DOCSLIB.ORG

Land Buy-Back Program for Tribal Nations Cumulative Sales Through July 3, 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Land Buy-Back Program for Tribal Nations Cumulative Sales Through July 3, 2020 Land Buy-Back Program for Tribal Nations Cumulative Sales through July 3, 2020 Offers Made Approved Offers Land and Ownership Statistics 1 Individuals Offers Tribe # of Unique # of 3 # of Unique 4 # of Accepted 3 $ Capture # of Equivalent # of $ Amount Accepted Rate $ Amount 2 Unique 2 Unique 4 5 Fractional Acres Tracts Individuals Individuals Rate Rate Offers Offers Interests Purchased Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian w w w w 100% w 100% w 100% w 3 w Reservation, California Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana Initial Implementation (2015-2016) 9,303 14,050 $ 205,561,644 3,750 40% 4,122 29% $ 70,148,215 34% 44,558 218,342 3,205 Return Implementation (2019) 7,916 7,923 $ 47,443,005 2,082 26% 2,088 26% $ 16,018,327 34% 13,200 59,470 2,559 Total to Date 10,629 21,104 $ 252,843,261 4,846 46% 6,210 29% $ 86,166,542 34% 57,758 277,812 3,589 Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the 3,691 3,697 $ 6,634,793 1,012 27% 1,012 27% $ 3,018,256 45% 4,350 3,492 440 Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation of Montana Initial Implementation (2016) 6,968 6,979 $ 272,999,364 4,545 65% 4,550 65% $ 156,154,358 57% 142,057 323,422 5,292 Return Implemtation (2019) 5,834 5,835 $ 115,476,526 2,699 46% 2,699 46% $ 54,780,491 47% 42,273 115,136 4,663 Total to Date 7,748 12,704 $ 388,457,344 5,541 72% 7,249 57% $ 210,934,849 54% 184,330 438,559 5,870 Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, California w w w w 50% w 50% w 67% w 26 w Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes, Oklahoma 2,922 2,922 $ 17,547,517 760 26% 760 26% $ 5,125,950 29% 1,632 3,134 129 Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River Reservation, South 7,245 7,250 $ 156,397,820 3,284 45% 3,288 45% $ 78,235,791 50% 27,069 246,947 3,138 Dakota Coeur D'Alene Tribe 506 530 $ 13,334,520 220 43% 226 43% $ 5,207,475 39% 394 2,586 77 Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation 2,270 2,980 $ 15,218,415 749 33% 853 29% $ 10,303,797 68% 2,328 6,533 349 Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation 3,872 6,005 $ 134,770,938 2,105 54% 2,881 48% $ 57,674,795 43% 22,891 33,253 1,259 Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation 5,152 5,152 $ 25,440,446 1,379 27% 1,379 27% $ 9,839,343 39% 10,204 32,921 1,262 Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Initial Implementation (2014) 2,378 4,538 $ 30,509,798 1,087 46% 1,687 37% $ 12,455,862 41% 4,748 10,172 476 Return Implemtation (2018) 2,040 2,045 $ 27,573,018 762 37% 767 38% $ 7,954,133 29% 3,285 6,664 632 Total to Date 2,764 6,394 $ 58,062,927 1,498 54% 2,454 38% $ 20,409,995 35% 8,033 16,836 762 Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon 766 894 $ 4,078,702 192 25% 207 23% $ 826,654 20% 627 1,350 176 Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Creek Reservation, South Dakota 6,161 6,164 $ 42,040,398 2,368 38% 2,368 38% $ 22,885,058 54% 6,708 10,331 281 Crow Tribe of Montana Initial Implementation (2014) 4,103 4,149 $ 304,054,607 2,520 61% 2,560 62% $ 130,477,269 43% 76,922 243,801 3,348 Return Implementation (2019) 3,923 4,494 $ 188,208,185 2,119 54% 2,391 53% $ 77,904,213 41% 40,640 132,753 3,515 Total to Date 4,801 8,558 $ 492,249,627 3,371 70% 4,951 58% $ 208,381,482 42% 117,562 376,554 4,132 Fort Belknap Indian Community of the Fort Belknap Reservation of Montana Initial Implementation (2014) 3,490 3,599 $ 104,430,105 1,852 53% 1,873 52% $ 60,707,370 58% 