DOCSLIB.ORG

Context Study Croatia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Context Study Croatia Quality in Gender+ Equality Policies European Commission Sixth Framework Programme Integrated Project Jasminka Dedi ć and Ana Frank Context Study Croatia Institute for Human Sciences (IWM) Vienna 2008 Preferred citation: Dedi ć, Jasminka and Frank, Ana (2008): Context Study Croatia , QUING Project, Vienna: Institute for Human Sciences (IWM), available at http://www.quing.eu/files/results/ cs_croatia.pdf. DATA TO BE COLLECTED DEFICIENCIES, DEVIATIONS AND INCONSISTENCIES IN EU AND MEMBER STATE’S GENDER+ EQUALITY POLICIES 1. ‘Deficiencies, deviations and inconsistencies in EU and Member State’s gender+ equality laws’ 1.1 Gender+ equality legislation Please summarise the key developments, with dates, in gender equality law as provided by the governmental gender equality unit, i.e. list the legislation that the gender equality unit (or equivalent governmental body) name as (gender+) equality legislation. If important legislation seems to have been omitted by the authority, please comment on this. Legislation Year Main provision(s) Gender Equality Act 1 2003 Prohibits discrimination on the grounds of gender, marital status and sexual orientation in public and private spheres (art. 6); prohibits harassment and sexual harassment (art. 8); imposes obligation on public bodies to adopt action plans for the promotion of gender equality (art. 11); establishes government Office for Gender Equality and Gender Equality Ombudsperson etc. Labour Act (amendments) 2003 Prohibits discrimination in employment (arts. 2.a-2.d) (relates to Directives: 2000/78/EC, 2002/73/EC) Act on Protection from 2003 Qualifies domestic violence as Domestic Violence a misdemeanour, and defines “domestic violence”, who is considered to be a family member, and types and purpose of the sanctions Family Act 2003 Consolidates family legislation with the EU acquis ; improves some institutes comprised in the 1998 Family Act; provided clearer definition of extra- marital union Act on Same-Sex Unions 2003 Prohibits the discrimination on the grounds of same-sex union and sexual orientation (art. 21); defines a same-sex union, sets the conditions who can establish a same-sex union and enjoy the rights arising from such union 1 On 16 January 2008, the Constitutional Court (no. U-I / 2696 /2003) abolished the Gender Equality Act due to irregularities in legislative procedure and ordered the legislator to comply the Act with the Constitution until 15 July 2008. 2 In addition to these, several other pieces of legislation are listed on the web site of the Office for Gender Equality, such as Media Act (2004), Political Parties Act (1993), Act on the Election of Members of Representative Bodies of Local and County Self-Government (2005) etc. 1.2 EU Policy and Member State Law: Comparisons and Struggles 2 Have there been disputes in your country over significant parts of EU Directives on gender? Are there significant parts of EU Directives on gender equality that have not been implemented into national law? If some aspects are not transposed, what are they? Have there been disputes (1995- 2007) between the EU and the country over transposition? Or within the country over this process? Or where local/national groups have gone direct to the EU? If so, what is the location of the dispute (e.g. intervention by Commission, Court of Justice; national court)? What was the outcome? All these questions are very difficult to answer exactly, because the transposition process is so complex. EU Directives are transposed into member state legislation in very different ways using different procedures and different terminology and legal frames too. The aim is to collect all the information that is available already for your country in the table below, using secondary literature. Please fill in one table for each significant issue, Please consider the following examples: include if relevant; omit if not; add any others that are relevant in your country. Examples: equal pay & equal treatment; sexual harassment & discrimination; equality bodies; civil society involvement; parental leave and the organisation of working time (example provided). 3 Explanation to the tables below: Croatia obtained the status of a candidate country for the accession to the EU only in June 2004, so there have been no legal disputes between Croatia and EU institutions concerning the transposition of the EU acquis yet. What is particularly striking is that civil society actors, particularly the women’s NGOs, are virtually invisible in the EU harmonization process. Namely, apart from legal experts in the EU law 4 civil society is rarely referring to the EU gender equality legislation. Particularly the women’s organisations organised within the Women’s Network of Croatia, when criticizing the government’s failure to provide for full gender equality, almost exclusively refer to domestic legislation and action plans, and to global human rights standards for the protection of women’s rights, such as CEDAW, the Beijing platform, the Millennium Development Goals, ILO standards etc. 5 Of course, women’s NGOs were actively involved in the preparation of the Gender Equality Act (2003), however, the Act was an outcome of two independent drafts; one designed by “B.a.B.e. – Group for Women’s Human Rights”, which was largely influenced by CEDAW and Norwegian gender equality acts, and the other was designed by the Department of European Law within the Faculty of Law in Zagreb that mainly followed the EU gender equality directives (see Timelines on Policy Debates in Croatia, p. 6). On the other hand, civil society actors have not been involved in the changes of the labour legislation in accordance with the EU social and labour legislation since the harmonization process started. Therefore, we wouldn’t be mistaken if we say that EU gender equality is a rather marginal issue in the discussions on gender equality in Croatia, which is (still) predominantly focused on women’s human rights, and the EU harmonization process largely remains within the government’s domain. Consequently, there have 2 Directives: http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/gender_equality/legislation/legalacts_en.html . ECJ cases: http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/gender_equality/legislation/case_law_en.html ; More info on transposition: http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/fundamental_rights/policy/aneval/legnet_en.htm#comp ). 