DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 84/Wednesday, May 1, 2013/Notices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 84/Wednesday, May 1, 2013/Notices Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 1, 2013 / Notices 25471 Shawnee Tribe; The Muscogee (Creek) objects were removed from King Puyallup Reservation; Quileute Tribe of Nation; The Seminole Nation of County, WA. the Quileute Reservation; Quinault Oklahoma; Thlopthlocco Tribal Town; This notice is published as part of the Indian Nation (previously listed as the Tunica-Biloxi Indian Tribe; and United National Park Service’s administrative Quinault Tribe of the Quinault Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 Reservation, Washington); Sauk-Suiattle Oklahoma that this notice has been U.S.C. 3003(d)(3) and 43 CFR 10.11(d). Indian Tribe; Shoalwater Bay Indian published. The determinations in this notice are Tribe of the Shoalwater Bay Indian the sole responsibility of the museum, Dated: April 2, 2013. Reservation (previously listed as the institution, or Federal agency that has Shoalwater Bay Tribe of the Shoalwater Sherry Hutt, control of the Native American human Bay Indian Reservation, Washington); Manager, National NAGPRA Program. remains. The National Park Service is Skokomish Indian Tribe (previously [FR Doc. 2013–10221 Filed 4–30–13; 8:45 am] not responsible for the determinations listed as the Skokomish Indian Tribe of BILLING CODE 4312–50–P in this notice. the Skokomish Reservation, Consultation Washington); Spokane Tribe of the Spokane Reservation; Squaxin Island DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR A detailed assessment of the human Tribe of the Squaxin Island Reservation; remains and associated funerary objects National Park Service Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians of was made by the Burke Museum and Washington (previously listed as [NPS–WASO–NAGPRA–11978; University of Washington professional Stillaguamish Tribe of Washington); PPWOCRADN0–PCU00RP14.R50000] staff in consultation with Suquamish Indian Tribe of the Port representatives of the Lummi Tribe of Madison Reservation; Swinomish Notice of Inventory Completion: the Lummi Reservation; Muckleshoot Indians of the Swinomish Reservation of University of Washington, Department Indian Tribe (previously listed as the Washington; Tulalip Tribes of of Anthropology, Seattle, WA Muckleshoot Indian Tribe of the Washington (previously listed as the Muckleshoot Reservation, Washington); AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. Tulalip Tribes of the Tulalip Nooksack Indian Tribe; Samish Indian ACTION: Notice. Reservation, Washington); and the Nation (previously listed as the Samish Upper Skagit Indian Tribe (hereafter all SUMMARY: The University of Indian Tribe, Washington); Sauk- tribes listed in this section are referred Washington, Department of Suiattle Indian Tribe; Stillaguamish to as ‘‘The Consulted and Notified Anthropology, has completed an Tribe of Indians of Washington Tribes’’). inventory of human remains and (previously listed as the Stillaguamish associated funerary objects, in Tribe of Washington); Suquamish History and Description of the Remains consultation with the appropriate Indian Tribe of the Port Madison In 1964, human remains representing, Indian tribes, and has determined that Reservation; Swinomish Indians of the at minimum, one individual (Specimen there is no cultural affiliation between Swinomish Reservation of Washington; #9) were removed from Kent, WA. No the remains and any present-day Indian Tulalip Tribes of Washington known individuals were identified. The tribe. Representatives of any Indian tribe (previously listed as the Tulalip Tribes one associated funerary object is one lot that believes itself to be culturally of the Tulalip Reservation, Washington); of non-human bone. and the Upper Skagit Indian Tribe. In affiliated with the human remains and Determinations Made by the University associated funerary objects may contact 1995, as part of the NAGPRA compliance process, these remains were of Washington, Department of the Burke Museum acting on behalf of Anthropology the University of Washington, reported to the Confederated Tribes and Department of Anthropology. Bands of the Yakama Nation; Officials of the University of Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Disposition of the human remains and Washington, Department