25,561 200,625 2,345 Return Implementation (2019) 3,028 3,031 $ 27,673,228 972 32% 974 32% $ 12,192,889 44% 9,288 65,960 1,924 Total to Date 3,914 6,303 $ 131,967,937 2,338 60% 2,847 45% $ 72,900,259 55% 34,849 266,505 2,698 Land Buy-Back Program for Tribal Nations Cumulative Sales through July 3, 2020 Offers Made Approved Offers Land and Ownership Statistics 1 Individuals Offers Tribe # of Unique # of 3 # of Unique 4 # of Accepted 3 $ Capture # of Equivalent # of $ Amount Accepted Rate $ Amount 2 Unique 2 Unique 4 5 Fractional Acres Tracts Individuals Individuals Rate Rate Offers Offers Interests Purchased Gila River Indian Community of the Gila River Indian Reservation, 2,021 2,052 $ 91,858,379 1,029 51% 1,044 51% $ 61,314,595 67% 2,138 1,167 124 Arizona Lower Brule Sioux Tribe of the Lower Brule Reservation, South Dakota 4,333 4,333 $ 11,189,515 1,398 32% 1,398 32% $ 5,438,763 49% 9,246 14,174 463 Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation 942 943 $ 4,364,314 512 54% 512 54% $ 3,787,983 87% 817 684 26 Makah Indian Tribe of the Makah Indian Reservation 950 1,284 $ 3,988,755 429 45% 519 40% $ 2,345,587 59% 1,053 242 60 Minnesota Chippewa - Bois Forte Band 1,545 1,545 $ 3,496,625 540 35% 540 35% $ 1,847,035 53% 5,036 2,815 179 Minnesota Chippewa - Fond du Lac Band Initial Implementation (2016) 4,014 6,087 $ 6,295,269 1,233 31% 1,515 25% $ 2,772,684 44% 7,555 3,515 295 Return Implementation (2019) 3,256 3,256 $ 2,393,682 498 15% 498 15% $ 633,263 26% 2,122 732 262 Total to Date 4,299 9,264 $ 8,673,557 1,474 34% 2,013 22% $ 3,405,947 39% 9,677 4,248 331 Navajo Nation, Arizona, New Mexico & Utah Initial Implementation (2016) 25,509 27,252 $ 259,792,318 11,084 43% 11,918 44% $ 108,087,070 42% 74,216 155,495 2,856 Return Implementation (2019) 19,985 20,950 $ 157,163,211 5,175 26% 5,377 26% $ 42,396,169 27% 21,702 48,633 2,577 Total to Date 28,141 48,152 $ 416,948,557 14,019 50% 17,295 36% $ 150,483,240 36% 95,918 204,127 3,107 Nez Perce Tribe 1,092 1,092 $ 10,570,982 372 34% 372 34% $ 3,633,064 34% 1,647 2,261 163 Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana Initial Implementation (2014) 2,563 3,067 $ 27,297,871 1,216 47% 1,390 45% $ 9,866,839 36% 5,735 20,130 575 Return Implementation (2019) 2,300 2,300 $ 24,614,014 837 36% 837 36% $ 8,796,574 36% 2,640 7,187 536 Total to Date 3,033 5,367 $ 51,911,885 1,671 55% 2,227 41% $ 18,663,413 36% 8,375 27,317 726 Oglala Sioux Tribe Initial Implementation (2014) 20,622 34,332 $ 329,913,486 9,319 45% 12,826 37% $ 110,395,928 34% 86,306 292,720 5,011 Return Implementation (2018) 15,791 15,840 $ 94,031,826 3,464 22% 3,484 22% $ 21,785,604 23% 20,143 58,180 3,644 Total to Date 22,824 49,114 $ 423,760,511 11,305 50% 16,310 33% $ 132,181,532 31% 106,449 350,793 5,417 Omaha Tribe of Nebraska 2,251 2,251 $ 16,955,546 739 33% 739 33% $ 6,530,119 39% 4,098 2,024 130 Pala Band of Mission Indians 611 611 $ 3,824,649 153 25% 153 25% $ 1,441,750 38% 808 68 52 Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pechanga Reservation, 584 584 $ 2,059,491 49 8% 49 8% $ 535,758 26% 147 39 28 California Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 1,577 1,925 $ 7,489,882 602 38% 680 35% $ 3,536,156 47% 2,854 2,032 93 Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation, Kansas 1,656 1,656 $ 10,651,031 682 41% 682 41% $ 5,157,029 48% 2,411 3,299 146 Quinault Indian Nation 2,174 2,174 $ 59,513,063 1,208 56% 1,208 56% $ 39,728,998 67% 4,051 9,197 211 Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Rincon Reservation, w w w w 2% 2 2% w 19% w 3 w California Land Buy-Back Program for Tribal Nations Cumulative Sales through July 3, 2020 Offers Made Approved Offers Land and