DOCSLIB.ORG

Approved Conservation Advice for Endiandra Cooperana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Approved Conservation Advice for Endiandra Cooperana This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister / Delegate of the Minister on: 1/10/2008 Approved Conservation Advice (s266B of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999) Approved Conservation Advice for Endiandra cooperana This Conservation Advice has been developed based on the best available information at the time this Conservation Advice was approved; this includes existing plans, records or management prescriptions for this species. Description Endiandra cooperana, Family Lauraceae, is a tree growing to 25 m tall. Stems are usually buttressed. The leaves are 8.5–15 cm long and 3–6 cm wide. Flowers are yellow and pleasantly perfumed. Fruits are orange or yellow, globular, and 4.4–5.3 cm in diameter. Seeds are 3–4 cm in diameter (Hyland, 1990). This species is distinguished in the field by the characteristic recurved leaf tip and distinctive blaze with a blood red outer layer and yellowish subsurface layer. The outer bark is fine and thin with slight vertical fissuring. It is distinguished from other yellow fruited Endiandra species in the area by the large globular fruit (Shapcott et al., 1995). Conservation Status Endiandra cooperana is listed as endangered. This species is eligible for listing as endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act) as, prior to the commencement of the EPBC Act, it was listed as endangered under Schedule 1 of the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth). Endiandra cooperana is also listed as endangered under the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Queensland). Distribution and Habitat Endiandra cooperana is known from two multi-aged populations in well-developed lowland rainforest adjacent to Cooper Creek, north Queensland (Hyland, 1990; Shapcott et al., 1995). One population, with approximately 34 plants taller than 1 m and many seedlings, occurs within Daintree National Park. The other population is on private land with approximately 17 plants taller than 1 m and only a few smaller plants. The total estimated area of habitat is approximately 30 ha (Shapcott et al., 1995). Both populations occur in areas of remnant vegetation (Environmental Protection Agency, 2008) as defined under the Vegetation Management Act 1999 (Queensland) and are therefore currently protected from broad-scale clearing. This species occurs within the Cape York (Queensland) Natural Resource Management Region. The distribution of this species is not known to overlap with any EPBC Act-listed threatened ecological communities. Threats The main identified threats to Endiandra cooperana are clearing and development. One population centre occurs on private land and most of the creek flats in the area have been cleared in the past (Shapcott et al., 1995). Part of the population within Daintree National Park occurs along the Daintree–Cape Tribulation road. Widening of the road at this site would destroy a significant proportion of the population (Shapcott et al., 1995). Endiandra cooperana Conservation Advice - Page 1 of 2 This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister / Delegate of the Minister on: 1/10/2008 Research Priorities Research priorities that would inform future regional and local priority actions include: • Design and implement a monitoring program or, if appropriate, support and enhance existing programs. • More precisely assess population size, distribution, ecological requirements and the relative impacts of threatening processes. • Undertake survey work in suitable habitat and potential habitat to locate any additional populations/occurrences/remnants. • Undertake seed germination and/or vegetative propagation trials to determine the requirements for successful establishment. Regional and Local Priority Actions The following priority recovery and threat abatement actions can be done to support the recovery of Endiandra cooperana. Habitat Loss, Disturbance and Modification • Ensure road widening and maintenance activities (or other infrastructure or development activities) involving substrate or vegetation disturbance in areas where E. cooperana occurs do not adversely impact on known populations. • Monitor known populations to identify key threats. • Monitor the progress of recovery, including the effectiveness of management actions and the need to adapt them if necessary. • Suitably control and manage access on private land. • Minimise adverse impacts from land use at known sites. • Investigate further formal conservation arrangements, management agreements and covenants on private land, and for crown and private land investigate inclusion in reserve tenure if possible. Conservation Information • Raise awareness of E. cooperana within the local community, particularly private landholders. Enable Recovery of Additional Sites and/or Populations • Undertake appropriate seed collection and storage. • Investigate