DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on the Work Activities for the Year of 2003

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

REPUBLIC OF CROATIA THE OMBUDSMAN REPORT ON THE WORK ACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR OF 2003 Zagreb, March 2004 1 SECTION ONE INTRODUCTORY REMARKS 1. The report on the work activities of the Ombudsman is a regular annual report that is submitted to the Croatian Parliament by the Ombudsman for the previous year. This is the seventh report that the Ombudsman, Mr. Ante Klarić, has submitted during his term in office. Each year in the governing bodies and at the plenary session of the Croatian Parliament there was an extensive discussion – not only regarding the Ombudsman’s annual report itself, but also regarding the evaluations he presented and general issues of promotion and protection of human rights in the Republic of Croatia. In lieu of the Report on the work activities for the year of 2003, the Croatian Parliament held an extensive discussion, after which by the majority of votes (74 in favor, 1 against and 2 abstaining) a conclusion was reached by which the Report on the work activities of the Ombudsman for the year of 2002 was taken note of. In accordance with the proposal of the Committee for Family, Youth and Sports, the following conclusions were reached (by the majority of votes; 48 in favor, 8 against and 26 abstaining): (1) The Government of the Republic of Croatia commits itself to - as soon as possible - review and improve the life conditions within departments of institutions for minors at which the freedom of movement in the Republic of Croatia is limited. (2) Within an appropriate amount of time it is necessary to ensure additional funding in order to enable efficient functioning of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Croatia. (3) The Government of the Republic of Croatia commits itself to make a statement regarding the proposal of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Croatia for the recognition of reimbursement rights to children of former political prisoners for those days that their parents spent in prison or jail. Compliant to the proposal of the HDZ Club of Representatives, by the majority of votes (73 in favor, 1 against and 3 abstaining), also reached was the conclusion according to which the Government of the Republic of Croatia commits itself to proposing additional funding within the Government budget for the year of 2004 towards the activities of the Ombudsman Office. 2 2. With regards to the problems that the Ombudsman has encountered during work for several years now, in April 2003 the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights of the Organization for European Security and Cooperation (ODIHR/OESS) and the OESS Mission to Croatia have engaged professor John Hucker, an independent professional, to prepare an analysis of the current legal and political circumstances that surround the institution of the Ombudsman in Croatia. The purpose of this analysis is to identify legal, financial or logistic limitations that affect the work of the Ombudsman, as well as the proposal of measures that are to be taken in order to reinforce the position of the institution. In the mentioned analysis, which is enclosed with this report in its entirety, the following was recommended: 1) The Government should review the current budget of the Ombudsman Office with the goal of increasing the funding to a higher level. This revision should be performed by an independent auditor, or in cooperation with one. The Ombudsman should be continually consulted with during each phase of the revision. The means that are to be allocated should be sufficient for the Ombudsman to establish presence at the largest centers outside of Zagreb and to strengthen analytical capacities. 2) The Ombudsman should secure the existence of strategic and operative plans that would serve as input for the revision of funding that is proposed in point 1 (It is not realistic to expect the Government to allocate a significant amount of new financial means without a clear explanation of the manner in which the means are to be spent). 3) The Government of the Republic of Croatia – with the help of the international community if necessary – should allocate the means for the support of a short-term (3 to 6 months) capacity building program for the Ombudsman Office. In this way attention could be paid to issues such as structure/organization, planning and the application of alternative operative techniques, including field research and mediation. This measure would correspond well with those proposed in points 1 and 2. 4) The Government should secure office accommodation for the Ombudsman, one that better suits the function of an agency that receives complaints and deals with the general public on a daily basis. The location should be selected considering availability of public transportation and should be completely accessible to disabled persons. The necessity of new accommodation is urgent. 3 5) The Government should re-consider the existing Law concerning the Ombudsman with the goal of providing more power to his mandate in protecting human rights. Such a revision should include purposeful consultations with groups that deal with issues of human rights and minorities, as well as with the Ombudsman. Each new regulation should be made by taking into account the Principles of National Institutions for Human Rights from Paris. Concrete amendments in the Law that should be considered include the following: change of the title into Ombudsman for Human Rights (important symbolic change); shorter mandate term, a period of 4 or 5 years along with a possibility of re-election; and a demand that necessary attention be paid to the issue of securing the representation of national minorities during the election of the Ombudsman or the deputy. 6) The proposed Ombudsman for children, as well as any other specialized Ombudsman that would be elected, should act as a part of the existing Ombudsman Office – instead of being a separate parallel organization. 7) The Ombudsman should adopt a more pro-active approach to communication. He should more frequently attend Parliament meetings, hold interviews with the media, write short reports and press releases. 8) The Ombudsman should participate to a greater extent in local and international networks of similar agencies for human rights. The Office has participated in some local meetings, yet it would have more use from an increased possibility of idea and experience exchange with nearby agencies. (It is understood that this may demand additional funds. However, if there is true interest for this activity, sources for funding can oftentimes be found). 9) The Government's Committee for Human Rights should re-examine its function that is similar to that of the Ombudsman, as a response to the complaints it receives, and consider the possibility of forwarding such complaints to the Ombudsman. The least that the two agencies should do is to exchange information in order to make sure there is no overlapping, i.e. dual responsibility. The Government's Committee should also establish a regular plan of meetings with the Ombudsman. These meetings would be valuable for the exchange of information between the two agencies with mandates for dealing with human rights. The Ombudsman could warn the Government's Office of trends or special problems that he encounters with ministries. The Government's Committee should be prepared to provide the Ombudsman with advice regarding Government's planned activities concerning human rights 4 issues and, when appropriate, to ask the Ombudsman for comments or advice. It is believed that such meetings would not compromise the independence of the Ombudsman. 10) The Government's Office for Human Rights should take the necessary steps in order to secure a wider understanding of the precise role and status of county «coordinations» that have recently been founded, from which it is expected that they submit reports concerning the protection of human rights in their region. 11) The Center for Human Rights should continue to receive support. It can play a useful role in helping to promote public understanding and acceptance of human rights principles. The Ombudsman should be invited to join the Management Board of the Center. 3. The report on the work activities of the Ombudsman for the year of 2003 has been drafted in the same way as earlier reports, so that data could be compared. However, this report includes also the report regarding the results of field visits to ten counties that the Ombudsman had visited during 2003 with his associates. The visits to counties, i.e. to particular cities and settlements in ten counties, which included discussions with local and county heads, as well as the reception of those who submitted complaints, was made possible by a generous donation of the Kingdom of Norway and the whole-hearted help of the OESS Mission to Croatia. Field work proved to be very useful –not only because it made it possible for citizens of a lower social-economic status to reach the Ombudsman more easily– but also because it made possible a direct insight into problems that citizens of particular cities and counties in the Republic of Croatia encounter, as well as a direct insight into problems of regional Government bodies and problems of local self- administration units. Unfortunately, due to the lack of space that prevents employment of new employees, last year as well no new state employee was hired. This resulted in somewhat greater arrears in work, due to a significant increase in the scope of work. For this very reason, in this introductory part the Ombudsman reinstates that it is necessary to employ
Recommended publications
  • Croatia's Constitution of 1991 with Amendments Through 2010

