DOCSLIB.ORG

Tulsa Bike Share Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tulsa Bike Share Report TULSA BIKE SHARE STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN A project of the Indian Nations Council of Governments in partnership with the City of Tulsa ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Tulsa Bike Share Strategic Plan was commissioned by the Indian Nations Council of Governments in partnership with the City of Tulsa, and prepared by Alta Planning + Design. The project partners would like to thank the Advisory Committee members who guided the process, as well as the key stakeholders who participated in interviews and offered valuableii | CHAPTER insights #: that CHAPTER contributed TITLE towards the development of this Plan April 2015 1. Overview ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Evolution of bike share technology ..................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Benefits of Bike Share ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Financial Benefits .................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Health Benefits......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Transportation/Mobility Benefits ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Safety Benefits ........................................................................................................................................................................ 10 3. Bike Share System Case Studies .................................................................................................................................... 12 Kansas City, MO – KC B-Cycle ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Chattanooga, TN – Chattanooga Bicycle Transit System ........................................................................................... 14 Oklahoma City, OK – Spokies bike share program....................................................................................................... 15 Greater Phoenix, AZ GriD .................................................................................................................................................. 16 4. Program Goals and Interest in Bike Share ................................................................................................................... 17 5. Local Context Analysis ................................................................................................................................................... 19 a. Opportunities and Challenges ................................................................................................................................. 19 b. Physical Characteristics............................................................................................................................................. 21 c. Bike Share User Profiles and Demographics ......................................................................................................... 21 i. Early Adopters ......................................................................................................................................................... 22 ii. Employment ............................................................................................................................................................. 22 iii. Visitors ...................................................................................................................................................................... 22 d. Policy Environment..................................................................................................................................................... 23 i. Transit ....................................................................................................................................................................... 23 ii. Bike Network .......................................................................................................................................................... 23 6. System Planning 6.1 Basis for Service Area Recommendation ............................................................................................................ 25 6.2 Station Spacing and Footprint ............................................................................................................................. 29 6.3 Recommended System and Phasing Plan .......................................................................................................... 30 7. Business Model ................................................................................................................................................................. 34 8. System Costs ..................................................................................................................................................................... 40 8.1 Launch Costs ........................................................................................................................................................... 40 8.2 Capital Costs ........................................................................................................................................................... 40 8.3 Administrative Costs .............................................................................................................................................. 41 8.4 Operating Costs ....................................................................................................................................................... 41 8.5 Cost Summary .......................................................................................................................................................... 43 9 System Revenues ............................................................................................................................................................. 44 9.1 User Revenues ......................................................................................................................................................... 44 9.1.1 Rate Schedule .................................................................................................................................................... 44 9.1.2 Special Memberships ........................................................................................................................................ 47 9.1.3 Membership and Ridership Forecast ............................................................................................................ 47 9.2 Grants and Public Funding ................................................................................................................................... 51 9.3 Private Foundations ................................................................................................................................................ 52 9.4 Advertising and Sponsorship Revenues ............................................................................................................. 