3 Other gender+ equality related directives you might want to consider include: Directive 75/117/EEC on the principle of equal pay for men and women; Directive 79/7/EEC on the principle of equal treatment for men and women in social security; Directive 86/378/EEC on principle of equal treatment for men and women in occupational social security schemes; Directive 86/613/EEC on equal treatment between self employed men and women; Directive 92/85/EEC on the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers; Directive 97/80/EC on the burden of proof in cases of discrimination based on sex; Directive 2000/78 on equal treatment in employment and occupation. 4 Such as prof. Siniša Rodin from the Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb, whose legal team elaborated the draft of Gender Equality Act (see Timelines of Policy Debates in Croatia), and edited a book “ Jednakost muškarca i žene – pravo i politika u EU i Hrvatskoj” (Equality between a man and a woman – law and politics in the EU and Croatia ) in 2003 that deals with the political background and normative regulation of gender equality in the European Union and the Republic of Croatia as a candidate for EU accession (see State-of-art report on Croatia). 5 For example, see annual reports of the Women’s Network of Croatia on women’s human rights in Croatia. 3 been no legal disputes concerning the transposition of the EU gender equality legislation into Croatian legal order. Unfortunately, no information could be found on the involvement of social partners (i.e. trade unions and employers’ organisations) in the harmonization process, however, it seems that employers have not contended the transposition of anti-discrimination, equal pay and other EU labour standards, as these already existed in the Croatian labour legislation. Issue Equal pay/equal treatment Prior to Directive Yes – Labour Act (1995) adopted prior to Directive 2000/78/EC includes additional inequality grounds; No – some amendments have been accepted after the Directives 75/117/EEC, 2000/78/EC and 2002/73/EC were adopted; art. 2 (equal treatment) of the Labour Act was amended to provide for anti-discrimination guarantees in employment (prohibition of indirect discrimination, shift the burden of proof, compensation in case of discrimination, procedural guarantees etc.); art. 82 (equal pay) was amended in accordance with art. 141 of the EC Treaty Legislation 1995 Labour Act (arts. 2, 82) transposing 2003 Labour Act (amendments); arts. 2.a-2.d, 82 Directive 2003 Gender Equality Act (GEA) Fully transposed Yes Provisions not No transposed Is leg. better than YES Directive Better how and Labour Act covers more inequality grounds than required by Directive since when? 2000/78/EC – since 1995 GEA imposes obligation on all public bodies to introduce affirmative actions to achieve full equality between women and men – since 2003 Content of No disputes over gender equality in relation to EU policies in Croatia dispute(s) + date Parties to the / dispute Location / Outcome of the / dispute Civil society Civil society was actively engaged in the elaboration of the Gender Equality engagement Act (see explanation above) Intersections According to para. 1, art. 2 of the Labour Act, discrimination is prohibited on the following grounds: race, colour, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, family responsibilities, age, language, religion, political or other belief, national or social background, financial status, birth, social status, membership or non- membership in a political party or trade union, and physical or psychological difficulties. Other notes Issue Sexual harassment and discrimination Prior to Directive No Legislation 2003 Labour Act (amendments): arts. 2.b & 22.a transposing 2003 Gender Equality Act (art.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: ICR0000536 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (IBRD-46130 JPN-26113) ON A Public Disclosure Authorized LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$ 5 MILLION TO THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA FOR A COURT AND BANKRUPTCY ADMINISTRATION PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized June 29, 2007 Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Department Europe and Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective May 14, 2007) Currency Unit = Croatian Kuna 1.00 = US$ 0.18 US$ 1.00 = 5.41 Kuna FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CPS Country Partnership Strategy CBAP - Court and Bankruptcy Administration Project (the “Project”) EU - European Union FINA - Financial Agency (formerly “ZAP”) FMS - Financial Management Specialist IBRD - International Bank for Reconstruction and Development ICMS - Integrated Court Management System ICT - Information and Communications Technology ISR - Implementation Status Results and Reports KPI - Key Performance Indicators LIL - Learning and Innovation Loan MOF - Ministry of Finance MOJ - Ministry of Justice M&E - Monitoring and Evaluation NCSC National Center for State Courts PDO - Project Development Objective PMU - Project Management Unit SFRY - Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia TTL - Task Team Leader USAID - United States Agency for International Development Vice President: Shigeo Katsu Country Director: Anand Seth Sector Manager: Ronald Myers Project Team Leader: Irina Kichigina ICR Team Leader: Craig Neal CROATIA Court and Bankruptcy Administration Project CONTENTS Data Sheet A. Basic Information B. Key Dates C. Ratings Summary D. Sector and Theme Codes E. Bank Staff F. Results Framework Analysis G. Ratings of Project Performance in ISRs H.
