The Treaty of the Treaty of Point Elliott Assembly Lesson Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Treaty of the Treaty of Point Elliott Assembly Lesson Plan The Treaty of Point Elliott Assembly Lesson By: Lena Jones, HCC Curator Tulalip News, syǝcǝb Patkanim Governor Stevens Bonaparte (Sna-talc) Student’s Section: diƚǝxᵂ ƚushuylǝp (This is what you folks will do.): 1) Song (Optional) In Coast Salish teachings, all good work begins with a song or prayer. The class can sing a song before the lesson begins. • A song is considered a gift. It can be any song the students, or some of the students, or even one of the students is willing to share. Sing or listen to the song. 2) Assembly Read the following four accounts of the Treaty of Point Elliott assembly and treaty signing in 1855. Complete the questions in the chart noting the different perspectives. POINT ELLIOTT TREATY Clinton Snowden, "The Point Elliott Treaty," History of Washington. The Rise and Progress of an American State. New York: Century History Company, 1909. Volume III p. 276-77. (After the completion of the work of the Medicine Creek Treaty governor Isaac I. Stevens dispatched Simmons, Shaw, Cushman, Cock and Ford to assemble the remaining tribes of the Nisqually Nation at Point Elliott for a second council.). This was assembled on January 12th and continued until the 21st. No special difficulty was encountered in the negotiations, but nearly 2,300 Indians were present, and many speeches were made. The governor first explained the purpose of the council as before, and was followed by Colonel Simmons, who spoke the Chinook Jargon, a language which they nearly all understood, and by Secretary Mason. The Indians then sang a mass, after the Catholic form, and recited a prayer, after which the treaty was read and interpreted sentence by sentence by Colonel Shaw. When the reading was concluded the chiefs were invited to express their opinions, and to suggest any modifications they might wish to have made. Seattle, chief of the Duwamish tribes, Patkanim, the chief of the Snoqualmies, who had been present at, and is supposed to have planned the attack on Fort Nisqually in which Wallace was killed a few years earlier, Chow-it-hoot, Goliah and others expressed themselves, generally approving what was proposed, and when all had finished the treaty was signed, first by Governor Stevens, and then by the chiefs, headmen and witnesses as before. This treaty provided for the payment of $150,000 in annuities and $15,000 for improving the reservations and removing the Indians to them, and for two reservations of two sections each, one near Port Madison, and one on the east side of Fidalgo Island; also for one comprising the peninsula at the southeastern end of Perry Island, and another occupying the delta formed by the Lummi, or Nooksack River. A special reservation of a whole township, of thirty-six sections, was also made on the north side of the Snohomish River at its mouth, "for the purpose of establishing thereon an agricultural and industrial school, and with the view of ultimately drawing thereto, and settling thereon, all the Indians living west of the Cascade Mountains in said territory. POINT ELLIOTT COUNCIL Kent D. Richards, "The Point Elliott Council," Isaac I. Stevens, young man in a hurry. Provo: Brigham Young University, 1979. p. 202-204. In mid-January many of the Indians began to gather at Point Elliott. The Snohomish and Snoqualmie Indians welcomed newcomers with impressive ceremony as they lined up on the beach in single file and greeted each man with the sign of the cross. After dark there was continuous singing and preaching, and George Gibbs commented, "They did very well as regards tune and in the open air their hymns or rather canticles have quite a good effect.” "The Indians are all at present in an exceedingly pious frame of mind and are evidently brushing up their religion for a grand display on the Governor's arrival." On January 17 the Duwamish Indians made their appearance, and four days later Stevens arrived. Gibbs drew up a draft incorporating the same general provisions as the Medicine Creek treaty with the reservations based on investigations Gibbs had made the previous week. Of 3,000 Indians covered by this treaty about 2,300 were on the treaty grounds; those missing were mainly children and old people-and the Nooksack Indians, who were not contacted because of cold weather and frozen rivers. On January 22 the council began with the four chiefs whom the whites considered most important seated in the front rank: Seattle (Duwamish League), Patkanim (Snoqualmie), Goliah (Skagit), and Chow-its-hoot (Lummi). The subchiefs were seated next and the rest were grouped behind without specific order. Stevens, as usual, opened the council with an address. He began, "My Children! You are not my children because you are the fruit of my loins, but because you are