Deliverable 4.1 – Report on Actors Driving Forest Management In
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Deliverable 4.1 – Report on actors driving forest management in selected European countries Project Title Alternatives models and robust decision-making for future forest man- agement Project Acronym ALTERFOR Project Coordinator Ljusk Ola Eriksson, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) Scientific Coordinator Vilis Brukas, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) Project Administrator Giulia Attocchi, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) Project Duration 1 April 2016 – 30 September 2020 Project Duration in months 54 Authors, organizations (short name) Main authors: Nataly Juerges (UGOE); Max Krott (UGOE) Cases Germany: Nataly Juerges (UGOE) Case Ireland: Anders Lundholm (UCD); Edwin Corrigan (UCD) Case Italy: Mauro Masiero (UNIPD); Davide Pettenella (UNIPD) Case Lithuania: Ekaterina Makrickienė (ASU); Gintautas Mozgeris (ASU); Nerijus Pivoriūnas (SC State Forest Inventory and Management Inst.); Martas Lynikas (SC State Forest Inventory and Management Inst.); Vilis Brukas (SLU) Case The Netherlands: Bas Arts (WU); Marjanke Hoogstra-Klein (WU); Jim van Laar (WU) Case Portugal: José G. Borges (ISA); Marlene Marques (ISA); Pedro Ochôa Carvalho (ISA); Maria João Canadas (ISA); Ana Novais (ISA); Amé- rico Mendes (AFVS); Miguel Sottomayor (AFVS); Sandra Pinto (AFVS) Case Slovakia: Yvonne Brodrechtova (TUZVO); Róbert Smreček (TUZVO); Ján Bahýľ (TUZVO); Michal Bošela (TUZVO); Róbert Sedmák (TUZVO); Ján Tuček (TUZVO) Case Sweden: Isak Lodin (SLU) Case Turkey: Emin Zeki Başkent (KTU); Uzay Karahalil (KTU); Uğur Kara- koç (GDF); Burak Sarı (KTU) 1 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 676754. WP No., WPL(s) WP4, Max Krott Date of delivery by Coordinator DD Month YYYY Date of delivery according to DoA DD Month YYYY Reviewed by (see list of abbreviations used) Type of Deliverable Report X Demonstration Websites, patents, fillings, etc. Dissemination level Public Confidential, only members of the X consortium (including the Commis- sion Services) Other 2 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 676754. Contents List of Tables and Figures ................................................................................................................ 10 Abbreviations used .......................................................................................................................... 15 Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 16 Objective of the deliverable ............................................................................................................ 28 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 29 Analytical framework ...................................................................................................................... 30 Coercion .......................................................................................................................................... 30 Incentives ........................................................................................................................................ 31 Dominant information ..................................................................................................................... 31 Methods .......................................................................................................................................... 32 Actors driving forest management in the case studies ................................................................... 33 Germany- Case Study Bavaria (West Augsburg) ............................................................................. 33 1. General country information Germany ....................................................................................... 35 1.1 Current forest policy conflicts and problems ............................................................................ 35 1.2 Instruments and legal competences in German forest politics ................................................ 37 2 Actor analysis: Germany, national level ....................................................................................... 39 2.1 Interest of actors: Germany, national level ............................................................................... 39 2.2 Power of actors: Germany, national level ................................................................................. 41 2.3 Power of non-traditional forest actors to impact forest management .................................... 44 3. General case study information: Bavaria (West Augsburg) ........................................................ 45 3.1 Current forest policy conflicts and problems in Bavaria ........................................................... 46 3.2 Instruments and legal competences in Bavarian forest politics ............................................... 48 4. Actor analysis: Case study Bavaria (West Augsburg) .................................................................. 48 4.1 Interest of actors: Case study Bavaria (West Augsburg) ........................................................... 50 4.2 Power of actors: Case study Bavaria (West Augsburg) ............................................................. 51 4.3 Power of non-traditional forest actors to impact forest management .................................... 53 5. Conclusions case study Germany, Bavaria .................................................................................. 54 Germany- Case Study Brandenburg (Lieberose/Schlaubetal) ......................................................... 55 3 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 676754. 6. General case study information: Brandenburg (Lieberose/Schlaupetal) ............................... 56 6.1 Current forest policy conflicts and problems ............................................................................ 57 6.2 Instruments and legal competences in Brandenburg’s forest politics ...................................... 59 7. Actor analysis: Case study Brandenburg (Lieberose/Schlaupetal) ......................................... 60 7.1 Interests of actors: Case study Brandenburg (Lieberose/Schlaupetal) ..................................... 61 7.2 Power of actors: Case study Brandenburg (Lieberose/Schlaupetal) ......................................... 62 8. Conclusions case study Germany, Brandenburg (Lieberose/Schlaubetal) ............................. 65 Ireland – Case Study Barony of Moycullen, County Galway ........................................................... 66 9. General country information Ireland ..................................................................................... 68 9.1 Forestry conflicts in Ireland ....................................................................................................... 69 9.2 Forestry legislation and soft policy Instruments ....................................................................... 69 10. National actor analysis: Ireland .............................................................................................. 72 10.1 Interests of actors: National level ........................................................................................... 72 10.2 Power of actors: National level ............................................................................................... 73 11. Case Study Actor Analysis: Barony of Moycullen ................................................................... 76 11.1 General Case Study Information ............................................................................................. 76 11.2 Interests of actors: Case study level ........................................................................................ 77 11.3 Power of actors: Case study level............................................................................................ 78 12. Conclusions ............................................................................................................................. 80 Italy- Case Study the North East of Veneto Region ......................................................................... 81 13. General country information Italy .......................................................................................... 84 13.1 Current forest policy conflicts and problems .......................................................................... 86 13.2 Instruments and legal competences in Italian forest policies ................................................. 89 14. Actor analysis: Italy, national level ......................................................................................... 92 14.1 Interest of actors: Italy, national level .................................................................................... 92 14.2 Power of actors: Italy, national level ....................................................................................... 95 14.3 Power of forest actors to impact forest management ............................................................ 98 15. General case study information: Lowland Forest Association (Eastern Veneto) ................. 100 15.1 Current forest