DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluating Aboriginal Curricula Using a Cree-Métis Perspective with a Regard Towards Indigenous Knowledge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluating Aboriginal Curricula Using a Cree-Métis Perspective with a Regard Towards Indigenous Knowledge Robert-Falcon Ouellette Evaluating Aboriginal Curricula using a Cree-Métis Perspective with a regard towards Indigenous knowledge Thèse présentée à la Faculté des études supérieures et postdoctorales de l'Université Laval dans le cadre du programme de doctorat en anthropologie pour l'obtention du grade de philosophiae doctor (Ph.D.) Département d‘anthropologie Faculté des sciences sociales Université Laval Québec 2011 © Robert-Falcon Ouellette 2011 Summary There has been much development in Aboriginal curriculum guides across Turtle Island since the 1970s by education authorities. This development has been due to a need by many Aboriginal communities to decolonize their education systems. After all this development there is now a need to determine the direction this decolonization has taken and how far the process has progressed. To do this an analysis was conducted of the curriculum currently in use. Three different evaluation models were developed using an Indigenous philosophy to help assess current Aboriginal curricula in relation to an Indigenous philosophical and holistic worldview. To this end, five subgoals were set forth: 1. define a pan-Aboriginal philosophy of Indigenous knowledge; 2. review the history of Aboriginal education; 3. determine the objectives of Aboriginal education; 4. construct multiple frameworks to assess Aboriginal curricula; and 5. analyze over 48 Aboriginal curricula currently in use by Canadian Aboriginal education authorities. This research aims to improve the quality of education for Aboriginal peoples, in response to concerns raised by the Canadian federal government and more importantly by Aboriginal Canadians. Among the latter, multiple debates are going on about the type of education they wish for their children. Should it be integrationist, or Indigenous? Who should control the Aboriginal education system: the federal government, the provincial governments, or Aboriginal organizations (and which one and at what level)? Education is a battleground for larger political projects by both the dominant society and the dominated society. The underlying issues are power, agency, societal structures, survival, money, decolonization, and ongoing colonization. Long-term change is needed, and the conflict will be over the nature of this change. Will it be the Western worldview or the Indigenous one? 2 Resume Depuis les années 70, de nombreux changements se sont produits sur l'Ile de la Tortue concernant le curriculum des Autochtones. Ces changements sont survenus au sein des communautés des Premières Nations afin de décoloniser leur système éducatif. Mais, il est temps maintenant de dresser un bilan de la direction prise par ces systèmes afin de déterminer l'étendue du progrès. Pour ce faire, une étude a été menée sur le curriculum actuellement utilisé. Trois différents modèles d'évaluation basés sur la philosophie autochtone et une vision holistique de l'éducation ont été utilisés. À cette fin, cinq champs de travail ont été choisis: 1. définir le savoir des Premières Nations selon la philosophie pan-autochtone 2. Réviser l'histoire de l'éducation autochtone 3. Déterminer les objectifs de l'éducation autochtone 4. Mettre sur pieds des critères d'évaluation des curricula autochtones 5. Analyser plus de 48 curricula autochtones présentement utilisés par les autorités autochtones du Canada En réponse aux demandes du gouvernement fédéral et des autochtones du Canada, cette recherche a pour but d'améliorer la qualité de l'éducation offerte aux Premières Nations. De nombreux débats touchant le type d'éducation que les Premières Nations souhaitent offrir à leurs enfants sont présentement en cours. L'éducation se doit-elle d'être intégrationiste ou bien aborigène? Qui devrait contrôler le système éducationnel: le gouvernement fédéral, le gouvernement provincial ou des organisations autochtones? L'éducation est le cheval de bataille des grands projets politiques, qu'ils soient ceux de la société dominante ou de la société dominée. Contrôle, «agency», les structures sociales, survie, argent, décolonisation et colonisation sont des éléments qui affect l‘éducation des autochtones. Un changement durable est nécessaire, mais il ne se fera pas sans quelques conflits sur la nature de ce changement. Sera-t-il occidental ou bien autochtone de nature? 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS INDEX OF IMAGES, CHARTS AND GRAPHS .......................................................................................7 DEDICATION ...............................................................................................................................................9 EAST: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 10 Initial Thoughts .................................................................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION AND METHOD................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Research Methodology: Procedure and Questions .................................................................... 22 1.2 Ethical Considerations ............................................................................................................... 