of Reservation; Confederated Tribes of the associated funerary objects to the Indian Anthropology, have determined that: Colville Reservation; Hoh Indian Tribe • tribes stated below may occur if no Based on cranial and dental (previously listed as the Hoh Indian additional requestors come forward. morphology, the human remains are Tribe of the Hoh Indian Reservation, Native American. DATES: Representatives of any Indian Washington); Jamestown S’Klallam • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), a tribe that believes it has a cultural Tribe; Kalispel Indian Community of the relationship of shared group identity affiliation with the human remains and Kalispel Reservation; Lower Elwha cannot be reasonably traced between the associated funerary objects should Tribal Community (previously listed as Native American human remains and contact the University of Washington at the Lower Elwha Tribal Community of any present-day Indian tribe. the address below by May 31, 2013. the Lower Elwha Reservation, • According to final judgments of the ADDRESSES: Dr. Peter Lape, Burke Washington); Lummi Tribe of the Indian Claims Commission, the land Museum, University of Washington, Box Lummi Reservation; Makah Indian Tribe from which the Native American human 353010, Seattle, WA 98195, telephone of the Makah Indian Reservation; remains and associated funerary objects (206) 685–3849. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (previously were removed is the aboriginal land of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is listed as the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe here given in accordance with the of the Muckleshoot Reservation, (previously listed as the Muckleshoot Native American Graves Protection and Washington); Nisqually Indian Tribe Indian Tribe of the Muckleshoot Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. (previously listed as the Nisqually Reservation, Washington). 3003, of the completion of an inventory Indian Tribe of the Nisqually • The Point Elliot Treaty of January of human remains and associated Reservation, Washington); Nooksack 22, 1855, was signed by representatives funerary objects under the control of the Indian Tribe; Port Gamble Band of from the Lummi Tribe of the Lummi University of Washington, Department S’Klallam Indians (previously listed as Reservation; Muckleshoot Indian Tribe of Anthropology and in the physical the Port Gamble Indian Community of (previously listed as the Muckleshoot custody of the Burke Museum. The the Port Gamble Reservation, Indian Tribe of the Muckleshoot human remains and associated funerary Washington); Puyallup Tribe of the Reservation, Washington); Nooksack VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:21 Apr 30, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM 01MYN1 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 25472 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 1, 2013 / Notices Indian Tribe; Samish Indian Nation The University of Washington, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: (previously listed as the Samish Indian Department of Anthropology is OMB Control Number: 1010–0106. Tribe, Washington); Sauk-Suiattle responsible for notifying The Consulted Title: 30 CFR Part 553, Oil Spill Indian Tribe; Stillaguamish Tribe of and Notified Tribes that this notice has Financial Responsibility for Offshore Indians of Washington (previously been published. Facilities. listed as the Stillaguamish Tribe of Dated: April 2, 2013. Forms: BOEM–1016, 1017, 1018, Washington); Suquamish Indian Tribe Sherry Hutt, 1019, 1020, 1021, and 1022. of the Port Madison Reservation; Manager, National NAGPRA Program. Swinomish Indians of the Swinomish Abstract: This information collection Reservation of Washington; Tulalip [FR Doc. 2013–10218 Filed 4–30–13; 8:45 am] request addresses the regulations at 30 Tribes of Washington (previously listed BILLING CODE 4312–50–P CFR part 553, Oil Spill Financial as the Tulalip Tribes of the Tulalip Responsibility (OSFR) for Offshore Reservation, Washington); and the Facilities, including any supplementary DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Upper Skagit Indian Tribe (hereafter notices to lessees and operators that provide clarification, description, or referred to as ‘‘The Aboriginal Tribes’’). Bureau of Ocean Energy Management The Point Elliot Treaty provided an explanation of