TO the OSCE, UN Information on the New Government of the Republic of Croatia Mr. Chairman, We Would Like to Complete the Annou

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

TO the OSCE, UN Information on the New Government of the Republic of Croatia Mr. Chairman, We Would Like to Complete the Annou

PC.DEL/17/08 STALNA MISIJA REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE PRI OESS-U, 17 January 2008 UN-U I MEĐUNARODNIM ORGANIZACIJAMA U BEČU ENGLISH only PERMANENT MISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA TO THE OSCE, UN AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS A-1010 Wien, Bartensteingasse 16/7 - Tel: (43-1) 535-0137, Fax: (43-1) 535-0134 - E-mail: [email protected] Information on the new Government of the Republic of Croatia (As delivered by H.E. Ambassador Vladimir MATEK, Permanent Representative 17 January 2008, at the 696th PC, under A.o.B.) Mr. Chairman, We would like to complete the announcement made last week on the formation of the Government in Croatia and on the appointment of one of the representatives of Independent Democratic Serbian Party (SDSS), as one of the four Deputy Prime Ministers. Mr. Slobodan Uzelac will be in charge of the coordination of regional development, reconstruction and return issues, as well as of the other elements foreseen by the coalition agreement between the Prime Minister's party (HDZ) and the SDSS. Yesterday evening was distributed the Spot Report of the Office in Zagreb on this issue, so there is no need to elaborate this issue further. The Government's composition with all the names and functions will be given in the distribution with the text of this Information. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Prime Minister: Dr. Ivo SANADER Deputy Prime Ministers : Ms. Jadranka KOSOR (also Minister for Family, Veterans' Affairs and Intergenerational Solidarity) Ms. Đurđa Adlešič (in charge of coordination of Domestic Political Questions) Mr. Damir POLANČEC (also Minister of Economy, Labour and Entrepreneurship) Prof. Dr. Slobodan UZELAC (in charge of Regional Development, Reconstruction and Return) Ministers: Mr. Gordan JANDROKOVIĆ, Minister for Foreign Affairs and European Integration Mr. Ivan ŠUKER, Minister of Finance Mr. Branko VUKELIĆ, Minister of Defense Mr. Berislav RONČEVIĆ, Minister of the Interior Ms. Ana LOVRIN, Minister of Justice Mr. Božidar KALMETA, Minister of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure Mr. Božidar PANKRETIĆ, Minister of Agriculture, Fishery and Rural Development Ms. Marina MATULOVIĆ-DROPULIĆ, Minister of Environmental Protection, Physical Planning and Construction Mr. Darko MILINOVIĆ, Minister of Health and Social Welfare Prof. dr. Dragan PRIMORAC, Minister of Science, Education and Sports Mr. Božo BIŠKUPIĆ, Minister of Culture Mr. Petar ČOBANKOVIĆ, Minister of Regional Development, Forestry and Water Management Mr. Damir BAJS, Minister of Tourism .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

From Understanding to Cooperation Promoting Interfaith Encounters to Meet Global Challenges
20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS FROM UNDERSTANDING TO COOPERATION PROMOTING INTERFAITH ENCOUNTERS TO MEET GLOBAL CHALLENGES Zagreb, 7 - 8 December 2017 20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS / 3 PROGRAMME 10:00-12:30 hrs / Sessions I and II The role of religion in European integration process: expectations, potentials, limits Wednesday, 6 December 10:00-11:15 hrs Session I 20.30 hrs. / Welcome Reception hosted by the Croatian Delegation / Memories and lessons learned during 20 years of Dialogue Thursday, 7 December Co-Chairs: György Hölvényi MEP and Jan Olbrycht MEP, Co-Chairmen of 09:00 hrs / Opening the Working Group on Intercultural Activities and Religious Dialogue György Hölvényi MEP and Jan Olbrycht MEP, Co-Chairmen of the Working Opening message: Group on Intercultural Activities and Religious Dialogue Dubravka Šuica MEP, Head of Croatian Delegation of the EPP Group Alojz Peterle MEP, former Responsible of the Interreligious Dialogue Welcome messages Interventions - Mairead McGuinness, First Vice-President of the European Parliament, - Gordan Jandroković, Speaker of the Croatian Parliament responsible for dialogue with religions (video message) - Joseph Daul, President of the European People’ s Party - Joseph Daul, President of the European People’ s Party - Vito Bonsignore, former Vice-Chairman of the EPP Group responsible for - Andrej Plenković, Prime Minister of Croatia Dialogue with Islam - Mons. Prof. Tadeusz Pieronek, Chairman of the International Krakow Church Conference Organizing Committee - Stephen Biller, former EPP Group Adviser responsible for Interreligious Dialogue Discussion 20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS / 5 4 /20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS 11:15-12:30 hrs.