52 9.5 Revenue Summary ................................................................................................................................................... 55 10 Preliminary Financial Plan ............................................................................................................................................. 56 10.1 Cash Flow Analysis ................................................................................................................................................. 56 11 Operational Issues ............................................................................................................................................................ 57 11.1 Service Levels ............................................................................................................................................................ 57 11.2 Maintenance Plan .................................................................................................................................................... 57 11.3 Reporting .................................................................................................................................................................. 57 11.4 Insurance ................................................................................................................................................................... 57 12 System Equity Considerations ...................................................................................................................................... 58 12.1 System Planning ...................................................................................................................................................... 58 12.2 Membership Affordability ....................................................................................................................................60 12.3 Promoting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CONNECTING the RARITAN HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rutgers University Bloustein School of Policy and Planning | Fall 2016 Graduate Studio
    RUTGERS UNIVERSITY BIKE SHARE CONNECTING THE RARITAN HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rutgers University Bloustein School of Policy and Planning | Fall 2016 Graduate Studio ABOUT THE STUDIO This studio project is an analysis of the health impacts of the We met with Bloustein professors, with planning professionals, potential new Bike Share program planned for the Rutgers-New and with the organizers and staff of bike shares across the coun- Brunswick community. It builds upon our client’s – the Rutgers try in order to ask questions and gain invaluable advice on how University Department of Institutional Planning and Opera- to proceed with our analysis. We used this collected knowledge tion (IPO) – Internal Bicycle Share Proposal. The IPO report to build impact projections and develop a list of actionable rec- highlighted existing bicycle infrastructure, robust public trans- ommendations targeted at maximizing positive health outcomes portation infrastructure, and the high concentration of bicycle while mitigating health concerns. commuters in the study area as support for their proposal. This studio expanded on that analysis by examining the physical, This studio course is intended to advance the goals of Healthier mental, social, and economic health of the users and residents New Brunswick, a network of partners in the City of New Bruns- of Rutgers campus and the surrounding areas. Our targeted wick that are working together to ensure that all residents have audience for this analysis was people who currently do not bike; equal access to the services and conditions that allow for good we paid close attention to equity issues and vulnerable popula- health and well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • By the Numbers
    By the Numbers Quantifying Some of Our Environmental & Social Work 6.2 MILLION 100 Dollars we donated this fiscal year Percentage of Patagonia products we take to fund environmental work back for recycling 70 MILLION 164,062 Cash and in-kind services we’ve donated since Pounds of Patagonia products recycled our tithing program began in 1985 or upcycled since 2004 741 84 Environmental groups that received Percentage of water saved through our new a Patagonia grant this year denim dyeing technology as compared to environmental + social initiatives conventional synthetic indigo denim dyeing 116,905 Dollars given to nonprofits this year through 100 our Employee Charity Match program Percentage of Traceable Down (traceable to birds that were never live-plucked, 20 MILLION & CHANGE never force-fed) we use in our down products 2 Dollars we’ve allocated to invest in environmentally and socially responsible companies through our 1996 venture capital fund Year we switched to the exclusive use of organically grown cotton 0 8 New investments we made this year through 10,424 $20 Million & Change Hours our employees volunteered this year 1 on the company dime 5 Mega-dams that will not be built on Chile’s Baker 30,000 and Pascua rivers thanks to a worldwide effort Approximate number of Patagonia products 5 in which we participated repaired this year at our Reno Service Center 380 15 MILLION Public screenings this year for DamNation Acres of degraded grassland we hope to restore in the Patagonia region of South America by buying and supporting the purchase of responsibly sourced 75,000 merino wool Signatures collected this year petitioning the Obama administration to remove four dams initiatives social + environmental on the lower Snake River 774,671 Single-driver car-trip miles avoided this year 192 through our Drive-Less program Fair Trade Certified™ styles in the Patagonia line as of fall 2015 100 MILLION Dollars 1% for the Planet® has donated to nonprofit environmental groups cover: Donnie Hedden © 2015 Patagonia, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard's 21St Century Bicycl E 'The Best Guide to Bikes and Cycling Ever Book Published' Bike Events
    Richard's 21st Century Bicycl e 'The best guide to bikes and cycling ever Book published' Bike Events RICHARD BALLANTINE This book is dedicated to Samuel Joseph Melville, hero. First published 1975 by Pan Books This revised and updated edition first published 2000 by Pan Books an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 25 Eccleston Place, London SW1W 9NF Basingstoke and Oxford Associated companies throughout the world www.macmillan.com ISBN 0 330 37717 5 Copyright © Richard Ballantine 1975, 1989, 2000 The right of Richard Ballantine to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. • All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the publisher. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. • Printed and bound in Great Britain by The Bath Press Ltd, Bath This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall nor, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher's prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser.
