DOCSLIB.ORG

Shadow Report on the Implementation of the Framework Convention for Protection of National Minorities in the Republic of Croatia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Center for Peace, Legal Advice and Psychosocial Assistance SHADOW REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Third monitoring cycle 2004 – 2010 February 2010 0 CONTENT I Information on the Center for Peace, Legal Advice and Psychosocial Assistance 2 II Introductory Remarks on the Shadow Report 3 III Application of the Convention Article by Article 6 Article 3 6 Article 4 8 Article 5 15 Article 6 16 Article 7 19 Article 8 19 Article 9 20 Articles 10 and 11 23 Articles 12, 13 and 14 28 Article 15 30 Article 16 39 IV Action Plan of the Republic of Croatia for the Implementation of the Constitutional Law on the Rights of National Minorities, June 2008 40 V Concluding Remarks and Recommendations 42 1 I Information on the Center for Peace, Legal Advice and Psychosocial Assistance – Vukovar Center for Peace, Legal Advice and Psychosocial Assistance is local, nongovernmental, non-political, non-partisan, nonprofit, humanitarian association that works on protection and promotion of human rights, development of democracy and interethnic relations in the Republic of Croatia. The Center was established on and works since 1 August 1996. Main activities of the Center: - Provision of free legal advices and free legal aid, - Reporting on and analyzing human rights situation, with special attention paid to the rights of refugees, displaced persons and persons belonging to national minorities in the Republic of Croatia, - Provision of informative and technical support to citizens, civil initiatives and economy development initiatives, - Campaigning and advocacy, - Monitoring of the work of courts of law and state administration bodies, - Organization of conferences, seminars, trainings, workshops, roundtables and public discussions, - Cooperation with relevant governmental and nongovernmental organizations in the Republic of Croatia as well as foreign and international nongovernmental organizations, and international organizations. Beneficiaries of the Center’s services are all citizens regardless of their gender, culture, mental or physical abilities, ethnicity or religion, etc. The Center is a founder and the member of the Coalition for Promotion and Protection of Human Rights in the Republic of Croatia. Contact details: Center for Peace, Legal Advice and Psychosocial Assistance Address: Fra.Antuna Tomaševi ća 32, 32 000 Vukovar, Republic of Croatia Phone: +385 (0)32 413 319; +385 (0)32 413 317 Fax: +385 (0)32 413 319; +385 (0)32 413 317 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.center4peace.org Contact person: Ankica Miki ć, the President 2 II Introductory Remarks on the Shadow Report The Government of the Republic of Croatia produced their 3 rd Report on the implementation of the Framework Convention for Protection of National Minorities in June 2009. The Report was produced within the 3 rd cycle of monitoring of the implementation of the Framework Convention in the Republic of Croatia. The Government submitted their report to the Secretary General, that is, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe in accordance with the obligation set by the Article 25 of the Convention. In July 2004, within the 2 nd monitoring cycle, the Center for Peace – Vukovar in cooperation with the Community of Serbs – Rijeka produced the Shadow Report on the implementation of the Framework Convention in the Republic of Croatia for the period 1999 – 2004. This Shadow Report, covering the period 2004 – 2010, the Center for Peace produced within the 3 rd cycle of monitoring of the implementation of the Framework Convention in the Republic of Croatia. The Report is a compilation of information collected from alternative, nongovernmental sources relevant for monitoring the implementation of the Framework Convention. However, the Report also points at particular information from relevant documents of the Government of the Republic of Croatia. This Shadow Report is not a comprehensive source of information on the situation of persons belonging to national minorities. It does not elaborate on all information significant to each national minority in the Republic of Croatia. The Report does not contain, that is, does not repeat relevant information and details included in the Report of the Government of the Republic of Croatia. That is why this Shadow Report should be considered along with the 3 rd Report on the implementation of the Framework Convention for Protection of National Minorities. The Shadow Report is mostly focused on examination of issues that, according to the opinion and findings of the Center, deserve more attention. Initial preparations for the production of this report started in 2005. During this reporting