options for linking, enhancing or establishing additional populations. • Implement national translocation protocols (Vallee et al., 2004) if establishing additional populations is considered necessary and feasible. This list does not necessarily encompass all actions that may be of benefit to E. cooperana, but highlights those that are considered to be of highest priority at the time of preparing the conservation advice. Information Sources: Environmental Protection Agency 2008, Copy of the certified regional ecosystem map for the purpose of the Vegetation Management Act 1999, online RE Maps, Environmental Protection Agency, Brisbane, viewed 8 June 2008, <http://www.epa.qld.gov.au/REMAP>. Hyland, BPM 1990, ‘A revision of Lauraceae in Australia (excluding Cassytha)’, Australian Systematic Botany, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 224–225. Shapcott, A, Playford, J & Jackes, J 1995, ‘The population structure of selected rare and primitive plants from Cape Tribulation’, Botany Department, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane. Vallee, L, Hogbin, T, Monks, L, Makinson, B, Matthes, M & Rossetto, M 2004, Guidelines for the Translocation of Threatened Plants in Australia (2nd ed.), Australian Network for Plant Conservation, Canberra. Endiandra cooperana Conservation Advice - Page 2 of 2 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Checklist of Illinois Native Trees
    Technical Forestry Bulletin · NRES-102 Checklist of Illinois Native Trees Jay C. Hayek, Extension Forestry Specialist Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences Updated May 2019 This Technical Forestry Bulletin serves as a checklist of Tree species prevalence (Table 2), or commonness, and Illinois native trees, both angiosperms (hardwoods) and gym- county distribution generally follows Iverson et al. (1989) and nosperms (conifers). Nearly every species listed in the fol- Mohlenbrock (2002). Additional sources of data with respect lowing tables† attains tree-sized stature, which is generally to species prevalence and county distribution include Mohlen- defined as having a(i) single stem with a trunk diameter brock and Ladd (1978), INHS (2011), and USDA’s The Plant Da- greater than or equal to 3 inches, measured at 4.5 feet above tabase (2012). ground level, (ii) well-defined crown of foliage, and(iii) total vertical height greater than or equal to 13 feet (Little 1979). Table 2. Species prevalence (Source: Iverson et al. 1989). Based on currently accepted nomenclature and excluding most minor varieties and all nothospecies, or hybrids, there Common — widely distributed with high abundance. are approximately 184± known native trees and tree-sized Occasional — common in localized patches. shrubs found in Illinois (Table 1). Uncommon — localized distribution or sparse. Rare — rarely found and sparse. Nomenclature used throughout this bulletin follows the Integrated Taxonomic Information System —the ITIS data- Basic highlights of this tree checklist include the listing of 29 base utilizes real-time access to the most current and accept- native hawthorns (Crataegus), 21 native oaks (Quercus), 11 ed taxonomy based on scientific consensus.
    [Show full text]
  • Lauraceae – Laurel Family
    LAURACEAE – LAUREL FAMILY Plant: shrubs, trees and some vines Stem: sometimes with aromatic bark Root: Leaves: mostly evergreen, some deciduous; simple with no teeth, often elliptical and somewhat leathery; mostly alternate, less often opposite or whorled; pinnately veined with curved side veins; no stipules; sometimes glandular and aromatic Flowers: perfect but occasionally imperfect (dioecious), regular (actinomorphic); mostly in small clusters along twigs, often yellowish; tepals with 4-6 members in 2 cycles; 3-12-many, but often 9 stamens; ovary superior or inferior,1 carpel, 1 pistil Fruit: berry or drupe, single large seed Other: mostly tropical; locally, sassafras and spicebush common; Dicotyledons Group Genera: 55+ genera; locally Lindera (spice-bush), Persea, Sassafras (sassafras) WARNING – family descriptions are only a layman’s guide and should not be used as definitive LAURACEAE – LAUREL FAMILY [Northern] Spicebush; Lindera benzoin (L.) Blume Sassafras; Sassafras albidum (Nutt.) Nees [Northern] Spicebush USDA Lindera benzoin (L.) Blume Lauraceae (Laurel Family) Oak Openings Metropark, Lucas County, Ohio Notes: shrub; flowers yellow (prior to leaves), in clusters (dioecious); leaves ovate, entire, shiny green above, somewhat whitened below; bark ‘warty’ (pores); winter buds green, stalked, in alternate clusters; twigs hairy or not, often greenish; fruit a red berry or drupe; aromatic; spring [V Max Brown, 2005] Sassafras USDA Sassafras albidum (Nutt.) Nees Lauraceae (Laurel Family) Oak Openings Metropark, Lucas County, Ohio Notes: shrub or tree; flowers small and yellow; leaves alternate, lobed or not (variable), aromatic; bark deeply grooved and ridged; twigs often green (hairy or not – varieties); fruit a blue to purple drupe on red pedicel; spring [V Max Brown, 2005].
