ANNUAL REPORT 2019/2020 Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ANNUAL REPORT 2019/2020 Table of Contents OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF POLITICAL PARTIES ANNUAL REPORT 2019/2020 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations and Acronyms......................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. iv Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. v CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Mandate of the Office .............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Vision ....................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Mission .................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Core Values ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.6 Organizational Structure of ORPP ........................................................................................... 2 1.7 ORPP Stakeholders ................................................................................................................. 4 1.8 The ORPP Management Team 2019/2020 ............................................................................. 5 CHAPTER TWO: ACHIEVEMENTS ....................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Legal Reforms ......................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.1 Engagement in Parliament ...................................................................................................... 6 2.1.2 Policy and Legislation of Party Primaries ................................................................................. 6 2.2 Registration of Political Parties ................................................................................................ 8 2.2.1 Name Search for a Proposed Political Party ............................................................................ 9 2.2.2 Provisional Registration ........................................................................................................... 9 2.2.3 Full Registration ..................................................................................................................... 10 2.2.4 Coalitions ............................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 Regulation of Political Parties ................................................................................................ 12 2.3.1 Compliance with the Political Parties Act, 2011 ..................................................................... 12 2.3.2 Capacity Building of Political Parties ...................................................................................... 13 2.3.3 Changes by Political Parties .................................................................................................. 14 2.3.4 Litigation ................................................................................................................................ 15 2.3.5 Administration of the Political Parties Fund ........................................................................... 16 2.4 Integrated Political Parties Management System (IPPMS) .................................................... 17 2.5 Capacity Building of ORPP .................................................................................................... 19 2.5.1 Human Resource Capacity .................................................................................................... 19 2.5.2 Mitigation against COVID 19 ................................................................................................. 21 [i] 2.5.3 Institutional capacity .............................................................................................................. 22 2.6 The ORPP Corporate Image ................................................................................................. 22 2.7 Strategic partnerships and collaborations .................................................................................... 24 2.7.1 Tripartite Dialogue Platform ............................................................................................... 24 2.7.2 Partners and areas of partnership ..................................................................................... 27 CHAPTER THREE: MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF ORPP FINANCES ....................... 29 3.1 Recurrent budget performance .............................................................................................. 29 3.2 Submission of expenditure reports and statement of accounts.............................................. 30 3.3 Audit of Political Parties’ Accounts by ORPP ......................................................................... 30 3.4 Appropriation in Aid (A-I-A) .................................................................................................... 30 3.5 Preparation of (MTEF) for FY 2020/2021 – 2022/2023 .......................................................... 30 CHAPTER FOUR: ACTIVITIES TO BE CARRIED OUT IN 2021/2022 ................................................ 31 CHAPTER FIVE: CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................... 32 5.1 Challenges ............................................................................................................................. 32 5.2 Recommendations ................................................................................................................. 32 Annex I: ORPP Organizational Structure ............................................................................................... 33 Annex II: List of political parties’ name search applications and reasons for rejection ........................... 34 Annex III: List of fully registered political parties as at 30th June, 2020. ................................................. 46 [ii] List of Abbreviations and Acronyms BBI Building Bridges Initiative CMD Centre for Multiparty Democracy FY Financial Year GOK Government of Kenya HR Human Resource ICT Information and Communication Technology IEBC Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission IPPMS Integrated Political Parties Management System MoH Ministry of Health NDI National Democratic Institute ORPP Office of the registrar of Political Parties PP Political parties PFMA Public Financial Management Act PPA Political Parties Act PPDT Political Parties Dispute Tribunal PPF Political Parties Fund PPLC Political Parties Liaison Committee PSC Public Service Commission RPP Registrar of Political Parties TOR Terms of Reference [iii] Executive Summary The Office of the Registrar of Political Parties is a state office established under the Political Parties Act, 2011 with the mandate to register and regulate political parties as well as administer the Political Parties Fund. This report summarizes the achievements of the office, highlights challenges and makes recommendations on how to address the challenges and the way forward in the implementation of the Political Parties Act, 2011. The Act is the primary legal reference for management of political parties pursuant to Articles 91 and 92 of the Constitution, which envisage that political parties respect internal democracy and their constitutional status in the Kenyan political system. Political parties provide an avenue important discourse as well as being vehicles for seeking elective leadership and therefore fulfilling the aspirations of the electorates. As a result, they are critical institutions of social, economic and political governance. Strong and vibrant political parties guarantee democratic competition. Chapter one highlights the mandate of the ORPP, the strategic direction including vision, mission, core values. The chapter also presents the hierarchical arrangement with regard to lines of authority, communication and duties as outlined in the ORPP organizational structure. Chapter two summaries the achievements of the Office under the following thematic areas; Legal reforms; Registration of Political Parties; Regulation of Political Parties; Integrated Political Parties Management System; Institutional Capacity Building; ORPP Corporate Image; and Strategic Partnerships and Collaborations. Chapter three presents management and administration of ORPP finances for the financial year 2019/2020 while chapter four and five highlights the planned activities for FY 2021/22, challenges faced by ORPP and the recommendations respectively. [iv] Foreword The Office of the Registrar of Political Parties is pleased to present its annual performance report for the financial year 2019/2020 to all our stakeholders and the public in general. The Political Parties Act, 2011 established the Office of the Registrar of Political Parties as a State Office within the meaning of Article 260 of the Constitution of Kenya.
