiting ratification by Communication of the individual member states.
    [Show full text]
  • Devising New European Policies to Face the Arab Spring
    Papers presented 1 to Conference I and II on Thinking Out of the Box: Devising New European Policies to Face the Arab Spring Edited by: Maria do Céu Pinto Lisboa 2014 With the support of the LLP of the European Union 2 Table of Contents Introduction 4 EU´s Policy Responses: Exploring the Progress and Shortcomings 6 The EU “Paradigmatic Policy Change” in Light of the Arab Spring: A Critical Exploration of the “Black Box” 7 Iole Fontana Assessing European Mediterranean Policy: Success Rather than Failure 18 Marie-Luise Heinrich-Merchergui, Temime Mechergui, and Gerhard Wegner Searching For A “EU Foreign Policy” during the Arab Spring – Member States’ Branding Practices in Libya in the Absence of a Common Position 41 Inez Weitershausen The EU Attempts at Increasing the Efficiency of its Democratization Efforts in the Mediterranean Region in the Aftermath of the Arab Spring 53 Anastasiia Kudlenko The Fall of Authoritarianism and the New Actors in the Arab World 62 The Arab Uprisings and its Impact on Islamist actors 63 Sandra L. Costa The Arab Uprisings through the Eyes of Young Arabs in Europe 75 Valeria Rosato and Pina Sodano Social Networking Websites and Collective Action in the Arab Spring. Case study: Bahrain 85 Seyed Hossein Zarhani The Contradictory Position of the EU towards Political Islam and the New Rapprochement to Islamist Governments 100 Sergio Castaño Riaño THE NEW SECURITY AND GEOPOLITICAL CONTEXT 110 3 Lebanon and the “Arab Spring” 111 Alessandra Frusciante Sectarianism and State Building in Lebanon and Syria 116 Bilal Hamade Civil-Military Relations in North African Countries and Their Challenges 126 Mădălin-Bogdan Răpan Turkey’s Potential Role for the EU’s Approach towards the Arab Spring: Benefits and Limitations 139 Sercan Pekel Analyzing the Domestic and International Conflict in Syria: Are There Any Useful Lessons from Political Science? 146 Jörg Michael Dostal Migration Flows and the Mediterranean Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe: Searching for Its Strategic Compass
    Europe: Searching for its Strategic Compass. Emmanuel Macron’s Vision Author: Jānis Eichmanis Associate Fellow Latvian Institute of International Affairs 2020, Rīga Europe: Searching for its Strategic Compass. Emmanuel Macron’s Vision Jānis Eichmanis Associate Fellow Latvian Institute of International Affairs Riga, 2020 Executive Summary Compelled by the shifting global power relationships which can, at various levels, act as threat multipliers, the European Union, collectively and at the level of member states, seeks geopolitical understanding of these shifts and their consequences for European security; metaphorically, one could say that it is a matter of finding Europe’s ‘strategic compass’. The result, after a process of analysis and debate, would be a common threat analysis and a common strategic culture. Two parallel processes have been initiated; one by the French President Macron that is based on an exclusive group of countries, including the U.K., and the other inclusive, initiated by the Union’s Defence Ministers. From a Latvian perspective the French initiative is the one more fraught with ambiguity, as it is embedded in an attempt to come to terms with the Union’s relations with the United States, Russia and China. In the French understanding of these relations Europe should not become an object of contention but should maintain an independent and autonomous foreign policy course that serves Europe’s interests as an integrated entity that upholds the principles of the ‘rules-based international order’. How President Macron makes his case for his version of the EU’s strategic compass is the subject of this paper. It raises the question of whether Macron’s attempts to refashion the Union’s strategic focus will merge with that of the inclusive EU strategic process or whether the French maintain its separate identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Econ Pol.Pdf
    2 ECONOMIC POLICY IN SLOVAKIA 1990-1999 ANTON MARCINCIN AND MIROSLAV BEBLAVÝ editors 3 The book was supported by the Embassy of the United States of America from the Small Democracy Grants Program. Editors ©Anton Marcincin a Miroslav Beblavý, 2000 © Martin Barto, Miroslav Beblavý, Lucia Haulíková, Marek Jakoby, Tomáš Kmet, Martina Lubyová, Anton Marcincin, Karol Morvay, Andrej Salner, Ján Tóth, Daniela Zemanovicová, 2000 ISBN 80-968147-1-0 4 LIST OF AUTHORS .......................................................................................................9 FOREWORD.................................................................................................................. 10 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 12 2 OVERALL MACROECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.................................... 18 2.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................19 2.2 Characterization of the Development of Principal Macroeconomic Parameters .....19 2.2.1 Performance of the Economy...........................................................................20 2.2.2 Inflation............................................................................................................23 2.2.3 Unemployment ................................................................................................27 2.2.4 External Equilibrium........................................................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels 1 Brussels
    Brussels 1 Brussels Brussels • Bruxelles • Brussel — Region of Belgium — • Brussels-Capital Region • Région de Bruxelles-Capitale • Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest A collage with several views of Brussels, Top: View of the Northern Quarter business district, 2nd left: Floral carpet event in the Grand Place, 2nd right: Brussels City Hall and Mont des Arts area, 3rd: Cinquantenaire Park, 4th left: Manneken Pis, 4th middle: St. Michael and St. Gudula Cathedral, 4th right: Congress Column, Bottom: Royal Palace of Brussels Flag Emblem [1] [2][3] Nickname(s): Capital of Europe Comic city Brussels 2 Location of Brussels(red) – in the European Union(brown & light brown) – in Belgium(brown) Coordinates: 50°51′0″N 4°21′0″E Country Belgium Settled c. 580 Founded 979 Region 18 June 1989 Municipalities Government • Minister-President Charles Picqué (2004–) • Governor Jean Clément (acting) (2010–) • Parl. President Eric Tomas Area • Region 161.38 km2 (62.2 sq mi) Elevation 13 m (43 ft) [4] Population (1 January 2011) • Region 1,119,088 • Density 7,025/km2 (16,857/sq mi) • Metro 1,830,000 Time zone CET (UTC+1) • Summer (DST) CEST (UTC+2) ISO 3166 BE-BRU [5] Website www.brussels.irisnet.be Brussels (French: Bruxelles, [bʁysɛl] ( listen); Dutch: Brussel, Dutch pronunciation: [ˈbrʏsəɫ] ( listen)), officially the Brussels Region or Brussels-Capital Region[6][7] (French: Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, [ʁe'ʒjɔ̃ də bʁy'sɛlkapi'tal] ( listen), Dutch: Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest, Dutch pronunciation: [ˈbrʏsəɫs ɦoːft'steːdələk xəʋɛst] ( listen)), is the capital
    [Show full text]