    [Show full text]
  • Take Another Look
    Take Contact Details Another SUNSHINE COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL Caloundra Customer Service Look..... 1 Omrah Avenue, Caloundra FRONT p: 07 5420 8200 e: [email protected] Maroochydore Customer Service 11-13 Ocean Street, Maroochydore p: 07 5475 8501 e: [email protected] Nambour Customer Service Cnr Currie & Bury Street, Nambour p: 07 5475 8501 e: [email protected] Tewantin Customer Service 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin p: 07 5449 5200 e: [email protected] YOUR LOCAL CONTACT Our Locals are Beauties HINTERLAND EDITION HINTERLAND EDITION 0 Local native plant guide 2 What you grow in your garden can have major impact, Introduction 3 for better or worse, on the biodiversity of the Sunshine Native plants 4 - 41 Coast. Growing a variety of native plants on your property can help to attract a wide range of beautiful Wildlife Gardening 20 - 21 native birds and animals. Native plants provide food and Introduction Conservation Partnerships 31 shelter for wildlife, help to conserve local species and Table of Contents Table Environmental weeds 42 - 73 enable birds and animals to move through the landscape. Method of removal 43 Choosing species which flower and fruit in different Succulent plants and cacti 62 seasons, produce different types of fruit and provide Water weeds 70 - 71 roost or shelter sites for birds, frogs and lizards can greatly increase your garden’s real estate value for native References and further reading 74 fauna. You and your family will benefit from the natural pest control, life and colour that these residents and PLANT TYPE ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS visitors provide – free of charge! Habitat for native frogs Tall Palm/Treefern Local native plants also improve our quality of life in Attracts native insects other ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Nature of Floral Cup in Lauraceae
    l~Yoc. Indian Acad. Sci., Vol. 88 B, Part iI, Number 4, July 1979, pp. 277-281, @ printed in India. Morphological nature of floral cup in Lauraceae S PAL School of Plant Morphology, Meerut College, Meerut 250 001 MS received 19 June 1978 Abstract. On the basis of anatomical criteria the floral cup of Lauraceae can be regarded as appendicular, as the traces entering into the floral cup are morphologi- cally compound, differentiated into tepal and stamen traces at higher levels. The ontogenetic studies also support this contention. The term Perigynous hypanthium is retained for the floral cup of Lauraceae as it is formed as a result of intercalary growth occurring underneath the region of perianth and androecium. Keywords. Lauraceae; floral cup; morphological nature; appendicular; peri- gynous hypanthium. 1. Introduction The family Lauraceae has received comparatively little attention from earlier workers because of difficulty in procuring the material. So far very little work has been done on the floral anatomy of this family (Reece 1939 ; Sastri 1952 ; Pal 1974). There has been considerable difference of opinion regarding the nature of floral cup in angiosperms. The present work was initiated to study the morphological nature of the floral cup. 2. Materials and methods The present investigation embodies the results of observations on 21 species of the Lauraceae. The material of Machilus duthiei King ex Hook.f., M. odoratissima Nees, Persea gratissima Gaertn.f., Phoebe cooperiana Kanjilal and Das, P. goal- parensis Hutch., P. hainesiana Brandis, Alseodaphne keenanii Gamble, A. owdeni Parker, Cinnamomum camphora Nees and Eberm, C. cecidodaphne Meissn., C. tamala Nees and Eberm, C.