these regulations, and agreement between The Aboriginal [OMB Control Number 1010–0106] forms BOEM–1016 through BOEM– Tribes and the United States 1022. Government for land in western Information Collection: Oil Spill The BOEM uses the information Washington. The land from which the Financial Responsibility for Offshore collected under 30 CFR part 553 to Native American human remains and Facilities; Proposed Collection for verify compliance with section 1016 of associated funerary objects were OMB Review; Comment Request the Oil Pollution Act. The information removed was a part of the aboriginal MMAA104000 is necessary to confirm that applicants can pay for cleanup and damages from land ceded by the Point Elliot Treaty. ACTION: 60-day notice. • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the oil-spill discharges from Covered human remains described in this notice SUMMARY: To comply with the Offshore Facilities (COFs). represent the physical remains of one Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 We will protect information from individual of Native American ancestry. (PRA), the Bureau of Ocean Energy respondents considered proprietary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North: Lummi, Nooksack, Samish, Sauk-Suiattle, Stillaguamish
    Policy 7.01 Implementation Plan Region 2 North (R2N) Community Services Division (CSD) Serving the following Tribes: Lummi Nation, Nooksack Indian Tribe, Samish Indian Nation, Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe, Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians, Swinomish Tribal Community, Tulalip Tribes, & Upper Skagit Indian Tribe Biennium Timeframe: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Revised 04/2021 Annual Key Due Dates: April 1st - CSD Regional Administrators submit 7.01 Plan and Progress Reports (PPRs) to CSD HQ Coordinator. April 13th – CSD HQ Coordinator will submit Executive Summary & 7.01 PPRs to the ESA Office of Assistant Secretary for final review. April 23rd - ESA Office of the Assistant Secretary will send all 7.01 PPRs to Office of Indian Policy (OIP). 7.01 Meetings: January 17th- Cancelled due to inclement weather Next scheduled meeting April 17th, hosted by the Nooksack Indian Tribe. 07/07/20 Virtual 7.01 meeting. 10/16/20 7.01 Virtual meeting 01/15/21 7.01 Virtual 04/16/21 7.01 Virtual 07/16/21 7.01 Virtual Implementation Plan Progress Report Status Update for the Fiscal Year Goals/Objectives Activities Expected Outcome Lead Staff and Target Date Starting Last July 1 Revised 04/2021 Page 1 of 27 1. Work with tribes Lead Staff: to develop Denise Kelly 08/16/2019 North 7.01 Meeting hosted by services, local [email protected] , Tulalip Tribes agreements, and DSHS/CSD Tribal Liaison Memorandums of 10/18/2019 North 7.01 Meeting hosted by Understanding Dan Story, DSHS- Everett (MOUs) that best [email protected] meet the needs of Community Relations 01/17/2020 North 7.01 Meeting Region 2’s Administrator/CSD/ESA scheduled to be hosted by Upper Skagit American Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Testimony of Tom Wooten, Chairman, Samish Indian Nation
    Testimony of Tom Wooten, Chairman, Samish Indian Nation House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Indian, Insular and Alaska Native Affairs Legislative Hearing on H.R. 2320, the Samish Indian Nation Land Conveyance Act of 2017 November 15, 2017 Introduction Good morning Chairman LaMalfa, Ranking Member Torres, and Members of the Subcommittee. My name is Tom Wooten, Chairman of the Samish Indian Nation (“Tribe”), a federally recognized Indian tribe based in Anacortes, Washington, in the San Juan Islands. The Tribe is comprised of approximately 1,500 citizens. Thank you for this opportunity to testify today on H.R. 2320, the Samish Indian Nation Land Conveyance Act of 2017. H.R. 2320 would provide our Tribe with a small land base that will enable our tribal government to provide basic services to our citizens, address tribal government administrative needs, and give the Samish people more opportunities to participate in our traditional ways of life. On behalf of the Tribe, I extend our tremendous thanks to Congressman Rick Larsen for introducing H.R. 2320. This is the third time Rep. Larsen has introduced this bill. Our quest to obtain a land base for our people has been an extremely long and difficult road, and we greatly appreciate his commitment to assist the Samish Nation in rebuilding our community. I also want to thank Anacortes Mayor Laurie Gere and the City Council of Anacortes for their support and partnership, and for working with us over the past 14 years under a memorandum of agreement for mutual cooperation. I also would like to thank San Juan County Chair Rick Hughes and the County Board, Skagit County Chair Ron Wesen and County Commissioners, as well as our local state delegation for their support of H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe 2014 Hazard Mitigation Plan