period, the Center for Peace, continuously, through relevant projects, programs, public discussions, situation analysis and production of publications, collected relevant information and communicated with representatives of different national minorities in the Republic of 3 Croatia. Details on the activities of the Center for Peace in period 2005 – 2010 are available at: www.center4peace.org Structure of the Shadow Report, that is, the order of the information presented, are generally following the structure of the content and the order of information of the 2 nd Opinion on Croatia accepted by the Advisory Committee for Framework Convention on 1 October 2004. The Center for Peace is grateful to all organizations and individuals who contributed to better review of the situation of the rights of persons belonging to national minorities and production of this report by answering to and participating in the implementation of the Center’s activities. The Center gratefully acknowledges the contribution of following individuals and organizations who sent their written responses used for the production of this Shadow Report: Darinka Janjanin, member of the Council of Serb National Minority of the City of Rijeka; Coordination of Councils and Representatives of Czech National Minority in the Republic of Croatia; Coalition for Promotion and Protection of Human Rights; Miladin Jakovljevic, member of the Council of Serb National Minority of the City of Pakrac and Pozesko-Slavonian County; Center for Support and Development of Civil Society ,,Delfin'' from Pakrac; and Joint Council of Municipalities – Vukovar. In its report, in relation to specific issues and situation of persons belonging to Roma national minority, the Center suggests to review the Shadow Report produced by representatives of Roma associations and Center for Implementation of European Union Integration that has been produced within the 3 rd cycle of monitoring of the implementation of the Framework Convention in the Republic of Croatia. Namely, in the end of 2009 and the beginning of 2010, within a project, the Center maintained regular contacts and cooperated with number of Roma associations’ representatives and was familiar with their activities on the production of special alternative report. This report was produced within regional partnership program “Enhancement of the inclusion of vulnerable groups in Southeast Europe: Minority Rights Advocacy in Processes of European Union Integration”. The program is financed by UK DIFID and implemented by Minority Rights Group International, London, Great Britain, in cooperation with their local partners from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Kosovo. 4 Content of this Shadow Report does not necessarily and in every detail present the collective view of all who contributed to its production. 5 III Application of the Convention Article by Article Article 3 1. Every person belonging to a national minority shall have the right freely to choose to be treated or not to be treated as such and no disadvantage shall result from this choice or from the exercise of the rights which are connected to that choice. 2. Persons belonging to national minorities may exercise the rights and enjoy the freedoms flowing from the principles enshrined in the present framework Convention individually as well as in community with others. (1.) Preamble of the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia explicitly lists 10 national minorities (while further minorities come under “the others” category) has not been changed during the reporting period. However, the intention has been announced to re-include Bosniaks (at the time listed as Muslims)1 and Slovenians, the two minorities that were explicitly listed in the Preamble of the 1990 2 Constitution and were deleted from that list later, within constitutional changes planned to be introduced in 2010. Suggestions and initiatives to include Roma in the Preamble of the Constitution are coming from certain political circles and representatives of Roma associations. 3 Although perhaps these changes might be of just symbolic nature, they could positively affect additional identity affirmation of the persons belonging to the above national minorities in the Republic of Croatia. (2.) Exercise of the rights guaranteed by the Constitutional Law on the Rights of National Minorities does not refer to the persons who are not Croatian citizens. At the same time, certain number of Serbs, Roma and Bosniaks, a longtime residents of the Republic of Croatia, has difficulties in exercising rights to Croatian citizenship thus the exercise of economic, social and political rights guaranteed to Croatian citizens. These persons are discriminated in comparison to non-citizens of Croatian origins in relation to the acquirement of
Recommended publications
  • Analiza 2.Pdf