Ownership Statistics 1 Individuals Offers Tribe # of Unique # of 3 # of Unique 4 # of Accepted 3 $ Capture # of Equivalent # of $ Amount Accepted Rate $ Amount 2 Unique 2 Unique 4 5 Fractional Acres Tracts Individuals Individuals Rate Rate Offers Offers Interests Purchased Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud Indian Reservation, South Dakota Initial Implementation (2014) 13,649 23,883 $ 101,449,368 4,450 33% 5,414 23% $ 23,597,262 23% 25,493 46,175 2,486 Return Implementation (2018) 11,050 11,579 $ 36,560,064 1,825 17% 1,851 16% $ 6,690,593 18% 9,129 11,505 1,929 Total to Date 14,830 33,903 $ 137,814,882 5,707 38% 7,265 21% $ 30,287,855 22% 34,624 57,682 2,830 Round Valley Indian Tribes, Round Valley Reservation, California 1,114 1,114 $ 5,974,767 298 27% 298 27% $ 2,424,794 41% 814 346 70 Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of the Salt River Reservation, 1,344 1,406 $ 32,537,955 560 42% 585 42% $ 20,316,301 62% 890 194 27 Arizona Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska 1,599 1,599 $ 2,064,007 420 26% 420 26% $ 817,700 40% 866 479 54 Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation 2,032 2,467 $ 87,741,210 803 40% 930 38% $ 33,291,726 38% 5,327 21,977 598 Sisseton - Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, South 2,998 2,999 $ 65,575,508 1,357 45% 1,358 45% $ 31,622,762 48% 5,417 8,861 392 Dakota Skokomish Indian Tribe 356 356 $ 1,131,510 175 49% 175 49% $ 766,531 68% 263 170 9 Spirit Lake Tribe, North Dakota 5,126 5,126 $ 13,163,607 2,005 39% 2,005 39% $ 7,772,205 59% 26,962 17,368 785 Squaxin Island Tribe of the Squaxin Island Reservation 655 655 $ 1,593,155 208 32% 208 32% $ 725,972 46% 400 156 15 Standing Rock Sioux Tribe of North & South Dakota Initial Implementation (2015) 18,131 20,061 $ 230,687,368 7,395 41% 8,003 40% $ 110,161,479 48% 88,304 191,436 4,814 Return Implementation (2020) 17,672 17,672 $ 52,830,744 2,099 12% 2,099 12% $ 12,644,402 24% 22,273 30,878 3,886 Total to Date 22,224 36,156 $ 283,353,431 8,540 38% 10,102 28% $ 122,805,882 43% 110,577 222,314 5,533 Stockbridge Munsee Community, Wisconsin w w w w 28% w 28% w 23% w 2 w Swinomish Indian Tribal Community 216 216 $ 4,302,570 171 79% 171 79% $ 3,195,323 74% 230 243 10 Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation w w w w 71% w 71% w 55% w 3 w The Osage Nation 334 397 $ 17,851,102 143 43% 171 43% $ 8,279,871 46% 424 6,036 92 The Quapaw Tribe of Indians w w w w 45% w 45% w 40% w 2 w Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota 3,085 3,085 $ 35,677,007 245 8% 245
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North: Lummi, Nooksack, Samish, Sauk-Suiattle, Stillaguamish
    Policy 7.01 Implementation Plan Region 2 North (R2N) Community Services Division (CSD) Serving the following Tribes: Lummi Nation, Nooksack Indian Tribe, Samish Indian Nation, Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe, Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians, Swinomish Tribal Community, Tulalip Tribes, & Upper Skagit Indian Tribe Biennium Timeframe: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Revised 04/2021 Annual Key Due Dates: April 1st - CSD Regional Administrators submit 7.01 Plan and Progress Reports (PPRs) to CSD HQ Coordinator. April 13th – CSD HQ Coordinator will submit Executive Summary & 7.01 PPRs to the ESA Office of Assistant Secretary for final review. April 23rd - ESA Office of the Assistant Secretary will send all 7.01 PPRs to Office of Indian Policy (OIP). 7.01 Meetings: January 17th- Cancelled due to inclement weather Next scheduled meeting April 17th, hosted by the Nooksack Indian Tribe. 07/07/20 Virtual 7.01 meeting. 