36 SOUTH: INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE ................................................................................................. 40 CHAPTER 2. GENERAL BACKGROUND OF ABORIGINAL EDUCATION .......................................................... 41 2.1 Indigenous Knowledge ............................................................................................................... 43 2.2 Holistic and Religious Knowledge ............................................................................................. 45 2.3 IK and Anthropology .................................................................................................................. 49 2.4 Worldview ................................................................................................................................... 54 2.5 Creation ...................................................................................................................................... 58 CHAPTER 3. COLONIALISM AND DECOLONIZATION ................................................................................... 62 3.1 Colonialism and Indigenous Knowledge .................................................................................... 66 3.2 Colonialism and Identity ............................................................................................................ 70 3.3 Colonialism and Legitimacy ....................................................................................................... 72 3.4 The Land ..................................................................................................................................... 73 3.5 Power and Place ........................................................................................................................ 79 3.6 Power, Respect, Reciprocity ....................................................................................................... 83 3.7 Respect in the Transmission of IK .............................................................................................. 84 3.8 Sharing ....................................................................................................................................... 85 3.9 Spirituality in Schooling and Responsibility ............................................................................... 87 3.10 Language and Orality ............................................................................................................ 91 3.11 Oral Tradition ........................................................................................................................ 98 CHAPTER 4. HISTORICAL REVIEW OF ABORIGINAL EDUCATION IN THE POLITICAL ENTITY OF CANADA 103 4.1 Treaties and Education ............................................................................................................. 109 4.2 Education Pre-White Paper, 1969 ............................................................................................ 115 4.3 White Paper 1969 ..................................................................................................................... 119 4.4 Curriculum of Indian Residential Schools ................................................................................ 128 4.5 Continuing Structural Violence of Indian Residential Schools ................................................ 141 4.6 International Indigenous Rights in Education .......................................................................... 148 4.7 Control of Education ................................................................................................................ 151 4.8 Tradition and Education: Towards a Vision of Our Future ..................................................... 162 4.9 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples ............................................................................... 164 CHAPTER 5. JURISDICTION IN ABORIGINAL EDUCATION .......................................................................... 166 5.1 First Nations Jurisdiction over Education in British Columbia Act and Other Cases: Independence, Integration, or Assimilation ....................................................................................... 177 5.2 First Nations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reflections on Health Transfer in the Swampy Cree Tribal Council Area
    Arctic Medical Research vol. 53: Suppl. 2,pp.130-132.1994 Health Administration: Reflections on Health Transfer in the Swampy Cree Tribal Council Area Patricia A. Stewart and Roger Procyk Cree National Tribal Health Center, Manitoba, Canada. The Swampy Cree Tribal Council, based in The Pas, the breaking of a promise made under Tre~ties be· northern Manitoba, has been faced with the chal­ tween the Federal Government and our Frrst Na· lenge of having to negotiate with two levels of gov­ tions. ernment - Federal and Provincial - for the transfer of When the Federal Government's Health Transfer administration of health care services dollars from Policy was developing in 1986, the Trib~ Co~cil these governments to our First Nations. Seven First immediately took steps to try to open d1scuss1ons Nations, in a territory of 150,000 square kilometers, with the Provincial Government to consider tranSfer· have cooperated to establish a regional Tribal Health ring the province's resources to First Nations. <_>v~ Center to deliver their own specialty health services the next two years there were some talks but with and to coordinate many of the training, health educa­ change in government and an election in 1988, ~ tion, research and on-going development activities. Tribal Council was put ,,on hold" by the new p~vi: The resources of health transfer have enabled us to cial government who stated they had no pos1non undertake a number of initiatives which we would policy on dealing with treaty people. like to share with you in this paper. Establishment of Health Boards History of The Tribal Council and Health In 1986, the Tribal Council entered into a pre-heal~ Development transfer agreement with the Federal Governmen.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Indigenous Organizations and Services in Alberta (July 2019)