    Analiza 2.Pdf

    GAP ANALYSIS Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABBREVIATIONS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1.0 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS 7 1.1 Demographics on national minorities in the Republic of Croatia 7 1.2 Legal and institutional framework protecting the national minorities in 8 the RoC 1.3 Councils of National Minorities 9 1.4 Support to the Councils of National Minorities in Areas of Special State 12 Concern (the Project) 2.0 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY 13 2.1 Phase I – initial data collection 13 2.2 Phase II – data collection 13 2.3 Defined sample of stakeholders within the Phase II 14 2.3.1 Local and regional authorities 14 2.3.2 Councils of National Minorities 15 2.3.3 Co-ordinations of Councils of National Minorities 18 2.4 Approach used in development of the GAP Analysis 19 2.5 Approach used for preparing the recommendations for improving the 19 effectiveness of the LCNMs 3.0 GAP ANALYSIS RESULTS 20 3.1 Evaluation of the LCNM capacities and performed activities 20 3.1.1 The LCNM self-perception of the membership capacities and the 20 structure 3.1.2 The LCNM self-perception of financial and logistical capacities 22 3.1.3 The LCNM self-perception of performed work 24 3.1.4 Evaluation by the local authorities on the LCNM working capacities 25 3.2 Evaluation of the local authorities work pertaining to the LCNMs 26 3.2.1 Local authorities’ self-perception of the work pertaining to the LCNMs 26 3.2.2 The LCNM evaluation of their co-operation with local authorities 27 3.3 Evaluation of the perception of national minorities and the LCNMs by 29 the
  • News in Brief 12 July

    News in Brief 12 July

    Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe OSCE Mission to Croatia News in brief 12 July – 25 July 2006 Prime Minister Sanader visits Serbia On 21 July, Croatian Prime Minister Ivo Sanader paid his second official visit to Serbia, further intensifying bilateral relations between the two countries. Prime Minister Sanader made his first visit to Belgrade in November 2004, followed by a reciprocal visit to Zagreb by Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Koštunica in November 2005. Prior to their meeting in Belgrade the two Prime Ministers officially opened the newly renovated border crossing between Croatia and Serbia in Bajakovo, Eastern Croatia. At the ceremony attended by representatives of both governments and the diplomatic corps from Zagreb and Belgrade, the Croatian Premier said that "today we are opening the future of new relations between our two countries." Echoing this sentiment, Prime Minister Koštunica added that both the "Serbian and Croatian governments will work to heal wounds from the past and build a new future for the two states in a united Europe". Later, following talks in Belgrade, both Prime Ministers declared that Serbia and Croatia have a joint objective, to join the European Union, and that strong bilateral relations between the two countries should be the foundation of political security in the region. Prime Minister Sanader commended the efforts both governments had made towards improving the position of minorities in line with the bilateral agreement on minority protection signed between the two countries in November 2004. He went on to stress his cabinet’s wish to see the Serb minority fully integrated into Croatian society.
  • Framing Croatia's Politics of Memory and Identity

    Framing Croatia's Politics of Memory and Identity

    Workshop: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER WORKSHOP: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER Author: Taylor A. McConnell, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh Title: “KRVatska”, “Branitelji”, “Žrtve”: (Re-)framing Croatia’s politics of memory and identity Date: 3 April 2018 Workshop: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER “KRVatska”, “Branitelji”, “Žrtve”: (Re-)framing Croatia’s politics of memory and identity Taylor McConnell, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh Web: taylormcconnell.com | Twitter: @TMcConnell_SSPS | E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This paper explores the development of Croatian memory politics and the construction of a new Croatian identity in the aftermath of the 1990s war for independence. Using the public “face” of memory – monuments, museums and commemorations – I contend that Croatia’s narrative of self and self- sacrifice (hence “KRVatska” – a portmanteau of “blood/krv” and “Croatia/Hrvatska”) is divided between praising “defenders”/“branitelji”, selectively remembering its victims/“žrtve”, and silencing the Serb minority. While this divide is partially dependent on geography and the various ways the Croatian War for Independence came to an end in Dalmatia and Slavonia, the “defender” narrative remains preeminent. As well, I discuss the division of Croatian civil society, particularly between veterans’ associations and regional minority bodies, which continues to disrupt amicable relations among the Yugoslav successor states and places Croatia in a generally undesired but unshakable space between “Europe” and the Balkans. 1 Workshop: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................................
  • Članci Republika Srpska Krajina and the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination*

    Članci Republika Srpska Krajina and the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination*