10/16/20 7.01 Virtual meeting 01/15/21 7.01 Virtual 04/16/21 7.01 Virtual 07/16/21 7.01 Virtual Implementation Plan Progress Report Status Update for the Fiscal Year Goals/Objectives Activities Expected Outcome Lead Staff and Target Date Starting Last July 1 Revised 04/2021 Page 1 of 27 1. Work with tribes Lead Staff: to develop Denise Kelly 08/16/2019 North 7.01 Meeting hosted by services, local [email protected] , Tulalip Tribes agreements, and DSHS/CSD Tribal Liaison Memorandums of 10/18/2019 North 7.01 Meeting hosted by Understanding Dan Story, DSHS- Everett (MOUs) that best [email protected] meet the needs of Community Relations 01/17/2020 North 7.01 Meeting Region 2’s Administrator/CSD/ESA scheduled to be hosted by Upper Skagit American Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • 1855 Treaty of Point Elliott
    Treaty of Point Elliott, 1855 Articles of agreement and convention made and concluded at Muckl-te-oh, or Point Elliott, in the territory of Washington, this twenty-second day of January, eighteen hundred and fifty-five, by Isaac I. Stevens, governor and superintendent of Indian affairs for the saidTerritory, on the part of the United States, and the undersigned chiefs, head-men and delegates of the Dwamish, Suquamish, Sk-kahl-mish, Sam-ahmish, Smalh-kamish, Skope-ahmish, St-kah-mish, Snoqualmoo, Skai-wha-mish, N'Quentl-ma-mish, Sk-tah-le-jum, Stoluck-wha-mish, Sno-ho-mish, Skagit, Kik-i-allus, Swin-a-mish, Squin-ah-mish, Sah-ku- mehu, Noo-wha-ha, Nook-wa-chah-mish, Mee-see-qua-guilch, Cho-bah-ah-bish, and othe allied and subordinate tribes and bands of Indians occupying certain lands situated in said Territory of Washington, on behalf of said tribes, and duly authorized by them. ARTICLE 1. The said tribes and bands of Indians hereby cede, relinquish, and convey to the United States all their right, title, and interest in and to the lands and country occupied by them, bounded and described as follows: Commencing at a point on the eastern side of Admiralty Inlet, known as Point Pully, about midway between Commencement and Elliott Bays; thence eastwardly, running along the north line of lands heretofore ceded to the United States by the Nisqually, Puyallup, and other Indians, to the summit of the Cascade range of mountains; thence northwardly, following the summit of said range to the 49th parallel of north latitude; thence west, along said
    [Show full text]
  • The Lummi Nation -- WRIA 1 (Mountains to the Sea)
    The Lummi Nation -- WRIA 1 (Mountains to the Sea) WRIA 1 is 1410 square miles in area: 832 square miles of WRIA 1 is in the Nooksack River watershed, the largest single watershed in the WRIA. Forty-nine square miles of the Nooksack watershed is in Canada. It has three main forks: the North, Middle, and South that Bellingham originate in the steep high-elevation headwaters of the North Cascades and flow westerly descending into flats of the Puget lowlands.The North and Middle Forks are glacial rivers and originate from Mount Baker. The South Fork is a snow/rain fed river and Watersheds of originates from the non-glaciated slope of theTwin Sisters peaks. The WRIA 01 Middle Fork flows into the North Fork upstream of where the North Fork confluences with the South Fork to form the mainstem Nooksack River. The mainstem then flows as a low-gradient, low-elevation river until discharging through the Lummi Nation and into Bellingham Bay. Historically, the Nooksack River alternated between discharging into Bellingham Bay, and flowing through the Lummi River and discharging into Lummi Bay (Collins and Sheikh 2002). The Nooksack River has five anadromous salmon species: pink, chum , Chinook , coho, sockeye; and three anadromous trout: steelhead, cutthroat and bull trout (Williams et al. 1975; Cutler et al. 2003). Drayton Blaine Harbor Whatcom County Lynden Land Zoning Everson Birch Bay Nooksack R. Urban Growth Area 4% of total land use NF Nooksack R. Agriculture Ferndale 8% of total land use Rural Residential Bellingham Deming 12% of total land use Lummi Lummi R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tribes of Washington State Map Download