    SHOALWATER BAY INDIAN TRIBE 2014 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN ` Bridgeview Consulting, LLC Bridging the Gap in Emergency Management Services 915 No. Laurel Lane Tacoma, WA 98406 Tel 253.301.1330 Fax 253.460.8220 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN FINAL SEPTEMBER 2014 Prepared for: Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe P.O. Box 130 Tokeland, WA 98590 Prepared by: ` Bridgeview Consulting, LLC Bridging the Gap in Emergency Management Services 915 No. Laurel Lane Tacoma, WA 98406 Tel 253.301.1330 Fax 253.460.8220 Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................................................. vii Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... E-1 Chapter 1. Introduction to the Planning Process ................................................................................................ 1-1 Chapter 2. Plan Development Methodology ...................................................................................................... 2-1 Chapter 3. Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe Profile ................................................................................................ 3-1 Chapter 4. Planning Area Natural Environment ................................................................................................ 4-1 Chapter 5. Demographics, Development and Regulation .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hylebos Watershed Plan
    Hylebos Watershed Plan July 2016 EarthCorps 6310 NE 74th Street, Suite 201E Seattle, WA 98115 Prepared by: Matt Schwartz, Project Manager Nelson Salisbury, Ecologist William Brosseau, Operations Director Pipo Bui, Director of Foundation and Corporate Relations Rob Anderson, Senior Project Manager Acknowledgements Support for the Hylebos Watershed Plan is provided by the Puget Sound Stewardship and Mitigation Fund, a grantmaking fund created by the Puget Soundkeeper Alliance and administered by the Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment. Hylebos Watershed Plan- EarthCorps 2016 | 1 June 28, 2016 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 History of EarthCorps/Friends of the Hylebos ........................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Key Stakeholders ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Purpose of Report- The Why ............................................................................................................................... 7 3 Goals and Process- The What and The How ................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Planning Process ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Section II Community Profile
    Section II: Community Profile Section II Community Profile Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010 Update 9 [this page intentionally left blank] 10 Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010 Update Section II: Community Profile Community Profile Disclaimer: The Tulalip Tribes Tribal/State Hazard Mitigation Plan covers all the people, property, infrastructure and natural environment within the exterior boundaries of the Tulalip Reservation as established by the Point Elliott Treaty of January 22, 1855 and by Executive Order of December 23, 1873, as well as any property owned by the Tulalip Tribes outside of this area. Furthermore the Plan covers the Tulalip Tribes Usual and Accustom Fishing areas (U&A) as determined by Judge Walter E. Craig in United States of America et. al., plaintiffs v. State of Washington et. al., defendant, Civil 9213 Phase I, Sub Proceeding 80-1, “In Re: Tulalip Tribes’ Request for Determination of Usual and Accustom Fishing Places.” This planning scope does not limit in any way the Tulalip Tribes’ hazard mitigation and emergency management planning concerns or influence. This section will provide