Recommended publications
  • Notes and References
    Notes and References 1 The Foundation of Kenya Colony I. P[ublic] R[ecord] O[ffice] Kew CO 533/234 ff 432-44. Kenya was how Johann Krapf, the German missionary who was in 1849 the first white man to see the mountain, transliterated the Kamba pronunciation of the Kikuyu name for it, Kirinyaga. The Kamba substituted glottal stops for intermediate consonants, hence 'Ki-i-ny-a'. T. C. Colchester, 'Origins of Kenya as the Name of the Country', Rhodes House. Mss Afr s.1849. 2. PRO CO 822/3117 Malcolm MacDonald to Duncan Sandys. Secret and Personal. 18 September 1963. 3. The new rail routes in question were the Uasin Gishu line and the Thika extension. M. F. Hill, Permanent Way. The StOlY of the Kenya and Uganda Railway (Nairobi: East African Railways and Harbours, 2nd edn 1961), p. 392. 4. Daily Sketch, 5 July 1920, p. 5. 5. Sekallyolya ('the crane [or stork] looking out on the world') was first printed in Nairobi in the Luganda language in 1921. From time to time it brought out editions in Swahili and for special occasions in English. Harry Thuku's Tangazo was the first Kenya African single­ sheet newsletter. 6. Interview with James Beauttah, Fort Hall, 1964. Beauttah was one of the first English-speaking African telephone operators. He claimed to be the first African to have electricity in his house. 7. PRO FO 2/377 A. Gray to FO, 16 February 1900, 'Memo on Report of Law Officers of the Crown reo East Africa and Uganda Protector­ ates'. The effect of the opinion of the law officers is that Her Majesty has, by virtue of her Protectorate, entire control over all lands unappropriated ..
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Constitutional Law SPRING 2012
    Comparative Constitutional Law SPRING 2012 PROFESSOR STEPHEN J. SCHNABLY Office: G472 http://osaka.law.miami.edu/~schnably/courses.html Tel.: 305-284-4817 E-mail: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY READINGS: TABLE OF CONTENTS Reference re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217 .................................................................1 Supreme Court Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. S-26. An Act respecting the Supreme Court of Canada................................................................................................................................11 INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983) .............................................................................................12 Kenya Timeline..............................................................................................................................20 Laurence Juma, Ethnic Politics and the Constitutional Review Process in Kenya, 9 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int’l L. 471 (2002) ..........................................................................................23 Mary L. Dudziak, Working Toward Democracy: Thurgood Marshall and the Constitution of Kenya, 56 Duke L.J. 721 (2006)....................................................................................26 Laurence Juma, Ethnic Politics and the Constitutional Review Process in Kenya, 9 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int’l L. 471 (2002) .......................................................................................34 Migai Akech, Abuse of Power and Corruption in Kenya: Will the New Constitution Enhance Government
    [Show full text]
  • KENYA ASSESSMENT April 2000
    KENYA ASSESSMENT April 2000 Country Information and Policy Unit I. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 This assessment has been produced by the Country Information & Policy Unit, Immigration & Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a variety of sources. 1.2 The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive, nor is it intended to catalogue all human rights violations. It concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum claims made in the United Kingdom. 1.3 The assessment is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them. The vast majority of the source material is readily available in the public domain. 1.4 It is intended to revise the assessment on a 6-monthly basis while the country remains within the top 35 asylum producing countries in the United Kingdom. 1.5 The assessment will be placed on the Internet, http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/ind/cipu1.htm. An electronic copy of the assessment has been made available to the following organisations: Amnesty International UK Immigration Advisory Service Immigration Appellate Authority Immigration Law Practitioners' Association Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants JUSTICE Medical Foundation for the care of Victims of Torture Refugee Council Refugee Legal Centre UN High Commissioner for Refugees 1 CONTENTS I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.01 - 1.05 II GEOGRAPHY 2.01 - 2.02 The
    [Show full text]
  • Variable Name