    12 8 28 17 26 6 9 18 24 2 7 27 5 15 13 22 4 25 There are 29 federally-recognized Native American tribes 21 located on reservations throughout Washington state. 16 Each tribe has a body of elected officials that oversees its 20 governmental programs. They provide services including 14 health care, education, housing, public safety, courts, 10 transportation, natural resources, environment, culture 23 and economic development. Gaming revenue is a major source of funding to pay for tribal government services. 11 Tribes are investing in new initiatives to diversify their economic base. Investments range from hotels to golf 1 courses to shopping centers. 19 Tribes employ more than 30,000 people statewide and pay more than $1.5 billion annually in wages and benefits. Capital spending, and the purchase of goods and services from private companies, adds billions more dollars to the state’s economy each year. Tribal economic activities also generate millions of dollars in federal, state and local taxes. 29 Washingtontribes.org is a public education program of the Washington Indian Gaming Association. washingtontribes.org 3 1. Chehalis The Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis 4. Hoh The Hoh Tribe has 443 acres of 7. Lower Elwha Klallam The Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe is located on roughly 11. Nisqually The Nisqually Indian Tribe has more 14. Puyallup The Puyallup Tribe of Indians has more than 4,000 members and is 18. Sauk-Suiattle The Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe is located near Darrington and 22. Spokane The Spokane Tribe of Indians’ reservation is 159,000 acres located 26.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribes in the Pacific Northwest Region
    Tribes in the Pacific Northwest Region Tribe Full Name Tribe Alternate Name Tribe Contact Information Phone Web Site Burns Paiute Tribe Burns Paiute 100 Pasigo Street (541) 573-2088 http://www.burnspaiute-nsn.gov Burns, OR 97720-2442 Coeur D'Alene Tribe Coeur D'Alene P.O. Box 408 (208) 686-1800 http://www.cdatribe-nsn.gov/ 850 A Street Plummer, ID 83851-0408 Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of Confederated Salish P.O. Box 278 (406) 675-2700 http://www.cskt.org the Flathead Reservation 42487 Complex Boulevard Pablo, MT 59855-0278 Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Confederated Yakama P.O. Box 151 (509) 865-5121 http://www.yakamanation-nsn.gov Yakama Nation 401 Fort Road Toppenish, WA 98948-0151 Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Confederated Coos 1245 Fulton Avenue (541) 888-9577 http://www.ctclusi.org Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians Coos Bay, OR 97420 Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Siletz Tribe P.O. Box 549 (541) 444-2532 http://www.ctsi.nsn.us Oregon 201 SE Swan Avenue Siletz, OR 97380-0549 Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Chehalis P.O. Box 536 (360) 273-5911 http://www.chehalistribe.org Reservation 420 Howanut Road Oakville, WA 98568 Confederated Tribes of the Colville Confederated Colville P.O. Box 150 (509) 634-2200 http://www.colvilletribes.com Reservation 1 Colville Street Nespelem, WA 99155-0150 Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Grand Ronde Grand Ronde Tribes 9615 Grand Ronde Road (503) 879-5211 http://www.grandronde.org Community of Oregon Grand Ronde, OR 97347-9712 Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Umatilla Tribe Nixyaawii Governance Center46411 (541) 276-3165 http://www.umatilla.nsn.us Indian Reservation Ti'míne Way Pendleton, OR 97801-0638 Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Warms Springs Tribe P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Q4 2018 News Magazine