    frog Guide to Indigenous Organizations and Services in Alberta Page 2 For additional copies of the Community Profiles, please contact: Indigenous Relations First Nations and Metis Relations 10155–102 Street NW Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4G8 Phone: 780-644-4989 Fax: 780-415-9548 Website: www.indigenous.alberta.ca To call toll-free from anywhere in Alberta, dial 310-0000. To request that an organization be added or deleted or to update information, please fill out the Guide Update Form included in the publication and send it to Indigenous Relations. You may also complete and submit this form online. Go to www.indigenous.alberta.ca and look under Resources for the correct link. This publication is also available online as a PDF document at www.indigenous.alberta.ca. The Resources section of the website also provides links to the other Ministry publications. ISBN 978-0-7785-9868-8 PRINT ISBN 978-0-7785-9870-8 WEB ISSN 1925-5179 PRINT ISSN 1925-5287 WEB Guide to Indigenous Organizations and Services in Alberta Page 3 INTRODUCTORY NOTE This Guide provides a list of Indigenous organizations and services in Alberta. Also included are national and umbrella organizations with offices located elsewhere. The Guide is compiled and produced by the Ministry of Indigenous Relations in order to provide contact information for these Indigenous organizations and services. Listings are restricted to not-for-profit organizations and services. The information provided in the Guide is current at the time of printing. Information is subject to change. You are encouraged to confirm the information with additional resources or with the organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a IAMGOLD Côté Gold Project Aboriginal Consultation Plan (Previously Submitted to the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines in 2013
    Summary of Consultation to Support the Côté Gold Project Closure Plan Côté Gold Project Appendix A IAMGOLD Côté Gold Project Aboriginal Consultation Plan (previously submitted to the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines in 2013 Stakeholder Consultation Plan (2013) TC180501 | October 2018 CÔTÉ GOLD PROJECT PROVINCIAL INDIVIDUAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE APPENDIX D PROPOSED STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PLAN Submitted to: IAMGOLD Corporation 401 Bay Street, Suite 3200 Toronto, Ontario M5H 2Y4 Submitted by: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, a Division of AMEC Americas Limited 160 Traders Blvd. East, Suite 110 Mississauga, Ontario L4Z 3K7 July 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Provincial EA and Consultation Plan Requirements ........................................... 1-1 1.3 Federal EA and Consultation Plan Requirements .............................................. 1-2 1.4 Responsibility for Plan Implementation .............................................................. 1-3 2.0 CONSULTATION APPROACH ..................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Goals and Objectives ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Stakeholder Identification ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profiles for the Oneca Education And
    FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 Political/Territorial Facts About This Community Phone Number First Nation and Address Nation and Region Organization or and Fax Number Affiliation (if any) • Census data from 2006 states Aamjiwnaang First that there are 706 residents. Nation • This is a Chippewa (Ojibwe) community located on the (Sarnia) (519) 336‐8410 Anishinabek Nation shores of the St. Clair River near SFNS Sarnia, Ontario. 978 Tashmoo Avenue (Fax) 336‐0382 • There are 253 private dwellings in this community. SARNIA, Ontario (Southwest Region) • The land base is 12.57 square kilometres. N7T 7H5 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 506 residents. Alderville First Nation • This community is located in South‐Central Ontario. It is 11696 Second Line (905) 352‐2011 Anishinabek Nation intersected by County Road 45, and is located on the south side P.O. Box 46 (Fax) 352‐3242 Ogemawahj of Rice Lake and is 30km north of Cobourg. ROSENEATH, Ontario (Southeast Region) • There are 237 private dwellings in this community. K0K 2X0 • The land base is 12.52 square kilometres. COPYRIGHT OF THE ONECA EDUCATION PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM 1 FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 406 residents. • This Algonquin community Algonquins of called Pikwàkanagàn is situated Pikwakanagan First on the beautiful shores of the Nation (613) 625‐2800 Bonnechere River and Golden Anishinabek Nation Lake. It is located off of Highway P.O. Box 100 (Fax) 625‐1149 N/A 60 and is 1 1/2 hours west of Ottawa and 1 1/2 hours south of GOLDEN LAKE, Ontario Algonquin Park.