children for whom I have the same feeling as if you were the fruit of my loins. You are my children for whom I will strenuously labor all the days of my life until I shall be taken hence." The father-child analogy became a favorite with Stevens, and he stressed it in subsequent councils on the Sound. Whatever reactions the Indians may have had, it is the key to understanding Stevens' view of the Indians. He believed that they, like children, had not yet reached the status of adulthood with its rights and responsibilities, and that they needed care and guidance until they achieved full growth and maturity. He did not assume that they were inherently inferior, but that they had not yet reached the full potential of human development. Also, like children, they should obey their father which meant that good behavior should be rewarded and bad conduct punished. As at Medicine Creek, Stevens carefully explained the desires of the "Great Father," the provisions of the treaty, and the necessity to send the treaty to the nation's capital for final approval before it could take effect. After the governor finished, each of the four chiefs spoke, and all indicated their approbation. The commissioners went through the treaty item by item, and before evening the document had been signed. The next morning the governor's men distributed presents while Chief Seattle in return presented a white flag to Stevens and declared, "Now by this we make friends and put away all bad feelings if we ever had any. We are the friends of the Americans. All the Indians are of the same mind. They look upon you as our father. We will never change our minds." POINT ELLIOTT TREATY, ANCESTRAL COMMITMENT, A Longhouse Perspective In Coast Salish societies, it was appropriate to welcome visitors to your land or your place. Our ancestors had well developed diplomatic and political traditions for all matters. They recognized one another as distinct nations and honored one another by respecting one another and one another’s beliefs. The treaty signing event was held in January, a holy time for our people, when we share words of encouragement, sing our beautiful spirit songs, and offer prayers for our communities. In Coast Salish culture, our elders tell us all good things begin with a song or prayer. When done so, the Spirit is with us. To our ancestors, when the treaty signing was opened with a prayer and song, it symbolized the sacredness of the process. In this manner, with the presence of the Sacred as a witness, it reflected a serious matter; and our teaching is that all must put aside their differences and work toward good. While many understood the Chinook Jargon language, it was a trade language and had a limited vocabulary. The treaty was translated from English to Chinook Jargon, then from Chinook Jargon to the languages of the people. Ancestral languages of the people who attended included Northern Lushootseed, Southern Lushootseed, Twana, Halkomelem, Northern Straits Salish, with various dialects among the language groups. Our stories tell us when the Creator was spreading languages, he liked this area so much, he tossed the remaining languages he had here and stayed. When Governor Stevens asked the leaders to speak, in the eyes of our ancestors, it was affirming the process and the assurance of the agreements made. In Coast Salish cultures, when people are asked to speak, it is bearing witness to the event, symbolizing the significance and allowing them to be the eyes and ears of the land. It is their job to carry the message back to their communities and later to recall what they’ve seen and heard in the event. When gifts were given, it was finalizing the event and avowing the good will and good faith of the agreement in the eyes of our ancestors. Done and witnessed in this manner, our ancestors felt the promises were meant to be kept for all time. It became a sacred commitment according to our culture, more akin to a covenant. Lena Jones, MaOM, HCC Education Curator We didn’t have laws. We had teachings. Eugene Harry, Malahat Elder, HCC Lecture Series, 2016 Anybody. All people. All cultures. We have such diverse peoples living in this country, in our communities. How do we best learn to live together? Well, you keep your promises first. From there, you learn to live together. Darrell Hillaire, Lummi Elder, HCC Film Series, 2015 All are related. Our elders tell us the Europeans are our brother – basically our younger brother, and we have to help him understand how to take care of the earth and understand that, in this universe, all things are connected and everything is spiritual. Spencer Martin, Methow Elder, HCC Lecture Series, 2012 POINT ELLIOTT TREATY’S 150TH BIRTHDAY: A CAUSE FOR CELEBRATION By Sherry Guydelkon, Tulalip See-Yaht-Sub, January 19, 2005 According to the historical record, 4,992 native people took part in the negotiation of the Point Elliott Treaty in 1855.