    [Show full text]
  • This May Be the Author's Version of a Work That Was Submitted/Accepted
    This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Heesch, Kristiann & Sahlqvist, Shannon (2013) Key influences on motivations for utility cycling (cycling for transport to and from places). Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 24(3), pp. 227-233. This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/64599/ c Copyright 2013 CSIRO This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu- ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog- nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record (i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub- mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) can be identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear- ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source. https://doi.org/10.1071/HE13062 RUNNING HEAD: Motivations for Utility Cycling Key influences on motivations for utility cycling (cycling for transport to and from places) 1 Abstract Issue addressed: Although increases in cycling in Brisbane are encouraging, bicycle mode share to work in the state of Queensland remains low.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycling Futures the High-Quality Paperback Edition of This Book Is Available for Purchase Online
    Cycling Futures The high-quality paperback edition of this book is available for purchase online: https://shop.adelaide.edu.au/ Published in Adelaide by University of Adelaide Press The University of Adelaide South Australia 5005 [email protected] www.adelaide.edu.au/press The University of Adelaide Press publishes externally refereed scholarly books by staff of the University of Adelaide. It aims to maximise access to the University’s best research by publishing works through the internet as free downloads and for sale as high quality printed volumes. © 2015 The authors This work is licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. This licence allows for the copying, distribution, display and performance of this work for non-commercial purposes providing the work is clearly attributed to the copyright holders. Address all inquiries to the Director at the above address. For the full Cataloguing-in-Publication data please contact the National Library of Australia: [email protected] ISBN (paperback) 978-1-925261-16-5 ISBN (pdf) 978-1-925261-17-2 ISBN (epub) 978-1-925261-18-9 ISBN (kindle) 978-1-925261-19-6 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20851/cycling-futures Editor: Rebecca Burton Editorial Support: Julia Keller Book design: Midland Typesetters Pty Ltd Cover design: Emma Spoehr Cover image: Courtesy of Takver, licensed under a Creative Commons ShareAlike 2.0., https://www.flickr.com/photos/81043308@N00/4038650169 Paperback printed by Griffin Press, South Australia Contents Page Preface vii Editors ix Contributors xi PART I Current challenges 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneer Valley Regional Bike Share System Pilot
    Pioneer Valley Regional Bike Share System Pilot Pioneer Valley Regional Bike Share System Pilot April 2016 Alta Planning + Design | Page 0 Pioneer Valley Regional Bike Share System Pilot Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Business Models ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Business Model Matrix ................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Proposed Business Model............................................................................................................................................. 7 3. System Costs and Revenues .................................................................................................................................................. 9 3.1 Cost Components ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cycling to Work: Not Only a Utilitarian Movement but Also an Embodiment of Meanings and Experiences That Constitute Crucial