    [Show full text]
  • PREPARATORY MEETING for the 12Th Meeting of the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee
    Mission of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union PREPARATORY MEETING for the 12th meeting of the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee 18 November 2010 Brussels Exchange of views with Mr. Branko Baričević Ambassador of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Croatia-EU Relations........................................................................................................... 4 I.1. Progress of the Accession Negotiations ................................................................................ 4 I.2. Intensified political dialogue with the European Parliament......................................................... 5 I. 3. Intensified dialogue with the Committee of Regions................................................................. 7 I. 4. Lisbon Treaty ............................................................................................................ 7 II. Political & Administrative criteria ........................................................................................... 8 II.1. Reform of the Judiciary................................................................................................. 8 Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia ........................................................................ 8 Independence – implementation of the uniform, objective and transparent criteria for the selection of the judicial officials ........................................................................................................... 8 Professionalism
    [Show full text]
  • Financing the 2009 – 2010 Presidential Elections in Croatia: Conflicting Interpretations of Campaign Finance Laws**
    Zbornik PFZ, 61, (1) 41-64 (2011) 41 FinAnCing tHe 2009 – 2010 PReSidentiAL eLeCtionS in CRoAtiA: ConFLiCting inteRPRetAtionS oF CAmPAign FinAnCe LAWS** Professor Robert Podolnjak, Ph. D.* UDK: 342.849.2(497.5) 324.511(497.5) Izvorni znanstveni rad Primljeno: kolovoz 2010. The author discusses two fundamental problems relating to the funding of election campaigns in the recent presidential election in Croatia. The first pro- blem derives from the incongruence of two election campaign financing acts in Croatia – the 2004 Act on Financing the Election Campaign for the Election of the President of the Republic of Croatia and the 2007 Act on the Financing of Political Parties, Independent Lists and Candidates. The latter and the more important problem in funding the latest presidential election campaign was that the competent state bodies, authorized to implement the regulations dealing with the funding of the election campaign, were deeply divided on the question which of the two acts is relevant in regulating specific issues. The differences in the way the State Electoral Commission, the Constitutional Court, the State Audit Office and the Ministry of Administration interpreted legal regulations precluded the effective sanctioning of offences in the latest presidential election campaign in Croatia. Key words: presidential elections, Croatia, funding of the election campaign According to the final report of the OSCE mission in Croatia, the latest pre- sidential elections in Croatia (first round in December 2009 and run-off in Ja- nuary 2010), generally speaking, fulfilled the international electoral standards. However, one of the strongest reservations expressed was about the regulation of the electoral campaign financing.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatian Helsinki Committee for Human Rights
    CROATIAN HELSINKI COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Zagreb, December 15, 2003 MEDIA AND ELECTIONS 2003 ANALYSIS OF DAILY NEWSPAPERS Alija Hodžic The Media and Elections 2003 monitoring project covered the items in daily newspapers, which directly or indirectly related to the activities of the relevant actors of political life in Croatia. The method used in the research was the analysis of the content. The analysis included items, which were published in six daily newspapers (Vjesnik, Vecernji list, Jutarnji list, Slobodna Dalmacija, Novi list and Glas Slavonije) in the period since October 12until November 22, 2003. First three newspapers belong to the category of national newspapers, while other three belong to the category of regional newspapers. Two daily newspapers are majority state-owned (Vjesnik and Slobodna Dalmacija) and two are owned by domestic (mostly small) stock owners (Novi list and Glas Slavonije), while one is half-owned by domestic and foreign owners (Jutarnji list, which is the only new established daily after 1990), and one is majority- owned by foreigners. The monitored period, in spite of the fact that it represents the continuous flow, has not been analysed as a unique entity. It was divided in two separate entities: the period, which includes time of the official pre-electoral campaign (which started on November 6) and the period prior to the beginning of the official campaign (October 12 until November 5). The reasons for such division are found in the basic differences between these two periods. Specifically in the period of the official pre-electoral campaign, the election candidates were well known (political parties, coalitions, independent candidates, as well as individuals).