    [Show full text]
  • IFE and Wlldll ITAT of AMERICAN SA VIRONMENT and ECOLO
    IFE AND WlLDLl ITAT OF AMERICAN SA VIRONMENT AND ECOLO By A. Binion Amerson, Jr., W. Arthur Whistler, and Terry D. Schwaner Environment Consultants, Inc., Dallas, Texas Edited by Richard C. Banks U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Washington, D.C. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF T E INTERIOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Washington, D.C. e 1982 Foreword A survey of the status of the wildlife and wildlife habitat of American Samoa. an unincorporated Territory of the United States. was recommended by administrative officials of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) in the early 1970s .Environ- ment Consultants. Inc . (ECI). based in Dallas. Texas. was selected to conduct a 2-year survey with A .Binion Amerson. Jr., as Principal Investigator . The contract was administered through the Division of Federal Aid in FWS Region I. Portland. Oregon . The primary objectives of the survey were (1) to define the major ecosystems and to inventory their physical components. vegetation. and wildlife constituents; (2) to prepare maps of these ecosystems; (3) to identify any threatened or endangered species of wildlife; and (4) to recommend wildlife management opportunities and needs . The report of the survey was to be in two parts . The first was to be a non-technical account suitable for wide general distribution; the second was to include the technical aspects of the data and data gathering. with accounts of the wildlife species . This volume represents the first part of ECI's report . The final report submitted by ECI contained more than 1. 200 pages. 200 figures. and 110 tables. many of thelatter several pages long .
    [Show full text]
  • The Laurel Or Bay Forests of the Canary Islands
    California Avocado Society 1989 Yearbook 73:145-147 The Laurel or Bay Forests of the Canary Islands C.A. Schroeder Department of Biology, University of California, Los Angeles The Canary Islands, located about 800 miles southwest of the Strait of Gibraltar, are operated under the government of Spain. There are five islands which extend from 15 °W to 18 °W longitude and between 29° and 28° North latitude. The climate is Mediterranean. The two eastern islands, Fuerteventura and Lanzarote, are affected by the Sahara Desert of the mainland; hence they are relatively barren and very arid. The northeast trade winds bring moisture from the sea to the western islands of Hierro, Gomera, La Palma, Tenerife, and Gran Canaria. The southern ends of these islands are in rain shadows, hence are dry, while the northern parts support a more luxuriant vegetation. The Canary Islands were prominent in the explorations of Christopher Columbus, who stopped at Gomera to outfit and supply his fleet prior to sailing "off the map" to the New World in 1492. Return voyages by Columbus and other early explorers were via the Canary Islands, hence many plants from the New World were first established at these points in the Old World. It is suspected that possibly some of the oldest potato germplasm still exists in these islands. Man exploited the islands by growing sugar cane, and later Mesembryanthemum crystallinum for the extraction of soda, cochineal cactus, tomatoes, potatoes, and finally bananas. The banana industry is slowly giving way to floral crops such as strelitzia, carnations, chrysanthemums, and several new exotic fruits such as avocado, mango, papaya, and carambola.
    [Show full text]
  • Endiandric Acid Derivatives and Other Constituents of Plants from the Genera Beilschmiedia and Endiandra (Lauraceae)
    Biomolecules 2015, 5, 910-942; doi:10.3390/biom5020910 OPEN ACCESS biomolecules ISSN 2218-273X www.mdpi.com/journal/biomolecules/ Review Endiandric Acid Derivatives and Other Constituents of Plants from the Genera Beilschmiedia and Endiandra (Lauraceae) Bruno Ndjakou Lenta 1,2,*, Jean Rodolphe Chouna 3, Pepin Alango Nkeng-Efouet 3 and Norbert Sewald 2 1 Department of Chemistry, Higher Teacher Training College, University of Yaoundé 1, P.O. Box 47, Yaoundé, Cameroon 2 Organic and Bioorganic Chemistry, Chemistry Department, Bielefeld University, P.O. Box 100131, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Chemistry, University of Dschang, P.O. Box 67, Dschang, Cameroon; E-Mails:[email protected] (J.R.C.); [email protected] (P.A.N.-E.