[Show full text]
World Bank Document
Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: ICR0000536 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (IBRD-46130 JPN-26113) ON A Public Disclosure Authorized LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$ 5 MILLION TO THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA FOR A COURT AND BANKRUPTCY ADMINISTRATION PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized June 29, 2007 Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Department Europe and Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective May 14, 2007) Currency Unit = Croatian Kuna 1.00 = US$ 0.18 US$ 1.00 = 5.41 Kuna FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CPS Country Partnership Strategy CBAP - Court and Bankruptcy Administration Project (the “Project”) EU - European Union FINA - Financial Agency (formerly “ZAP”) FMS - Financial Management Specialist IBRD - International Bank for Reconstruction and Development ICMS - Integrated Court Management System ICT - Information and Communications Technology ISR - Implementation Status Results and Reports KPI - Key Performance Indicators LIL - Learning and Innovation Loan MOF - Ministry of Finance MOJ - Ministry of Justice M&E - Monitoring and Evaluation NCSC National Center for State Courts PDO - Project Development Objective PMU - Project Management Unit SFRY - Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia TTL - Task Team Leader USAID - United States Agency for International Development Vice President: Shigeo Katsu Country Director: Anand Seth Sector Manager: Ronald Myers Project Team Leader: Irina Kichigina ICR Team Leader: Craig Neal CROATIA Court and Bankruptcy Administration Project CONTENTS Data Sheet A. Basic Information B. Key Dates C. Ratings Summary D. Sector and Theme Codes E. Bank Staff F. Results Framework Analysis G. Ratings of Project Performance in ISRs H.
[Show full text]
PREPARATORY MEETING for the 12Th Meeting of the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee
Mission of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union PREPARATORY MEETING for the 12th meeting of the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee 18 November 2010 Brussels Exchange of views with Mr. Branko Baričević Ambassador of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Croatia-EU Relations........................................................................................................... 4 I.1. Progress of the Accession Negotiations ................................................................................ 4 I.2. Intensified political dialogue with the European Parliament......................................................... 5 I. 3. Intensified dialogue with the Committee of Regions................................................................. 7 I. 4. Lisbon Treaty ............................................................................................................ 7 II. Political & Administrative criteria ........................................................................................... 8 II.1. Reform of the Judiciary................................................................................................. 8 Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia ........................................................................ 8 Independence – implementation of the uniform, objective and transparent criteria for the selection of the judicial officials ........................................................................................................... 8 Professionalism
[Show full text]
Anticorruption Policy in Croatia: Benchmark for Eu
1 Damir Grubiša Anti-Corruption Policy in Croatia: a Benchmark for EU Accession In 1998, the European Commission concluded in its evaluation of the central and east European countries' requests for EU membership in the context of the preparation for Agenda 2000 that the fight against political corruption in these countries needed to be upgraded. The Commission's report on the progress of each candidate country can be summed up as follows: "The efforts undertaken by candidate countries are not always adequate to the entity of the problem itself. Although some of these countries initiate new programmes for the control and prevention of corruption, it is too early for a judgment on the efficiency of such measures. A lack of determination can be seen in confronting this problem and in rooting out corruption in the greatest part of the candidate countries". Similar evaluations were repeated in subsequent reports on the progress of candidate countries from central and east Europe. Accordingly, it was concluded in 2001 that political corruption is a serious problem in five out of ten countries of that region: Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Poland, Romania and Slovakia, and a constant problem in three more countries: Hungary, Lithuania and Latvia. The Commission refrained from expressing critical remarks only in the case of two countries – Estonia and Slovenia. Up to 2002, only eight out of fifteen member states ratified the basic instrument that the EU had adopted against corruption, namely the EU Convention on the Safeguarding of Economic Interests of the European Communities. Some of the founding members of the European Community were rated as countries with a "high level of corruption" – Germany, France and, specifically, Italy.