detailed information on the history, geography, climate, land use, population and economy of the Tulalip Tribes and its Reservation. Tulalip Reservation History Archaeologists and historians estimate that Native Americans arrived from Siberia via the Bering Sea land bridge beginning 17,000 to 11,000 years ago in a series of migratory waves during the end of the last Ice Age. Indians in the region share a similar cultural heritage based on a life focused on the bays and rivers of Puget Sound. Throughout the Puget Sound region, While seafood was a mainstay of the native diet, cedar trees were the most important building material.there were Cedar numerous was used small to tribesbuild both that subsistedlonghouses on and salmon, large halibut,canoes.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Tribe Tribal Contact Information
    Washington State Tribe Tribal Contact Information Chinook Indian Nation The Honorable Tony Johnson, Chairman PO Box 368 Bay Center, WA 98527 Phone: 360-875-6670 Coeur d’Alene Tribe Jill Maria Wagner, Ph.D., THPO PO Box 408 850 A Street Plummer, ID 83851-0408 Phone: 208-686-1572 [email protected] Colville Confederated Tribes Guy Moura, THPO PO Box 150 Nespelem, WA 99155 Phone: 509-634-2695 [email protected] Jon Meyer, Cultural Resources [email protected] Confederated Tribes of the Dan Penn, Acting THPO Chehalis Reservation P.O. Box 536 Howanut Rd Oakville, WA 98568 Phone: 360.709.1747 [email protected] Confederated Tribes and Bands Kate Valdez, THPO of the Yakama Nation PO Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Phone: 509-985-7596 [email protected] Johnson Meninick, Cultural Resources Phone: 509-865-5121 x 4737 [email protected] David Powell, TFW Cultural Resources Phone: 509.865.5121 ext. 6312 [email protected] Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation 1110 Capitol Way South Suite 30, Olympia, WA 98501 Phone: 360.586.3065 Fax: 360.586.3067 www.dahp.wa.gov 2.2018 Washington State Tribe Tribal Contact Information Confederated Tribes of the Grande Ronde Jordan Mercier Cultural Protection Coordinator Tribal Historic Preservation Office 8720 Grand Ronde Road Grand Ronde, OR 97347 Phone: 503-879-2185 [email protected] [email protected] Confederated Tribes of the Teara Farrow Ferman, Manager Umatilla Indian Reservation Cultural Resources Protection Program 46411 Timíne Way Pendleton, OR 97801
    [Show full text]
  • 1 H.R. 2961 Response of Brian Cladoosby, Chairman of the Senate
    H.R. 2961 Response of Brian Cladoosby, Chairman of the Senate, Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, to Additional Questions Questions from Representative Paul Cook 1. At the hearing, you indicated that as the Chairman of the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community (SITC) you do not support H.R. 375. Could you explain why the SITC does not support H.R. 375? The premise of this question is factually inaccurate. I testified that the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community neither supports nor opposes H.R. 375 because SITC does not have a Carcieri problem. This exchange can be viewed at the 54 minute, 56 second mark of the hearing webcast as maintained on the Committee’s webpage. As retrieved on June 17, 2019, the URL for this exchange is https://youtu.be/I9COgMJj86U?t=3236. 2. Do you agree that Samish is a federally recognized Indian tribe? If not, please explain the basis for your response. I agree that the Samish Indian Nation is a federally recognized Indian tribe by virtue of the Final Determination to Acknowledge the Samish Tribal Organization as a Tribe made by Assistant Secretary – Indian Affairs Ada Deer on November 8, 1995.1 However, it is important to note that the Samish Indian Nation was not recognized as a successor to the historic Samish Tribe. To the contrary, its claim to be a successor to the historic Samish Tribe was specifically rejected in the recognition proceedings. See: - Greene v. Lujan, Order Granting Federal Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment at 10 (No. C89-645Z, W.D. Wash. Sept. 19, 1990) (Samish Indian Nation, then known as the Samish Indian Tribe of Washington, is precluded by United States v.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreline Master Program Second Draft Comments
    MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE Fisheries Division 39015 - 172nd Avenue SE . Auburn, Washington 98092-9763 Phone: (253) 939-3311 . Fax: (253) 931-0752 December 22,2011 Ms. Margaret Glowacki City of Seattle-DPD 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2000 P.O. Box 34019 Seattle, WA 98124-4019 RE: Seattle Shoreline Master Program Draft Regulations (2nd draft) Dear Ms. Glowacki: The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Habitat Program has reviewed Seattle's Shoreline Master Program Draft Regulations dated October 2011. Attached are our comments regarding these regulations in the interest of protecting and restoring the Tribe's treaty-protected fisheries resources. We request an opportunity to meet and discuss these comments further with you before the City's completes its next version of these regulations. This wil give us an opportunity to clarify any of the comments as needed, as well as work on language changes that may be needed to address the comments. Please call me at 253-876-3116 to set up this meeting. We appreciate the opportunity to review this proposal and look forward to meeting with you soon. Sincerely, l)rJ,) (,_ ~'""fÎ(\ Karen Walter Watersheds and Land Use Team Leader Cc: Joe Burcar, WDOE, NW Region Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division December 22, 2011 Comments to Seattle's SMP regulations 2nd draft Page 2 Comments to the Shoreline Master Program Regulations-Second Draft, October 2011 General comments 1. Aquaculture should be allowed in all shoreline designations. It is a priority use under the Shoreline Management Act and important for the Tribe's fisheries programs. Under the draft rules, aquaculture is only allowed as a conditional use in the UC; UG; UH; UI; UM designations.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Washington and Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Education Compact
    MUCKLESHOOT TRIBAL COUNCIL ~ 39015 172nd Avenue S.E. • Auburn, Washington 98092-9763 (253) 939-3311 • Fax (253) 931-8570 I RESOLUTION NO. \ 1 .., d' \ \ i ijj TO PROVIDE FOR THE EXTENSION OF THE STATE -TRIBAL a. COMPACT RELATING TO THE MUCKLESHOOT TRIBAL SCHOOL AND TO PROVIDE FOR A FIVE YEAR TERM WHEREAS, the Muckleshoot Indian Tribal Council is the duly constituted governing body for the Muckleshoot Indian Reservation by the authority of, and is herein acting solely pursuant to, its constitution and by-laws approved May 13, 193 6, by the Secretary ofthe Interior, and as amended June 28, 1977, and not pursuant to its Indian Reorganization Act Corporate Charter ratified October, 31, 1936; and WHEREAS, in 2014 the Muckleshoot Tribe and the Washington State Superintendent of Public Education entered into a joint Tribal-State Compact intended to provide state funding to the Tribal School under the authority of RCW 28A. 715; and WHEREAS, the term of the 2014 Compact was three years ending September 3, 2017; and, WHEREAS, the Muckleshoot Tribe and Superintendent wish to renew the current Compact for an additional five year term ending September 3, 2022; and, WHEREAS, in agreeing to renew and continue the current compact for an additional five year term the parties have agreed upon certain modifications which are incorporated into the attached State-Tribal Compact where said State-Tribal Compact is attached to this Resolution and made a part hereof as if setout fully herein; and, WHEREAS, the Tribal Council has determined it is in the best interest of the Tribe that the attached State-Tribal Compact be approved.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Recent Dear Colleague Letter 99-30, OCSE Notified You of A
    Location Codes Workgroup FIPS Coding Scheme Recommendation Summary Position 1 Position 2 Positions 3-5 Interstate Case FIPS State Identifier County/Functional Entity 9 0 BIA Tribe Identifier Tribal Case (Federally recognized) 8 0 ISO Country Identifier International Case Exception 0-9, A-Z (Canada – sub- jurisdiction) Tribal and International Case Location Codes 1 OCSE Case Locator Code Data Standards Tribal locator codes coding scheme Tribal Case Locator Codes • Classification code - 9 in position 1 • “0”(zero) in position 2 • Tribe Identification - BIA code in positions 3-5 Example: Chickasaw Nation 90906 • Addresses for tribal grantees– provided by tribes to IRG staff List of current tribal grantees: http://ocse.acf.hhs.gov/int/directories/index.cfm?fuseaction=main.tribalivd • Link to tribal government addresses web site: http://www.doi.gov/leaders.pdf 11/15/2006 2 OCSE Case