    ČLANCI PETER RADAN, PhD, Professor of Law Macquarie University, Sydney Sydney, New South Wels, 2109, Australia [email protected] UDK: 341.231 originalan naučni rad 323.1(497.5) primljeno: 17. maj 2017. prihvaćeno: 11. oktobar 2017. DOI: 10.29362/IST20VEKA.2018.1.RAD.9-34 REPUBLIKA SRPSKA KRAJINA AND THE RIGHT * OF PEOPLES TO SELF-DETERMINATION ABSTRACT: In Part I of this article author details the claims to inde- pendent statehood of Croatia and Krajina based upon the right of peoples to self-determination in the context of the emergence of nationalism as a powerful political force in Yugoslavia in the early 1990s. He also details the response of the international community to the crisis which these irreconcilable claims gave rise to. In Part II author explores the reasons why the secession of Croatia suc- ceeded and the secession of Krajina failed. Finally, the ramifications of Croa- tia’s and Krajina’s competing claims to statehood for the right of peoples to self-determination are discussed in the Conclusion. KEYWORDS: Republika Srpska Krajina, The break-up of Yugoslavia, War in Croatia 1991–1995, International Law, Self-determination, Secession, Inter-ethnic relations, National Minorities, Serbs in Croatia, Nationalism Introduction On 9 November 1989 the Berlin Wall came down. More than any other, this event of that tumultuous year symbolised the end of the Cold War and ush- ered in what Allen Buchanan has called ‘the age of secession’.1 The usual justi- fication for secessionist demands was the right of peoples to self-determination. One of the means by which this right is realised is by ‘the establishment of a sovereign and independent state’.2 The critical question for self-determination relates to the meaning of ‘peoples’.
  • BUDG/CONT Delegation Visit to Croatia 22 - 25 June 2010

    BUDG/CONT Delegation Visit to Croatia 22 - 25 June 2010

    BUDG/CONT Delegation visit to Croatia 22 - 25 June 2010 CONTENTS 1. Programme 2. Policy Department for Budgetary Affairs: The Economic and Political Situation in Croatia 3. Country Report, Economist Intelligence Unit 4. EC Conclusions on Croatia 5. European Parliament Resolution on the Progress report on Croatia 6. IPA 2009 Commission Decision with annex 7. Overview of EC Assistance to Croatia over the period 2001-2008 DRAFT PROGRAMME Joint Delegation of the Budgetary Control Committee and Budgets Committee to CROATIA 22-25 June 2010 Participants MEPs Luigi de Magistris - Head of delegation (CONT / ALDE) Jean Pierre Audy (CONT / EPP) Tamas Deutsch (CONT / (EPP) Goran Farm (BUDG / (S&D) Monica Luisa Macovei (CONT / EPP) Theodor Stolojan (BUDG / EPP) Derek Vaughn (CONT / S&D) Secretariat of the Committee on Budgetary Control: Mr Rudolfs Verdins (Administrator) Ms Sylvana Zammit (Assistant) (Special GSM number for the days 22-25 June 2010: +32 475-75 46 68) Secretariat of the Committee on Budgets: Lucia Cojocaru (Administrator) Political group advisors Jonas Kraft (EPP) Maggie Coulthard (S&D) Dominykas Mordas (ALDE) Interpreters (Active: EN, IT, HR - Passive: FR) Fusco Maria Antonietta (IT) (Team Leader) Varesco Enrico (FR, EN) Mance Natasa (EN) Levak Potrebica Tamara (EN, HR) Maras Marija (EN, HR) Hobbs James (IT) Collins Mani Anna (FR, IT) Members' Assistants Emilie Apell (assistant to Mr Farm S&D) Ana Brinza (assistant to Mr Stolojan EPP) EC Delegation in Zagreb: Mr Paul Vandoren Head of Delegation [email protected] Mr Sandro Ciganovic [email protected] Accommodation and transport in Croatia/Zagreb: Hotel Regent Esplanade Mihanoviceva 1, 10000 Zagreb Croatia Telephone: +385-(0)1-45 66 666 Fax: +385 1 45 66050 The delegation will have a bus at its disposal in Zagreb during meeting days.
  • Competition Between Minority Ethnic Parties in Post-Conflict Countries