    w w sdukNewsalbix Magazine Issue #2 Winter Quarter 2018 In This Issue: • 20th Anniversary of Re-Recognition • Celebrating Tribal Heritage With The Snoqualmie Valley YMCA • Snoqualmie Welcomes N8tive Vote • And More! Call For Submissions Tribal Member News Here we present to you, the second issue of the new quarterly news magazine. We hope you are enjoying Northwest Native American Basketweavers Association reading the content and seeing the photos that this new, extended magazine format allows us to publish! Linda Sweet Baxter, Lois Sweet Dorman and McKenna Sweet Dorman traveled But as much as we like to write and enjoy creating content, we want this magazine to belong to all Tribal to Toppenish, WA to attend the Northwest Native American Basketweavers Members. If you have a story to tell or an item of news, art or photography you want to share please contact Association’s (NNABA) 24th annual gathering in October. us. We would be very happy to include your material in an upcoming issue of the magazine. They sat with Laura Wong-Whitebear, who was teaching coil weaving with Our e-mail address and our mailing address can be found in the blue box right below this space. You can hemp cord and waxed linen. contact us using either one. Please Welcome Rémy May! Christopher Castleberry and his wife Audrey Castleberry are honored to present their newest family member, Rémy May. Table of Contents sdukwalbixw News Magazine Staff Born on Nov. 27th she is 8lbs 6oz and 20.5 inches tall. Call For Submissions 2 Michael Brunk Here, dad and daughter are pictured at Snoqualmie Falls.
    [Show full text]
  • Nooksack Place Names Geography, Culture, and Language
    Nooksack Place Names Geography, Culture, and Language Allan Richardson and Brent Galloway Sample Material © 2011 UBC Press Noxwsá7aq Temíxw Pókw Nooksack Place Name Book Lhiyá kwes tse7ít xwhítsolh ilh ta Noxwsá7aq Temíxw tolí7 slhiyólh yestí7ixwólh. This here now is truly the history of the Nooksack Place Names from our late elders. Án7ma híkwt-as-kwm tíya s7aháynit ilh ta mókw’wát. It’ll be very important work for everyone. Ílholh ay ná7an kwóxwenalikw Selhám Líche7tsen qe sqw’ó7 ta Selhám Lawéchten. The authors were Mr. Allan Richardson along with Dr. Brent Galloway. S7aháynitas tíya Noxwsá7aq Temíxw Pókw tamatl’ótl’em qex syilánem, yalh as-híq’-as They worked on this Nooksack Place book for many years, finally it’s completed. Stl’í7-chalh kwes tson as7ísta tíya, “Yalh kwómalh as-hóy” ilh ta Selhám Líche7tsen qe Selhám Lawéchten kwes ay aháynitas tíya án7ma híkw syáyos. We want to say like this to Mr. Richardson and Dr. Galloway, “thank you” for working on this very important project. Ílh-olh-chalh kw ay wo7-aháyan-as tíya aslhq’ílnoxw ilh ta Lhéchalosemáwtxw-chalh. We are already using this information for our Lhéchalosem class. Íma ílh-olh-chalh kw ay wo7-aháyan-as tíya aslhq’ílnoxw ilh ta qalát ay welhtáchtxw-as welhnímelh xwhÍtsolh qe welhnímelh asláq’alhsólh. Also, we are already using this information for reclaiming our history and our culture. Tl’ósmas-kwom tse7ít-as tíya Pókw ay kwóxwen txwyátl’ slhiyólh sníchichim ilh ta Noxwsá7aq Stí7ti7ixw. Then so truly this book will help in the return of our language to the Nooksack People.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Census National Redistricting Data Summary File 2020 Census of Population and Housing