    Data codebook for a Round 5 Afrobarometer survey in 34 African countries Prepared by: Chunho Park Michigan State University July 2015 University of Cape Town (UCT) Center for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana) Michigan State University (MSU) Centre for Social Science Research 14 W. Airport Residential Area Department of Political Science Private Bag, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa P.O. Box 404, Legon-Accra, Ghana East Lansing, Michigan 48824 27 21 650 3827•fax: 27 21 650 4657 233 21 776 142•fax: 233 21 763 028 517 353 3377•fax: 517 432 1091 Mattes ([email protected]) Gyimah-Boadi ([email protected]) Bratton ([email protected]) Copyright Afrobarometer Table of Contents Page number Variable descriptives 3-71 Appendix 1: Sample characteristics 72 Appendix 2: List of country abbreviations and country-specific codes 73 Appendix 3: Technical Information Forms for each country survey 74-107 Copyright Afrobarometer 2 Question Number: COUNTRY_ALPHA Question: Country Variable Label: Country in alphabetical order Values: 1-35 Value Labels: 1=Algeria, 2=Benin, 3=Botswana, 4=Burkina Faso, 5=Burundi, 6=Cameroon, 7=Cape Verde, 8=Cote d’Ivoire, 9=Egypt, 11=Ghana, 12=Guinea, 13=Kenya, 14=Lesotho, 15=Liberia, 16=Madagascar, 17=Malawi, 18=Mali, 19=Mauritius, 20=Morocco, 21=Mozambique, 22=Namibia, 23=Niger, 24=Nigeria, 25=Senegal, 26=Sierra Leone, 27=South Africa, 28=Sudan, 29=Swaziland, 30=Tanzania, 31=Togo, 32=Tunisia, 33=Uganda, 34=Zambia, 35=Zimbabwe Note: Answered by interviewer Question Number: RESPNO Question: Respondent number Variable Label: Respondent
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya Constitutional Documents: a Comparative Analysis
    CMIREPORT Kenya Constitutional Documents: A Comparative Analysis Preston Chitere Ludeki Chweya Japhet Masya Arne Tostensen Kamotho Waiganjo R 2006: 5 Kenya Constitutional Documents: A Comparative Analysis Preston Chitere, Ludeki Chweya, Japhet Masya Arne Tostensen, Kamotho Waiganjo R 2006: 5 CMI Reports This series can be ordered from: Chr. Michelsen Institute P.O. Box 6033 Postterminalen, N-5892 Bergen, Norway Tel: + 47 55 57 40 00 Fax: + 47 55 57 41 66 E-mail: [email protected] www.cmi.no Price: NOK 50 ISSN 0805-505X ISBN 82-8062-153-9 This report is also available at: www.cmi.no/publications This report has also been released as IPAR Working Paper No. 7/2006 Indexing terms Constitutions Comparative analysis Kenya Project number 25170 Project title Comparative study of Kenyan constitutions Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS.......................................................................................................VI PART I: INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................... 1 1. PREAMBLE............................................................................................................................................. 1 2. THE PROCESS AND PRELUDE TO THE REFERENDUM............................................................. 2 PART II: THE COMPARISONS ............................................................................................................... 5 3. THE EXECUTIVE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO PARLIAMENT ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Civil Society Organization Sustainability Index
    STRENGTHENING STRENGTHENING CIVIL SOCIETY CIVIL SOCIETY GLOBALLY GLOBALLY 2017 CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION SUSTAINABILITY INDEX FOR SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA 9th EDITION - DECEMBER 2018 2017 CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION SUSTAINABILITY INDEX FOR SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA 9th EDITION - DECEMBER 2018 Developed By: United States Agency for International Development Bureau for Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance Center of Excellence on Democracy, Human Rights and Governance In Partnership With: FHI 360 International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ICNL) Acknowledgment: This publication was made possible through support provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under Cooperative Agreement No. AID-OAA-LA-17-00003. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are those of the panelists and other project researchers and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or FHI 360. Cover Photo: Fanis Lisiagali, Executive Director of Healthcare Assistance Kenya, leads the White Ribbon Campaign in a march in Nairobi to promote its rapid response call center hotline, which responds to violence against women in elections (October 2017). Photo Credit: Carla Chianese, Kenya Electoral Assistance Program, International Foundation for Electoral Systems TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download It From