    Croatia's Constitution of 1991 with Amendments Through 2010

    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:24 constituteproject.org Croatia's Constitution of 1991 with Amendments through 2010 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:24 Table of contents I. Historical Foundations . 3 II. Basic Provisions . 4 III. Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms . 7 1. General Provisions . 7 2. Personal and Political Freedoms and Rights . 9 3. Economic, Social and Cultural Rights . 14 IV. Organization of Government . 18 1. The Croatian Parliament . 18 2. The President of the Republic of Croatia . 22 3. The Government of the Republic of Croatia . 26 4. Judicial Power . 28 5. The Office of the Public Prosecutions . 30 V. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia . 31 VI. Local and Regional Self-Government . 33 VII. International Relations . 35 1. International agreements . 35 2. Association and Succession . 35 VIII. European Union . 36 1. Legal Grounds for Membership and Transfer of Constitutional Powers . 36 2. Participation in European Union Institutions . 36 3. European Union Law . 37 4. Rights of European Union Citizens . 37 IX. Amending the Constitution . 37 IX. Concluding Provisions . 38 Croatia 1991 (rev. 2010) Page 2 constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:24 I. Historical Foundations • Reference to country's history The millenary identity of the Croatia nation and the continuity of its statehood,
  • Ideologija Ustaškog Pokreta I Socijalno Pitanje