Recommended publications
  • North: Lummi, Nooksack, Samish, Sauk-Suiattle, Stillaguamish
    Policy 7.01 Implementation Plan Region 2 North (R2N) Community Services Division (CSD) Serving the following Tribes: Lummi Nation, Nooksack Indian Tribe, Samish Indian Nation, Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe, Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians, Swinomish Tribal Community, Tulalip Tribes, & Upper Skagit Indian Tribe Biennium Timeframe: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Revised 04/2021 Annual Key Due Dates: April 1st - CSD Regional Administrators submit 7.01 Plan and Progress Reports (PPRs) to CSD HQ Coordinator. April 13th – CSD HQ Coordinator will submit Executive Summary & 7.01 PPRs to the ESA Office of Assistant Secretary for final review. April 23rd - ESA Office of the Assistant Secretary will send all 7.01 PPRs to Office of Indian Policy (OIP). 7.01 Meetings: January 17th- Cancelled due to inclement weather Next scheduled meeting April 17th, hosted by the Nooksack Indian Tribe. 07/07/20 Virtual 7.01 meeting. 10/16/20 7.01 Virtual meeting 01/15/21 7.01 Virtual 04/16/21 7.01 Virtual 07/16/21 7.01 Virtual Implementation Plan Progress Report Status Update for the Fiscal Year Goals/Objectives Activities Expected Outcome Lead Staff and Target Date Starting Last July 1 Revised 04/2021 Page 1 of 27 1. Work with tribes Lead Staff: to develop Denise Kelly 08/16/2019 North 7.01 Meeting hosted by services, local [email protected] , Tulalip Tribes agreements, and DSHS/CSD Tribal Liaison Memorandums of 10/18/2019 North 7.01 Meeting hosted by Understanding Dan Story, DSHS- Everett (MOUs) that best [email protected] meet the needs of Community Relations 01/17/2020 North 7.01 Meeting Region 2’s Administrator/CSD/ESA scheduled to be hosted by Upper Skagit American Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • Section II Community Profile
    Section II: Community Profile Section II Community Profile Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010 Update 9 [this page intentionally left blank] 10 Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010 Update Section II: Community Profile Community Profile Disclaimer: The Tulalip Tribes Tribal/State Hazard Mitigation Plan covers all the people, property, infrastructure and natural environment within the exterior boundaries of the Tulalip Reservation as established by the Point Elliott Treaty of January 22, 1855 and by Executive Order of December 23, 1873, as well as any property owned by the Tulalip Tribes outside of this area. Furthermore the Plan covers the Tulalip Tribes Usual and Accustom Fishing areas (U&A) as determined by Judge Walter E. Craig in United States of America et. al., plaintiffs v. State of Washington et. al., defendant, Civil 9213 Phase I, Sub Proceeding 80-1, “In Re: Tulalip Tribes’ Request for Determination of Usual and Accustom Fishing Places.” This planning scope does not limit in any way the Tulalip Tribes’ hazard mitigation and emergency management planning concerns or influence. This section will provide detailed information on the history, geography, climate, land use, population and economy of the Tulalip Tribes and its Reservation. Tulalip Reservation History Archaeologists and historians estimate that Native Americans arrived from Siberia via the Bering Sea land bridge beginning 17,000 to 11,000 years ago in a series of migratory waves during the end of the last Ice Age. Indians in the region share a similar cultural heritage based on a life focused on the bays and rivers of Puget Sound. Throughout the Puget Sound region, While seafood was a mainstay of the native diet, cedar trees were the most important building material.there were Cedar numerous was used small to tribesbuild both that subsistedlonghouses on and salmon, large halibut,canoes.