    [Show full text]
  • 18EN.Doc PE 423.951
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2004 2009 Committee on Foreign Affairs ACTIVITY REPORT (6th Legislature: 2004 – 2009) ----------------------- 30 April 2009 AFET Secretariat CM 782818EN.doc PE 423.951 CM 782818EN.doc PE 423.951 FOREWORD BY JACEK SARYUSZ-WOLSKI, CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS (2007 – 2009) The report before you represents the culmination of the past five years (2004 – 2009) of intensive and productive activity by the Committee on Foreign Affairs. Simply looked at in terms of 'raw' statistics, the Committee's work in the course of the 6th legislature has been pretty impressive by any standards: in addition to our regular committee meetings held at least twice-monthly, we have held 72 extraordinary meetings to respond to crisis situations and issues, and prepared, debated and adopted a total of 259 reports, opinions and resolutions which were then voted on in plenary. The Committee was addressed a total of 397 times by visiting speakers from outside the EU and from within, including 176 exchanges with the Commission and the Council, notably with the High Representative for CFSP, Javier Solana (10 times), Commissioners Rehn (17 times) and Ferrero-Waldner (15 times), and all 20 EU Special Representatives over the 5-year period. Regular briefings by the Council Presidency-in-office post-GAERC or on Presidency priorities (63), as well as preparatory visits by AFET's Enlarged Bureau to the Member State holding the forthcoming Presidency (8), meetings of the Conference of Foreign Affairs Committee Chairmen (COFACC) held in the Presidency country (9), and regular bilateral meetings in Brussels between AFET and representatives of the foreign affairs and defence committees of national parliaments (6), have strengthened the Committee's contacts and involvement with each Presidency and fostered its involvement in CFSP issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Zapisnik 16. Sjednice Hrvatskoga Sabora
    HRVATSKI SABOR ZAPISNIK ŠESNAESTE SJEDNICE HRVATSKOGA SABORA održane 21.,22.,23.,28.,29. i 30 rujna i 5.,6.,7.,12.,13. i 14. listopada 2005. Zagreb, rujan-listopad 2005. HRVATSKI SABOR Zapisnik šesnaeste sjednice Hrvatskoga sabora održane 21.,22.,23.,28.,29. i 30 rujna i 5.,6.,7.,12.,13. i 14. listopada 2005. Sjednicu Hrvatskoga sabora, 21. rujna 2005. godine, u 9,34 sati otvorio je predsjednik Vladimir Šeks. Na početku sjednice, kojom je započelo redovito zasjedanje Hrvatskoga sabora odana je počast Domovini, izvođenjem himne "Lijepa naša Domovino". Hrvatski sabor je minutom šutnje odao počast palim hrvatskim braniteljima i svim civilnim žrtvama iz Domovinskog rata. Zapisnici 14. i 15. sjednice prihvaćeni su u predloženom tekstu. Na početku sjednice održane 5. listopada 2005. godine, zastupnik Pero Kovačević, u ime Kluba zastupnika HSP-a, predložio je da se zastupnicima obrati predsjednik Vlade Republike Hrvatske, a u svezi proglašavanja epikontinentalnog pojasa slovenskog parlamenta, te zatražio da se i raspravi Prijedlog odluke o izmjenama i dopunama odluke o proširenju jurisdikcije Republike Hrvatske na Jadranskom moru. Zastupnici Zlatko Tomčić, u ime Kluba zastupnika HSS-a, Damir Kajin, u ime Kluba zastupnika IDS-a i Dragutin Lesar, u ime Kluba zastupnika HNS-PGS-a, također su zatražili da zastupnici provedu raspravu o novonastaloj situaciji, kao i da predsjednik sazove prošireno Predsjedništvo. Predsjednik Vlade Republike Hrvatske, dr.sc. Ivo Sanader, podnio je izvješće i stajalište Vlade Republike Hrvatske vezano za donošenje zakona u Slovenskom parlamentu o epikonatinentalnom pojasu i ribolovno-ekološkoj zoni. Predsjednik Hrvatskoga sabora izvjestio je zastupnike da je na Predsjedništvu Sabora postignut dogovor svih klubova zastupnika, osim Kluba nezavisnih zastupnika, koji nisu prisustvovali sjednici Predsjedništva, da se donese usaglašen tekst Deklaracije u povudu Zakona o zaštićenoj ekološkoj zoni i epikontinentalnom pojasu, što ga je donio slovenski parlament, dana 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Gong Annual Report 2006