    Ideologija Ustaškog Pokreta I Socijalno Pitanje

    Ideologija Ustaškog pokreta i socijalno pitanje Marić, Leo Master's thesis / Diplomski rad 2019 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: University of Zagreb, Department of Croatian Studies / Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Hrvatski studiji Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:111:109392 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-09-23 Repository / Repozitorij: Repository of University of Zagreb, Centre for Croatian Studies SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU HRVATSKI STUDIJI Leo Marić IDEOLOGIJA USTAŠKOG POKRETA I SOCIJALNO PITANJE DIPLOMSKI RAD Zagreb, 2019. SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU HRVATSKI STUDIJI ODSJEK ZA POVIJEST Leo Marić IDEOLOGIJA USTAŠKOG POKRETA I SOCIJALNO PITANJE DIPLOMSKI RAD Mentor: dr. sc. Stjepan Matković Zagreb, 2019. Sadržaj 1. Uvod....................................................................................................................................3 2. Literatura, izvori, metodologija.......................................................................................... 4 3. Ni liberalizam, ni marksizam: alternativni pogledi na socijalno pitanje u međuratnoj Europi................................................................................................................ 10 4. Oblikovanje ustaškog pogleda na socijalno pitanje (1933.–1941.).................................. 18 5. Izgradnja socijalnih ustanova u NDH 1941.–1944...........................................................24 6. “Demokratski” zaokret 1944.–1945..................................................................................30
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: ICR0000536 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (IBRD-46130 JPN-26113) ON A Public Disclosure Authorized LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$ 5 MILLION TO THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA FOR A COURT AND BANKRUPTCY ADMINISTRATION PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized June 29, 2007 Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Department Europe and Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective May 14, 2007) Currency Unit = Croatian Kuna 1.00 = US$ 0.18 US$ 1.00 = 5.41 Kuna FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CPS Country Partnership Strategy CBAP - Court and Bankruptcy Administration Project (the “Project”) EU - European Union FINA - Financial Agency (formerly “ZAP”) FMS - Financial Management Specialist IBRD - International Bank for Reconstruction and Development ICMS - Integrated Court Management System ICT - Information and Communications Technology ISR - Implementation Status Results and Reports KPI - Key Performance Indicators LIL - Learning and Innovation Loan MOF - Ministry of Finance MOJ - Ministry of Justice M&E - Monitoring and Evaluation NCSC National Center for State Courts PDO - Project Development Objective PMU - Project Management Unit SFRY - Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia TTL - Task Team Leader USAID - United States Agency for International Development Vice President: Shigeo Katsu Country Director: Anand Seth Sector Manager: Ronald Myers Project Team Leader: Irina Kichigina ICR Team Leader: Craig Neal CROATIA Court and Bankruptcy Administration Project CONTENTS Data Sheet A. Basic Information B. Key Dates C. Ratings Summary D. Sector and Theme Codes E. Bank Staff F. Results Framework Analysis G. Ratings of Project Performance in ISRs H.
  • PREPARATORY MEETING for the 12Th Meeting of the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee

    PREPARATORY MEETING for the 12Th Meeting of the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee

    Mission of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union PREPARATORY MEETING for the 12th meeting of the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee 18 November 2010 Brussels Exchange of views with Mr. Branko Baričević Ambassador of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Croatia-EU Relations........................................................................................................... 4 I.1. Progress of the Accession Negotiations ................................................................................ 4 I.2. Intensified political dialogue with the European Parliament......................................................... 5 I. 3. Intensified dialogue with the Committee of Regions................................................................. 7 I. 4. Lisbon Treaty ............................................................................................................ 7 II. Political & Administrative criteria ........................................................................................... 8 II.1. Reform of the Judiciary................................................................................................. 8 Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia ........................................................................ 8 Independence – implementation of the uniform, objective and transparent criteria for the selection of the judicial officials ........................................................................................................... 8 Professionalism
  • Peace Youth Group Danube , Vukovar