[Show full text]
Shadow Report on the Implementation of the Framework Convention for Protection of National Minorities in the Republic of Croatia
Center for Peace, Legal Advice and Psychosocial Assistance SHADOW REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Third monitoring cycle 2004 – 2010 February 2010 0 CONTENT I Information on the Center for Peace, Legal Advice and Psychosocial Assistance 2 II Introductory Remarks on the Shadow Report 3 III Application of the Convention Article by Article 6 Article 3 6 Article 4 8 Article 5 15 Article 6 16 Article 7 19 Article 8 19 Article 9 20 Articles 10 and 11 23 Articles 12, 13 and 14 28 Article 15 30 Article 16 39 IV Action Plan of the Republic of Croatia for the Implementation of the Constitutional Law on the Rights of National Minorities, June 2008 40 V Concluding Remarks and Recommendations 42 1 I Information on the Center for Peace, Legal Advice and Psychosocial Assistance – Vukovar Center for Peace, Legal Advice and Psychosocial Assistance is local, nongovernmental, non-political, non-partisan, nonprofit, humanitarian association that works on protection and promotion of human rights, development of democracy and interethnic relations in the Republic of Croatia. The Center was established on and works since 1 August 1996. Main activities of the Center: - Provision of free legal advices and free legal aid, - Reporting on and analyzing human rights situation, with special attention paid to the rights of refugees, displaced persons and persons belonging to national minorities in the Republic of Croatia, - Provision of informative and technical support to citizens, civil initiatives and economy development initiatives, - Campaigning and advocacy, - Monitoring of the work of courts of law and state administration bodies, - Organization of conferences, seminars, trainings, workshops, roundtables and public discussions, - Cooperation with relevant governmental and nongovernmental organizations in the Republic of Croatia as well as foreign and international nongovernmental organizations, and international organizations.
[Show full text]
BUDG/CONT Delegation Visit to Croatia 22 - 25 June 2010
BUDG/CONT Delegation visit to Croatia 22 - 25 June 2010 CONTENTS 1. Programme 2. Policy Department for Budgetary Affairs: The Economic and Political Situation in Croatia 3. Country Report, Economist Intelligence Unit 4. EC Conclusions on Croatia 5. European Parliament Resolution on the Progress report on Croatia 6. IPA 2009 Commission Decision with annex 7. Overview of EC Assistance to Croatia over the period 2001-2008 DRAFT PROGRAMME Joint Delegation of the Budgetary Control Committee and Budgets Committee to CROATIA 22-25 June 2010 Participants MEPs Luigi de Magistris - Head of delegation (CONT / ALDE) Jean Pierre Audy (CONT / EPP) Tamas Deutsch (CONT / (EPP) Goran Farm (BUDG / (S&D) Monica Luisa Macovei (CONT / EPP) Theodor Stolojan (BUDG / EPP) Derek Vaughn (CONT / S&D) Secretariat of the Committee on Budgetary Control: Mr Rudolfs Verdins (Administrator) Ms Sylvana Zammit (Assistant) (Special GSM number for the days 22-25 June 2010: +32 475-75 46 68) Secretariat of the Committee on Budgets: Lucia Cojocaru (Administrator) Political group advisors Jonas Kraft (EPP) Maggie Coulthard (S&D) Dominykas Mordas (ALDE) Interpreters (Active: EN, IT, HR - Passive: FR) Fusco Maria Antonietta (IT) (Team Leader) Varesco Enrico (FR, EN) Mance Natasa (EN) Levak Potrebica Tamara (EN, HR) Maras Marija (EN, HR) Hobbs James (IT) Collins Mani Anna (FR, IT) Members' Assistants Emilie Apell (assistant to Mr Farm S&D) Ana Brinza (assistant to Mr Stolojan EPP) EC Delegation in Zagreb: Mr Paul Vandoren Head of Delegation [email protected] Mr Sandro Ciganovic [email protected] Accommodation and transport in Croatia/Zagreb: Hotel Regent Esplanade Mihanoviceva 1, 10000 Zagreb Croatia Telephone: +385-(0)1-45 66 666 Fax: +385 1 45 66050 The delegation will have a bus at its disposal in Zagreb during meeting days.
[Show full text]
Fiscal Austerity in Croatia
INTERNATIONAL POLICY ANALYSIS No More Buying Time: Fiscal Austerity in Croatia VELIMIR ŠONJE September 2012 n In the initial phase of the crisis (2008–2010) the HDZ-led centre-right government allowed a wider fiscal deficit and strong growth in public debt, although they cut public infrastructure programmes and introduced new taxes. The idea was to buy time in order not to cut public sector wages, subsidies and transfers. This fiscal strat- egy proved to be wrong as GDP recorded one of the sharpest contractions in Europe in this period. n The new SDP-led centre-left government that took office in January 2012 faced two real threats: exploding public debt and a deterioration in credit ratings. In order to cope with these threats, the new government initiated stronger fiscal adjustment on the expenditure side. n The »austerity vs. growth« debate does not seem to be a good intellectual frame- work for thinking about policies in the case of Croatia, as postponing austerity re- quires finding someone to finance the deficit at low interest rates. That may be impossible for the time being, so some degree of austerity seems to be a necessity in Croatia. VELIMIR ŠONJE | NO MORE BUYING TIME: FISCAL AUSTERITY IN CROATIA Introduction est rates, postponement of fiscal adjustment may lead to a vicious circle of ever growing interest rates. It is easy to find reasons for postponing fiscal austerity. One may fear the weakening of the welfare state. One In countries with such characteristics, governments may argue that fiscal multipliers in a recession are high, have to show fiscal prudence earlier than in the most so spending cuts may deepen the recession (IMF 2012).