    [Show full text]
  • Battlefields & Treaties
    welcome to Indian Country Take a moment, and look up from where you are right now. If you are gazing across the waters of Puget Sound, realize that Indian peoples thrived all along her shoreline in intimate balance with the natural world, long before Europeans arrived here. If Mount Rainier stands in your view, realize that Indian peoples named it “Tahoma,” long before it was “discovered” by white explorers. Every mountain that you see on the horizon, every stand of forest, every lake and river, every desert vista in eastern Washington, all of these beautiful places are part of our Indian heritage, and carry the songs of our ancestors in the wind. As we have always known, all of Washington State is Indian Country. To get a sense of our connection to these lands, you need only to look at a map of Washington. Over 75 rivers, 13 counties, and hundreds of cities and towns all bear traditional Indian names – Seattle, Tacoma, Yakima, and Spokane among them. Indian peoples guided Lewis and Clark to the Pacifi c, and pointed them safely back to the east. Indian trails became Washington’s earliest roads. Wild salmon, delicately grilled and smoked in Alderwood, has become the hallmark of Washington State cuisine. Come visit our lands, and come learn about our cultures and our peoples. Our families continue to be intimately woven into the world around us. As Tribes, we will always fi ght for preservation of our natural resources. As Tribes, we will always hold our elders and our ancestors in respect. As Tribes, we will always protect our treaty rights and sovereignty, because these are rights preserved, at great sacrifi ce, ABOUT ATNI/EDC by our ancestors.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Seattle's Speech Historylink.Org Essay 1427
    Chief Seattle's Speech HistoryLink.org Essay 1427 By Walt Crowley, June 28, 1999 In addition to his namesake city, Chief Seattle (178?-1866) is best remembered for a speech given, according to pioneer Dr. Henry Smith, on the occasion of an 1854 visit to Seattle of Isaac Stevens (1818-1862). Stevens was governor and Commissioner of Indian Affairs of Washington Territory. He visited in January and again in March 1854. Chief Seattle's speech went unnoted in the written record until October 29, 1887, when the Seattle Sunday Starpublished a text reconstructed from admittedly incomplete notes by Dr. Smith. Smith rendered his memory of Chief Seattle's speech in the rather ornate (to modern ears) English of Victorian oratory. Chief Seattle would have given the speech in the Lushootseed language, which then would have been translated into Chinook Indian trade language, and then into English. Smith's text is a necessarily filtered version of the speech and was certainly embellished by him. Smith's reconstruction lacks corroboration in the written record, but it is far from implausible. Seattle was well respected among his own people and settlers as a powerful and eloquent orator in his native tongue. It is likely that he was present to meet Governor Stevens in January 1854. Stevens' assistant George Gibbs noted his presence during the March 11, 1854 meeting. Also, there are several accounts in pioneer records of Chief Seattle giving speeches to large crowds. Frederick James Grant included Smith's text in his 1891 History of Seattle, Washington and Clarence B. Bagley reprinted a slightly altered version in his 1929 History of King County, Washington(Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Duwamish Superfund HIA Tribal Report Final June 2013 Clean
    Health Impact Assessment Proposed Cleanup Plan for the Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site Technical Report September, 2013 (Final version) Assessment and Recommendations Effects of the proposed cleanup plan on Tribes Duwamish Superfund HIA – Technical Report: Tribes (Final version; September 2013) Technical report This technical report supports our HIA Final Report, published in September, 2013. This technical report is identical to the version that accompanied our Public Comment HIA Report, which was submitted to EPA on June 13, 2013. Acknowledgment and disclaimer We are indebted to the many agencies, organizations, and individuals who have contributed their time, information, and expertise to this project. This project and report were supported by a grant from the Health Impact Project, a collaboration oF the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts; and also by the Rohm & Haas Professorship in Public Health Sciences, sponsored by the Rohm & Haas Company of Philadelphia. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Health Impact Project, The Pew Charitable Trusts, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, or the Rohm & Haas Company. Health Impact Assessment authors William Daniell University of Washington Linn Gould * Just Health Action BJ Cummings Duwamish River Cleanup Coalition/Technical Advisory Group Jonathan Childers University of Washington Amber Lenhart University of Washington * Primary author(s) for this technical report. Suggested citation Gould L, Cummings BJ, Daniell W, Lenhart A, Childers J. Health Impact Assessment: Proposed Cleanup Plan for the Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site; Technical Report: Effects of the proposed cleanup plan on Tribes. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Just Health Action, and Duwamish River Cleanup Coalition/Technical Advisory Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Library Directions: Volume 13, No