    2020 Census National Redistricting Data Summary File 2020 Census of Population and Housing Technical Documentation Issued February 2021 SFNRD/20-02 Additional For additional information concerning the Census Redistricting Data Information Program and the Public Law 94-171 Redistricting Data, contact the Census Redistricting and Voting Rights Data Office, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, 20233 or phone 1-301-763-4039. For additional information concerning data disc software issues, contact the COTS Integration Branch, Applications Development and Services Division, Census Bureau, Washington, DC, 20233 or phone 1-301-763-8004. For additional information concerning data downloads, contact the Dissemination Outreach Branch of the Census Bureau at <[email protected]> or the Call Center at 1-800-823-8282. 2020 Census National Redistricting Data Summary File Issued February 2021 2020 Census of Population and Housing SFNRD/20-01 U.S. Department of Commerce Wynn Coggins, Acting Agency Head U.S. CENSUS BUREAU Dr. Ron Jarmin, Acting Director Suggested Citation FILE: 2020 Census National Redistricting Data Summary File Prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau, 2021 TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION: 2020 Census National Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Technical Documentation Prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau, 2021 U.S. CENSUS BUREAU Dr. Ron Jarmin, Acting Director Dr. Ron Jarmin, Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer Albert E. Fontenot, Jr., Associate Director for Decennial Census Programs Deborah M. Stempowski, Assistant Director for Decennial Census Programs Operations and Schedule Management Michael T. Thieme, Assistant Director for Decennial Census Programs Systems and Contracts Jennifer W. Reichert, Chief, Decennial Census Management Division Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 51 Swinomish Brief
    Case 2:70-cv-09213-RSM Document 22200 Filed 05/29/20 Page 1 of 26 THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., No. C70-9213 Plaintiff, Subproceeding 19-1 vs. SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., COMMUNITY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND Defendant. PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Noting Date: July 31, 2020 Oral Argument Requested No. C70-9213, Subp. 19-1 Office of Tribal Attorney SITC MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY 11404 Moorage Way LaConner, Washington 98257 TEL 360/466-3163; FAX 360/466-5309 Case 2:70-cv-09213-RSM Document 22200 Filed 05/29/20 Page 2 of 26 1 2 I. MOTION 3 The Swinomish Indian Tribal Community (Swinomish) moves for summary judgment 4 declaring that the usual and accustomed fishing places (U&A) of the Lummi Nation (Lummi) do 5 not include the secluded waters to the east of Whidbey Island designated by the State as Shellfish 6 7 Region 2 East (Region 2E). This region encompasses five named bodies of water, Saratoga 8 Passage (Shellfish Management Area 24A), Port Susan (24B), Skagit Bay (24C), Holmes Harbor 9 (24D), and Possession Sound (26AE), and is depicted on p. 20 of this Motion. Swinomish also 10 moves for permanent injunctive relief enjoining Lummi from fishing or authorizing its members 11 to fish for any species in Region 2E. 12 The controlling and dispositive issue in this case is whether Judge Boldt intended to include 13 Region 2E in Lummi’s U&A in light of the record before him at the time the decision was made.