    Peace Youth Group Danube , Vukovar

    3. Struggling for the Right to a Future: Peace Youth Group Danube , Vukovar The Post-war Landscape of Vukovar In 1991, Vukovar was under siege for full three months, completely destroyed and conquered by the Yugoslav Army and the Serbian paramilitary forces on November 18, 2001, which was accompanied by a massacre of civilian population, prisoners of war and even hospital patients. More than 22 000 non-Serb inhabitants were displaced and around 8000 ended up in prisons and concentration camps throughout Serbia. The town remained under the rule of local Serb self- proclaimed authorities until the signing of the Erdut Agreement in November 1995, followed by the establishment of UN Transitional Administration in the region of Eastern Slavonia, Baranja and Western Sirmium (UNTAES) and the region’s full reintegration into the Republic of Croatia on January 15, 1998. During the two years of UNTAES, deemed one of the most successful UN missions ever of its kind, demilitarization, local elections (1997) and peaceful reintegration into the Republic of Croatia were achieved without major incidents, resulting in a considerably higher percentage of remaining Serbs, in comparison to other parts of Croatia that were reintegrated by means of military operations. At the same time, the processes of confidence building, resolution of property issues and investments into social and economic revitalization have been much slower than needed, considering the severity of devastation and trauma inflicted by the war. Despite the fact that the town of Vukovar represents the most prominent symbol of war suffering and destruction in Croatia the quality of life of its post-war inhabitants, a half of whom are returnees, has remained the worst in Croatia, with unemployment rate of 37%, incomplete reconstruction of infrastructure, only recently started investments into economic recovery, lack of social life and education opportunities and severe division along ethnic lines marking every sphere of political and daily life in Vukovar.
  • Constitutional Law on the Rights of National Minorities in the Republic of Croatia

    Constitutional Law on the Rights of National Minorities in the Republic of Croatia

    Antonija Petričušić * Constitutional Law on the Rights of National Minorities in the Republic of Croatia I. I is article explores the disposition of the new Croatian Constitutional Law on the Rights of National Minorities (hereinafter “the Constitutional Law” or “the Law”)1 adopted on December . e legislation previously governing the protection of minority rights was politically an extremely controversial and much-discussed law, and was amended and suspended quite a number of times in its existence of just over ten years. e adop- tion of the Constitutional Law was one of Croatia’s international obligations upon entry into the Council of Europe (CoE),2 as well as an imperative for implementation of the European Union Association and Stabilization Agreement.3 Even at the Law’s drafting phase, the European Commission for Democracy through Law (hereinafter “the Venice Commission”) concluded that it constituted “an important step forward in the protection of national minorities in Croatia. It provides a comprehensive and coherent framework for further legislative and regulatory action in the field of minorities’ protection”.4 e Law was drafted on the blueprint of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (FCNM), and therefore applies the most generally accepted stan- dards in minority protection. * Researcher at the European Academy of Bolzano/Bozen, Italy. e author wishes to thank her colleagues Emma Lantschner, Francesco Palermo and Jens Woelk for their useful comments to a draft of this article. 1 Constitutional Law on the Rights of National Minorities in the Republic of Croatia in Croatian language can be found in the Narodne Novine (hereinafter “Official Gazette”) 155/2002.
  • Ideologija Ustaškog Pokreta I Socijalno Pitanje

    Ideologija Ustaškog Pokreta I Socijalno Pitanje

    Ideologija Ustaškog pokreta i socijalno pitanje Marić, Leo Master's thesis / Diplomski rad 2019 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: University of Zagreb, Department of Croatian Studies / Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Hrvatski studiji Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:111:109392 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-10-02 Repository / Repozitorij: Repository of University of Zagreb, Centre for Croatian Studies SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU HRVATSKI STUDIJI Leo Marić IDEOLOGIJA USTAŠKOG POKRETA I SOCIJALNO PITANJE DIPLOMSKI RAD Zagreb, 2019. SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU HRVATSKI STUDIJI ODSJEK ZA POVIJEST Leo Marić IDEOLOGIJA USTAŠKOG POKRETA I SOCIJALNO PITANJE DIPLOMSKI RAD Mentor: dr. sc. Stjepan Matković Zagreb, 2019. Sadržaj 1. Uvod....................................................................................................................................3 2. Literatura, izvori, metodologija.......................................................................................... 4 3. Ni liberalizam, ni marksizam: alternativni pogledi na socijalno pitanje u međuratnoj Europi................................................................................................................ 10 4. Oblikovanje ustaškog pogleda na socijalno pitanje (1933.–1941.).................................. 18 5. Izgradnja socijalnih ustanova u NDH 1941.–1944...........................................................24 6. “Demokratski” zaokret 1944.–1945..................................................................................30
  • Illyrian Policy of Rome in the Late Republic and Early Principate