    Competition Between Minority Ethnic Parties in Post-Conflict Countries

    Competition Between Minority Ethnic Parties in Post-conflict Countries: Performance of Minority Parties in Croatia and Macedonia by Dane Taleski Submitted to Central European University Department of Political Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Supervisor: András Bozóki Budapest, September 2014 1 ABSTRACT Academic and policy studies argue that an inclusive approach is needed for sustainable peacebuilding. This justifies the inclusion of former combatants into political parties, but some argue that it can have negative consequences for democratization. Institutional engineering is proposed to forge cross-cutting parties; however it is puzzling to find that parties from rebels often dominate in the post-conflict period. To address this puzzle I look at minority ethnic parties in post-conflict Croatia and Macedonia. SDSS dominates the competition between Serb parties in Croatia and DUI dominates between Albanian parties in Macedonia. To answer why this is so, I first look at the process of their formation and functioning and second I compared them to other minority parties. Despite the common history in Yugoslavia, the inter-ethnic conflicts, the post-conflict conditions and institutional environments for minority politics were very different in Croatia and Macedonia. My level of analysis is the competition between minority parties in each country. Because of the similar outcomes, under varying conditions, I consider that the finding in one country control for the other. Using process tracing I analyzed data from 78 interviews, party content, media and archival sources. The findings were corroborated with quantitative analysis of electoral data from national and sub- national elections in the entire post-conflict period.
  • ISSN 1450-5460 UDK 32 No. 2/2012 Year IV Vol. 6. Institute for Political Studies 1

    ISSN 1450-5460 UDK 32 No. 2/2012 Year IV Vol. 6. Institute for Political Studies 1

    Zoran Stoiljković Filip Škiljan Ljubiša Despotović Miroslav Brkić Dragana Stanković Miroslava Filipović Višnja Stančić ISSN 1450-5460 UDK 32 No. 2/2012 Year IV Vol. 6. Institute for Political Studies 1 ISSN 1450-5460 U DK N o. 1-2/2010 II Vol. 2 Serbian Political Thought ISSN 1450-5460 UDK 32 No. 2/2012 Year IV Vol. 6 Serbian Political Thought is published two times a year Serbian Political Thought was founded in 1996 and publishing was renewed in 2010. Publisher Institute for Political Studies Svetozara Markovića 36, Belgrade, Telephone +381 11 33 49 204, +381 11 30 39 380 www.sptips.rs www.ipsbgd.edu.rs e-mail: [email protected] Director Živojin Đurić Editor in Chief Đorđe Stojanović Deputy Editor Dejana Vukčević Foreign Editorial Board Mamoru Sadakata, Dean/Professor, Graduate School of Law, Nagoya University, Nagoya Iver B. Neumann, Research Director, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, Oslo Dumitru Batar, Dean/Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, University “Lucian Blaga” of Sibiu Anastasia Mitrofanova, Professor, Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow; Research Director, Center for Euro-Atlantic Studies, Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Foreign Affairs Ministry, Moscow Goran Kovacic, Associated Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana Domestic Editorial Board Milan Jovanović, Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Belgrade Dušan Pavlović, Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Belgrade Ljubiša Despotović, Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade Živojin Đurić, Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade Sanja Šuljagić, Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade Petar Matić, Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade Višnja Stančić, Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade Dušan Gujaničić, Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade Bojan Kiculović, Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade Secretary of the Journal Mladen Lišanin Translators Ana Matić Andrijana Stamenković Milica Bjelobaba Graphic Designer Miroslava Karajanković Printed by ESELOGE d.o.o.
  • The Kosovo Serbs

    The Kosovo Serbs

    REPORT Small arms and security in South Eastern Europe Bonn International Center for Conversion, Friedrich Naumann Foundation and Saferworld The Kosovo Serbs: An ethnic minority between collaboration and defiance Anna Matveeva and Wolf-Christian Paes June 2003 The Kosovo Serbs: An ethnic minority between collaboration and defiance Anna Matveeva and Wolf-Christian Paes BONN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CONVERSION, FRIEDRICH NAUMANN FOUNDATION AND SAFERWORLD JUNE 2003 Acknowledgements This report was produced as part of Saferworld’s small arms project in South Eastern Europe. Saferworld is grateful to the UK Government for funding their small armsproject. Further project funding was provided by the Friedrich-Naumann-Foundation. The authors would like to thank Duncan Hiscock and Chrissie Hirst for editing the report and Marc v. Boemken, Luitgard Hammerer,Yves del Monaco and Simon Rynn for their advice and individual contributions. All photographs used were taken by Wolf-Christian Paes. Contents Serb communities in Kosovo 4 Acronyms 5 Foreword 6 Preface 8 1 Introduction 10 2 History of the conflict 12 3 On a life-support machine: The situation of the 21 Kosovo Serbs 4 Kosovo Serb politics 27 5 Guns and security 38 6 International policies towards Kosovo 43 7 Options for the future of Kosovo 47 Bibliography 50 Appendix 1: United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 52 (1999) Serb communities in Kosovo Nis River Ibar Novi Pazar Kursumlija Leposavic SERBIA River Ibar Potok Zveçan Podujevo MONTENEGRO Mitrovica Medveda Rozaj Vucitrn Istok Srbica Obilic
  • Ovdje, Vi Ste Najgori Šljam.”10 to Se Dogodilo Nakon Posjeta Potpredsjednika Vlade Borisa Miloševića I Predsjednika SDSS-A Milo- Rada Pupovca Vukovaru