    Library Directions: Volume 13, No. 2 a newsletter of the Spring 2003 University of Washington Libraries Library Directions is produced two times a year Letter from the Director by UW Libraries staff. Inquiries concerning content should be sent to: Library Directions All books are rare books. —Ivan Doig (2002) University of Washington Libraries Box 352900 In Ivan Doig’s compelling essay in this issue of Library Directions, he Seattle, WA 98195-2900 (206) 543-1760 reminds us that “all books are rare books.” We run the risk of losing ([email protected]) the lore, the curiosity, and uniqueness of each author’s insights if we Paul Constantine, Managing Editor Susan Kemp, Editor, Photographer don’t adequately preserve and make accessible the range of human Diana Johnson, Mark Kelly, Stephanie Lamson, eff ort through our libraries. Just as all books are rare books, all digital Mary Mathiason, Mary Whiting, Copy Editors publications are potentially rare publications. We run the same risk of Library Directions is available online at www.lib.washington.edu/about/libdirections/current/. seeing digital scholarship evaporate if we don’t archive and preserve Several sources are used for mailing labels. Please pass the new and evolving forms of publication. multiple copies on to others or return the labels of the unwanted copies to Library Directions. Addresses containing UW campus box numbers were obtained from the HEPPS database and corrections should On March 9-11, the University Libraries hosted a retreat on digital scholarship. Made possible be sent to your departmental payroll coordinator. through the generous funding of the Andrew W.
    [Show full text]
  • CONFEDERATED TRIBES and BANDS Nos
    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS Nos. 19-35807 OF THE YAKAMA NATION, a 19-35821 sovereign federally recognized Native Nation, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant/ 1:17-cv-03192- Cross-Appellee, TOR v. OPINION KLICKITAT COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington; KLICKITAT COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, an agency of Klickitat County; BOB SONGER, in his official capacity; KLICKITAT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, an agency of Klickitat County; DAVID QUESNEL, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees/ Cross-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted November 20, 2020 Seattle, Washington 2 YAKAMA NATION V. KLICKITAT CNTY. Filed June 11, 2021 Before: Ronald M. Gould and Michelle T. Friedland, Circuit Judges, and Jill A. Otake,* District Judge. Opinion by Judge Friedland SUMMARY** Tribal Reservation Affirming the district court’s judgment entered following a bench trial, the panel held that under an 1855 treaty between the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation and the United States, the Yakama Reservation includes a tract, known as Tract D, that partially overlaps with Klickitat County, Washington. The parties’ dispute arose when the County attempted to prosecute P.T.S., a minor and enrolled member of the Tribe, for acts that occurred within Tract D. Pursuant to a proclamation issued by the Governor of Washington, the Yakamas and the federal government share exclusive jurisdiction over certain criminal and civil offenses that occur on Reservation lands. The Yakamas sued the County and County officials, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief barring the County from exercising criminal * The Honorable Jill A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Artists' View of Seattle
    WHERE DOES SEATTLE’S CREATIVE COMMUNITY GO FOR INSPIRATION? Allow us to introduce some of our city’s resident artists, who share with you, in their own words, some of their favorite places and why they choose to make Seattle their home. Known as one of the nation’s cultural centers, Seattle has more arts-related businesses and organizations per capita than any other metropolitan area in the United States, according to a recent study by Americans for the Arts. Our city pulses with the creative energies of thousands of artists who call this their home. In this guide, twenty-four painters, sculptors, writers, poets, dancers, photographers, glass artists, musicians, filmmakers, actors and more tell you about their favorite places and experiences. James Turrell’s Light Reign, Henry Art Gallery ©Lara Swimmer 2 3 BYRON AU YONG Composer WOULD YOU SHARE SOME SPECIAL CHILDHOOD MEMORIES ABOUT WHAT BROUGHT YOU TO SEATTLE? GROWING UP IN SEATTLE? I moved into my particular building because it’s across the street from Uptown I performed in musical theater as a kid at a venue in the Seattle Center. I was Espresso. One of the real draws of Seattle for me was the quality of the coffee, I nine years old, and I got paid! I did all kinds of shows, and I also performed with must say. the Civic Light Opera. I was also in the Northwest Boy Choir and we sang this Northwest Medley, and there was a song to Ivar’s restaurant in it. When I was HOW DOES BEING A NON-DRIVER IMPACT YOUR VIEW OF THE CITY? growing up, Ivar’s had spokespeople who were dressed up in clam costumes with My favorite part about walking is that you come across things that you would pass black leggings.