    Illyrian Policy of Rome in the Late Republic and Early Principate

    ILLYRIAN POLICY OF ROME IN THE LATE REPUBLIC AND EARLY PRINCIPATE Danijel Dzino Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Classics University of Adelaide August 2005 II Table of Contents TITLE PAGE I TABLE OF CONTENTS II ABSTRACT V DECLARATION VI ACKNOWLEDGMENTS VII LIST OF FIGURES VIII LIST OF PLATES AND MAPS IX 1. Introduction, approaches, review of sources and secondary literature 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Rome and Illyricum (a short story) 2 1.3 Methodology 6 1.4.1 Illyrian policy of Rome in the context of world-system analysis: Policy as an interaction between systems 9 1.4.2 The Illyrian policy of Rome in the context of world-system analysis: Working hypothesis 11 1.5 The stages in the Roman Illyrian relationship (the development of a political/constitutional framework) 16 1.6 Themes and approaches: Illyricum in Roman historiography 18 1.7.1 Literature review: primary sources 21 1.7.2 Literature review: modern works 26 2. Illyricum in Roman foreign policy: historical outline, theoretical approaches and geography 2.1 Introduction 30 2.2 Roman foreign policy: Who made it, how and why was it made, and where did it stop 30 2.3 The instruments of Roman foreign policy 36 2.4 The place of Illyricum in the Mediterranean political landscape 39 2.5 The geography and ethnography of pre-Roman Illyricum 43 III 2.5.1 The Greeks and Celts in Illyricum 44 2.5.2 The Illyrian peoples 47 3. The Illyrian policy of Rome 167 – 60 BC: Illyricum - the realm of bifocality 3.1 Introduction 55 3.2 Prelude: the making of bifocality 56 3.3 The South and Central Adriatic 60 3.4 The North Adriatic 65 3.5 Republican policy in Illyricum before Caesar: the assessment 71 4.
  • Constitution of the Republic of Croatia

    Constitution of the Republic of Croatia

    CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA I. HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS The millennial national identity of the Croatian nation and the continuity of its statehood, confirmed by the course of its entire historical experience in various political forms and by the perpetuation and development of the state-building idea grounded in the historical right of the Croatian nation to full sovereignty, has manifested itself: – in the formation of the Croatian principalities in the seventh century; – in the independent medieval state of Croatia established in the ninth century; – in the Kingdom of the Croats established in the tenth century; – in the preservation of the attributes of statehood under the Croatian-Hungarian personal union; – in the independent and sovereign decision of the Croatian Parliament in 1527 to elect a king from the Habsburg Dynasty; – in the independent and sovereign decision of the Croatian Parliament to ratify the Pragmatic Sanction in 1712; – in the conclusions of the Croatian Parliament of 1848 regarding the restoration of the integrity of the Triune Kingdom of Croatia under the authority of the ban (viceroy), rooted in the historical, national and natural right of the Croatian nation; – in the Croatian-Hungarian Compromise of 1868 regulating relations between the Kingdom of Dalmatia, Croatia and Slavonia and the Kingdom of Hungary, resting on the legal traditions of both states and the Pragmatic Sanction of 1712; – in the decision of the Croatian Parliament of 29 October 1918 to sever all constitutional ties between Croatia
  • Annual Report 2008 Annual Report 2008 HEP Group 2008 Change (2008/2007)

    Annual Report 2008 Annual Report 2008 HEP Group 2008 Change (2008/2007)