    [Show full text]
  • A BRIEF HISTORY of OUR RIGHT to SELF-GOVERNANCE Pre-Contact to Present
    A BRIEF HISTORY of OUR RIGHT to SELF-GOVERNANCE Pre-Contact to Present A BRIEF HISTORY of OUR RIGHT to SELF-GOVERNANCE Pre-Contact to Present The first nine chapters for this publication were prepared for the National Centre for First Nations Governance (NCFNG) by Professor Kent McNeil in March, 2007. Kent McNeil has taught at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto since 1987. He specializes in Indigenous rights, especially in Canada, Australia, and the United States. The Duty to Consult Aboriginal People was prepared by NCFNG research staff. NCFNG supports First Nations as they seek to implement effective, independent governance. The Centre delivers nation rebuilding services to First Nation communities across Canada. NCFNG is an independent service and research organization that is governed and staffed by experienced First Nation professionals. 4 Introduction For thousands of years, the aboriginal people of what is now Canada organized themselves as sovereign nations, with what was essentially gov - ernmental jurisdiction over their lands, including property rights.Those rights — of governance and property — were trampled in the stampede of European settlement, colonization and commercial interests. But they were never lost or extinguished. Read this brief historic account of the rights inherited by citizens of today’s First Nations, Learn about the erosion of property and governance rights through the dark periods of colonization and marginalization, and ultimately, their affirmation in Canada’s constitution and recognition in Canadian
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Peoples in the Superior-Greenstone Region: an Informational Handbook for Staff and Parents
    Aboriginal Peoples in the Superior-Greenstone Region: An Informational Handbook for Staff and Parents Superior-Greenstone District School Board 2014 2 Aboriginal Peoples in the Superior-Greenstone Region Acknowledgements Superior-Greenstone District School Board David Tamblyn, Director of Education Nancy Petrick, Superintendent of Education Barb Willcocks, Aboriginal Education Student Success Lead The Native Education Advisory Committee Rachel A. Mishenene Consulting Curriculum Developer ~ Rachel Mishenene, Ph.D. Student, M.Ed. Edited by Christy Radbourne, Ph.D. Student and M.Ed. I would like to acknowledge the following individuals for their contribution in the development of this resource. Miigwetch. Dr. Cyndy Baskin, Ph.D. Heather Cameron, M.A. Christy Radbourne, Ph.D. Student, M.Ed. Martha Moon, Ph.D. Student, M.Ed. Brian Tucker and Cameron Burgess, The Métis Nation of Ontario Deb St. Amant, B.Ed., B.A. Photo Credits Ruthless Images © All photos (with the exception of two) were taken in the First Nations communities of the Superior-Greenstone region. Additional images that are referenced at the end of the book. © Copyright 2014 Superior-Greenstone District School Board All correspondence and inquiries should be directed to: Superior-Greenstone District School Board Office 12 Hemlo Drive, Postal Bag ‘A’, Marathon, ON P0T 2E0 Telephone: 807.229.0436 / Facsimile: 807.229.1471 / Webpage: www.sgdsb.on.ca Aboriginal Peoples in the Superior-Greenstone Region 3 Contents What’s Inside? Page Indian Power by Judy Wawia 6 About the Handbook 7
    [Show full text]
  • Waterhen Lake First Nation Treaty
    Waterhen Lake First Nation Treaty Villatic and mingy Tobiah still wainscotted his tinct necessarily. Inhumane Ingelbert piecing illatively. Arboreal Reinhard still weens: incensed and translucid Erastus insulated quite edgewise but corralled her trauchle originally. Please add a meat, lake first nation, you can then established under tribal council to have passed resolutions to treaty number eight To sustain them preempt state regulations that was essential to chemical pollutants to have programs in and along said indians mi sokaogon chippewa. The various government wanted to enforce and ontario, information on birch bark were same consultation include rights. Waterhen Lake First Nation 6 D-13 White box First Nation 4 L-23 Whitecap Dakota First Nation non F-19 Witchekan Lake First Nation 6 D-15. Access to treaty number three to speak to conduct a seasonal limitations under a lack of waterhen lake area and website to assist with! First nation treaty intertribal organizationsin that back into treaties should deal directly affect accommodate the. Deer lodge First Nation draft community based land grab plan. Accordingly the Waterhen Lake Walleye and Northern Pike Gillnet. Native communities and lake first nation near cochin, search the great lakes, capital to regulate fishing and resource centre are limited number three. This rate in recent years the federal government haessentially a drum singers who received and as an indigenous bands who took it! Aboriginal rights to sandy lake! Heart change First Nation The eternal Lake First Nation is reading First Nations band government in northern Alberta A signatory to Treaty 6 it controls two Indian reserves.