    [Show full text]
  • SOCIAL UNDERSTANDING and CULTURAL AWARENESS JIM WOODS, DIRECTOR of TRIBAL AFFAIRS, SPECIAL ASSISTANT to the DIRECTOR Native American Tribes Are Here
    Working with Tribes SOCIAL UNDERSTANDING AND CULTURAL AWARENESS JIM WOODS, DIRECTOR OF TRIBAL AFFAIRS, SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE DIRECTOR Native American Tribes are here 574 Recognized Tribes in the United States 29 Federally Recognized Tribes in Washington 21 + 2 Treaty Tribes 8 Executive Order Tribes Tribes with Fishing Rights 24 Tribes with off-reservation Hunting Rights Out of State Tribes with rights in Washington Working with our tribal partners The overview: History of Tribal Governments Cultural Relevance & Differences Awareness of Native Lifeways Social Characteristics Stewardship Shared Management and Responsibilities Professional Perspective Resiliency Culture is not a divide. Although Indian tribes are sovereign, that sovereignty is not absolute. It has been challenged, defined, and battled over throughout U.S. history. History of Tribal Governments Tribes have been on this Continent and here in the Pacific Northwest for thousands of years. Historically the Makah believe Orca transformed into a wolf, and thus transforming again into Man. Pre-1492: Pre-Columbus Period Native people lived in organized societies with their own forms of governance for thousands of years before contact with Europeans. Historic Ancient Chinese Explorers traded with WA Coastal Tribes early 1400’s 1513- Spanish explorer Vasco Núñez de Balboa, the first European to sight the Pacific Ocean, when he claimed all lands adjoining this ocean for the Spanish Crown. In the vicinity of the Duwamish River and Elliott Bay where in 1851 the first U.S. settlers began building log cabins, the Duwamish tribe occupied at least 17 villages. The first non-Natives to settle the area were farmers who selected their claims on the Duwamish River on September 16, 1851.
    [Show full text]
  • © Copyright 2016 William Gregory Guedel
    © Copyright 2016 William Gregory Guedel Sovereignty, Political Economy, and Economic Development in Native American Nations William Gregory Guedel A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2016 Reading Committee: José Antonio Lucero, Chair Saadia Pekkanen Glennys Young Program Authorized to Offer Degree: The Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies University of Washington Abstract Sovereignty, Political Economy, and Economic Development in Native American Nations William Gregory Guedel Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Associate Professor José Antonio Lucero The Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies The severe and chronic lag in the empirical indicators for Native American socio-economic development has created, in the words of President Obama, “a moral call to action.” Although collective statistics indicate substantial development problems among the 566 federally recognized tribes, these empirical indicators do not manifest uniformly across all Native American nations. This prompts a basic but crucial question: Why are some Native American nations developing more successfully than others? This dissertation examines the theoretical basis and practical applications of tribal sovereignty and presents a new methodology for analyzing the development conditions within Native American nations, utilizing a qualitative assessment of the relative state of a tribe’s formal institutional development and informal institutional dynamics. These foundational elements of the tribal political economy—rather than any specific economic activities—are the prime determinants of a tribe’s development potential. Tribal governments that emphasize the advancement of their institutional structures and the strengthening of citizen cooperation within their communities are more likely to achieve their self-directed development goals, and this paper provides specific examples and recommendations for enhancing sustainable economic development within a tribal political economy.