    Annual Report 2008 Annual Report 2008 HEP Group 2008 Change (2008/2007) Electricity sales 17.7 TWh 5.6 % Electricity production 14.3 TWh 3.0 % Heat sales 2.2 TWh 5.8 % Gas sales 166 mn. m3 8.5 % Operating income HRK 11,889.4 mn 9.9 % EBITDA HRK 1,922.9 mn 2.6% Group net profit HRK 31.1 mn 19.6 % Total assets HRK 32,635.4 mn 5.0 % Number of employees 14,375 0.6 % CONTENTS CHAIRMAN’S REPORT 4 PRESIDENT’S REPORT 6 COMPANY PROFILE 9 Mission and vision 11 HEP Group companies 11 Legal framework 12 Development and planned investments 13 Membership international organizations 14 Short historical overview 14 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 16 Governing bodies of HEP d.d. 18 Organizational structure of HEP d.d. 19 Members of governing bodies 20 Audit 23 Certificates 23 BUSINESS OPERATIONS IN 2008 24 Macroeconomic environment 26 Business conditions 26 Financial results achieved 27 Results by activity 29 Financial position 30 Investments 31 Credit rating 31 REPORT ON IMPACT ON HEP GROUP STAKEHOLDERS 32 Employees 34 Customers 37 Other stakeholders 39 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 40 Policy and organization of nature and environmental protection function 42 Basic indicators 42 Major achievements in 2008 45 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 48 HEP Group – Consolidated financial statements 52 Hrvatska Elektroprivreda d.d. 119 REPORTS BY HEP GROUP COMPANIES WITH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 124 HEP-Proizvodnja d.o.o. 126 HEP - Operator prijenosnog sustava d.o.o. 134 HEP - Operator distribucijskog sustava d.o.o. 142 HEP-Toplinarstvo d.o.o. 150 HEP-Plin d.o.o.
  • Financing the 2009 – 2010 Presidential Elections in Croatia: Conflicting Interpretations of Campaign Finance Laws**

    Financing the 2009 – 2010 Presidential Elections in Croatia: Conflicting Interpretations of Campaign Finance Laws**

    Zbornik PFZ, 61, (1) 41-64 (2011) 41 FinAnCing tHe 2009 – 2010 PReSidentiAL eLeCtionS in CRoAtiA: ConFLiCting inteRPRetAtionS oF CAmPAign FinAnCe LAWS** Professor Robert Podolnjak, Ph. D.* UDK: 342.849.2(497.5) 324.511(497.5) Izvorni znanstveni rad Primljeno: kolovoz 2010. The author discusses two fundamental problems relating to the funding of election campaigns in the recent presidential election in Croatia. The first pro- blem derives from the incongruence of two election campaign financing acts in Croatia – the 2004 Act on Financing the Election Campaign for the Election of the President of the Republic of Croatia and the 2007 Act on the Financing of Political Parties, Independent Lists and Candidates. The latter and the more important problem in funding the latest presidential election campaign was that the competent state bodies, authorized to implement the regulations dealing with the funding of the election campaign, were deeply divided on the question which of the two acts is relevant in regulating specific issues. The differences in the way the State Electoral Commission, the Constitutional Court, the State Audit Office and the Ministry of Administration interpreted legal regulations precluded the effective sanctioning of offences in the latest presidential election campaign in Croatia. Key words: presidential elections, Croatia, funding of the election campaign According to the final report of the OSCE mission in Croatia, the latest pre- sidential elections in Croatia (first round in December 2009 and run-off in Ja- nuary 2010), generally speaking, fulfilled the international electoral standards. However, one of the strongest reservations expressed was about the regulation of the electoral campaign financing.
  • Croatian Helsinki Committee for Human Rights

    Croatian Helsinki Committee for Human Rights

    CROATIAN HELSINKI COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Zagreb, December 15, 2003 MEDIA AND ELECTIONS 2003 ANALYSIS OF DAILY NEWSPAPERS Alija Hodžic The Media and Elections 2003 monitoring project covered the items in daily newspapers, which directly or indirectly related to the activities of the relevant actors of political life in Croatia. The method used in the research was the analysis of the content. The analysis included items, which were published in six daily newspapers (Vjesnik, Vecernji list, Jutarnji list, Slobodna Dalmacija, Novi list and Glas Slavonije) in the period since October 12until November 22, 2003. First three newspapers belong to the category of national newspapers, while other three belong to the category of regional newspapers. Two daily newspapers are majority state-owned (Vjesnik and Slobodna Dalmacija) and two are owned by domestic (mostly small) stock owners (Novi list and Glas Slavonije), while one is half-owned by domestic and foreign owners (Jutarnji list, which is the only new established daily after 1990), and one is majority- owned by foreigners. The monitored period, in spite of the fact that it represents the continuous flow, has not been analysed as a unique entity. It was divided in two separate entities: the period, which includes time of the official pre-electoral campaign (which started on November 6) and the period prior to the beginning of the official campaign (October 12 until November 5). The reasons for such division are found in the basic differences between these two periods. Specifically in the period of the official pre-electoral campaign, the election candidates were well known (political parties, coalitions, independent candidates, as well as individuals).