    [Show full text]
  • Nlaka'pamux Nation Tribal Council V. British Columbia (Environmental Assessment Office)
    FOR EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY Page 1 2009 CarswellBC 2525, 2009 BCSC 1275, [2009] B.C.W.L.D. 7980, [2009] B.C.W.L.D. 8025, 46 C.E.L.R. (3d) 183, [2009] 4 C.N.L.R. 213 2009 CarswellBC 2525, 2009 BCSC 1275, [2009] B.C.W.L.D. 7980, [2009] B.C.W.L.D. 8025, 46 C.E.L.R. (3d) 183, [2009] 4 C.N.L.R. 213 Nlaka'pamux Nation Tribal Council v. British Columbia (Environmental Assessment Office) Nlaka'pamux Nation Tribal Council (Petitioner) and Derek Griffin in his capacity as Project Assessment Director, Envir- onmental Assessment Office, Belkorp Environmental Services Inc. and Village of Cache Creek (Respondents) British Columbia Supreme Court Sewell J. Heard: August 4-7, 2009 Judgment: September 17, 2009 Docket: Vancouver S092162 © Thomson Reuters Canada Limited or its Licensors (excluding individual court documents). All rights reserved. Counsel: Reidar Mogerman, M. Underhill for Petitioner P. Foy, Q.C., E. Christie for Respondent, Derek Griffin in his capacity as Project Assessment Director, Environmental Assessment Office S. Fitterman for Respondent, Belkorp Environmental Services Inc. No one for Village of Cache Creek Subject: Environmental; Public; Constitutional; Property Environmental law --- Statutory protection of environment — Environmental assessment — Aboriginal interests Proposal concerned 40 hectare extension of landfill — Landfill was located on or near boundary of Aboriginal Bands and Nations — Extension project was opposed by tribal council (NNTC) of one of Aboriginal Nations — NNTC brought ap- plication for order quashing order issued
    [Show full text]
  • Will the Federal Government Get It Right This Time? Will the Federal Government Get It Right This Time?
    INDIGENOUS EDUCATION: WILL THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GET IT RIGHT THIS TIME? WILL THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GET IT RIGHT THIS TIME? MORE OPTIMISTIC ABOUT THE POTENTIAL FOR POSITIVE CHANGE SIGNIFICANT NEW INVESTMENTS IN K-12 AND PSE BUDGETS OVER LAST TWO FISCAL CYCLES COMMITMENT TO ENGAGEMENT AND PARTNERSHIP BUT, … STILL A LONG WAY TO GO…AND A LEGACY OF GETTING IT WRONG THREE THINGS: SOME HISTORY ON FEDERAL INDIGENOUS EDUCATION POLICY SHARING SOME LESSONS FROM THE B.C. EXPERIENCE THOUGHTS ON THE “WHERE TO FROM HERE?” SOME PRELIMINARY THOUGHTS THE TRANSFORMATIVE POWER OF EDUCATION “CLOSING GAPS” IN EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES FOR FIRST NATIONS, METIS AMD INUIT STUDENTS REMAINS A PRESSING AND SUBSTANTIAL ISSUE OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE PROGRESS ACROSS THE COUNTRY HAS BEEN UNEVEN DANGER OF THE “RACE TO THE MIDDLE” AND “ONE SIZE FITS ALL” SOLUTIONS COMPLEX JURISDICTIONAL ENVIRONMENT PROVINCES HAVE “EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION” OVER EDUCATION - SEC. 93 OF THE CONSTITUTION ACT SCHOOL BOARDS WITH AUTHORITY UNDER PROVINCIAL ENABLING LEGISLATION FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WITH JURISDICTION OVER “INDIANS AND LANDS RESERVED FOR THE INDIANS” - SEC. 91 (27) OF THE CONSTITUTION ACT - EDUCATION OBLIGATIONS IN SOME OF THE NUMBERED TREATIES FIRST NATIONS OPERATING BAND SCHOOLS UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE INDIAN ACT OR PURSUANT TO NEGOTIATED AGREEMENTS LOOKING BACK THE LEGACY OF THE RESIDENTIAL SCHOOLS EXPERIENCE DIAND’S 1969 “WHITE PAPER” ON EDUCATION THE NATIVE INDIAN BROTHERHOOD’S 1972 PAPER ON “INDIAN CONTROL OVER INDIAN EDUCATION” - LATER REVISED AS THE A.F.N.’S “FIRST NATIONS CONTROL OVER FIRST NATIONS EDUCATION” YEARS OF “CONTROL” OVER AN UNDERFUNDED SYSTEM CALLS FOR CHANGE: And Some Lost Opportunities 1988 - IN B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Peoples' Advisory Committee Minutes of The
    INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD Friday, November 9, 2018 @ 11:00 a.m. Schumacher Board Office – with v/c to NLBO Committee Members Present: Howard Archibald - First Nations Trustee – DSB Ontario North East and Chair of IPAC Arline Chasle - Director of Education, Timiskaming First Nation (v/c from New Liskeard Board Office) Rose Thomas - Education Officer, Matachewan First Nation t/c Neil Iserhoff - Education Director, Taykwa Tagamou Nation Cathy Naveau - Education Director, Mattagami First Nation Saunders Porter - Trustee, DSB Ontario North East Rosemary Pochopsky - Acting Chair for today and Trustee, DSB Ontario North East Committee Members Absent: Lynn Mongrain - Representative, Temagami First Nation (teleconference) James McGrogan - Incoming Director of Education, Wahgoshig First Nation Administration Present: Lesleigh Dye - Director of Education, District School Board Ontario North East Pearl Fong-West - Superintendent of Business and Finance Lisa Innes - Vice Principal, Indigenous Education Administration Absent: Resource Persons & Guests Present Anne Commando-Dube - Education Partnership Liaison, Wabun Tribal Council Audrey McLaren - Education Partnership Coordinator, Timiskaming First Nation(v/c from New Liskeard Board Office) Doug Shearer - Trustee, DSB Ontario North East Resource Persons & Regular Guests -Absent Bernice Brunette - Executive Director, Ininew Indian Friendship Centre, Cochrane Chris McKay - Wawatay FN James Wesley - Director of Education, Kashechewan First Nation Derek McKay -
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Presence in Our Schools
    District School Board Ontario North East Aboriginal Presence in Our Schools A Guide for Staff District School Board Ontario North East Revised 2014 Aboriginal Presence in Our Schools ii District School Board Ontario North East Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ vi Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... vii Supporting Aboriginal Students in DSB Ontario North East ............................................................. 1 First Nations Trustee ....................................................................................................................... 1 First Nations Advisory Committee ................................................................................................. 1 Voluntary Self-Identification .......................................................................................................... 1 Aboriginal Youth Liaison Officers ................................................................................................. 2 Aboriginal Presence in Our Schools ................................................................................................... 3 Ensuring Success for Schools ............................................................................................................. 3 Terminology .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Wealth of First Nations
    The Wealth of First Nations Tom Flanagan Fraser Institute 2019 Copyright ©2019 by the Fraser Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief passages quoted in critical articles and reviews. The author of this book has worked independently and opinions expressed by him are, there- fore, his own and and do not necessarily reflect those of the Institute, its Board of Directors, its donors and supporters, or its staff. This publication in no way implies that the Fraser Institute, its directors, or staff are in favour of, or oppose the passage of, any bill; or that they support or oppose any particular political party or candidate. Printed and bound in Canada National Library of Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data The Wealth of First Nations / by Tom Flanagan Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-88975-533-8. Fraser Institute ◆ fraserinstitute.org Contents Preface / v introduction —Making and Taking / 3 Part ONE—making chapter one —The Community Well-Being Index / 9 chapter two —Governance / 19 chapter three —Property / 29 chapter four —Economics / 37 chapter five —Wrapping It Up / 45 chapter six —A Case Study—The Fort McKay First Nation / 57 Part two—taking chapter seven —Government Spending / 75 chapter eight —Specific Claims—Money / 93 chapter nine —Treaty Land Entitlement / 107 chapter ten —The Duty to Consult / 117 chapter eleven —Resource Revenue Sharing / 131 conclusion —Transfers and Off Ramps / 139 References / 143 about the author / 161 acknowledgments / 162 Publishing information / 163 Purpose, funding, & independence / 164 About the Fraser Institute / 165 Peer review / 166 Editorial Advisory Board / 167 fraserinstitute.org ◆ Fraser Institute Preface The Liberal government of Justin Trudeau elected in 2015 is attempting massive policy innovations in Indigenous affairs.
    [Show full text]