    IMD Partner in Democracy A NNUAL R EPORT 2005 The IMD – an institute of political parties for political parties The Institute for Multiparty Democracy (IMD) is an institute of political parties for political parties. Its mandate is to encourage the process of democratisation in young democracies by providing support to political parties as the core pillars of multi- party democracy. IMD works in a strictly non-partisan and inclusive manner. Through this approach, the Institute endeavours to contribute to properly functioning, sustainable pluralistic political party systems. It also supports the activities of civil society groups which play a healthy role in multi-party democracies, even though they are not part of any formal party structure. IMD was set up by seven Dutch political parties in 2000 in response to requests for support from around the world. The IMD’s founding members are the Dutch Labour Party (PvdA), Liberal Party (VVD), Christian Democratic Party (CDA), Democratic Party (D66), Green Party (GroenLinks), Christian Union (ChristenUnie) and Reformed Party (SGP). Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy Korte Vijverberg 2 2513 AB The Hague The Netherlands Address per September 1, 2006: Passage 31 2511 AB The Hague The Netherlands T: +31 (0)70 311 5464 F: +31 (0)70 311 5465 E: [email protected] www.nimd.org IMD Partner in Democracy A NNUAL R EPORT 2005 Partners in Democracy Preface Without properly functioning political parties, resulted in a study for the European Parliament entitled democracies do not work well – a fact that is not yet No lasting Peace and Prosperity without Democracy & fully recognised within the international development Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya: Decolonization, Democracy and the Struggle for Uhuru ______
    Meyer 1 Mount Holyoke College Kenya: Decolonization, Democracy and the Struggle for Uhuru _______________________________________________________________________ Kathryn R. Meyer Senior Thesis in International Relations April 27, 2015 Meyer 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………….…………. i Abstract………………………………………………..……………………………...……………. ii Chapter I: Introduction …...………………….……………………………..…………. 1 Research Questions………………………………………………………………. 5 Thesis Organization…………………………………………………..………….. 6 Chapter II: Literature Review………………………………………………………... 10 Terminology …………………………………………..………………………………… 14 Framework of Empire ………………………………….…..………………………….. 16 Primary Source Material ……………………………………..………………………. 17 Methodology …………………………………………………………….……………... 18 Chapter III: British Policies Prior to Independence………………………………... 19 British Land Acts …………………………………………..………………………….. 21 Anti-Colonialism and Nationalism …………………………………..……………… 25 Chapter IV: Decolonization …………………………….……………………………. 31 Chapter V: Independence, 1960-1964………….…………………………………….. 36 Chapter VI: The Kenyatta Era ………………………………………………………. 58 Chapter VII: Arap Moi and 25 Years Post-Independence ………………………… 71 Chapter VIII: Conclusion ……………………………………………………………. 78 Appendix ………………………..………..…………………………………………….. Bibliography ……………………………..…………………………………………….. Meyer i Acknowledgements This project would never have been possible without my initial project advisor, Professor Kavita Datla. From the first ill-prepared proposal in my junior year spring to the creation of my first few chapters
    [Show full text]
  • Thurgood Marshall and the Constitution of Kenya (56 DUKE LAW JOURNAL (Forthcoming Dec
    Working Toward Democracy: Thurgood Marshall and the Constitution of Kenya (56 DUKE LAW JOURNAL (forthcoming Dec. 2006)) Mary L. Dudziak USC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-5 LEGAL STUDIES RESEARCH PAPER SERIES University of Southern California Law School Los Angeles, CA 90089-0071 This paper can be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Network electronic library at http://ssrn.com/abstract=895313 Working Toward Democracy: Thurgood Marshall and the Constitution of Kenya Mary L. Dudziak Judge Edward J. and Ruey L. Guirado Professor of Law, History and Political Science University of Southern California Law School William Nelson Cromwell Visiting Professor of Law Harvard Law School Abstract This Article is a work of transnational legal history. Drawing upon new research in foreign archives, it sheds new light on the life of Thurgood Marshall, exploring for the first time an episode that he cared very deeply about: his work with African nationalists on an independence constitution for Kenya. The story is paradoxical, for Marshall, a civil rights legend in America, would seek to protect the rights of white landholders in Kenya who had gained their land through discriminatory land laws, but were soon to lose political power. In order to understand why Marshall would take pride in entrenching property rights gained through past injustice, the Article tells the story of the role of constitutional politics in Kenya’s independence. While Sub-Saharan Africa is often dismissed as a region with “constitutions without constitutionalism,” the Article argues that constitutionalism played an important role in Kenya’s independence. Against a backdrop of violence, adversaries in Kenya fought with each other not with guns but with constitutional clauses.