    Ovdje, Vi Ste Najgori Šljam.”10 to Se Dogodilo Nakon Posjeta Potpredsjednika Vlade Borisa Miloševića I Predsjednika SDSS-A Milo- Rada Pupovca Vukovaru

    SNV Bulletin #20 Historijski revizionizam, govor mržnje i nasilje prema Srbima u 2020. / SNV Bulletin #20 Impressum Bulletin #20: Historijski revizionizam, govor mržnje i nasilje prema Srbima u 2020. Izdavač / Srpsko narodno vijeće zA IZDAVAČA / Milorad Pupovac urednik / Saša Milošević Autor / Tihomir Ponoš istraživači / Tihomir Ponoš i Nikola Vukobratović prijevod / Riječ i savjet dizajn / Igor Stanišljević, Parabureau Tisak / IT Graf Tiraža / 800 ISSN / 1849-7314 ISBN / 978-9537442-56-9 CIP zapis je dostupan u računalnome katalogu Nacionalne i sveučilišne knjižnice u Zagrebu pod brojem 001094522. podrška / Ured za ljudska prava i prava nacionalnih manjina VRH Zagreb, mart 2021. SNV Bulletin #20 Historijski revizionizam, govor mržnje i nasilje prema Srbima u 2020. / Historijski revizionizam, govor mržnje i nasilje prema Srbima u 2020. / 3 Uvod Prve nedjelje u srpnju održani su parlamentarni izbori. Na tim izborima svoje je kandidate istaknula i Samostalna demokratska srpska stranka (SDSS). Pažnju javnosti privukla je kampanja koju je SDSS vodio pod sloganom “budi ono što jesi, poštuj ono što nisi”, konkretno tri spota izašla u sklopu te kampanje. U prvome ugostitelji pripremaju terasu restorana za vjenčanje, a konobarica na ulaz lijepi natpis na kojem piše da se mole gosti da ne pjevaju ustaške pjesme jer su među uzvanicima i Srbi. Drugi je privukao najviše pažnje javnosti i nazvan je “Pupi je kriv za sve”. Protagonist spota predsjednik je SDSS-a Milorad Pupovac, a u autoironičnom i duhovitom spotu njega se doista proglašava krivim za sve: od rata devedesetih godina pa do planiranja čipiranja stanovništva s Billom Gatesom i pripreme drugog vala korone u Hrvatskoj. Treći spot posvećen je izgradnji malena drvenog mosta na Baniji koji je olakšao život jednoj srpskoj obitelji, a snimljen je na mjestu gdje je most nekada postojao.
  • Commemorations of the Victory and of the Victims of Operation