    [Show full text]
  • King County and Western Washington Cultural Geography, Communities, Their History and Traditions - Unit Plan
    Northwest Heritage Resources King County and Western Washington Cultural Geography, Communities, Their History and Traditions - Unit Plan Enduring Cultures Unit Overview: Students research the cultural geographies of Native Americans living in King County and the Puget Sound region of Washington (Puget Salish), then compare/contrast the challenges and cultures of Native American groups in King County and Puget Sound to those of Asian immigrant groups in the same region. Used to its fullest, this unit will take nine to ten weeks to complete. Teachers may also elect to condense/summarize some of the materials and activities in the first section (teacher-chosen document-based exploration of Native American cultures) in order to focus on the student-directed research component. List of individual lesson plans: Session # Activity/theme 1 Students create fictional Native American families, circa 1820-1840, of NW coastal peoples. 2* Students introduce the characters, develop their biographies as members of specific tribes (chosen from those in the Northwest Heritage Resources website searchable database) 3* The fictional characters will practice a traditional art. Research NWHR database to browse possibilities, select one. Each student will learn something about the specific form s/he chose for his/her characters. Students will also glean from actual traditional artists' biographies what sorts of challenges the artists have faced and what sorts of goals they have that are related to their cultural traditions and communities. 4* Cultural art forms: Students deepen their knowledge of one or more art forms. 5 Teacher creates basic frieze: large map of Oregon territory and Canadian islands/ coastal region.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Ceded Areas in Washington State
    Blaine Lynden Sumas Fern- Nooksack Oroville Metaline dale Northport Everson Falls Lummi Nation Metaline Ione Tribal Ceded Areas Bellingham Nooksack Tribe Tonasket by Treaty or Executive Order Marcus Samish Upper Kettle Republic Falls Indian Skagit Sedro- Friday Woolley Hamilton Conconully Harbor Nation Tribe Lyman Concrete Makah Colville Anacortes Riverside Burlington Tribe Winthrop Kalispel Mount Vernon Cusick Tribe La Omak Swinomish Conner Twisp Tribe Okanogan Colville Chewelah Oak Stan- Harbor wood Confederated Lower Elwha Coupeville Darrington Sauk-Suiattle Newport Arlington Tribes Klallam Port Angeles The Tulalip Tribe Stillaguamish Nespelem Tribe Tribes Port Tribe Brewster Townsend Granite Marysville Falls Springdale Quileute Sequim Jamestown Langley Forks Pateros Tribe S'Klallam Lake Stevens Spokane Bridgeport Elmer City Deer Everett Tribe Tribe Park Mukilteo Snohomish Grand Hoh Monroe Sultan Coulee Port Mill Chelan Creek Tribe Edmonds Gold Bothell + This map does not depict + Gamble Bar tribally asserted Index Mansfield Wilbur Creston S'Klallam Tribe Woodinville traditional hunting areas. Poulsbo Suquamish Millwood Duvall Skykomish Kirk- Hartline Almira Reardan Airway Tribe land Redmond Carnation Entiat Heights Spokane Medical Bainbridge Davenport Tribal Related Boundaries Lake Island Seattle Sammamish Waterville Leavenworth Coulee City Snoqualmie Duwamish Waterway Bellevue Bremerton Port Orchard Issaquah North Cheney Harrington Quinault Renton Bend Cashmere Rockford Burien Wilson Nation
    [Show full text]