    GONG ANNUAL REPORT 2006 Written by Damir Azenic (narrative) and Albert Jedrejcic (financial) Edited by Suzana Jasic GONG Annual Report // 2006 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STRATEGIC OUTLINE In July 2006, having in mind new developments in Croatian society followed by new GONG projects and activities implemented during 2006, we adopted a new Strategic Plan of Activities for the next period. All existing programs and projects, complemented with newly developed activities, were lined up according to the following strategic guidelines and programmatic areas: 1. REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY - includes GONG election related activities aiming to contribute to reaching higher democratic standards of electoral system, enabling higher transparency and civic participation 2. PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY – includes GONG activities aiming to contribute to increased quality and scale of participatory democracy in Croatia as well as higher citizens’ engagement in political processes 3. CIVIL SOCIETY – includes GONG activities aiming to encourage systematic cooperation of CSOs in Croatia and development of support mechanisms for CSOs, and promotion of civic activism and civic participation on the local and regional levels 4. INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS – includes GONG activities aimed at promotion of standards of representative and participatory democracy in transition countries in Europe and cooperation with organizations from developed western countries. REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY 1. Election Monitoring GONG regularly monitors activities of the bodies responsible for conducting and organizing elections and election campaigns, but also encourages, organizes and educates citizens to monitor elections as non- partisan observers. In the course of 2006, several re-run and repeated local election, as well as a number of elections for neighborhood councils were held. These elections were monitored by 88 observers in total.
    [Show full text]
  • Zapisnik 18. Sjednice Hrvatskoga Sabora
    HRVATSKI SABOR ZAPISNIK OSAMNAESTE SJEDNICE HRVATSKOGA SABORA održane 25.,26. I 27. siječnja i 1.,2.,3.,8.,9., 10.,15.,16. i 17. veljače 2006. Zagreb, siječanj-veljača 2006. HRVATSKI SABOR Zapisnik osamnaeste sjednice Hrvatskoga sabora održane 25.,26.i 27. siječnja i 1.,2.,3.,8.,9., 10.,15.,16. i 17. veljače 2006. Sjednicu Hrvatskoga sabora, 25. siječnja 2006. godine, u 9,30 sati otvorio je predsjednik Vladimir Šeks. Na početku sjednice, kojom je započelo redovito zasjedanje Hrvatskoga sabora odana je počast Domovini, izvođenjem himne "Lijepa naša Domovino". Hrvatski sabor je minutom šutnje odao počast svim palim hrvatskim braniteljima i svim civilnim žrtvama rata u borbi za slodobu i demokratsku Hrvatsku državu. Zapisnik 17. sjednice prihvaćen je u predloženom tekstu. Tijekom sjednice 25. siječnja 2006. godine zastupnica Milanka Opačić, u ime Kluba zastupnika SDP-a, iznijela je prigovor, a u svezi kršenja Poslovnika Hrvatskoga sabora prekidom sjednice na aktualnom satu, gdje četvero zastupnika nije imalo mogućnost postaviti svoje zastupničko pitanje. Predsjedavajući Doma, potpredsjednik Luka Bebić izvjestio je zastupnike da će četvero zastupnika koji nisu imali mogućnost postaviti svoja pitanja zbog prekida sjednice, to moći ostvariti na početku slijedećeg aktualnog sata. Tijekom sjednice 26. siječnja 2006. godine, zastupnik Željko Pecek, u ime Kluba zastupnika HSS-a zatražio je da predsjednik Vlade Republike Hrvatske izvjesti zastupnike i hrvatsku javnost što je do sada učinjeno za obranu hrvatskih generala, te ima li Vlada plan kako će to odraditi do završetka procesa, a u svezi raznih komentara i natpisa objavljenih u tisku nekoliko zadnjih dana. Predsjednik Hrvatskoga sabora, Vladimir Šeks, izvjestio je zastupnike da će ovaj prijedlog prenijeti predsjedniku Vlade Republike Hrvatske.