Locator Code Data Standards Tribal Identification Codes Code Name 001 Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians of North Carolina 006 Onondaga Nation of New York 007 St. Regis Band of Mohawk Indians of New York 008 Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians of New York 009 Tuscarora Nation of New York 011 Oneida Nation of New York 012 Seneca Nation of New York 013 Cayuga Nation of New York 014 Passamaquoddy Tribe of Maine 018 Penobscot Tribe of Maine 019 Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians of Maine 020 Mashantucket Pequot Tribe of Connecticut 021 Seminole Tribe of Florida, Dania, Big Cypress, Brighton, Hollywood & Tampa Reservations 026 Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida 027 Narragansett
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Ceded Areas in Washington State
    Blaine Lynden Sumas Fern- Nooksack Oroville Metaline dale Northport Everson Falls Lummi Nation Metaline Ione Tribal Ceded Areas Bellingham Nooksack Tribe Tonasket by Treaty or Executive Order Marcus Samish Upper Kettle Republic Falls Indian Skagit Sedro- Friday Woolley Hamilton Conconully Harbor Nation Tribe Lyman Concrete Makah Colville Anacortes Riverside Burlington Tribe Winthrop Kalispel Mount Vernon Cusick Tribe La Omak Swinomish Conner Twisp Tribe Okanogan Colville Chewelah Oak Stan- Harbor wood Confederated Lower Elwha Coupeville Darrington Sauk-Suiattle Newport Arlington Tribes Klallam Port Angeles The Tulalip Tribe Stillaguamish Nespelem Tribe Tribes Port Tribe Brewster Townsend Granite Marysville Falls Springdale Quileute Sequim Jamestown Langley Forks Pateros Tribe S'Klallam Lake Stevens Spokane Bridgeport Elmer City Deer Everett Tribe Tribe Park Mukilteo Snohomish Grand Hoh Monroe Sultan Coulee Port Mill Chelan Creek Tribe Edmonds Gold Bothell + This map does not depict + Gamble Bar tribally asserted Index Mansfield Wilbur Creston S'Klallam Tribe Woodinville traditional hunting areas. Poulsbo Suquamish Millwood Duvall Skykomish Kirk- Hartline Almira Reardan Airway Tribe land Redmond Carnation Entiat Heights Spokane Medical Bainbridge Davenport Tribal Related Boundaries Lake Island Seattle Sammamish Waterville Leavenworth Coulee City Snoqualmie Duwamish Waterway Bellevue Bremerton Port Orchard Issaquah North Cheney Harrington Quinault Renton Bend Cashmere Rockford Burien Wilson Nation
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 74, No. 99/Tuesday, May 26
    24876 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 26, 2009 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR indicated they would not claim the should contact Dr. Jay Reifel, Assistant human remains because they consider Superintendent, Paul H. Karshner National Park Service Decatur Island to be outside of their Memorial Museum, telephone (253) usual and accustomed places. Both the 840–8971, or Ms. Beth Bestrom, Notice of Inventory Completion: Paul Samish Indian Nation and Swinomish Museum Curator, Paul H. Karshner H. Karshner Memorial Museum, Indian Tribal Community have Memorial Museum, telephone (253) Puyallup, WA submitted claims to the Paul H. 841–8748, 309 4th St. NE, Puyallup, WA AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. Karshner Memorial Museum for human 98372, before June 25, 2009. remains from Decatur Island, and each Repatriation of the human remains to ACTION: Notice. tribe provided evidence regarding the Samish Indian Nation, Washington Notice is here given in accordance aboriginal use of Decatur Island. During may proceed after that date if no with the Native American Graves the consultation process, representatives additional claimants come forward. Protection and Repatriation Act of the Swinomish Indian Tribal The Paul H. Karshner Memorial (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the Community stated that they consider Museum is responsible for notifying the completion of an inventory of human Decatur Island to have been used Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation, remains in the possession of Paul H. primarily by the aboriginal Samish, to Washington; Samish Indian Nation, Karshner Memorial Museum, Puyallup, which the Swinomish Indian Tribal Washington; Swinomish Indian Tribal WA. The human remains were removed Community is an adjudicated legal Community of the Swinomish from Decatur Island, San Juan County, successor in interest (United States v.
    [Show full text]