    Conclusion This research analysed the different facets of utility cycling in Switzerland, using the example of commuting. We took as our starting point the concept of the cycling system, or velomobility, which underlines the importance of taking into account all elements—not only material and technical but also social, political and symbolic— which influence this practice. From this perspective, we argued that cycling—in terms of volume, frequency, distance, motivation, etc.—depends on the coming together of two potentials. The first of these is motility [11–13] or, more precisely, the indi- viduals’ cycling potential. It is built around access (‘to be able to’ use a means of transport), skills ((‘to know how to’ cycle for utility reasons) and appropriation (‘to want to’ cycle). Individuals’ appropriation of cycling depends on their perception of that mode and of its particularities, which can be interpreted as a confluence of three fundamental dimensions of mobility: movement, meaning and experience in a context of power in regards to the dominant system of automobility [6]. The second of the two potentials is the territory’s hosting potential, or its degree of bikeability, which relates to the spatial context, the available infrastructure and amenities (bicycle urbanism), as well as social and legal norms and rules. In order to identify a large sample of bicycle commuters, we focused on the bike to work scheme, which each year brings together people who commit to cycling to their place of work as often as possible during the months of May and/or June. Nearly 14,000 people completed an online questionnaire addressing the dimensions of velomobility.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mobility Playbook
    Seattle Department of Transportation NEW MOBILITY PLAYBOOK Version 1.0 September 2017 MORE MOBILITY MORE INFORMATION MORE SEATTLE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SDOT PROJECT TEAM INTERAGENCY PROJECT Evan Corey | Project Lead TEAM Andrew Glass Hastings | Division Director, Carol Cooper and Jean Paul Velez | Transit and Mobility King County Metro Tracy Krawczyk | Division Director, Policy Kara Main-Hester | Seattle Department of and Planning Finance and Administrative Services Benjamin de la Peña | Deputy Director for Policy, Sean Bouffiou | King County Records and Planning, Mobility and Right of Way Licensing Services Mayumi Thompson | Communications Mafara Hobson | Communications Director CONSULTANT SUPPORT Scott Kubly | Department of Transportation Joe Iacobucci and Ellen Gottschling | Director Sam Schwartz Engineering Leslie Carlson, Mike Westling, Heidi Nielsen, CITY OF SEATTLE and Erin Halasz | Brink Communications INTERDEPARTMENTAL TEAM Cristina Van Valkenburgh, Mike Estey, EXPERT REVIEWERS Mary Catherine Snyder, Candida Lorenzana, Mollie Pellon and Corinne Kisner | NACTO Ben Smith, Naomi Doerner, and Kyle Rowe | Russell Brooks and Rob Benner | SDOT Transit and Mobility Division Transportation for America Jonathan Lewis | SDOT Policy and Planning Greg Lindsay | New Cities Foundation Division Katja Schechtner | OECD/MIT Media Lab Mark Bandy and Adiam Emery | Stonly Baptiste | Urban.Us SDOT Transportation Operations Division Gabe Klein | CityFi Darby Watson | SDOT Project Development Division Kevin O’Neill | SDOT Street Use Division Michael Mattmiller
    [Show full text]
  • Bike Share Hubs • Defined “No Parking” Areas • System Growth Based on Operator Compliance
    6B City of Transportation Commission Bellevue Study Session DATE: March 8, 2018 TO: Chair Bishop and Members of the Transportation Commission FROM: Andreas Piller, Associate Transportation Planner [email protected] 425-452-2931 Franz Loewenherz, Principal Transportation Planner [email protected] 425-452-4077 SUBJECT: Citywide Bike Share Pilot Program DIRECTION REQUESTED X Action X Discussion X Information At the March 8, 2018 Transportation Commission meeting, staff seeks Commission endorsement of the strategies for implementing a citywide bike share pilot program. In accordance with its Bylaws approved on December 14, 2017, the Commission must also authorize a person to represent this feedback to the City Council. Note: Multiple hyperlinks are included in this memo, requiring extensive Commission consideration. It will not be possible to review these materials in depth in the 60 minutes allotted to this topic at the March 8 meeting. Staff offers to meet with Commissioners to review materials and answer questions in advance of the March 8 meeting. Background Bellevue’s Comprehensive Plan, adopted in August 2015, aims to “maintain and enhance a comprehensive multimodal transportation system to serve all members of the community” (Transportation Element Goal). The plan notes that “mobility in Bellevue means providing people with an assortment of mobility options that help people get where they need to go,” and that this “contributes to a quality of life that Bellevue residents expect, and that attracts employers and businesses” (Transportation Element Introduction). Policies direct the City to “evaluate and facilitate car-sharing and bike sharing programs” (TR-16) and to “support the establishment and operation of a bicycle sharing program in Bellevue” (TR-115).