    [Show full text]
  • 57 Tulalip Tribes Brief
    Case 2:70-cv-09213-RSM Document 22208 Filed 05/29/20 Page 1 of 26 1 THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 AT SEATTLE 8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., Case No. C70-9213 9 Petitioners, Subproceeding No. 19-1 10 vs. TULALIP MOTION FOR SUMMARY 11 JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTION STATE OF WASHINGTON et al., 12 Noting Date: July 31, 2020 Respondent. 13 14 I. Motion 15 The Tulalip Tribes file this Motion for a Summary Judgment to prohibit the Lummi Nation 16 (“Lummi”) from engaging in any fishing for finfish or shellfish in Shellfish Region 2 East. Tulalip 17 also moves for a permanent injunction enjoining Lummi and its fishers from engaging in 18 any fishing in the named Region. 19 20 II. Background and Statement of the Case. 21 This subproceeding was triggered by recent Lummi attempts to engage in crab fisheries in Region 22 2E. In 2018, Lummi filed for a crab fishery in Region 2E. Most recently, Lummi scheduled an 23 opening on November 6, 2019. Lummi issued the regulation opening the Region 2 East crab 24 fishery even though it has never before fished for crab in Region 2 East and has not established a 25 right to fish there. See Lummi 2019-65 Region 2E Crab Regulation, attachment 2 hereto. That TULALIP MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Morisset Schlosser Jozwiak & Somerville Page 1 811 First Avenue, Suite 218 Civil Case No. C70-9213/Subproceeding 19-1 Seattle, WA 98104 206.386.5200 Case 2:70-cv-09213-RSM Document 22208 Filed 05/29/20 Page 2 of 26 1 particular opening was barred by a preliminary injunction filed by the court on December 3, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Black Bear' and 'Grizzly Bear'
    Salish words for ‘black bear’ and ‘grizzly bear’1 Jan P. van Eijk First Nations University of Canada Salish languages show a wide variety of names for ‘black bear’ and ‘grizzly bear.’ A number of these are doubtless of great antiquity and some of them may go back to Proto-Salish. However, reconstruction of the proto-forms seems problematic in light of inter-Salish and extra-Salish borrowing and of what appears to be rather massive taboo- driven lexical replacement. 1 Introduction The homeland of the Salish-speaking people, which stretches from southern British Columbia into northern Washington, Idaho and Montana, and formerly also into part of the Oregon coastal area, falls within the range of two types of bear that are native to north America, the black bear (Ursus americanus) and the grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis). In this article, we list the names of these bears in those Salish languages for which they have been recorded, and we try to trace their etymological history. 2 Individual languages In this section, the words for ‘black bear’ and ‘grizzly bear’ are listed for each language, and, where applicable, for individual dialects. Dialects are indicated with a long dash under their respective languages. However, in the case of Kalispel and Flathead (listed under Spokane), the long dash indicates that these linguistic entities are part of a dialect continuum with Spokane, and not dialects of Spokane. Comments on details and provenance of the various forms are given in sections 3-5. In the table on pp. 2-3, words in the Amerindianist Phonetic Alphabet (APA) are sans-serif and roman, while the pre-APA forms are serif and roman.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Quinault Tribe of Indians on Its Own Behalf and on Behalf of the Queets Band of Indians, Et Al., Intervenor-Plaintiffs, V
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Quinault Tribe of Indians on its own behalf and on behalf of the Queets Band of Indians, et al., Intervenor-Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, Defendant, Thor C. Tollefson, Director, Washington State Department of Fisheries, et al., Intervenor-Defendants Civ. No. 9213 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, TACOMA DIVISION 384 F. Supp. 312; 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12291 February 12, 1974 SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: [**1] On Question Per Reconsideration Motion March 22, 1974. COUNSEL: Stan Pitkin, U.S. Atty., Stuart F. Pierson, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., Seattle, Washington, for the U.S.; George D. Dysart, Asst. Regional Sol., U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Portland, Oregon, of counsel. David H. Getches, Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, Colorado, and John H. Sennhauser, Legal Services Center, Seattle, Washington, for Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Squaxin Island Tribe of Indians, Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe, Skokomish Indian Tribe, Stillaguamish Indian Tribe. Alvin J. Ziontz, Ziontz, Pirtle, Morisset & Ernstoff, Seattle, Washington, for Makah Indian Tribe, Lummi Indian Tribe, Quileute Indian Tribe. Michael Taylor, Taholah, Washington, for Quinault Tribe of Indians. James B. Hovis, Hovis, Cockrill & Roy, Yakima, Washington, for Yakima Indian Tribe. Lester Stritmatter, Stritmatter & Stritmatter, Hoquiam, Washington, for Hoh Tribe of Indians. William A. Stiles, Jr., Sedro-Woolley, Washington, for Upper Skagit River Tribe. Slade Gorton, Atty. Gen., Edward B. Mackie, Deputy Atty. Gen., Olympia, Washington, for State of Washington. Joseph Larry Coniff, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Game, Olympia, Washington, [**2] for Game Defendants & Carl Crouse. Earl R. McGimpsey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept.
    [Show full text]