    Commemorations of the Victory and of the Victims of Operation

    COMMEMORATIONS OF THE VICTORY AND OF THE VICTIMS OF OPERATION STORM IN CROATIA AND SERBIA RECONCILIATION AND OFFICIAL MEMORY POLITICS: RECONCILIATION AND OFFICIAL MEMORY POLITICS: COMMEMORATIONS OF THE VICTORY AND OF THE VICTIMS OF OPERATION STORM IN CROATIA AND SERBIA October 2020 RECOM Reconciliation Network RECONCILIATION AND OFFICIAL MEMORY POLITICS: COMMEMORATIONS OF THE VICTORY AND OF THE VICTIMS OF OPERATION STORM IN CROATIA AND SERBIA PUBLISHER: RECOM Reconciliation Network EDITOR: Dr. Jelena Đureinović AUTHORS: Dr. Jelena Đureinović Nataša Kandić Sven Milekić Dr. Vjeran Pavlaković DESIGN: Todor Cvetković TABLE OF CONTENTS The Recognition of Victims is the Foundation of Reconciliation 4 The Commemoration of Operation Storm in Croatia in 2020 5 The Position of Operation Storm in the Official Politics of Memory and the Culture of Remembrance in Croatia 9 The Commemoration of Operation Storm in 2020 and its Position in the Official Memory Politics in Serbia 12 Conclusion 16 3 RECOM Reconciliation Network THE RECOGNITION OF VICTIMS IS THE FOUNDATION OF RECONCILIATION Nataša Kandić As in previous years, the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the “Storm” military and police operation was for Croatia the celebration of a war victory and of the recovery of sovereignty in the whole state territory. Contrary to previous years, extremists were no longer part of the official programme, nor did they have access to the celebration. A novelty was the new messages. The just formed government, led by the previous but significantly stronger prime minister, opened a conversation about the differences in the interpretation of Operation Storm, and advocated the acknowledgement of the perspective of others.
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Presence and Impotence

    UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Presence and Impotence

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Presence and Impotence: The perils of guaranteed descriptive representation A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Geoffrey Allen Committee in charge: Professor Heather Stoll, Chair Professor Amit Ahuja Professor Neil Narang September 2018 The dissertation of Geoffrey Allen is approved. _____________________________________________ Neil Narang _____________________________________________ Amit Ahuja _____________________________________________ Heather Stoll, Committee Chair September 2018 Presence and Impotence: The perils of guaranteed descriptive representation Copyright © 2018 by Geoffrey Allen iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are so many individuals and groups without which I would never have been able to complete this project. First, I would like to acknowledge my committee members Heather Stoll, Amit Ahuja and Neil Narang. Without their guidance and mentorship, this project would have floundered very early on. I was not always the model student, but you all struck the perfect balance of stringency and support that I needed to complete this project. I hope you all know how much I appreciate the years of assistance. I would also like to thank the faculty and staff of the Department of Political Science, my home of seven years. The amount of support I received from everyone was of unquantifiable importance. I would like to give particular thanks to Cynthia Kaplan, Kathleen Bruhn, Matto Mildenberger and Leah Stokes, who at different times all gave me the nudge I needed to think about myself and my project in different ways. Honestly, the entire department has been instrumental in completing this project, and I thank you all. This project benefitted from financial support from the UCSB Affiliates as well as the Graduate Division.
  • D E C I S I O N

    D E C I S I O N

    THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA No.: U-I-3786/2010 U-I-3553/2011 Zagreb, 29 June 2011 The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia, composed of Jasna Omejec, President of the Court, and Judges Mato Arlović, Marko Babić, Snježana Bagić, Slavica Banić, Mario Jelušić, Ivan Matija, Antun Palarić, Aldo Radolović, Duška Šarin and Miroslav Šeparović, deciding on proposals to institute proceedings to review the conformity of a law with the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia (Narodne novine nos. 56/90, 135/97, 113/00, 28/01, 76/10), at its session held on 29 June 2011 rendered the following D E C I S I O N I. Proceedings have been instituted to review the conformity with the Constitution of Article 4 of the Constitutional Act on Amendments to the Constitutional Act on the Rights of National Minorities (Narodne novine, no. 80/10), and - in paragraph 1 the new paragraphs 7 and 8 supplementing Article 33 of the Constitutional Act on the Rights of National Minorities (Narodne novine, nos. 155/02, 47/10 – decision and ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia no.: U-I-1029/2007 and others of 7 April 2010) are hereby repealed. II. This decision shall be published in Narodne novine. S t a t e m e n t o f r e a s o n s I. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT 1. The Serbian Democratic Forum, represented by Veljko Đakula, president of the Administrative Committee, and the Socialist Party of Croatia – SPC, represented by Milovan Bojčetić, president, submitted proposals for the Constitutional Court to institute proceedings to review the conformity with the Constitution of Article 4 para.