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Free Floating Bike Share Evaluation Report
    Seattle Department of Transportation 2019 FREE-FLOATING BIKE SHARE EVALUATION REPORT April 2020 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..............................................................................................4 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................5 Seattle’s Vision and Values for Transportation ........................................................5 Background ...............................................................................................................6 Our Approach ............................................................................................................9 2. HOW WELL DID WE ADVANCE OUR GOALS AND HOW CAN WE IMPROVE IN 2020? .................................................................................................15 Key Questions .........................................................................................................16 Goal 1: Support an active, healthy, people-first use of seattle’s streets ...............17 Goal 2: Ensure affordable and equitable service—particularly for cost-burdened communities of color—while expanding access to opportunities .....................23 Goal 3: Be safe and advance our vision zero objectives .........................................30 Goal 4: Fill mobility gaps and improve connections to transit ...............................34 Goal 5: Provide a low-carbon mobility option as part of Seattle’s efforts to reduce carbon emissions ...............................................................................38
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Bicycle Options for Federal Lands: Bike Sharing, Rentals and Employee Fleets
    FHWA-WFL/TD-12-001 JANUARY 2012 EXPLORING BICYCLE OPTIONS FOR FEDERAL LANDS: BIKE SHARING, RENTALS AND EMPLOYEE FLEETS Technical Report published by Technology Deployment Program Western Federal Lands Highway Division Federal Highway Administration 610 East 5th St. Vancouver, WA 98661 For more information or additional copies contact: Susan Law, Planning Team Leader [email protected], 360.619.7840 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-WFL/TD-12-001 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date January 2012 EXPLORING BICYCLE OPTIONS FOR FEDERAL LANDS: BIKE SHARING, RENTALS AND EMPLOYEE FLEETS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Rebecca Gleason, Laurie Miskimins 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Western Transportation Institute P.O. Box 174250 11. Contract or Grant No. Bozeman, MT 59717-4250 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Highway Administration Final Report Western Federal Lands Highway Division August 2009 – July 2011 610 East 5th St. Vancouver, WA 98661 14. Sponsoring Agency Code HFL-17 15. Supplementary Notes COTR: Susan Law – FHWA CFLHD/WFLHD. Advisory Panel Members: Adam Schildge – FTA, Alan Turnbull – NPS RTCA, Andrew Duvall, National Science Foundation IGERT PhD student, Brandon Jutz – FWS, Candace Rutt – CDC, Diana Allen – NPS RTCA, Franz Gimmler – non-motorized consultant, Ivan Levin – Outdoor Foundation, Jane D. Wargo – HHS, Jason Martz – NPS, Jim Evans – NPS, Nathan Caldwell – FWS, Paul DeMaio – Bike Share consultant, Tokey Boswell – NPS. This project was funded by the Fish and Wildlife Service Refuge Road Program.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Cycling’ Contents
    Fiona Rajé and Andrew Saffrey ‘The Value of Cycling’ Contents Acknowledgements 1 Headline fi ndings 3 Executive summary 4 Background 7 The team 8 Methodology 8 Findings 10 Gap Analysis 28 Conclusion 29 References 30 Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the following people and organisations for their contributions, assistance, or responses to requests for information. • Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport – in particular the staff at the John Williams Library • Cycling and Society Research Group • Cyclists’ Touring Club – Brett Nicolle and John Meudell • Department for Transport • European Cyclists’ Federation • Hilary Dreaves – University of Liverpool • Outspoken Delivery – Gary Armstrong • Manuel Calvo • Peter Wood – Open University • Phil Jones Associates – Adrian Lord and Phil Jones (content and production); Antoine François (graphics and typesetting) • Professor John Parkin – University of Western England (quality assurance) • Professor Miles Tight – University of Birmingham • Release the Chicken – Milenne Tanganelli (photography) • Rosalind Readhead • Sustrans • Transport for London – George Weeks The value of cycling 1 Headline Findings Strategic • High-density, cycle-friendly urban form is conducive to achieve agglomeration benef ts economic • Annualised infrastructure costs in compact, less car-dependent metropolises are 33% less benef ts than in low-density, car-oriented ‘sprawl’ • Catering for cycling is steadily rising on the agenda of business leaders and city mayors Local • Cyclists visit local shops more regularly, spending more than users of most other modes of economic transport benef ts • Per square metre, cycle parking delivers 5 times higher retail spend than the same area of car parking • A compact town optimised for walking and cycling can have a “retail density” (spend per square metre) 2.5 times higher than a typical urban centre.
    [Show full text]