    [Show full text]
  • Guyana General and Regional Elections
    Guyana General and Regional Elections 2 March 2020 CONTENTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ..................................................................... 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 1 .................................................................................... 11 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 11 Terms of Reference .................................................................... 11 Activities ................................................................................. 12 CHAPTER 2 .................................................................................... 13 POLITICAL BACKGROUND ................................................................. 13 Context for the 2020 Elections ....................................................... 16 CHAPTER 3 .................................................................................... 20 THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ELECTION ADMINISTRATION .......................... 20 Election Administration ............................................................... 24 Voter Eligibility and the Electoral Register ......................................... 24 Recommendations ...................................................................... 26 CHAPTER 4 .................................................................................... 28 PARTICIPATION AND INCLUSION ......................................................... 28 Gender ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Single-Party Rule in a Multiparty Age: Tanzania in Comparative Perspective
    SINGLE-PARTY RULE IN A MULTIPARTY AGE: TANZANIA IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement of the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Richard L. Whitehead August, 2009 © by Richard L. Whitehead 2009 All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT Title: Single-Party Rule in a Multiparty Age: Tanzania in Comparative Perspective Candidate's Name: Richard L. Whitehead Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Temple University, 2009 Doctoral Advisory Committee Chair: Richard Deeg As international pressure for multiparty reforms swept Africa during the early 1990s, long- time incumbent, such as UNIP in Zambia, KANU in Kenya, and the MCP in Malawi, were simultaneously challenged by widespread domestic demands for multiparty reforms. Only ten years later, after succumbing to reform demands, many long-time incumbents were out of office after holding competitive multiparty elections. My research seeks an explanation for why this pattern did not emerge in Tanzanian, where the domestic push for multiparty change was weak, and, despite the occurrence of three multiparty elections, the CCM continues to win with sizable election margins. As identified in research on semi-authoritarian rule, the post-reform pattern for incumbency maintenance in countries like Togo, Gabon, and Cameroon included strong doses of repression, manipulation and patronage as tactics for surviving in office under to multiparty elections. Comparatively speaking however, governance by the CCM did not fit the typical post-Cold-War semi-authoritarian pattern of governance either. In Tanzania, coercion and manipulation appears less rampant, while patronage, as a constant across nearly every African regime, cannot explain the overwhelming mass support the CCM continues to enjoy today.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Law 2019 Lihiru Victoria.Pdf
    Participatory Constitutional Reforms vs. Realization of Equal Representation of Men and Women in the Parliaments: A Study of Kenya, Rwanda and Tanzania By Victoria Melkisedeck Lihiru- LHRVIC001/1555440 Thesis Submitted for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHYTown in the Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law of the UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN. August 2019Cape of University Supervisor: Associate Professor Waheeda Amien The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgementTown of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Cape Published by the University ofof Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University COPYRIGHT The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or noncommercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. i DECLARATION I, Victoria Melkisedeck Lihiru, hereby declare that the work on which this thesis is based is my original work (except where acknowledgments indicate otherwise) and that neither the whole work nor any part of it has been, is being, or is to be submitted for another degree in this or any other university. I authorise the university to reproduce for the purpose of research either the whole or any portion of the contents in any manner whatsoever.
    [Show full text]