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +2376-7509-7561. Academic Editor: Jürg Bähler Received: 3 March 2015 / Accepted: 6 May 2015 / Published: 14 May 2015 Abstract: Plants of the Lauraceae family are widely used in traditional medicine and are sources of various classes of secondary metabolites. Two genera of this family, Beilschmiedia and Endiandra, have been the subject of numerous investigations over the past decades because of their application in traditional medicine. They are the only source of bioactive endiandric acid derivatives. Noteworthy is that their biosynthesis contains two consecutive non-enzymatic electrocyclic reactions. Several interesting biological activities for this specific class of secondary metabolites and other constituents of the two genera have been reported, including antimicrobial, enzymes inhibitory and cytotoxic properties. This review compiles information on the structures of the compounds described between January 1960 and March 2015, their biological activities and information on endiandric acid biosynthesis, with 104 references being cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer Vision Cracks the Leaf Code
    Computer vision cracks the leaf code Peter Wilfa,1, Shengping Zhangb,c,1, Sharat Chikkerurd, Stefan A. Littlea,e, Scott L. Wingf, and Thomas Serreb,1 aDepartment of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; bDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912; cSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai 264209, Shandong, People’s Republic of China; dAzure Machine Learning, Microsoft, Cambridge, MA 02142; eLaboratoire Ecologie, Systématique et Evolution, Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France; and fDepartment of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013 Edited by Andrew H. Knoll, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and approved February 1, 2016 (received for review December 14, 2015) Understanding the extremely variable, complex shape and venation species (15–19), and there is community interest in approaching this characters of angiosperm leaves is one of the most challenging problem through crowd-sourcing of images and machine-identifi- problems in botany. Machine learning offers opportunities to analyze cation contests (see www.imageclef.org). Nevertheless, very few large numbers of specimens, to discover novel leaf features of studies have made use of leaf venation (20, 21), and none has angiosperm clades that may have phylogenetic significance, and to attempted automated learning and classification above the species use those characters to classify unknowns. Previous computer vision level that may reveal characters with evolutionary significance. approaches have primarily focused on leaf identification at the species There is a developing literature on extraction and quantitative level. It remains an open question whether learning and classification analyses of whole-leaf venation networks (22–25).
    [Show full text]
  • MPI Queensland Fruit Fly Host Material List
    Queensland fruit fly host material Please note: While the host status of some species is in dispute with some countries; for the purpose of export phytosanitary certification MPI will treat all species in this list as host material until further notice. Tissue culture and frozen commodities are not considered to be a host of Queensland fruit fly. This list may be updated. Plant name Common name Acca sellowiana (syn Feijoa sellowiana) feijoa Acmena graveolens Acmena smithii Acroychia acidula Actinidia arguta kiwiberry Actinidia chinensis green kiwifruit Actinidia deliciosa gold kiwifruit Aegle marmelos Golden apple Aglaia sapindina Alyxia ruscifolia Amorphospermum antilogum Anacardium occidentale cashew nut, cashew apple Annona cherimola cherimoya Annona glabra pond apple Annona muricata soursop Annona reticulata bullock's heart, custard apple Annona squamosa sugar apple, sweetsop Artocarpus altilis breadfruit Artocarpus heterophyllus jackfruit Averrhoa bilimbi blimbe Averrhoa carambola carambola, star fruit Beilschmiedia obtusifolia Beilschmiedia taraire Taraire Beilschmiedia tawa Tawa Blighia sapida Akee apple Calophyllum inophyllum Alexandrian laurel Cananga odorata perfume tree Canarium vulgare Java almond Capparis lucida Capparis mitchellii Capparis nobilis Capsicum annuum bell pepper Capsicum annuum var acuminatum chilli Capsicum annuum var cerasiforme cherry pepper Capsicum annuum var conoides tabasco Capsicum frutescens Carica papaya papaw, papaya Carica pentagona babaco Carissa ovata Casimiroa edulis white sapote Cassine australia Castanospora alphandii Chrysophyllum cainito caimito, star apple Cissus sp Citrullus lanatus Watermelon Citrus spp. Citrus aurantiifolia West indian lime Citrus aurantium Seville orange Citrus grandis (syn maxima) pummelo Citrus hystrix kaffir lime Citrus jambhiri rough lemon Citrus latifolia Tahatian lime Citrus limetta sweet lemon tree Citrus limon lemon Citrus maxima (syn grandis) pomelo, shaddock Citrus medica citron Citrus meyeri Meyer lemon Citrus reticulata mandarin Citrus reticulata var.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Historical Biogeography of Lauraceae