[Show full text]
Regierungsbildung in Kroatien – Kontinuität Und Reformagenda
August 2020 Auslandsbüro Kroatien und Slowenien Regierungsbildung in Kroatien – Kontinuität und Reformagenda Nach einem deutlichen Sieg bei den Parlamentswahlen Anfang Juli 2020 bewerkstelligten die HDZ und ihr Parteichef Andrej Plenkovic eine zügige Regierungsbildung. Die bevorstehenden Herausforderungen sind enorm, die Erwartungen der Bürger vielleicht noch höher. Holger Haibach, Marko Prusina, Luka Blaić Nach den Parlamentswahlen, bei denen die EVP-Partnerpartei HDZ 66 Parlamentssitze erhielt, kündigte Parteichef Plenkovic umfassende Reformen an. Bereits zweieinhalb Wochen nach den Wahlen bekam Kroatien eine neue Regierung. Von den 151 Parlamentariern der zehnten Legislaturperiode des kroatischen Parlaments stimmten 76 Mandatsträger für Ministerpräsident Andrej Plenkovic. 59 Abgeordnete stimmten gegen ihn. Zum wichtigsten Koalitionspartner der HDZ wurden die acht Abgeordneten der Minderheiten. Die Reformziele der Regierung Plenkovic sind ambitioniert, vor allem deshalb, weil das Ausmaß der wirtschaftlichen Folgen der Pandemie noch immer ungewiss ist. Bildung der Regierung momentan ein Wachstum von 7,5 Prozent für Kroatien im Jahr 2021. Ein wichtiger Bestandteil Staatspräsident Zoran Milanovic übertrug am 16. des zukünftigen wirtschaftlichen Aufschwungs Juli 2020 dem amtierenden Ministerpräsident könnten dabei zusätzliche europäische Mittel Andrej Plenkovic das Mandat für die Bildung einer sein. neuen Regierung. Neben den acht Abgeordneten der Minderheiten bekam die HDZ auch die Die Regierung Plenkovic hat großen Wert darauf Unterstützung der liberalen Parteien HNS (1) und gelegt, die Opposition in die Bewältigung der NS Reformisti (1). Alle diese Koalitionspartner kommenden Herausforderungen hatten die HDZ auch in der vergangenen miteinzubeziehen. In den folgenden Jahren wird Legislaturperiode zeitweilig unterstützt. Kroatien maßgebliche politische Entscheidungen treffen müssen, nicht zuletzt über den Beitritt zur Die Regierung hat fünf Prioritäten für die Eurozone.
[Show full text]
UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Presence and Impotence
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Presence and Impotence: The perils of guaranteed descriptive representation A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Geoffrey Allen Committee in charge: Professor Heather Stoll, Chair Professor Amit Ahuja Professor Neil Narang September 2018 The dissertation of Geoffrey Allen is approved. _____________________________________________ Neil Narang _____________________________________________ Amit Ahuja _____________________________________________ Heather Stoll, Committee Chair September 2018 Presence and Impotence: The perils of guaranteed descriptive representation Copyright © 2018 by Geoffrey Allen iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are so many individuals and groups without which I would never have been able to complete this project. First, I would like to acknowledge my committee members Heather Stoll, Amit Ahuja and Neil Narang. Without their guidance and mentorship, this project would have floundered very early on. I was not always the model student, but you all struck the perfect balance of stringency and support that I needed to complete this project. I hope you all know how much I appreciate the years of assistance. I would also like to thank the faculty and staff of the Department of Political Science, my home of seven years. The amount of support I received from everyone was of unquantifiable importance. I would like to give particular thanks to Cynthia Kaplan, Kathleen Bruhn, Matto Mildenberger and Leah Stokes, who at different times all gave me the nudge I needed to think about myself and my project in different ways. Honestly, the entire department has been instrumental in completing this project, and I thank you all. This project benefitted from financial support from the UCSB Affiliates as well as the Graduate Division.