    [Show full text]
  • CROATIAN PARLIAMENT National Council for Monitoring Anti-Corruption Strategy Implementation
    CROATIAN PARLIAMENT National Council for Monitoring Anti-Corruption Strategy Implementation REPORT ON THE WORK OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR MONITORING ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION in the period from 21 May 2008 to 30 May 2009 1. INTRODUCTION In compliance with its obligation under the Decision of the Croatian Parliament Establishing the National Council for Monitoring the Implementation of the National Anti-Corruption Programme, the National Council submits the present Report on its work for the period from 21 May 2008 to 30 May 2009. In June 2008, the Croatian Parliament and Government adopted a new Anti-Corruption Strategy and Acton Plan with the clear objective of reinforcing an appropriate and efficient institutional framework as a factor of crucial importance to successful efforts to combat corruption. This implies appropriate coordination and cooperation among institutions implementing the anti- corruption policy and their efficient supervision. The experience gained in the implementation of the previous National Programme (2006-2008) has highlighted the need to strengthen the institutional framework with a view to increasing efficiency in the implementation of the Strategy and Action Plan. The National Council for Monitoring the Implementation of the National Anti-Corruption Programme (hereinafter, the “National Council”) was established in June 2006 and its task was to supervise the implementation of the National Programme 2006-2008. The National Council is composed of parliamentarians, employers and union representatives, representatives of non- governmental organizations dealing with corruption issues, representatives of the academic community, professionals and media representatives. The National Council is chaired by a representative of the opposition in the Croatian Parliament. The experience gained in the implementation of the National Programme 2006-2008 has pointed out the need to reinforce the role of the National Council, which was formally achieved by preparing the new Strategy and Action Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. International Conference „Alternative Dispute Resolution – Possibilities of Cooperation Between Judiciary and Economic Sector“
    HRVATSKA OBRTNIČKA KOMORA 2. International Conference „Alternative Dispute Resolution – Possibilities of Cooperation between Judiciary and Economic Sector“ under the auspices of Ms. Jadranka Kosor, Prime Minister of the Republic of Croatia 18th and 19th October 2011 at 9.00 hours Croatian Chamber of Trades and Crafts, Conference Hall „Velika dvorana“ Ilica 49/II, Zagreb DAY ONE____________________________________________________________________ 8.15 Registration of participants 9.00 Welcome Addresses Dragutin Ranogajec, President of Croatian Chamber of Trades and Crafts mr. sc. Josip Kos, High Commercial Court of Republic of Croatia, Judge ret., President of Court of Honour and Mediation Centre at CCTC 9.10 Opening of the Conference Jadranka Kosor, Prime Minister of Government of the Republic of Croatia Paul Vandoren, Head of Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Croatia (tbc) 9.20 Introductory Speeches Dražen Bošnjaković, Minister of Justice of the Republic of Croatia (tbc) mr. sc. Đuro Popijač, Minister of Economy, Labour and Entrepreneurship of the Republic of Croatia (tbc) 9.30 Part one - Increasing the Efficiency of Justice - Stimulus for Economic Development New Regulations to Improve Efficiency of Justice Judiciary Board of Croatian Parliament - Ana Lovrin, dipl. iur., president Ensuring Conditions for Economic Development by Increasing the Legal Security Economic Board of Croatian Parliament – Prof.dr. Dragan Kovačević, president The Role of the Commercial Courts in the Economic System of Republic of Croatia High