    PHYLOGENY Andre'S. Chanderbali,2'3Henk van der AND HISTORICAL Werff,3 and Susanne S. Renner3 BIOGEOGRAPHY OF LAURACEAE: EVIDENCE FROM THE CHLOROPLAST AND NUCLEAR GENOMES1 ABSTRACT Phylogenetic relationships among 122 species of Lauraceae representing 44 of the 55 currentlyrecognized genera are inferredfrom sequence variation in the chloroplast and nuclear genomes. The trnL-trnF,trnT-trnL, psbA-trnH, and rpll6 regions of cpDNA, and the 5' end of 26S rDNA resolved major lineages, while the ITS/5.8S region of rDNA resolved a large terminal lade. The phylogenetic estimate is used to assess morphology-based views of relationships and, with a temporal dimension added, to reconstructthe biogeographic historyof the family.Results suggest Lauraceae radiated when trans-Tethyeanmigration was relatively easy, and basal lineages are established on either Gondwanan or Laurasian terrains by the Late Cretaceous. Most genera with Gondwanan histories place in Cryptocaryeae, but a small group of South American genera, the Chlorocardium-Mezilauruls lade, represent a separate Gondwanan lineage. Caryodaphnopsis and Neocinnamomum may be the only extant representatives of the ancient Lauraceae flora docu- mented in Mid- to Late Cretaceous Laurasian strata. Remaining genera place in a terminal Perseeae-Laureae lade that radiated in Early Eocene Laurasia. Therein, non-cupulate genera associate as the Persea group, and cupuliferous genera sort to Laureae of most classifications or Cinnamomeae sensu Kostermans. Laureae are Laurasian relicts in Asia. The Persea group
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Canary Islands and the Laurel Forest 13
    The Laurel Forest An Example for Biodiversity Hotspots threatened by Human Impact and Global Change Dissertation 2014 Dissertation submitted to the Combined Faculties for the Natural Sciences and for Mathematics of the Ruperto–Carola–University of Heidelberg, Germany for the degree of Doctor of Natural Sciences presented by Dipl. biol. Anja Betzin born in Kassel, Hessen, Germany Oral examination date: 2 The Laurel Forest An Example for Biodiversity Hotspots threatened by Human Impact and Global Change Referees: Prof. Dr. Marcus A. Koch Prof. Dr. Claudia Erbar 3 Eidesstattliche Erklärung Hiermit erkläre ich, dass ich die vorgelegte Dissertation selbst verfasst und mich dabei keiner anderen als der von mir ausdrücklich bezeichneten Quellen und Hilfen bedient habe. Außerdem erkläre ich hiermit, dass ich an keiner anderen Stelle ein Prüfungsverfahren beantragt bzw. die Dissertation in dieser oder anderer Form bereits anderweitig als Prü- fungsarbeit verwendet oder einer anderen Fakultät als Dissertation vorgelegt habe. Heidelberg, den 23.01.2014 .............................................. Anja Betzin 4 Contents I. Summary 9 1. Abstract 10 2. Zusammenfassung 11 II. Introduction 12 3. Canary Islands and the Laurel Forest 13 4. Aims of this Study 20 5. Model Species: Laurus novocanariensis and Ixanthus viscosus 21 5.1. Laurus ...................................... 21 5.2. Ixanthus ..................................... 23 III. Material and Methods 24 6. Sampling 25 7. Laboratory Procedure 27 7.1. DNA Extraction . 27 7.2. AFLP Procedure . 27 7.3. Scoring . 29 7.4. High Resolution Melting . 30 8. Data Analysis 32 8.1. AFLP and HRM Data Analysis . 32 8.2. Hotspots — Diversity in Geographic Space . 34 8.3. Ecology — Ecological and Bioclimatic Analysis .
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Families of the United States Grouped by Diagnostic Features
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 12-6-2019 Vascular Plant Families of the United States Grouped by Diagnostic Features James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Vascular Plant Families of the United States Grouped by Diagnostic Features" (2019). Botanical Studies. 96. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/96 This Flora of the United States and North America is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLOWERING PLANT FAMILIES OF THE UNITED STATES GROUPED BY DIAGNOSTIC FEATURES James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Second edition — 6 December 2019 The focus is on families of plants found in the conterminous United States, including ornamentals. The listing of a family is not meant to imply that every species has that feature. I am using a fewfamily names, such as Liliaceae, Plantaginaceae, and Scrophulariaceae, in the traditional sense, because their limits remain unsettled. Parasitic on branches Dioscoreaceae
    [Show full text]