[Show full text]
Financing the 2009 – 2010 Presidential Elections in Croatia: Conflicting Interpretations of Campaign Finance Laws**
Zbornik PFZ, 61, (1) 41-64 (2011) 41 FinAnCing tHe 2009 – 2010 PReSidentiAL eLeCtionS in CRoAtiA: ConFLiCting inteRPRetAtionS oF CAmPAign FinAnCe LAWS** Professor Robert Podolnjak, Ph. D.* UDK: 342.849.2(497.5) 324.511(497.5) Izvorni znanstveni rad Primljeno: kolovoz 2010. The author discusses two fundamental problems relating to the funding of election campaigns in the recent presidential election in Croatia. The first pro- blem derives from the incongruence of two election campaign financing acts in Croatia – the 2004 Act on Financing the Election Campaign for the Election of the President of the Republic of Croatia and the 2007 Act on the Financing of Political Parties, Independent Lists and Candidates. The latter and the more important problem in funding the latest presidential election campaign was that the competent state bodies, authorized to implement the regulations dealing with the funding of the election campaign, were deeply divided on the question which of the two acts is relevant in regulating specific issues. The differences in the way the State Electoral Commission, the Constitutional Court, the State Audit Office and the Ministry of Administration interpreted legal regulations precluded the effective sanctioning of offences in the latest presidential election campaign in Croatia. Key words: presidential elections, Croatia, funding of the election campaign According to the final report of the OSCE mission in Croatia, the latest pre- sidential elections in Croatia (first round in December 2009 and run-off in Ja- nuary 2010), generally speaking, fulfilled the international electoral standards. However, one of the strongest reservations expressed was about the regulation of the electoral campaign financing.
[Show full text]
Croatian Helsinki Committee for Human Rights
CROATIAN HELSINKI COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Zagreb, December 15, 2003 MEDIA AND ELECTIONS 2003 ANALYSIS OF DAILY NEWSPAPERS Alija Hodžic The Media and Elections 2003 monitoring project covered the items in daily newspapers, which directly or indirectly related to the activities of the relevant actors of political life in Croatia. The method used in the research was the analysis of the content. The analysis included items, which were published in six daily newspapers (Vjesnik, Vecernji list, Jutarnji list, Slobodna Dalmacija, Novi list and Glas Slavonije) in the period since October 12until November 22, 2003. First three newspapers belong to the category of national newspapers, while other three belong to the category of regional newspapers. Two daily newspapers are majority state-owned (Vjesnik and Slobodna Dalmacija) and two are owned by domestic (mostly small) stock owners (Novi list and Glas Slavonije), while one is half-owned by domestic and foreign owners (Jutarnji list, which is the only new established daily after 1990), and one is majority- owned by foreigners. The monitored period, in spite of the fact that it represents the continuous flow, has not been analysed as a unique entity. It was divided in two separate entities: the period, which includes time of the official pre-electoral campaign (which started on November 6) and the period prior to the beginning of the official campaign (October 12 until November 5). The reasons for such division are found in the basic differences between these two periods. Specifically in the period of the official pre-electoral campaign, the election candidates were well known (political parties, coalitions, independent candidates, as well as individuals).
[Show full text]
18EN.Doc PE 423.951
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2004 2009 Committee on Foreign Affairs ACTIVITY REPORT (6th Legislature: 2004 – 2009) ----------------------- 30 April 2009 AFET Secretariat CM 782818EN.doc PE 423.951 CM 782818EN.doc PE 423.951 FOREWORD BY JACEK SARYUSZ-WOLSKI, CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS (2007 – 2009) The report before you represents the culmination of the past five years (2004 – 2009) of intensive and productive activity by the Committee on Foreign Affairs. Simply looked at in terms of 'raw' statistics, the Committee's work in the course of the 6th legislature has been pretty impressive by any standards: in addition to our regular committee meetings held at least twice-monthly, we have held 72 extraordinary meetings to respond to crisis situations and issues, and prepared, debated and adopted a total of 259 reports, opinions and resolutions which were then voted on in plenary. The Committee was addressed a total of 397 times by visiting speakers from outside the EU and from within, including 176 exchanges with the Commission and the Council, notably with the High Representative for CFSP, Javier Solana (10 times), Commissioners Rehn (17 times) and Ferrero-Waldner (15 times), and all 20 EU Special Representatives over the 5-year period. Regular briefings by the Council Presidency-in-office post-GAERC or on Presidency priorities (63), as well as preparatory visits by AFET's Enlarged Bureau to the Member State holding the forthcoming Presidency (8), meetings of the Conference of Foreign Affairs Committee Chairmen (COFACC) held in the Presidency country (9), and regular bilateral meetings in Brussels between AFET and representatives of the foreign affairs and defence committees of national parliaments (6), have strengthened the Committee's contacts and involvement with each Presidency and fostered its involvement in CFSP issues.
[Show full text]