    [Show full text]
  • Pravni Fakultet U Zagrebu Ekonomski Fakultet U Zagrebu Ivo Josipović Željka Antunović Stjepan Mesić Mate Babić Zoran Milano
    Pravni fakultet u Zagrebu Ekonomski fakultet u Zagrebu Ivo Josipović Željka Antunović Stjepan Mesić Mate Babić Zoran Milanović Martina Dalić Ivica Račan Ivan Jakovčić Josip Leko Ljubo Jurčić Boris Šprem Petar Krste Vladimir Šeks Gordan Maras Damir Bajs Branko Mikša Zvonimir Baletić Neven Mimica Božo Biškupić Zdravko Tomac Josip Boljkovac Mladen Vedriš Dražen Bošnjaković Nadan Vidošević Onesin Cvitan Ivan Šuker Jadranka Kosor Branko Grgić Ana Lovrin Ante Kotromanović Ivan Milas Siniša Hajdaš Dončić Ljerka Mintas – Hodak Darko Lorencin Davorin Mlakar Mihael Zmajlović Hrvoje Vojković Veljko Ostojić Berislav Rončević Stjepan Zdunić Davorin Rudolf Vladimir Veselica Smiljko Sokol Zoran Jašić Zvonimir Šeparović Božo Prka Ivan Šimonović Nenad Porges Vesna Škare – Ožbolt Milan Kovač Orsat Miljenić Mato Crkvenac Milan Ramljak Hrvoj Vojković Bosiljko Mišetić Pave Župan Rusković Josip Manolić Đuro Popijač Nikica Valentić Bianca Matković Zlatko Mateša Borislav Škegro Marijan Ramušćak Ivan Penić Marijan Hanžeković Šime Đodan Miroslav Šeparović Ivan Vekić Stjepan Ivanišević Medicinski fakultet u Zagrebu Fakultet političkih znanosti Neven Ljubičić Davor Božinović Darko Milinović Gordan Jandroković Domagoj Ivan Milošević Milanka Opačić Marijan Mlinarić Zdravko Tomac Juraj Njavro Ante Kotromanović Rajko Ostojić Tihomir Jakovina Željko Reiner Ivica Pančić Andro Vlahušić Šime Lučin Zdenko Škrabalo Tomislav Ivić Ana Stavljenić – Rukavina Mate Granić Andrija Hebrang Ivica Kostović Dragan Primorac Slobodan Uzelac Mirando Mrsić Ostalo Inozemstvo Alojz Tušek
    [Show full text]
  • Hırvatistan'ın Siyasi Yapısı Ve Seçimler
    Hırvatistan’ın Siyasi Yapısı ve Seçimler Atacan Şahin (Siyasal İletişim Enstitüsü) Hırvatistan, 1990 yılında kabul edilen anayasayla birlikte; Demokratik Cumhuriyet sıfatını kazanmıştır. Bu dönemde Hırvatistan 2000 yılına kadar yarı başkanlık sistemiyle yönetilmiştir. Fakat 2000 yılının kasım ayında anayasasının değiştirilmesiyle birlikte devlet parlamenter sisteme geçiş yapmıştır. Cumhurbaşkanı Hırvatistan anayasasına göre Cumhurbaşkanı devletin başıdır. Cumhurbaşkanı 5 yıllık görev süresi için seçilir. Fakat anayasaya göre cumhurbaşkanının 2 dönemden fazla seçilme hakkı yoktur. Buna ek olarak cumhurbaşkanı ordunun da başkomutanıdır. Ve Hırvatistan devletini temsil eder. Fakat bunlara rağmen cumhurbaşkanı başbakana göre daha az yetkilerle donatılmıştır. Daha simgesel bir yapısı vardır başbakanın yetkileriyle kıyaslandığında. Cumhurbaşkanının resmi ikametgahı “Başkanlık Konağı”( Predsjednički dvori ). Başkanlık Konağı Zagrep’te bulunmakta ve ilk defa 1992 yılında kullanılmaya başlandı. (Konak 1962’de Tito döneminde yapılmıştır.) Devletin Cumhurbaşkanı Stephan Mesiç’dir. (18 Şubat 2000’den beri) Başbakanlık Hırvatistan hükümeti; başbakan , 2 başbakan yardımcısı ve 14 bakanlığın bulunduğu bakanlar kurulu tarafından yönetilir. Hükümet yasama , bütçe, iç ve dış tüm ilişkilerin sorumluluğunu da yüklenmektedir. Başbakan Ivo Sanader’dir. Başkan Yardımcıları: Jadranka Kosor , Damir Polancec , Dışişleri bakanı ve AB baş müzakerecisi : Gordan Jandrokovic , Maliye bakanı: Ivan Suker , Savunma Bakanı: Branko Vukelic, İçişleri Bakanı: Berislav Roncevic
    [Show full text]